Notice of Availability of the North Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 59713-59714 [2013-23485]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
riparian areas and upland habitats,
including sagebrush habitat.
• Sagebrush—treatments in sagebrush
habitats would focus on restoring the
sagebrush community by removing
encroaching pinyon-juniper, promoting
the reestablishment of native forbs and
grasses in sagebrush communities, and
promoting the development of
sagebrush in areas where it occurred
historically.
The proposed 3 Bars Project has been
identified by the BLM as a major
Federal action and is appropriately
analyzed by an EIS. The 3 Bars Project
Draft EIS identifies and evaluates
treatment alternatives to implement the
proposed project to meet resource
management goals. In addition to the
All Available Methods Alternative,
three other alternatives are analyzed in
the Draft EIS. The No Fire Use
Alternative would target the same
treatment areas, but the methods of
treatment would not include prescribed
fire or wildland fire for resource benefit.
The Minimal Land Disturbance
Alternative also targets the same areas
for treatment, but further limits the
methods of treatment to exclude fire
use, mechanical treatments, and nonclassical biological controls. The BLM
anticipates that more acres would be
treated under the preferred alternative
due to the lower cost of some of the
treatment methods that would not be
available under the other alternatives. A
No Action alternative has also been
included for comparison purposes with
existing management conditions. Three
additional alternatives were considered
but eliminated from detailed analysis.
The BLM has prepared the Draft EIS
in conjunction with its three
cooperating agencies: The Nevada
Department of Wildlife, Eureka County
Board of Commissioners, and the
National Park Service—National Trails
Intermountain Region.
On January 25, 2010, the BLM
published a Notice of Intent (75 FR
3916) to initiate scoping for the
preparation of the EIS. The scoping
period ended March 10, 2010. Public
scoping meetings were held in Battle
Mountain, Nevada, on February 22 and
Eureka, Nevada on February 23, 2010.
The BLM received 24 scoping comment
letters on the proposed 3 Bars Project.
In addition, comments were recorded
during informal discussions with the
public at the public scoping meetings.
Based on written and oral comments
given during the scoping period, 637
catalogued individual comments were
recorded during scoping for the 3 Bars
Project EIS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Vegetation treatment planning and
management and vegetation treatment
methods were the primary topics of
concern to the public. Respondents
were also concerned with the impacts
that treatment actions would have on
the spread of invasive species, the
viability of wild horses and livestock,
preservation of old growth woodlands,
and protection of habitat for wildlife
and special status species. All relevant
issues identified through public scoping
have been analyzed in this EIS to the
extent practicable. The Draft EIS
describes and analyzes the proposed
project’s site-specific impacts (including
cumulative) on all affected resources.
Three action alternatives (including the
preferred alternative) were analyzed in
addition to the No-Action Alternative
and three alternatives were considered
but eliminated from further analysis.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses, and email addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10.
Christopher J. Cook,
Field Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2013–23484 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLMT923000 L16100000.DP0000]
Notice of Availability of the North
Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse Draft
Resource Management Plan
Amendment and Draft Environmental
Impact Statement
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59713
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared
a North Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse
(GRSG) Draft Resource Management
Plan (RMP) Amendment and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the North Dakota Field Office and by
this notice is announcing the opening of
the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP
Amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days
after the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its notice
of the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS
in the Federal Register. The BLM will
announce future meetings or hearings
and any other public participation
activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases,
and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the North Dakota GRSG Draft
RMP Amendment/Draft EIS by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/mt/
st/en/fo/north_dakota_field.html.
• Email: blm_mt_nd_sage_grouse@
blm.gov.
• Fax: 406–896–5293.
• Mail: BLM—North Dakota Greater
Sage-Grouse EIS, 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings MT 59101.
Copies of the North Dakota GRSG
Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS are
available at the North Dakota Field
Office at: 99 23rd Ave. W., Dickinson,
ND, or on the Web site at: https://
www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/fo/north_
dakota_field.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth Miller, Team Lead, telephone 406–
896–5023; see address and email above.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–253–4093 to contact the
above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
prepared the North Dakota GRSG Draft
RMP Amendment and Draft EIS to
address a range of alternatives focused
on specific conservation measures
across the North Dakota range of the
GRSG. This Draft RMP Amendment/
Draft EIS is one of 15 separate planning
efforts that are being undertaken as part
of the BLM’s and U.S. Forest Service’s
(USFS) National GRSG Planning
Strategy. The Draft RMP Amendment/
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59714
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
Draft EIS proposes to amend the North
Dakota RMP. The current management
decisions for resources are described in
the North Dakota RMP (1988).
The planning area includes
approximately 963,017 acres of BLM,
USFS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
State, and private lands located in
southwestern North Dakota, in three
counties (Bowman, Slope, and Golden
Valley). Within the decision area, the
BLM administers approximately 33,030
surface acres and 396,053 acres of
Federal mineral (subsurface) estate.
Surface management decisions made as
a result of this Draft RMP Amendment/
Draft EIS will apply only to the BLMadministered lands in the decision area.
The decision area is defined as those
BLM-administered lands and Federal
mineral estate within the Planning Area,
which includes two categories of habitat
identified by the BLM and North Dakota
Game and Fish (NDG&F):
• Preliminary Priority Habitat
(PPH)—Areas identified as having the
highest conservation value to
maintaining sustainable GRSG
populations; includes all leks in North
Dakota.
• Preliminary General Habitat
(PGH)—Areas of historic sage-grouse
habitat, which still has some use by
sage-grouse.
The formal public scoping process for
the RMP Amendment/EIS began on
December 9, 2011, with the publication
of a Notice of Intent in the Federal
Register (76 FR 77008), and ended on
March 23, 2012. The BLM held one
scoping open house in North Dakota in
January 2011. The BLM used public
scoping comments to help identify
planning issues that directed the
formulation of alternatives and framed
the scope of analysis in the Draft RMP
Amendment/Draft EIS. The scoping
process was also used to introduce the
public to preliminary planning criteria,
which set limits on the scope of the
Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS.
Major issues considered in the Draft
RMP Amendment/Draft EIS include
special status species management
(GRSG specifically), energy
development, lands and realty
(including transmission), and livestock
grazing.
The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS
evaluates four alternatives in detail,
including the No Action Alternative
(Alternative A) and three action
alternatives (Alternatives B, C and D).
The BLM identified Alternative D as the
preferred alternative. Identification of
this alternative, however, does not
represent final agency direction, and the
Proposed RMP Amendment may reflect
changes or adjustments based on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
information received during public
comment, from new information, or
from changes in BLM policies or
priorities. The Proposed RMP may
include objectives and actions described
in the other analyzed alternatives or
otherwise within the spectrum of
alternatives analyzed.
Alternative A would retain the
current management goals, objectives,
and direction specified in the current
RMP. Alternative B includes
conservation measures from the SageGrouse National Technical Team
Report. Alternative C includes
conservation measures various
conservation groups submitted to the
BLM. Alternative D includes
conservation measures the BLM
developed with the cooperating
agencies.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7–2(b), this
notice announces a concurrent public
comment period on proposed Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC).
One ACEC is proposed in Alternative C.
The Sage-Grouse Habitat ACEC
(approximately 32,900 acres) would
include the following resource use
limitations if it were formally
designated:
• Close to fluid mineral leasing;
• Designate as a Right-of-Way
exclusion area;
• Reduce livestock grazing;
• No roads constructed within 4
miles of a lek;
• Allow vegetation treatments only
for the benefit of GRSG; and
• Recommend for withdrawal from
mineral entry.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses and email addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2.
Theresa M. Hanley,
Acting BLM Montana/Dakotas State Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–23485 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLAK910000 L13100000.DB0000
LXSINSSI0000]
Notice of Public Meeting, North Slope
Science Initiative—Science Technical
Advisory Panel
Bureau of Land Management,
Alaska State Office, North Slope Science
Initiative, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, North Slope
Science Initiative (NSSI)—Science
Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) will
meet as indicated below.
DATES: The meeting will be held
October 28–31, 2013 in Fairbanks,
Alaska. The meetings will begin at 9:00
a.m. in the Akasofu Building,
International Arctic Research Center
(IARC), Room 401, North Koyukuk
Drive, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Public comment will be received
between 3:00 and 4:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
F. Payne, Executive Director, North
Slope Science Initiative, AK–910, c/o
Bureau of Land Management, 222 W.
Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, AK
99513, (907) 271–3431 or email
jpayne@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to leave a message or question
with the above individual. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NSSI
STAP provides advice and
recommendations to the NSSI Oversight
Group regarding priority information
needs for management decisions across
the North Slope of Alaska. These
priority information needs may include
recommendations on inventory,
monitoring, and research activities that
contribute to informed resource
management decisions. This meeting
will include continued dialog for
developing scenario models for the
North Slope and adjacent marine
environments. Additionally, the STAP
will review the progress on a long-term
monitoring strategy for the North Slope.
An interactive session on remote
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59713-59714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23485]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLMT923000 L16100000.DP0000]
Notice of Availability of the North Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse
Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact
Statement
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a
North Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse (GRSG) Draft Resource Management Plan
(RMP) Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the
North Dakota Field Office and by this notice is announcing the opening
of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days
after the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its notice
of the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS in the Federal Register. The BLM
will announce future meetings or hearings and any other public
participation activities at least 15 days in advance through public
notices, media releases, and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments related to the North Dakota GRSG
Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/fo/north_dakota_field.html.
Email: blm_mt_nd_sage_grouse@blm.gov.
Fax: 406-896-5293.
Mail: BLM--North Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse EIS, 5001
Southgate Drive, Billings MT 59101.
Copies of the North Dakota GRSG Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS are
available at the North Dakota Field Office at: 99 23rd Ave. W.,
Dickinson, ND, or on the Web site at: https://www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/fo/north_dakota_field.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Miller, Team Lead, telephone 406-
896-5023; see address and email above. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-253-4093 to contact the above
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM prepared the North Dakota GRSG Draft
RMP Amendment and Draft EIS to address a range of alternatives focused
on specific conservation measures across the North Dakota range of the
GRSG. This Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS is one of 15 separate planning
efforts that are being undertaken as part of the BLM's and U.S. Forest
Service's (USFS) National GRSG Planning Strategy. The Draft RMP
Amendment/
[[Page 59714]]
Draft EIS proposes to amend the North Dakota RMP. The current
management decisions for resources are described in the North Dakota
RMP (1988).
The planning area includes approximately 963,017 acres of BLM,
USFS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State, and private lands located
in southwestern North Dakota, in three counties (Bowman, Slope, and
Golden Valley). Within the decision area, the BLM administers
approximately 33,030 surface acres and 396,053 acres of Federal mineral
(subsurface) estate. Surface management decisions made as a result of
this Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS will apply only to the BLM-
administered lands in the decision area. The decision area is defined
as those BLM-administered lands and Federal mineral estate within the
Planning Area, which includes two categories of habitat identified by
the BLM and North Dakota Game and Fish (NDG&F):
Preliminary Priority Habitat (PPH)--Areas identified as
having the highest conservation value to maintaining sustainable GRSG
populations; includes all leks in North Dakota.
Preliminary General Habitat (PGH)--Areas of historic sage-
grouse habitat, which still has some use by sage-grouse.
The formal public scoping process for the RMP Amendment/EIS began
on December 9, 2011, with the publication of a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register (76 FR 77008), and ended on March 23, 2012. The BLM
held one scoping open house in North Dakota in January 2011. The BLM
used public scoping comments to help identify planning issues that
directed the formulation of alternatives and framed the scope of
analysis in the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS. The scoping process was
also used to introduce the public to preliminary planning criteria,
which set limits on the scope of the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS.
Major issues considered in the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS
include special status species management (GRSG specifically), energy
development, lands and realty (including transmission), and livestock
grazing.
The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS evaluates four alternatives in
detail, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative A) and three
action alternatives (Alternatives B, C and D). The BLM identified
Alternative D as the preferred alternative. Identification of this
alternative, however, does not represent final agency direction, and
the Proposed RMP Amendment may reflect changes or adjustments based on
information received during public comment, from new information, or
from changes in BLM policies or priorities. The Proposed RMP may
include objectives and actions described in the other analyzed
alternatives or otherwise within the spectrum of alternatives analyzed.
Alternative A would retain the current management goals,
objectives, and direction specified in the current RMP. Alternative B
includes conservation measures from the Sage-Grouse National Technical
Team Report. Alternative C includes conservation measures various
conservation groups submitted to the BLM. Alternative D includes
conservation measures the BLM developed with the cooperating agencies.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b), this notice announces a concurrent
public comment period on proposed Areas of Critical Environmental
Concern (ACEC). One ACEC is proposed in Alternative C. The Sage-Grouse
Habitat ACEC (approximately 32,900 acres) would include the following
resource use limitations if it were formally designated:
Close to fluid mineral leasing;
Designate as a Right-of-Way exclusion area;
Reduce livestock grazing;
No roads constructed within 4 miles of a lek;
Allow vegetation treatments only for the benefit of GRSG;
and
Recommend for withdrawal from mineral entry.
Please note that public comments and information submitted
including names, street addresses and email addresses of persons who
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at
the above address during regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2.
Theresa M. Hanley,
Acting BLM Montana/Dakotas State Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-23485 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P