Certified Flight Instructor Flight Reviews; Recent Pilot in Command Experience; Airmen Online Services, 56822-56829 [2013-22485]
Download as PDF
56822
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 61
[Docket No.: FAA–2013–0780; Amdt. No.
61–131]
RIN 2120–AK23
Certified Flight Instructor Flight
Reviews; Recent Pilot in Command
Experience; Airmen Online Services
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule permits an airman
who passes a practical test for issuance
of a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for the addition of a rating
to a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for renewal of a flight
instructor certificate, or a practical test
for the reinstatement of a flight
instructor certificate to meet the 24calendar month flight review
requirements. This rule also clarifies
that the generally applicable recent
flight experience requirements do not
apply to a pilot in command who is
employed by a commuter or on-demand
operator if the pilot in command is in
compliance with the specific pilot in
command qualifications and recent
experience requirements for that
commuter or on-demand operator.
Finally, this rule permits replacement
airman and medical certificates to be
requested online, or by any other
method acceptable to the Administrator.
These changes relieve regulatory
burdens and clarify existing regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 15,
2013.
Submit comments on or before
October 16, 2013. If the FAA receives an
adverse comment or notice of intent to
file an adverse comment, the FAA will
advise the public by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
the effective date of this direct final
rule. This document may withdraw the
direct final rule in whole or in part.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
identified by docket number FAA–
2013–0780 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at (202) 493–2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking
process. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to
https://www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this
action, contact Allan G. Kash, Airmen
Certification and Training Branch,
Flight Standards Service, AFS–810,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
385–9621; email allan.g.kash@faa.gov.
For legal questions concerning this
action, contact Anne Moore, Office of
the Chief Counsel—International Law,
Legislation, and Regulations Division,
AGC–200, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–3123; email
anne.moore@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
United States Code. Subtitle I, Section
106 describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the
scope of the agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
447—Safety Regulation. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
necessary for safety and prescribing
regulations for the issuance of airman
certificates. This final rule is within the
scope of that authority.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Direct Final Rule Procedure
The FAA is adopting this rule without
prior notice and prior public comment
as a direct final rule because it alleviates
unnecessary burdens by expanding the
exceptions to a flight review, removes
redundant recency requirements for
pilots flying for certificated operators
under part 135, and provides a
regulatory basis for the Airmen
Certification Branch to provide Airmen
Online Services. The Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of the
Department of Transportation (DOT) (44
FR 1134, February 26, 1979) provide
that, to the maximum extent possible,
operating administrations for the DOT
should provide an opportunity for
public comment on regulations issued
without prior notice. Accordingly, the
FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by filing
comments, data, or views. The agency
also invites comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting this final rule.
This direct final rule will take effect
on November 15, 2013 unless the FAA
receives an adverse comment or a notice
of intent to file an adverse comment
within the comment period. An adverse
comment explains why a rule would be
inappropriate, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. It may
challenge the rule’s underlying premise
or approach. Under the direct final rule
process, the FAA does not consider the
following types of comments to be
adverse:
• A comment recommending another
rule change, in addition to the change
in the direct final rule at issue. The FAA
considers the comment adverse,
however, if the commenter states why
the direct final rule would be ineffective
without the change.
• A frivolous or insubstantial
comment.
If the FAA receives an adverse
comment or notice of intent to file an
adverse comment, the FAA will advise
the public by publishing a document in
the Federal Register before the effective
date of the final rule. This document
may withdraw the direct final rule in
whole or in part. If the FAA withdraws
a direct final rule because of an adverse
comment, the FAA may incorporate the
commenter’s recommendation into
another direct final rule or may publish
a notice of proposed rulemaking.
If the FAA does not receive an
adverse comment or notice of intent to
file an adverse comment, the FAA will
publish a confirmation document in the
Federal Register, generally within 15
days after the comment period closes.
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The confirmation document confirms to
the public the effective date of the rule.
See the ‘‘Additional Information’’
section for information on how to
comment on this direct final rule and
how the FAA will handle comments
received. The ‘‘Additional Information’’
section also contains related
information about the docket, privacy,
and the handling of proprietary or
confidential business information. In
addition, there is information on
obtaining copies of related rulemaking
documents.
I. Discussion of the Direct Final Rule
Flight Review
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
To act as pilot in command of an
aircraft, § 61.56(c) of Title 14 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
requires a pilot to have satisfactorily
completed a flight review in an aircraft
for which that pilot is rated within 24
calendar months before the month in
which the pilot acts as pilot in
command. The flight review must
consist of a minimum of 1 hour flight
training and 1 hour ground training.1
The purpose of the flight review is to
provide for a regular assessment of pilot
skills and aeronautical knowledge.
When the requirement was first
introduced, the FAA stated that the
flight review would assure that every
pilot would have a qualified individual
comment on his or her competency at
least once every two years, as discussed
in 38 FR 3156 (February 1, 1973). The
flight review also offers pilots the
opportunity to design a personal
currency and proficiency program in
consultation with an authorized flight
instructor. A flight review may have
certain standard features, e.g., review of
specific regulations and procedures;
however, both the flight review and any
follow-up plan for training and
proficiency may be tailored to each
pilot’s skill, experience, aircraft, and
personal flying goals.2
Section 61.56 sets forth certain
exceptions to the requirement for a pilot
to accomplish a flight review.3 Among
1 There are two exceptions to the minimum time
requirement for a flight review. They are found in
§ 61.56(b) and (f). Paragraph (b) pertains to a
reduction of time required for glider pilots and
paragraph (f) pertains to 1 hour ground training
credited toward a flight review for successful
renewal of a flight instructor certificate under
§ 61.197.
2 Federal Aviation Administration, Conducting an
Effective Flight Review https://www.faa.gov/pilots/
training/media/flight_review.pdf.
3 Paragraphs (d), (e), and (g) of § 61.56 are the
three exceptions to this regulatory requirement to
complete a flight review. The exceptions in
paragraphs (e) and (g) are not subjects of this
rulemaking. Under paragraph (e), a person who has,
within the previous 24 calendar months,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
these exceptions, a person who has,
within the prescribed 24-month period,
‘‘passed a pilot proficiency check
conducted by an FAA examiner, an
approved pilot check airman, or a U.S.
Armed Force, for a pilot certificate,
rating, or operating privilege,’’ need not
accomplish the required flight review
required by § 61.56(d). This exception is
appropriate because a practical test for
a certificate or rating is administered by
an FAA examiner in accordance with
the practical test standards. In addition,
pilots employed by a part 119 certificate
holder conducting operations under part
121 and part 135 receive recurring
training and proficiency checks,
conducted by an FAA examiner or
approved pilot check airman provided
by their employer, which exceed the
requirements of a flight review. As
noted in the regulation above, the FAA
accepts U.S. Armed Forces proficiency
checks. The content of the listed
practical tests and proficiency checks
typically exceeds the requirements of a
flight review and satisfies the stated
objective of the flight review, namely, to
ensure that a pilot has had a qualified
individual comment on his or her
competency at least once every 24
calendar months. Thus, these pilots
need not accomplish the flight review of
§ 61.56(a) as they meet the requirements
of § 61.56(d).
In a recent legal interpretation, the
FAA concluded that a flight instructor
practical test is not included in the
listed exceptions in § 61.56(d) because it
is not a ‘‘pilot proficiency check,’’ Levy
Interpretation, February 7, 2008.4 The
FAA explained that, although a flight
instructor practical test does not
automatically relieve a pilot of the
requirement to complete a flight review,
a person taking a flight instructor
practical test may request that the test
be taken in conjunction with a flight
review at the examiner’s discretion. The
FAA has received several requests to
reconsider the Levy Interpretation and
one request for rulemaking.5
The FAA finds that good cause exists
to amend § 61.56(d) to include
successful completion of flight
instructor practical tests among the
satisfactorily accomplished one or more phases of
an FAA-sponsored pilot proficiency award program
need not accomplish the flight review (14 CFR
61.56(e). Paragraph (g) is an exception regarding a
student pilot and remains as it was previously
written.
4 Legal interpretations can be found on the FAA
Legal Interpretation & Opinion Web site: https://
www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_
offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc200/
Interpretations/.
5 Petition from Robert Hadow, dated April 18,
2011. Docket No. FAA–2011–0437, https://
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56823
exceptions to the flight review
requirement. Applicants for an FAA
flight instructor certificate are required
to have the comprehensive knowledge
and skills necessary to provide
instruction to airmen seeking pilot
certificates and ratings. Part 61 specifies
the areas of operation in which
knowledge and skill must be
demonstrated by the applicant before
the issuance of an FAA flight instructor
certificate with the associated category
and class ratings. All practical tests
administered must meet the knowledge
and skill standard prescribed by the
corresponding Flight Instructor Practical
Test Standards Book published by the
FAA.
Although a flight instructor practical
test is chiefly focused on the pilot’s
instructional skills, a pilot must
demonstrate satisfactory performance of
the procedures and maneuvers selected
by the examiner—at least to the
commercial pilot skill level—while
giving effective instruction.6 Therefore,
the flight instructor practical test
standards require the applicant to
demonstrate not only the knowledge but
also the skill required of pilots
completing the practical tests that the
FAA instructor is authorized to teach.
As with the other exceptions listed in
§ 61.56, the requirements for passing an
FAA flight instructor practical test
exceed those for a pilot accomplishing
a flight review and meet the goal of
ensuring that a pilot’s competency is
observed by a qualified individual.
An FAA flight instructor practical test
places the applicant in the position of
having the examiner evaluate the
applicant as the applicant demonstrates
the procedures and maneuvers
performed in the practical test to
commercial pilot practical test
standards. The flight instructor
applicant also performs and
demonstrates selected phases of flight
during the flight portion of the practical
test. If the pilot taking a flight instructor
practical test does not demonstrate the
safe exercise of the privileges of their
pilot certificate while instructing, the
test would not meet commercial pilot
practical test standards and the
applicant would not pass the flight
instructor practical test.
As previously stated, the flight
instructor practical test standards
require an airman to demonstrate and
simultaneously explain the tasks
required for the issuance of a pilot
certificate while meeting commercial
6 For example, Flight Instructor Practical Test
Standards Book for Airplane, June 2012 (Effective
December 1, 2012), FAA–S–8081–6D U.S.
Department of Transportation (with changes 1 & 2),
Satisfactory Performance No. 6 page 13.
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
56824
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
practical test standards. Industry
advocacy groups have indicated they
believe that the flight instructor
certification covers much more than the
regulatory requirements of a flight
review. These groups have indicated
support for amendment of the
regulations to allow for a flight
instructor practical test to be included
as an exception to completing a flight
review. The FAA agrees with this view.
This rule modifies § 61.56(d) to allow an
airman who passes a practical test for
issuance of a flight instructor certificate,
a practical test for the addition of a
rating to a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for renewal of a flight
instructor certificate, or a practical test
for the reinstatement of a flight
instructor certificate to meet the flight
review requirements of 14 CFR part 61.
Recent Flight Experience
Section 61.57 sets forth the recent
flight experience requirements to act as
pilot in command of an aircraft. Section
61.57(e)(2) states that this section does
not apply ‘‘to a pilot in command who
is employed by an air carrier certificated
under part 121 or 135 and is engaged in
a flight operation under part 91, 121, or
135 for that air carrier if the pilot is in
compliance with’’ the pilot-in-command
requirements in § 121.435 or § 121.436,
as applicable, and § 121.439 or
§§ 135.243 and 135.247, as appropriate.
The FAA has received several requests
for clarification of whether, under the
specific language of § 61.57(e)(2), the
exception applies only to a pilot in
command employed by the holder of a
part 119 air carrier certificate or whether
it also extends to a pilot in command
employed by the holder of a part 119
operating certificate.
When the FAA first proposed this
exception to the recent flight experience
requirements in § 61.57, it stated that
the intention was to provide relief from
‘‘essentially redundant recency
requirements’’ for part 121 and part 135
operators and their pilots in command
(59 FR 56385, November 14, 1994). In
that final rule, then-§ 61.57(f) stated that
the recent flight experience
requirements in part 61 did not apply
‘‘to a pilot in command, employed by a
14 CFR part 121 or part 135 operator,
engaged in flight operations under 14
CFR part 91, 121, or 135 for that
operator.’’ The FAA refined the
language in a 1997 final rule and, in
doing so, introduced the term ‘‘air
carrier’’ in place of the term ‘‘operator’’
(62 FR 16220, April 7, 1997).
The FAA did not intend to limit the
exception to pilots employed by air
carriers operating in parts 121 and 135.
The FAA intended to include any pilot
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
in command who is employed by a part
119 certificate holder authorized to
conduct operations under part 121 or
part 135 when the pilot is engaged in
operations under parts 91, 121, or 135
for that certificate holder if the pilot in
command is in compliance with
§§ 121.435 or 121.436, as applicable,
and § 121.439 or §§ 135.243 and
135.247, as appropriate.
Consequently, the FAA finds that
good cause exists to amend the language
in § 61.57(e) to make clear that the
recent flight experience requirements of
that section do not apply to a pilot in
command who is employed by the
holder of an operating certificate that is
conducting operations under part 121 or
part 135 if the pilot in command is also
in compliance with § 121.435 or
§ 121.436, as applicable, and § 121.439,
or §§ 135.243 and 135.247, as
appropriate. In making this change, the
FAA is acting consistently with the
original intent of the regulation—
specifically, providing relief from
redundant recency requirements.7
Airmen Online Services
In the case of a lost or destroyed
airman or medical certificate, § 61.29(a)
and (b) permit a pilot to request the
replacement of a lost or destroyed
airman certificate issued under part 61.
Replacement airman certificates may be
requested by letter to the Department of
Transportation, FAA, Airmen
Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082,
Oklahoma City, OK 73124. Replacement
medical certificates may be requested by
letter to the Department of
Transportation, FAA, Aerospace
Medical Certification Division, P.O. Box
26200, Oklahoma City, OK 73125.
Although current regulations
recognize requests for replacement
certificates only by letter, the FAA has
established Airmen Online Services
through which a pilot can request a
replacement airman certificate or obtain
a document that provides temporary
authority to exercise the privileges of an
airman certificate by facsimile or
through Internet download at the FAA
Web site: https://www.faa.gov/licenses_
certificates/airmen_certification/
certificate_replacement/. The use of
Airmen Online Services is not
addressed or recognized in § 61.29.
Therefore, the FAA is amending the
language in § 61.29 to reflect the use of
Airmen Online Services or any method
7 The FAA has modified the language in
§ 61.57(e)(1) pertaining to pilots in command
employed by part 119 certificate holders conducting
operations under part 125. The revision of
paragraph (e)(1) results in no substantive change to
the requirements for part 119 certificate holders
conducting operations under part 125.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
acceptable to the FAA for the purpose
of obtaining a replacement certificate or
60-day authority to exercise the
privileges of a lost or stolen certificate.
The FAA is also revising § 61.3 to
clarify that temporary documents issued
under § 61.29(e) are acceptable for
meeting the § 61.3 requirement that a
pilot have his or her pilot certificate and
medical certificate in the person’s
physical possession when serving as a
required flightcrew member. The FAA
notes that § 61.29(e) already contains
language indicating that temporary
documents may be carried ‘‘as an
airman certificate [or] medical
certificate’’ for up to 60 days. As such,
the language being added to § 61.3 is not
intended as a change to existing
regulations but rather is intended solely
to provide ease of reference for persons
seeking such information in § 61.3. The
FAA notes that online services are
currently unavailable for replacement
medical certificates and knowledge test
reports; however, the FAA has modified
the language of those provisions in
anticipation of other methods becoming
available in the future.
II. Regulatory Analyses and Executive
Order Determinations
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 direct that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Public Law 96–39) prohibits
agencies from setting standards that
create unnecessary obstacles to the
foreign commerce of the United States.
In developing U.S. standards, the Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this direct final
rule.
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Department of Transportation Order
DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and
procedures for simplification, analysis,
and review of regulations. If the
expected cost impact is so minimal that
a final rule does not warrant a full
evaluation, this order permits that a
statement to that effect and the basis for
it be included in the preamble if a full
regulatory evaluation of the cost and
benefits is not prepared. Such a
determination has been made for this
direct final rule. The reasoning for this
determination follows.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This direct final rule relieves
regulatory burdens for certified flight
instructor applicants and pilots in
command. It also makes clear that
applications for replacement airman and
medical certificates may be obtained
using methods other than individual
letters mailed to the Airmen
Certification Branch or Aerospace
Medical Certification Division,
respectively.
Since the direct final rule will impose
no new costs, and updates four sections
of part 61, the expected outcome will be
a minimal impact with positive net
benefits. A regulatory evaluation was
not prepared.
The FAA, therefore, has determined
that this direct final rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Therefore, this action has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget. Further, this
direct final rule is not ‘‘significant’’ as
defined in DOT’s Regulatory Policies
and Procedures.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA) establishes ‘‘as a principle of
regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives
of the rule and of applicable statutes, to
fit regulatory and informational
requirements to the scale of the
businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
This rule relieves regulatory
restrictions for certified flight instructor
applicants and pilots in command. It
also makes clear that applications for
replacement airmen and medical
certificates may be obtained using
methods other than individual letters
mailed to the Airmen Certification
Branch or Aerospace Medical
Certification Division, respectively.
Small businesses and small entities are
not impacted by this action.
This direct final rule imposes no new
costs and updates and clarifies four
sections of part 61; the expected
outcome will have only a minimal
impact on any small entity affected by
this rulemaking action.
Therefore, as the FAA Administrator,
I certify that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub.
L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies
from establishing standards or engaging
in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to these Acts, the
establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to
the foreign commerce of the United
States, so long as the standard has a
legitimate domestic objective, such as
the protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed
the potential effect of this direct final
rule and determined that it will have
only a domestic impact and therefore no
effect on international trade.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56825
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$143.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
This direct final rule does not contain
such a mandate; therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Act do not
apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
FAA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public.
According to the 1995 amendments to
the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR
1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an agency may not
collect or sponsor the collection of
information, nor may it impose an
information collection requirement
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
This action contains the following
revision to the existing information
collection requirements previously
approved under OMB Control Number
2120–0021, Certification: Pilots, Flight
Instructors, and Ground Instructors. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the FAA has
submitted this information collection
revision to the Office of Management
and Budget for its review.
This direct final rule reduces the
recordkeeping burden for an airman
who passes a practical test for issuance
of a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for the addition of a rating
to a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for renewal of a flight
instructor certificate, or a practical test
for the reinstatement of a flight
instructor certificate as this rule will
now allow passage of such a test to meet
the 24-calendar month flight review
requirements for the airman. This rule
also relieves regulatory burdens for
airmen by making clear that the recent
flight experience requirements do not
apply to a pilot in command who is
employed by an operator certificated
under 14 CFR part 135 if the pilot in
command is also in compliance with the
pilot in command qualifications and
recent experience requirements of part
135.
Flight reviews: The current
information collection estimates that, of
the total active pilot population of
700,000, some 190,000 pilots complete
a flight review per year with an average
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
56826
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
time of 0.1 hours each (6 minutes)
necessary for the flight instructor to
record the flight review. This rule
reduces that recordkeeping burden by
permitting an airman who passes a
practical test for issuance of a flight
instructor certificate, a practical test for
the addition of a rating to a flight
instructor certificate, a practical test for
renewal of a flight instructor certificate,
or a practical test for the reinstatement
of a flight instructor certificate to meet
the flight review requirements.
During calendar year 2012, the FAA
issued 4,127 original certified flight
instructor certificates and 4,034 8
certified flight instructor certificates for
the addition of a rating. These persons
will no longer be required to complete
the flight review. Thus, the FAA
estimates that 8,161 airmen annually
will no longer be required to complete
flight reviews because they passed a
practical test for issuance of a flight
instructor certificate, a practical test for
the addition of a rating to a flight
instructor certificate, a practical test for
renewal of a flight instructor certificate,
or a practical test for the reinstatement
of a flight instructor certificate.
Therefore, the FAA estimates that this
rule will reduce the burden by 816.1
hours annually.
Recent flight experience: The current
information collection estimates that
290,000 pilots are subject to these
recordkeeping requirements at an
average of 0.1 hours (6 minutes) each.
While this rule clarifies that the recent
flight experience requirements do not
apply to a pilot in command who is
employed by the holder of a part 119
operating certificate that authorizes
operations under 14 CFR part 135 if the
pilot in command is also in compliance
with the pilot in command
qualifications and recent experience
requirements of part 135, the FAA does
not believe that the burden related to
this information collection will change
in a manner that is quantifiable. Based
on the information received from the
industry, the FAA believes that part 119
certificate holders have been
interpreting the regulations to permit
pilots who complete the recency
requirements under part 135 to use this
provision regardless of whether they are
employed by a certificate holder that
holds an air carrier certificate or an
operating certificate. While a small
number of persons may benefit from this
regulatory change, the FAA believes that
those numbers are small as most part
119 certificate holders have already
been operating in a manner similar to
the regulations being revised and
clarified by this rule. Therefore, the
FAA is not revising the burden
associated with the recent flight
experience element of this information
collection.
Based on the change made by this
direct final rule to the information
collection related to certified flight
instructor flight reviews, the
recordkeeping requirements associated
with 14 CFR 61.56 are reduced from
19,000 annual burden hours to 18,184
annual burden hours, reflecting the
reduction in number of annual
responses for this aspect of the
information collection from 190,000
responses to 181,839 responses.
Information Collection 2120–0021:
Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors,
and Ground Instructors
Type of information collection:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
Form(s): FAA form 8710–1.
Frequency: The information is
collected on occasion.
Abstract: 14 CFR Part 61 prescribes
certification standards for pilots, flight
instructors, and ground instructors. The
information collected is used to
determine compliance with applicant
eligibility, via FAA form 8710–1.
The following table provides
information regarding annual responses
and annual burden hours.
Average time
per response
(hours)
Number of
responses
Provision CFR §
Total annual
burden hours
Reporting
61.13 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.197 ........................................................................................................................................
100,000
40,000
0.1
0.1
10,000
4,000
61.39 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.49 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.51 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.56(a) ......................................................................................................................................
61.57 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.87 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.93 ..........................................................................................................................................
61.125 ........................................................................................................................................
61.185 ........................................................................................................................................
61.189 ........................................................................................................................................
100,000
13,600
190,000
181,839
290,000
80,000
80,000
9,500
5,800
30,000
0.05
0.05
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.1
1.0
5,000
680
190,000
18,184
29,000
4,000
8,000
1,900
580
30,000
Total ....................................................................................................................................
1,120,739
..........................
301,344
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Recordkeeping
The agency is soliciting comments
to—
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of collecting
information on those who are to
8 This number reflects practical tests for an
additional rating to a flight instructor certificate, for
renewal of a flight instructor certificate, and for
reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
respond, including by using appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Individuals and organizations may
send comments on the information
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
collection requirement to the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section at the
beginning of this preamble by October
16, 2013. Comments also should be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk
Officer for FAA, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10202, 725 17th Street
NW., Washington, DC 20503.
International Compatibility and
Cooperation
In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to
conform to International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the
maximum extent practicable. The FAA
has reviewed the corresponding ICAO
Standards and Recommended Practices
and has identified no differences with
these regulations.
Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation
Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation,
(77 FR 26413, May 4, 2012) promotes
international regulatory cooperation to
meet shared challenges involving
health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to
reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed
this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive
Order 13609, and has determined that
this action would have no effect on
international regulatory cooperation.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in
paragraph 312f and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
Administrative Procedure Act
An agency may find good cause to
exempt a rule from certain provisions of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 553), including notice of
proposed rulemaking and the
opportunity for public comment, if it is
determined to be unnecessary,
impracticable, or contrary to the public
interest. This rule relieves regulatory
restrictions by permitting an airman
who passes a practical test for issuance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
of a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for the addition of a rating
to a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for renewal of a flight
instructor certificate, or a practical test
for the reinstatement of a flight
instructor certificate to meet the 24calendar month flight review
requirements of part 61. This rule also
clarifies that the recent flight experience
requirements of § 61.57 do not apply to
a pilot in command who is employed by
an operator certificated under 14 CFR
part 135 if the pilot in command is in
compliance with the pilot in command
qualifications and recent experience
requirements of part 135. Finally, this
rule permits replacement airmen and
medical certificates to be requested
online, or by any other method
acceptable to the Administrator.
Therefore, the FAA finds good cause to
publish this action as a direct final rule.
Please see the ‘‘Direct Final Rule
Procedure’’ section for more
information.
Executive Order 13132
The FAA has analyzed this final rule
under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The
agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, or the relationship
between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, and,
therefore, does not have Federalism
implications.
Executive Order 13211, Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this final rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The
agency has determined that it is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under the
executive order, and it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
III. Additional Information
A. Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The agency also invites
comments relating to the economic,
environmental, energy, or federalism
impacts that might result from adopting
the rulemaking action in this document.
The most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the rulemaking
action, explain the reason for any
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56827
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments it receives, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this rulemaking. Before confirming this
direct final rule, the FAA will consider
all comments it receives on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The agency may
change this rulemaking action in light of
the comments it receives.
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information: Do not file proprietary or
confidential business information in the
docket. Such information must be sent
or delivered directly to the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document, and marked as proprietary or
confidential. If submitting information
on a disk or CD–ROM, mark the outside
of the disk or CD–ROM, and identify
electronically within the disk or CD–
ROM the specific information that is
proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), if the FAA is
aware of proprietary information filed
with a comment, the agency does not
place it in the docket. It is held in a
separate file to which the public does
not have access, and the FAA places a
note in the docket that it has received
it. If the FAA receives a request to
examine or copy this information, it
treats it as any other request under the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552). The FAA processes such a request
under Department of Transportation
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
B. Availability of Rulemaking
Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking
documents may be obtained from the
Internet by—
• Searching the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
• Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
• Accessing the Government Printing
Office’s Federal Digital System Web
page at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of
Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or
by calling (202) 267–9680. Commenters
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
56828
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
must identify the docket or amendment
number of this rulemaking.
All documents the FAA considered in
developing this rulemaking action,
including economic analyses and
technical reports, may be accessed from
the Internet through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal referenced above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 61
Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Teachers.
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends chapter I of title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 61—CERTIFICATION: PILOTS,
FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND
INSTRUCTORS
§ 61.29 Replacement of a lost or destroyed
airman or medical certificate or knowledge
test report.
1. The authority citation for part 61
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701–44703, 44707, 44709–44711, 45102–
45103, 45301–45302.
2. Section 61.3 is amended by revising
paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1),
(b), and (i)(1) to read as follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 61.3 Requirement for certificates,
ratings, and authorizations.
(a) Required pilot certificate for
operating a civil aircraft of the United
States. No person may serve as a
required pilot flight crewmember of a
civil aircraft of the United States, unless
that person:
(1) Has in the person’s physical
possession or readily accessible in the
aircraft when exercising the privileges
of that pilot certificate or
authorization—
(i) A pilot certificate issued under this
part and in accordance with § 61.19;
(ii) A special purpose pilot
authorization issued under § 61.77;
(iii) A temporary certificate issued
under § 61.17;
(iv) A document conveying temporary
authority to exercise certificate
privileges issued by the Airmen
Certification Branch under § 61.29(e); or
(v) When operating an aircraft within
a foreign country, a pilot license issued
by that country may be used.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Required pilot certificate for
operating a foreign-registered aircraft
within the United States. No person may
serve as a required pilot flight
crewmember of a civil aircraft of foreign
registry within the United States,
unless—
(1) That person’s pilot certificate or
document issued under § 61.29(e) is in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
that person’s physical possession or
readily accessible in the aircraft when
exercising the privileges of that pilot
certificate; and
(2) Has been issued in accordance
with this part, or has been issued or
validated by the country in which the
aircraft is registered.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Ground instructor certificate. (1)
Each person who holds a ground
instructor certificate issued under this
part must have that certificate or a
temporary document issued under
§ 61.29(e) in that person’s physical
possession or immediately accessible
when exercising the privileges of that
certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 61.29 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (e)
to read as follows:
(a) A request for the replacement of a
lost or destroyed airman certificate
issued under this part must be made:
(1) By letter to the Department of
Transportation, FAA, Airmen
Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082,
Oklahoma City, OK 73125, and must be
accompanied by a check or money order
for the appropriate fee payable to the
FAA; or
(2) In any other manner and form
approved by the Administrator
including a request online to Airmen
Services at https://www.faa.gov, and
must be accompanied by acceptable
form of payment for the appropriate fee.
(b) A request for the replacement of a
lost or destroyed medical certificate
must be made:
(1) By letter to the Department of
Transportation, FAA, Aerospace
Medical Certification Division, P.O. Box
26200, Oklahoma City, OK 73125, and
must be accompanied by a check or
money order for the appropriate fee
payable to the FAA; or
(2) In any other manner and form
approved by the Administrator and
must be accompanied by acceptable
form of payment for the appropriate fee.
(c) A request for the replacement of a
lost or destroyed knowledge test report
must be made:
(1) By letter to the Department of
Transportation, FAA, Airmen
Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082,
Oklahoma City, OK 73125, and must be
accompanied by a check or money order
for the appropriate fee payable to the
FAA; or
(2) In any other manner and form
approved by the Administrator and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
must be accompanied by acceptable
form of payment for the appropriate fee.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) A person who has lost an airman
certificate, medical certificate, or
knowledge test report may obtain, in a
form or manner approved by the
Administrator, a document conveying
temporary authority to exercise
certificate privileges from the FAA
Aeromedical Certification Branch or the
Airman Certification Branch, as
appropriate, and the:
(1) Document may be carried as an
airman certificate, medical certificate, or
knowledge test report, as appropriate,
for up to 60 days pending the person’s
receipt of a duplicate under paragraph
(a), (b), or (c) of this section, unless the
person has been notified that the
certificate has been suspended or
revoked.
(2) Request for such a document must
include the date on which a duplicate
certificate or knowledge test report was
previously requested.
■ 4. Section 61.56 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 61.56
Flight review.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A person who has, within the
period specified in paragraph (c) of this
section, passed any of the following
need not accomplish the flight review
required by this section:
(1) A pilot proficiency check or
practical test conducted by an examiner,
an approved pilot check airman, or a
U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate,
rating, or operating privilege.
(2) A practical test conducted by an
examiner for the issuance of a flight
instructor certificate, an additional
rating on a flight instructor certificate,
renewal of a flight instructor certificate,
or reinstatement of a flight instructor
certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 61.57 is amended by—
■ A. Revising paragraphs (e)(1) and
(e)(2),
■ B. Redesignating paragraph (e)(3) as
paragraph (e)(4) and revising the
introductory text of newly redesignated
paragraph (e)(4), and
■ C. Adding new paragraph (e)(3) to
read as follows:
§ 61.57 Recent flight experience: Pilot in
command.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Exceptions. (1) Paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this section do not apply to a pilot
in command who is employed by a part
119 certificate holder authorized to
conduct operations under part 125
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 179 / Monday, September 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
when the pilot is engaged in a flight
operation for that certificate holder if
the pilot in command is in compliance
with §§ 125.281 and 125.285 of this
chapter.
(2) This section does not apply to a
pilot in command who is employed by
a part 119 certificate holder authorized
to conduct operations under part 121
when the pilot is engaged in a flight
operation under parts 91 and 121 for
that certificate holder if the pilot in
command is in compliance with
§§ 121.435 or 121.436, as applicable,
and § 121.439 of this chapter.
(3) This section does not apply to a
pilot in command who is employed by
a part 119 certificate holder authorized
to conduct operations under part 135
when the pilot is engaged in a flight
operation under parts 91 and 135 for
that certificate holder if the pilot in
command is in compliance with
§§ 135.243 and 135.247 of this chapter.
(4) Paragraph (b) of this section does
not apply to a pilot in command of a
turbine-powered airplane that is type
certificated for more than one pilot
crewmember, provided that pilot has
complied with the requirements of
paragraph (e)(4)(i) or (ii) of this section:
*
*
*
*
*
Issued under authority provided by 49
U.S.C. 106(f), 44701(a), and 44703, in
Washington, DC, on August 27, 2013.
Michael P. Huerta,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–22485 Filed 9–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 97
[Docket No. 30919; Amdt. No. 3554]
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures;
Miscellaneous Amendments
This rule establishes, amends,
suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are
needed because of the adoption of new
or revised criteria, or because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Sep 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
This rule is effective September
16, 2013. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of September
16, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Availability of matter
incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
For Examination—
1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA
Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591;
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located;
3. The National Flight Procedures
Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd.,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
4. The National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Availability—All SIAPs are available
online free of charge. Visit nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual
SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from:
1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA–
200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; or
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
new navigational facilities, adding new
obstacles, or changing air traffic
requirements. These changes are
designed to provide safe and efficient
use of the navigable airspace and to
promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected
airports.
Richard A. Dunham III, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS–420) Flight
Technologies and Programs Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City,
OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125),
telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by
amending the referenced SIAPs. The
complete regulatory description of each
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56829
SIAP is listed on the appropriate FAA
Form 8260, as modified by the National
Flight Data Center (FDC)/Permanent
Notice to Airmen (P–NOTAM), and is
incorporated by reference in the
amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1
CFR part 51, and § 97.20 of Title 14 of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
The large number of SIAPs, their
complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim
publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further,
airmen do not use the regulatory text of
the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic
depiction on charts printed by
publishers of aeronautical materials.
Thus, the advantages of incorporation
by reference are realized and
publication of the complete description
of each SIAP contained in FAA form
documents is unnecessary. This
amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAP
and the corresponding effective dates.
This amendment also identifies the
airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is
effective upon publication of each
separate SIAP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of
change considerations, this amendment
incorporates only specific changes
contained for each SIAP as modified by
FDC/P–NOTAMs.
The SIAPs, as modified by FDC
P–NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied
only to specific conditions existing at
the affected airports. All SIAP
amendments in this rule have been
previously issued by the FAA in a FDC
NOTAM as an emergency action of
immediate flight safety relating directly
to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need
for all these SIAP amendments requires
making them effective in less than 30
days.
Because of the close and immediate
relationship between these SIAPs and
safety in air commerce, I find that notice
and public procedure before adopting
these SIAPs are impracticable and
contrary to the public interest and,
where applicable, that good cause exists
for making these SIAPs effective in less
than 30 days.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56822-56829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22485]
[[Page 56822]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 61
[Docket No.: FAA-2013-0780; Amdt. No. 61-131]
RIN 2120-AK23
Certified Flight Instructor Flight Reviews; Recent Pilot in
Command Experience; Airmen Online Services
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule permits an airman who passes a practical test for
issuance of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for the
addition of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a practical
test for renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a practical
test for the reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate to meet
the 24-calendar month flight review requirements. This rule also
clarifies that the generally applicable recent flight experience
requirements do not apply to a pilot in command who is employed by a
commuter or on-demand operator if the pilot in command is in compliance
with the specific pilot in command qualifications and recent experience
requirements for that commuter or on-demand operator. Finally, this
rule permits replacement airman and medical certificates to be
requested online, or by any other method acceptable to the
Administrator. These changes relieve regulatory burdens and clarify
existing regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 15, 2013.
Submit comments on or before October 16, 2013. If the FAA receives
an adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse comment, the
FAA will advise the public by publishing a document in the Federal
Register before the effective date of this direct final rule. This
document may withdraw the direct final rule in whole or in part.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-
0780 using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at (202) 493-2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
https://www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this action, contact Allan G. Kash, Airmen Certification and Training
Branch, Flight Standards Service, AFS-810, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 385-9621; email allan.g.kash@faa.gov.
For legal questions concerning this action, contact Anne Moore,
Office of the Chief Counsel--International Law, Legislation, and
Regulations Division, AGC-200, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-
3123; email anne.moore@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 447--Safety Regulation.
Under that section, the FAA is charged with promoting safe flight of
civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations necessary for
safety and prescribing regulations for the issuance of airman
certificates. This final rule is within the scope of that authority.
The Direct Final Rule Procedure
The FAA is adopting this rule without prior notice and prior public
comment as a direct final rule because it alleviates unnecessary
burdens by expanding the exceptions to a flight review, removes
redundant recency requirements for pilots flying for certificated
operators under part 135, and provides a regulatory basis for the
Airmen Certification Branch to provide Airmen Online Services. The
Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation
(DOT) (44 FR 1134, February 26, 1979) provide that, to the maximum
extent possible, operating administrations for the DOT should provide
an opportunity for public comment on regulations issued without prior
notice. Accordingly, the FAA invites interested persons to participate
in this rulemaking by filing comments, data, or views. The agency also
invites comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result from adopting this final rule.
This direct final rule will take effect on November 15, 2013 unless
the FAA receives an adverse comment or a notice of intent to file an
adverse comment within the comment period. An adverse comment explains
why a rule would be inappropriate, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. It may challenge the rule's underlying
premise or approach. Under the direct final rule process, the FAA does
not consider the following types of comments to be adverse:
A comment recommending another rule change, in addition to
the change in the direct final rule at issue. The FAA considers the
comment adverse, however, if the commenter states why the direct final
rule would be ineffective without the change.
A frivolous or insubstantial comment.
If the FAA receives an adverse comment or notice of intent to file
an adverse comment, the FAA will advise the public by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before the effective date of the final
rule. This document may withdraw the direct final rule in whole or in
part. If the FAA withdraws a direct final rule because of an adverse
comment, the FAA may incorporate the commenter's recommendation into
another direct final rule or may publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking.
If the FAA does not receive an adverse comment or notice of intent
to file an adverse comment, the FAA will publish a confirmation
document in the Federal Register, generally within 15 days after the
comment period closes.
[[Page 56823]]
The confirmation document confirms to the public the effective date of
the rule.
See the ``Additional Information'' section for information on how
to comment on this direct final rule and how the FAA will handle
comments received. The ``Additional Information'' section also contains
related information about the docket, privacy, and the handling of
proprietary or confidential business information. In addition, there is
information on obtaining copies of related rulemaking documents.
I. Discussion of the Direct Final Rule
Flight Review
To act as pilot in command of an aircraft, Sec. 61.56(c) of Title
14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) requires a pilot to have
satisfactorily completed a flight review in an aircraft for which that
pilot is rated within 24 calendar months before the month in which the
pilot acts as pilot in command. The flight review must consist of a
minimum of 1 hour flight training and 1 hour ground training.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are two exceptions to the minimum time requirement for
a flight review. They are found in Sec. 61.56(b) and (f). Paragraph
(b) pertains to a reduction of time required for glider pilots and
paragraph (f) pertains to 1 hour ground training credited toward a
flight review for successful renewal of a flight instructor
certificate under Sec. 61.197.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the flight review is to provide for a regular
assessment of pilot skills and aeronautical knowledge. When the
requirement was first introduced, the FAA stated that the flight review
would assure that every pilot would have a qualified individual comment
on his or her competency at least once every two years, as discussed in
38 FR 3156 (February 1, 1973). The flight review also offers pilots the
opportunity to design a personal currency and proficiency program in
consultation with an authorized flight instructor. A flight review may
have certain standard features, e.g., review of specific regulations
and procedures; however, both the flight review and any follow-up plan
for training and proficiency may be tailored to each pilot's skill,
experience, aircraft, and personal flying goals.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Federal Aviation Administration, Conducting an Effective
Flight Review https://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/media/flight_review.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 61.56 sets forth certain exceptions to the requirement for
a pilot to accomplish a flight review.\3\ Among these exceptions, a
person who has, within the prescribed 24-month period, ``passed a pilot
proficiency check conducted by an FAA examiner, an approved pilot check
airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or
operating privilege,'' need not accomplish the required flight review
required by Sec. 61.56(d). This exception is appropriate because a
practical test for a certificate or rating is administered by an FAA
examiner in accordance with the practical test standards. In addition,
pilots employed by a part 119 certificate holder conducting operations
under part 121 and part 135 receive recurring training and proficiency
checks, conducted by an FAA examiner or approved pilot check airman
provided by their employer, which exceed the requirements of a flight
review. As noted in the regulation above, the FAA accepts U.S. Armed
Forces proficiency checks. The content of the listed practical tests
and proficiency checks typically exceeds the requirements of a flight
review and satisfies the stated objective of the flight review, namely,
to ensure that a pilot has had a qualified individual comment on his or
her competency at least once every 24 calendar months. Thus, these
pilots need not accomplish the flight review of Sec. 61.56(a) as they
meet the requirements of Sec. 61.56(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Paragraphs (d), (e), and (g) of Sec. 61.56 are the three
exceptions to this regulatory requirement to complete a flight
review. The exceptions in paragraphs (e) and (g) are not subjects of
this rulemaking. Under paragraph (e), a person who has, within the
previous 24 calendar months, satisfactorily accomplished one or more
phases of an FAA-sponsored pilot proficiency award program need not
accomplish the flight review (14 CFR 61.56(e). Paragraph (g) is an
exception regarding a student pilot and remains as it was previously
written.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a recent legal interpretation, the FAA concluded that a flight
instructor practical test is not included in the listed exceptions in
Sec. 61.56(d) because it is not a ``pilot proficiency check,'' Levy
Interpretation, February 7, 2008.\4\ The FAA explained that, although a
flight instructor practical test does not automatically relieve a pilot
of the requirement to complete a flight review, a person taking a
flight instructor practical test may request that the test be taken in
conjunction with a flight review at the examiner's discretion. The FAA
has received several requests to reconsider the Levy Interpretation and
one request for rulemaking.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Legal interpretations can be found on the FAA Legal
Interpretation & Opinion Web site: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc200/Interpretations/.
\5\ Petition from Robert Hadow, dated April 18, 2011. Docket No.
FAA-2011-0437, https://www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA finds that good cause exists to amend Sec. 61.56(d) to
include successful completion of flight instructor practical tests
among the exceptions to the flight review requirement. Applicants for
an FAA flight instructor certificate are required to have the
comprehensive knowledge and skills necessary to provide instruction to
airmen seeking pilot certificates and ratings. Part 61 specifies the
areas of operation in which knowledge and skill must be demonstrated by
the applicant before the issuance of an FAA flight instructor
certificate with the associated category and class ratings. All
practical tests administered must meet the knowledge and skill standard
prescribed by the corresponding Flight Instructor Practical Test
Standards Book published by the FAA.
Although a flight instructor practical test is chiefly focused on
the pilot's instructional skills, a pilot must demonstrate satisfactory
performance of the procedures and maneuvers selected by the examiner--
at least to the commercial pilot skill level--while giving effective
instruction.\6\ Therefore, the flight instructor practical test
standards require the applicant to demonstrate not only the knowledge
but also the skill required of pilots completing the practical tests
that the FAA instructor is authorized to teach. As with the other
exceptions listed in Sec. 61.56, the requirements for passing an FAA
flight instructor practical test exceed those for a pilot accomplishing
a flight review and meet the goal of ensuring that a pilot's competency
is observed by a qualified individual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For example, Flight Instructor Practical Test Standards Book
for Airplane, June 2012 (Effective December 1, 2012), FAA-S-8081-6D
U.S. Department of Transportation (with changes 1 & 2), Satisfactory
Performance No. 6 page 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An FAA flight instructor practical test places the applicant in the
position of having the examiner evaluate the applicant as the applicant
demonstrates the procedures and maneuvers performed in the practical
test to commercial pilot practical test standards. The flight
instructor applicant also performs and demonstrates selected phases of
flight during the flight portion of the practical test. If the pilot
taking a flight instructor practical test does not demonstrate the safe
exercise of the privileges of their pilot certificate while
instructing, the test would not meet commercial pilot practical test
standards and the applicant would not pass the flight instructor
practical test.
As previously stated, the flight instructor practical test
standards require an airman to demonstrate and simultaneously explain
the tasks required for the issuance of a pilot certificate while
meeting commercial
[[Page 56824]]
practical test standards. Industry advocacy groups have indicated they
believe that the flight instructor certification covers much more than
the regulatory requirements of a flight review. These groups have
indicated support for amendment of the regulations to allow for a
flight instructor practical test to be included as an exception to
completing a flight review. The FAA agrees with this view. This rule
modifies Sec. 61.56(d) to allow an airman who passes a practical test
for issuance of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for
the addition of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a
practical test for renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a
practical test for the reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate
to meet the flight review requirements of 14 CFR part 61.
Recent Flight Experience
Section 61.57 sets forth the recent flight experience requirements
to act as pilot in command of an aircraft. Section 61.57(e)(2) states
that this section does not apply ``to a pilot in command who is
employed by an air carrier certificated under part 121 or 135 and is
engaged in a flight operation under part 91, 121, or 135 for that air
carrier if the pilot is in compliance with'' the pilot-in-command
requirements in Sec. 121.435 or Sec. 121.436, as applicable, and
Sec. 121.439 or Sec. Sec. 135.243 and 135.247, as appropriate. The
FAA has received several requests for clarification of whether, under
the specific language of Sec. 61.57(e)(2), the exception applies only
to a pilot in command employed by the holder of a part 119 air carrier
certificate or whether it also extends to a pilot in command employed
by the holder of a part 119 operating certificate.
When the FAA first proposed this exception to the recent flight
experience requirements in Sec. 61.57, it stated that the intention
was to provide relief from ``essentially redundant recency
requirements'' for part 121 and part 135 operators and their pilots in
command (59 FR 56385, November 14, 1994). In that final rule, then-
Sec. 61.57(f) stated that the recent flight experience requirements in
part 61 did not apply ``to a pilot in command, employed by a 14 CFR
part 121 or part 135 operator, engaged in flight operations under 14
CFR part 91, 121, or 135 for that operator.'' The FAA refined the
language in a 1997 final rule and, in doing so, introduced the term
``air carrier'' in place of the term ``operator'' (62 FR 16220, April
7, 1997).
The FAA did not intend to limit the exception to pilots employed by
air carriers operating in parts 121 and 135. The FAA intended to
include any pilot in command who is employed by a part 119 certificate
holder authorized to conduct operations under part 121 or part 135 when
the pilot is engaged in operations under parts 91, 121, or 135 for that
certificate holder if the pilot in command is in compliance with
Sec. Sec. 121.435 or 121.436, as applicable, and Sec. 121.439 or
Sec. Sec. 135.243 and 135.247, as appropriate.
Consequently, the FAA finds that good cause exists to amend the
language in Sec. 61.57(e) to make clear that the recent flight
experience requirements of that section do not apply to a pilot in
command who is employed by the holder of an operating certificate that
is conducting operations under part 121 or part 135 if the pilot in
command is also in compliance with Sec. 121.435 or Sec. 121.436, as
applicable, and Sec. 121.439, or Sec. Sec. 135.243 and 135.247, as
appropriate. In making this change, the FAA is acting consistently with
the original intent of the regulation--specifically, providing relief
from redundant recency requirements.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The FAA has modified the language in Sec. 61.57(e)(1)
pertaining to pilots in command employed by part 119 certificate
holders conducting operations under part 125. The revision of
paragraph (e)(1) results in no substantive change to the
requirements for part 119 certificate holders conducting operations
under part 125.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airmen Online Services
In the case of a lost or destroyed airman or medical certificate,
Sec. 61.29(a) and (b) permit a pilot to request the replacement of a
lost or destroyed airman certificate issued under part 61. Replacement
airman certificates may be requested by letter to the Department of
Transportation, FAA, Airmen Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082,
Oklahoma City, OK 73124. Replacement medical certificates may be
requested by letter to the Department of Transportation, FAA, Aerospace
Medical Certification Division, P.O. Box 26200, Oklahoma City, OK
73125.
Although current regulations recognize requests for replacement
certificates only by letter, the FAA has established Airmen Online
Services through which a pilot can request a replacement airman
certificate or obtain a document that provides temporary authority to
exercise the privileges of an airman certificate by facsimile or
through Internet download at the FAA Web site: https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/certificate_replacement/.
The use of Airmen Online Services is not addressed or recognized in
Sec. 61.29. Therefore, the FAA is amending the language in Sec. 61.29
to reflect the use of Airmen Online Services or any method acceptable
to the FAA for the purpose of obtaining a replacement certificate or
60-day authority to exercise the privileges of a lost or stolen
certificate.
The FAA is also revising Sec. 61.3 to clarify that temporary
documents issued under Sec. 61.29(e) are acceptable for meeting the
Sec. 61.3 requirement that a pilot have his or her pilot certificate
and medical certificate in the person's physical possession when
serving as a required flightcrew member. The FAA notes that Sec.
61.29(e) already contains language indicating that temporary documents
may be carried ``as an airman certificate [or] medical certificate''
for up to 60 days. As such, the language being added to Sec. 61.3 is
not intended as a change to existing regulations but rather is intended
solely to provide ease of reference for persons seeking such
information in Sec. 61.3. The FAA notes that online services are
currently unavailable for replacement medical certificates and
knowledge test reports; however, the FAA has modified the language of
those provisions in anticipation of other methods becoming available in
the future.
II. Regulatory Analyses and Executive Order Determinations
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 direct
that each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon
a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation
justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub.
L. 96-354) requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of
regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act
(Public Law 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting standards that
create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. In developing U.S. standards, the Trade Act requires agencies
to consider international standards and, where appropriate, that they
be the basis of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written
assessment of the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or
final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995). This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA's analysis of the economic impacts of this direct
final rule.
[[Page 56825]]
Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies
and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations.
If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a final rule does not
warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement to that
effect and the basis for it be included in the preamble if a full
regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared. Such a
determination has been made for this direct final rule. The reasoning
for this determination follows.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This direct final rule relieves regulatory burdens for certified
flight instructor applicants and pilots in command. It also makes clear
that applications for replacement airman and medical certificates may
be obtained using methods other than individual letters mailed to the
Airmen Certification Branch or Aerospace Medical Certification
Division, respectively.
Since the direct final rule will impose no new costs, and updates
four sections of part 61, the expected outcome will be a minimal impact
with positive net benefits. A regulatory evaluation was not prepared.
The FAA, therefore, has determined that this direct final rule is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, this action has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget. Further, this direct final rule is
not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's Regulatory Policies and
Procedures.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) establishes ``as a
principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall endeavor,
consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable statutes,
to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale of the
businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required to solicit
and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain the rationale
for their actions to assure that such proposals are given serious
consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be
clear.
This rule relieves regulatory restrictions for certified flight
instructor applicants and pilots in command. It also makes clear that
applications for replacement airmen and medical certificates may be
obtained using methods other than individual letters mailed to the
Airmen Certification Branch or Aerospace Medical Certification
Division, respectively. Small businesses and small entities are not
impacted by this action.
This direct final rule imposes no new costs and updates and
clarifies four sections of part 61; the expected outcome will have only
a minimal impact on any small entity affected by this rulemaking
action.
Therefore, as the FAA Administrator, I certify that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this direct final rule and determined
that it will have only a domestic impact and therefore no effect on
international trade.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $143.1 million in lieu of $100
million. This direct final rule does not contain such a mandate;
therefore, the requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. According to the 1995
amendments to the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR 1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an
agency may not collect or sponsor the collection of information, nor
may it impose an information collection requirement unless it displays
a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
This action contains the following revision to the existing
information collection requirements previously approved under OMB
Control Number 2120-0021, Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors,
and Ground Instructors. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)), the FAA has submitted this information collection
revision to the Office of Management and Budget for its review.
This direct final rule reduces the recordkeeping burden for an
airman who passes a practical test for issuance of a flight instructor
certificate, a practical test for the addition of a rating to a flight
instructor certificate, a practical test for renewal of a flight
instructor certificate, or a practical test for the reinstatement of a
flight instructor certificate as this rule will now allow passage of
such a test to meet the 24-calendar month flight review requirements
for the airman. This rule also relieves regulatory burdens for airmen
by making clear that the recent flight experience requirements do not
apply to a pilot in command who is employed by an operator certificated
under 14 CFR part 135 if the pilot in command is also in compliance
with the pilot in command qualifications and recent experience
requirements of part 135.
Flight reviews: The current information collection estimates that,
of the total active pilot population of 700,000, some 190,000 pilots
complete a flight review per year with an average
[[Page 56826]]
time of 0.1 hours each (6 minutes) necessary for the flight instructor
to record the flight review. This rule reduces that recordkeeping
burden by permitting an airman who passes a practical test for issuance
of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for the addition
of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for
renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a practical test for the
reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate to meet the flight
review requirements.
During calendar year 2012, the FAA issued 4,127 original certified
flight instructor certificates and 4,034 \8\ certified flight
instructor certificates for the addition of a rating. These persons
will no longer be required to complete the flight review. Thus, the FAA
estimates that 8,161 airmen annually will no longer be required to
complete flight reviews because they passed a practical test for
issuance of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for the
addition of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a practical
test for renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a practical
test for the reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate.
Therefore, the FAA estimates that this rule will reduce the burden by
816.1 hours annually.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This number reflects practical tests for an additional
rating to a flight instructor certificate, for renewal of a flight
instructor certificate, and for reinstatement of a flight instructor
certificate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recent flight experience: The current information collection
estimates that 290,000 pilots are subject to these recordkeeping
requirements at an average of 0.1 hours (6 minutes) each. While this
rule clarifies that the recent flight experience requirements do not
apply to a pilot in command who is employed by the holder of a part 119
operating certificate that authorizes operations under 14 CFR part 135
if the pilot in command is also in compliance with the pilot in command
qualifications and recent experience requirements of part 135, the FAA
does not believe that the burden related to this information collection
will change in a manner that is quantifiable. Based on the information
received from the industry, the FAA believes that part 119 certificate
holders have been interpreting the regulations to permit pilots who
complete the recency requirements under part 135 to use this provision
regardless of whether they are employed by a certificate holder that
holds an air carrier certificate or an operating certificate. While a
small number of persons may benefit from this regulatory change, the
FAA believes that those numbers are small as most part 119 certificate
holders have already been operating in a manner similar to the
regulations being revised and clarified by this rule. Therefore, the
FAA is not revising the burden associated with the recent flight
experience element of this information collection.
Based on the change made by this direct final rule to the
information collection related to certified flight instructor flight
reviews, the recordkeeping requirements associated with 14 CFR 61.56
are reduced from 19,000 annual burden hours to 18,184 annual burden
hours, reflecting the reduction in number of annual responses for this
aspect of the information collection from 190,000 responses to 181,839
responses.
Information Collection 2120-0021: Certification: Pilots, Flight
Instructors, and Ground Instructors
Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
collection.
Form(s): FAA form 8710-1.
Frequency: The information is collected on occasion.
Abstract: 14 CFR Part 61 prescribes certification standards for
pilots, flight instructors, and ground instructors. The information
collected is used to determine compliance with applicant eligibility,
via FAA form 8710-1.
The following table provides information regarding annual responses
and annual burden hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average time
Provision CFR Sec. Number of per response Total annual
responses (hours) burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
61.13........................................................... 100,000 0.1 10,000
61.197.......................................................... 40,000 0.1 4,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
61.39........................................................... 100,000 0.05 5,000
61.49........................................................... 13,600 0.05 680
61.51........................................................... 190,000 1.0 190,000
61.56(a)........................................................ 181,839 0.1 18,184
61.57........................................................... 290,000 0.1 29,000
61.87........................................................... 80,000 0.05 4,000
61.93........................................................... 80,000 0.1 8,000
61.125.......................................................... 9,500 0.2 1,900
61.185.......................................................... 5,800 0.1 580
61.189.......................................................... 30,000 1.0 30,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 1,120,739 .............. 301,344
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agency is soliciting comments to--
Evaluate whether the proposed information requirement is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of collecting information on those who
are to respond, including by using appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Individuals and organizations may send comments on the information
[[Page 56827]]
collection requirement to the address listed in the ADDRESSES section
at the beginning of this preamble by October 16, 2013. Comments also
should be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer for FAA,
New Executive Office Building, Room 10202, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
International Compatibility and Cooperation
In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to conform to
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has
reviewed the corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices and
has identified no differences with these regulations.
Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation
Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation, (77 FR 26413, May 4, 2012) promotes international
regulatory cooperation to meet shared challenges involving health,
safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues and to reduce,
eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive Order 13609, and has determined
that this action would have no effect on international regulatory
cooperation.
Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical
exclusion identified in paragraph 312f and involves no extraordinary
circumstances.
Administrative Procedure Act
An agency may find good cause to exempt a rule from certain
provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553),
including notice of proposed rulemaking and the opportunity for public
comment, if it is determined to be unnecessary, impracticable, or
contrary to the public interest. This rule relieves regulatory
restrictions by permitting an airman who passes a practical test for
issuance of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for the
addition of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a practical
test for renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a practical
test for the reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate to meet
the 24-calendar month flight review requirements of part 61. This rule
also clarifies that the recent flight experience requirements of Sec.
61.57 do not apply to a pilot in command who is employed by an operator
certificated under 14 CFR part 135 if the pilot in command is in
compliance with the pilot in command qualifications and recent
experience requirements of part 135. Finally, this rule permits
replacement airmen and medical certificates to be requested online, or
by any other method acceptable to the Administrator. Therefore, the FAA
finds good cause to publish this action as a direct final rule. Please
see the ``Direct Final Rule Procedure'' section for more information.
Executive Order 13132
The FAA has analyzed this final rule under the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, or the relationship between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government, and, therefore, does not have
Federalism implications.
Executive Order 13211, Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The agency has determined that it
is not a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order, and
it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
III. Additional Information
A. Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The agency
also invites comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the rulemaking
action in this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the rulemaking action, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one
copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically,
commenters should submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this rulemaking. Before confirming this direct
final rule, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The agency may change this rulemaking
action in light of the comments it receives.
Proprietary or Confidential Business Information: Do not file
proprietary or confidential business information in the docket. Such
information must be sent or delivered directly to the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document, and
marked as proprietary or confidential. If submitting information on a
disk or CD-ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM, and identify
electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that
is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), if the FAA is aware of proprietary
information filed with a comment, the agency does not place it in the
docket. It is held in a separate file to which the public does not have
access, and the FAA places a note in the docket that it has received
it. If the FAA receives a request to examine or copy this information,
it treats it as any other request under the Freedom of Information Act
(5 U.S.C. 552). The FAA processes such a request under Department of
Transportation procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
B. Availability of Rulemaking Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking documents may be obtained from the
Internet by--
Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
Accessing the Government Printing Office's Federal Digital
System Web page at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
Copies may also be obtained by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680.
Commenters
[[Page 56828]]
must identify the docket or amendment number of this rulemaking.
All documents the FAA considered in developing this rulemaking
action, including economic analyses and technical reports, may be
accessed from the Internet through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
referenced above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 61
Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Teachers.
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 61--CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND
INSTRUCTORS
0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701-44703, 44707,
44709-44711, 45102-45103, 45301-45302.
0
2. Section 61.3 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) introductory
text, (a)(1), (b), and (i)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.3 Requirement for certificates, ratings, and authorizations.
(a) Required pilot certificate for operating a civil aircraft of
the United States. No person may serve as a required pilot flight
crewmember of a civil aircraft of the United States, unless that
person:
(1) Has in the person's physical possession or readily accessible
in the aircraft when exercising the privileges of that pilot
certificate or authorization--
(i) A pilot certificate issued under this part and in accordance
with Sec. 61.19;
(ii) A special purpose pilot authorization issued under Sec.
61.77;
(iii) A temporary certificate issued under Sec. 61.17;
(iv) A document conveying temporary authority to exercise
certificate privileges issued by the Airmen Certification Branch under
Sec. 61.29(e); or
(v) When operating an aircraft within a foreign country, a pilot
license issued by that country may be used.
* * * * *
(b) Required pilot certificate for operating a foreign-registered
aircraft within the United States. No person may serve as a required
pilot flight crewmember of a civil aircraft of foreign registry within
the United States, unless--
(1) That person's pilot certificate or document issued under Sec.
61.29(e) is in that person's physical possession or readily accessible
in the aircraft when exercising the privileges of that pilot
certificate; and
(2) Has been issued in accordance with this part, or has been
issued or validated by the country in which the aircraft is registered.
* * * * *
(i) Ground instructor certificate. (1) Each person who holds a
ground instructor certificate issued under this part must have that
certificate or a temporary document issued under Sec. 61.29(e) in that
person's physical possession or immediately accessible when exercising
the privileges of that certificate.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 61.29 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and
(e) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.29 Replacement of a lost or destroyed airman or medical
certificate or knowledge test report.
(a) A request for the replacement of a lost or destroyed airman
certificate issued under this part must be made:
(1) By letter to the Department of Transportation, FAA, Airmen
Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125, and must
be accompanied by a check or money order for the appropriate fee
payable to the FAA; or
(2) In any other manner and form approved by the Administrator
including a request online to Airmen Services at https://www.faa.gov,
and must be accompanied by acceptable form of payment for the
appropriate fee.
(b) A request for the replacement of a lost or destroyed medical
certificate must be made:
(1) By letter to the Department of Transportation, FAA, Aerospace
Medical Certification Division, P.O. Box 26200, Oklahoma City, OK
73125, and must be accompanied by a check or money order for the
appropriate fee payable to the FAA; or
(2) In any other manner and form approved by the Administrator and
must be accompanied by acceptable form of payment for the appropriate
fee.
(c) A request for the replacement of a lost or destroyed knowledge
test report must be made:
(1) By letter to the Department of Transportation, FAA, Airmen
Certification Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125, and must
be accompanied by a check or money order for the appropriate fee
payable to the FAA; or
(2) In any other manner and form approved by the Administrator and
must be accompanied by acceptable form of payment for the appropriate
fee.
* * * * *
(e) A person who has lost an airman certificate, medical
certificate, or knowledge test report may obtain, in a form or manner
approved by the Administrator, a document conveying temporary authority
to exercise certificate privileges from the FAA Aeromedical
Certification Branch or the Airman Certification Branch, as
appropriate, and the:
(1) Document may be carried as an airman certificate, medical
certificate, or knowledge test report, as appropriate, for up to 60
days pending the person's receipt of a duplicate under paragraph (a),
(b), or (c) of this section, unless the person has been notified that
the certificate has been suspended or revoked.
(2) Request for such a document must include the date on which a
duplicate certificate or knowledge test report was previously
requested.
0
4. Section 61.56 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 61.56 Flight review.
* * * * *
(d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c)
of this section, passed any of the following need not accomplish the
flight review required by this section:
(1) A pilot proficiency check or practical test conducted by an
examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a
pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege.
(2) A practical test conducted by an examiner for the issuance of a
flight instructor certificate, an additional rating on a flight
instructor certificate, renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or
reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 61.57 is amended by--
0
A. Revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2),
0
B. Redesignating paragraph (e)(3) as paragraph (e)(4) and revising the
introductory text of newly redesignated paragraph (e)(4), and
0
C. Adding new paragraph (e)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.57 Recent flight experience: Pilot in command.
* * * * *
(e) Exceptions. (1) Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not
apply to a pilot in command who is employed by a part 119 certificate
holder authorized to conduct operations under part 125
[[Page 56829]]
when the pilot is engaged in a flight operation for that certificate
holder if the pilot in command is in compliance with Sec. Sec. 125.281
and 125.285 of this chapter.
(2) This section does not apply to a pilot in command who is
employed by a part 119 certificate holder authorized to conduct
operations under part 121 when the pilot is engaged in a flight
operation under parts 91 and 121 for that certificate holder if the
pilot in command is in compliance with Sec. Sec. 121.435 or 121.436,
as applicable, and Sec. 121.439 of this chapter.
(3) This section does not apply to a pilot in command who is
employed by a part 119 certificate holder authorized to conduct
operations under part 135 when the pilot is engaged in a flight
operation under parts 91 and 135 for that certificate holder if the
pilot in command is in compliance with Sec. Sec. 135.243 and 135.247
of this chapter.
(4) Paragraph (b) of this section does not apply to a pilot in
command of a turbine-powered airplane that is type certificated for
more than one pilot crewmember, provided that pilot has complied with
the requirements of paragraph (e)(4)(i) or (ii) of this section:
* * * * *
Issued under authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 44701(a),
and 44703, in Washington, DC, on August 27, 2013.
Michael P. Huerta,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-22485 Filed 9-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P