Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape Restoration Project in Eureka County, NV, 59712-59713 [2013-23484]
Download as PDF
59712
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
Type of response
Number of
responses
annually
Time for each
response
(hours)
Annual hour
burden
(column B ×
column C)
(hours)
A.
B.
C.
D.
Land Use Application and Permit, 43 CFR Part 2920 Form 2920–1, Individuals ......................
Land Use Application and Permit, 43 CFR Part 2920, Form 2920–1, State and Local Governments ........................................................................................................................................
Land Use Application and Permit, 43 CFR Part 2920, Form 2920–1, Private Sector/Typical ...
Land Use Application and Permit, 43 CFR Part 2920, Form 2920–1, Private Sector/Complex
66
1
66
45
286
10
1
1
120
45
286
1,200
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
407
........................
1,597
Jean Sonneman,
Bureau of Land Management, Information
Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–23483 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB00000.LF3100000.
DD0000.LFHFJF500000; 13–08807; MO#
4500053474]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape
Restoration Project in Eureka County,
NV
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Battle Mountain
District, Mount Lewis Field Office, has
prepared a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the 3 Bars Ecosystem
and Landscape Restoration Project (3
Bars Project) and by this notice is
announcing the opening of the comment
period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the 3 Bars Project
Draft EIS within 45 days following the
date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register. The
BLM will announce future meetings or
hearings and any other public
involvement activities at least 15 days
in advance through media releases, Web
site postings and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the 3 Bars Project by any of
the following methods:
• Email: 3Bars_Project@blm.gov.
• Fax: 775–635–4034 Attn: Chad
Lewis, 3 Bars Project.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Mail: BLM, Attn: Chad Lewis, 3
Bars Project, 50 Bastian Road, Battle
Mountain, NV 89820.
Copies of the Draft EIS are available
at the BLM Battle Mountain District
Office in Battle Mountain, Nevada. The
document can also be downloaded from
the 3 Bars Project Web site that can be
accessed through a link on the Battle
Mountain District’s Web page at: https://
www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/battle_
mountain_field.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chad Lewis, 3 Bars Project Manager,
telephone: 775–635–4102; address: 50
Bastian Road, Battle Mountain, NV
89820; or email: 3Bars_Project@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the
above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 3 Bars
Project area in central Eureka County,
Nevada, spans approximately 750,000
acres and includes all or portions of
three major mountain ranges (Roberts
Mountain, Simpson Park Range, and
Sulphur Spring Range). Many factors are
contributing to an overall downward
trend in land condition within this area,
including an increasing incidence and
severity of wildfire, increasing
expansion of downy brome (cheatgrass),
increasing expansion and densification
of pinyon pine and Utah juniper
woodlands, and increasing human
impacts.
The BLM is proposing a
comprehensive treatment program for
dramatically improving the health of the
3 Bars Project area and for reducing the
risks that are contributing to its decline.
The proposed project focuses on
restoration at the landscape level. The
proposed treatments would range from
several acres to several thousand acres,
depending on specific treatment and
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
management goals and desired
objectives for each resource area.
Possible treatment methods would
include manual, mechanical, and
biological control treatments, prescribed
fire or wildland fire for resource benefit,
and other management actions.
In order to implement the proposed 3
Bars Project, the BLM has developed the
All Available Methods Alternative,
which is the preferred alternative, with
treatments and treatment objectives that
meet previously identified resource
management goals. These goals are
consistent with the 1986 ShoshoneEureka Resource Management Plan
which currently guides land
management activities within the 3 Bars
Project area. These goals pertain to
wildlife and habitat enhancement, fire
and fuels management, control of
weeds, woodland and rangeland values,
wetland and riparian restoration, wild
horse protection, Native American
concerns, and cultural resources. The
BLM has identified site-specific
treatment projects that it would like to
implement to restore and manage the 3
Bars Project Area. Treatment projects
were identified through an iterative
process involving the BLM and other
Federal and State agencies. Treatments
would focus on four priority vegetation
management concerns:
• Riparian—treatments in riparian
habitats would focus on restoring
functionality in areas where structural
integrity (incised channel, headcuts,
knickpoints, developments, and
diversions) and/or appropriate species
composition are compromised.
• Aspen—treatments in quaking
aspen management habitats would focus
on improving the health of aspen stands
by stimulating aspen stand suckering
and sucker survival.
• Pinyon-juniper—treatments in
singleleaf pinyon pine and Utah juniper
habitats would focus on thinning
historic pinyon-juniper communities to
promote woodland health and removing
pinyon-juniper where it encroaches into
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
riparian areas and upland habitats,
including sagebrush habitat.
• Sagebrush—treatments in sagebrush
habitats would focus on restoring the
sagebrush community by removing
encroaching pinyon-juniper, promoting
the reestablishment of native forbs and
grasses in sagebrush communities, and
promoting the development of
sagebrush in areas where it occurred
historically.
The proposed 3 Bars Project has been
identified by the BLM as a major
Federal action and is appropriately
analyzed by an EIS. The 3 Bars Project
Draft EIS identifies and evaluates
treatment alternatives to implement the
proposed project to meet resource
management goals. In addition to the
All Available Methods Alternative,
three other alternatives are analyzed in
the Draft EIS. The No Fire Use
Alternative would target the same
treatment areas, but the methods of
treatment would not include prescribed
fire or wildland fire for resource benefit.
The Minimal Land Disturbance
Alternative also targets the same areas
for treatment, but further limits the
methods of treatment to exclude fire
use, mechanical treatments, and nonclassical biological controls. The BLM
anticipates that more acres would be
treated under the preferred alternative
due to the lower cost of some of the
treatment methods that would not be
available under the other alternatives. A
No Action alternative has also been
included for comparison purposes with
existing management conditions. Three
additional alternatives were considered
but eliminated from detailed analysis.
The BLM has prepared the Draft EIS
in conjunction with its three
cooperating agencies: The Nevada
Department of Wildlife, Eureka County
Board of Commissioners, and the
National Park Service—National Trails
Intermountain Region.
On January 25, 2010, the BLM
published a Notice of Intent (75 FR
3916) to initiate scoping for the
preparation of the EIS. The scoping
period ended March 10, 2010. Public
scoping meetings were held in Battle
Mountain, Nevada, on February 22 and
Eureka, Nevada on February 23, 2010.
The BLM received 24 scoping comment
letters on the proposed 3 Bars Project.
In addition, comments were recorded
during informal discussions with the
public at the public scoping meetings.
Based on written and oral comments
given during the scoping period, 637
catalogued individual comments were
recorded during scoping for the 3 Bars
Project EIS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Sep 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Vegetation treatment planning and
management and vegetation treatment
methods were the primary topics of
concern to the public. Respondents
were also concerned with the impacts
that treatment actions would have on
the spread of invasive species, the
viability of wild horses and livestock,
preservation of old growth woodlands,
and protection of habitat for wildlife
and special status species. All relevant
issues identified through public scoping
have been analyzed in this EIS to the
extent practicable. The Draft EIS
describes and analyzes the proposed
project’s site-specific impacts (including
cumulative) on all affected resources.
Three action alternatives (including the
preferred alternative) were analyzed in
addition to the No-Action Alternative
and three alternatives were considered
but eliminated from further analysis.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted including names,
street addresses, and email addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10.
Christopher J. Cook,
Field Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2013–23484 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLMT923000 L16100000.DP0000]
Notice of Availability of the North
Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse Draft
Resource Management Plan
Amendment and Draft Environmental
Impact Statement
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59713
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared
a North Dakota Greater Sage-Grouse
(GRSG) Draft Resource Management
Plan (RMP) Amendment and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the North Dakota Field Office and by
this notice is announcing the opening of
the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Draft RMP
Amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days
after the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its notice
of the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS
in the Federal Register. The BLM will
announce future meetings or hearings
and any other public participation
activities at least 15 days in advance
through public notices, media releases,
and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the North Dakota GRSG Draft
RMP Amendment/Draft EIS by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/mt/
st/en/fo/north_dakota_field.html.
• Email: blm_mt_nd_sage_grouse@
blm.gov.
• Fax: 406–896–5293.
• Mail: BLM—North Dakota Greater
Sage-Grouse EIS, 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings MT 59101.
Copies of the North Dakota GRSG
Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS are
available at the North Dakota Field
Office at: 99 23rd Ave. W., Dickinson,
ND, or on the Web site at: https://
www.blm.gov/mt/st/en/fo/north_
dakota_field.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth Miller, Team Lead, telephone 406–
896–5023; see address and email above.
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–253–4093 to contact the
above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM
prepared the North Dakota GRSG Draft
RMP Amendment and Draft EIS to
address a range of alternatives focused
on specific conservation measures
across the North Dakota range of the
GRSG. This Draft RMP Amendment/
Draft EIS is one of 15 separate planning
efforts that are being undertaken as part
of the BLM’s and U.S. Forest Service’s
(USFS) National GRSG Planning
Strategy. The Draft RMP Amendment/
E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM
27SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59712-59713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23484]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB00000.LF3100000.DD0000.LFHFJF500000; 13-08807; MO
4500053474]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape Restoration Project in
Eureka County, NV
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Battle Mountain
District, Mount Lewis Field Office, has prepared a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape
Restoration Project (3 Bars Project) and by this notice is announcing
the opening of the comment period.
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the 3 Bars Project Draft EIS within 45 days
following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its
Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. The BLM will announce
future meetings or hearings and any other public involvement activities
at least 15 days in advance through media releases, Web site postings
and/or mailings.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments related to the 3 Bars Project by any
of the following methods:
Email: 3Bars_Project@blm.gov.
Fax: 775-635-4034 Attn: Chad Lewis, 3 Bars Project.
Mail: BLM, Attn: Chad Lewis, 3 Bars Project, 50 Bastian
Road, Battle Mountain, NV 89820.
Copies of the Draft EIS are available at the BLM Battle Mountain
District Office in Battle Mountain, Nevada. The document can also be
downloaded from the 3 Bars Project Web site that can be accessed
through a link on the Battle Mountain District's Web page at: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/battle_mountain_field.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chad Lewis, 3 Bars Project Manager,
telephone: 775-635-4102; address: 50 Bastian Road, Battle Mountain, NV
89820; or email: 3Bars_Project@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 3 Bars Project area in central Eureka
County, Nevada, spans approximately 750,000 acres and includes all or
portions of three major mountain ranges (Roberts Mountain, Simpson Park
Range, and Sulphur Spring Range). Many factors are contributing to an
overall downward trend in land condition within this area, including an
increasing incidence and severity of wildfire, increasing expansion of
downy brome (cheatgrass), increasing expansion and densification of
pinyon pine and Utah juniper woodlands, and increasing human impacts.
The BLM is proposing a comprehensive treatment program for
dramatically improving the health of the 3 Bars Project area and for
reducing the risks that are contributing to its decline. The proposed
project focuses on restoration at the landscape level. The proposed
treatments would range from several acres to several thousand acres,
depending on specific treatment and management goals and desired
objectives for each resource area. Possible treatment methods would
include manual, mechanical, and biological control treatments,
prescribed fire or wildland fire for resource benefit, and other
management actions.
In order to implement the proposed 3 Bars Project, the BLM has
developed the All Available Methods Alternative, which is the preferred
alternative, with treatments and treatment objectives that meet
previously identified resource management goals. These goals are
consistent with the 1986 Shoshone-Eureka Resource Management Plan which
currently guides land management activities within the 3 Bars Project
area. These goals pertain to wildlife and habitat enhancement, fire and
fuels management, control of weeds, woodland and rangeland values,
wetland and riparian restoration, wild horse protection, Native
American concerns, and cultural resources. The BLM has identified site-
specific treatment projects that it would like to implement to restore
and manage the 3 Bars Project Area. Treatment projects were identified
through an iterative process involving the BLM and other Federal and
State agencies. Treatments would focus on four priority vegetation
management concerns:
Riparian--treatments in riparian habitats would focus on
restoring functionality in areas where structural integrity (incised
channel, headcuts, knickpoints, developments, and diversions) and/or
appropriate species composition are compromised.
Aspen--treatments in quaking aspen management habitats
would focus on improving the health of aspen stands by stimulating
aspen stand suckering and sucker survival.
Pinyon-juniper--treatments in singleleaf pinyon pine and
Utah juniper habitats would focus on thinning historic pinyon-juniper
communities to promote woodland health and removing pinyon-juniper
where it encroaches into
[[Page 59713]]
riparian areas and upland habitats, including sagebrush habitat.
Sagebrush--treatments in sagebrush habitats would focus on
restoring the sagebrush community by removing encroaching pinyon-
juniper, promoting the reestablishment of native forbs and grasses in
sagebrush communities, and promoting the development of sagebrush in
areas where it occurred historically.
The proposed 3 Bars Project has been identified by the BLM as a
major Federal action and is appropriately analyzed by an EIS. The 3
Bars Project Draft EIS identifies and evaluates treatment alternatives
to implement the proposed project to meet resource management goals. In
addition to the All Available Methods Alternative, three other
alternatives are analyzed in the Draft EIS. The No Fire Use Alternative
would target the same treatment areas, but the methods of treatment
would not include prescribed fire or wildland fire for resource
benefit. The Minimal Land Disturbance Alternative also targets the same
areas for treatment, but further limits the methods of treatment to
exclude fire use, mechanical treatments, and non-classical biological
controls. The BLM anticipates that more acres would be treated under
the preferred alternative due to the lower cost of some of the
treatment methods that would not be available under the other
alternatives. A No Action alternative has also been included for
comparison purposes with existing management conditions. Three
additional alternatives were considered but eliminated from detailed
analysis.
The BLM has prepared the Draft EIS in conjunction with its three
cooperating agencies: The Nevada Department of Wildlife, Eureka County
Board of Commissioners, and the National Park Service--National Trails
Intermountain Region.
On January 25, 2010, the BLM published a Notice of Intent (75 FR
3916) to initiate scoping for the preparation of the EIS. The scoping
period ended March 10, 2010. Public scoping meetings were held in
Battle Mountain, Nevada, on February 22 and Eureka, Nevada on February
23, 2010. The BLM received 24 scoping comment letters on the proposed 3
Bars Project. In addition, comments were recorded during informal
discussions with the public at the public scoping meetings. Based on
written and oral comments given during the scoping period, 637
catalogued individual comments were recorded during scoping for the 3
Bars Project EIS.
Vegetation treatment planning and management and vegetation
treatment methods were the primary topics of concern to the public.
Respondents were also concerned with the impacts that treatment actions
would have on the spread of invasive species, the viability of wild
horses and livestock, preservation of old growth woodlands, and
protection of habitat for wildlife and special status species. All
relevant issues identified through public scoping have been analyzed in
this EIS to the extent practicable. The Draft EIS describes and
analyzes the proposed project's site-specific impacts (including
cumulative) on all affected resources. Three action alternatives
(including the preferred alternative) were analyzed in addition to the
No-Action Alternative and three alternatives were considered but
eliminated from further analysis.
Please note that public comments and information submitted
including names, street addresses, and email addresses of persons who
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at
the above address during regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10.
Christopher J. Cook,
Field Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2013-23484 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P