Medicare Program; Approval of Accrediting Organization for Suppliers of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Supplier Accreditation Program, 59701-59702 [2013-23664]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
Kimberly S. Lane,
Deputy Director, Office of Scientific Integrity,
Office of the Associate Director for Science,
Office of the Director, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–23534 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–6023–N3]
Medicare Program; Approval of
Accrediting Organization for Suppliers
of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging
Supplier Accreditation Program
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces our
approval of RadSiteTM, a national
accreditation organization to accredit
suppliers seeking to furnish the
technical component (TC) of advanced
diagnostic imaging services under the
Medicare program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Bastinelli (410) 786–3630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 135(a) of the Medicare
Improvements for Patients and
Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) added
section 1834(e) to the Social Security
Act (the Act) requiring the Secretary to
designate organizations that accredit
suppliers furnishing the technical
component (TC) of advanced diagnostic
imaging (ADI) service and establish
procedures to ensure that the criteria
used by an accreditation organization
are specific to each imaging modality.
Section 1834(e)(1)(B) of the Act defines
advanced diagnostic imaging services
as—
(i) [D]iagnostic magnetic resonance
imaging, computed tomography, and nuclear
medicine (including positron emission
tomography); and
(ii) [S]uch other diagnostic imaging
services, including services described in
section 1848(b)(4)(B) (excluding X-ray,
ultrasound, and fluoroscopy), as specified by
the Secretary in consultation with physician
specialty organizations and other
stakeholders.
Section 1848(b)(4)(B) of the Act
defines imaging services as ‘‘imaging
and computer-assisted imaging
services,’’ including x-ray, ultrasound
(including echocardiography), nuclear
medicine (including positron emission
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
tomography), magnetic resonance
imaging, computed tomography, and
fluoroscopy, but excluding diagnostic
and screening mammography.
Suppliers, which include physicians,
non-physician practitioners and
physician and non-physician
organizations, of the TC of advanced
diagnostic imaging services for which
payment is made under the fee schedule
established under section 1848(b) of the
Act, were required to be accredited by
an accreditation organization designated
by the Secretary beginning January 1,
2012.
The application requirements for
accrediting organizations were finalized
in the Calendar Year 2010 Physician Fee
Schedule final rule published on
November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61738), as
corrected in the November 30, 2009
correcting document (74 FR 62579) and
set forth as application criteria in a
November 25, 2009 Federal Register
notice (74 FR 62189), as corrected in the
November 30, 2009 correction notice (74
FR 62579).
In the January 26, 2010, Federal
Register (75 FR 4088), we announced
the approval of the American College of
Radiology (ACR), the Intersocietal
Accreditation Commission (IAC), and
The Joint Commission (TJC) as
designated accreditation organizations
to accredit suppliers furnishing the
technical component of the following
advanced diagnostic imaging
modalities: Computerized tomography,
nuclear medicine, positron emission
tomography, and magnetic resonance
imaging.
II. Application Requirements, Review,
and Approval
We received the completed
application from RadSiteTM to be
considered as a designated accreditation
organization for advanced diagnostic
imaging services on January 18, 2011.
An internal professional panel reviewed
and compared the standards contained
in the application with our
requirements in 42 CFR 414.68.
Accordingly, to be considered for
approval as a designated accreditation
organization, the accreditation
organization had to furnish the
following information specified in 42
CFR 414.68(c):
• A list of the categories of advanced
diagnostic imaging services for which
the organization is requesting approval.
• A description of the accrediting
organization’s duration of accreditation
(annual, biannual, and triennial), to
include a summary of activities that
occur at each cycle.
• A detailed description of how the
organization’s accreditation criteria
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59701
satisfy the statutory standards at section
1834(e)(3) of the Act, including the
following:
++ Qualifications of medical
personnel who are not physicians and
who furnish the TC of advanced
diagnostic imaging services.
++ Qualifications and responsibilities
of medical directors and supervising
physicians, such as training in advanced
diagnostic imaging services in a
residency program, expertise obtained
through experience or continuing
medical education courses.
++ Procedures to ensure the safety of
persons who furnish the TC of advanced
diagnostic imaging services and
individuals to whom such services are
furnished.
++ Procedures to ensure the
reliability, clarity, and accuracy of the
technical quality of diagnostic images
produced by the supplier.
++ Procedures to assist the
beneficiary in obtaining the
beneficiary’s imaging records on
request.
++ Procedures to notify CMS of any
changes to the modalities subsequent to
the organization’s accreditation
decision.
• An agreement to conform
accreditation requirements to any
changes in Medicare statutory
requirements authorized by 1834(e) of
the Act.
• An agreement to maintain or adopt
standards that are equal to, or more
stringent than, those of Medicare.
• Information that demonstrates the
accreditation organization’s knowledge
and experience in the advanced
diagnostic imaging arena.
• A plan for reducing the burden and
cost of accreditation to small and rural
suppliers that include—
++ The organization’s proposed fees
for accreditation for each modality in
which the organization intends to offer
accreditation; and
++ Any specific documentation
requirements and attestations requested
by CMS as a condition of designation.
• A detailed description of the
organization’s survey process, to
include the following:
++ Type and frequency of the surveys
performed.
++ The ability of the organization to
conduct timely reviews of accreditation
applications.
++ Description of the organization’s
audit procedures, including random site
visits; site audits or other strategies for
ensuring suppliers accredited by the
organization maintain compliance
throughout the period of accreditation.
++ Procedures for performing
unannounced site surveys.
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59702
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
++ Copies of the organization’s
survey forms.
++ A description of the accreditation
survey review process and the
accreditation status decision-making
process, including the process for
addressing identified deficiencies with
the accreditation requirements, and the
procedures used to monitor the
correction of deficiencies found during
an accreditation survey.
++ Procedures for coordinating
surveys with another accrediting
organization (when the organization
does not accredit all modalities)
provided by an applicant for
accreditation which the supplier
provided.
++ Comprehensive information about
the individuals who perform
evaluations for the accreditation
organization, including all of the
following information:
—Detailed information about the size
and composition of accreditation
teams for each category of advanced
medical imaging service supplier
accredited.
—The number of professional and
technical staff that are available for
survey.
—The education, current employment
and experience requirements
surveyors must meet.
—The content and length of any
orientation program.
—The frequency and types of in-service
training provided to survey personnel.
—The evaluation systems used to
monitor the performance of
individual surveyors and survey
teams.
—Policies and procedures regarding an
individual’s participation in the
survey or accreditation decision
process of any organization with
which the individual is professionally
or financially affiliated.
++ Policies and procedures used
when an organization has a dispute
regarding survey findings or an adverse
decision.
• A description of the organization’s
data management and analysis
capabilities in support of its surveys and
accreditation decisions, including the
kinds of reports, tables, and other
displays generated by that system.
• The organization’s procedures for
investigating and responding to
complaints against accredited facilities,
including policies and procedures
regarding coordination of these
activities with relevant licensing bodies
and CMS.
• A description of the organization’s
policies and procedures for withholding
or removal of accreditation status for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
facilities that fail to meet the
organization’s accreditation standards
and other actions taken by the
organization in response to
noncompliance with its accreditation
criteria. These policies and procedures
must include notifying CMS of facilities
that fail to meet the requirements of the
accrediting organization as required by
CMS.
• The information submitted for
notification of these organizations
include—
++ A list of all accredited suppliers
that the accrediting organization has
accredited to include the type and
category of accreditation currently held
by each supplier, and the expiration
date of each supplier’s current
accreditation; and
++ A list of all accreditation surveys
scheduled to be performed by the
organization;
• The accreditation organization must
also submit the following supporting
documentation:
++ A written presentation that
demonstrates the organization’s ability
to furnish us with electronic data in
ASCII comparable code.
++ A resource analysis that
demonstrates that the organization’s
staffing, funding, and other resources
are adequate to perform the required
surveys and related activities.
++ A statement acknowledging that,
as a condition for approval the
organization will agree to the following:
—Provide a statement agreeing to notify
us, in writing, of any supplier that
had its accreditation revoked,
withdrawn, revised, or any other
remedial or adverse action taken
against it by the accreditation
organization within 30 calendar days
of any such action taken.
—Notify all accredited suppliers within
10 calendar days of our withdrawal of
the organization’s approval of
designation authority.
—Notify us, in writing, at least 30
calendar days in advance of the
effective date of any proposed
changes in accreditation
requirements.
—Permit its surveyors to serve as
witnesses if we take an adverse action
based on accreditation findings.
—Notify us, in writing, within 2
calendar days of a deficiency
identified in any accreditation entity
where the deficiency poses an
immediate jeopardy to the supplier’s
beneficiaries or a hazard to the
general public.
—Provide, on an annual basis, summary
data specified by us that relates to the
past years’ accreditations and trends.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—Attest that the organization will not
perform any accreditation surveys of
Medicare participating suppliers with
which it has a financial relationship
with or interest.
(For further information regarding the
application requirements see the
November 25, 2009 (74 FR 62189) and
November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62579)
notices.)
We have complete our review and
believe that RadSiteTM has provided us
with demonstrated evidence of their
qualifications and ability to accredit the
categories of advanced diagnostic
imaging services to include
computerized tomography, nuclear
medicine, positron emission
tomography, and magnetic resonance
imaging as defined in sections
1834(e)(1)(B) and 1848(b)(4)(B) of the
Act. Therefore this notice announces
our approval of RadSiteTM to accredit
suppliers furnishing the TC of all
advanced imaging modalities (that is,
computerized tomography, nuclear
medicine, positron emission
tomography, and magnetic resonance
imaging) on or after September 27, 2013.
Authority: Section 1834(e) of the Act.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, MedicareSupplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: September 19, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–23664 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–4167–N]
Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals:
Adjustment to the Amount in
Controversy Threshold Amounts for
Calendar Year 2014
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
annual adjustment in the amount in
controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
hearings and judicial review under the
Medicare appeals process. The
adjustment to the AIC threshold
amounts will be effective for requests
for ALJ hearings and judicial review
filed on or after January 1, 2014. The
calendar year 2014 AIC threshold
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59701-59702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23664]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-6023-N3]
Medicare Program; Approval of Accrediting Organization for
Suppliers of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Supplier Accreditation Program
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces our approval of RadSiteTM, a
national accreditation organization to accredit suppliers seeking to
furnish the technical component (TC) of advanced diagnostic imaging
services under the Medicare program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Bastinelli (410) 786-3630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 135(a) of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and
Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) added section 1834(e) to the Social
Security Act (the Act) requiring the Secretary to designate
organizations that accredit suppliers furnishing the technical
component (TC) of advanced diagnostic imaging (ADI) service and
establish procedures to ensure that the criteria used by an
accreditation organization are specific to each imaging modality.
Section 1834(e)(1)(B) of the Act defines advanced diagnostic imaging
services as--
(i) [D]iagnostic magnetic resonance imaging, computed
tomography, and nuclear medicine (including positron emission
tomography); and
(ii) [S]uch other diagnostic imaging services, including
services described in section 1848(b)(4)(B) (excluding X-ray,
ultrasound, and fluoroscopy), as specified by the Secretary in
consultation with physician specialty organizations and other
stakeholders.
Section 1848(b)(4)(B) of the Act defines imaging services as
``imaging and computer-assisted imaging services,'' including x-ray,
ultrasound (including echocardiography), nuclear medicine (including
positron emission tomography), magnetic resonance imaging, computed
tomography, and fluoroscopy, but excluding diagnostic and screening
mammography. Suppliers, which include physicians, non-physician
practitioners and physician and non-physician organizations, of the TC
of advanced diagnostic imaging services for which payment is made under
the fee schedule established under section 1848(b) of the Act, were
required to be accredited by an accreditation organization designated
by the Secretary beginning January 1, 2012.
The application requirements for accrediting organizations were
finalized in the Calendar Year 2010 Physician Fee Schedule final rule
published on November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61738), as corrected in the
November 30, 2009 correcting document (74 FR 62579) and set forth as
application criteria in a November 25, 2009 Federal Register notice (74
FR 62189), as corrected in the November 30, 2009 correction notice (74
FR 62579).
In the January 26, 2010, Federal Register (75 FR 4088), we
announced the approval of the American College of Radiology (ACR), the
Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC), and The Joint Commission
(TJC) as designated accreditation organizations to accredit suppliers
furnishing the technical component of the following advanced diagnostic
imaging modalities: Computerized tomography, nuclear medicine, positron
emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
II. Application Requirements, Review, and Approval
We received the completed application from RadSiteTM to
be considered as a designated accreditation organization for advanced
diagnostic imaging services on January 18, 2011. An internal
professional panel reviewed and compared the standards contained in the
application with our requirements in 42 CFR 414.68. Accordingly, to be
considered for approval as a designated accreditation organization, the
accreditation organization had to furnish the following information
specified in 42 CFR 414.68(c):
A list of the categories of advanced diagnostic imaging
services for which the organization is requesting approval.
A description of the accrediting organization's duration
of accreditation (annual, biannual, and triennial), to include a
summary of activities that occur at each cycle.
A detailed description of how the organization's
accreditation criteria satisfy the statutory standards at section
1834(e)(3) of the Act, including the following:
++ Qualifications of medical personnel who are not physicians and
who furnish the TC of advanced diagnostic imaging services.
++ Qualifications and responsibilities of medical directors and
supervising physicians, such as training in advanced diagnostic imaging
services in a residency program, expertise obtained through experience
or continuing medical education courses.
++ Procedures to ensure the safety of persons who furnish the TC of
advanced diagnostic imaging services and individuals to whom such
services are furnished.
++ Procedures to ensure the reliability, clarity, and accuracy of
the technical quality of diagnostic images produced by the supplier.
++ Procedures to assist the beneficiary in obtaining the
beneficiary's imaging records on request.
++ Procedures to notify CMS of any changes to the modalities
subsequent to the organization's accreditation decision.
An agreement to conform accreditation requirements to any
changes in Medicare statutory requirements authorized by 1834(e) of the
Act.
An agreement to maintain or adopt standards that are equal
to, or more stringent than, those of Medicare.
Information that demonstrates the accreditation
organization's knowledge and experience in the advanced diagnostic
imaging arena.
A plan for reducing the burden and cost of accreditation
to small and rural suppliers that include--
++ The organization's proposed fees for accreditation for each
modality in which the organization intends to offer accreditation; and
++ Any specific documentation requirements and attestations
requested by CMS as a condition of designation.
A detailed description of the organization's survey
process, to include the following:
++ Type and frequency of the surveys performed.
++ The ability of the organization to conduct timely reviews of
accreditation applications.
++ Description of the organization's audit procedures, including
random site visits; site audits or other strategies for ensuring
suppliers accredited by the organization maintain compliance throughout
the period of accreditation.
++ Procedures for performing unannounced site surveys.
[[Page 59702]]
++ Copies of the organization's survey forms.
++ A description of the accreditation survey review process and the
accreditation status decision-making process, including the process for
addressing identified deficiencies with the accreditation requirements,
and the procedures used to monitor the correction of deficiencies found
during an accreditation survey.
++ Procedures for coordinating surveys with another accrediting
organization (when the organization does not accredit all modalities)
provided by an applicant for accreditation which the supplier provided.
++ Comprehensive information about the individuals who perform
evaluations for the accreditation organization, including all of the
following information:
--Detailed information about the size and composition of accreditation
teams for each category of advanced medical imaging service supplier
accredited.
--The number of professional and technical staff that are available for
survey.
--The education, current employment and experience requirements
surveyors must meet.
--The content and length of any orientation program.
--The frequency and types of in-service training provided to survey
personnel.
--The evaluation systems used to monitor the performance of individual
surveyors and survey teams.
--Policies and procedures regarding an individual's participation in
the survey or accreditation decision process of any organization with
which the individual is professionally or financially affiliated.
++ Policies and procedures used when an organization has a dispute
regarding survey findings or an adverse decision.
A description of the organization's data management and
analysis capabilities in support of its surveys and accreditation
decisions, including the kinds of reports, tables, and other displays
generated by that system.
The organization's procedures for investigating and
responding to complaints against accredited facilities, including
policies and procedures regarding coordination of these activities with
relevant licensing bodies and CMS.
A description of the organization's policies and
procedures for withholding or removal of accreditation status for
facilities that fail to meet the organization's accreditation standards
and other actions taken by the organization in response to
noncompliance with its accreditation criteria. These policies and
procedures must include notifying CMS of facilities that fail to meet
the requirements of the accrediting organization as required by CMS.
The information submitted for notification of these
organizations include--
++ A list of all accredited suppliers that the accrediting
organization has accredited to include the type and category of
accreditation currently held by each supplier, and the expiration date
of each supplier's current accreditation; and
++ A list of all accreditation surveys scheduled to be performed by
the organization;
The accreditation organization must also submit the
following supporting documentation:
++ A written presentation that demonstrates the organization's
ability to furnish us with electronic data in ASCII comparable code.
++ A resource analysis that demonstrates that the organization's
staffing, funding, and other resources are adequate to perform the
required surveys and related activities.
++ A statement acknowledging that, as a condition for approval the
organization will agree to the following:
--Provide a statement agreeing to notify us, in writing, of any
supplier that had its accreditation revoked, withdrawn, revised, or any
other remedial or adverse action taken against it by the accreditation
organization within 30 calendar days of any such action taken.
--Notify all accredited suppliers within 10 calendar days of our
withdrawal of the organization's approval of designation authority.
--Notify us, in writing, at least 30 calendar days in advance of the
effective date of any proposed changes in accreditation requirements.
--Permit its surveyors to serve as witnesses if we take an adverse
action based on accreditation findings.
--Notify us, in writing, within 2 calendar days of a deficiency
identified in any accreditation entity where the deficiency poses an
immediate jeopardy to the supplier's beneficiaries or a hazard to the
general public.
--Provide, on an annual basis, summary data specified by us that
relates to the past years' accreditations and trends.
--Attest that the organization will not perform any accreditation
surveys of Medicare participating suppliers with which it has a
financial relationship with or interest.
(For further information regarding the application requirements see the
November 25, 2009 (74 FR 62189) and November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62579)
notices.)
We have complete our review and believe that RadSiteTM
has provided us with demonstrated evidence of their qualifications and
ability to accredit the categories of advanced diagnostic imaging
services to include computerized tomography, nuclear medicine, positron
emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging as defined in
sections 1834(e)(1)(B) and 1848(b)(4)(B) of the Act. Therefore this
notice announces our approval of RadSiteTM to accredit
suppliers furnishing the TC of all advanced imaging modalities (that
is, computerized tomography, nuclear medicine, positron emission
tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) on or after September 27,
2013.
Authority: Section 1834(e) of the Act.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774,
Medicare-Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: September 19, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-23664 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P