Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013; Supplemental Notice of Workshop, 58535-58536 [2013-23170]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Notices
Dated: September 18, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–23174 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. AD13–9–000]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act
of 2013; Supplemental Notice of
Workshop
As announced in the Notice issued on
September 3, 2013, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) staff will hold a workshop
on October 2, 2013, from 12:00 p.m. to
4:00 p.m. eastern daylight time (EDT).
This workshop will solicit public
comments and recommendations on the
feasibility of a two-year process for the
issuance of a license for hydropower
development at non-powered dams and
closed-loop pumped storage projects in
compliance with section 6 of the
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act
of 2013. The workshop will be held in
the Commission Meeting Room at 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
The workshop will be open to the
public and all interested parties are
invited to participate. Commission
members will attend and may
participate in the workshop. An agenda
for the workshop is attached to this
notice.
This workshop will be transcribed.
Transcripts of the workshop will be
immediately available for a fee from
Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. at (202)
347–3700. A free webcast of this event
will be available through www.ferc.gov.
Anyone with internet access who wants
to view this event can do so by
navigating to the Calendar of Events at
www.ferc.gov and locating this event in
the Calendar. The event will contain a
link to its webcast. The Capitol
Connection provides technical support
for webcasts and offers the option of
listening to the workshop via phonebridge for a fee. If you have any
questions, visit
www.CapitolConnection.org or call (703)
993–3100.
Those interested in attending the
workshop or viewing the webcast are
encouraged to register at https://
www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/
efficiency-act-10–02–13-form.asp by
September 25, 2013. A limited number
of phone lines will be available on a
first-come, first-served basis for
interested parties to participate via
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:49 Sep 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
teleconference. If you would like to
participate via teleconference, please
contact Ken Wilcox at (202) 502–6835 or
kenneth.wilcox@ferc.gov by September
25, 2013.
Commission workshops are accessible
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. For accessibility
accommodations, please send an email
to accessibility@ferc.gov, call (866) 208–
3372 (toll free) or (202) 208–8659 (TTY),
or send a FAX to (202) 208–2106 with
the required accommodations.
Those who wish to file written
comments may do so by November 1,
2013. The Commission strongly
encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments using the Commission’s
eFiling system at https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end
of your comments. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, (866)
208–3676 (toll free), or (202) 502–8659
(TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please
send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
The first page of any filing should
include docket number AD13–9–000.
All comments will be placed in the
Commission’s public files and will be
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link.
Enter AD13–9 in the docket number
field to access documents. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support.
For more information about this
workshop, please contact:
Brandon Cherry (Technical
Information), Office of Energy
Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
8328, brandon.cherry@ferc.gov
Sarah McKinley (Logistical
Information), Office of External
Affairs, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
8004, sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov
Dated: September 18, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
Two-Year Licensing Process Workshop
Purpose: To solicit comments and
recommendations on a two-year process
for licensing hydropower development
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58535
at non-powered dams and closed-loop
pumped storage projects.
Workshop Agenda
1. Introduction—12:00 p.m. to 12:30
p.m.1
1.1 Opening remarks from the
Commissioners
1.2 Introduction of FERC staff and
panel members
1.3lWorkshop procedures
2. Background (FERC staff
presentation)—12:30 p.m. to 12:45
p.m.
2.1 Section 6 of the Hydropower
Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013
2.2 Licensing process steps
2.3 Process times for recently
authorized projects
2.4 Actions implemented to shorten
process times
2.5 Common factors that lengthen
process times
3. Investigating the feasibility of a twoyear process (Input solicited from
panel and participants)—12:45 p.m.
to 3:00 p.m.
3.1 Is a two-year process feasible?
3.2 What pre-filing process steps can
be eliminated, shortened, or
combined?
3.3 What post-filing process steps
can be eliminated, shortened, or
combined?
3.4 In a two-year process, how much
time should be allotted to pre-filing
versus post-filing?
3.5 What, if any, process
modifications are needed to account
for mandatory conditions and other
agency authorizations (e.g. sections
4(e) and 18 of the FPA, 401
certifications, ESA consultation)?
What about fish and wildlife
recommendations made under
section 10(j) of the FPA?
3.6 Could memorandums of
understanding between FERC and
federal or state agencies help
expedite processing?
3.7 Are there economic factors that
affect the practicality of a two-year
process?
3.8 Does the type of project (i.e.,
non-powered dam versus closedloop pumped storage) affect the
steps included in a two-year
process?
3.9 Should there be a single
standard two-year process or should
developers be allowed to propose
unique, project-specific processes?
3.10 Is a two-year process needed for
exemptions from licensing or are
existing procedures adequate for
expedited processing of these
projects?
1 All
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
times are eastern daylight time.
24SEN1
58536
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Notices
4. Factors and criteria for identifying
pilot projects (Input solicited from
panel and participants)—3:00 p.m.
to 3:55 p.m.
4.1 What project design or siting
criteria should be met to be eligible
to use a two-year process? Would
the same criteria apply to projects at
non-powered dams and closed-loop
pumped storage projects?
4.2 What environmental criteria
should be met to be eligible to use
a two-year process? Would the same
criteria apply to projects at nonpowered dams and closed-loop
pumped storage projects?
4.3 In order for a project to qualify
for a two-year process, should there
be agreement on, and limits to, the
need to develop new information?
4.4 Are there certain types of issues
that should preclude a project from
being eligible for a two-year
process?
4.5 Are there developers that will be
ready to begin testing a two-year
process by February 5, 2014?
5. Closing comments and next steps—
3:55 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
[FR Doc. 2013–23170 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL—9901–26–OA]
Notification of a Public Meeting of the
Science Advisory Board Panel for the
Review of the EPA Water Body
Connectivity Report
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The EPA Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a
public meeting of the SAB Panel to
conduct a review of the EPA draft
report, Connectivity of Streams and
Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A
Review and Synthesis of the Scientific
Evidence (September, 2013 External
Review Draft, EPA/600/R–11/098B).
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on Monday December 16, 2013 from
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Tuesday
December 17, 2013 from 8:30 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., and Wednesday December 18,
2013 from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
(Eastern Time).
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the Washington Plaza Hotel, 10
Thomas Circle, NW., Washington, DC
20005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
member of the public who wants further
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:49 Sep 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
information concerning the public
meeting may contact Dr. Thomas
Armitage, Designated Federal Officer
(DFO), EPA Science Advisory Board
Staff Office (1400R), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460;
via telephone at (202) 564–2155 or via
email at armitage.thomas@epa.gov.
General information concerning the
SAB can be found on the EPA Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/sab.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SAB
was established pursuant to the
Environmental Research, Development,
and Demonstration Authorization Act
(ERDDAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365,
to provide independent scientific and
technical advice to the Administrator on
the technical basis for Agency positions
and regulations. The SAB is a Federal
Advisory Committee chartered under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. The SAB will
comply with the provisions of FACA
and all appropriate SAB Staff Office
procedural policies. Pursuant to FACA
and EPA policy, notice is hereby given
that the SAB Panel for the Review of the
EPA Water Body Connectivity Report
will hold a public meeting to conduct a
review of the EPA’s draft report,
Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands
to Downstream Waters: A Review and
Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence
(September, 2013 External Review Draft,
EPA/600/R–11/098B). This SAB panel
will provide advice to the Administrator
through the chartered SAB.
Background
The EPA’s Office of Research and
Development (ORD) has developed a
draft report reviewing and synthesizing
the peer-reviewed scientific literature
on the connectivity or isolation of
streams and wetlands relative to large
water bodies such as rivers, lakes,
estuaries and oceans. The purpose of the
report, Connectivity of Streams and
Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A
Review and Synthesis of the Scientific
Evidence (September, 2013 External
Review Draft, EPA/600/R–11/098B), is
to summarize the current understanding
about these connections, the factors that
influence them, and the mechanisms by
which connected waters singly or in
aggregate, affect the function of
downstream waters.
The SAB Staff Office announced to
the public through a Federal Register
notice published on March 8, 2013 (78
FR 15012—15013) that it was soliciting
nominations of scientific experts to
serve on the SAB Panel for the Review
of the EPA Water Body Connectivity
Report. Information about the formation
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of this SAB Panel can be found on the
SAB Web site at https://yosemite.epa.
gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/fedrgstr_
activites/Watershed%20Connectivity
%20Report?OpenDocument.
Technical Contact for EPA’s Draft
Report: Any technical questions
concerning EPA’s draft report should be
directed to Dr. Laurie Alexander,
National Center for Environmental
Assessment, Office of Research and
Development, U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Mail Code
8623P, Washington, DC 20460,
telephone (703) 347–8630 or via email
at alexander.laurie@epa.gov.
Availability of Meeting Materials: The
draft EPA report, Connectivity of
Streams and Wetlands to Downstream
Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the
Scientific Evidence (September, 2013
External Review Draft, EPA/600/R–11/
098B), and the charge to the SAB Panel
are available on the SAB Web site at
https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.
nsf/fedrgstr_activites/Watershed%20
Connectivity%20Report?
OpenDocument. The agenda and other
meeting materials will be available on
the SAB Web site at the URL listed
above prior to the meeting.
Procedures for Providing Public
Input: Public comment for consideration
by EPA’s federal advisory committees
and panels has a different purpose from
public comment provided to EPA
program offices. The intended use of
comments submitted to the SAB is
different from the purpose of comments
submitted to the EPA’s program offices.
Federal advisory committees and
panels, including scientific advisory
committees, provide independent
advice to EPA. Interested members of
the public may submit relevant
comments for the SAB Panel to consider
pertaining to the review materials,
including the charge to the Panel. Input
from the public to the SAB Panel will
have the most impact if it provides
specific scientific or technical
information or analysis for the SAB
Panel to consider or if it relates to the
clarity or accuracy of the technical
information. Members of the public
wishing to provide written comments
may submit them to the EPA Docket
electronically via www.regulations.gov,
by email, by mail, by facsimile, or by
hand delivery/courier. Please follow the
detailed instructions provided in the
written statements section of this notice.
Members of the public wishing to
provide oral statements to the SAB
Panel should contact the DFO directly.
Oral Statements: In general, individuals
or groups requesting an oral
presentation at a public meeting will be
limited to five minutes. Interested
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58535-58536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23170]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. AD13-9-000]
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013; Supplemental Notice
of Workshop
As announced in the Notice issued on September 3, 2013, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) staff will hold a
workshop on October 2, 2013, from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. eastern
daylight time (EDT). This workshop will solicit public comments and
recommendations on the feasibility of a two-year process for the
issuance of a license for hydropower development at non-powered dams
and closed-loop pumped storage projects in compliance with section 6 of
the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013. The workshop will be
held in the Commission Meeting Room at 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The workshop will be open to the public and all
interested parties are invited to participate. Commission members will
attend and may participate in the workshop. An agenda for the workshop
is attached to this notice.
This workshop will be transcribed. Transcripts of the workshop will
be immediately available for a fee from Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. at
(202) 347-3700. A free webcast of this event will be available through
www.ferc.gov. Anyone with internet access who wants to view this event
can do so by navigating to the Calendar of Events at www.ferc.gov and
locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to
its webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for
webcasts and offers the option of listening to the workshop via phone-
bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
www.CapitolConnection.org or call (703) 993-3100.
Those interested in attending the workshop or viewing the webcast
are encouraged to register at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/efficiency-act-10-02-13-form.asp by September 25, 2013. A
limited number of phone lines will be available on a first-come, first-
served basis for interested parties to participate via teleconference.
If you would like to participate via teleconference, please contact Ken
Wilcox at (202) 502-6835 or kenneth.wilcox@ferc.gov by September 25,
2013.
Commission workshops are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to accessibility@ferc.gov, call (866) 208-3372 (toll
free) or (202) 208-8659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 with the
required accommodations.
Those who wish to file written comments may do so by November 1,
2013. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments using the Commission's eFiling system at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to
6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system
at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number AD13-9-000.
All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and
will be available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at www.ferc.gov
using the eLibrary link. Enter AD13-9 in the docket number field to
access documents. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support.
For more information about this workshop, please contact:
Brandon Cherry (Technical Information), Office of Energy Projects,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington,
DC 20426, (202) 502-8328, brandon.cherry@ferc.gov
Sarah McKinley (Logistical Information), Office of External Affairs,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, (202) 502-8004, sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov
Dated: September 18, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
Two-Year Licensing Process Workshop
Purpose: To solicit comments and recommendations on a two-year
process for licensing hydropower development at non-powered dams and
closed-loop pumped storage projects.
Workshop Agenda
1. Introduction--12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All times are eastern daylight time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.1 Opening remarks from the Commissioners
1.2 Introduction of FERC staff and panel members
1.3--Workshop procedures
2. Background (FERC staff presentation)--12:30 p.m. to 12:45 p.m.
2.1 Section 6 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013
2.2 Licensing process steps
2.3 Process times for recently authorized projects
2.4 Actions implemented to shorten process times
2.5 Common factors that lengthen process times
3. Investigating the feasibility of a two-year process (Input solicited
from panel and participants)--12:45 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
3.1 Is a two-year process feasible?
3.2 What pre-filing process steps can be eliminated, shortened, or
combined?
3.3 What post-filing process steps can be eliminated, shortened, or
combined?
3.4 In a two-year process, how much time should be allotted to pre-
filing versus post-filing?
3.5 What, if any, process modifications are needed to account for
mandatory conditions and other agency authorizations (e.g. sections
4(e) and 18 of the FPA, 401 certifications, ESA consultation)? What
about fish and wildlife recommendations made under section 10(j) of the
FPA?
3.6 Could memorandums of understanding between FERC and federal or
state agencies help expedite processing?
3.7 Are there economic factors that affect the practicality of a
two-year process?
3.8 Does the type of project (i.e., non-powered dam versus closed-
loop pumped storage) affect the steps included in a two-year process?
3.9 Should there be a single standard two-year process or should
developers be allowed to propose unique, project-specific processes?
3.10 Is a two-year process needed for exemptions from licensing or
are existing procedures adequate for expedited processing of these
projects?
[[Page 58536]]
4. Factors and criteria for identifying pilot projects (Input solicited
from panel and participants)--3:00 p.m. to 3:55 p.m.
4.1 What project design or siting criteria should be met to be
eligible to use a two-year process? Would the same criteria apply to
projects at non-powered dams and closed-loop pumped storage projects?
4.2 What environmental criteria should be met to be eligible to use
a two-year process? Would the same criteria apply to projects at non-
powered dams and closed-loop pumped storage projects?
4.3 In order for a project to qualify for a two-year process,
should there be agreement on, and limits to, the need to develop new
information?
4.4 Are there certain types of issues that should preclude a
project from being eligible for a two-year process?
4.5 Are there developers that will be ready to begin testing a two-
year process by February 5, 2014?
5. Closing comments and next steps--3:55 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
[FR Doc. 2013-23170 Filed 9-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P