Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals: Adjustment to the Amount in Controversy Threshold Amounts for Calendar Year 2014, 59702-59704 [2013-23655]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59702
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
++ Copies of the organization’s
survey forms.
++ A description of the accreditation
survey review process and the
accreditation status decision-making
process, including the process for
addressing identified deficiencies with
the accreditation requirements, and the
procedures used to monitor the
correction of deficiencies found during
an accreditation survey.
++ Procedures for coordinating
surveys with another accrediting
organization (when the organization
does not accredit all modalities)
provided by an applicant for
accreditation which the supplier
provided.
++ Comprehensive information about
the individuals who perform
evaluations for the accreditation
organization, including all of the
following information:
—Detailed information about the size
and composition of accreditation
teams for each category of advanced
medical imaging service supplier
accredited.
—The number of professional and
technical staff that are available for
survey.
—The education, current employment
and experience requirements
surveyors must meet.
—The content and length of any
orientation program.
—The frequency and types of in-service
training provided to survey personnel.
—The evaluation systems used to
monitor the performance of
individual surveyors and survey
teams.
—Policies and procedures regarding an
individual’s participation in the
survey or accreditation decision
process of any organization with
which the individual is professionally
or financially affiliated.
++ Policies and procedures used
when an organization has a dispute
regarding survey findings or an adverse
decision.
• A description of the organization’s
data management and analysis
capabilities in support of its surveys and
accreditation decisions, including the
kinds of reports, tables, and other
displays generated by that system.
• The organization’s procedures for
investigating and responding to
complaints against accredited facilities,
including policies and procedures
regarding coordination of these
activities with relevant licensing bodies
and CMS.
• A description of the organization’s
policies and procedures for withholding
or removal of accreditation status for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
facilities that fail to meet the
organization’s accreditation standards
and other actions taken by the
organization in response to
noncompliance with its accreditation
criteria. These policies and procedures
must include notifying CMS of facilities
that fail to meet the requirements of the
accrediting organization as required by
CMS.
• The information submitted for
notification of these organizations
include—
++ A list of all accredited suppliers
that the accrediting organization has
accredited to include the type and
category of accreditation currently held
by each supplier, and the expiration
date of each supplier’s current
accreditation; and
++ A list of all accreditation surveys
scheduled to be performed by the
organization;
• The accreditation organization must
also submit the following supporting
documentation:
++ A written presentation that
demonstrates the organization’s ability
to furnish us with electronic data in
ASCII comparable code.
++ A resource analysis that
demonstrates that the organization’s
staffing, funding, and other resources
are adequate to perform the required
surveys and related activities.
++ A statement acknowledging that,
as a condition for approval the
organization will agree to the following:
—Provide a statement agreeing to notify
us, in writing, of any supplier that
had its accreditation revoked,
withdrawn, revised, or any other
remedial or adverse action taken
against it by the accreditation
organization within 30 calendar days
of any such action taken.
—Notify all accredited suppliers within
10 calendar days of our withdrawal of
the organization’s approval of
designation authority.
—Notify us, in writing, at least 30
calendar days in advance of the
effective date of any proposed
changes in accreditation
requirements.
—Permit its surveyors to serve as
witnesses if we take an adverse action
based on accreditation findings.
—Notify us, in writing, within 2
calendar days of a deficiency
identified in any accreditation entity
where the deficiency poses an
immediate jeopardy to the supplier’s
beneficiaries or a hazard to the
general public.
—Provide, on an annual basis, summary
data specified by us that relates to the
past years’ accreditations and trends.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—Attest that the organization will not
perform any accreditation surveys of
Medicare participating suppliers with
which it has a financial relationship
with or interest.
(For further information regarding the
application requirements see the
November 25, 2009 (74 FR 62189) and
November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62579)
notices.)
We have complete our review and
believe that RadSiteTM has provided us
with demonstrated evidence of their
qualifications and ability to accredit the
categories of advanced diagnostic
imaging services to include
computerized tomography, nuclear
medicine, positron emission
tomography, and magnetic resonance
imaging as defined in sections
1834(e)(1)(B) and 1848(b)(4)(B) of the
Act. Therefore this notice announces
our approval of RadSiteTM to accredit
suppliers furnishing the TC of all
advanced imaging modalities (that is,
computerized tomography, nuclear
medicine, positron emission
tomography, and magnetic resonance
imaging) on or after September 27, 2013.
Authority: Section 1834(e) of the Act.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, MedicareSupplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: September 19, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–23664 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–4167–N]
Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals:
Adjustment to the Amount in
Controversy Threshold Amounts for
Calendar Year 2014
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
annual adjustment in the amount in
controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
hearings and judicial review under the
Medicare appeals process. The
adjustment to the AIC threshold
amounts will be effective for requests
for ALJ hearings and judicial review
filed on or after January 1, 2014. The
calendar year 2014 AIC threshold
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
amounts are $140 for ALJ hearings and
$1,430 for judicial review.
DATES: This notice is effective on
January 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz
Hosna (Katherine.Hosna@cms.hhs.gov),
(410) 786–4993.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1869(b)(1)(E) of the Social
Security Act (the Act), as amended by
section 521 of the Medicare, Medicaid,
and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and
Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA),
established the amount in controversy
(AIC) threshold amounts for
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing
requests and judicial review at $100 and
$1,000, respectively, for Medicare Part
A and Part B appeals. Section 940 of the
Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA), amended section
1869(b)(1)(E) of the Act to require the
AIC threshold amounts for ALJ hearings
and judicial review to be adjusted
annually. The AIC threshold amounts
are to be adjusted, as of January 2005,
by the percentage increase in the
medical care component of the
consumer price index (CPI) for all urban
consumers (U.S. city average) for July
2003 to July of the year preceding the
year involved and rounded to the
nearest multiple of $10. Section
940(b)(2) of the MMA provided
conforming amendments to apply the
AIC adjustment requirement to
Medicare Part C/Medicare Advantage
(MA) appeals and certain health
maintenance organization and
competitive health plan appeals. Health
care prepayment plans are also subject
to MA appeals rules, including the AIC
adjustment requirement. Section 101 of
the MMA provides for the application of
the AIC adjustment requirement to
Medicare Part D appeals.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Medicare Part A and Part B Appeals
The statutory formula for the annual
adjustment to the AIC threshold
amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial
review of Medicare Part A and Part B
appeals, set forth at section
1869(b)(1)(E) of the Act, is included in
the applicable implementing
regulations, 42 CFR 405.1006(b) and (c).
The regulations require the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (the Secretary) to publish
changes to the AIC threshold amounts
in the Federal Register
(§ 405.1006(b)(2)). In order to be entitled
to a hearing before an ALJ, a party to a
proceeding must meet the AIC
requirements at § 405.1006(b). Similarly,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
a party must meet the AIC requirements
at § 405.1006(c) at the time judicial
review is requested for the court to have
jurisdiction over the appeal
(§ 405.1136(a)).
B. Medicare Part C/MA Appeals
Section 940(b)(2) of the MMA applies
the AIC adjustment requirement to
Medicare Part C appeals by amending
section 1852(g)(5) of the Act. The
implementing regulations for Medicare
Part C appeals are found at 42 CFR part
422, subpart M. Specifically, § 422.600
and § 422.612 discuss the AIC threshold
amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial
review. Section 422.600 grants any party
to the reconsideration, except the MA
organization, who is dissatisfied with
the reconsideration determination, a
right to an ALJ hearing as long as the
amount remaining in controversy after
reconsideration meets the threshold
requirement established annually by the
Secretary. Section 422.612 states, in
part, that any party, including the MA
organization, may request judicial
review if the AIC meets the threshold
requirement established annually by the
Secretary.
C. Health Maintenance Organizations,
Competitive Medical Plans, and Health
Care Prepayment Plans
Section 1876(c)(5)(B) of the Act states
that the annual adjustment to the AIC
dollar amounts set forth in section
1869(b)(1)(E) of the Act applies to
certain beneficiary appeals within the
context of health maintenance
organizations and competitive medical
plans. The applicable implementing
regulations for Medicare Part C appeals
are set forth in 42 CFR part 422, subpart
M, and as discussed previously, apply
to these appeals. The Medicare Part C
appeals rules also apply to health care
prepayment plan appeals.
D. Medicare Part D (Prescription Drug
Plan) Appeals
The annually adjusted AIC threshold
amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial
review that apply to Medicare Parts A,
B, and C appeals also apply to Medicare
Part D appeals. Section 101 of the MMA
added section 1860D–4(h)(1) of the Act
regarding Part D appeals. This statutory
provision requires a prescription drug
plan sponsor to meet the requirements
set forth in sections 1852(g)(4) and (g)(5)
of the Act, in a similar manner as MA
organizations. As noted previously, the
annually adjusted AIC threshold
requirement was added to section
1852(g)(5) of the Act by section
940(b)(2)(A) of the MMA. The
implementing regulations for Medicare
Part D appeals can be found at 42 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59703
part 423, subparts M and U. The
regulations at § 423.562(c) prescribe
that, unless the Part D appeals rules
provide otherwise, the Part C appeals
rules (including the annually adjusted
AIC threshold amount) apply to Part D
appeals to the extent they are
appropriate. More specifically,
§ 423.1970 and § 423.1976 of the Part D
appeals rules discuss the AIC threshold
amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial
review. Section 423.1970(a) grants a Part
D enrollee, who is dissatisfied with the
independent review entity (IRE)
reconsideration determination, a right to
an ALJ hearing if the amount remaining
in controversy after the IRE
reconsideration meets the threshold
amount established annually by the
Secretary. Sections 423.1976(a) and (b)
allow a Part D enrollee to request
judicial review of an ALJ or MAC
decision if, in part, the AIC meets the
threshold amount established annually
by the Secretary.
II. Annual AIC Adjustments
A. AIC Adjustment Formula and AIC
Adjustments
As previously noted, section 940 of
the MMA requires that the AIC
threshold amounts be adjusted
annually, beginning in January 2005, by
the percentage increase in the medical
care component of the CPI for all urban
consumers (U.S. city average) for July
2003 to July of the year preceding the
year involved and rounded to the
nearest multiple of $10.
B. Calendar Year 2014
The AIC threshold amount for ALJ
hearing requests will remain at $140
and the AIC threshold amount for
judicial review will rise to $1,430 for CY
2014. These amounts are based on the
42.754 percent increase in the medical
care component of the CPI, which was
at 297.600 in July 2003 and rose to
424.836 in July 2013. The AIC threshold
amount for ALJ hearing requests
changes to $142.75 based on the 42.754
percent increase over the initial
threshold amount of $100 established in
2003. In accordance with section
1869(b)(1)(E)(iii) of the Act, the adjusted
threshold amounts are rounded to the
nearest multiple of $10. Therefore, the
CY 2014 AIC threshold amount for ALJ
hearings is $140.00. The AIC threshold
amount for judicial review changes to
$1,427.54 based on the 42.754 percent
increase over the initial threshold
amount of $1,000. This amount was
rounded to the nearest multiple of $10,
resulting in the CY 2014 AIC threshold
amount of $1,430.00 for judicial review.
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
59704
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
C. Summary Table of Adjustments in
the AIC Threshold Amounts
In the following table we list the CYs
2010 through 2014 threshold amounts.
CY 2010
ALJ Hearing .........................................................................
Judicial Review ....................................................................
CY 2011
$130
1,260
$130
1,300
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
I. Background and Legislative
Authority
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
Section 353 of the Public Health
Service Act (PHSA), as amended by the
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) (Pub. L.
100–578), which was enacted on
October 31, 1988, generally provides
that no laboratory may perform tests on
human specimens for the diagnosis,
prevention or treatment of any disease
or impairment of, or assessment of the
health of, human beings unless it has a
certificate to perform that category of
tests issued by the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS). Under section 1861(s)
of the Social Security Act (the Act), the
Medicare program will only pay for
laboratory services if the laboratory has
a CLIA certificate. Section 1902(a)(9)(C)
of the Act requires that state Medicaid
plans pay only for laboratory services
furnished by CLIA-certified laboratories.
Thus, although subject to specified
exemptions and exceptions, laboratories
generally must have a current and valid
CLIA certificate to test human
specimens for medical purposes noted
above to be eligible for payment for
those tests from the Medicare or
Medicaid programs. Regulations
implementing section 353 of the PHSA
are contained in 42 CFR part 493.
Section 353(p) of the PHSA provides
for the exemption of laboratories from
CLIA requirements in states that enact
legal requirements that are equal to or
more stringent than CLIA’s statutory
and regulatory requirements. Section
353(p) of the PHSA is implemented in
subpart E of our regulations at 42 CFR
part 493. Sections 493.551 and 493.553
provide that we may exempt from CLIA
requirements, for a period not to exceed
6 years, all state-licensed or -approved
laboratories in a state if the state
licensure program meets the specified
conditions. Section 493.559 provides
that we will publish a notice in the
Federal Register when we grant
exemption to an approved state
licensure program. It also provides that
the notice will include the following:
• The basis for granting the
exemption.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773 Medicare—Hospital
Insurance Program; and No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: September 23, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–23655 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–3111–N]
Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA
Programs; Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments of 1988
Exemption of Laboratories Licensed
by the State of Washington
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
laboratories located in and licensed by
the State of Washington that possess a
valid license under the Medical Test
Site law, Chapter 70.42 of the Revised
Code of Washington, are exempt from
the requirements of the Clinical
Laboratory Improvement Amendments
of 1988 (CLIA) for a period of 6 years.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective from September 27,
2013 to September 27, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Farragut, (410) 786–3531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CY 2012
$130
1,350
CY 2013
$140
1,400
CY 2014
$140
1,430
• A description of how the laboratory
requirements are equal to or more
stringent than those of CLIA.
• The term of approval, not to exceed
6 years.
State of Washington’s Application for
CLIA Exemption of Its Laboratories
The State of Washington has applied
for exemption of its laboratories from
CLIA program requirements. The State
of Washington submitted all of the
applicable information and attestations
required by § 493.551, § 493.553, and
§ 493.557 for state licensure programs
seeking exemption of their licensed
laboratories from CLIA program
requirements.
Examples of documents and
information submitted include: a
comparison of its laboratory licensure
requirements with comparable CLIA
condition-level requirements (that is, a
crosswalk); and a description of the
following: Its inspection process; its
proficiency testing monitoring process;
its data management and analysis
system; its investigative and response
procedures for complaints received
against laboratories; and its policy
regarding announced and unannounced
inspections.
CMS Analysis of Washington’s
Application and Supporting
Documentation
To determine whether we should
grant a CLIA exemption to laboratories
licensed by a state, we review the
application and additional
documentation that the state submits to
us and conducts a detailed and in-depth
comparison of the state licensure
program and CLIA’s statutory and
regulatory requirements to determine
whether the state program meets the
requirements at subpart E of part 493.
In summary, the state generally must
demonstrate that:
• It has state laws in effect that
provide for a state licensure program
that has requirements that are equal to
or more stringent than CLIA conditionlevel requirements for laboratories.
• It has implemented a state licensure
program with requirements that are
equal to or more stringent than the CLIA
condition-level requirements such that a
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59702-59704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23655]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-4167-N]
Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals: Adjustment to the Amount in
Controversy Threshold Amounts for Calendar Year 2014
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the annual adjustment in the amount in
controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
hearings and judicial review under the Medicare appeals process. The
adjustment to the AIC threshold amounts will be effective for requests
for ALJ hearings and judicial review filed on or after January 1, 2014.
The calendar year 2014 AIC threshold
[[Page 59703]]
amounts are $140 for ALJ hearings and $1,430 for judicial review.
DATES: This notice is effective on January 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz Hosna
(Katherine.Hosna@cms.hhs.gov), (410) 786-4993.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1869(b)(1)(E) of the Social Security Act (the Act), as
amended by section 521 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits
Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA), established the amount
in controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ) hearing requests and judicial review at $100 and $1,000,
respectively, for Medicare Part A and Part B appeals. Section 940 of
the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA), amended section 1869(b)(1)(E) of the Act to require the AIC
threshold amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial review to be adjusted
annually. The AIC threshold amounts are to be adjusted, as of January
2005, by the percentage increase in the medical care component of the
consumer price index (CPI) for all urban consumers (U.S. city average)
for July 2003 to July of the year preceding the year involved and
rounded to the nearest multiple of $10. Section 940(b)(2) of the MMA
provided conforming amendments to apply the AIC adjustment requirement
to Medicare Part C/Medicare Advantage (MA) appeals and certain health
maintenance organization and competitive health plan appeals. Health
care prepayment plans are also subject to MA appeals rules, including
the AIC adjustment requirement. Section 101 of the MMA provides for the
application of the AIC adjustment requirement to Medicare Part D
appeals.
A. Medicare Part A and Part B Appeals
The statutory formula for the annual adjustment to the AIC
threshold amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial review of Medicare Part
A and Part B appeals, set forth at section 1869(b)(1)(E) of the Act, is
included in the applicable implementing regulations, 42 CFR 405.1006(b)
and (c). The regulations require the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to publish changes to the AIC
threshold amounts in the Federal Register (Sec. 405.1006(b)(2)). In
order to be entitled to a hearing before an ALJ, a party to a
proceeding must meet the AIC requirements at Sec. 405.1006(b).
Similarly, a party must meet the AIC requirements at Sec. 405.1006(c)
at the time judicial review is requested for the court to have
jurisdiction over the appeal (Sec. 405.1136(a)).
B. Medicare Part C/MA Appeals
Section 940(b)(2) of the MMA applies the AIC adjustment requirement
to Medicare Part C appeals by amending section 1852(g)(5) of the Act.
The implementing regulations for Medicare Part C appeals are found at
42 CFR part 422, subpart M. Specifically, Sec. 422.600 and Sec.
422.612 discuss the AIC threshold amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial
review. Section 422.600 grants any party to the reconsideration, except
the MA organization, who is dissatisfied with the reconsideration
determination, a right to an ALJ hearing as long as the amount
remaining in controversy after reconsideration meets the threshold
requirement established annually by the Secretary. Section 422.612
states, in part, that any party, including the MA organization, may
request judicial review if the AIC meets the threshold requirement
established annually by the Secretary.
C. Health Maintenance Organizations, Competitive Medical Plans, and
Health Care Prepayment Plans
Section 1876(c)(5)(B) of the Act states that the annual adjustment
to the AIC dollar amounts set forth in section 1869(b)(1)(E) of the Act
applies to certain beneficiary appeals within the context of health
maintenance organizations and competitive medical plans. The applicable
implementing regulations for Medicare Part C appeals are set forth in
42 CFR part 422, subpart M, and as discussed previously, apply to these
appeals. The Medicare Part C appeals rules also apply to health care
prepayment plan appeals.
D. Medicare Part D (Prescription Drug Plan) Appeals
The annually adjusted AIC threshold amounts for ALJ hearings and
judicial review that apply to Medicare Parts A, B, and C appeals also
apply to Medicare Part D appeals. Section 101 of the MMA added section
1860D-4(h)(1) of the Act regarding Part D appeals. This statutory
provision requires a prescription drug plan sponsor to meet the
requirements set forth in sections 1852(g)(4) and (g)(5) of the Act, in
a similar manner as MA organizations. As noted previously, the annually
adjusted AIC threshold requirement was added to section 1852(g)(5) of
the Act by section 940(b)(2)(A) of the MMA. The implementing
regulations for Medicare Part D appeals can be found at 42 CFR part
423, subparts M and U. The regulations at Sec. 423.562(c) prescribe
that, unless the Part D appeals rules provide otherwise, the Part C
appeals rules (including the annually adjusted AIC threshold amount)
apply to Part D appeals to the extent they are appropriate. More
specifically, Sec. 423.1970 and Sec. 423.1976 of the Part D appeals
rules discuss the AIC threshold amounts for ALJ hearings and judicial
review. Section 423.1970(a) grants a Part D enrollee, who is
dissatisfied with the independent review entity (IRE) reconsideration
determination, a right to an ALJ hearing if the amount remaining in
controversy after the IRE reconsideration meets the threshold amount
established annually by the Secretary. Sections 423.1976(a) and (b)
allow a Part D enrollee to request judicial review of an ALJ or MAC
decision if, in part, the AIC meets the threshold amount established
annually by the Secretary.
II. Annual AIC Adjustments
A. AIC Adjustment Formula and AIC Adjustments
As previously noted, section 940 of the MMA requires that the AIC
threshold amounts be adjusted annually, beginning in January 2005, by
the percentage increase in the medical care component of the CPI for
all urban consumers (U.S. city average) for July 2003 to July of the
year preceding the year involved and rounded to the nearest multiple of
$10.
B. Calendar Year 2014
The AIC threshold amount for ALJ hearing requests will remain at
$140 and the AIC threshold amount for judicial review will rise to
$1,430 for CY 2014. These amounts are based on the 42.754 percent
increase in the medical care component of the CPI, which was at 297.600
in July 2003 and rose to 424.836 in July 2013. The AIC threshold amount
for ALJ hearing requests changes to $142.75 based on the 42.754 percent
increase over the initial threshold amount of $100 established in 2003.
In accordance with section 1869(b)(1)(E)(iii) of the Act, the adjusted
threshold amounts are rounded to the nearest multiple of $10.
Therefore, the CY 2014 AIC threshold amount for ALJ hearings is
$140.00. The AIC threshold amount for judicial review changes to
$1,427.54 based on the 42.754 percent increase over the initial
threshold amount of $1,000. This amount was rounded to the nearest
multiple of $10, resulting in the CY 2014 AIC threshold amount of
$1,430.00 for judicial review.
[[Page 59704]]
C. Summary Table of Adjustments in the AIC Threshold Amounts
In the following table we list the CYs 2010 through 2014 threshold
amounts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 CY 2014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALJ Hearing..................... $130 $130 $130 $140 $140
Judicial Review................. 1,260 1,300 1,350 1,400 1,430
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773
Medicare--Hospital Insurance Program; and No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: September 23, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-23655 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P