Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication Devices and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation, 55096-55098 [2013-21843]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
55096
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Belkin International, Inc., 12045 E.
Waterfront Drive, Playa Vista, CA
90094.
D-Link Corporation, No. 289, Sinhu 3rd
Road, Neihu District, Taipei City
114, Taiwan.
D-Link System, Inc., 17595 Mount
Herrmann Street, Fountain Valley,
CA 92708.
Netgear Inc., 350 East Plumeria Drive,
San Jose, CA 95134.
Nintendo Co., Ltd., 11–1 Kamitobohokotate-cho, Minami-ku, Kyoto,
Japan.
Nintendo of America, Inc., 4600 150th
Avenue NE., Richmond, WA 98052.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1224–1225
(Preliminary)]
Ferrosilicon from Russia and
Venezuela
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there
is a reasonable indication that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from Russia and Venezuela of
ferrosilicon, provided for in
subheadings 7202.21.10, 7202.21.50,
7202.21.75, 7202.21.90, and 7202.29.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that are alleged to be
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV).
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigation
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) of an affirmative
preliminary determination in the
investigation under section 733(b) of the
Act, or, if the preliminary determination
is negative, upon notice of an
affirmative final determination in that
investigation under section 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigations. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
Issued: September 4, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
Background
On July 19, 2013, a petition was filed
with the Commission and Commerce by
[FR Doc. 2013–21846 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am]
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Sep 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. (‘‘GSM’’),
New York, New York; CC Metals and
Alloys, LLC (‘‘CCMA’’), Calvert City,
Kentucky; the United Steel, Paper and
Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union (‘‘USW’’);
and the International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America
(‘‘UAW’’), alleging that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
and threatened with material injury by
reason of LTFV imports of ferrosilicon
from Russia and Venezuela.
Accordingly, effective July 19, 2013, the
Commission instituted antidumping
duty investigation nos. 731–TA–1224–
1225 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of July 25, 2013 (78 FR
44969). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on August 9, 2013, and
all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on
September 3, 2013. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4426 (September 2013),
entitled Ferrosilicon from Russia and
Venezuela: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–
1224–1225 (Preliminary).
Issued: September 3, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–21842 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–892]
Certain Point-to-Point Network
Communication Devices and Products
Containing Same; Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
August 1, 2013, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2013 / Notices
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Straight Path
IP Group, Inc. of Glen Allen, Virginia.
A letter supplementing the Complaint
was filed on August 21, 2013. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain point-topoint network communication devices
and products containing same by reason
of infringement of U.S. Patent No.
6,009,469 (‘‘the ‘469 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 6,108,704 (‘‘the ‘704 patent’’);
and U.S. Patent No. 6,131,121 (‘‘the ‘121
patent’’); and that an industry in the
United States exists or is in the process
of being established as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complaint requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, and in section
210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
September 3, 2013, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Sep 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain point-to-point
network communication devices and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
1–3, 9, 10, 17, and 18 of the ‘469 patent;
claims 1, 11, 12, 19, 22, 23, and 30 of
the ‘704 patent; and claims 6 and 13 of
the ‘121 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists or
is in the process of being established as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), and (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Straight Path IP Group, Inc., 5300
Hickory Park Drive, Suite 218, Glen
Allen, VA 23059.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
AmTran Logistics, Inc., 9 Goddard,
Irvine, CA 92618.
AmTran Technology Co., Ltd., 17f, 268,
Lien Cheng Road, 23553 New Taipei
City, Taiwan.
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers,
20, Yeouido-dong, Yeoungdeungpogu, Seoul, 157–721, Republic of
Korea.
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan
Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.
LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A.,
Inc., 10101 Old Grove Road, San
Diego, CA 92131.
Panasonic Corporation, 1006, Oaza
Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka, 571–
8501, Japan.
Panasonic Corporation of North
America, One Panasonic Way,
Secaucus, NJ 07094.
Sharp Corporation, 22–22 Nagaike-cho,
Abenko-Ku, Osaka 545–8522, Japan.
Sharp Electronics Corporation, 1 Sharp
Plaza, Mahwah, NJ 07495.
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., 1–
7–1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–
0075, Japan.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55097
Sony Computer Entertainment America
Inc., 919 East Hillsdale Boulevard,
2nd Floor, Foster City, CA 94404.
Sony Computer Entertainment America
LLC, 919 East Hillsdale Boulevard,
2nd Floor, Foster City, CA 94404.
Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108–0075, Japan.
Sony Corporation of America, 550
Madison Avenue, Floor 27, New York,
NY 10022–3211.
Sony Electronics Inc., 16530 Via
Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127.
Sony Mobile Communications AB, Nya
Vattentornet, Lund, 221 88, Sweden.
Sony Mobile Communications (USA)
Inc., 7001 Development Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications,
(USA) Inc., 333 Piedmont Road NE.,
Suite 600, Atlanta, GA 30305–1811.
Toshiba Corporation, 1–1, Shibaura 1chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105–8001,
Japan.
Toshiba America Inc., 1251 Avenue of
the Americas, New York, NY 10020.
Toshiba America Information Systems,
Inc., 9740 Irvine Boulevard, Irvine,
CA 92618–1697.
Vizio, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
55098
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2013 / Notices
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: September 4, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–21843 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–13–022]
Sunshine Act Meeting
United
States International Trade Commission.
TIME AND DATE: September 12, 2013 at
11:00 a.m.
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agendas for future meetings: none
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Vote in Inv. No. 731–TA–919 (Second
Review)(Welded Large Diameter
Line Pipe from Japan). The
Commission is currently scheduled
to complete and file its
determinations and views of the
Commission on or before September
26, 2013.
5. Outstanding action jackets: none
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 5, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–21994 Filed 9–5–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Vermont Asbestos Group, Inc. was
lodged with the United States District
Court for the District of Vermont.
In the United States’ action brought
under Sections 106, 107, and 113(g)(2)
of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9606, 9607 and
9613(g)(2) (‘‘CERCLA’’), the United
States seeks injunctive relief requiring
the Vermont Asbestos Group (‘‘Settling
Defendant’’) to perform the operation
and maintenance of the erosion control
structures constructed by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency
at the Vermont Asbestos Group Mine
Superfund Site in Lowell and Eden,
Vermont. The United States also seeks
to recover costs incurred and to be
incurred by the United States in
response to releases or threatened
releases of hazardous substances at or
from the Site.
The settlement, based on Settling
Defendant’s limited ‘‘ability to pay,’’
requires Settling Defendant to undertake
the operation and maintenance of the
erosion control structures at the Site;
pay the State of Vermont $5,000 per
year for ten years; and stipulate to a
judgment in favor of the United States
in the amount of $3,360,082 for EPA’s
past cleanup costs and in favor of the
State in the amount of $174,620 for the
State’s past cleanup costs. The Settling
Defendant also stipulates to the entry of
a judgment in favor of the State for State
Future Response Costs estimated to be
at least $28,458,399. These stipulated
amounts are to be satisfied only through
the recovery of insurance proceeds.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Vermont Asbestos
Group, Inc. (D. Vt.) D.J Ref. No. 90–11–
3–07425/3. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decrees Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Notice is hereby given that on
September 3, 2013, a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Vermont
Asbestos Group, Inc., Civil Action No.
2:13–cv–00238–wks, between the
United States, State of Vermont, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Sep 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Decrees.html. We will provide paper
copies of the consent decree upon
written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to: Consent Decree
Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box
7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $10.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Robert E. Maher, Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–21856 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On August 29, 2013, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado in the
lawsuit entitled United States v The
Dow Chemical Company, 1:13–cv–2330.
The Consent Decree resolves the
claims of the United States set forth in
the complaint against The Dow
Chemical Company for costs incurred
and to be incurred in connection with
the Twins Inn Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’),
located in Arvada, Jefferson County,
Colorado, pursuant to Section 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607. Under
the Consent Decree, the settling
defendant agrees to finance and perform
the work for the Site and to reimburse
$400,000 in past costs to the United
States Environmental Protection
Agency.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. The Dow Chemical
Company, D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–2–08744/
1. All comments must be submitted no
later than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55096-55098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21843]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-892]
Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication Devices and Products
Containing Same; Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 1, 2013, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
[[Page 55097]]
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Straight Path IP Group, Inc. of Glen Allen,
Virginia. A letter supplementing the Complaint was filed on August 21,
2013. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain point-to-
point network communication devices and products containing same by
reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,009,469 (``the `469
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704 (``the `704 patent''); and U.S.
Patent No. 6,131,121 (``the `121 patent''); and that an industry in the
United States exists or is in the process of being established as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complaint requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in
section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
CFR 210.10 (2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on September 3, 2013, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain point-to-
point network communication devices and products containing same by
reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1-3, 9, 10, 17, and 18
of the `469 patent; claims 1, 11, 12, 19, 22, 23, and 30 of the `704
patent; and claims 6 and 13 of the `121 patent, and whether an industry
in the United States exists or is in the process of being established
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), and (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Straight Path IP Group, Inc., 5300 Hickory Park Drive, Suite 218, Glen
Allen, VA 23059.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
AmTran Logistics, Inc., 9 Goddard, Irvine, CA 92618.
AmTran Technology Co., Ltd., 17f, 268, Lien Cheng Road, 23553 New
Taipei City, Taiwan.
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20, Yeouido-dong, Yeoungdeungpo-
gu, Seoul, 157-721, Republic of Korea.
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
07632.
LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., 10101 Old Grove Road, San
Diego, CA 92131.
Panasonic Corporation, 1006, Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka, 571-8501,
Japan.
Panasonic Corporation of North America, One Panasonic Way, Secaucus, NJ
07094.
Sharp Corporation, 22-22 Nagaike-cho, Abenko-Ku, Osaka 545-8522, Japan.
Sharp Electronics Corporation, 1 Sharp Plaza, Mahwah, NJ 07495.
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-
0075, Japan.
Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., 919 East Hillsdale Boulevard,
2nd Floor, Foster City, CA 94404.
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, 919 East Hillsdale Boulevard,
2nd Floor, Foster City, CA 94404.
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan.
Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Avenue, Floor 27, New York, NY
10022-3211.
Sony Electronics Inc., 16530 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127.
Sony Mobile Communications AB, Nya Vattentornet, Lund, 221 88, Sweden.
Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., 7001 Development Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, (USA) Inc., 333 Piedmont Road NE.,
Suite 600, Atlanta, GA 30305-1811.
Toshiba Corporation, 1-1, Shibaura 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8001,
Japan.
Toshiba America Inc., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020.
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., 9740 Irvine Boulevard,
Irvine, CA 92618-1697.
Vizio, Inc., 39 Tesla, Irvine, CA 92618.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
[[Page 55098]]
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: September 4, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-21843 Filed 9-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
