Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request, 57641-57643 [2013-22774]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
57641
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs.)
Type of respondents
Form name
CDC Field Staff, state health officers, local
health department directors, preparedness
planners, non-public health preparedness
and response partners, the public and volunteer group members.
CDC Field Staff, state health officers, local
health department directors, preparedness
planners, non-public health preparedness
and response partners, the public and volunteer group members.
‘‘So What? Telling a Compelling Story’’ ........
100
1
30/60
‘‘So What? Telling a Compelling Story’’ Follow-Up Questions.
30
1
1.5
Leroy Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–22806 Filed 9–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
The President signed the Child and
Family Services Improvement and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–34) into
law on September 30, 2011. This act
includes a targeted grants program
(section 437(f) of the Social Security
Act), which directs the Secretary of
Health and Human Services (HHS) to
reserve a specified portion for Regional
Partnership Grants, designed to improve
the well-being of children affected by
parental substance abuse. On September
28, 2012, CB/ACYF awarded new 5-year
RPG grants to 17 partnerships in 15
states. The overall objective of the
Cross-Site Evaluation and Technical
Assistance project (the RPG Cross-Site
Evaluation) is to plan, develop, and
implement a rigorous national cross-site
evaluation of the RPG Grant Program,
provide legislatively-mandated
performance measurement, and furnish
evaluation-related technical assistance
to the grantees in order to improve the
quality and rigor of their local
evaluations. The project will evaluate
the programs and activities conducted
through the RPG Grant Program.
Title: RPG National Cross-Site
Evaluation and Evaluation Technical
Assistance.
OMB No.: New collection.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:27 Sep 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
Description: The Children’s Bureau
within the Administration for Children
and Families of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services seeks
approval to collect information for the
Regional Partnership Grants to Increase
the Well-being of and to Improve
Permanency Outcomes for Children
Affected by Substance Abuse (known as
the Regional Partnership Grants
Program or ‘‘RPG’’) Cross-Site
Evaluation and Evaluation-Related
Technical Assistance project. Under
RPG, the Children’s Bureau has issued
17 grants to organizations such as child
welfare or substance abuse treatment
providers or family court systems to
develop interagency collaborations and
integration of programs, activities, and
services designed to increase well-being,
improve permanency, and enhance the
safety of children who are in an out-ofhome placement or are at risk of being
placed in out-of-home care as a result of
a parent’s or caretaker’s substance
abuse. The Child and Family Services
Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub.
L. 112–34) includes a targeted grants
program (section 437(f) of the Social
Security Act) that directs the Secretary
of Health and Human Services to
reserve a specified portion of the
appropriation for these Regional
Partnership Grants, to be used to
improve the well-being of children
affected by substance abuse. The overall
objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation
and Technical Assistance project (the
RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to plan,
develop, and implement a rigorous
national cross-site evaluation of the RPG
Grant Program, provide legislativelymandated performance measurement,
and furnish evaluation-related technical
assistance to the grantees in order to
improve the quality and rigor of their
local evaluations. The project will
evaluate the programs and activities
conducted through the RPG Grant
Program. The evaluation is being
undertaken by the Children’s Bureau
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and its contractor Mathematica Policy
Research. The evaluation is being
implemented by Mathematica Policy
Research and its subcontractors, Walter
R. McDonald & Associates and Synergy
Enterprises.
The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation will
include the following components:
1. Implementation and Partnership
Study. The RPG cross-site
implementation and partnership study
will contribute to building the
knowledge base about effective
implementation strategies by examining
the process of implementation in the 17
RPG projects, with a focus on factors
shown in the research literature to be
associated with quality implementation
of evidence-based programs. This
component of the study will describe
the RPG projects’ target populations,
selected interventions and their fit with
the target populations, inputs to
implementation, and actual services
provided (including dosage, duration,
content, adherence to curricula, and
participant responsiveness). It will
examine the key attributes of the
regional partnerships that grantees
develop (for example, partnerships
among child welfare and substance
abuse treatment providers, social
services, and the courts). It will describe
the characteristics and roles of the
partner organizations, the extent of
coordination and collaboration, and
their potential to sustain the
partnerships after the grant ends. Key
data collection activities of the
implementation and partnership study
are: (1) Conducting site visits during
which researchers will interview RPG
program directors, managers,
supervisors, and frontline staff who
work directly with families; (2)
administering a survey to frontline staff
involved in providing direct services to
children, adults, and families; (3) asking
grantees to provide information about
implementation and their partnerships
as part of their federally required semi-
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
57642
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Notices
annual progress reports; (4) obtaining
service use data from grantees,
enrollment date and demographics of
enrollees, exit date and reason, and
service participation, to be entered into
a web-based system developed and
operated by Mathematica Policy
Research and its subcontractors; and (5)
administering a survey to
representatives of the partner
organizations.
2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the
outcomes study is to describe the
changes that occur in children and
families who participate in the RPG
programs. This study will describe
participant outcomes in five domains:
(1) Child well-being, (2) family
functioning/stability, (3) adult recovery
from substance use, (4) child
permanency, and (5) child safety. Two
main types of outcome data will be
used—both of which are being collected
by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative
child welfare and adult substance abuse
treatment records and (2) standardized
instruments administered to the parents
and/or caregivers. The Children’s
Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain
and report specified administrative
records, and to use a prescribed set of
standardized instruments. Grantees will
provide these data to the Cross-Site
Evaluation team twice a year by
uploading them to a data system
developed and operated by Mathematica
Policy Research and its subcontractors.
3. Impact Study. The goal of the
impact study is to assess the impact of
the RPG interventions on child, adult,
and family outcomes by comparing
outcomes for people enrolled in RPG
services to those in comparison groups,
such as people who do not receive RPG
services or receive only a subset of the
services. The impact study will use
demographic and outcome data on both
program (treatment) and comparison
groups from a subset of grantees with
appropriate local evaluation designs
such as randomized controlled trials or
strong quasi-experimental designs; 8 of
the 17 grantees have such designs. Sitespecific impacts will be estimated for
these eight grantees. Aggregated impact
estimates will be created by pooling
impact estimates across appropriate
sites to obtain a more powerful
summary of the effectiveness of RPG
interventions.
In addition to conducting local
evaluations and participating in the RPG
Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees
are legislatively required to report
performance indicators aligned with
their proposed program strategies and
activities. A key strategy of the RPG
Cross-Site Evaluation is to minimize
burden on the grantees by ensuring that
the cross-site evaluation, which
includes all grantees in a study that
collects data to report on
implementation, the partnerships, and
participant characteristics and
outcomes, fully meets the need for
performance reporting. Thus, rather
than collecting separate evaluation and
performance indicator data, the grantees
need only participate in the cross-site
evaluation. In addition, using the
standardized instruments that the
Children’s Bureau has specified will
ensure that grantees have valid and
reliable data on child and family
outcomes for their local evaluations.
The inclusion of an impact study
conducted on a subset of grantees with
rigorous designs will also provide the
Children’s Bureau, Congress, grantees,
providers, and researchers with
information about the effectiveness of
RPG programs. This 60-Day Notice
covers the following data collection
activities: (1) The site visits with
grantees; (2) the web-based survey of
frontline staff who provide direct
services to children, adults, and
families, and their supervisors; (3) the
semi-annual progress reports; (4)
enrollment and service data provided by
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of
grantee partners; and (6) outcome data
provided by grantees.
Respondents: Respondents include
grantee staff or contractors (such as local
evaluators) and partner staff. Specific
types of respondents and the expected
number per data collection effort are
noted in the burden table below.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Instrument
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Program director individual interview ..................................................
Program manager/supervisor group interview ....................................
Program manager/supervisor individual interviews .............................
Frontline staff individual interviews ......................................................
Semi-annual progress reports .............................................................
Case enrollment log .............................................................................
Service log ...........................................................................................
Staff survey ..........................................................................................
Partner Survey .....................................................................................
Administrative data ..............................................................................
Outcome master instrument (data entry and uploading) .....................
Impact master instrument (data entry and uploading) ........................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 15,490.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:27 Sep 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
Number of
responses per
respondent
17
153
102
102
17
51
102
340
340
17
17
8
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
Email address: infocollection@
acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be
identified by the title of the information
collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Average
burden hours
per response
1
1
1
1
2
30
780
1
1
2
2
2
1.34
1.34
0.67
0.67
16.5
0.25
0.05
0.34
0.34
93.5
189
69
Total
burden hours
22.8
205
68.3
68.3
561
382.5
3978
115.6
115.6
3,179
6426
1104
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Notices
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–22774 Filed 9–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) Cybersecurity
Education Office (CEO) National
Initiative for Cybersecurity Careers and
Studies (NICCS) Cybersecurity
Training and Education Catalog
(Training Catalog) Collection
AGENCY:
Cybersecurity Education Office,
DHS.
30-Day Notice and request for
comments; New Collection (Request for
a new OMB Control No.), 1601–NEW.
ACTION:
The Department of Homeland
Security, Cybersecurity Education
Office, DHS will submit the following
information collection request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). DHS previously
published this information collection
request (ICR) in the Federal Register on
June 12, 2013 at 78 FR 35295, for a 60day public comment period. No
comments were received by DHS. The
purpose of this notice is to allow
additional 30-days for public comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until October 21, 2013.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to OMB Desk Officer, Department of
Homeland Security and sent via
electronic mail to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–5806.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:27 Sep 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
additional information is required
contact: The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), Cybersecurity
Education Office, DHS Attn.: Michael
Wigal, dhs.pra@hq.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II,
Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C.
121(d)(1) To access, receive, and
analyze law enforcement information,
intelligence information and other
information from agencies of the Federal
Government, State and local
government agencies * * * and Private
sector entities and to integrate such
information in support of the mission
responsibilities of the Department. The
following authorities also permit DHS to
collect information of the type
contemplated: Federal Information
Security Management Act of 2002
(FISMA), 44 U.S.C. 3546; Homeland
Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)
7, ‘‘Critical Infrastructure Identification,
Prioritization, and Protection’’ (2003);
and NSPD–54/HSPD–23, ‘‘Cybersecurity
Policy’’ (2009).
In May 2009, the President ordered a
Cyberspace Policy Review to develop a
comprehensive approach to secure and
defend America’s infrastructure. The
review built upon the Comprehensive
National Cybersecurity Initiative (CNCI).
In response to increased cyber threats
across the Nation, the National Initiative
for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)
expanded from a previous effort, the
CNCI #8. NICE formed in March 2011,
and is a nationally coordinated effort
comprised of over 20 federal
departments and agencies, and
numerous partners in academia and
industry. NICE focuses on cybersecurity
awareness, education, training and
professional development. NICE seeks
to encourage and build cybersecurity
awareness and competency across the
Nation and to develop an agile, highly
skilled cybersecurity workforce.
The NICCS Portal is a national online
resource for cybersecurity awareness,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57643
education, talent management, and
professional development and training.
NICCS Portal is an implementation tool
for NICE. Its mission is to provide
comprehensive cybersecurity resources
to the public.
To promote cybersecurity education,
and to provide a comprehensive
resource for the Nation, NICE developed
the Cybersecurity Training and
Education Catalog. The Cybersecurity
Training and Education Catalog will be
hosted on the NICCS Portal. Both
Training Course and Certification
information will be stored in the
Training Catalog.
Note: Any information received from
the public in support of the NICCS
Portal and Cybersecurity Training and
Education Catalog is completely
voluntary. Organizations and
individuals who do not provide
information can still utilize the NICCS
Portal and Cybersecurity Training and
Education Catalog without restriction or
penalty. An organization or individual
who wants their information removed
from the NICCS Portal and/or
Cybersecurity Training and Education
Catalog can email the NICCS
Supervisory Office (SO).
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Cybersecurity Education Office
(CEO) intends for the collected
information from the NICCS
Cybersecurity Training Course Form
and the NICCS Cybersecurity
Certification Form to be displayed on a
publicly accessible Web site called the
National Initiative for Cybersecurity
Careers and Studies (NICCS) Portal
(https://niccs.us-cert.gov/). Collected
information from the NICCS
Cybersecurity Training Course Form
and the NICCS Cybersecurity
Certification Form will be included in
the Cybersecurity Training and
Education Catalog. Both sets of
information will be made available to
the public to support the National
Initiative for Cybersecurity Education
(NICE) mission and the Comprehensive
National Cybersecurity Initiative
(CNCI)—Initiative 8: Expand Cyber
Education.
The DHS CEO NICCS Supervisory
Office will use information collected
from the NICCS Vetting Criteria Form to
primarily manage communications with
the training providers; this collected
information will not be shared with the
public and is intended for internal use
only. Additionally, this information will
be used to validate training providers
and certification owners before
uploading their training course or
certification information to the Training
Catalog.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57641-57643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22774]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
The President signed the Child and Family Services Improvement and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-34) into law on September 30, 2011. This
act includes a targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social
Security Act), which directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services
(HHS) to reserve a specified portion for Regional Partnership Grants,
designed to improve the well-being of children affected by parental
substance abuse. On September 28, 2012, CB/ACYF awarded new 5-year RPG
grants to 17 partnerships in 15 states. The overall objective of the
Cross-Site Evaluation and Technical Assistance project (the RPG Cross-
Site Evaluation) is to plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national
cross-site evaluation of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislatively-
mandated performance measurement, and furnish evaluation-related
technical assistance to the grantees in order to improve the quality
and rigor of their local evaluations. The project will evaluate the
programs and activities conducted through the RPG Grant Program.
Title: RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation Technical
Assistance.
OMB No.: New collection.
Description: The Children's Bureau within the Administration for
Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services seeks approval to collect information for the Regional
Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-being of and to Improve
Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse (known as
the Regional Partnership Grants Program or ``RPG'') Cross-Site
Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Technical Assistance project. Under
RPG, the Children's Bureau has issued 17 grants to organizations such
as child welfare or substance abuse treatment providers or family court
systems to develop interagency collaborations and integration of
programs, activities, and services designed to increase well-being,
improve permanency, and enhance the safety of children who are in an
out-of-home placement or are at risk of being placed in out-of-home
care as a result of a parent's or caretaker's substance abuse. The
Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
34) includes a targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social
Security Act) that directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services
to reserve a specified portion of the appropriation for these Regional
Partnership Grants, to be used to improve the well-being of children
affected by substance abuse. The overall objective of the Cross-Site
Evaluation and Technical Assistance project (the RPG Cross-Site
Evaluation) is to plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national
cross-site evaluation of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislatively-
mandated performance measurement, and furnish evaluation-related
technical assistance to the grantees in order to improve the quality
and rigor of their local evaluations. The project will evaluate the
programs and activities conducted through the RPG Grant Program. The
evaluation is being undertaken by the Children's Bureau and its
contractor Mathematica Policy Research. The evaluation is being
implemented by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors,
Walter R. McDonald & Associates and Synergy Enterprises.
The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation will include the following
components:
1. Implementation and Partnership Study. The RPG cross-site
implementation and partnership study will contribute to building the
knowledge base about effective implementation strategies by examining
the process of implementation in the 17 RPG projects, with a focus on
factors shown in the research literature to be associated with quality
implementation of evidence-based programs. This component of the study
will describe the RPG projects' target populations, selected
interventions and their fit with the target populations, inputs to
implementation, and actual services provided (including dosage,
duration, content, adherence to curricula, and participant
responsiveness). It will examine the key attributes of the regional
partnerships that grantees develop (for example, partnerships among
child welfare and substance abuse treatment providers, social services,
and the courts). It will describe the characteristics and roles of the
partner organizations, the extent of coordination and collaboration,
and their potential to sustain the partnerships after the grant ends.
Key data collection activities of the implementation and partnership
study are: (1) Conducting site visits during which researchers will
interview RPG program directors, managers, supervisors, and frontline
staff who work directly with families; (2) administering a survey to
frontline staff involved in providing direct services to children,
adults, and families; (3) asking grantees to provide information about
implementation and their partnerships as part of their federally
required semi-
[[Page 57642]]
annual progress reports; (4) obtaining service use data from grantees,
enrollment date and demographics of enrollees, exit date and reason,
and service participation, to be entered into a web-based system
developed and operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors; and (5) administering a survey to representatives of
the partner organizations.
2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the outcomes study is to describe
the changes that occur in children and families who participate in the
RPG programs. This study will describe participant outcomes in five
domains: (1) Child well-being, (2) family functioning/stability, (3)
adult recovery from substance use, (4) child permanency, and (5) child
safety. Two main types of outcome data will be used--both of which are
being collected by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative child welfare and
adult substance abuse treatment records and (2) standardized
instruments administered to the parents and/or caregivers. The
Children's Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain and report specified
administrative records, and to use a prescribed set of standardized
instruments. Grantees will provide these data to the Cross-Site
Evaluation team twice a year by uploading them to a data system
developed and operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors.
3. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to assess the
impact of the RPG interventions on child, adult, and family outcomes by
comparing outcomes for people enrolled in RPG services to those in
comparison groups, such as people who do not receive RPG services or
receive only a subset of the services. The impact study will use
demographic and outcome data on both program (treatment) and comparison
groups from a subset of grantees with appropriate local evaluation
designs such as randomized controlled trials or strong quasi-
experimental designs; 8 of the 17 grantees have such designs. Site-
specific impacts will be estimated for these eight grantees. Aggregated
impact estimates will be created by pooling impact estimates across
appropriate sites to obtain a more powerful summary of the
effectiveness of RPG interventions.
In addition to conducting local evaluations and participating in
the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees are legislatively
required to report performance indicators aligned with their proposed
program strategies and activities. A key strategy of the RPG Cross-Site
Evaluation is to minimize burden on the grantees by ensuring that the
cross-site evaluation, which includes all grantees in a study that
collects data to report on implementation, the partnerships, and
participant characteristics and outcomes, fully meets the need for
performance reporting. Thus, rather than collecting separate evaluation
and performance indicator data, the grantees need only participate in
the cross-site evaluation. In addition, using the standardized
instruments that the Children's Bureau has specified will ensure that
grantees have valid and reliable data on child and family outcomes for
their local evaluations. The inclusion of an impact study conducted on
a subset of grantees with rigorous designs will also provide the
Children's Bureau, Congress, grantees, providers, and researchers with
information about the effectiveness of RPG programs. This 60-Day Notice
covers the following data collection activities: (1) The site visits
with grantees; (2) the web-based survey of frontline staff who provide
direct services to children, adults, and families, and their
supervisors; (3) the semi-annual progress reports; (4) enrollment and
service data provided by grantees; (5) the web-based survey of grantee
partners; and (6) outcome data provided by grantees.
Respondents: Respondents include grantee staff or contractors (such
as local evaluators) and partner staff. Specific types of respondents
and the expected number per data collection effort are noted in the
burden table below.
Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Instrument Number of responses per hours per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program director individual interview..... 17 1 1.34 22.8
Program manager/supervisor group interview 153 1 1.34 205
Program manager/supervisor individual 102 1 0.67 68.3
interviews...............................
Frontline staff individual interviews..... 102 1 0.67 68.3
Semi-annual progress reports.............. 17 2 16.5 561
Case enrollment log....................... 51 30 0.25 382.5
Service log............................... 102 780 0.05 3978
Staff survey.............................. 340 1 0.34 115.6
Partner Survey............................ 340 1 0.34 115.6
Administrative data....................... 17 2 93.5 3,179
Outcome master instrument (data entry and 17 2 189 6426
uploading)...............................
Impact master instrument (data entry and 8 2 69 1104
uploading)...............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,490.
In compliance with the requirements of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above. Copies of the proposed
collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded
by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW.,
Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or
[[Page 57643]]
other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-22774 Filed 9-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
