Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, and The Yankee Atomic Electric Company, 58571-58573 [2013-23243]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Notices
requested exemption would allow spent
fuel storage to continue without
imposing burdensome and costly new
requirements that provide no increased
safety benefit.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC has determined that no
credible events at the BRP ISFSI would
result in doses to the public beyond the
owner controlled area boundary that
would exceed the EPA PAGs.
Additionally, the staff has concluded
that the BRP Emergency Plan with the
exemptions described in its safety
evaluation (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13254A002), provides for an
acceptable level of emergency
preparedness at the BRP facility in its
shutdown and defueled condition, and
also provides reasonable assurance that
adequate protective measures can and
will be taken in the event of a
radiological emergency at the BRP
facility. Based on these findings, the
NRC concludes that there are no
radiological environmental impacts due
to granting the approval of the
exemption. The proposed action will
not increase the probability or
consequences of accidents. No changes
are being made in the types or quantities
of effluents that may be released offsite,
and there is no significant increase in
occupational or public radiation
exposure. Therefore, there are no
significant radiological environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action. The proposed action does not
affect non-radiological plant effluents
and has no other environmental impact.
Therefore, there are no significant nonradiological impacts associated with the
proposed action. Based on the
assessment above, the proposed action
will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative to the Proposed Action
Since there is no significant
environmental impact associated with
the proposed action, any alternatives
with equal or greater environmental
impact are not evaluated. The
alternative to the proposed action would
be to deny approval of the exemption.
This alternative would have the same
environmental impact.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The environmental assessment
associated with the exemption request
was sent to Mr. Ken Yale, Section Chief
of the Radiological Protection Section in
the Office of Waste Management and
Radiological Protection at the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) by email dated August 22, 2013
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:49 Sep 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
58571
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13238A158).
The state response was received by
email dated August 23, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13238A109). The
email states that DEQ reviewed the draft
environmental assessment and has no
comments. The NRC staff has
determined that a consultation under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
is not required because the proposed
action will not affect listed species or
critical habitat. The NRC staff has also
determined that the proposed action is
not a type of activity that has the
potential to impact historic properties
because the proposed action would
occur within the established BRP site
boundary. Therefore, no consultation is
required under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day
of September, 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michele Sampson,
Chief, Licensing Branch, Division of Spent
Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguards.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY:
The environmental impacts of the
proposed action have been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements set
forth in 10 CFR part 51. Based upon the
environmental assessment, the NRC
finds that the proposed action of
granting the exemption from specific EP
requirements in 10 CFR 50.47 and 10
CFR part 50, appendix E will not
significantly impact the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed exemption and that a finding
of no significant impact is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of
NRC’s ‘‘Rules of Practice,’’ final NRC
records and documents regarding this
proposed action are publicly available
in the records component of NRC’s
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS). The
request for exemption dated June 20,
2012 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12173A066), was docketed under 10
CFR Part 50, Docket 50–155 and under
10 CFR Part 72, Docket 72–43. These
documents may be inspected at NRC’S
Public Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. These documents may also
be viewed electronically on the public
computers located at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR), O1F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee. Persons who do not
have access to ADAMS, or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or (301)
415–4737, or by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2013–23181 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–029, 50–213, 50–309, 72–
030, 72–031, and 72–039; NRC–2013–0217]
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company,
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power
Company, and The Yankee Atomic
Electric Company
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a May 16,
2011, request from Maine Yankee
Atomic Power Company (Maine
Yankee), Connecticut Yankee Atomic
Power Company (Connecticut Yankee),
and the Yankee Atomic Electric
Company (Yankee Atomic) (together,
‘‘licensees’’ or ‘‘the Yankee
Companies’’) from the foreign
ownership, control, or domination
(FOCD) requirements.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2013–0217 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access publicly-available
information related to this action by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2013–0217. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
58572
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Notices
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Goshen, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–287–
9250; email: john.goshen@nrc.gov.
1.0 Background
Maine Yankee Atomic Power
Company (Maine Yankee), Connecticut
Yankee Atomic Power Company
(Connecticut Yankee), and the Yankee
Atomic Electric Company (Yankee
Atomic) (together, ‘‘licensees’’ or ‘‘the
Yankee Companies’’) hold part 50 of
Title10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) possession only
licenses for the following facilities:
Haddam Neck Plant (Connecticut
Yankee); Maine Yankee Atomic Power
Station (Maine Yankee); and, Yankee
Nuclear Power Station (Yankee Atomic),
(together, ‘‘the facilities’’). The facilities
ceased power operations between 1991
and 1997, and all have completed the
decommissioning process. All reactor
plant facilities have been dismantled
and removed, and only the independent
spent fuel storage installations (ISFSIs)
remain at the stations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2.0 Request/Action
On May 16, 2011, the Yankee
Companies submitted a request for
exemption from the FOCD requirements
of 10 CFR 50.38 in accordance with 10
CFR 50.12.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(1), the
Commission may grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 50
which:
Are authorized by law, will not
present an undue risk to the public
health and safety, and are consistent
with the common defense and security.
Sections [103d.and] 104d. of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
(AEA, the Act) state that:
be issued to [an alien or] any
corporation or other entity if the
Commission knows or has reason to
believe it is owned, controlled, or
dominated by an alien, a foreign
corporation or a foreign government. In
any event, no license may be issued to
any person within the United States if,
in the opinion of the Commission, the
issuance of a license to such person
would be inimical to the common
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:43 Sep 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
defense and security or to the health
and safety of the public.
Section 50.38 implements Sections 103d.
and 104d. of the AEA.
In the exemption application, the
licensees stated that Sections 103d. and
104d. of the AEA, apply only to a
license for a production or utilization
facility as defined in the AEA. The
licensees stated that regardless of their
10 CFR part 50 licenses, the possession
only conditions of the licenses do not
allow their use as a production or
utilization facility, and they are
therefore not subject to Sections 103d.
or 104d. of the AEA.
Due to the complete decommissioning
and dismantlement of the reactor
facilities, the 10 CFR part 50 licenses for
operation of the stations held by the
Yankees have been amended to allow
for only the possession of spent nuclear
fuel (SNF). Under 10 CFR 72, Subpart K,
‘‘General License for Storage of Spent
Fuel at Power Reactor Sites,’’ the
Yankee Companies are authorized to
store spent fuel. Specifically, under 10
CFR 72.210, the Yankees have a general
license to store spent fuel in an ISFSI at
each site by virtue of their Part 50
licenses to possess nuclear power
reactors.
Each Yankee company is partially
indirectly owned by foreign entities.
The remaining owner is a U.S. entity.
3 Discussion
3.1 Exemption is Authorized by Law
The NRC staff concluded that Section
103d. of the AEA does not apply to
ISFSIs. The plain language of the statute
demonstrates that it applies to
commercial licenses for production and
utilization facilities.1 The section,
which refers to ‘‘license[s] under this
section’’ and therefore, applies solely to
licenses for production or utilization
facilities, states that ‘‘[n]o license may
be issued to an alien or any corporation
or other entity if the Commission knows
or has reason to believe it is owned,
controlled, or dominated by an alien, a
foreign corporation, or a foreign
government.’’ The AEA definitions of
‘‘production facility’’ (Section 11.v) and
‘‘utilization facility’’ (Section 11.cc) do
not include ISFSIs. Therefore, Section
103d. does not preclude the NRC from
granting the Yankee Companies an
exemption from 10 CFR 50.38.
Additionally, the Commission’s
regulations at 10 CFR 50.2 defines
‘‘production facility’’ as a facility
designed or used for the formation or
processing of nuclear material, and
‘‘utilization facility’’ as ‘‘any nuclear
1 AEA
PO 00000
§§ 101, 103.
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reactor other than one designed or used
primarily for the formation of
plutonium or U–233.’’
As an ISFSI is neither ‘‘capable of the
production of special nuclear material’’
nor ‘‘capable of making use of special
nuclear material,’’ it is neither a
production facility nor a utilization
facility under the AEA. Furthermore, an
ISFSI is not designed or used for the
formation or processing of nuclear
material and is not a nuclear reactor.
Accordingly, an ISFSI is neither a
production facility nor a utilization
facility under 10 CFR part 50. As such,
the Section 103d. prohibition on FOCD
entities does not apply to an ISFSI,
regardless of whether it is licensed
under 10 CFR part 50 or 10 CFR part 72,
and therefore does not preclude the
NRC from granting the Yankee
Companies an exemption from the
FOCD requirements of 10 CFR 50.38.
3.2 The Exemption Presents no Undue
Risk to Public Health and Safety
The staff finds the requirements of 10
CFR 50.38 are intended to prevent the
FOCD of production and utilization
facilities. The Yankee facilities are
neither production nor utilization
facilities as defined in the AEA.
Additionally, since FOCD restrictions
are financial ownership restrictions and
are neither technical nor operational
requirements, granting the exemption
has no bearing on the risk to public
health and safety.
3.3 The Exemption is Consistent With
the Common Defense and Security
The Yankees are restricted by their
licenses to storing SNF in ISFSIs
approved under 10 CFR 72.214. The
underlying purpose of the 10 CFR 50.38
FOCD prohibition is to prevent foreign
ownership, control or domination of
production and utilization facilities as
defined by the AEA. The Yankee
facilities are neither production nor
utilization facilities as defined in the
AEA. In addition, there are no FOCD
restrictions placed on similarly situated
10 CFR part 72 ISFSIs with specific
licenses to store SNF. Such licensees
have similar security and common
defense concerns, and similar
considerations apply. The staff finds,
therefore, that granting the exemption is
consistent with the common defense
and security.
3.4 Special Circumstances Evaluation
The Commission cannot grant an
exemption unless special circumstances
apply per 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), and
application of the regulation would not
serve the underlying purpose of the rule
or is not necessary to achieve the
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Notices
underlying purpose of the rule per 10
CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii).
The Yankees are restricted to by their
licenses to store SNF in ISFSIs approved
by 10 CFR 72.214. The underlying
purpose of 10 CFR 50.38 is to
implement the FOCD restrictions of
Sections 103d. and 104d. of the AEA
and to prevent foreign ownership,
control or domination of production and
utilization facilities as defined by the
AEA. The Yankee Companies are not
production or utilization facilities as
defined in the AEA. The NRC staff
determined that there are no 10 CFR
50.38 FOCD restrictions placed on 10
CFR part 72 ISFSIs with specific
licenses that are similarly situated to the
Yankee facilities and similar
considerations apply. The NRC staff
finds, therefore, that applying the 10
CFR 50.38 FOCD requirement clearly
does not serve the underlying purpose
of the rule, and granting the exemption
is consistent with the special
circumstances as defined in 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii).
3.5 Environmental Evaluation
The staff has determined that this
action meets the eligibility criteria for
categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(I), ‘‘Other requirements
of an administrative, managerial, or
organizational nature.’’ Therefore,
pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no
environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with this action,
and granting the exemption, therefore,
does not present an undue risk to the
public health and safety.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 Conclusions
The staff finds granting the licensee’s
exemption request from 10 CFR 50.38
FOCD requirements acceptable for the
reasons provided in the letter from Mark
Lombard to Wayne Norton dated July
15, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13086A010).
5 Additional Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for renewal,
supporting documentation, and the
staff’s safety evaluation are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC
Public Document Room (PDR) Reference
staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737
or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:43 Sep 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of September, 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
John M. Goshen,
Project Manager, Division of Spent Fuel
Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety, and Safeguard.
[FR Doc. 2013–23243 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and
Procedures; Notice of Meeting
The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning
and Procedures will hold a meeting on
October 2, 2013, Room T–2B3, 11545
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The meeting will be open to public
attendance with the exception of a
portion that may be closed pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2) and (6) to discuss
organizational and personnel matters
that relate solely to the internal
personnel rules and practices of the
ACRS, and information the release of
which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Wednesday, October 2, 2013—12:00
p.m. until 1:00 p.m.
The Subcommittee will discuss
proposed ACRS activities and related
matters. The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Quynh Nguyen
(Telephone 301–415–5844 or Email:
Quynh.Nguyen@nrc.gov) five days prior
to the meeting, if possible, so that
arrangements can be made. Thirty-five
hard copies of each presentation or
handout should be provided to the DFO
thirty minutes before the meeting. In
addition, one electronic copy of each
presentation should be emailed to the
DFO one day before the meeting. If an
electronic copy cannot be provided
within this timeframe, presenters
should provide the DFO with a CD
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58573
containing each presentation at least
thirty minutes before the meeting.
Electronic recordings will be permitted
only during those portions of the
meeting that are open to the public.
Detailed procedures for the conduct of
and participation in ACRS meetings
were published in the Federal Register
on October 18, 2012, (77 FR 64146–
64147).
Information regarding changes to the
agenda, whether the meeting has been
canceled or rescheduled, and the time
allotted to present oral statements can
be obtained by contacting the identified
DFO. Moreover, in view of the
possibility that the schedule for ACRS
meetings may be adjusted by the
Chairman as necessary to facilitate the
conduct of the meeting, persons
planning to attend should check with
the DFO if such rescheduling would
result in a major inconvenience.
If attending this meeting, please enter
through the One White Flint North
building, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD. After registering with
security, please contact Mr. Theron
Brown (240–888–9835) to be escorted to
the meeting room.
Dated: September 17, 2013.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2013–23201 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2013–0001]
Sunshine Act Meetings Notice
Weeks of September 23, 30,
October 7, 14, 21, 28, 2013.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
DATES:
Week of September 23, 2013
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of September 23, 2013.
Week of September 30, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of September 30, 2013.
Week of October 7, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of October 7, 2013.
Week of October 14, 2013—Tentative
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
1:00 p.m. Briefing on Flooding and
Other Extreme Weather Events (Public
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58571-58573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23243]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-029, 50-213, 50-309, 72-030, 72-031, and 72-039; NRC-
2013-0217]
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Connecticut Yankee Atomic
Power Company, and The Yankee Atomic Electric Company
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a May 16, 2011, request from Maine Yankee
Atomic Power Company (Maine Yankee), Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power
Company (Connecticut Yankee), and the Yankee Atomic Electric Company
(Yankee Atomic) (together, ``licensees'' or ``the Yankee Companies'')
from the foreign ownership, control, or domination (FOCD) requirements.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0217 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may access publicly-available information related to this action by the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0217. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each
[[Page 58572]]
document referenced in this document (if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Goshen, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-287-9250; email:
john.goshen@nrc.gov.
1.0 Background
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (Maine Yankee), Connecticut
Yankee Atomic Power Company (Connecticut Yankee), and the Yankee Atomic
Electric Company (Yankee Atomic) (together, ``licensees'' or ``the
Yankee Companies'') hold part 50 of Title10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) possession only licenses for the following
facilities: Haddam Neck Plant (Connecticut Yankee); Maine Yankee Atomic
Power Station (Maine Yankee); and, Yankee Nuclear Power Station (Yankee
Atomic), (together, ``the facilities''). The facilities ceased power
operations between 1991 and 1997, and all have completed the
decommissioning process. All reactor plant facilities have been
dismantled and removed, and only the independent spent fuel storage
installations (ISFSIs) remain at the stations.
2.0 Request/Action
On May 16, 2011, the Yankee Companies submitted a request for
exemption from the FOCD requirements of 10 CFR 50.38 in accordance with
10 CFR 50.12.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(1), the Commission may grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 which:
Are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public
health and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and
security.
Sections [103d.and] 104d. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, (AEA, the Act) state that:
No license may be issued to [an alien or] any corporation or other
entity if the Commission knows or has reason to believe it is owned,
controlled, or dominated by an alien, a foreign corporation or a
foreign government. In any event, no license may be issued to any
person within the United States if, in the opinion of the Commission,
the issuance of a license to such person would be inimical to the
common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Section 50.38 implements Sections 103d. and 104d. of the AEA.
In the exemption application, the licensees stated that Sections
103d. and 104d. of the AEA, apply only to a license for a production or
utilization facility as defined in the AEA. The licensees stated that
regardless of their 10 CFR part 50 licenses, the possession only
conditions of the licenses do not allow their use as a production or
utilization facility, and they are therefore not subject to Sections
103d. or 104d. of the AEA.
Due to the complete decommissioning and dismantlement of the
reactor facilities, the 10 CFR part 50 licenses for operation of the
stations held by the Yankees have been amended to allow for only the
possession of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Under 10 CFR 72, Subpart K,
``General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites,''
the Yankee Companies are authorized to store spent fuel. Specifically,
under 10 CFR 72.210, the Yankees have a general license to store spent
fuel in an ISFSI at each site by virtue of their Part 50 licenses to
possess nuclear power reactors.
Each Yankee company is partially indirectly owned by foreign
entities. The remaining owner is a U.S. entity.
3 Discussion
3.1 Exemption is Authorized by Law
The NRC staff concluded that Section 103d. of the AEA does not
apply to ISFSIs. The plain language of the statute demonstrates that it
applies to commercial licenses for production and utilization
facilities.\1\ The section, which refers to ``license[s] under this
section'' and therefore, applies solely to licenses for production or
utilization facilities, states that ``[n]o license may be issued to an
alien or any corporation or other entity if the Commission knows or has
reason to believe it is owned, controlled, or dominated by an alien, a
foreign corporation, or a foreign government.'' The AEA definitions of
``production facility'' (Section 11.v) and ``utilization facility''
(Section 11.cc) do not include ISFSIs. Therefore, Section 103d. does
not preclude the NRC from granting the Yankee Companies an exemption
from 10 CFR 50.38.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ AEA Sec. Sec. 101, 103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Commission's regulations at 10 CFR 50.2 defines
``production facility'' as a facility designed or used for the
formation or processing of nuclear material, and ``utilization
facility'' as ``any nuclear reactor other than one designed or used
primarily for the formation of plutonium or U-233.''
As an ISFSI is neither ``capable of the production of special
nuclear material'' nor ``capable of making use of special nuclear
material,'' it is neither a production facility nor a utilization
facility under the AEA. Furthermore, an ISFSI is not designed or used
for the formation or processing of nuclear material and is not a
nuclear reactor. Accordingly, an ISFSI is neither a production facility
nor a utilization facility under 10 CFR part 50. As such, the Section
103d. prohibition on FOCD entities does not apply to an ISFSI,
regardless of whether it is licensed under 10 CFR part 50 or 10 CFR
part 72, and therefore does not preclude the NRC from granting the
Yankee Companies an exemption from the FOCD requirements of 10 CFR
50.38.
3.2 The Exemption Presents no Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR 50.38 are intended to
prevent the FOCD of production and utilization facilities. The Yankee
facilities are neither production nor utilization facilities as defined
in the AEA. Additionally, since FOCD restrictions are financial
ownership restrictions and are neither technical nor operational
requirements, granting the exemption has no bearing on the risk to
public health and safety.
3.3 The Exemption is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security
The Yankees are restricted by their licenses to storing SNF in
ISFSIs approved under 10 CFR 72.214. The underlying purpose of the 10
CFR 50.38 FOCD prohibition is to prevent foreign ownership, control or
domination of production and utilization facilities as defined by the
AEA. The Yankee facilities are neither production nor utilization
facilities as defined in the AEA. In addition, there are no FOCD
restrictions placed on similarly situated 10 CFR part 72 ISFSIs with
specific licenses to store SNF. Such licensees have similar security
and common defense concerns, and similar considerations apply. The
staff finds, therefore, that granting the exemption is consistent with
the common defense and security.
3.4 Special Circumstances Evaluation
The Commission cannot grant an exemption unless special
circumstances apply per 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), and application of the
regulation would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not
necessary to achieve the
[[Page 58573]]
underlying purpose of the rule per 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii).
The Yankees are restricted to by their licenses to store SNF in
ISFSIs approved by 10 CFR 72.214. The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.38 is to implement the FOCD restrictions of Sections 103d. and 104d.
of the AEA and to prevent foreign ownership, control or domination of
production and utilization facilities as defined by the AEA. The Yankee
Companies are not production or utilization facilities as defined in
the AEA. The NRC staff determined that there are no 10 CFR 50.38 FOCD
restrictions placed on 10 CFR part 72 ISFSIs with specific licenses
that are similarly situated to the Yankee facilities and similar
considerations apply. The NRC staff finds, therefore, that applying the
10 CFR 50.38 FOCD requirement clearly does not serve the underlying
purpose of the rule, and granting the exemption is consistent with the
special circumstances as defined in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii).
3.5 Environmental Evaluation
The staff has determined that this action meets the eligibility
criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(I), ``Other requirements of an administrative,
managerial, or organizational nature.'' Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment
need be prepared in connection with this action, and granting the
exemption, therefore, does not present an undue risk to the public
health and safety.
4 Conclusions
The staff finds granting the licensee's exemption request from 10
CFR 50.38 FOCD requirements acceptable for the reasons provided in the
letter from Mark Lombard to Wayne Norton dated July 15, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13086A010).
5 Additional Information
Documents related to this action, including the application for
renewal, supporting documentation, and the staff's safety evaluation
are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can
access the NRC's ADAMS, which provides text and image files of NRC's
public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC
Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737 or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. These documents may also be
viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR,
O1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD
20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of September, 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
John M. Goshen,
Project Manager, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety, and Safeguard.
[FR Doc. 2013-23243 Filed 9-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P