Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating Operations, 59240-59242 [2013-23100]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
59240
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast
Guard will enforce the Safety Zone;
Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast,
Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.931 for
the following events:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Navy Pier Fireworks with times and
dates as follows:
October 26, 2013 from 9:15 p.m.
through 9:45 p.m.;
November 23, 2013 from 8:45 p.m.
through 9:25 p.m.;
December 31, 2013 from 6:45 p.m.
through 7:25 p.m.;
December 31, 2013 at 11:45 p.m.
through January 1, 2014 at 12:30
a.m.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2013–23381 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0309]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy
Pier East, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Navy Pier East Safety Zone in
Chicago Harbor from 9:15 p.m. until
9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013. This
action is necessary and intended to
ensure safety of life on the navigable
waters of the United States immediately
prior to, during, and immediately after
a fireworks display. Enforcement of this
safety zone will establish restrictions
upon, and control movement of, vessels
in a specified area immediately prior to,
during, and immediately after a
fireworks display. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel
may enter the safety zone without
permission of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.933 will be enforced from 9:15 p.m.
until 9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email MST1 Joseph McCollum,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at
414–747–7148, email
Joseph.P.Mccollum@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Safety Zone;
Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier East,
Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.933 for
a fireworks display from a barge located
between the Navy Pier in Chicago, IL
and the breakwall to the east of Navy
Pier. This zone will be enforced from
9:15 p.m. until 9:55 p.m. on September
26, 2013.
All vessels must obtain permission
from the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, or his on-scene representative
to enter, move within or exit the safety
zone. Vessels and persons granted
permission to enter the safety zone shall
obey all lawful orders or directions of
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
or his on-scene representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.933 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with advance
SUMMARY:
This safety zone encompasses the
waters of Lake Michigan within Chicago
Harbor bounded by coordinates
beginning at 41°53′26.5″ N, 087°35′26.5″
W; then south to 41°53′7.6″ N,
087°35′26.3″ W; then west to 41°53′7.6″
N, 087°36′23.2″ W; then north to
41°53′26.5″ N, 087°36′24.6″ W; then east
back to the point of origin (NAD 83). All
vessels must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative to enter,
move within or exit the safety zone.
Vessels and persons granted permission
to enter the safety zone shall obey all
lawful orders or directions of the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.931 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with advance
notification of these enforcement
periods via broadcast Notice to Mariners
or Local Notice to Mariners. If the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
determines that the safety zone need not
be enforced for the full duration stated
in this notice, he may use a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to grant general
permission to enter the safety zone. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Dated: September 13, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
notification of this enforcement period
via broadcast Notice to Mariners or
Local Notice to Mariners. If the Captain
of the Port, Lake Michigan, determines
that the safety zone need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
this notice, he may use a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to grant general
permission to enter the safety zone. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Dated: September 13, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013–23383 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0066; FRL–9901–20–
Region3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Adoption of Control
Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts
Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating
Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland. The
revision consists of a new regulation
pertaining to control of volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
pleasure craft coating operations. EPA is
approving the revision to reduce further
VOC emissions from pleasure craft
coating operations in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0066. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28773), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of Maryland’s Regulation .27–1 under
COMAR 26.11.19—Volatile Organic
Compounds from Specific Processes. On
January 10, 2013, Maryland submitted
the formal SIP revision (#12–08)
adopting the requirements as
recommended by EPA’s control
technique guidelines (CTG) for
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Plastic
Coating (MMPPC) operations and as
recommended by trade associations
representing the pleasure craft industry.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The SIP revision adds Regulation .27–
1 under COMAR 26.11.19 in order to:
(1) Establish applicability for pleasure
craft and fiberglass boat coating
operations; (2) establish exemptions; (3)
add definitions and terms to reflect
pleasure craft coating operations; (4)
incorporate by reference the standard
test method for Specular Gloss; (5)
establish that the least stringent
emission limitation is applicable if more
than one emission limitation applies to
a specific coating; (6) establish
application methods; and (7) specify
VOC limit requirements for pleasure
craft coating operations. EPA received
no adverse comments on the NPR to
approve Maryland’s SIP revision. A
more complete explanation of the
amendments and the rationale for EPA’s
proposed action is explained in the
technical support document and the
NPR in support of this final rulemaking
and will not be restated here.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maryland’s SIP
revision adopting a new regulation to
control VOC emissions from pleasure
craft coating operations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
59241
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
A. General Requirements
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving Maryland’s amendments to
regulations for the control of VOCs for
MMPPC may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: August 29, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
59242
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding an entry for
■
§ 52.1070
COMAR 26.11.19.27–1, after the
existing entry for COMAR 26.11.19.27.
The added text reads as follows:
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland Administrative Regulations (COMAR) citation
*
*
*
26.11.19
*
26.11.19.27–1 ...........
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0958; FRL–9786–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;
Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Standard for Salt Lake County
and Davis County
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is partially approving
and partially disapproving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the Governor of Utah on
March 22, 2007. The SIP revision is the
State of Utah’s maintenance plan for the
1997 8-hour ozone standard for Salt
Lake County and Davis County, along
with associated rules: R307–101–2,
‘‘Definitions;’’ R307–110–13, ‘‘Section
IX, Control Measures for Area and Point
Sources, Part D, Ozone;’’ R307–320,
‘‘Ozone Maintenance Areas and Ogden
City: Employer-Based Trip Reduction
Program;’’ R307–325, ‘‘Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:
General Requirements;’’ R307–326,
‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and
Maintenance Areas: Control of
Hydrocarbon Emissions in Petroleum
Refineries;’’ R307–327, ‘‘Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:
Petroleum Liquid Storage;’’ R307–328,
‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
17:00 Sep 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Additional
explanation/
citation at
40 CFR 52.1100
EPA-Approval date
*
*
*
Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes
*
[FR Doc. 2013–23100 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
*
Control of Volatile Organic Compounds
from Pleasure Craft Coating Operations.
*
*
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
10/12/12
*
*
*
9/26/13 [Insert page number where the
document begins].
*
Maintenance Areas and Utah and Weber
Counties: Gasoline Transfer and
Storage;’’ R307–335, ‘‘Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:
Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning
Operations;’’ R307–340, ‘‘Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:
Surface Coating Processes;’’ R307–341,
‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and
Maintenance Areas: Cutback Asphalt;’’
and R307–342, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment
and Maintenance Areas: Qualification of
Contractors and Test Procedures for
Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline
Delivery Tanks.’’ This action is being
taken under sections 107 and 110 of the
Clean Air Act (Act or CAA).
DATES: This action is effective on
October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R08–OAR–
2012–0958. All documents in the docket
are listed at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at EPA Region 8, Air Quality
Planning Unit (8P–AR), 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Regulation Added.
*
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody
Ostendorf, Air Program, Mailcode 8P–
AR, Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop St.,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
312–7814, ostendorf.jody@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background of State Submittals
A. Regulatory Context
B. Ambient Ozone Conditions
C. Our Proposal
D. Public Participation
E. Alternative Methods of Control (AMOC)
and EPA’s Concurrence Requirement
II. Final Action
A. Maintenance Plan
B. Rules
III. Issues Raised by Commenters and EPA’s
Responses
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words as
follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or
refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State
Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or Utah mean the
State of Utah, unless the context indicates
otherwise.
I. Background of State Submittals
A. Regulatory Context
Under the CAA enacted in 1970, EPA
established national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for certain
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59240-59242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23100]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0066; FRL-9901-20-Region3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous
Metal and Plastic Parts Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating
Operations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland. The revision consists of a new
regulation pertaining to control of volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from pleasure craft coating operations. EPA is approving the
revision to reduce further VOC emissions from pleasure craft coating
operations in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0066. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
[[Page 59241]]
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment,
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28773), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of Maryland's Regulation .27-1 under COMAR 26.11.19--Volatile Organic
Compounds from Specific Processes. On January 10, 2013, Maryland
submitted the formal SIP revision (12-08) adopting the
requirements as recommended by EPA's control technique guidelines (CTG)
for Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Plastic Coating (MMPPC) operations
and as recommended by trade associations representing the pleasure
craft industry.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The SIP revision adds Regulation .27-1 under COMAR 26.11.19 in
order to: (1) Establish applicability for pleasure craft and fiberglass
boat coating operations; (2) establish exemptions; (3) add definitions
and terms to reflect pleasure craft coating operations; (4) incorporate
by reference the standard test method for Specular Gloss; (5) establish
that the least stringent emission limitation is applicable if more than
one emission limitation applies to a specific coating; (6) establish
application methods; and (7) specify VOC limit requirements for
pleasure craft coating operations. EPA received no adverse comments on
the NPR to approve Maryland's SIP revision. A more complete explanation
of the amendments and the rationale for EPA's proposed action is
explained in the technical support document and the NPR in support of
this final rulemaking and will not be restated here.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maryland's SIP revision adopting a new regulation
to control VOC emissions from pleasure craft coating operations.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving Maryland's amendments to regulations for
the control of VOCs for MMPPC may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 29, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 59242]]
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding an
entry for COMAR 26.11.19.27-1, after the existing entry for COMAR
26.11.19.27. The added text reads as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Regulations, Technical Memoranda, and Statutes in the Maryland SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code of Maryland Additional explanation/
Administrative Regulations Title/subject State EPA-Approval date citation at 40 CFR
(COMAR) citation effective date 52.1100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
26.11.19.27-1................ Control of 10/12/12 9/26/13 [Insert Regulation Added.
Volatile Organic page number where
Compounds from the document
Pleasure Craft begins].
Coating
Operations.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-23100 Filed 9-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
