Transmission Infrastructure Program; Proposed Transmission Infrastructure Program Updates and Request for Comments, 59666-59670 [2013-23604]
Download as PDF
59666
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/11/13.
Docket Numbers: ER13–2408–000.
Applicants: ISO New England Inc.,
Bangor Hydro Electric Company.
Description: BHE and ISO–NE Filing
of New LSAs to be effective 9/19/2013.
Filed Date: 9/20/13.
Accession Number: 20130920–5063.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/11/13.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric securities
filings:
Docket Numbers: ES13–56–000.
Applicants: Transource Missouri,
LLC.
Description: Application of
Transource Missouri, LLC for
Authorization Under Section 204(A) of
the Federal Power Act to Borrow Up to
$350 Million.
Filed Date: 9/20/13.
Accession Number: 20130920–5059.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/11/13.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: September 20, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–23572 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Western Area Power Administration
Transmission Infrastructure Program;
Proposed Transmission Infrastructure
Program Updates and Request for
Comments
Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Western Area Power
Administration (‘‘Western’’) hereby
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
announces updates to its Transmission
Infrastructure Program (‘‘the Program’’
or TIP). The Program implements
Section 402 of the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(‘‘Recovery Act’’) regarding loans for the
purpose of: (1) Constructing, financing,
facilitating, planning, operating,
maintaining, or studying construction of
new or upgraded electric power
transmission lines and related facilities
with at least one terminus within
Western’s service territory, and (2)
delivering or facilitating the delivery of
power generated by renewable energy
resources constructed, or reasonably
expected to be constructed, after the
date that the Recovery Act was enacted.
Through this Federal Register notice
(FRN), Western seeks public comment
on proposed updates to the Program.
The proposed updates will create a
more efficient and transparent process
to screen and evaluate potential
projects, improve communications with
project applicants, promote additional
interest from potential applicants that
seek Western’s assistance to develop a
project and use Western’s Recovery Act
borrowing authority, and integrate the
DOE Loan Programs Office into the
process. The FRN also identifies the
principles Western will continue using
to ensure (1) that the Program is
separate and distinct from Western’s
power marketing functions, and (2) that
each eligible TIP project stands on its
own for repayment purposes.
DATES: The comment period begins
September 27, 2013 and ends October
28, 2013. Western will accept written
comments at any time during the
consultation and comment period but
no later than October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
Transmission Infrastructure Program,
Western Area Power Administration,
P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood, CO 80228–
8213, email TXRFI@wapa.gov. Western
will post information about Program
developments on its Web site at
https://ww2.wapa.gov/sites/western/
recovery/Pages/default.aspx, including
written comments received in response
to this FRN after the close of the
comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Mr. John Kral,
Transmission Infrastructure Program,
Western Area Power Administration,
P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood, CO 80228,
telephone (720) 962–7710, email
TXRFI@wapa.gov. This FRN is also
available on Western’s Web site at
https://ww2.wapa.gov/sites/western/
recovery/Pages/default.aspx.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
Western markets and transmits
wholesale hydroelectric power
generated at Federal dams across the
western United States. Western’s
transmission system was developed to
deliver Federal hydroelectric power to
preference customers. Western owns
and operates a transmission system with
more than 17,000 circuit-mile, highvoltage lines and also markets power
across 15 western states and a 1.3
million square-mile service area.
Western’s service area encompasses all
of the following states: Arizona,
California, Colorado, Nebraska, Nevada,
New Mexico, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah and Wyoming; and parts of
Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Minnesota, and
Texas.
Western markets excess capacity on
its transmission system consistent with
the policies and procedures outlined in
its Open Access Transmission Tariff
(OATT) on file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission. Western offers
nondiscriminatory access to its
transmission system, including requests
to interconnect new generating
resources to its transmission system,
under its OATT.
The Program implements Section 402
of the Recovery Act, which amends
Section 301 of the Hoover Power Plant
Act of 1984. The Program uses the
authority granted under these statutes to
borrow up to $3.25 billion from the U.S.
Department of the Treasury to develop
new or upgraded electric power
transmission lines and related facilities,
with at least one terminus within
Western’s service territory, that delivers
or facilitates the delivery of power
generated by renewable energy
resources.
Western sought public comment on
the policies it proposed to use to
implement its Recovery Act borrowing
authority as announced in a March 4,
2009 Federal Register notice (74 FR
9391). A public comment forum was
held in Lakewood, Colorado, on March
23, 2009, and a transcript and meeting
video were made available through
Western’s Web site. Western received
comments from 40 customers and other
stakeholders. All comments were
reviewed and, where appropriate,
incorporated into the Program. Western
announced the TIP on May 14, 2009 (74
FR 22732) (‘‘the May 2009 Notice’’). In
the May 2009 Notice, Western
established policies on project funding,
project evaluation, project development,
operations and maintenance, and
project rates and repayment.
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to implement
updates to the Program as set forth in
this FRN.
Since 2012, Western has engaged in
an internal review of the Program to
evaluate its current project development
and financing practices and to identify
areas where the Program could be
improved. As a result of this process
Western seeks to achieve: (1) More
efficient screening of projects, (2)
increased transparency of the process
used to review and evaluate projects, (3)
improved communications with project
applicants, and (4) additional interest
from potential applicants that seek
Western’s assistance to develop a
project and use Western’s borrowing
authority to obtain project funding.
Table of Contents
I. Definitions
II. Principles
III. Project Evaluation Criteria
IV. Project Life-Cycle Overview
V. Funding During the Project Development
Phase
VI. Reaffirmation of Project Development,
Operations & Maintenance, and Project
Rates and Repayment
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Definitions
Advanced Funding Agreement (AFA):
The document that sets forth the terms
by which the Project Applicant provides
advance funds to Western for
development work on an Eligible
Project. An AFA is executed after TIP
has reviewed and accepted a Project
Applicant’s Business Plan Proposal.
Business Plan Proposal: The
document prepared by the Project
Applicant that articulates project
development, commercial, and financial
plans supported by Financial Model
projections. The Business Plan Proposal
is a preliminary plan that identifies the
conditions precedent required for a
Project Applicant to apply for financing.
Submitted after Western and the Project
Applicant have entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding, a
Business Plan Proposal is a detailed,
comprehensive document that will
mature and be revised by the Project
Applicant prior to submission of a loan
application.
Project Development Phase: The
phase of the project that precedes the
Project Finance Phase and construction
of the project. The Project Development
Phase begins when a Project Applicant
submits a Statement of Interest and
concludes when a Project Applicant
submits an application for the use of
Western’s borrowing authority. The
Project Development Phase may include
activities associated with facilities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
studies, Western Electricity
Coordinating Council (WECC) path
rating, environmental review, design of
facilities, obtaining necessary permits,
negotiation and execution of
commercial agreements, acquisition of
external financing, and any other
activity that must be completed prior to
the start of construction. The Program
offers Project Applicants assistance
during this phase.
DOE Loan Programs Office (LPO): A
program within the Department of
Energy. DOE LPO performs
underwriting and loan monitoring and
administration functions.
Eligible Project: A project that: (1)
Delivers or facilitates the delivery of
renewable energy resources, (2) has one
terminus in Western’s service territory,
(3) can demonstrate a reasonable
expectation of repayment, (4) will not
adversely impact system reliability or
operations, and (5) is in the public
interest.
Financial Model: A model that
includes a simulation of relevant costs,
benefits, values, and risks that will be
assessed when making financial
decisions affecting a project. Financial
Models submitted to TIP must be in
Microsoft Excel and use standard
industry conventions or templates
provided by Western.
Project Finance Phase: The Project
Finance Phase involves the
underwriting, financing, and loan
monitoring and servicing for an Eligible
Project. With few exceptions, it follows
completion of the Project Development
Phase. The DOE LPO is responsible for
administering the Project Finance
Phase.
Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU): The standard document that sets
forth an understanding between
Western and a Project Applicant after
Western has approved the applicant’s
Statement of Interest. An MOU precedes
the applicant’s submission of a Business
Plan Proposal.
Project Applicant: Term used to refer
to an entity that submits a Statement of
Interest and Business Plan Proposal.
Statement of Interest (SOI): The
document submitted by a Project
Applicant that outlines its proposed
project. The first step in the TIP
Development Phase, an SOI is limited to
10 pages. An SOI must, at a minimum,
include a detailed description of the
proposed project (including
transmission route information, if
applicable, and a preliminary business
model), the proposed role that TIP
would play in project development, and
sufficient information to demonstrate
that the project meets or is reasonably
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59667
expected to meet Western’s Project
Evaluation Criteria.
II. Principles
In the May 2009 Notice, Western
identified the principles it would use to
guide implementation of its borrowing
authority. Application of the Programrelated principles ensures, among other
things, that the Program is separate and
distinct from Western’s power
marketing functions and that each
project stands on its own for loan
repayment purposes. Western hereby
reaffirms the Program-related principles
set forth in the May 2009 Notice. For
convenience, the Program-related
principles are set forth below.
Consistent with its borrowing
authority, Western will be guided by the
following Program related principals:
1. Provide opportunities, where
appropriate, for participation by other
entities in constructing, financing,
owning, facilitating, planning,
operating, maintaining or studying
construction of new or upgraded electric
power transmission lines and related
facilities.
2. Use revenue from an individual
project developed under the Program as
the only source to:
a. repay the project loan made by
Western;
b. pay project-related ancillary
services and operation and maintenance
expenses; and
c. pay for ancillary services provided
by an existing Federal power system.
3. Use appropriate accounting
controls to treat each transmission line
and related facility that receives
borrowing authority separately and
distinctly from each other and all other
Western power and transmission
facilities.
4. Ensure project beneficiaries repay
project costs.
III. Project Evaluation Criteria
Consistent with the requirements set
forth in the Recovery Act, Western will
use the following criteria in evaluating
projects:
1. Facilitates the delivery to market of
power generated by renewable resources
constructed or reasonably expected to
be constructed.
2. Has at least one terminus within
Western’s service territory.
3. Establishes the reasonable
expectation that the project will
generate enough transmission service
revenue to repay the principle
investment, all operating costs
including overhead, and accrued
interest by the end of the project’s
service life.
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
59668
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
4. Will not adversely impact system
reliability or operations, or other
statutory obligations.
5. Is in the public interest.
IV. Project Life-Cycle Overview
Based on its experience to date, the
Program anticipates that the majority of
Eligible Projects will require some
project development (e.g.,
environmental permitting,
establishment of WECC path rating, and
technical design work) before a loan can
be issued using Western’s borrowing
authority. With this in mind, Western’s
involvement in each project is divided
into two general phases—the Project
Development Phase and the Project
Finance Phase. Though there may be
exceptions (e.g., a project that needs no
development work), the expectation is
that each project will complete the
Project Development Phase and the
underwriting and execution stages of
the Project Finance Phase before it
receives funding under the borrowing
authority. Projects that receive funding
under the borrowing authority enter a
loan monitoring stage until all payments
and other amounts due have been
repaid.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Project Development Phase
The Project Development Phase
involves the origination and
development work for a potential
project. This phase is divided into three
parts: (1) Project introduction, which
involves the initial intake and
evaluation of an SOI; (2) project
initiation, which involves the
development of a more substantial
business proposal and initiation of due
diligence for each project that advances
beyond an SOI; and (3) project
development, which involves a review
of the proposed baseline project plan
and budget as well as the development
of major project decision milestones for
each project that advances beyond the
business proposal stage. The elements of
the Project Development Phase and
relevant procedures are explained
below.
1. Statement of Interest
The review process begins when a
Project Applicant submits an SOI.
Western will post instructions on
submitting SOIs on its Web site. On or
about the beginning of each quarter
(approximately January 1, April 1, July
1, and October 1), Western will screen
SOIs received during the previous
quarter for purposes of determining
whether or not each proposed project
meets or is reasonably expected to meet
the Project Evaluation Criteria (see
Section III above). Western may contact
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Project Applicants for clarifications
during the review period, but will not
engage in material discussions about an
SOI. Western will make its
determination no later than 30 days
after the beginning of each quarter.
If Western determines that an SOI
does not or is not expected to meet all
of the Project Evaluation Criteria, it will
inform the Project Applicant in writing
of the proposal’s deficiencies and take
no further action on the proposal.
Project Applicants who submit an SOI
that does not comport with the Project
Evaluation Criteria will be invited to
submit a revised SOI as early as the next
quarterly review if they so choose. If
Western determines that an SOI meets
the Project Evaluation Criteria, the
proposed project will be deemed an
Eligible Project and will be assigned to
the development queue, and the Project
Applicant will be offered the
opportunity to enter into an MOU with
Western. Because projects will possess
varying degrees of maturity, a project
may remain in the development queue
until Western—after engaging in
discussions with the Project
Applicant—determines that the project
is sufficiently developed to proceed to
the Business Plan Proposal stage.
The Project Applicant is responsible
for the costs associated with Western’s
review of an SOI. Those costs are
addressed in Section V below.
2. Memorandum of Understanding
Project Applicants who submit an SOI
that meets or is reasonably expected to
meet the Project Evaluation Criteria will
be offered the opportunity to enter into
an MOU with Western. The MOU is a
standard document that, among other
things, establishes the relationship
among the parties, funding obligations
for the submission of a Business Plan
Proposal, confidentiality provisions,
and the making of public statements
regarding a project. The execution of an
MOU does not imply that Western has
approved a project for use of Western’s
borrowing authority. It does, however,
represent Western’s intent to move
forward with its review and evaluation
of the project for purposes of
determining whether or not to
participate in project development
activities. Upon entering into an MOU,
either party may terminate the
document for any reason.
Western will post a model MOU on its
Web site. A Project Applicant may take
up to six months to enter into an MOU
with Western after receiving
confirmation that its SOI has been
approved.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Business Plan Proposal
The Business Plan Proposal explains
a project’s development, commercial,
and financial plans supported by
Financial Model projections. A Business
Plan Proposal is a preliminary plan that
may lead to the determination that a
project is financially, technically,
commercially, and legally viable and
thus, appropriate to proceed on to
development. A Business Plan Proposal
also addresses anticipated conditions
precedent that a commercial lender
would require in a loan application. It
is expected that a Business Plan
Proposal submitted for development
assistance will mature and be revised by
the Project Applicant prior to
submission of a loan application.
At a minimum, it is expected that a
Business Plan Proposal will include the
following information:
• A comprehensive project
description that includes the history of
the project to date.
• The names of all investors, partners,
joint ventures, and other entities with a
financial or legal interest in the
proposed project.
• The status of all efforts to obtain
project funding from other sources.
• Information to assess the financial
viability of the proposed project,
including audited financial statements
and reports of the Project Applicant and
any other investors in the project and
detailed Financial Models.
• The Project Applicant’s recent and
relevant experience in developing
projects of similar size and scope.
• A plan for how the Project
Applicant expects to generate revenue
from the project to:
(1) Repay principal and interest
associated with a loan from Western’s
borrowing authority, and
(2) pay for project-related ancillary
services and operations and
maintenance expenses.
• A detailed analysis of any impact
that the proposed project may have on
the reliability of the integrated electrical
grid.
• An explanation of how the project
will obtain and deliver generationrelated ancillary services (if
appropriate).
• An independent analysis of any
new technologies to be employed as part
of the project.
• All known material economic, legal,
and other risks that may have an effect
on the project.
• A listing of all TIP developmentrelated services that the Project
Applicant seeks to obtain.
• Relevant information concerning
required approvals, permits, licenses,
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
land rights, and other permissions that
must be obtained on behalf of the
project.
• Detailed project technical
specifications and designs.
• Required interconnections and path
ratings.
Western will perform a due diligence
review of a Business Plan Proposal to
determine if the proposal is deficient in
these or any other material respects. It
will notify the Project Applicant in
writing and work with the applicant to
remedy any deficiencies. When Western
determines that the Business Plan
Proposal adequately addresses all
technical, commercial, and financial
aspects of a proposed project and
contains the requisite Financial Models,
it will invite the Project Applicant to
enter into an AFA.
A Project Applicant may take up to 12
months to submit a Business Plan
Proposal after signing an MOU with
Western. Due to the varying nature and
complexity of Business Plan Proposals,
Western will not establish a firm fixed
time frame for reviewing such
documents but will endeavor to
complete its review expeditiously while
keeping the Project Applicant apprised
of its progress.
The Project Applicant is responsible
for the costs associated with Western’s
review of a Business Plan Proposal.
Those costs are addressed in Section V
below.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4. Advance Funding Agreement
An AFA is an agreement that sets
forth the terms under which Western
will participate in the development of a
project. The terms of an AFA call upon
a Project Applicant to advance a
mutually-agreed amount to cover costs
Western incurs in performing project
development activities as set forth in the
document. No work will commence
without receipt of advance payment.
The AFA also provides that if there are
insufficient funds to cover Western’s
project-related development expenses,
Western will inform the Project
Applicant of the insufficiency and
request additional funding.
TIP will post a model AFA on its Web
site.
5. Project Development
Once an AFA is executed, the parties
begin to perform project developmentrelated activities. These activities often
include facilities studies and designs;
establishment of a WECC path rating;
environmental, cultural, endangered
species, and other assessments;
negotiation and execution of
commercial agreements; acquisition of
external financing for construction;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
negotiation of the project ownership
structure; any needed interconnection
agreements; and Western’s continued
performance of due diligence as it
relates to the project and any other
activity that must be completed prior to
the start of construction. Depending on
the nature of the project and the amount
of development that has already
occurred, the Project Development
Phase is likely to vary in length from
less than a year to several years.
B. Transition From Project Development
Phase to Project Finance Phase
Western, in consultation with LPO,
will determine when a project has
completed the Project Development
Phase and will coordinate with LPO
regarding the transition of a project from
the Project Development Phase to the
Project Finance Phase.
C. Project Finance Phase
The Project Finance Phase involves
the underwriting, financing, and loan
monitoring and servicing for a project.
This phase can generally be divided into
three parts: (1) Project underwriting,
which involves submission by an
applicant of a completed loan
application and business plan, the
completion of extensive due diligence
and financial modeling by LPO and its
advisors, and negotiation of a term sheet
and conditional commitment containing
the material business and legal terms of
a possible financing transaction; (2) for
any project that proceeds beyond
underwriting, project execution, which
involves the negotiation and
documentation of definitive loan
documents and any other agreements
and instruments required for the
financing of the project, as well as the
closing of such financing; and (3) for
any project that achieves execution,
project implementation, which involves
the actual implementation and funding
disbursements in accordance with the
loan documents as well as loan
servicing and monitoring activities.
V. Funding During the Project
Development Phase
A. Policies and Procedures
1. Accounting Principles
Western will use generally accepted
accounting principles and practices in
recording and tracking all expenses and
revenue transactions for each project.
2. Program Funding
The Program must be financially selfsustaining. As such, expenses incurred
by Western in reviewing SOIs and
evaluating Business Plan Proposals
must be borne by Project Applicants.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59669
Similarly, Project Applicants must
provide adequate advance funding for
services performed by Program
personnel or contractors during the
Project Development Phase.
3. Allocation of Expenses—SOI
a. Based on Western’s experience, it
estimates that it will cost approximately
$50,000 to review and screen an SOI.
Therefore, Project Applicants shall
make a one-time $50,000 payment to the
Program at the time an SOI is submitted
to cover costs related to the SOI review.
Project Applicants should contact the
TIP office to make arrangements for this
payment. Failure to make this payment
will result in Western taking no action
to review and screen the SOI.
b. If, in the course of reviewing the
SOI, Western determines that there are
insufficient funds to cover its
anticipated expenses, Western will
promptly inform the Project Applicant
of the insufficiency and request
adequate additional funding to complete
its review. If an SOI does not meet or
is reasonably expected to not meet all of
the Project Evaluation Criteria, leading
Western to conclude that no further
action on the project proposal is
required, any funds paid by the Project
Applicant in excess of actual costs
incurred by Western in reviewing the
proposal will be returned to the Project
Applicant.
4. Allocation of Expenses—Business
Plan Proposal
a. Based on its experience, Western
estimates that it will cost approximately
$250,000 to review and evaluate a
Business Plan Proposal. Therefore,
Project Applicants shall make a onetime $250,000 payment to Western at
the time a Business Plan Proposal is
submitted to cover costs related to the
Business Plan Proposal review and
evaluation. Failure to include this
payment with the submission of a
Business Plan Proposal will result in
Western taking no action to review and
evaluate the proposal. Project
Applicants should contact the TIP office
to make arrangements for making this
advance. The Project Applicant may
elect to apply funds remaining (if any)
from its $50,000 SOI submission
payment that are in Western’s control to
the $250,000 Business Plan Proposal
charge.
b. If, in the course of reviewing and
evaluating the Business Plan Proposal,
Western determines that there are
insufficient funds to cover Western’s
anticipated project-related expenses,
Western will inform the Project
Applicant of the insufficiency and
request adequate additional funding to
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
59670
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
complete its review. If a Business Plan
Proposal does not lead to the
determination that a project is
financially, technically, and
commercially viable and ready to
proceed to development, Western will
notify the Project Applicant and any
funds paid by the Project Applicant in
excess of actual costs incurred by
Western in evaluating the proposal will
be returned to the Project Applicant.
5. Allocation of Expenses—AFA
As part of the AFA, Western and the
Project Applicant will mutually agree
on an amount to cover costs associated
with project development activities
performed by Western. The Project
Applicant may elect to apply funds
remaining (if any) from its $250,000
Business Plan Proposal payment that are
in Western’s control to the mutually
agreed upon amount.
VI. Reaffirmation of Project
Development and Operations &
Maintenance, and Project Rates and
Repayment Policies and Practices
Western reaffirms the Project
Development and Operations &
Maintenance, and Project Rates and
Repayment Policies and Practices set
forth in the May 2009 Notice.
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and the DOE
NEPA Implementing Procedures and
Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021), Western
has determined that this action fits
within category A13, Procedural
Documents, of Appendix A to Subpart
D of Part 1021 and is categorically
excluded from NEPA analysis. Future
actions under this authority will
undergo appropriate NEPA analysis.
Dated: September 6, 2013.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–23604 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0674; FRL–9533–2]
Information Collection Request
Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request;
Notification of Substantial Risk of
Injury to Health and the Environment
Under TSCA Section 8(e)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency has submitted an information
collection request (ICR), ‘‘Notification of
Substantial Risk of Injury to Health and
the Environment under TSCA Section
8(e)’’ (EPA ICR No. 0794.13, OMB
Control No. 2070–0046) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). This is a renewal of the
ICR that is currently approved through
June 30, 2013. Public comments were
previously requested via the Federal
Register (77 FR 71415) on November 30,
2012, during a 60-day comment period.
The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information
collection activity and its expected
burden and costs. Copies of the ICR and
related documents are available in the
docket.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before October 28,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID Number EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2012–0674, to (1) EPA
online using https://www.regulations.gov
(our preferred method), by email to
oppt.ncic@epa.gov or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Myrick, Deputy Director,
Environmental Assistance Division,
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Mail code: 7408–M,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–554–
1404; fax number: 202–564–8251; email
address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents which explain
in detail the information that the EPA
will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket
can be viewed online at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is 202–566–1744.
For additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Abstract: Section 8(e) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires
that any person who manufactures,
imports, processes or distributes in
commerce a chemical substance or
mixture and which obtains information
that reasonably supports the conclusion
that such substance or mixture presents
a substantial risk of injury to health or
the environment must immediately
inform EPA of such information. EPA
routinely disseminates TSCA section
8(e) data it receives to other Federal
agencies to provide information about
newly discovered chemical hazards and
risks. This information collection
addresses the burden associated with
industry reporting of such notifications.
The respondent may claim all or part of
a notice confidential. EPA will disclose
information that is covered by a claim
of confidentiality only to the extent
permitted by, and in accordance with,
the procedures in TSCA and 40 CFR
Part 2.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: Entities
potentially affected by this action are
companies that manufacture, process,
import or distribute in commerce a
chemical substance or mixture and that
obtain information that reasonably
supports the conclusion that such
substance or mixture presents a
substantial risk of injury to health or the
environment.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
mandatory; see 15 USC 2607(e).
Estimated number of respondents:
555 (total).
Frequency of response: On occasion.
Total estimated burden: 19,659 hours
per year. Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b).
Total estimated burden cost:
$1,366,491 per year, includes $0
annualized capital or operation and
maintenance costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease of 10,856 hours in the total
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59666-59670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23604]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Transmission Infrastructure Program; Proposed Transmission
Infrastructure Program Updates and Request for Comments
AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power Administration (``Western'') hereby
announces updates to its Transmission Infrastructure Program (``the
Program'' or TIP). The Program implements Section 402 of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (``Recovery Act'') regarding
loans for the purpose of: (1) Constructing, financing, facilitating,
planning, operating, maintaining, or studying construction of new or
upgraded electric power transmission lines and related facilities with
at least one terminus within Western's service territory, and (2)
delivering or facilitating the delivery of power generated by renewable
energy resources constructed, or reasonably expected to be constructed,
after the date that the Recovery Act was enacted.
Through this Federal Register notice (FRN), Western seeks public
comment on proposed updates to the Program. The proposed updates will
create a more efficient and transparent process to screen and evaluate
potential projects, improve communications with project applicants,
promote additional interest from potential applicants that seek
Western's assistance to develop a project and use Western's Recovery
Act borrowing authority, and integrate the DOE Loan Programs Office
into the process. The FRN also identifies the principles Western will
continue using to ensure (1) that the Program is separate and distinct
from Western's power marketing functions, and (2) that each eligible
TIP project stands on its own for repayment purposes.
DATES: The comment period begins September 27, 2013 and ends October
28, 2013. Western will accept written comments at any time during the
consultation and comment period but no later than October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Transmission Infrastructure
Program, Western Area Power Administration, P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood,
CO 80228-8213, email TXRFI@wapa.gov. Western will post information
about Program developments on its Web site at https://ww2.wapa.gov/sites/western/recovery/Pages/default.aspx, including written comments
received in response to this FRN after the close of the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Mr. John Kral,
Transmission Infrastructure Program, Western Area Power Administration,
P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood, CO 80228, telephone (720) 962-7710, email
TXRFI@wapa.gov. This FRN is also available on Western's Web site at
https://ww2.wapa.gov/sites/western/recovery/Pages/default.aspx.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Western markets and transmits wholesale hydroelectric power
generated at Federal dams across the western United States. Western's
transmission system was developed to deliver Federal hydroelectric
power to preference customers. Western owns and operates a transmission
system with more than 17,000 circuit-mile, high-voltage lines and also
markets power across 15 western states and a 1.3 million square-mile
service area. Western's service area encompasses all of the following
states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming; and parts of Iowa,
Kansas, Montana, Minnesota, and Texas.
Western markets excess capacity on its transmission system
consistent with the policies and procedures outlined in its Open Access
Transmission Tariff (OATT) on file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission. Western offers nondiscriminatory access to its transmission
system, including requests to interconnect new generating resources to
its transmission system, under its OATT.
The Program implements Section 402 of the Recovery Act, which
amends Section 301 of the Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984. The Program
uses the authority granted under these statutes to borrow up to $3.25
billion from the U.S. Department of the Treasury to develop new or
upgraded electric power transmission lines and related facilities, with
at least one terminus within Western's service territory, that delivers
or facilitates the delivery of power generated by renewable energy
resources.
Western sought public comment on the policies it proposed to use to
implement its Recovery Act borrowing authority as announced in a March
4, 2009 Federal Register notice (74 FR 9391). A public comment forum
was held in Lakewood, Colorado, on March 23, 2009, and a transcript and
meeting video were made available through Western's Web site. Western
received comments from 40 customers and other stakeholders. All
comments were reviewed and, where appropriate, incorporated into the
Program. Western announced the TIP on May 14, 2009 (74 FR 22732) (``the
May 2009 Notice''). In the May 2009 Notice, Western established
policies on project funding, project evaluation, project development,
operations and maintenance, and project rates and repayment.
[[Page 59667]]
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to implement updates to the Program as set
forth in this FRN.
Since 2012, Western has engaged in an internal review of the
Program to evaluate its current project development and financing
practices and to identify areas where the Program could be improved. As
a result of this process Western seeks to achieve: (1) More efficient
screening of projects, (2) increased transparency of the process used
to review and evaluate projects, (3) improved communications with
project applicants, and (4) additional interest from potential
applicants that seek Western's assistance to develop a project and use
Western's borrowing authority to obtain project funding.
Table of Contents
I. Definitions
II. Principles
III. Project Evaluation Criteria
IV. Project Life-Cycle Overview
V. Funding During the Project Development Phase
VI. Reaffirmation of Project Development, Operations & Maintenance,
and Project Rates and Repayment
I. Definitions
Advanced Funding Agreement (AFA): The document that sets forth the
terms by which the Project Applicant provides advance funds to Western
for development work on an Eligible Project. An AFA is executed after
TIP has reviewed and accepted a Project Applicant's Business Plan
Proposal.
Business Plan Proposal: The document prepared by the Project
Applicant that articulates project development, commercial, and
financial plans supported by Financial Model projections. The Business
Plan Proposal is a preliminary plan that identifies the conditions
precedent required for a Project Applicant to apply for financing.
Submitted after Western and the Project Applicant have entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding, a Business Plan Proposal is a detailed,
comprehensive document that will mature and be revised by the Project
Applicant prior to submission of a loan application.
Project Development Phase: The phase of the project that precedes
the Project Finance Phase and construction of the project. The Project
Development Phase begins when a Project Applicant submits a Statement
of Interest and concludes when a Project Applicant submits an
application for the use of Western's borrowing authority. The Project
Development Phase may include activities associated with facilities
studies, Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) path rating,
environmental review, design of facilities, obtaining necessary
permits, negotiation and execution of commercial agreements,
acquisition of external financing, and any other activity that must be
completed prior to the start of construction. The Program offers
Project Applicants assistance during this phase.
DOE Loan Programs Office (LPO): A program within the Department of
Energy. DOE LPO performs underwriting and loan monitoring and
administration functions.
Eligible Project: A project that: (1) Delivers or facilitates the
delivery of renewable energy resources, (2) has one terminus in
Western's service territory, (3) can demonstrate a reasonable
expectation of repayment, (4) will not adversely impact system
reliability or operations, and (5) is in the public interest.
Financial Model: A model that includes a simulation of relevant
costs, benefits, values, and risks that will be assessed when making
financial decisions affecting a project. Financial Models submitted to
TIP must be in Microsoft Excel and use standard industry conventions or
templates provided by Western.
Project Finance Phase: The Project Finance Phase involves the
underwriting, financing, and loan monitoring and servicing for an
Eligible Project. With few exceptions, it follows completion of the
Project Development Phase. The DOE LPO is responsible for administering
the Project Finance Phase.
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): The standard document that sets
forth an understanding between Western and a Project Applicant after
Western has approved the applicant's Statement of Interest. An MOU
precedes the applicant's submission of a Business Plan Proposal.
Project Applicant: Term used to refer to an entity that submits a
Statement of Interest and Business Plan Proposal.
Statement of Interest (SOI): The document submitted by a Project
Applicant that outlines its proposed project. The first step in the TIP
Development Phase, an SOI is limited to 10 pages. An SOI must, at a
minimum, include a detailed description of the proposed project
(including transmission route information, if applicable, and a
preliminary business model), the proposed role that TIP would play in
project development, and sufficient information to demonstrate that the
project meets or is reasonably expected to meet Western's Project
Evaluation Criteria.
II. Principles
In the May 2009 Notice, Western identified the principles it would
use to guide implementation of its borrowing authority. Application of
the Program-related principles ensures, among other things, that the
Program is separate and distinct from Western's power marketing
functions and that each project stands on its own for loan repayment
purposes. Western hereby reaffirms the Program-related principles set
forth in the May 2009 Notice. For convenience, the Program-related
principles are set forth below.
Consistent with its borrowing authority, Western will be guided by
the following Program related principals:
1. Provide opportunities, where appropriate, for participation by
other entities in constructing, financing, owning, facilitating,
planning, operating, maintaining or studying construction of new or
upgraded electric power transmission lines and related facilities.
2. Use revenue from an individual project developed under the
Program as the only source to:
a. repay the project loan made by Western;
b. pay project-related ancillary services and operation and
maintenance expenses; and
c. pay for ancillary services provided by an existing Federal power
system.
3. Use appropriate accounting controls to treat each transmission
line and related facility that receives borrowing authority separately
and distinctly from each other and all other Western power and
transmission facilities.
4. Ensure project beneficiaries repay project costs.
III. Project Evaluation Criteria
Consistent with the requirements set forth in the Recovery Act,
Western will use the following criteria in evaluating projects:
1. Facilitates the delivery to market of power generated by
renewable resources constructed or reasonably expected to be
constructed.
2. Has at least one terminus within Western's service territory.
3. Establishes the reasonable expectation that the project will
generate enough transmission service revenue to repay the principle
investment, all operating costs including overhead, and accrued
interest by the end of the project's service life.
[[Page 59668]]
4. Will not adversely impact system reliability or operations, or
other statutory obligations.
5. Is in the public interest.
IV. Project Life-Cycle Overview
Based on its experience to date, the Program anticipates that the
majority of Eligible Projects will require some project development
(e.g., environmental permitting, establishment of WECC path rating, and
technical design work) before a loan can be issued using Western's
borrowing authority. With this in mind, Western's involvement in each
project is divided into two general phases--the Project Development
Phase and the Project Finance Phase. Though there may be exceptions
(e.g., a project that needs no development work), the expectation is
that each project will complete the Project Development Phase and the
underwriting and execution stages of the Project Finance Phase before
it receives funding under the borrowing authority. Projects that
receive funding under the borrowing authority enter a loan monitoring
stage until all payments and other amounts due have been repaid.
A. Project Development Phase
The Project Development Phase involves the origination and
development work for a potential project. This phase is divided into
three parts: (1) Project introduction, which involves the initial
intake and evaluation of an SOI; (2) project initiation, which involves
the development of a more substantial business proposal and initiation
of due diligence for each project that advances beyond an SOI; and (3)
project development, which involves a review of the proposed baseline
project plan and budget as well as the development of major project
decision milestones for each project that advances beyond the business
proposal stage. The elements of the Project Development Phase and
relevant procedures are explained below.
1. Statement of Interest
The review process begins when a Project Applicant submits an SOI.
Western will post instructions on submitting SOIs on its Web site. On
or about the beginning of each quarter (approximately January 1, April
1, July 1, and October 1), Western will screen SOIs received during the
previous quarter for purposes of determining whether or not each
proposed project meets or is reasonably expected to meet the Project
Evaluation Criteria (see Section III above). Western may contact
Project Applicants for clarifications during the review period, but
will not engage in material discussions about an SOI. Western will make
its determination no later than 30 days after the beginning of each
quarter.
If Western determines that an SOI does not or is not expected to
meet all of the Project Evaluation Criteria, it will inform the Project
Applicant in writing of the proposal's deficiencies and take no further
action on the proposal. Project Applicants who submit an SOI that does
not comport with the Project Evaluation Criteria will be invited to
submit a revised SOI as early as the next quarterly review if they so
choose. If Western determines that an SOI meets the Project Evaluation
Criteria, the proposed project will be deemed an Eligible Project and
will be assigned to the development queue, and the Project Applicant
will be offered the opportunity to enter into an MOU with Western.
Because projects will possess varying degrees of maturity, a project
may remain in the development queue until Western--after engaging in
discussions with the Project Applicant--determines that the project is
sufficiently developed to proceed to the Business Plan Proposal stage.
The Project Applicant is responsible for the costs associated with
Western's review of an SOI. Those costs are addressed in Section V
below.
2. Memorandum of Understanding
Project Applicants who submit an SOI that meets or is reasonably
expected to meet the Project Evaluation Criteria will be offered the
opportunity to enter into an MOU with Western. The MOU is a standard
document that, among other things, establishes the relationship among
the parties, funding obligations for the submission of a Business Plan
Proposal, confidentiality provisions, and the making of public
statements regarding a project. The execution of an MOU does not imply
that Western has approved a project for use of Western's borrowing
authority. It does, however, represent Western's intent to move forward
with its review and evaluation of the project for purposes of
determining whether or not to participate in project development
activities. Upon entering into an MOU, either party may terminate the
document for any reason.
Western will post a model MOU on its Web site. A Project Applicant
may take up to six months to enter into an MOU with Western after
receiving confirmation that its SOI has been approved.
3. Business Plan Proposal
The Business Plan Proposal explains a project's development,
commercial, and financial plans supported by Financial Model
projections. A Business Plan Proposal is a preliminary plan that may
lead to the determination that a project is financially, technically,
commercially, and legally viable and thus, appropriate to proceed on to
development. A Business Plan Proposal also addresses anticipated
conditions precedent that a commercial lender would require in a loan
application. It is expected that a Business Plan Proposal submitted for
development assistance will mature and be revised by the Project
Applicant prior to submission of a loan application.
At a minimum, it is expected that a Business Plan Proposal will
include the following information:
A comprehensive project description that includes the
history of the project to date.
The names of all investors, partners, joint ventures, and
other entities with a financial or legal interest in the proposed
project.
The status of all efforts to obtain project funding from
other sources.
Information to assess the financial viability of the
proposed project, including audited financial statements and reports of
the Project Applicant and any other investors in the project and
detailed Financial Models.
The Project Applicant's recent and relevant experience in
developing projects of similar size and scope.
A plan for how the Project Applicant expects to generate
revenue from the project to:
(1) Repay principal and interest associated with a loan from
Western's borrowing authority, and
(2) pay for project-related ancillary services and operations and
maintenance expenses.
A detailed analysis of any impact that the proposed
project may have on the reliability of the integrated electrical grid.
An explanation of how the project will obtain and deliver
generation-related ancillary services (if appropriate).
An independent analysis of any new technologies to be
employed as part of the project.
All known material economic, legal, and other risks that
may have an effect on the project.
A listing of all TIP development-related services that the
Project Applicant seeks to obtain.
Relevant information concerning required approvals,
permits, licenses,
[[Page 59669]]
land rights, and other permissions that must be obtained on behalf of
the project.
Detailed project technical specifications and designs.
Required interconnections and path ratings.
Western will perform a due diligence review of a Business Plan
Proposal to determine if the proposal is deficient in these or any
other material respects. It will notify the Project Applicant in
writing and work with the applicant to remedy any deficiencies. When
Western determines that the Business Plan Proposal adequately addresses
all technical, commercial, and financial aspects of a proposed project
and contains the requisite Financial Models, it will invite the Project
Applicant to enter into an AFA.
A Project Applicant may take up to 12 months to submit a Business
Plan Proposal after signing an MOU with Western. Due to the varying
nature and complexity of Business Plan Proposals, Western will not
establish a firm fixed time frame for reviewing such documents but will
endeavor to complete its review expeditiously while keeping the Project
Applicant apprised of its progress.
The Project Applicant is responsible for the costs associated with
Western's review of a Business Plan Proposal. Those costs are addressed
in Section V below.
4. Advance Funding Agreement
An AFA is an agreement that sets forth the terms under which
Western will participate in the development of a project. The terms of
an AFA call upon a Project Applicant to advance a mutually-agreed
amount to cover costs Western incurs in performing project development
activities as set forth in the document. No work will commence without
receipt of advance payment. The AFA also provides that if there are
insufficient funds to cover Western's project-related development
expenses, Western will inform the Project Applicant of the
insufficiency and request additional funding.
TIP will post a model AFA on its Web site.
5. Project Development
Once an AFA is executed, the parties begin to perform project
development-related activities. These activities often include
facilities studies and designs; establishment of a WECC path rating;
environmental, cultural, endangered species, and other assessments;
negotiation and execution of commercial agreements; acquisition of
external financing for construction; negotiation of the project
ownership structure; any needed interconnection agreements; and
Western's continued performance of due diligence as it relates to the
project and any other activity that must be completed prior to the
start of construction. Depending on the nature of the project and the
amount of development that has already occurred, the Project
Development Phase is likely to vary in length from less than a year to
several years.
B. Transition From Project Development Phase to Project Finance Phase
Western, in consultation with LPO, will determine when a project
has completed the Project Development Phase and will coordinate with
LPO regarding the transition of a project from the Project Development
Phase to the Project Finance Phase.
C. Project Finance Phase
The Project Finance Phase involves the underwriting, financing, and
loan monitoring and servicing for a project. This phase can generally
be divided into three parts: (1) Project underwriting, which involves
submission by an applicant of a completed loan application and business
plan, the completion of extensive due diligence and financial modeling
by LPO and its advisors, and negotiation of a term sheet and
conditional commitment containing the material business and legal terms
of a possible financing transaction; (2) for any project that proceeds
beyond underwriting, project execution, which involves the negotiation
and documentation of definitive loan documents and any other agreements
and instruments required for the financing of the project, as well as
the closing of such financing; and (3) for any project that achieves
execution, project implementation, which involves the actual
implementation and funding disbursements in accordance with the loan
documents as well as loan servicing and monitoring activities.
V. Funding During the Project Development Phase
A. Policies and Procedures
1. Accounting Principles
Western will use generally accepted accounting principles and
practices in recording and tracking all expenses and revenue
transactions for each project.
2. Program Funding
The Program must be financially self-sustaining. As such, expenses
incurred by Western in reviewing SOIs and evaluating Business Plan
Proposals must be borne by Project Applicants. Similarly, Project
Applicants must provide adequate advance funding for services performed
by Program personnel or contractors during the Project Development
Phase.
3. Allocation of Expenses--SOI
a. Based on Western's experience, it estimates that it will cost
approximately $50,000 to review and screen an SOI. Therefore, Project
Applicants shall make a one-time $50,000 payment to the Program at the
time an SOI is submitted to cover costs related to the SOI review.
Project Applicants should contact the TIP office to make arrangements
for this payment. Failure to make this payment will result in Western
taking no action to review and screen the SOI.
b. If, in the course of reviewing the SOI, Western determines that
there are insufficient funds to cover its anticipated expenses, Western
will promptly inform the Project Applicant of the insufficiency and
request adequate additional funding to complete its review. If an SOI
does not meet or is reasonably expected to not meet all of the Project
Evaluation Criteria, leading Western to conclude that no further action
on the project proposal is required, any funds paid by the Project
Applicant in excess of actual costs incurred by Western in reviewing
the proposal will be returned to the Project Applicant.
4. Allocation of Expenses--Business Plan Proposal
a. Based on its experience, Western estimates that it will cost
approximately $250,000 to review and evaluate a Business Plan Proposal.
Therefore, Project Applicants shall make a one-time $250,000 payment to
Western at the time a Business Plan Proposal is submitted to cover
costs related to the Business Plan Proposal review and evaluation.
Failure to include this payment with the submission of a Business Plan
Proposal will result in Western taking no action to review and evaluate
the proposal. Project Applicants should contact the TIP office to make
arrangements for making this advance. The Project Applicant may elect
to apply funds remaining (if any) from its $50,000 SOI submission
payment that are in Western's control to the $250,000 Business Plan
Proposal charge.
b. If, in the course of reviewing and evaluating the Business Plan
Proposal, Western determines that there are insufficient funds to cover
Western's anticipated project-related expenses, Western will inform the
Project Applicant of the insufficiency and request adequate additional
funding to
[[Page 59670]]
complete its review. If a Business Plan Proposal does not lead to the
determination that a project is financially, technically, and
commercially viable and ready to proceed to development, Western will
notify the Project Applicant and any funds paid by the Project
Applicant in excess of actual costs incurred by Western in evaluating
the proposal will be returned to the Project Applicant.
5. Allocation of Expenses--AFA
As part of the AFA, Western and the Project Applicant will mutually
agree on an amount to cover costs associated with project development
activities performed by Western. The Project Applicant may elect to
apply funds remaining (if any) from its $250,000 Business Plan Proposal
payment that are in Western's control to the mutually agreed upon
amount.
VI. Reaffirmation of Project Development and Operations & Maintenance,
and Project Rates and Repayment Policies and Practices
Western reaffirms the Project Development and Operations &
Maintenance, and Project Rates and Repayment Policies and Practices set
forth in the May 2009 Notice.
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and the DOE
NEPA Implementing Procedures and Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021), Western
has determined that this action fits within category A13, Procedural
Documents, of Appendix A to Subpart D of Part 1021 and is categorically
excluded from NEPA analysis. Future actions under this authority will
undergo appropriate NEPA analysis.
Dated: September 6, 2013.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-23604 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P