Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comments Requested: Request for ATF Background Investigation Information, 57415-57416 [2013-22618]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Notices
independently sold Wii MotionPlus and
Nunchuck accessories contributorily
infringe the asserted claim of the ’917
and ’742 patents; (c) anticipation and
obviousness with respect to the asserted
claim of the ’917 patent; (d) obviousness
with respect to the asserted claim of the
’742 patent; and (e) whether CK has
satisfied the technical prong of the
domestic industry requirement with
respect to the ’917 and ’742 patents, and
if necessary, whether CK has satisfied
the economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement with respect to the
’917 and 742 patent in light of the ALJ’s
technical prong determination.
On May 7, 2013, the ALJ issued a
remand ID finding no violation of
section 337. The ALJ found that (i)
Respondents do not infringe claim 7 of
the ’917 patent; (ii) respondents do not
contribute to the infringement of claim
24 of the ’742 patent; (iii) the asserted
claim of the ’917 patent is not invalid
for anticipation; (iv) the asserted claim
of the ’917 patent is not invalid for
obviousness; (v) the asserted claim of
the ’742 patent is not invalid for
obviousness; (vi) complainant has
satisfied the technical prong of the
domestic industry requirement for the
’917 patent; and (vii) complainant has
satisfied the technical prong of the
domestic industry requirement for the
’742 patent. The ALJ determined that it
was unnecessary to revisit his previous
finding in his final ID that complainant
has not satisfied the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement for
the ’742 and ’917 patents.
On July 8, 2013, the Commission
determined to review the following
issues from the remand ID: (1) Whether
the accused products directly infringe
the asserted claim of the ’917 patent; (2)
whether the independently sold Wii
MotionPlus and Nunchuck accessories
contributorily infringe the asserted
claim of the ’742 patent; (3) nonobviousness of the asserted claim of the
’742 patent; and (4) whether the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement is met with respect to the
’917 and ’742 patents. The Commission
noted that the following issues from the
final ID are currently under review: (a)
Whether the accused products directly
infringe the asserted claim of the ’742
patent; (b) validity of the asserted claims
of the ’917 and ’742 patent under the
enablement requirement; (c) validity of
the asserted claims of the ’917 and ’742
patent under the written description
requirement; and (d) whether the
economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement is met with
respect to the ’917 and ’742 patents.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ALJ’s final
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Sep 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
ID, remand ID, and the submissions of
the parties, the Commission has
determined to affirm, with
modifications, the ALJ’s finding of no
violation of Section 337. Specifically,
the Commission has determined to
affirm, with modifications, the ALJ’s
finding that claim 7 of the ’917 patent
and claim 24 of the ’742 patent are
invalid for lack of enablement and for
lack of written description, and that
complainant has not shown that the
domestic industry requirement is met
with respect to the ’917 and ’742
patents. The Commission has
determined that complainant has not
shown that the accused products
directly infringe claim 7 of the ’917
patent because they do not meet the
limitation ‘‘command,’’ and that
complainant has not shown that the
accused products directly infringe claim
24 of the ’742 patent because they do
not meet the limitation ‘‘activate or
control.’’ The Commission has also
determined that complainant has not
shown that the independently sold Wii
MotionPlus and Nunchuck accessories
contributorily infringe claim 24 of the
’742 patent. Lastly, the Commission has
determined that respondent has not
shown that claim 24 of the ’742 patent
is obvious.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–46 and 210.50 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46 and
210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 12, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–22643 Filed 9–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
57415
relief from and impose civil penalties
against the Defendant for violating the
Clean Water Act by discharging
pollutants without a permit into waters
of the United States. The proposed
Consent Decree resolves these
allegations by requiring the Defendant
to perform mitigation and to pay a civil
penalty.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Assistant United States Attorney Adam
J. Katz, James T. Foley Courthouse, 445
Broadway, Room 218, Albany, NY
12207, and refer to United States v.
Stonybrook Land, LLC, USAO #
2010V00052.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office of the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of New York, James T.
Foley Courthouse, 445 Broadway, Suite
509, Albany, NY 12207. In addition, the
proposed Consent Decree may be
examined electronically at https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_
Decrees.html.
Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment and Natural
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–22635 Filed 9–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Request for
ATF Background Investigation
Information
60-Day Notice.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
ACTION:
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF), will submit the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. Comments are
encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until November 18, 2013.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. Stonybrook Land, LLC,
Civil Action No. 1:13–CV–1119 (TJM/
RFT), was lodged with the United States
District Court for the Northern District
of New York on September 10, 2013.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Defendant
Stonybrook Land, LLC, pursuant to
Clean Water Act Section 404(s), 33
U.S.C. 1344(s), to obtain injunctive
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
57416
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Notices
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Renee Reid, Chief
Personnel Security Branch at
Renee.Reid@atf.gov.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Summary of Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
New collection of information.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Request for ATF Background
Investigation Information.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: ATF F
8620.65; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal
Government. Other: Federal
Government.
Need for Collection
This form is necessary to maintain a
record of another agency’s official
request for an individual’s background
investigation record. The documented
request will assist ATF in ensuring that
unauthorized disclosures of information
do not occur.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 300
respondents will complete a 5 minute
form.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Sep 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 25
annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
Department of Justice, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3W–
1407B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: September 12, 2013.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2013–22618 Filed 9–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs
Division of Longshore and Harbor
Workers’ Compensation Proposed
Revision of Existing Collection;
Comment Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the Office
of Workers’ Compensation Programs
(OWCP) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed collection:
Regulations Governing the
Administration of the Longshore and
Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act
(LS–200, LS–201, LS–203, LS–204, LS–
262, LS–267, LS–271, LS–274, and LS–
513). A copy of the proposed
information collection request can be
obtained by contacting the office listed
below in the address section of this
Notice.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addresses section below on or before
November 18, 2013.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ms. Yoon Ferguson, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Ave. NW., Room S–3201, Washington,
DC 20210, telephone (202) 693–0701,
fax (202) 693–1447, Email
ferguson.yoon@dol.gov. Please use only
one method of transmission for
comments (mail, fax, or Email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
The Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs (OWCP) administers the
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act (LHWCA). LHWCA
provides benefits to workers injured in
maritime employment on the navigable
waters of the United States or in an
adjoining area customarily used by an
employer in loading, unloading,
repairing, or building a vessel. In
addition, several Acts extend the
Longshore Act’s benefits and procedures
to certain other employees. The
information collections in this package
are necessary for proper administration
of the provisions of the LHWCA and its
extensions. This information collection
is currently approved for use through
August 31, 2015. However, one of the
forms in this package, the LS–513
(Report of Payments), is now being
modified slightly to include the
collection of additional data which has
caused a change in burden. The LS–513
is used by insurance carriers and selfinsured employers to annually report
the total amount of payments made
under the LHWCA and its extensions.
The modifications to the LS–513 will
affect only those few carriers and selfinsured employers making payments
under the Defense Base Act (DBA), one
of the LHWCA’s extensions. These
entities will now be required to report
their DBA payments by contracting
agency (i.e., the government agency
with which the injured worker’s
employer contracted) on the form.
OWCP needs this information to better
cross-reference the information
submitted on the LS–202 (Employer’s
First Report of Injury or Occupational
Illness) and to adequately monitor DBA
claims processing and compliance.
OWCP estimates that the LS–513
modification will increase total burden
for the form by only 5 hours. While
respondents who do not currently
capture the contracting-agency data in a
way that can be easily retrieved and
reported may incur additional costs to
adapt their information technology
systems to this reporting requirement,
these costs will be limited to the first
year. OWCP estimates the additional
first-year cost to be $769.40 per
respondent.
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57415-57416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22618]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140-NEW]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Request for ATF Background Investigation
Information
ACTION: 60-Day Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will submit the following information
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged
and will be accepted for ``sixty days'' until November 18, 2013. This
process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or
[[Page 57416]]
associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with instructions or additional
information, please contact Renee Reid, Chief Personnel Security Branch
at Renee.Reid@atf.gov.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following
four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Summary of Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: New collection of information.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Request for ATF Background
Investigation Information.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number: ATF F
8620.65; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal Government.
Other: Federal Government.
Need for Collection
This form is necessary to maintain a record of another agency's
official request for an individual's background investigation record.
The documented request will assist ATF in ensuring that unauthorized
disclosures of information do not occur.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated
that 300 respondents will complete a 5 minute form.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: There are an estimated 25 annual total burden
hours associated with this collection.
If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice
Management Division, Department of Justice, Two Constitution Square,
145 N Street NE., Room 3W-1407B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: September 12, 2013.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2013-22618 Filed 9-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P
