Waiver of Requirement To Enter Into a Reciprocal Waiver of Claims Agreement With All Customers for Orbital Sciences Corporation, 57215-57216 [2013-22566]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 17, 2013 / Notices
Issued in Washington, DC. on September 4,
2013.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger
Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2013–22557 Filed 9–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Waiver of Requirement To Enter Into a
Reciprocal Waiver of Claims
Agreement With All Customers for
Orbital Sciences Corporation
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of waiver.
AGENCY:
This notice concerns a
petition for waiver submitted to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
by Orbital Sciences Corporation
(Orbital) to waive in part the
requirement that a launch operator enter
into a reciprocal waiver of claims with
each customer. The FAA grants the
petition.
SUMMARY:
For
technical questions concerning this
waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman,
Licensing Program Lead, Commercial
Space Transportation—Licensing and
Evaluation Division, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–7715; email:
Phil.Brinkman@faa.gov. For legal
questions concerning this waiver,
contact Sabrina Jawed, AttorneyAdviser, Space Law Branch, AGC–250,
Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulations
Division, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–8839; email:
Sabrina.Jawed@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
waiver of claims (a ‘‘cross-waiver’’) with
each of its customers.
The FAA licenses the launch of a
launch vehicle and reentry of a reentry
vehicle under authority granted to the
Secretary of Transportation by the
Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984,
as amended and re-codified by 51 U.S.C.
Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter 509),
and delegated to the FAA Administrator
and the Associate Administrator for
Commercial Space Transportation, who
exercises licensing authority under
Chapter 509.
The petition for waiver applies to
Orbital’s September 2013 launch of an
Antares launch vehicle and Orbital’s
Cygnus pressurized cargo module to be
used in the delivery of cargo to the
International Space Station (ISS). The
Cygnus cargo module will carry cargo
for NASA to resupply the ISS. In
addition to the ISS supplies, the Antares
may also carry other payloads whose
transport NASA has arranged as part of
the Johnson Space Center cargo. These
consist of a NanoRacks, LLC, and
NanoRacks locker insert and student
experiments created under NASA’s
Student Spaceflight Experiments
Program (SSEP). NASA describes SSEP
as a national science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics education
initiative.2 According to its Space Act
Agreement with NASA,3 NanoRacks
arranges to carry the student
experiments on a locker insert to put
into an experimental locker on board
the ISS. The Space Act Agreement states
that NASA will provide on-orbit
resources and limited launch
opportunities to NanoRacks for the
launch of its insert and the experiments
the insert carries. Orbital provided the
FAA, along with its petition for waiver,
a letter signed by Christopher Cummins,
Chief Operating Officer of NanoRacks,
stating that NanoRacks will not have
any personnel at the launch site for the
OrbD–1 4 launch, which is the launch
that is the subject of this waiver.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On August 8, 2013, Orbital submitted
a petition to the FAA’s Office of
Commercial Space Transportation (AST)
requesting a waiver under its launch
license for flight of an Antares launch
vehicle carrying Orbital’s Cygnus
module.1 Orbital requested a partial
waiver of 14 CFR 440.17, which requires
a licensee to enter into a reciprocal
1 This mission is also referred to as OrbD–1. See
Letter from Mark A. Wright, Manager, Safety
Inspection Division AST, to Natalie Imfeld,
Contracts Manager, Advanced Programs Group
Orbital Sciences Corporation (August 16, 2013) (on
file with FAA) (referring to Antares launch of the
Cygnus payload as ORB–D1 Mission).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:05 Sep 16, 2013
Jkt 229001
2 Space Station—Here we Come! NASA Press
Release: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/
foreducators/station-here-we-come.html (last
visited August 16, 2013).
3 Nonreimbursable Space Act Agreement Between
NanoRacks, LLC and NASA for Operation of the
NanoRacks System Aboard the International Space
Station National Laboratory, (Sept. 4 and 9 2009)
(NanoRacks Agreement), 387938main—SAA—
SOMD—6355—NanoRacks—ISS—National—
Lab.pdf.
4 OrbD–1 refers to the COTS Demo mission
currently scheduled to launch in September on the
Antares launch vehicle from Wallops. See Letter
from Mark A. Wright, Manager, Safety Inspection
Division AST, to Natalie Imfeld, Contracts Manager,
Advanced Programs Group Orbital Sciences
Corporation (August 16, 2013) (on file with author)
(referring to Antares launch of the Cygnus payload
as ORB–D1 Mission).
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57215
NanoRacks and each student who
places a payload on board the
NanoRacks insert qualify as customers
under the FAA’s definitions. Section
440.3 defines a customer, in relevant
part, as any person with rights in the
payload or any part of the payload, or
any person who has placed property on
board the payload for launch, reentry, or
payload services. A person is an
individual or an entity organized or
existing under the laws of a State or
country. 51 U.S.C. 50901(12), 14 CFR
401.5. The subjects of this waiver are
persons because the students are
individuals and NanoRacks is an entity,
a limited liability corporation.
Accordingly, because NanoRacks and
the students are persons who have
rights in their respective payloads, the
locker insert and the experiments, due
to their ownership of those objects, and
because they have placed property on
board, they are customers. Section
440.17 requires their signatures as
customers.
In this instance, however, NanoRacks
and the students are also subject to a
NASA reciprocal waivers of claims, a
cross-waiver, which is governed by
NASA’s regulations at 14 CFR part 1266.
Article 8 of the Space Act Agreement
between NASA and NanoRacks governs
liability and risk of loss and establishes
a cross-waiver of liability.
Other than the NanoRacks and SSEP
customers, all other customers as
defined by 14 CFR 440.3 will execute
the cross-waivers required by 14 CFR
440.17. The cross-waivers among
Orbital and all customers, other than
NanoRacks and SSEP customers, are
amended to provide that signing
customers waive claims against any
other customer as defined by 14 CFR
440.3. The petition for partial waiver of
the requirement that the licensee
implement a cross-waiver with each
customer applies to NanoRacks and the
SSEP customers as customers of the
September 2013 launch of the Antares
launch vehicle carrying the Cygnus
module.
Waiver Criteria
Chapter 509 allows the FAA to waive
a license requirement if the waiver (1)
will not jeopardize public health and
safety, safety of property; (2) will not
jeopardize national security and foreign
policy interests of the United States; and
(3) will be in the public interest. 51
U.S.C. 50905(b)(3) (2013); 14 CFR
404.5(b) (2013).
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
57216
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 17, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Waiver of FAA Requirement for Each
Customer To Sign a Reciprocal Waiver
of Claims
The FAA waives 14 CFR 440.17,
which requires a licensee to enter into
a reciprocal waiver of claims with each
of its customers with respect to
NanoRacks and the SSEP participants
for the September 2013 Antares launch.
In 1988, as part of a comprehensive
financial responsibility and risk sharing
regime that protects launch participants
and the U.S. Government from the risks
of catastrophic loss and litigation,
Congress required that all launch
participants agree to waive claims
against each other for their own
property damage or loss, and to cover
losses experienced by their own
employees. 51 U.S.C. 50915(b). This
part of the regime was intended to
relieve launch participants of the
burden of obtaining property insurance
by having each party be responsible for
the loss of its own property and to limit
the universe of claims that might arise
as a result of a launch. H. Rep. 100–639,
at 11–12 (1988); S. Rep. 100–593, at 14,
(1988); Financial Responsibility
Requirements for Licensed Launch
Activities, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 61 FR 38992, 39011 (Jul.
25, 1996). The FAA’s implementing
regulations may be found at 14 CFR part
440.
In its request for a waiver, Orbital
submits that the NASA Space Act
Agreement reciprocal waivers of claims
imposed on NanoRacks and the SSEP
participants are equivalent to the
requirements imposed on each customer
under the FAA’s requirements of 14
CFR part 440. A comparison of the two
regimes shows that in this particular
situation the two sets of cross-waivers
are sufficiently similar that the statutory
goals of 51 U.S.C. 50914(b) will be met
by the FAA agreeing to accept the
NASA cross-waivers in this instance.
The FAA cross-waivers require the
launch participants, including the U.S.
Government and each customer, and
their respective contractors and
subcontractors, to waive and release
claims against all the other parties to the
waiver and agree to assume financial
responsibility for property damage
sustained by that party and for bodily
injury or property damage sustained by
the party’s own employees, and to hold
harmless and indemnify each other from
bodily injury or property damage
sustained by their respective employees
resulting from the licensed activity,
regardless of fault. 14 CFR 440.17(b) and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:05 Sep 16, 2013
Jkt 229001
(c). Each party 5 to the cross-waiver
must indemnify the other parties from
claims by the indemnifying party’s
contractors and subcontractors if the
indemnifying party fails to properly
extend the requirements of the crosswaivers to its contractors and
subcontractors. 14 CFR 440.17(d). A
comparison of each element shows that,
although there are some differences,
because the NASA cross-waiver signed
by NanoRacks is consistent with
Congressional intent and the FAA’s
regulations, because relevant employees
will not be present at the launch site,
and because the Orbital cross-waiver
submitted to the FAA has been
amended to protect non-signing
customers, NanoRacks and the SSEP
participants need not sign a crosswaiver under 14 CFR part 440.
For the reasons stated in the waiver
the FAA published for SpaceX on
October 16, 2012,6 and for the reasons
stated above, the FAA finds that this
waiver implicates no safety, national
security or foreign policy issues. The
waiver is consistent with the public
interest goals of Chapter 509. Under 51
U.S.C. 50914, Congress determined that
it was necessary to reduce the costs
associated with insurance and litigation
by requiring launch participants,
including customers, to waive claims
against each other. Because the
NanoRacks Agreement under 14 CFR
part 1266 accomplishes these goals by
the same or similar means, the FAA
finds this request in the public interest,
and grants the waiver with respect to
NanoRacks and the SSEP participants in
reliance on the representations Orbital
made in its petition.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
10, 2013.
Kenneth Wong,
Commercial Space Transportation, Licensing
and Evaluation Division Manager.
[FR Doc. 2013–22566 Filed 9–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
5 Indemnification by the U.S. Government is
conditioned upon the passage of legislation. 51
U.S.C. 50915; 14 CFR 440.17(d).
6 Waiver of Requirement to Enter Into a
Reciprocal Waiver of Claims Agreement With All
Customers, Notice of Waiver, 77 FR 63221 (Oct. 16,
2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0165; Notice 1]
General Motors, LLC, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
General Motors, LLC (GM) 1
has determined that certain model year
(MY) 2011 through 2013 Buick Regal
and MY 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
passenger cars may not fully comply
with the telltale bulb outage
requirement found in paragraph S5.5.6
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No 108, Lamps,
Reflective Devices, and Associated
Equipment. GM has filed an appropriate
report dated October 3, 2012, pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
DATES: October 17, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Mail: Send by mail addressed to:
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
SUMMARY:
1 General Motors, LLC is a manufacturer of motor
vehicles and is registered under the laws of the state
of Michigan.
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57215-57216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22566]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Waiver of Requirement To Enter Into a Reciprocal Waiver of Claims
Agreement With All Customers for Orbital Sciences Corporation
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice concerns a petition for waiver submitted to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by Orbital Sciences Corporation
(Orbital) to waive in part the requirement that a launch operator enter
into a reciprocal waiver of claims with each customer. The FAA grants
the petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman, Licensing Program Lead,
Commercial Space Transportation--Licensing and Evaluation Division, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
7715; email: Phil.Brinkman@faa.gov. For legal questions concerning this
waiver, contact Sabrina Jawed, Attorney-Adviser, Space Law Branch, AGC-
250, Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone (202) 267-8839; email: Sabrina.Jawed@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 8, 2013, Orbital submitted a petition to the FAA's Office
of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) requesting a waiver under its
launch license for flight of an Antares launch vehicle carrying
Orbital's Cygnus module.\1\ Orbital requested a partial waiver of 14
CFR 440.17, which requires a licensee to enter into a reciprocal waiver
of claims (a ``cross-waiver'') with each of its customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This mission is also referred to as OrbD-1. See Letter from
Mark A. Wright, Manager, Safety Inspection Division AST, to Natalie
Imfeld, Contracts Manager, Advanced Programs Group Orbital Sciences
Corporation (August 16, 2013) (on file with FAA) (referring to
Antares launch of the Cygnus payload as ORB-D1 Mission).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA licenses the launch of a launch vehicle and reentry of a
reentry vehicle under authority granted to the Secretary of
Transportation by the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended
and re-codified by 51 U.S.C. Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter 509), and
delegated to the FAA Administrator and the Associate Administrator for
Commercial Space Transportation, who exercises licensing authority
under Chapter 509.
The petition for waiver applies to Orbital's September 2013 launch
of an Antares launch vehicle and Orbital's Cygnus pressurized cargo
module to be used in the delivery of cargo to the International Space
Station (ISS). The Cygnus cargo module will carry cargo for NASA to
resupply the ISS. In addition to the ISS supplies, the Antares may also
carry other payloads whose transport NASA has arranged as part of the
Johnson Space Center cargo. These consist of a NanoRacks, LLC, and
NanoRacks locker insert and student experiments created under NASA's
Student Spaceflight Experiments Program (SSEP). NASA describes SSEP as
a national science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education
initiative.\2\ According to its Space Act Agreement with NASA,\3\
NanoRacks arranges to carry the student experiments on a locker insert
to put into an experimental locker on board the ISS. The Space Act
Agreement states that NASA will provide on-orbit resources and limited
launch opportunities to NanoRacks for the launch of its insert and the
experiments the insert carries. Orbital provided the FAA, along with
its petition for waiver, a letter signed by Christopher Cummins, Chief
Operating Officer of NanoRacks, stating that NanoRacks will not have
any personnel at the launch site for the OrbD-1 \4\ launch, which is
the launch that is the subject of this waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Space Station--Here we Come! NASA Press Release: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/station-here-we-come.html (last
visited August 16, 2013).
\3\ Nonreimbursable Space Act Agreement Between NanoRacks, LLC
and NASA for Operation of the NanoRacks System Aboard the
International Space Station National Laboratory, (Sept. 4 and 9
2009) (NanoRacks Agreement), 387938main--SAA--SOMD--6355--
NanoRacks--ISS--National--Lab.pdf.
\4\ OrbD-1 refers to the COTS Demo mission currently scheduled
to launch in September on the Antares launch vehicle from Wallops.
See Letter from Mark A. Wright, Manager, Safety Inspection Division
AST, to Natalie Imfeld, Contracts Manager, Advanced Programs Group
Orbital Sciences Corporation (August 16, 2013) (on file with author)
(referring to Antares launch of the Cygnus payload as ORB-D1
Mission).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NanoRacks and each student who places a payload on board the
NanoRacks insert qualify as customers under the FAA's definitions.
Section 440.3 defines a customer, in relevant part, as any person with
rights in the payload or any part of the payload, or any person who has
placed property on board the payload for launch, reentry, or payload
services. A person is an individual or an entity organized or existing
under the laws of a State or country. 51 U.S.C. 50901(12), 14 CFR
401.5. The subjects of this waiver are persons because the students are
individuals and NanoRacks is an entity, a limited liability
corporation. Accordingly, because NanoRacks and the students are
persons who have rights in their respective payloads, the locker insert
and the experiments, due to their ownership of those objects, and
because they have placed property on board, they are customers. Section
440.17 requires their signatures as customers.
In this instance, however, NanoRacks and the students are also
subject to a NASA reciprocal waivers of claims, a cross-waiver, which
is governed by NASA's regulations at 14 CFR part 1266. Article 8 of the
Space Act Agreement between NASA and NanoRacks governs liability and
risk of loss and establishes a cross-waiver of liability.
Other than the NanoRacks and SSEP customers, all other customers as
defined by 14 CFR 440.3 will execute the cross-waivers required by 14
CFR 440.17. The cross-waivers among Orbital and all customers, other
than NanoRacks and SSEP customers, are amended to provide that signing
customers waive claims against any other customer as defined by 14 CFR
440.3. The petition for partial waiver of the requirement that the
licensee implement a cross-waiver with each customer applies to
NanoRacks and the SSEP customers as customers of the September 2013
launch of the Antares launch vehicle carrying the Cygnus module.
Waiver Criteria
Chapter 509 allows the FAA to waive a license requirement if the
waiver (1) will not jeopardize public health and safety, safety of
property; (2) will not jeopardize national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States; and (3) will be in the public interest.
51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(3) (2013); 14 CFR 404.5(b) (2013).
[[Page 57216]]
Waiver of FAA Requirement for Each Customer To Sign a Reciprocal Waiver
of Claims
The FAA waives 14 CFR 440.17, which requires a licensee to enter
into a reciprocal waiver of claims with each of its customers with
respect to NanoRacks and the SSEP participants for the September 2013
Antares launch.
In 1988, as part of a comprehensive financial responsibility and
risk sharing regime that protects launch participants and the U.S.
Government from the risks of catastrophic loss and litigation, Congress
required that all launch participants agree to waive claims against
each other for their own property damage or loss, and to cover losses
experienced by their own employees. 51 U.S.C. 50915(b). This part of
the regime was intended to relieve launch participants of the burden of
obtaining property insurance by having each party be responsible for
the loss of its own property and to limit the universe of claims that
might arise as a result of a launch. H. Rep. 100-639, at 11-12 (1988);
S. Rep. 100-593, at 14, (1988); Financial Responsibility Requirements
for Licensed Launch Activities, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 61 FR
38992, 39011 (Jul. 25, 1996). The FAA's implementing regulations may be
found at 14 CFR part 440.
In its request for a waiver, Orbital submits that the NASA Space
Act Agreement reciprocal waivers of claims imposed on NanoRacks and the
SSEP participants are equivalent to the requirements imposed on each
customer under the FAA's requirements of 14 CFR part 440. A comparison
of the two regimes shows that in this particular situation the two sets
of cross-waivers are sufficiently similar that the statutory goals of
51 U.S.C. 50914(b) will be met by the FAA agreeing to accept the NASA
cross-waivers in this instance.
The FAA cross-waivers require the launch participants, including
the U.S. Government and each customer, and their respective contractors
and subcontractors, to waive and release claims against all the other
parties to the waiver and agree to assume financial responsibility for
property damage sustained by that party and for bodily injury or
property damage sustained by the party's own employees, and to hold
harmless and indemnify each other from bodily injury or property damage
sustained by their respective employees resulting from the licensed
activity, regardless of fault. 14 CFR 440.17(b) and (c). Each party \5\
to the cross-waiver must indemnify the other parties from claims by the
indemnifying party's contractors and subcontractors if the indemnifying
party fails to properly extend the requirements of the cross-waivers to
its contractors and subcontractors. 14 CFR 440.17(d). A comparison of
each element shows that, although there are some differences, because
the NASA cross-waiver signed by NanoRacks is consistent with
Congressional intent and the FAA's regulations, because relevant
employees will not be present at the launch site, and because the
Orbital cross-waiver submitted to the FAA has been amended to protect
non-signing customers, NanoRacks and the SSEP participants need not
sign a cross-waiver under 14 CFR part 440.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Indemnification by the U.S. Government is conditioned upon
the passage of legislation. 51 U.S.C. 50915; 14 CFR 440.17(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons stated in the waiver the FAA published for SpaceX
on October 16, 2012,\6\ and for the reasons stated above, the FAA finds
that this waiver implicates no safety, national security or foreign
policy issues. The waiver is consistent with the public interest goals
of Chapter 509. Under 51 U.S.C. 50914, Congress determined that it was
necessary to reduce the costs associated with insurance and litigation
by requiring launch participants, including customers, to waive claims
against each other. Because the NanoRacks Agreement under 14 CFR part
1266 accomplishes these goals by the same or similar means, the FAA
finds this request in the public interest, and grants the waiver with
respect to NanoRacks and the SSEP participants in reliance on the
representations Orbital made in its petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Waiver of Requirement to Enter Into a Reciprocal Waiver of
Claims Agreement With All Customers, Notice of Waiver, 77 FR 63221
(Oct. 16, 2012).
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 10, 2013.
Kenneth Wong,
Commercial Space Transportation, Licensing and Evaluation Division
Manager.
[FR Doc. 2013-22566 Filed 9-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P