Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating Operations, 59240-59242 [2013-23100]

Download as PDF 59240 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations The Coast Guard will enforce the Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.931 for the following events: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Navy Pier Fireworks with times and dates as follows: October 26, 2013 from 9:15 p.m. through 9:45 p.m.; November 23, 2013 from 8:45 p.m. through 9:25 p.m.; December 31, 2013 from 6:45 p.m. through 7:25 p.m.; December 31, 2013 at 11:45 p.m. through January 1, 2014 at 12:30 a.m. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES [FR Doc. 2013–23381 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:00 Sep 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket No. USCG–2013–0309] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier East, Chicago, IL Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of enforcement of regulation. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Navy Pier East Safety Zone in Chicago Harbor from 9:15 p.m. until 9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013. This action is necessary and intended to ensure safety of life on the navigable waters of the United States immediately prior to, during, and immediately after a fireworks display. Enforcement of this safety zone will establish restrictions upon, and control movement of, vessels in a specified area immediately prior to, during, and immediately after a fireworks display. During the enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter the safety zone without permission of the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan. DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.933 will be enforced from 9:15 p.m. until 9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice, call or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at 414–747–7148, email Joseph.P.Mccollum@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier East, Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.933 for a fireworks display from a barge located between the Navy Pier in Chicago, IL and the breakwall to the east of Navy Pier. This zone will be enforced from 9:15 p.m. until 9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013. All vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative to enter, move within or exit the safety zone. Vessels and persons granted permission to enter the safety zone shall obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative. This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.933 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance SUMMARY: This safety zone encompasses the waters of Lake Michigan within Chicago Harbor bounded by coordinates beginning at 41°53′26.5″ N, 087°35′26.5″ W; then south to 41°53′7.6″ N, 087°35′26.3″ W; then west to 41°53′7.6″ N, 087°36′23.2″ W; then north to 41°53′26.5″ N, 087°36′24.6″ W; then east back to the point of origin (NAD 83). All vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative to enter, move within or exit the safety zone. Vessels and persons granted permission to enter the safety zone shall obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative. This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.931 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance notification of these enforcement periods via broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, determines that the safety zone need not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, he may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to enter the safety zone. The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Dated: September 13, 2013. M.W. Sibley, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 notification of this enforcement period via broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, determines that the safety zone need not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, he may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to enter the safety zone. The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Dated: September 13, 2013. M.W. Sibley, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan. [FR Doc. 2013–23383 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0066; FRL–9901–20– Region3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating Operations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland. The revision consists of a new regulation pertaining to control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from pleasure craft coating operations. EPA is approving the revision to reduce further VOC emissions from pleasure craft coating operations in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on October 28, 2013. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0066. All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM 26SER1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28773), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maryland. The NPR proposed approval of Maryland’s Regulation .27–1 under COMAR 26.11.19—Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. On January 10, 2013, Maryland submitted the formal SIP revision (#12–08) adopting the requirements as recommended by EPA’s control technique guidelines (CTG) for Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Plastic Coating (MMPPC) operations and as recommended by trade associations representing the pleasure craft industry. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES II. Summary of SIP Revision The SIP revision adds Regulation .27– 1 under COMAR 26.11.19 in order to: (1) Establish applicability for pleasure craft and fiberglass boat coating operations; (2) establish exemptions; (3) add definitions and terms to reflect pleasure craft coating operations; (4) incorporate by reference the standard test method for Specular Gloss; (5) establish that the least stringent emission limitation is applicable if more than one emission limitation applies to a specific coating; (6) establish application methods; and (7) specify VOC limit requirements for pleasure craft coating operations. EPA received no adverse comments on the NPR to approve Maryland’s SIP revision. A more complete explanation of the amendments and the rationale for EPA’s proposed action is explained in the technical support document and the NPR in support of this final rulemaking and will not be restated here. III. Final Action EPA is approving Maryland’s SIP revision adopting a new regulation to control VOC emissions from pleasure craft coating operations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:00 Sep 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 59241 IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. A. General Requirements B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action approving Maryland’s amendments to regulations for the control of VOCs for MMPPC may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: August 29, 2013. W.C. Early, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM 26SER1 59242 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Subpart V—Maryland 2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding an entry for ■ § 52.1070 COMAR 26.11.19.27–1, after the existing entry for COMAR 26.11.19.27. The added text reads as follows: * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP Code of Maryland Administrative Regulations (COMAR) citation * * * 26.11.19 * 26.11.19.27–1 ........... * * * * * BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0958; FRL–9786–3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Salt Lake County and Davis County Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Governor of Utah on March 22, 2007. The SIP revision is the State of Utah’s maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Salt Lake County and Davis County, along with associated rules: R307–101–2, ‘‘Definitions;’’ R307–110–13, ‘‘Section IX, Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part D, Ozone;’’ R307–320, ‘‘Ozone Maintenance Areas and Ogden City: Employer-Based Trip Reduction Program;’’ R307–325, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: General Requirements;’’ R307–326, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions in Petroleum Refineries;’’ R307–327, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Petroleum Liquid Storage;’’ R307–328, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: 17:00 Sep 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 Additional explanation/ citation at 40 CFR 52.1100 EPA-Approval date * * * Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes * [FR Doc. 2013–23100 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am] VerDate Mar<15>2010 * * * Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Pleasure Craft Coating Operations. * * State effective date Title/subject * 10/12/12 * * * 9/26/13 [Insert page number where the document begins]. * Maintenance Areas and Utah and Weber Counties: Gasoline Transfer and Storage;’’ R307–335, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning Operations;’’ R307–340, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Surface Coating Processes;’’ R307–341, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Cutback Asphalt;’’ and R307–342, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Qualification of Contractors and Test Procedures for Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline Delivery Tanks.’’ This action is being taken under sections 107 and 110 of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). DATES: This action is effective on October 28, 2013. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA–R08–OAR– 2012–0958. All documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 8, Air Quality Planning Unit (8P–AR), 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * Regulation Added. * Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Ostendorf, Air Program, Mailcode 8P– AR, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop St., Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–7814, ostendorf.jody@epa.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background of State Submittals A. Regulatory Context B. Ambient Ozone Conditions C. Our Proposal D. Public Participation E. Alternative Methods of Control (AMOC) and EPA’s Concurrence Requirement II. Final Action A. Maintenance Plan B. Rules III. Issues Raised by Commenters and EPA’s Responses IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Definitions For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain words as follows: (i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. (ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. (iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan. (iv) The words State or Utah mean the State of Utah, unless the context indicates otherwise. I. Background of State Submittals A. Regulatory Context Under the CAA enacted in 1970, EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for certain E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM 26SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59240-59242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23100]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0066; FRL-9901-20-Region3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous 
Metal and Plastic Parts Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating 
Operations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
submitted by the State of Maryland. The revision consists of a new 
regulation pertaining to control of volatile organic compound (VOC) 
emissions from pleasure craft coating operations. EPA is approving the 
revision to reduce further VOC emissions from pleasure craft coating 
operations in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act 
(CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on October 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0066. All documents in the docket are listed in 
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic 
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential 
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are

[[Page 59241]]

available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard 
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air 
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State 
submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by 
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28773), EPA published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maryland. The NPR proposed approval 
of Maryland's Regulation .27-1 under COMAR 26.11.19--Volatile Organic 
Compounds from Specific Processes. On January 10, 2013, Maryland 
submitted the formal SIP revision (12-08) adopting the 
requirements as recommended by EPA's control technique guidelines (CTG) 
for Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Plastic Coating (MMPPC) operations 
and as recommended by trade associations representing the pleasure 
craft industry.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    The SIP revision adds Regulation .27-1 under COMAR 26.11.19 in 
order to: (1) Establish applicability for pleasure craft and fiberglass 
boat coating operations; (2) establish exemptions; (3) add definitions 
and terms to reflect pleasure craft coating operations; (4) incorporate 
by reference the standard test method for Specular Gloss; (5) establish 
that the least stringent emission limitation is applicable if more than 
one emission limitation applies to a specific coating; (6) establish 
application methods; and (7) specify VOC limit requirements for 
pleasure craft coating operations. EPA received no adverse comments on 
the NPR to approve Maryland's SIP revision. A more complete explanation 
of the amendments and the rationale for EPA's proposed action is 
explained in the technical support document and the NPR in support of 
this final rulemaking and will not be restated here.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving Maryland's SIP revision adopting a new regulation 
to control VOC emissions from pleasure craft coating operations.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action approving Maryland's amendments to regulations for 
the control of VOCs for MMPPC may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 29, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

[[Page 59242]]

Subpart V--Maryland

0
2. In Sec.  52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding an 
entry for COMAR 26.11.19.27-1, after the existing entry for COMAR 
26.11.19.27. The added text reads as follows:


Sec.  52.1070  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                 EPA-Approved Regulations, Technical Memoranda, and Statutes in the Maryland SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Code of Maryland                                                                 Additional explanation/
  Administrative Regulations      Title/subject         State       EPA-Approval date      citation at 40 CFR
       (COMAR) citation                            effective date                               52.1100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
26.11.19.27-1................  Control of                10/12/12  9/26/13 [Insert     Regulation Added.
                                Volatile Organic                    page number where
                                Compounds from                      the document
                                Pleasure Craft                      begins].
                                Coating
                                Operations.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-23100 Filed 9-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P