Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 58459-58460 [2013-23062]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, telephone (212) 668–7165, email judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Quogue Bridge, across Quogue Channel, mile 1.1, at Southampton, New York, has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 15 feet at mean high water and 16 feet at mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.799(d). The owner of the bridge, Suffolk County Department of Public Works, requested a temporary deviation to facilitate rehabilitation at the bridge. The waterway has commercial and seasonal recreational vessels of various sizes. Under this temporary deviation the draw of the Quogue Bridge, mile 1.1, across Quogue Canal may keep one lift span in the closed position from October 1, 2013 through March 28, 2014. The Coast Guard contacted all known commercial waterway users regarding this deviation and no objections were received. In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the bridge must return to its regular operating schedule immediately at the Local agency Dated: September 13, 2013. Gary Kassof, Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2013–23113 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0853; FRL–9832–9] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD), Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This action was proposed in the Federal Register on April 29, 2013 and concerns volatile organic compound (VOC) from motor vehicle and mobile equipment coating operations and from graphic arts SUMMARY: 1151 339 1151 VCAPCD ........... VCAPCD ........... 74.18 74.19 I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On April 29, 2013 (78 FR 25011), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP. Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations ......... Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations ......... Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations. Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations ......... Graphic Arts ................................................................................. Amended 6/19/12 .......... Revised 6/19/08 ............. Amended 12/2/05 .......... 9/21/12 10/20/08 4/6/09 Revised 11/11/08 ........... Revised 6/14/11 ............. 3/17/09 9/27/11 III. EPA Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the 17:12 Sep 23, 2013 Table of Contents Amended/ revised We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation. VerDate Mar<15>2010 operations. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’). DATES: These rules will be effective on October 24, 2013. ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0853 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105–3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrianne Borgia, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–3576, borgia.adrianne@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. Rule title Rule # AVAQMD .......... SBCAPCD ......... SCAQMD .......... tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES end of the designated time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 58459 Jkt 229001 No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Submitted provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action: E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM 24SER1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES 58460 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:12 Sep 23, 2013 Jkt 229001 cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: June 26, 2013. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(361)(i)(A)(3), (c)(363)(i)(E), (c)(366)(i)(B)(4), (c)(404)(i)(C)(2) and (c)(423)(i)(D)(2) to read as follows: ■ Identification of plan. * * * * (c) * * * (361) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (3) Rule 339, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’ revised on June 19, 2008. * * * * * (363) * * * (i) * * * (E) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 74.18, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’ revised on November 11, 2008. * * * * * (366) * * * (i) * * * (B) * * * (4) Rule 1151, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations,’’ amended on December 2, 2005. * * * * * (404) * * * (i) * * * (C) * * * (2) Rule 74.19, ‘‘Graphic Arts,’’ revised on June 14, 2011. * * * * * (423) * * * PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0094; FRL–9833–1] Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District and Feather River Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule and technical amendment. EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of two permitting rules submitted by California as a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on February 22, 2013 and concern construction and modification of stationary sources of air pollution within each District. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA). Final approval of these rules makes the rules federally enforceable and corrects program deficiencies identified in a previous EPA rulemaking (76 FR 44809, July 27, 2011). EPA is also making a technical amendment to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to reflect this previous rulemaking, which removed an obsolete provision from the California SIP. SUMMARY: Subpart F—California * [FR Doc. 2013–23062 Filed 9–23–13; 8:45 am] AGENCY: ■ § 52.220 (i) * * * (D) * * * (2) Rule 1151, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’ amended on June 19, 2012. * * * * * This rule is effective on October 24, 2013. ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0094 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multivolume reports), and some may not be DATES: E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM 24SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58459-58460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23062]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0853; FRL-9832-9]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope 
Valley Air Quality Management District, Santa Barbara County Air 
Pollution Control District, South Coast Air Quality Management District 
and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Antelope Valley 
Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD), Santa Barbara County Air 
Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD), South Coast Air Quality 
Management District (SCAQMD) and Ventura County Air Pollution Control 
District (VCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan 
(SIP). This action was proposed in the Federal Register on April 29, 
2013 and concerns volatile organic compound (VOC) from motor vehicle 
and mobile equipment coating operations and from graphic arts 
operations. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission 
sources under the Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or ``the Act'').

DATES: These rules will be effective on October 24, 2013.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0853 for 
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are 
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy 
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at 
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-
volume reports), and some may not be available in either location 
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard 
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business 
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrianne Borgia, EPA Region IX, (415) 
972-3576, borgia.adrianne@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On April 29, 2013 (78 FR 25011), EPA proposed to approve the 
following rules into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Local agency          Rule          Rule title             Amended/ revised        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAQMD.......................            1151  Motor Vehicle and Mobile  Amended 6/19/12........         9/21/12
                                                Equipment Coating
                                                Operations.
SBCAPCD......................             339  Motor Vehicle and Mobile  Revised 6/19/08........        10/20/08
                                                Equipment Coating
                                                Operations.
SCAQMD.......................            1151  Motor Vehicle and Mobile  Amended 12/2/05........          4/6/09
                                                Equipment Non-Assembly
                                                Line Coating Operations.
VCAPCD.......................           74.18  Motor Vehicle and Mobile  Revised 11/11/08.......         3/17/09
                                                Equipment Coating
                                                Operations.
VCAPCD.......................           74.19  Graphic Arts............  Revised 6/14/11........         9/27/11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they 
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action 
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section 
110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the 
California SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:

[[Page 58460]]

     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with 
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive 
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: June 26, 2013.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(361)(i)(A)(3), 
(c)(363)(i)(E), (c)(366)(i)(B)(4), (c)(404)(i)(C)(2) and 
(c)(423)(i)(D)(2) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (361) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (3) Rule 339, ``Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating 
Operations,'' revised on June 19, 2008.
* * * * *
    (363) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 74.18, ``Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating 
Operations,'' revised on November 11, 2008.
* * * * *
    (366) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (4) Rule 1151, ``Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly 
Line Coating Operations,'' amended on December 2, 2005.
* * * * *
    (404) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (2) Rule 74.19, ``Graphic Arts,'' revised on June 14, 2011.
* * * * *
    (423) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) * * *
    (2) Rule 1151, ``Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating 
Operations,'' amended on June 19, 2012.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-23062 Filed 9-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P