Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters, 59306-59308 [2013-23437]
Download as PDF
59306
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: (425) 917–6418; fax: (425) 917–
6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 18, 2013.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–23444 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0826; Directorate
Identifier 2011–SW–046–AD]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model
AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2,
and SA330J helicopters. This proposed
AD would prohibit use of the hydraulic
hoist in helicopters equipped with
certain parts and configurations until a
hoist beam lower fitting protector is
installed. This proposed AD is
prompted by a report that the hoist
cable jammed during a rescue at sea.
The proposed actions are intended to
prevent the hoist cable from jamming
and subsequent cable failure, which
could result in injury and damage to the
helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 25,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
foreign authority’s AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations Office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–
0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Grant, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
817–222–5110; email robert.grant@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2009–
0271R1, dated July 8, 2011, to correct an
unsafe condition for Eurocopter Model
AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L1, AS332L2,
and SA330J helicopters with certain
hoist beams installed. EASA advises
that during a hoisting operation, a
hydraulic hoist cable jammed against
the base of the supporting strut of a dual
hoist tray installation. According to
EASA, the load was transferred to the
back-up electrical hoist and safely
brought on board. However, the
jamming of the hydraulic hoist cable
against the strut damaged the back-up
electrical hoist power supply harness,
which is routed through the area,
resulting in a short circuit that fused
and ruptured the cable. EASA reports
that this condition, if not corrected,
could lead to further incidents of hoist
cable jamming and subsequent cable
failure, which could result in personal
injuries and damage to the helicopter.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of France and
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in its
AD. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued one Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin (EASB), Revision
3, dated July 6, 2011, with three
different numbers. EASB No. 25.02.08 is
for civil and military Model AS332series helicopters; EASB No. 25.01.29 is
for military Model AS532-series
helicopters; and EASB No. 25.39 is for
civil and military Model SA330-series
helicopters. The EASB originally
provided instructions to prevent the
main hydraulic hoist cable from
becoming jammed and damaged in the
fixed fitting of the hoist beam lower
fitting. The revisions add further
instructions and expand the effectivity
to more helicopters and helicopter
equipment configurations. The revisions
also extend some compliance deadlines,
and revise some instructions to account
for improved installation procedures.
After further investigation, the most
recent revisions remove some helicopter
models from the list of applicable
helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
installing a placard that prohibits
raising or lowering the load in case of
a cable jam. If the hoist control electrical
harness is routed at the base of the hoist
supporting strut, the proposed AD
would require disabling the hoist
pyrotechnic shear function and
installing placards that state the hoist
pyrotechnic shear function is disabled.
The proposed AD would also require
either installing a hoist beam lower
fitting protector or installing placards
that prohibit operating the hydraulic
hoist.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
Our AD would differ from the EASA
AD as follows:
The EASA AD requires certain actions
before the next flight, while we would
require the same actions before the next
hoisting operation.
The EASA AD sets calendar dates that
have passed for compliance, while we
set compliance based on hours time-inservice.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
The EASA AD misidentifies the
Eurocopter SA330J service bulletin
number and paragraph number in its
required actions for Model SA330J
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require compliance with paragraph
2.B.4 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 25.39, Revision 3,
dated July 5, 2011.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 20 helicopters of U.S.
Registry and that work hours would
average $85 an hour. Based on these
estimates, we would expect the
following costs:
• The cost for installing and removing
placards is minimal.
• Disabling the hoist pyrotechnic
shear function would require 1 workhour and no parts would be needed for
a cost of $85 per helicopter, $1,700 for
the U.S. fleet.
• Installation of the hoist beam lower
fitting protector for Model AS332
helicopters without a right hand (RH)
sliding door and without a short
footstep would require 6 work-hours for
a labor cost of $510 per helicopter. Parts
would cost $4,760 for a total cost of
$5,270 per helicopter.
• Installation of the hoist beam lower
fitting protector and short footstep with
lower side protector for Model AS332
helicopters without a RH sliding door
and with a short footstep would require
12 work-hours for a labor cost of $1020
per helicopter. Parts would cost $26,891
for a total cost of $27,401 per helicopter.
• Installation of the hoist beam
protector for Model AS332 helicopters
with a RH sliding door would require 3
work-hours for a labor cost of $255 per
helicopter. Parts would cost $20,858 for
a total cost of $21,113 per helicopter.
• Installation of the hoist beam
protector for Model SA330J helicopters
would require 3 work-hours for a labor
cost of $255 per helicopter. Parts would
cost $4,774 for a total cost of $5,029 per
helicopter.
Enabling the hoist pyrotechnic shear
function would require 1 work-hour and
no parts would be needed for a cost of
$85 per helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59307
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter): Docket No.
FAA–2013–0826; Directorate Identifier
2011–SW–046–AD.
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
59308
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(a) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to the following
helicopters, certificated in any category:
(i) Eurocopter Model AS332C, AS332L,
AS332 L1, and AS332 L2 helicopters with a
hoist beam, Part Number (P/N) 330A87–
2345–00, –01, –02, –03, –04, –05, or –06,
installed with a single or double hoist plate;
and
(ii) Eurocopter Model SA330J helicopters
with a hoist beam, P/N 330A87–2345–00,
–01, –02, –03, –04, –05, or –06, installed with
a single hoist plate.
(b) Unsafe Condition
The unsafe condition is defined as hoist
cable jamming and subsequent cable failure,
which could result in injuries or damage to
the helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
Comments are due November 25, 2013.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless
accomplished previously.
(e) Required Actions
(1) Before the next hoist operation:
(i) For all helicopters, install a placard in
full view of the hoist operator that states: ‘‘IN
CASE OF CABLE JAM AGAINST STRUT DO
NOT ATTEMPT TO RAISE OR LOWER
LOAD’’.
(ii) For helicopters with a hoist control
electrical harness routed at the base of the
hoist supporting strut:
(A) Disable the hoist pyrotechnic shear
function.
(B) Install a placard on the instrument
panel in full view of the flight crew that
states:
‘‘HOIST PYROTECHNIC SHEAR
FUNCTION DISABLED’’.
(C) Install a placard in full view of the
hoist operator that states:
‘‘HOIST PYROTECHNIC SHEAR
FUNCTION DISABLED. IN CASE OF
NECESSITY, CUT THE HOIST CABLE
WITH THE SHEARS LOCATED IN THE
CABIN.’’
(iii) For helicopters listed in Paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this AD with a tray-mounted
double hoist installed with the back-up
electrical hoist power supply harness routed
at the base of the hoist supporting strut, do
one of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting
protector in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.2.b of Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 25.02.08, Revision 3,
dated July 6, 2011 (EASB), and if a short
footstep, P/N 332P21–9000–00 or 332P21–
2052–01, is installed, also install the short
footstep with lower side protector in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.2.c.2, of the
EASB; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view
of the flight crew and one in full view of the
the hoist operator, that state:
‘‘IN–FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST
IS PROHIBITED.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:01 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2) Within 60 hours time-in-service:
(i) For helicopters listed in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this AD without a tray-mounted
double hoist installed with the back-up
electrical hoist power supply harness routed
at the base of the hoist supporting strut and
without a right hand sliding door, P/N
332A22–1165–01, installed, do one of the
following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting
protecter in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.2.b, of the EASB and if a short footstep,
P/N 332P21–9000–00 or 332P21–2052–01, is
installed, also install the short footstep with
lower side protector in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.2.c.2, of the EASB; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view
of the flight crew and one in full view of the
hoist operator, that state:
‘‘IN–FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST
IS PROHIBITED.’’
(ii) For helicopters listed in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this AD with a right hand sliding
door, P/N 332A22–1165–01, installed, do one
of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting
protector in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.5, of the EASB; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view
of the flight crew and one in full view of the
hoist operator, that state:
‘‘IN–FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST
IS PROHIBITED.’’
(iii) For Model SA330J helicopters, do one
of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting
protector in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.4, of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin No. 25.39, Revision 3, dated July 5,
2011; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view
of the flight crew and one in full view of the
hoist operator, that state:
‘‘IN–FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST
IS PROHIBITED.’’
(3) For any helicopter that has been
modified per paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(A),
(e)(2)(i)(A), (e)(2)(ii)(A), or (e)(2)(iii)(A) of this
AD, do the following before the next hoist
operation:
(i) Re-establish the hoist pyrotechnic shear
function if disabled per paragraph
(e)(1)(ii)(A).
(ii) Remove any placards if installed as
required by paragraph (e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(ii)(B),
(e)(1)(ii)(C), (e)(1)(iii)(B), (e)(2)(i)(B),
(e)(2)(ii)(B), or (e)(2)(iii)(B).
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137;
telephone 817–222–5110; email
robert.grant@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2009–0271R1, dated July 8, 2011. You
may view the EASA AD at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA–2013–0826.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 7100, Powerplant System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September
17, 2013.
Gwendolynne O’Connell,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–23437 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0447]
Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sales and
Distribution Annual Summary Report
Data Tables
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification; request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is seeking
comment on a proposal regarding the
content and format of data tables for the
Agency’s annual summary report of
sales and distribution data collected
from sponsors of antimicrobial new
animal drugs in accordance with the
new animal drug records and reporting
provisions of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) as
amended by the Animal Drug User Fee
Amendments of 2008 (ADUFA).
DATES: Submit electronic or written
comments by November 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on this proposal to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal
Bataller, Center for Veterinary Medicine
(HFV–210), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59306-59308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23437]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0826; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-046-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2,
and SA330J helicopters. This proposed AD would prohibit use of the
hydraulic hoist in helicopters equipped with certain parts and
configurations until a hoist beam lower fitting protector is installed.
This proposed AD is prompted by a report that the hoist cable jammed
during a rescue at sea. The proposed actions are intended to prevent
the hoist cable from jamming and subsequent cable failure, which could
result in injury and damage to the helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 25,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the foreign
authority's AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office
(telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775;
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone 817-222-5110; email
robert.grant@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
No. 2009-0271R1, dated July 8, 2011, to correct an unsafe condition for
Eurocopter Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L1, AS332L2, and SA330J
helicopters with certain hoist beams installed. EASA advises that
during a hoisting operation, a hydraulic hoist cable jammed against the
base of the supporting strut of a dual hoist tray installation.
According to EASA, the load was transferred to the back-up electrical
hoist and safely brought on board. However, the jamming of the
hydraulic hoist cable against the strut damaged the back-up electrical
hoist power supply harness, which is routed through the area, resulting
in a short circuit that fused and ruptured the cable. EASA reports that
this condition, if not corrected, could lead to further incidents of
hoist cable jamming and subsequent cable failure, which could result in
personal injuries and damage to the helicopter.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and
[[Page 59307]]
are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical representative,
has notified us of the unsafe condition described in its AD. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant information
and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued one Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB),
Revision 3, dated July 6, 2011, with three different numbers. EASB No.
25.02.08 is for civil and military Model AS332-series helicopters; EASB
No. 25.01.29 is for military Model AS532-series helicopters; and EASB
No. 25.39 is for civil and military Model SA330-series helicopters. The
EASB originally provided instructions to prevent the main hydraulic
hoist cable from becoming jammed and damaged in the fixed fitting of
the hoist beam lower fitting. The revisions add further instructions
and expand the effectivity to more helicopters and helicopter equipment
configurations. The revisions also extend some compliance deadlines,
and revise some instructions to account for improved installation
procedures. After further investigation, the most recent revisions
remove some helicopter models from the list of applicable helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require installing a placard that prohibits
raising or lowering the load in case of a cable jam. If the hoist
control electrical harness is routed at the base of the hoist
supporting strut, the proposed AD would require disabling the hoist
pyrotechnic shear function and installing placards that state the hoist
pyrotechnic shear function is disabled. The proposed AD would also
require either installing a hoist beam lower fitting protector or
installing placards that prohibit operating the hydraulic hoist.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
Our AD would differ from the EASA AD as follows:
The EASA AD requires certain actions before the next flight, while
we would require the same actions before the next hoisting operation.
The EASA AD sets calendar dates that have passed for compliance,
while we set compliance based on hours time-in-service.
The EASA AD misidentifies the Eurocopter SA330J service bulletin
number and paragraph number in its required actions for Model SA330J
helicopters. This proposed AD would require compliance with paragraph
2.B.4 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 25.39,
Revision 3, dated July 5, 2011.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 20 helicopters of
U.S. Registry and that work hours would average $85 an hour. Based on
these estimates, we would expect the following costs:
The cost for installing and removing placards is minimal.
Disabling the hoist pyrotechnic shear function would
require 1 work-hour and no parts would be needed for a cost of $85 per
helicopter, $1,700 for the U.S. fleet.
Installation of the hoist beam lower fitting protector for
Model AS332 helicopters without a right hand (RH) sliding door and
without a short footstep would require 6 work-hours for a labor cost of
$510 per helicopter. Parts would cost $4,760 for a total cost of $5,270
per helicopter.
Installation of the hoist beam lower fitting protector and
short footstep with lower side protector for Model AS332 helicopters
without a RH sliding door and with a short footstep would require 12
work-hours for a labor cost of $1020 per helicopter. Parts would cost
$26,891 for a total cost of $27,401 per helicopter.
Installation of the hoist beam protector for Model AS332
helicopters with a RH sliding door would require 3 work-hours for a
labor cost of $255 per helicopter. Parts would cost $20,858 for a total
cost of $21,113 per helicopter.
Installation of the hoist beam protector for Model SA330J
helicopters would require 3 work-hours for a labor cost of $255 per
helicopter. Parts would cost $4,774 for a total cost of $5,029 per
helicopter.
Enabling the hoist pyrotechnic shear function would require 1 work-
hour and no parts would be needed for a cost of $85 per helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter): Docket No. FAA-2013-0826;
Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-046-AD.
[[Page 59308]]
(a) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to the following helicopters, certificated
in any category:
(i) Eurocopter Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332 L1, and AS332 L2
helicopters with a hoist beam, Part Number (P/N) 330A87-2345-00, -
01, -02, -03, -04, -05, or -06, installed with a single or double
hoist plate; and
(ii) Eurocopter Model SA330J helicopters with a hoist beam, P/N
330A87-2345-00, -01, -02, -03, -04, -05, or -06, installed with a
single hoist plate.
(b) Unsafe Condition
The unsafe condition is defined as hoist cable jamming and
subsequent cable failure, which could result in injuries or damage
to the helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
Comments are due November 25, 2013.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless accomplished
previously.
(e) Required Actions
(1) Before the next hoist operation:
(i) For all helicopters, install a placard in full view of the
hoist operator that states: ``IN CASE OF CABLE JAM AGAINST STRUT DO
NOT ATTEMPT TO RAISE OR LOWER LOAD''.
(ii) For helicopters with a hoist control electrical harness
routed at the base of the hoist supporting strut:
(A) Disable the hoist pyrotechnic shear function.
(B) Install a placard on the instrument panel in full view of
the flight crew that states:
``HOIST PYROTECHNIC SHEAR FUNCTION DISABLED''.
(C) Install a placard in full view of the hoist operator that
states:
``HOIST PYROTECHNIC SHEAR FUNCTION DISABLED. IN CASE OF
NECESSITY, CUT THE HOIST CABLE WITH THE SHEARS LOCATED IN THE
CABIN.''
(iii) For helicopters listed in Paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this AD
with a tray-mounted double hoist installed with the back-up
electrical hoist power supply harness routed at the base of the
hoist supporting strut, do one of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting protector in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.2.b of
Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 25.02.08, Revision
3, dated July 6, 2011 (EASB), and if a short footstep, P/N 332P21-
9000-00 or 332P21-2052-01, is installed, also install the short
footstep with lower side protector in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.2.c.2, of the EASB; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view of the flight crew
and one in full view of the the hoist operator, that state:
``IN-FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST IS PROHIBITED.''
(2) Within 60 hours time-in-service:
(i) For helicopters listed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this AD
without a tray-mounted double hoist installed with the back-up
electrical hoist power supply harness routed at the base of the
hoist supporting strut and without a right hand sliding door, P/N
332A22-1165-01, installed, do one of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting protecter in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.2.b, of the EASB
and if a short footstep, P/N 332P21-9000-00 or 332P21-2052-01, is
installed, also install the short footstep with lower side protector
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
2.B.2.c.2, of the EASB; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view of the flight crew
and one in full view of the hoist operator, that state:
``IN-FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST IS PROHIBITED.''
(ii) For helicopters listed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this AD
with a right hand sliding door, P/N 332A22-1165-01, installed, do
one of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting protector in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.5, of the EASB;
or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view of the flight crew
and one in full view of the hoist operator, that state:
``IN-FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST IS PROHIBITED.''
(iii) For Model SA330J helicopters, do one of the following:
(A) Install a hoist beam lower fitting protector in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.4, of Eurocopter
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 25.39, Revision 3, dated July
5, 2011; or
(B) Install two placards, one in full view of the flight crew
and one in full view of the hoist operator, that state:
``IN-FLIGHT OPERATION OF THE HOIST IS PROHIBITED.''
(3) For any helicopter that has been modified per paragraph
(e)(1)(iii)(A), (e)(2)(i)(A), (e)(2)(ii)(A), or (e)(2)(iii)(A) of
this AD, do the following before the next hoist operation:
(i) Re-establish the hoist pyrotechnic shear function if
disabled per paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(A).
(ii) Remove any placards if installed as required by paragraph
(e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(ii)(B), (e)(1)(ii)(C), (e)(1)(iii)(B),
(e)(2)(i)(B), (e)(2)(ii)(B), or (e)(2)(iii)(B).
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone 817-222-5110;
email robert.grant@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No. 2009-0271R1, dated July 8, 2011. You may view
the EASA AD at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA-2013-0826.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 7100, Powerplant
System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September 17, 2013.
Gwendolynne O'Connell,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-23437 Filed 9-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P