Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Willamette River, Oregon City, OR, 60220-60222 [2013-23860]
Download as PDF
60220
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
protection of the sediment cap and
ongoing efforts by the EPA to reduce
human health risks. This rule is
categorically excluded under section
2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Sep 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0623]
Navigation (water) and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display,
Willamette River, Oregon City, OR
ACTION:
PART 165—SAFETY ZONES
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone in Oregon
City, OR. This safety zone is necessary
to help ensure the safety of the maritime
public during a fireworks display and
will do so by prohibiting unauthorized
persons and vessels from entering the
safety zones unless authorized by the
Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port or his designated representatives.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
5, 2013 from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2013–0623]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LTJG Ian McPhillips, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety
Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone
503–240–9319, email msupdxwwm@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
(202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1201 to read as follows:
§ 165.1201 Safety Zone; Old Mormon
Slough, Stockton California.
(a) General. This safety zone is
established to protect environmental
rehabilitation efforts and prevent vessels
from disturbing the sediment cap at Old
Mormon Slough.
(b) Regulation. All vessels and
personnel not associated with the EPA
are prohibited from entering into and
transiting Old Mormon Slough. Old
Mormon Slough is defined as all waters
Eastward from the connection of
coordinates 37°57′02.13″ North,
121°18′49.55″ West and 37°57′01.11″
North, 121°18′46.75″ West (NAD 83).
(c) Each person in a safety zone who
has notice of a lawful order or direction
shall obey the order or direction of the
Captain of the Port (COTP) or District
Commander issued to carry out the
purposes of this subpart.
(d) The Coast Guard may be assisted
in enforcing this rule by other Federal,
state, or local agencies.
Dated: September 10, 2013.
K.L. Schultz,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–23859 Filed 9–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553, the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule. Waiting for a 30 day
notice period to run would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The Coast Guard did not
receive the necessary information in
time for this regulation to undertake
both an NPRM and a 30 day delayed
effective date. Additionally, waiting for
a 30 day notice period to run would be
impracticable as delayed promulgation
may result in injury or damage to
persons and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register due to the late notification of
this event and that the event will have
occurred before comments could have
been taken.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Basis and Purpose
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are
granted authority to establish safety and
security zones in 33 CFR 1.05–1(f) for
safety and environmental purposes as
described in 33 CFR part 165.
Fireworks displays create hazardous
conditions for the maritime public
because of the large number of vessels
that congregate near the displays, as
well as the noise, falling debris, and
explosions that occur during the event.
This safety zone is necessary in order to
reduce vessel traffic congestion in the
proximity of fireworks discharge sites to
prevent vessel traffic within the fallout
zone of the fireworks.
C. Discussion of the Temporary Final
Rule
This rule establishes one safety zone
in the Sector Columbia River Captain of
the Port Zone.
The safety zone would be established
to encompass all waters of the
Willamette River south of the I–205
Bridge and north of the Oregon City
Bridge, Oregon City, OR. The safety
zone will encompass approximately
1,000 feet of river length. This event
will be held on Saturday, October 5,
2013 from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Sep 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The Coast Guard has made this
determination based on the fact that the
safety zone created by this rule will not
significantly affect the maritime public
because vessels may still coordinate
their transit with the Coast Guard in the
vicinity of the safety zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
(1) This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate in the area
covered by the safety zone. This safety
zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
area can still be used to transit with
permission of the Captain of the Port.
The rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
safety zone will only be in effect late in
the evening when vessel traffic is low.
Before the effective period, we will
publish advisories in the Local Notice to
Mariners available to users of the river.
Maritime traffic will be able to schedule
their transits around the safety zone.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60221
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
60222
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do not discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Sep 30, 2013
Jkt 232001
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
creation of one safety zone during
fireworks displays to protect maritime
public. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
Dated: September 10, 2013.
S.C. MacKenzie,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
ACTION:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–259 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–259 Safety Zone; Clackamas
County Tourism Fireworks Display, Oregon
City, OR.
(a) Safety zones. The following area is
a designated safety zone:
(1) Location. All waters of the
Willamette River, Oregon City, OR,
between the I–205 Bridge and the
Oregon City Bridge.
(2) Enforcement period. This event
will be held on October 5, 2013 from
8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in this
section or bring, cause to be brought, or
allow to remain in the safety zone
created in this section any vehicle,
vessel, or object unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative. The Captain of the Port
may be assisted by other Federal, State,
or local agencies with the enforcement
of the safety zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2013–23860 Filed 9–30–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0868]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Motion Picture Stunt
Work and Filming; Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing five temporary safety zones
on waterways near Chicago, IL. These
safety zones are intended to restrict
vessels from portions of Chicago
waterways due to the filming of a
motion picture. These temporary safety
zones are necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the stunt work,
pyrotechnics, low-flying helicopter, and
other hazards involved in the filming of
a motion picture.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
on October 1 through 12 a.m. on
October 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0868. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph
McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at 414–747–7148 or
Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60220-60222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23860]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2013-0623]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Willamette River, Oregon City, OR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Oregon City,
OR. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the
maritime public during a fireworks display and will do so by
prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the safety
zones unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port or his designated representatives.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 5, 2013 from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30
p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2013-0623]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LTJG Ian McPhillips, Waterways Management Division,
Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email
msupdxwwm@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act
[[Page 60221]]
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a
rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency
for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553,
the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule. Waiting
for a 30 day notice period to run would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The Coast Guard did not receive the necessary
information in time for this regulation to undertake both an NPRM and a
30 day delayed effective date. Additionally, waiting for a 30 day
notice period to run would be impracticable as delayed promulgation may
result in injury or damage to persons and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register due to the late notification of
this event and that the event will have occurred before comments could
have been taken.
B. Basis and Purpose
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are granted authority to establish
safety and security zones in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and
environmental purposes as described in 33 CFR part 165.
Fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the maritime
public because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the
displays, as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that
occur during the event. This safety zone is necessary in order to
reduce vessel traffic congestion in the proximity of fireworks
discharge sites to prevent vessel traffic within the fallout zone of
the fireworks.
C. Discussion of the Temporary Final Rule
This rule establishes one safety zone in the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port Zone.
The safety zone would be established to encompass all waters of the
Willamette River south of the I-205 Bridge and north of the Oregon City
Bridge, Oregon City, OR. The safety zone will encompass approximately
1,000 feet of river length. This event will be held on Saturday,
October 5, 2013 from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made
this determination based on the fact that the safety zone created by
this rule will not significantly affect the maritime public because
vessels may still coordinate their transit with the Coast Guard in the
vicinity of the safety zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
(1) This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate in the area covered by the safety zone. This safety zone will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the area can still be used to transit with permission
of the Captain of the Port. The rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the
safety zone will only be in effect late in the evening when vessel
traffic is low. Before the effective period, we will publish advisories
in the Local Notice to Mariners available to users of the river.
Maritime traffic will be able to schedule their transits around the
safety zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of
[[Page 60222]]
their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act
addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local,
or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though
this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do not discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the creation of one safety zone during
fireworks displays to protect maritime public. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-259 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-259 Safety Zone; Clackamas County Tourism Fireworks
Display, Oregon City, OR.
(a) Safety zones. The following area is a designated safety zone:
(1) Location. All waters of the Willamette River, Oregon City, OR,
between the I-205 Bridge and the Oregon City Bridge.
(2) Enforcement period. This event will be held on October 5, 2013
from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to
remain in the safety zone created in this section any vehicle, vessel,
or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local agencies with the enforcement of the
safety zone.
Dated: September 10, 2013.
S.C. MacKenzie,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia
River.
[FR Doc. 2013-23860 Filed 9-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P