Extension of Port Limits of Indianapolis, IN, 54755-54756 [2013-21772]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
54755
SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO PART 748—AUTHORIZATION VALIDATED END-USER (VEU): LIST OF VALIDATED END-USERS,
RESPECTIVE ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR EXPORT, REEXPORT AND TRANSFER, AND ELIGIBLE DESTINATIONS
Country
Eligible items
(by ECCN)
Validated end-user
Federal Register
citation
Eligible destination
Nothing in this Supplement shall be deemed to supersede other provisions in the EAR, including but not limited to § 748.15(c).
*
*
Intel Semiconductor
(Dalian) Ltd.
....................................
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 29, 2013.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–21579 Filed 9–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. USCBP–2012–0006; CBP Dec.
13–13]
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Extension of Port Limits of
Indianapolis, IN
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) is extending the
geographical limits of the port of entry
SUMMARY:
14:46 Sep 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
of Indianapolis, Indiana. This extension
will make the boundaries more easily
identifiable to the public and will allow
for uniform and continuous service to
the extended area of Indianapolis,
Indiana. The change is part of CBP’s
continuing program to use its personnel,
facilities, and resources more efficiently,
and to provide better service to carriers,
importers, and the general public.
DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Kaplan, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, by phone at (202) 325–4543,
or by email at Roger.Kaplan@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 24656) on April 25,
2012, CBP proposed to amend the list of
CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1)
to extend the limits of the Indianapolis,
Indiana, port of entry to include all the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
*
*Intel Semiconductor
(Dalian) Ltd., No.
109 Huai He Road
East, Dalian Economic and Technology Development Area, Dalian,
Liao Ning Province,
116600, China.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
78 FR [INSERT
PAGE NUMBER],
9–6–13.
** Intel Semiconductor
(Dalian) Ltd., c/o
Dalian Kintetsu Logistics Co., Ltd,
Dayaowan Bonded
Port No. 6 Road
W4 Unit A1, Dalian
Economic and
Technology Development Area,
Dalian, Liao Ning
Province, 116601,
China.
*
I. Background
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
*
These items authorized for the Intel destination identified by one asterisk (*):
1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 2B006.b,
2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 3B001
(except for multilayer masks with a phase
shift layer designed to produce ‘‘space
qualified’’ semiconductor devices), 3C002,
3E002 (excluding development and production technology specific to digital signal
processors and digital array processors
and further limited to ‘‘technology’’ based
on the international technology roadmap
for
semiconductors
(ITRS)),
and
4E001(limited to technology for computer
products or components not exceeding an
adjusted peak performance (APP) level of
12.0 weighted teraflops).
These items authorized for the Intel destination identified by two asterisks (**):
1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 2B006.b,
2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 3B001
(except for multilayer masks with a phase
shift layer designed to produce ‘‘space
qualified’’ semiconductor devices), and
3C002.
*
*
territory within the boundaries of
Marion County, Indiana, as well as
portions of the neighboring counties of
Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson. This
update will allow CBP to better serve
the public in the greater Indianapolis
area by providing regular service to
municipalities within Indianapolis that
are not technically within the city
limits, and to locations to the immediate
west and south of the city. CBP
determined that the proposed boundary
changes would not result in a change in
the service that is provided to the public
by the port and would not change the
workload at the port or require a change
in the staffing at the port. Further
background information is provided in
the NPRM.
Interested parties were given until
June 25, 2012, to comment on the
proposed changes. CBP received one
comment in response to the NPRM.
II. Comment Analysis
Comment: The commenter notes that
Indianapolis, Indiana, is surrounded by
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
54756
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
four other states and recommends that
CBP should utilize other resources,
apparently from the surrounding states,
to better support Indianapolis.
Response: CBP is seeking to establish
definitive geographic port limits to
make the boundaries more easily
identifiable to the public and to allow
for uniform and continuous service to
the extended area of Indianapolis,
Indiana. This is a no-cost administrative
measure and CBP will not need
additional resources to implement the
proposed boundary changes. As
specified in the NPRM, the proposed
changes will not result in changes to the
workload or staffing levels at the port.
III. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed in the
NPRM, CBP is extending the
geographical limits of the port of entry
of Indianapolis, Indiana, to include all
the territory within the boundaries of
Marion County, Indiana, as well as
portions of the neighboring counties of
Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson. The
port of entry description of
Indianapolis, Indiana, will be revised as
proposed in the NPRM and set forth in
the map included in the docket as
‘‘Attachment: Port of Entry of
Indianapolis—Proposed Limits.’’ The
revised port of entry description is also
included in Section IV of this
document. The description of the port
limits of Indianapolis, Indiana in 19
CFR 101.3 will be revised to refer to this
document, CBP Dec. 13–13.
IV. Port Description of Indianapolis,
Indiana
The new port limits of Indianapolis,
Indiana, are as follows:
In the State of Indiana, all of Marion
County; that part of Boone County
which is west of Interstate Route 65 and
east of State Route 39; that part of
Hendricks County which is east of State
Route 39; and that part of Johnson
County which is east of State Route 37,
north of State Route 144, and west of
Interstate Route 65.
V. Statutory and Regulatory Reviews
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
DHS does not consider this rule to be
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. The change is intended to
expand the geographical boundaries of
the Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry
and make the boundaries more easily
identifiable to the public. There are no
new costs to the public associated with
this rule, and the rule does not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Sep 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
otherwise implicate the factors set forth
in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, this rule has not been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires federal
agencies to examine the impact a rule
would have on small entities. A small
entity may be a small business (defined
as any independently owned and
operated business not dominant in its
field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small notfor-profit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
This rule merely expands the limits of
an existing port of entry and does not
impose any new costs on the public.
Accordingly, we certify that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
VI. Signing Authority
The signing authority for this
document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a)
because the extension of port limits is
not within the bounds of those
regulations for which the Secretary of
the Treasury has retained sole authority.
Accordingly, this final rule is signed by
the Secretary of Homeland Security.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection,
Customs ports of entry, Exports,
Imports, Organization and functions
(Government agencies).
Amendment to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the NPRM
and the preamble, part 101 of title 19 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as set forth below.
PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The general authority citation for
part 101 is revised and the specific
authority citation for section 101.3
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. 203; 19
U.S.C. 2 & note, 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States), 1623, 1624, 1646a.
Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under
19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
*
*
§ 101.3
*
*
*
[Amended]
2. In § 101.3(b)(1) in the list of ports
of entry under the State of Indiana, add
‘‘CBP Dec. 13–13’’ in the ‘‘Limits of
port’’ column adjacent to the listing of
Indianapolis.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: September 3, 2013.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013–21772 Filed 9–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 404
[Docket No. SSA–2013–0039]
RIN 0960–AH60
Extension of Expiration Dates for Two
Body System Listings
Social Security Administration.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We are extending the
expiration dates of the following body
systems in the Listing of Impairments
(listings) in our regulations:
Genitourinary Impairments and
Hematological Disorders. We are making
no other revisions to these body systems
in this final rule. These extensions will
ensure that we continue to have the
criteria we need to evaluate
impairments in the affected body
systems at step three of the sequential
evaluation processes for initial claims
and continuing disability reviews.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 6, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl A. Williams, Director, Office of
Medical Listings Improvement, 6401
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401, (410) 965–1020. For
information on eligibility or filing for
benefits, call our national toll-free
number, 1–800–772–1213, or TTY 1–
800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We use the listings in appendix 1 to
subpart P of part 404 of 20 CFR at the
third step of the sequential evaluation
process to evaluate claims filed by
adults and children for benefits based
on disability under the title II and title
XVI programs.1 20 CFR 404.1520(d),
416.920(d). The listings are in two parts:
Part A has listings criteria for adults and
Part B has listings criteria for children.
If you are age 18 or over, we apply the
listings criteria in part A when we
assess your impairment or combination
of impairments. If you are under age 18,
1 We also use the listings in the sequential
evaluation processes we use to determine whether
a beneficiary’s disability continues. See 20 CFR
404.1594, 416.994, and 416.994a.
E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM
06SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54755-54756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21772]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. USCBP-2012-0006; CBP Dec. 13-13]
Extension of Port Limits of Indianapolis, IN
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is extending the
geographical limits of the port of entry of Indianapolis, Indiana. This
extension will make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the
public and will allow for uniform and continuous service to the
extended area of Indianapolis, Indiana. The change is part of CBP's
continuing program to use its personnel, facilities, and resources more
efficiently, and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and
the general public.
DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Kaplan, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, by phone at (202) 325-
4543, or by email at Roger.Kaplan@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 24656) on April 25, 2012, CBP proposed to amend the
list of CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) to extend the limits
of the Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry to include all the
territory within the boundaries of Marion County, Indiana, as well as
portions of the neighboring counties of Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson.
This update will allow CBP to better serve the public in the greater
Indianapolis area by providing regular service to municipalities within
Indianapolis that are not technically within the city limits, and to
locations to the immediate west and south of the city. CBP determined
that the proposed boundary changes would not result in a change in the
service that is provided to the public by the port and would not change
the workload at the port or require a change in the staffing at the
port. Further background information is provided in the NPRM.
Interested parties were given until June 25, 2012, to comment on
the proposed changes. CBP received one comment in response to the NPRM.
II. Comment Analysis
Comment: The commenter notes that Indianapolis, Indiana, is
surrounded by
[[Page 54756]]
four other states and recommends that CBP should utilize other
resources, apparently from the surrounding states, to better support
Indianapolis.
Response: CBP is seeking to establish definitive geographic port
limits to make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public
and to allow for uniform and continuous service to the extended area of
Indianapolis, Indiana. This is a no-cost administrative measure and CBP
will not need additional resources to implement the proposed boundary
changes. As specified in the NPRM, the proposed changes will not result
in changes to the workload or staffing levels at the port.
III. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed in the NPRM, CBP is extending the
geographical limits of the port of entry of Indianapolis, Indiana, to
include all the territory within the boundaries of Marion County,
Indiana, as well as portions of the neighboring counties of Boone,
Hendricks, and Johnson. The port of entry description of Indianapolis,
Indiana, will be revised as proposed in the NPRM and set forth in the
map included in the docket as ``Attachment: Port of Entry of
Indianapolis--Proposed Limits.'' The revised port of entry description
is also included in Section IV of this document. The description of the
port limits of Indianapolis, Indiana in 19 CFR 101.3 will be revised to
refer to this document, CBP Dec. 13-13.
IV. Port Description of Indianapolis, Indiana
The new port limits of Indianapolis, Indiana, are as follows:
In the State of Indiana, all of Marion County; that part of Boone
County which is west of Interstate Route 65 and east of State Route 39;
that part of Hendricks County which is east of State Route 39; and that
part of Johnson County which is east of State Route 37, north of State
Route 144, and west of Interstate Route 65.
V. Statutory and Regulatory Reviews
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
DHS does not consider this rule to be a ``significant regulatory
action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. The
change is intended to expand the geographical boundaries of the
Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry and make the boundaries more
easily identifiable to the public. There are no new costs to the public
associated with this rule, and the rule does not otherwise implicate
the factors set forth in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, this rule has not been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget for review.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
federal agencies to examine the impact a rule would have on small
entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
This rule merely expands the limits of an existing port of entry
and does not impose any new costs on the public. Accordingly, we
certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
VI. Signing Authority
The signing authority for this document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a)
because the extension of port limits is not within the bounds of those
regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole
authority. Accordingly, this final rule is signed by the Secretary of
Homeland Security.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Exports,
Imports, Organization and functions (Government agencies).
Amendment to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the NPRM and the preamble, part 101 of
title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth
below.
PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The general authority citation for part 101 is revised and the
specific authority citation for section 101.3 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. 203; 19 U.S.C. 2 & note, 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States), 1623, 1624, 1646a.
Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
* * * * *
Sec. 101.3 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 101.3(b)(1) in the list of ports of entry under the State
of Indiana, add ``CBP Dec. 13-13'' in the ``Limits of port'' column
adjacent to the listing of Indianapolis.
Dated: September 3, 2013.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-21772 Filed 9-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
