Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Nec Microwave Radios, 57871-57873 [2013-22878]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2013 / Notices
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households. Form I–590 provides a
uniform method for applicants to apply
for refugee status and contains the
information needed for USCIS to
adjudicate such applications.
The revised Form I–590 includes
additional questions that have been
transferred from Form G–646, Sworn
Statement of Refugee Applying for
Admission into the United States. These
questions assist USCIS in determining
whether an applicant is inadmissible to
the United States.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 100,000 responses at 3 hours
and 20 minutes (3.33 hours) per
response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 333,000 annual burden
hours.
If you need a copy of the information
collection instrument with instructions,
or additional information, please visit
the Federal eRulemaking Portal site at:
https://www.Regulations.gov. We may
also be contacted at: USCIS, Office of
Policy and Strategy, Regulatory
Coordination Division, 20
Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2140,
Telephone number 202–272–8377.
Dated: September 17, 2013.
Laura Dawkins,
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division,
Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013–22975 Filed 9–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Dated: September 13, 2013.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Nec
Microwave Radios
Attachment
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
H206977
September 13, 2013
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of NEC iPasolink 250 and 650
microwave radios. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded in the
final determination that Japan is the
country of origin of the microwave
radios for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Sep 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
The final determination was
issued on September 13, 2013. A copy
of the final determination is attached.
Any party-at-interest, as defined in 19
CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review
of this final determination on or before
October 21, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch: (202) 325–0041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on September 13,
2013, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177,
Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of NEC
iPasolink microwave radios, which may
be offered to the U.S. Government under
an undesignated government
procurement contract. This final
determination, in HQ H206977, was
issued at the request of NEC Corporation
of America, under procedures set forth
at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which
implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination CBP concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, the
microwave radios were substantially
transformed in Japan, such that Japan is
the country of origin of the microwave
radios for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
DATES:
OT:RR:CTF:VS H206977 KSG
Joseph L. De La Luz
Director, Trade Compliance
NEC Corporation of America
6535 N. State Hwy. 161
Irving, Texas 75039–2402
RE: Government Procurement; Country
of Origin of NEC iPASOLINK 250 and
650 microwave radios; substantial
transformation
Dear Mr. De La Luz:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57871
This is in response to your letter
dated February 27, 2012, and additional
submissions dated July 27, 2012, and
June 13, 2013, requesting a final
determination on behalf of NEC
Corporation of America (‘‘NEC’’),
pursuant to subpart B of part 177 of the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19 CFR Part 177).
Under these regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’) as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether
an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in
U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
The final determination concerns the
country of origin of the NEC
iPASOLINK 250 and 650 microwave
radios (‘‘microwave radios’’). We note
that as a U.S. importer, NEC is a partyat-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR
177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination. A conference
was held on this matter on August 28,
2012.
FACTS:
The iPASOLINK 250 and 650 are
hybrid digital microwave radios, used
for wireless point-to-point
communications. The hybrid nature of
the radio enables the simultaneous
transmission of both Time Division
Multiplexed and Ethernet-based data in
their native formats.
The microwave radios are comprised
of two major units, the indoor unit
(‘‘IDU’’) and the transmitter-receiver
unit chassis (‘‘TRX chassis’’). The TRX
chassis consists of a transmitter-receiver
(‘‘TRX’’) and a branching unit. The TRX
chassis comes in two forms: an indoor
TRX or an outdoor unit (‘‘ODU’’). The
function is the same regardless of the
mounting method. The ODU is normally
attached directly to or mounted behind
a parabolic antenna. The indoor TRX is
a rack mountable card file-type shelf
housed indoors in an environmentally
controlled (air conditioned) shelter or
other enclosure and it consists of a TRX,
a branching circuit unit, and a chassis
or card cage. The IDU, which is
common to either type of mounting, is
manufactured in India, and consists of
a rack mounted shelf or card cage that
can house a variety of plug-in units
determined by the specific application
of the radio. At a minimum, the IDU
consists of: a shelf with cooling fans, a
main card, a modulator/demodulator
(modem), and a power supply. The shelf
and fans provide a means of mounting
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
57872
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2013 / Notices
and connecting the cards that perform
the signal processing that occurs inside
the radio. The fans supply forced air
cooling to ensure the operation meets
the specifications over the stated
temperature range of the IDU. The
modem cards accept data from the main
card and map that data into frames that
are then applied to the modulator. The
modulator then modulates an
Intermediate Frequency (IF) based on
the sequence of bits in the blocks
presented for transmission. The main
card contains independent Ethernet and
Time Division Multiplexed switch
fabrics where source and destination
addresses of packets or circuits are
analyzed and cross-connects are made.
The main card also provides the
operation, administrative, and
maintenance functions of the radio.
Once switching/cross-connecting is
complete, the main card prepares the
individual Time Division Multiplexed
and Ethernet data streams for hand-off
to the modem card. The power supply
accepts a line voltage.
NEC iPASOLINK 250 and 650
microwave radios are comprised of
components from Japan and India. The
TRX, the branching circuit, and the
modem are manufactured in Japan. The
main card, the tributary unit, the power
supply unit, the IDU chassis and fans
are manufactured in India. The Indian
components are assembled with the
Japanese-origin modem to manufacture
the IDU in India. The software is
developed in India and Japan. The
software developed by NEC in Japan
pertains to the interface between the
main card and the modem cards.
All these components are shipped to
the U.S. Five components are shipped to
the U.S. from India to be assembled into
the IDU: the fan filter unit, the fan unit,
the power supply unit, the main card,
and the chassis. Two major subassemblies are shipped to the U.S. from
Japan: the modem and the indoor TRX
unit or the ODU with the antenna
attached.
In the U.S., the components listed
above that are imported from India (the
fan filter unit, the fan unit, the power
supply unit, and the main card) and the
modem are inserted into various slots in
the chassis. Sub-modules of the modem
are assembled. Then, the indoor TRX is
stacked on top of the chassis, the IDU
is stacked and interconnected with U.S.origin coaxial cables in the middle of
the chassis, and the ODU is placed in
the bottom of the chassis. The
microwave radios are tested, and the
software is customized to fit specific
customer applications and downloaded
in the U.S.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Sep 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
imported microwave radios for
government procurement purposes?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19
CFR 177.21et seq., which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the
purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and
final determinations for purposes of
U.S. government procurement, CBP
applies the provisions of subpart B of
Part 177 consistent with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations. See 19 CFR
177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Acquisition Regulations
restrict the U.S. Government’s purchase
of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions
subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end
product’’ as:
. . .an article that is mined,
produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce
with name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.
48 CFR 25.003.
In order to determine whether a
substantial transformation occurs when
components of various origins are
assembled into completed products,
CBP considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis.
The country of origin of the item’s
components, extent of the processing
that occurs within a country, and
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character,
and use are primary considerations in
such cases. Additionally, factors such as
the resources expended on product
design and development, the extent and
nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and the degree of
skill required during the manufacturing
process may be relevant when
determining whether a substantial
transformation has occurred. No one
factor is determinative.
In determining whether the
combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation,
the determinative issue is the extent of
operations performed and whether the
parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp.
1149 (CIT 1983), aff’d 741 F. 2d 1368
(Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations
that are minimal or simple, as opposed
to complex or meaningful, will
generally not result in a substantial
transformation. In Customs Service
Decision (‘‘C.S.D.’’) 85–25, 19 Cust.
Bull. 844 (1985), CBP held that for
purposes of the Generalizes System of
Preferences, the assembly of a large
number of fabricated components onto a
printed circuit board in a process
involving a considerable amount of time
and skill resulted in a substantial
transformation. In that case, in excess of
50 discrete fabricated components were
assembled.
In Data General v. United States, 4
CIT 182 (1982), the court determined
that for purposes of determining
eligibility under item 807.00, Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(predecessor to subheading 9802.00.80,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), the programming of a
foreign Programmable Read Only
Memory Chip (‘‘PROM’’) in the United
States substantially transformed the
PROM into a U.S. article. In
programming the imported PROM’s, the
U.S. engineers systematically caused
various distinct electronic
interconnections to be formed within
each integrated circuit. The
programming bestowed upon each
circuit its electronic function that is, its
‘‘memory’’ which could be retrieved. A
distinct physical change was effected in
the PROM by the opening or closing of
the fuses, depending on the method of
programming. This physical alteration,
not visible to the naked eye, could be
discerned by electronic testing of the
PROM. The court noted that the
programs were designed by a U.S.
project engineer with many years of
experience. While replicating the
program pattern from a ‘‘master’’ PROM
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 183 / Friday, September 20, 2013 / Notices
may be a quick one-step process, the
development of the pattern and
production of the ‘‘master’’ PROM
required much time and expertise. The
court noted that it was undisputed that
programing altered the character of a
PROM. The essence of the article, its
interconnections or stored memory, was
established by programming. The court
concluded that altering the nonfunctional circuitry comprising a PROM
through technological expertise in order
to produce a functioning read only
memory device, possessing a desired
distinctive circuit pattern, was no less a
substantial transformation than the
manual interconnection of transistors,
resistors and diodes upon a circuit
board created a similar pattern.
It is your position that the country of
origin is the U.S. because the final
assembly, programming, customization
of the software and testing results in a
finished and operational microwave
radio.
In this case, the software is developed
in Japan and India, and the TRX and the
modem are manufactured in Japan,
which are significant components that
are imported fully assembled. You state
in your submission that ‘‘in terms of
component material value content and
functionality, the critical components
that impart the essential character of the
microwave radios, are of Japanese
origin. . . .’’ The TRX carries the
microwave signal, which is the essence
of a microwave radio. For all these
reasons, we concur that the TRX imparts
the essential character to the microwave
radios. Further, other significant parts
such as the TRX chassis, the branching
unit and a cable are produced in Japan.
The assembly which occurs in the U.S.
does not involve numerous parts and is
a rather simple assembly. Given the
totality of the factors considered in this
case, we find that the country of origin
of the microwave radio for government
procurement purposes is Japan.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the
microwave radio is considered a
product of Japan for government
procurement purposes.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days after
publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Sep 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
review of this final determination before
the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and
Rulings Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2013–22878 Filed 9–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5687–N–36]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: HUD-Owned Real Estate—
Sales Contract and Addendums
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing, Office of Single
Family Asset Management, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
Comments Due Date: November
19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–3400
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ivery W. Himes, Director, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410;
email Ivery W. Himes at
Ivery.W.Himes@hud.gov or telephone
202–708–1672. This is not a toll-free
number. Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Himes.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57873
This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: HUDOwned Real Estate—Sales Contract and
Addendums.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0306.
Type of Request (i.e. new, revision or
extension of currently approved
collection): Extension of a currently
approved collection.
Form Number: HUD–9548; HUD–
9544; HUD–9548–B; HUD–9548–C;
HUD–9548–G; HUD–9548–H; HUD–
9548–Y; HUD–9548–Z; SAMS–1101,
SAMS–1103, SAMS–1108, SAMS–1110,
SAMS–1111, SAMS–1111–A, SAMS–
1117, SAMS–1120, SAMS–1204,
SAMS–1205.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use: This
collection of information consists of the
sales contracts and addenda that will be
used in binding contracts between
purchasers of acquired single-family
assets and HUD.
Respondents (i.e. affected public):
Business and other for profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
13,155.
Estimated Number of Responses:
925,179.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Average Hours per Response: 2–30
minutes.
Total Estimated Burdens: 310,393.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57871-57873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22878]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Nec
Microwave Radios
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of NEC iPasolink 250 and 650 microwave radios. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded in the final determination
that Japan is the country of origin of the microwave radios for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on September 13, 2013. A copy
of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as
defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination on or before October 21, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch: (202) 325-0041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on September 13,
2013, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of NEC iPasolink
microwave radios, which may be offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement contract. This final determination,
in HQ H206977, was issued at the request of NEC Corporation of America,
under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination CBP concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, the microwave radios were substantially
transformed in Japan, such that Japan is the country of origin of the
microwave radios for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: September 13, 2013.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment
H206977
September 13, 2013
OT:RR:CTF:VS H206977 KSG
Joseph L. De La Luz
Director, Trade Compliance
NEC Corporation of America
6535 N. State Hwy. 161
Irving, Texas 75039-2402
RE: Government Procurement; Country of Origin of NEC iPASOLINK 250 and
650 microwave radios; substantial transformation
Dear Mr. De La Luz:
This is in response to your letter dated February 27, 2012, and
additional submissions dated July 27, 2012, and June 13, 2013,
requesting a final determination on behalf of NEC Corporation of
America (``NEC''), pursuant to subpart B of part 177 of the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR Part 177).
Under these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979 (``TAA'') as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.),
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations
as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
The final determination concerns the country of origin of the NEC
iPASOLINK 250 and 650 microwave radios (``microwave radios''). We note
that as a U.S. importer, NEC is a party-at-interest within the meaning
of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final
determination. A conference was held on this matter on August 28, 2012.
FACTS:
The iPASOLINK 250 and 650 are hybrid digital microwave radios, used
for wireless point-to-point communications. The hybrid nature of the
radio enables the simultaneous transmission of both Time Division
Multiplexed and Ethernet-based data in their native formats.
The microwave radios are comprised of two major units, the indoor
unit (``IDU'') and the transmitter-receiver unit chassis (``TRX
chassis''). The TRX chassis consists of a transmitter-receiver
(``TRX'') and a branching unit. The TRX chassis comes in two forms: an
indoor TRX or an outdoor unit (``ODU''). The function is the same
regardless of the mounting method. The ODU is normally attached
directly to or mounted behind a parabolic antenna. The indoor TRX is a
rack mountable card file-type shelf housed indoors in an
environmentally controlled (air conditioned) shelter or other enclosure
and it consists of a TRX, a branching circuit unit, and a chassis or
card cage. The IDU, which is common to either type of mounting, is
manufactured in India, and consists of a rack mounted shelf or card
cage that can house a variety of plug-in units determined by the
specific application of the radio. At a minimum, the IDU consists of: a
shelf with cooling fans, a main card, a modulator/demodulator (modem),
and a power supply. The shelf and fans provide a means of mounting
[[Page 57872]]
and connecting the cards that perform the signal processing that occurs
inside the radio. The fans supply forced air cooling to ensure the
operation meets the specifications over the stated temperature range of
the IDU. The modem cards accept data from the main card and map that
data into frames that are then applied to the modulator. The modulator
then modulates an Intermediate Frequency (IF) based on the sequence of
bits in the blocks presented for transmission. The main card contains
independent Ethernet and Time Division Multiplexed switch fabrics where
source and destination addresses of packets or circuits are analyzed
and cross-connects are made. The main card also provides the operation,
administrative, and maintenance functions of the radio. Once switching/
cross-connecting is complete, the main card prepares the individual
Time Division Multiplexed and Ethernet data streams for hand-off to the
modem card. The power supply accepts a line voltage.
NEC iPASOLINK 250 and 650 microwave radios are comprised of
components from Japan and India. The TRX, the branching circuit, and
the modem are manufactured in Japan. The main card, the tributary unit,
the power supply unit, the IDU chassis and fans are manufactured in
India. The Indian components are assembled with the Japanese-origin
modem to manufacture the IDU in India. The software is developed in
India and Japan. The software developed by NEC in Japan pertains to the
interface between the main card and the modem cards.
All these components are shipped to the U.S. Five components are
shipped to the U.S. from India to be assembled into the IDU: the fan
filter unit, the fan unit, the power supply unit, the main card, and
the chassis. Two major sub-assemblies are shipped to the U.S. from
Japan: the modem and the indoor TRX unit or the ODU with the antenna
attached.
In the U.S., the components listed above that are imported from
India (the fan filter unit, the fan unit, the power supply unit, and
the main card) and the modem are inserted into various slots in the
chassis. Sub-modules of the modem are assembled. Then, the indoor TRX
is stacked on top of the chassis, the IDU is stacked and interconnected
with U.S.-origin coaxial cables in the middle of the chassis, and the
ODU is placed in the bottom of the chassis. The microwave radios are
tested, and the software is customized to fit specific customer
applications and downloaded in the U.S.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the imported microwave radios for
government procurement purposes?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR 177.21et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes
of U.S. government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B
of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulations. See 19
CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal Acquisition
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of products to
U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject
to the TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
. . .an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially transformed in the United States
into a new and different article of commerce with name, character, or
use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
48 CFR 25.003.
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs
when components of various origins are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes
such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of
the item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases.
Additionally, factors such as the resources expended on product design
and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and the degree of skill required during the
manufacturing process may be relevant when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is
determinative.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (CIT 1983), aff'd 741 F. 2d
1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are minimal or simple,
as opposed to complex or meaningful, will generally not result in a
substantial transformation. In Customs Service Decision (``C.S.D.'')
85-25, 19 Cust. Bull. 844 (1985), CBP held that for purposes of the
Generalizes System of Preferences, the assembly of a large number of
fabricated components onto a printed circuit board in a process
involving a considerable amount of time and skill resulted in a
substantial transformation. In that case, in excess of 50 discrete
fabricated components were assembled.
In Data General v. United States, 4 CIT 182 (1982), the court
determined that for purposes of determining eligibility under item
807.00, Tariff Schedule of the United States (predecessor to subheading
9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), the
programming of a foreign Programmable Read Only Memory Chip (``PROM'')
in the United States substantially transformed the PROM into a U.S.
article. In programming the imported PROM's, the U.S. engineers
systematically caused various distinct electronic interconnections to
be formed within each integrated circuit. The programming bestowed upon
each circuit its electronic function that is, its ``memory'' which
could be retrieved. A distinct physical change was effected in the PROM
by the opening or closing of the fuses, depending on the method of
programming. This physical alteration, not visible to the naked eye,
could be discerned by electronic testing of the PROM. The court noted
that the programs were designed by a U.S. project engineer with many
years of experience. While replicating the program pattern from a
``master'' PROM
[[Page 57873]]
may be a quick one-step process, the development of the pattern and
production of the ``master'' PROM required much time and expertise. The
court noted that it was undisputed that programing altered the
character of a PROM. The essence of the article, its interconnections
or stored memory, was established by programming. The court concluded
that altering the non-functional circuitry comprising a PROM through
technological expertise in order to produce a functioning read only
memory device, possessing a desired distinctive circuit pattern, was no
less a substantial transformation than the manual interconnection of
transistors, resistors and diodes upon a circuit board created a
similar pattern.
It is your position that the country of origin is the U.S. because
the final assembly, programming, customization of the software and
testing results in a finished and operational microwave radio.
In this case, the software is developed in Japan and India, and the
TRX and the modem are manufactured in Japan, which are significant
components that are imported fully assembled. You state in your
submission that ``in terms of component material value content and
functionality, the critical components that impart the essential
character of the microwave radios, are of Japanese origin. . . .'' The
TRX carries the microwave signal, which is the essence of a microwave
radio. For all these reasons, we concur that the TRX imparts the
essential character to the microwave radios. Further, other significant
parts such as the TRX chassis, the branching unit and a cable are
produced in Japan. The assembly which occurs in the U.S. does not
involve numerous parts and is a rather simple assembly. Given the
totality of the factors considered in this case, we find that the
country of origin of the microwave radio for government procurement
purposes is Japan.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the microwave radio is considered a
product of Japan for government procurement purposes.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days after publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings Office of International
Trade.
[FR Doc. 2013-22878 Filed 9-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P