Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Redesignation of the Dayton-Springfield Area to Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter, 59258-59260 [2013-23242]
Download as PDF
59258
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(vii) 30 TAC 35.807—Affirmation of
an Emergency Order—adopted August
16, 1993 and submitted August 31, 1993
(as 30 TAC 116.414); revised November
18, 1998 and submitted December 10,
1998 (as redesignated to 30 TAC
35.807); revised June 28, 2006 and
submitted July 17, 2006.
(viii) 30 TAC 35.808—Modification of
an Emergency Order—adopted August
16, 1993 and submitted August 31, 1993
(as 30 TAC 116.417); revised November
18, 1998 and submitted December 10,
1998 (as redesignated to 30 TAC
35.808); revised June 28, 2006 and
submitted July 17, 2006.
(ix) 30 TAC 35.809—Setting Aside an
Emergency Order—adopted August 16,
1993 and submitted August 31, 1993 (as
30 TAC 116.418); revised November 18,
1998 and submitted December 10, 1998
(as redesignated to 30 TAC 35.809).
(5) The following provision under 30
TAC Chapter 116, Subchapter K—
Emergency Orders: 30 TAC 116.1200—
Applicability—adopted August 16, 1993
and submitted August 31, 1993 (as 30
TAC 116.410); revised November 18,
1998 and submitted December 10, 1998;
revised January 11, 2006 and submitted
February 1, 2006 (as redesignated to 30
TAC 116.1200).
[FR Doc. 2013–23380 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0058; FR–9901–21–
Region3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Direct
Final Rule for the Update of the Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budgets for the
Lancaster 1997 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is withdrawing the direct
final rule to approve revisions to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions consist of an update to the
SIP-approved Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets (MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), and an updated point source
inventory for NOX and VOCs for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard SIP for Lancaster
County. In the direct final rule
published on August 8, 2013, the table
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Dated: August 29, 2013.
W. C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
Accordingly, the amendment to 40
CFR 52.2020(e)(1) and the additions of
40 CFR 52.2043 and 40 CFR 52.2052,
published on August 8, 2013 (78 FR
48323), are withdrawn as of September
26, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013–23384 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0596; FRL–9901–09–
Region5]
40 CFR Part 52
17:00 Sep 25, 2013
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate Mar<15>2010
with the revised MVEBs contained
numerical errors. Therefore, EPA is
withdrawing this direct final rule in its
entirety. EPA will commence a separate
rulemaking action for this SIP revision.
DATES: The direct final rule published at
78 FR 48323 on August 8, 2013, is
withdrawn as of September 26, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Asrah Khadr, (215) 814–2071, or by
email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
Jkt 229001
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Redesignation of the DaytonSpringfield Area to Attainment of the
1997 Annual Standard for Fine
Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is granting, under the
Clean Air Act (CAA), the State of Ohio’s
June 1, 2011, request to redesignate the
Dayton-Springfield (Dayton)
nonattainment area (Clark, Greene, and
Montgomery Counties) to attainment for
the 1997 annual national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS or standard)
for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). EPA
is approving the related state
implementation plan (SIP) elements
including comprehensive emissions
inventories, the maintenance plan, and
the motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs). EPA has determined that the
area has attained the standard and
proposed to approve Ohio’s request on
July 26, 2013.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 26, 2013.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0596. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Matt
Rau, Environmental Engineer, at (312)
886–6524 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Rau, Environmental Engineer, Control
Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,
(312) 886–6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background Information
II. What are the Responses to Comments?
III. What final action is epa taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background Information
On June 1, 2011, Ohio submitted a
request for EPA to redesignate the
Dayton-Springfield, Ohio nonattainment
area to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. Ohio also requested EPA
approval of the SIP revision containing
an emissions inventory and a
maintenance plan for the area.
In a supplemental submission to EPA
on April 30, 2013, Ohio submitted
ammonia (NH3) and volatile organic
compounds (VOC) emissions
inventories to supplement the emissions
inventories for PM2.5, nitrogen oxides
(NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) that
were submitted on June 1, 2011.
EPA proposed to redesignate the
Dayton area and to approve related
elements on July 26, 2013 (78 FR
45135). This action included the
proposed approval of a comprehensive
emissions inventory for PM2.5, NOX,
SO2, NH3, and VOC, a maintenance
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
plan, and MVEBs. The comment period
ran until August 26, 2013. A summary
of the comments received and EPA’s
responses are given in section II.
II. What are the Responses to
Comments?
EPA received three sets of comments
during the comment period provided on
the proposed rule. One set of comments,
both supportive and for clarification,
came from the Miami Valley Regional
Planning Commission (MVRPC) on
August 2, 2013. Two sets of supportive
comments came from the Regional Air
Pollution Control Agency on August 13,
2013, and from the Ohio Utility Group
on August 26, 2013. The clarification
comment from MVRPC with EPA’s
response is below.
Comment: MVRPC noticed the
discussion about MVEBs in the
proposed rule included the proposed
approval of the MVEBs, but the
proposed rule did not list the actual
MVEBs for the Dayton area. MVRPC
referenced the Dayton area MVEBs
provided by Ohio in its June 1, 2011,
submission.
59259
Response: While EPA listed the
emission budgets and explained that a
15 percent safety margin was added to
the emission budgets to set the MVEBs,
MVRPC is correct that EPA did not list
the Dayton area MVEBs. EPA did
propose approval of the MVEBs, so EPA
is approving the Dayton area MVEBs in
this final rule. For clarity, the Dayton
area MVEBs are provided in Table 1.
The total MVEBs are calculated by
adding 15 percent to the onroad mobile
sources emission estimates that were
provided in the proposed rule on Table
6 (78 FR 45150).
TABLE 1—MVEB FOR THE DAYTON AREA
[Tons per year]
2015
Emissions
2015 Safety
margin
2015 Mobile
budget
351.68
11,187.43
III. What final action is EPA taking?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
PM2.5 ........................................................
NOX ..........................................................
publication if the rule ‘‘grants or
recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction,’’ and section 553(d)(3)
which allows an effective date less than
30 days after publication ‘‘as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule.’’
The purpose of the 30-day waiting
period prescribed in section 553(d) is to
give affected parties a reasonable time to
adjust their behavior and prepare before
the final rule takes effect. This final
rule, however, does not create any new
regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to
prepare before the rule takes effect.
Rather, it relieves Ohio of planning
requirements for the Dayton PM2.5
nonattainment area. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) for this action to become
effective on the date of publication.
EPA has determined that the Dayton
area is attaining the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS and that the area has met the
requirements for redesignation under
section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA is
thus approving the request from Ohio
EPA to change the legal designations of
the Dayton area from nonattainment to
attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5
standard. EPA is also approving Ohio’s
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Dayton
area as a revision to the Ohio SIP, as it
meets the requirements of section 175A
of the CAA. EPA is approving the 2005
and 2008 NOX, direct PM2.5, SO2
emission inventories along with the
2007/2008 ammonia and VOC emissions
inventories as meeting the
comprehensive emissions inventory
requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the
CAA. EPA is also approving the
MOVES-based NOX and direct PM2.5
2015 and 2022 MVEBs for the Dayton
area for transportation conformity
purposes. These MVEBs will be used in
future transportation conformity
analyses for the area.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
EPA finds there is good cause for these
actions to become effective immediately
upon publication. This is because a
delayed effective date is unnecessary
due to the nature of a redesignation to
attainment, which relieves the area from
certain CAA requirements that would
otherwise apply to it. The immediate
effective date for this action is
authorized under both 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become
effective less than 30 days after
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
52.75
1,678.11
404.43
12,865.54
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a
maintenance plan under section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
create any new requirements, but rather
results in the applicability of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2022
Emissions
227.24
5,452.73
2022 Safety
margin
34.09
817.91
2022 Mobile
budget
261.33
6,270.64
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, these actions
merely do not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law and the CAA. For that reason,
these actions:
• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• are not economically significant
regulatory actions based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
59260
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because a
determinations of attainment is an
action that affects the status of a
geographical area and does not impose
any new regulatory requirements on
tribes, impact any existing sources of air
pollution on tribal lands, nor impair the
maintenance of PM2.5 national ambient
air quality standards in tribal lands.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
These actions are not ‘‘major rules’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of these actions for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. These actions may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce their requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
§ 52.1880
matter.
Control strategy: Particulate
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
*
*
*
*
(p) * * *
(7) The Dayton-Springfield, Ohio
nonattainment area (Clark, Greene, and
Montgomery Counties), as submitted on
June 1, 2011, and on April 30, 2013. The
maintenance plan establishes 2015
motor vehicle emissions budgets for the
Dayton-Springfield area of 404.43 ton
per year (tpy) PM2.5 and 12,865.54 tpy
nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 2022 motor
vehicle emissions budgets of 261.33 tpy
PM2.5 and 6,270.64 tpy NOX.
(q) * * *
(7) Ohio’s 2005 and 2008 NOX,
primary PM2.5, and SO2 and 2007/2008
ammonia and VOC emissions
inventories satisfy the emission
inventory requirements of section
172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for the
Dayton-Springfield area.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 6, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
■
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
*
3. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
4. Section 81.336 is amended by
revising the entry for DaytonSpringfield, OH in the table entitled
‘‘Ohio—PM2.5(Annual NAAQS)’’ to read
as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.1880 is amended by
adding paragraphs (p)(7) and (q)(7) to
read as follows:
■
§ 81.336
*
*
Ohio.
*
*
*
OHIO—PM2.5
[Annual NAAQS]
Designation a
Designated area
Date 1
*
*
*
*
*
Dayton-Springfield, OH: ......................................................................................................................................
Clark County.
Greene County.
Montgomery County.
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–23242 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
9/26/2013
*
a Includes
1 This
*
26SER1
Type
*
Attainment
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59258-59260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23242]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0596; FRL-9901-09-Region5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Redesignation of the Dayton-Springfield Area to Attainment of the
1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is granting, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the State of
Ohio's June 1, 2011, request to redesignate the Dayton-Springfield
(Dayton) nonattainment area (Clark, Greene, and Montgomery Counties) to
attainment for the 1997 annual national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS or standard) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). EPA
is approving the related state implementation plan (SIP) elements
including comprehensive emissions inventories, the maintenance plan,
and the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs). EPA has determined
that the area has attained the standard and proposed to approve Ohio's
request on July 26, 2013.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 26, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0596. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886-6524 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background Information
II. What are the Responses to Comments?
III. What final action is epa taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background Information
On June 1, 2011, Ohio submitted a request for EPA to redesignate
the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio nonattainment area to attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Ohio also requested EPA approval of
the SIP revision containing an emissions inventory and a maintenance
plan for the area.
In a supplemental submission to EPA on April 30, 2013, Ohio
submitted ammonia (NH3) and volatile organic compounds (VOC)
emissions inventories to supplement the emissions inventories for
PM2.5, nitrogen oxides (NOX), and sulfur dioxide
(SO2) that were submitted on June 1, 2011.
EPA proposed to redesignate the Dayton area and to approve related
elements on July 26, 2013 (78 FR 45135). This action included the
proposed approval of a comprehensive emissions inventory for
PM2.5, NOX, SO2, NH3, and
VOC, a maintenance
[[Page 59259]]
plan, and MVEBs. The comment period ran until August 26, 2013. A
summary of the comments received and EPA's responses are given in
section II.
II. What are the Responses to Comments?
EPA received three sets of comments during the comment period
provided on the proposed rule. One set of comments, both supportive and
for clarification, came from the Miami Valley Regional Planning
Commission (MVRPC) on August 2, 2013. Two sets of supportive comments
came from the Regional Air Pollution Control Agency on August 13, 2013,
and from the Ohio Utility Group on August 26, 2013. The clarification
comment from MVRPC with EPA's response is below.
Comment: MVRPC noticed the discussion about MVEBs in the proposed
rule included the proposed approval of the MVEBs, but the proposed rule
did not list the actual MVEBs for the Dayton area. MVRPC referenced the
Dayton area MVEBs provided by Ohio in its June 1, 2011, submission.
Response: While EPA listed the emission budgets and explained that
a 15 percent safety margin was added to the emission budgets to set the
MVEBs, MVRPC is correct that EPA did not list the Dayton area MVEBs.
EPA did propose approval of the MVEBs, so EPA is approving the Dayton
area MVEBs in this final rule. For clarity, the Dayton area MVEBs are
provided in Table 1. The total MVEBs are calculated by adding 15
percent to the onroad mobile sources emission estimates that were
provided in the proposed rule on Table 6 (78 FR 45150).
Table 1--MVEB for the Dayton Area
[Tons per year]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 2015 Safety 2015 Mobile 2022 2022 Safety 2022 Mobile
Emissions margin budget Emissions margin budget
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM2.5................................................... 351.68 52.75 404.43 227.24 34.09 261.33
NOX..................................................... 11,187.43 1,678.11 12,865.54 5,452.73 817.91 6,270.64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. What final action is EPA taking?
EPA has determined that the Dayton area is attaining the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS and that the area has met the
requirements for redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.
EPA is thus approving the request from Ohio EPA to change the legal
designations of the Dayton area from nonattainment to attainment for
the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard. EPA is also approving Ohio's
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Dayton area as a revision to
the Ohio SIP, as it meets the requirements of section 175A of the CAA.
EPA is approving the 2005 and 2008 NOX, direct
PM2.5, SO2 emission inventories along with the
2007/2008 ammonia and VOC emissions inventories as meeting the
comprehensive emissions inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of
the CAA. EPA is also approving the MOVES-based NOX and
direct PM2.5 2015 and 2022 MVEBs for the Dayton area for
transportation conformity purposes. These MVEBs will be used in future
transportation conformity analyses for the area.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds there is good cause
for these actions to become effective immediately upon publication.
This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the
nature of a redesignation to attainment, which relieves the area from
certain CAA requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The
immediate effective date for this action is authorized under both 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that rulemaking actions may become
effective less than 30 days after publication if the rule ``grants or
recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction,'' and section
553(d)(3) which allows an effective date less than 30 days after
publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found
and published with the rule.'' The purpose of the 30-day waiting period
prescribed in section 553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable
time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final rule takes
effect. This final rule, however, does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare
before the rule takes effect. Rather, it relieves Ohio of planning
requirements for the Dayton PM2.5 nonattainment area. For
these reasons, EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this
action to become effective on the date of publication.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E)
are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of
itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the
applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have
been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, these actions merely do not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law and the CAA. For that reason, these
actions:
Are not ``significant regulatory actions'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because
[[Page 59260]]
application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA;
and
do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because a determinations of attainment is an action that affects the
status of a geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory
requirements on tribes, impact any existing sources of air pollution on
tribal lands, nor impair the maintenance of PM2.5 national
ambient air quality standards in tribal lands.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. These actions are not ``major rules'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of these actions for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. These actions may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce their requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: September 6, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.1880 is amended by adding paragraphs (p)(7) and (q)(7) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.1880 Control strategy: Particulate matter.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(7) The Dayton-Springfield, Ohio nonattainment area (Clark, Greene,
and Montgomery Counties), as submitted on June 1, 2011, and on April
30, 2013. The maintenance plan establishes 2015 motor vehicle emissions
budgets for the Dayton-Springfield area of 404.43 ton per year (tpy)
PM2.5 and 12,865.54 tpy nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
2022 motor vehicle emissions budgets of 261.33 tpy PM2.5 and
6,270.64 tpy NOX.
(q) * * *
(7) Ohio's 2005 and 2008 NOX, primary PM2.5,
and SO2 and 2007/2008 ammonia and VOC emissions inventories
satisfy the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the
Clean Air Act for the Dayton-Springfield area.
* * * * *
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
4. Section 81.336 is amended by revising the entry for Dayton-
Springfield, OH in the table entitled ``Ohio--PM2.5(Annual
NAAQS)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 81.336 Ohio.
* * * * *
Ohio--PM2.5
[Annual NAAQS]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation \a\
Designated area ----------------------------------------
Date \1\ Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Dayton-Springfield, OH:........ 9/26/2013 Attainment
Clark County...............
Greene County..............
Montgomery County..........
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as
otherwise specified.
\1\ This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-23242 Filed 9-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P