Extension of Port Limits of Indianapolis, IN, 54755-54756 [2013-21772]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 54755 SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO PART 748—AUTHORIZATION VALIDATED END-USER (VEU): LIST OF VALIDATED END-USERS, RESPECTIVE ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR EXPORT, REEXPORT AND TRANSFER, AND ELIGIBLE DESTINATIONS Country Eligible items (by ECCN) Validated end-user Federal Register citation Eligible destination Nothing in this Supplement shall be deemed to supersede other provisions in the EAR, including but not limited to § 748.15(c). * * Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd. .................................... * * * * Dated: August 29, 2013. Matthew S. Borman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–21579 Filed 9–5–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–33–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection 19 CFR Part 101 [Docket No. USCBP–2012–0006; CBP Dec. 13–13] ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES Extension of Port Limits of Indianapolis, IN U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is extending the geographical limits of the port of entry SUMMARY: 14:46 Sep 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 of Indianapolis, Indiana. This extension will make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public and will allow for uniform and continuous service to the extended area of Indianapolis, Indiana. The change is part of CBP’s continuing program to use its personnel, facilities, and resources more efficiently, and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Kaplan, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, by phone at (202) 325–4543, or by email at Roger.Kaplan@dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register (77 FR 24656) on April 25, 2012, CBP proposed to amend the list of CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) to extend the limits of the Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry to include all the PO 00000 Frm 00005 * *Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd., No. 109 Huai He Road East, Dalian Economic and Technology Development Area, Dalian, Liao Ning Province, 116600, China. Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * 78 FR [INSERT PAGE NUMBER], 9–6–13. ** Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd., c/o Dalian Kintetsu Logistics Co., Ltd, Dayaowan Bonded Port No. 6 Road W4 Unit A1, Dalian Economic and Technology Development Area, Dalian, Liao Ning Province, 116601, China. * I. Background U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 * * * These items authorized for the Intel destination identified by one asterisk (*): 1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 2B006.b, 2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 3B001 (except for multilayer masks with a phase shift layer designed to produce ‘‘space qualified’’ semiconductor devices), 3C002, 3E002 (excluding development and production technology specific to digital signal processors and digital array processors and further limited to ‘‘technology’’ based on the international technology roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS)), and 4E001(limited to technology for computer products or components not exceeding an adjusted peak performance (APP) level of 12.0 weighted teraflops). These items authorized for the Intel destination identified by two asterisks (**): 1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 2B006.b, 2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 3B001 (except for multilayer masks with a phase shift layer designed to produce ‘‘space qualified’’ semiconductor devices), and 3C002. * * territory within the boundaries of Marion County, Indiana, as well as portions of the neighboring counties of Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson. This update will allow CBP to better serve the public in the greater Indianapolis area by providing regular service to municipalities within Indianapolis that are not technically within the city limits, and to locations to the immediate west and south of the city. CBP determined that the proposed boundary changes would not result in a change in the service that is provided to the public by the port and would not change the workload at the port or require a change in the staffing at the port. Further background information is provided in the NPRM. Interested parties were given until June 25, 2012, to comment on the proposed changes. CBP received one comment in response to the NPRM. II. Comment Analysis Comment: The commenter notes that Indianapolis, Indiana, is surrounded by E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM 06SER1 54756 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations four other states and recommends that CBP should utilize other resources, apparently from the surrounding states, to better support Indianapolis. Response: CBP is seeking to establish definitive geographic port limits to make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public and to allow for uniform and continuous service to the extended area of Indianapolis, Indiana. This is a no-cost administrative measure and CBP will not need additional resources to implement the proposed boundary changes. As specified in the NPRM, the proposed changes will not result in changes to the workload or staffing levels at the port. III. Conclusion For the reasons discussed in the NPRM, CBP is extending the geographical limits of the port of entry of Indianapolis, Indiana, to include all the territory within the boundaries of Marion County, Indiana, as well as portions of the neighboring counties of Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson. The port of entry description of Indianapolis, Indiana, will be revised as proposed in the NPRM and set forth in the map included in the docket as ‘‘Attachment: Port of Entry of Indianapolis—Proposed Limits.’’ The revised port of entry description is also included in Section IV of this document. The description of the port limits of Indianapolis, Indiana in 19 CFR 101.3 will be revised to refer to this document, CBP Dec. 13–13. IV. Port Description of Indianapolis, Indiana The new port limits of Indianapolis, Indiana, are as follows: In the State of Indiana, all of Marion County; that part of Boone County which is west of Interstate Route 65 and east of State Route 39; that part of Hendricks County which is east of State Route 39; and that part of Johnson County which is east of State Route 37, north of State Route 144, and west of Interstate Route 65. V. Statutory and Regulatory Reviews ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 DHS does not consider this rule to be a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. The change is intended to expand the geographical boundaries of the Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry and make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public. There are no new costs to the public associated with this rule, and the rule does not VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:46 Sep 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 otherwise implicate the factors set forth in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires federal agencies to examine the impact a rule would have on small entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small notfor-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000 people). This rule merely expands the limits of an existing port of entry and does not impose any new costs on the public. Accordingly, we certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. VI. Signing Authority The signing authority for this document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a) because the extension of port limits is not within the bounds of those regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole authority. Accordingly, this final rule is signed by the Secretary of Homeland Security. List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101 Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Exports, Imports, Organization and functions (Government agencies). Amendment to the Regulations For the reasons set forth in the NPRM and the preamble, part 101 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth below. PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The general authority citation for part 101 is revised and the specific authority citation for section 101.3 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. 203; 19 U.S.C. 2 & note, 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624, 1646a. Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b; * * § 101.3 * * * [Amended] 2. In § 101.3(b)(1) in the list of ports of entry under the State of Indiana, add ‘‘CBP Dec. 13–13’’ in the ‘‘Limits of port’’ column adjacent to the listing of Indianapolis. ■ PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Dated: September 3, 2013. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2013–21772 Filed 9–5–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 20 CFR Part 404 [Docket No. SSA–2013–0039] RIN 0960–AH60 Extension of Expiration Dates for Two Body System Listings Social Security Administration. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: We are extending the expiration dates of the following body systems in the Listing of Impairments (listings) in our regulations: Genitourinary Impairments and Hematological Disorders. We are making no other revisions to these body systems in this final rule. These extensions will ensure that we continue to have the criteria we need to evaluate impairments in the affected body systems at step three of the sequential evaluation processes for initial claims and continuing disability reviews. DATES: This final rule is effective on September 6, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl A. Williams, Director, Office of Medical Listings Improvement, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, (410) 965–1020. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1–800–772–1213, or TTY 1– 800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at https:// www.socialsecurity.gov. SUMMARY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background We use the listings in appendix 1 to subpart P of part 404 of 20 CFR at the third step of the sequential evaluation process to evaluate claims filed by adults and children for benefits based on disability under the title II and title XVI programs.1 20 CFR 404.1520(d), 416.920(d). The listings are in two parts: Part A has listings criteria for adults and Part B has listings criteria for children. If you are age 18 or over, we apply the listings criteria in part A when we assess your impairment or combination of impairments. If you are under age 18, 1 We also use the listings in the sequential evaluation processes we use to determine whether a beneficiary’s disability continues. See 20 CFR 404.1594, 416.994, and 416.994a. E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM 06SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54755-54756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21772]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

19 CFR Part 101

[Docket No. USCBP-2012-0006; CBP Dec. 13-13]


Extension of Port Limits of Indianapolis, IN

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is extending the 
geographical limits of the port of entry of Indianapolis, Indiana. This 
extension will make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the 
public and will allow for uniform and continuous service to the 
extended area of Indianapolis, Indiana. The change is part of CBP's 
continuing program to use its personnel, facilities, and resources more 
efficiently, and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and 
the general public.

DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Kaplan, Office of Field 
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, by phone at (202) 325-
4543, or by email at Roger.Kaplan@dhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal 
Register (77 FR 24656) on April 25, 2012, CBP proposed to amend the 
list of CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) to extend the limits 
of the Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry to include all the 
territory within the boundaries of Marion County, Indiana, as well as 
portions of the neighboring counties of Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson. 
This update will allow CBP to better serve the public in the greater 
Indianapolis area by providing regular service to municipalities within 
Indianapolis that are not technically within the city limits, and to 
locations to the immediate west and south of the city. CBP determined 
that the proposed boundary changes would not result in a change in the 
service that is provided to the public by the port and would not change 
the workload at the port or require a change in the staffing at the 
port. Further background information is provided in the NPRM.
    Interested parties were given until June 25, 2012, to comment on 
the proposed changes. CBP received one comment in response to the NPRM.

II. Comment Analysis

    Comment: The commenter notes that Indianapolis, Indiana, is 
surrounded by

[[Page 54756]]

four other states and recommends that CBP should utilize other 
resources, apparently from the surrounding states, to better support 
Indianapolis.
    Response: CBP is seeking to establish definitive geographic port 
limits to make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public 
and to allow for uniform and continuous service to the extended area of 
Indianapolis, Indiana. This is a no-cost administrative measure and CBP 
will not need additional resources to implement the proposed boundary 
changes. As specified in the NPRM, the proposed changes will not result 
in changes to the workload or staffing levels at the port.

III. Conclusion

    For the reasons discussed in the NPRM, CBP is extending the 
geographical limits of the port of entry of Indianapolis, Indiana, to 
include all the territory within the boundaries of Marion County, 
Indiana, as well as portions of the neighboring counties of Boone, 
Hendricks, and Johnson. The port of entry description of Indianapolis, 
Indiana, will be revised as proposed in the NPRM and set forth in the 
map included in the docket as ``Attachment: Port of Entry of 
Indianapolis--Proposed Limits.'' The revised port of entry description 
is also included in Section IV of this document. The description of the 
port limits of Indianapolis, Indiana in 19 CFR 101.3 will be revised to 
refer to this document, CBP Dec. 13-13.

IV. Port Description of Indianapolis, Indiana

    The new port limits of Indianapolis, Indiana, are as follows:
    In the State of Indiana, all of Marion County; that part of Boone 
County which is west of Interstate Route 65 and east of State Route 39; 
that part of Hendricks County which is east of State Route 39; and that 
part of Johnson County which is east of State Route 37, north of State 
Route 144, and west of Interstate Route 65.

V. Statutory and Regulatory Reviews

A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    DHS does not consider this rule to be a ``significant regulatory 
action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 
Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. The 
change is intended to expand the geographical boundaries of the 
Indianapolis, Indiana, port of entry and make the boundaries more 
easily identifiable to the public. There are no new costs to the public 
associated with this rule, and the rule does not otherwise implicate 
the factors set forth in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, this rule has not been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget for review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires 
federal agencies to examine the impact a rule would have on small 
entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any 
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field 
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small 
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction 
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
    This rule merely expands the limits of an existing port of entry 
and does not impose any new costs on the public. Accordingly, we 
certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.

VI. Signing Authority

    The signing authority for this document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a) 
because the extension of port limits is not within the bounds of those 
regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole 
authority. Accordingly, this final rule is signed by the Secretary of 
Homeland Security.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101

    Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Exports, 
Imports, Organization and functions (Government agencies).

Amendment to the Regulations

    For the reasons set forth in the NPRM and the preamble, part 101 of 
title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth 
below.

PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS

0
1. The general authority citation for part 101 is revised and the 
specific authority citation for section 101.3 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301; 6 U.S.C. 203; 19 U.S.C. 2 & note, 66, 
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States), 1623, 1624, 1646a.

    Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
* * * * *

Sec.  101.3  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  101.3(b)(1) in the list of ports of entry under the State 
of Indiana, add ``CBP Dec. 13-13'' in the ``Limits of port'' column 
adjacent to the listing of Indianapolis.

    Dated: September 3, 2013.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-21772 Filed 9-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P