Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5, 58186-58188 [2013-22967]
Download as PDF
58186
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 184 / Monday, September 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
Dated: August 29, 2013.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II—North Carolina
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
2. Section 52.1770(c), under Table 1,
is amended by revising the entries for
‘‘.0902,’’ ‘‘.0909,’’ ‘‘.0952,’’ ‘‘.0953,’’ and
‘‘.0954’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1770
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
State
citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
Sect .0902 .....
*
Sect .0909 .....
5/1/2013
*
*
5/1/2013
*
9/18/2009
Sect .0953 .....
Vapor Return Piping for Stage II
Vapor Recovery.
9/18/2009
Sect .0954 .....
Stage II Vapor Recovery ................
9/18/2009
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–22965 Filed 9–20–13; 8:45 am]
*
*
*
This approval does not include the start-up shutdown
language as described in Section II. A. a. of EPA’s
3/13/2013 proposed rule (78 FR 15895)
*
*
*
*
*
*
9/23/2013 [Insert
citation of publication].
*
Petitions for Alternative Controls for
RACT.
*
9/23/2013 [Insert
citation of publication].
*
Sect .0952 .....
*
*
*
*
Compliance Schedules ...................
*
*
Volatile Organic Compounds
*
Applicability .....................................
*
Explanation
*
.0900
*
EPA approval date
9/23/2013 [Insert
citation of publication].
9/23/2013 [Insert
citation of publication].
9/23/2013 [Insert
citation of publication].
*
This rule has been repealed as state effective 9/18/
2009.
This rule has been repealed as state effective 9/18/
2009.
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R08–OAR–2009–0810, FRL–9901–04–
Region 8
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plan Revisions;
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 National Ambient
Air Quality Standards; Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Requirements
for PM2.5 Increments and Major and
Minor Source Baseline Dates;
Colorado
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
19:25 Sep 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
ACTION:
Sfmt 4700
*
Final rule.
EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions
from the State of Colorado to
demonstrate that the SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
promulgated for PM2.5 on July 18, 1997
and on October 17, 2006. The CAA
requires that each state, after a new or
revised NAAQS is promulgated, review
their SIPs to ensure that they meet
infrastructure requirements. The State of
Colorado provided infrastructure SIP
submissions on April 4, 2008 and June
4, 2010 for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS, respectively. In addition, EPA
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 184 / Monday, September 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
is approving portions of SIP revisions
submitted by the State of Colorado on
May 11, 2012 and May 13, 2013. The
revisions update Regulation 3 of the Air
Quality Control Commission permitting
requirements for the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) program
to incorporate the required elements of
the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation
Rule and the 2010 PM2.5 Increment
Rule.
This final rule is effective
October 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2009–0810. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials CBI mean or refer to
confidential business information.
(iii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean
or refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
(iv) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to
national ambient air quality standards.
(v) The initials PM mean or refer to
particulate matter.
(vi) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:25 Sep 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (fine
particulate matter).
(vii) The initials PSD mean or refer to
Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(viii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State
Implementation Plan.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs
are provided in section 110(a)(1) and (2)
of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists the
specific infrastructure elements that a
SIP must contain or satisfy. The
elements that are the subject of this
action are described in detail in our
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) of
May 23, 2013 (78 FR 30830).
In our NPR, we proposed to act on
submissions from the State of Colorado
to address infrastructure requirements
for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
The NPR proposed approval of the
submissions with respect to the
following infrastructure elements for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA
Sections 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with
respect to minor NSR requirements, (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J) with respect to the
requirements of sections 121 and 127 of
the Act, (K), (L), and (M). The reasons
for our approval are provided in detail
in the NPR.
For reasons explained in the NPR,
EPA also proposed to approve the
submissions for infrastructure elements
(C) and (J) with respect to PSD
requirements for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. Concurrently, EPA
proposed to approve revisions to
Regulation 3 submitted by Colorado on
May 11, 2012, and May 13, 2013, which
incorporate the requirements of the
2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule
and the 2010 PM2.5 Increment Rule;
specifically, revisions to: Regulation 3,
Part D, sections II.A.5.a and b, II.A.23.a
and b, II.A.25.a.(i), a.(ii), a.(iii), and b.(i),
II.A.38.c and g, II.A.42.a., and X.A.1., as
submitted on May 11, 2012, and
revisions to Regulation 3, Part D,
sections II.A.23.c., as submitted on May
13, 2013. EPA is taking no action at this
time on infrastructure element (D) for
the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received one comment. The
commenter generally supported the
EPA’s proposed action. However, the
commenter noted that EPA had recently
promulgated revised PM2.5 standards
(78 FR 3086, January 15, 2013) and
stated that the Colorado submissions
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58187
did not reflect these revised standards.
The commenter recommended that EPA
should approve the infrastructure SIPs
as submitted, but that Colorado should
submit a revised SIP addressing the new
PM2.5 standards.
Response: We note the commenter’s
general support for our action. However,
we disagree with the comment to the
extent that it implies that the Colorado
submissions we are acting on are
deficient in not addressing the newly
revised 2012 PM2.5 standards.
Colorado’s April 4, 2008 and June 4,
2010 submissions addressed
infrastructure requirements for the 1997
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, respectively.
We have evaluated the submissions
based on the requirements of sections
110(a)(1) and (a)(2) and the CAA with
respect to those standards. To the extent
that the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS may in the
future require any SIP revisions for
infrastructure purposes, we will then
evaluate Colorado’s infrastructure
submission for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
with respect to those requirements.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the following
infrastructure elements for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA section
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with respect to
minor NSR requirements, (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J) with respect to the requirements
of sections 121 and 127 of the Act, (K),
(L), and (M). EPA is approving
infrastructure elements (C) and (J) with
respect to PSD requirements for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is
approving revisions to Regulation 3
submitted by Colorado on May 11, 2012
and May 13, 2013, which incorporate
the requirements of the 2008 PM2.5 NSR
Implementation Rule and the 2010
PM2.5 Increment Rule; specifically,
revisions to: Regulation 3, Part D,
sections II.A.5.a and b, II.A.23.a and b,
II.A.25.a.(i), a.(ii), a.(iii), and b.(i),
II.A.38.c and g, II.A.42.a., and X.A.1., as
submitted on May 11, 2012, and
revisions to Regulation 3, Part D, section
II.A.23.c, as submitted on May 13, 2013.
EPA is taking no action at this time on
infrastructure element (D) for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
58188
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 184 / Monday, September 23, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:25 Sep 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 22,
2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: July 29, 2013.
Howard M. Cantor,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR Part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G—Colorado
2. Section 52.320 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(126) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.320
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(126) On May 11, 2012 and May 13,
2013 the State of Colorado submitted
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan that incorporate the required
elements of the 2008 PM2.5 NSR
Implementation Rule and the 2010
PM2.5 Increment Rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference
(A) 5 CCR 1001–5, Regulation Number
3, Stationary Source Permitting and Air
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Pollutant Emission Notice
Requirements, Part D, Concerning Major
Stationary Source New Source Review
and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, Section II, Definitions,
Section II.A.5, Baseline Area, II.A.5.a.
and II.A.5.b.; Section II.A.23., Major
Source Baseline Date, II.A.23.a. and
II.A.23.b.; II.A.25., Minor Source
Baseline Date, II.A.25.a., II.A.25.b.
introductory text, and II.A.25.b.(i);
II.A.38, Regulated NSR Pollutant,
II.A.38.c., II.A.38.g.; II.A.42., Significant,
II.A.42.a.; Section X, Air Quality
Limitations, X.A., Ambient Air
Increments, X.A.1., effective on 12/15/
11.
(B) 5 CCR 1001–5, Regulation Number
3, Stationary Source Permitting and Air
Pollutant Emission Notice
Requirements, Part D, Concerning Major
Stationary Source New Source Review
and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, Section II, Definitions,
II.A.23., Major Source Baseline Date,
II.A.23.c., effective on 2/15/13.
3. Section 52.353 is amended by
redesignating the existing paragraph as
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.353 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) On April 4, 2008 James B. Martin,
Executive Director, Colorado
Department of Public Health and
Environment, provided a submission to
meet the infrastructure requirements for
the State of Colorado for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. On June 4, 2010, Martha E.
Rudolph, Executive Director, Colorado
Department of Public Health and
Environment, provided a submission to
meet the infrastructure requirements for
the State of Colorado for the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS. The State’s Infrastructure SIP
is approved with respect to the 1997
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to
section (110)(a)(1) and the following
elements of section (110)(a)(2): (A), (B),
(C) with respect to PSD and minor NSR
requirements, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J) with
respect to PSD requirements and the
requirements of sections 121 and 127 of
the Act, (K), (L), and (M).
[FR Doc. 2013–22967 Filed 9–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58186-58188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22967]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2009-0810, FRL-9901-04-Region 8
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions;
Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Requirements for PM2.5 Increments and Major
and Minor Source Baseline Dates; Colorado
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions
from the State of Colorado to demonstrate that the SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for PM2.5
on July 18, 1997 and on October 17, 2006. The CAA requires that each
state, after a new or revised NAAQS is promulgated, review their SIPs
to ensure that they meet infrastructure requirements. The State of
Colorado provided infrastructure SIP submissions on April 4, 2008 and
June 4, 2010 for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS,
respectively. In addition, EPA
[[Page 58187]]
is approving portions of SIP revisions submitted by the State of
Colorado on May 11, 2012 and May 13, 2013. The revisions update
Regulation 3 of the Air Quality Control Commission permitting
requirements for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
program to incorporate the required elements of the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule and the 2010 PM2.5
Increment Rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2009-0810. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean
Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials CBI mean or refer to confidential business
information.
(iii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iv) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to national ambient air
quality standards.
(v) The initials PM mean or refer to particulate matter.
(vi) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to particulate
matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers
(fine particulate matter).
(vii) The initials PSD mean or refer to Prevention of
Significant Deterioration.
(viii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation
Plan.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs are provided in section
110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists the specific
infrastructure elements that a SIP must contain or satisfy. The
elements that are the subject of this action are described in detail in
our notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) of May 23, 2013 (78 FR 30830).
In our NPR, we proposed to act on submissions from the State of
Colorado to address infrastructure requirements for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. The NPR proposed approval of the submissions
with respect to the following infrastructure elements for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA Sections 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with
respect to minor NSR requirements, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J) with respect
to the requirements of sections 121 and 127 of the Act, (K), (L), and
(M). The reasons for our approval are provided in detail in the NPR.
For reasons explained in the NPR, EPA also proposed to approve the
submissions for infrastructure elements (C) and (J) with respect to PSD
requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
Concurrently, EPA proposed to approve revisions to Regulation 3
submitted by Colorado on May 11, 2012, and May 13, 2013, which
incorporate the requirements of the 2008 PM2.5 NSR
Implementation Rule and the 2010 PM2.5 Increment Rule;
specifically, revisions to: Regulation 3, Part D, sections II.A.5.a and
b, II.A.23.a and b, II.A.25.a.(i), a.(ii), a.(iii), and b.(i),
II.A.38.c and g, II.A.42.a., and X.A.1., as submitted on May 11, 2012,
and revisions to Regulation 3, Part D, sections II.A.23.c., as
submitted on May 13, 2013. EPA is taking no action at this time on
infrastructure element (D) for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received one comment. The commenter generally supported the
EPA's proposed action. However, the commenter noted that EPA had
recently promulgated revised PM2.5 standards (78 FR 3086,
January 15, 2013) and stated that the Colorado submissions did not
reflect these revised standards. The commenter recommended that EPA
should approve the infrastructure SIPs as submitted, but that Colorado
should submit a revised SIP addressing the new PM2.5
standards.
Response: We note the commenter's general support for our action.
However, we disagree with the comment to the extent that it implies
that the Colorado submissions we are acting on are deficient in not
addressing the newly revised 2012 PM2.5 standards.
Colorado's April 4, 2008 and June 4, 2010 submissions addressed
infrastructure requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS, respectively. We have evaluated the submissions based on the
requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (a)(2) and the CAA with respect
to those standards. To the extent that the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
may in the future require any SIP revisions for infrastructure
purposes, we will then evaluate Colorado's infrastructure submission
for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to those requirements.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the following infrastructure elements for the 1997
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C)
with respect to minor NSR requirements, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J) with
respect to the requirements of sections 121 and 127 of the Act, (K),
(L), and (M). EPA is approving infrastructure elements (C) and (J) with
respect to PSD requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS. EPA is approving revisions to Regulation 3 submitted by Colorado
on May 11, 2012 and May 13, 2013, which incorporate the requirements of
the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule and the 2010
PM2.5 Increment Rule; specifically, revisions to: Regulation
3, Part D, sections II.A.5.a and b, II.A.23.a and b, II.A.25.a.(i),
a.(ii), a.(iii), and b.(i), II.A.38.c and g, II.A.42.a., and X.A.1., as
submitted on May 11, 2012, and revisions to Regulation 3, Part D,
section II.A.23.c, as submitted on May 13, 2013. EPA is taking no
action at this time on infrastructure element (D) for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
[[Page 58188]]
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 22, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 29, 2013.
Howard M. Cantor,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR Part 52 is amended to read as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G--Colorado
0
2. Section 52.320 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(126) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(126) On May 11, 2012 and May 13, 2013 the State of Colorado
submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan that incorporate
the required elements of the 2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation
Rule and the 2010 PM2.5 Increment Rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference
(A) 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation Number 3, Stationary Source Permitting
and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements, Part D, Concerning
Major Stationary Source New Source Review and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, Section II, Definitions, Section II.A.5, Baseline Area,
II.A.5.a. and II.A.5.b.; Section II.A.23., Major Source Baseline Date,
II.A.23.a. and II.A.23.b.; II.A.25., Minor Source Baseline Date,
II.A.25.a., II.A.25.b. introductory text, and II.A.25.b.(i); II.A.38,
Regulated NSR Pollutant, II.A.38.c., II.A.38.g.; II.A.42., Significant,
II.A.42.a.; Section X, Air Quality Limitations, X.A., Ambient Air
Increments, X.A.1., effective on 12/15/11.
(B) 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation Number 3, Stationary Source Permitting
and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements, Part D, Concerning
Major Stationary Source New Source Review and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, Section II, Definitions, II.A.23., Major Source Baseline
Date, II.A.23.c., effective on 2/15/13.
0
3. Section 52.353 is amended by redesignating the existing paragraph as
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.353 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.
* * * * *
(b) On April 4, 2008 James B. Martin, Executive Director, Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment, provided a submission to
meet the infrastructure requirements for the State of Colorado for the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. On June 4, 2010, Martha E. Rudolph,
Executive Director, Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment, provided a submission to meet the infrastructure
requirements for the State of Colorado for the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS. The State's Infrastructure SIP is approved with respect to the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to section
(110)(a)(1) and the following elements of section (110)(a)(2): (A),
(B), (C) with respect to PSD and minor NSR requirements, (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J) with respect to PSD requirements and the requirements of
sections 121 and 127 of the Act, (K), (L), and (M).
[FR Doc. 2013-22967 Filed 9-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P