Proposed Collection; 60-day Comment Request; Data Collection To Understand How NIH Programs Apply Methodologies To Improve Their Research Programs (MIRP), 55084-55085 [2013-21807]

Download as PDF 55084 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2013 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued Number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Survey name Average burden hours per response Total annual burden hours requested Survey: Could Your Genes Predict Your Weight? .......................................... Survey: Kids, Genes, and Health .................................................................... Survey: Celebrities, Prescription Drugs & Salmon .......................................... Survey: Will Genome Sequence Information Change How You View Yourself? .............................................................................................................. Survey: Exploring Our Identity: Genetics, Ancestry, and Race ...................... 30,000 30,000 30,000 1 1 1 17/60 17/60 20/60 8,500 8,500 10,000 30,000 30,000 1 1 10/60 20/60 5,000 10,000 Totals ........................................................................................................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 91,000 Dated: July 15, 2013. Gloria Butler, Project Clearance Liaison, NHGRI, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. 2013–21808 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Proposed Collection; 60-day Comment Request; Data Collection To Understand How NIH Programs Apply Methodologies To Improve Their Research Programs (MIRP) In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. Written comments and/or suggestions from the public and affected agencies are invited on one or more of the following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:01 Sep 06, 2013 Jkt 229001 To Submit Comments and for Further Information: To obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, submit comments in writing, or request more information on the proposed project, contact: Ms. Dione Washington, Strategic Planning and Evaluation Branch, OSPIDA, NIAID, NIH, 6610 Rockledge Dr, Rm 2501 Bethesda, MD 20892–6620, or Email your request, including your address to washingtondi@niaid.nih.gov. Formal requests for additional plans and instruments must be requested in writing. Comment Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days of the date of this publication. Proposed Collection: Data Collection to Understand How NIH Programs Apply Methodologies to Improve Their Research Programs (MIRP), 0925New, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Need and Use of Information Collection: In this submission, NIAID is requesting an OMB generic clearance for formative research activities relating to the collection of data to assist the Institute in understanding the usefulness of a range of methodologies that are employed to increase organizational effectiveness. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) have instructed agencies to apply rigorous strategy management principles to ensure resources are directed at high-priority programs and avoid duplication of effort. A key aspect to ensuring resources dedicated to these programs are applied efficiently and effectively is to understand how NIH research programs apply methodologies to improve their organizational effectiveness. The degree of an organization’s effectiveness is commonly recognized to be influenced by many factors. These can include the clarity of its purpose and strategy, how it allocates and structures its work, the PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 processes used to carry out operations, the way technologies are used to support work, the people involved and their skills and abilities, the way relationships are managed with partners and stakeholders, and how leadership functions, particularly in terms of its ability to ensure that all the other components are aligned in supporting work towards the mission. Many methodologies are commonly employed in all sectors, including government, with the goal of increasing organizational effectiveness. Some examples of those used widely are strategic planning and strategy management, total quality management, change management, organizational assessment and intervention, organizational design, process improvement, leadership development, performance management, and workforce training and professional development, among others. There are many models and approaches to each of these methodologies. Each one can be implemented in a wide range of ways. Reflection on and learning from methodologies that have been used and the ways in which they have been employed is critical to continually ensuring that government functions effectively. The primary use for information gathered through voluntary survey pilot testing, surveys, focus groups, interviews, and collaborative data interpretation meetings to understand the use of strategy management in research programs supported by the NIH. The information will improve approaches to implementing strategic management, which will lead to more efficient use of resources. Results gathered in these data will be used to enhance implementation of methodologies to improve organizational effectiveness. The main goal of this information is to improve program outcomes and increase the efficiency of resource utilization. The knowledge gained from these collections will be used to strengthen E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1 55085 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 174 / Monday, September 9, 2013 / Notices the planning, implementation, and monitoring of NIH research programs, as well as to strengthen strategy management in NIH research programs. The questions asked, and the data to be collected are rooted in established business-based paradigms but specifically adapted for use (and relevance) in a biomedical research environment, in order to discern: (1) Factors that enhance (or inhibit) organizational effectiveness in research programs; (2) utility and acceptance of these kinds of efforts among biomedical researchers and research stakeholders. The results from this formative research project will inform quality improvement activities in several areas, including goal setting, capability and resource evaluation, operational efficiency, and performance monitoring. Utilized data collection methodologies will be administered in a manner that minimizes public information collection burden. These include, but are not limited to, surveys, focus groups, and/ or cognitive interviews. Separate and distinct generic clearances are requested to facilitate the efficiency of submission and review of these projects as required by the OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. OMB approval is requested for 3 years. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 4775. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Pilot Test .................................... Number of responses per respondent 900 1 45/60 675 2500 1000 375 150 Type of respondent 1 1 1 1 30/60 90/60 2/60 4/60 1250 1500 750 600 Science professional, researchers, institutional officials, network leadership, program administrators, and research site staff. Survey ........................................ Interview ..................................... Focus group ............................... Data interpretation meeting with stakeholders. Dated: August 22, 2013. John McGowan, Executive Officer (EO), OD, NIAID, NIH. Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Marina Broitman, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6153, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892–9608, 301–402–8152, mbroitma@mail.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS) [FR Doc. 2013–21807 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Mental Health Research Network II. Date: September 30, 2013. Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:01 Sep 06, 2013 Average burden per response (in hours) Number of respondents Form name Jkt 229001 Dated: September 3, 2013. Carolyn Baum, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2013–21786 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Total annual burden hour the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Peer Review Meeting. Date: September 24, 2013. Time: 12:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals. Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Richard W. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700–B Rockledge Drive, MSC–7616, Room 3251, Bethesda, MD 20892–7616, 301–451–2663, rmorris@niaid.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: September 3, 2013. David Clary, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2013–21787 Filed 9–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55084-55085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Proposed Collection; 60-day Comment Request; Data Collection To 
Understand How NIH Programs Apply Methodologies To Improve Their 
Research Programs (MIRP)

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment 
on proposed data collection projects, National Institute of Allergy and 
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), will publish 
periodic summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
    Written comments and/or suggestions from the public and affected 
agencies are invited on one or more of the following points: (1) 
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the function of the agency, including whether the 
information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including the 
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    To Submit Comments and for Further Information: To obtain a copy of 
the data collection plans and instruments, submit comments in writing, 
or request more information on the proposed project, contact: Ms. Dione 
Washington, Strategic Planning and Evaluation Branch, OSPIDA, NIAID, 
NIH, 6610 Rockledge Dr, Rm 2501 Bethesda, MD 20892-6620, or Email your 
request, including your address to washingtondi@niaid.nih.gov. Formal 
requests for additional plans and instruments must be requested in 
writing.
    Comment Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection 
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days 
of the date of this publication.
    Proposed Collection: Data Collection to Understand How NIH Programs 
Apply Methodologies to Improve Their Research Programs (MIRP), 0925New, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National 
Institutes of Health (NIH).
    Need and Use of Information Collection: In this submission, NIAID 
is requesting an OMB generic clearance for formative research 
activities relating to the collection of data to assist the Institute 
in understanding the usefulness of a range of methodologies that are 
employed to increase organizational effectiveness. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) and Office of Science and Technology Policy 
(OSTP) have instructed agencies to apply rigorous strategy management 
principles to ensure resources are directed at high-priority programs 
and avoid duplication of effort. A key aspect to ensuring resources 
dedicated to these programs are applied efficiently and effectively is 
to understand how NIH research programs apply methodologies to improve 
their organizational effectiveness. The degree of an organization's 
effectiveness is commonly recognized to be influenced by many factors. 
These can include the clarity of its purpose and strategy, how it 
allocates and structures its work, the processes used to carry out 
operations, the way technologies are used to support work, the people 
involved and their skills and abilities, the way relationships are 
managed with partners and stakeholders, and how leadership functions, 
particularly in terms of its ability to ensure that all the other 
components are aligned in supporting work towards the mission. Many 
methodologies are commonly employed in all sectors, including 
government, with the goal of increasing organizational effectiveness. 
Some examples of those used widely are strategic planning and strategy 
management, total quality management, change management, organizational 
assessment and intervention, organizational design, process 
improvement, leadership development, performance management, and 
workforce training and professional development, among others. There 
are many models and approaches to each of these methodologies. Each one 
can be implemented in a wide range of ways. Reflection on and learning 
from methodologies that have been used and the ways in which they have 
been employed is critical to continually ensuring that government 
functions effectively.
    The primary use for information gathered through voluntary survey 
pilot testing, surveys, focus groups, interviews, and collaborative 
data interpretation meetings to understand the use of strategy 
management in research programs supported by the NIH. The information 
will improve approaches to implementing strategic management, which 
will lead to more efficient use of resources. Results gathered in these 
data will be used to enhance implementation of methodologies to improve 
organizational effectiveness. The main goal of this information is to 
improve program outcomes and increase the efficiency of resource 
utilization. The knowledge gained from these collections will be used 
to strengthen

[[Page 55085]]

the planning, implementation, and monitoring of NIH research programs, 
as well as to strengthen strategy management in NIH research programs.
    The questions asked, and the data to be collected are rooted in 
established business-based paradigms but specifically adapted for use 
(and relevance) in a biomedical research environment, in order to 
discern: (1) Factors that enhance (or inhibit) organizational 
effectiveness in research programs; (2) utility and acceptance of these 
kinds of efforts among biomedical researchers and research 
stakeholders. The results from this formative research project will 
inform quality improvement activities in several areas, including goal 
setting, capability and resource evaluation, operational efficiency, 
and performance monitoring. Utilized data collection methodologies will 
be administered in a manner that minimizes public information 
collection burden. These include, but are not limited to, surveys, 
focus groups, and/or cognitive interviews. Separate and distinct 
generic clearances are requested to facilitate the efficiency of 
submission and review of these projects as required by the OMB Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
    OMB approval is requested for 3 years. There are no costs to 
respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized 
burden hours are 4775.

                                                            Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                              Average
                                                                                             Number of       Number of      burden per     Total annual
                   Form name                                Type of respondent              respondents    responses per   response (in     burden hour
                                                                                                            respondent        hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pilot Test.....................................  Science professional, researchers,                  900               1           45/60             675
                                                  institutional officials, network
                                                  leadership, program administrators,
                                                  and research site staff.
Survey.........................................                                                     2500               1           30/60            1250
Interview......................................                                                     1000               1           90/60            1500
Focus group....................................                                                      375               1            2/60             750
Data interpretation meeting with stakeholders..                                                      150               1            4/60             600
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: August 22, 2013.
John McGowan,
Executive Officer (EO), OD, NIAID, NIH.
[FR Doc. 2013-21807 Filed 9-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.