Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 54377-54380 [2013-21071]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
1821(d)(15)(D), and paragraph (d) of this
section shall be satisfied if the transferee
agrees that it will not destroy such
records for at least six years from the
date the FDIC was appointed as receiver
of such failed insured depository
institution unless otherwise notified in
writing by the FDIC.
(f) Policies and procedures. The FDIC
may establish policies and procedures
with respect to the retention and
destruction of records that are
consistent with this section.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
August, 2013.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1405;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Discussion
AGENCY:
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on February 26, 2013 (78 FR
12988). The NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the aviation
authority for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012–0175,
dated September 7, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports that certain
trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuators
(THSA) were found with corrosion that
affected the ballscrew lower splines
between the tie-bar and screw-jack. This
AD requires repetitive inspections of the
THSA; ballscrew integrity tests, if
necessary; and replacement of affected
THSAs. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct corrosion in the ballscrew
lower splines, which, if the ballscrew
ruptured, could lead to transmission of
THSA torque loads from the ballscrew
to the tie-bar, prompting THSA
blowback, and possible loss of control of
the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
October 9, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of October 9, 2013.
Some Trimmable Horizontal Stabilizer
Actuators (THSA), Part Number (P/N) 47147–
500 fitted on A330/A340 aeroplanes have
been found with corrosion, affecting the
ballscrew lower splines between the tie bar
and the screw-jack. The affected ballscrew is
made of steel and anti-corrosion protection is
ensured, except on both extremities (upper
and lower splines) where Molykote is
applied.
The results of the technical investigations
have identified that the corrosion was caused
by a combination of:
—contact/friction between the tie bar and the
inner surface of the ballscrew leading to
the removal of Molykote (corrosion
protection) at the level of the tie bar
splines,
—humidity ingress initiating surface
oxidation starting from areas where
Molykote is removed, and
—water retention in THSA lower part leading
to corrosion spread out and to the creation
of a brown deposit (iron oxide).
The results of the technical investigations
have also concluded that A320 family THSA
P/N 47145–XXX (where XXX stands for any
numerical value) ballscrews might be
affected by this corrosion issue.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, may lead, in case of ballscrew
rupture, to loss of transmission of THSA
torque loads from the ballscrew to the tie-bar,
[FR Doc. 2013–21389 Filed 9–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0094; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–160–AD; Amendment
39–17573; AD 2013–17–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:42 Sep 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54377
prompting THSA blowback, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires repetitive detailed
inspections of the ballscrew lower splines of
THSAs having P/N 47145–XXX to detect
corrosion and, depending on findings, the
accomplishment of applicable corrective
actions.
The required actions are repetitive
detailed inspections of the gaps between
the ballscrew shaft and tie-rod splines of
the affected THSAs to determine the
corrosion category. Depending on the
corrosion category, additional actions
include a ballscrew shaft integrity test
and replacing the THSA if necessary.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
Requests To Allow Replacement of a
THSA With a Part That Is Not New
Delta Airlines (DAL) and United
Airlines (UAL) requested that paragraph
(i) of the NPRM (78 FR 12988, February
26, 2013) be revised to delete the word
‘‘new’’ so a part other than a new part
could be used to replace an affected
THSA. DAL requested that the
replacement requirements be changed to
allow for the installation of a THSA unit
overhauled using the instructions in the
applicable Goodrich component
maintenance manual instead of a new
THSA part. DAL stated that if Type I or
Type II corrosion is found on an affected
THSA, the corroded ballscrew and claw
(end stop) could be easily replaced if the
guidance in the applicable Goodrich
component maintenance manual is
followed. DAL suggested that replacing
the ballscrew and the claw would
restore the integrity and the level of
safety of the assembly. DAL also pointed
out that obtaining a new THSA may be
difficult because demand may outpace
supply and airplanes might be grounded
while waiting for parts.
UAL stated that it is not necessary to
replace an affected THSA with a brand
new THSA and that any THSA
inspected in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1214,
including Appendix 01, dated February
23, 2012, that is determined to have
Type I corrosion (i.e., no corrosion),
should be acceptable as a replacement
part.
We agree with both commenters’
statements that affected THSAs do not
need to be replaced with new parts. Our
intent is that an affected THSA is
replaced with a part that meets the
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
54378
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
criteria specified in paragraph (l) of this
final rule. We revised paragraphs (i)(1),
(i)(2), and (i)(3) of this final rule to
remove the word ‘‘new’’ and to state to
replace an affected THSA with a THSA
that meets the criteria specified in
paragraph (l) of this final rule.
We do not agree with DAL’s request
to allow for the installation of a THSA
unit that was overhauled using the
applicable Goodrich component
maintenance manual. We do not have a
way to determine if an overhauled
THSA is airworthy. We also disagree
with UAL’s recommendation that any
THSA inspected in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1214,
including Appendix 01, dated February
23, 2012, that is determined to have
Type I corrosion, should be acceptable
as a replacement part. In addition to the
inspection requirement in paragraph (h)
of this final rule, we must ensure that
a THSA utilized as a replacement part
meets the applicable requirements in
paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD.
No change was made to this final rule
in this regard. However, we have
revised paragraph (l) of this final rule to
provide clarification of the criteria for
parts installation.
Request To Reference Revised Vendor
Service Information
Airbus requested that paragraphs (g),
(h), and (i) of the NPRM (78 FR 12988,
February 26, 2013) be revised to
reference the current revision of the
Goodrich service information. Goodrich
has issued Service Bulletin 47145–27–
16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013.
Airbus noted that the definition of
THSA first flight was changed in
Revision 2 of Goodrich Service Bulletin
47145–27–16, dated January 7, 2013,
and requested that paragraph (g) of the
NPRM be revised to include this
definition. Airbus also requested that
credit be given for actions that were
accomplished before the effective date
of this final rule using Goodrich Service
Bulletin 47145–27–16, dated November
7, 2011; and Revision 1, dated August
1, 2012.
We agree with the commenter’s
requests and have revised paragraphs
(g), (h), and (i) of this final rule to
reference Goodrich Service Bulletin
47145–27–16, Revision 2, dated January
7, 2013. We have also revised the
definition of THSA first flight in
paragraph (g) of this final rule to include
the information provided in Goodrich
Service Bulletin 47145–27–16, Revision
2, dated January 7, 2013. In addition, we
included a new paragraph (m) to
provide credit for actions done prior to
the effective date of this AD using
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:42 Sep 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145–27–16,
dated November 7, 2011; or Revision 1,
dated August 1, 2012; and reidentified
the subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 12988,
February 26, 2013).
Request To Clarify When Repetitive
Inspections of THSAs Should Start
UAL stated that the intent of
paragraph (l)(2) of the NPRM (78 FR
12988, February 26, 2013) should be
clarified to indicate that only THSAs
with more than 20 years accumulated
since first flight need to be inspected as
required by paragraph (h) of the NPRM.
UAL also asked if a THSA should
accumulate 20 years since first flight
before an operator must begin doing the
repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (h) of the NPRM.
We agree that clarification is
necessary. As discussed previously, we
revised paragraph (l) of this final rule,
in part, to clarify that only THSAs that
have accumulated 20 years or more
since first flight are required to be
inspected repetitively, as required by
paragraph (h) of this final rule.
Paragraph (h) of this final rule requires
an initial inspection of the THSAs
within 22 years accumulated by the
THSA since the THSA’s first flight, but
no earlier than 20 years accumulated by
the THSA since its first flight, or within
three months after the effective date of
this final rule, and subsequent repetitive
inspections at intervals not to exceed 24
months.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 755
products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 4 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $256,700, or $340 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 15 work-hours and require parts
costing $2,203, for a cost of $3,478 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Request To Revise Reporting
Requirement
UAL requested that the reporting
requirement in paragraph (k) of the
NPRM (78 FR 12988, February 26, 2013)
be deleted if an inspection finding
reveals that the THSA has Type I
corrosion (i.e., no corrosion). UAL
stated that only findings of Type II and
Type III corrosion should be reported.
We disagree that only findings of
Type II and Type III corrosion should be
reported. Airbus has not determined
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by this final rule,
and reports of Type I corrosion will be
a factor in Airbus’s decision. No change
was made to this final rule.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR
12988, February 26, 2013) for correcting
the unsafe condition; and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
required by this AD is 2120–0056. The
paperwork cost associated with this AD
has been detailed in the Costs of
Compliance section of this document
and includes time for reviewing
instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the FAA at 800
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20591. ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the MCAI, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:42 Sep 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
2013–17–09 Airbus: Amendment 39–17573.
Docket No. FAA–2013–0094; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–160–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective October 9, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318–
111, –112, –121, and –122 airplanes; Airbus
Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115,
–131, –132, and –133 airplanes; Airbus
Model A320–111, –211, –212, –214, –231,
–232, and –233 airplanes; and Airbus Model
A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, –213,
–231, and –232 airplanes; certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27, Flight controls.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports that
certain trimmable horizontal stabilizer
actuators (THSA) were found with corrosion
that affected the ballscrew lower splines
between the tie-bar and screw-jack. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
corrosion in the ballscrew lower splines,
which, if the ballscrew ruptured, could lead
to transmission of THSA torque loads from
the ballscrew to the tie-bar, prompting THSA
blowback, and possible loss of control of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Definition of THSA First Flight
For the purposes of this AD, the definition
of THSA first flight is the THSA ‘‘entry into
service date,’’ which is the date of the first
flight of the airplane on which the THSA was
originally fitted in production. All entry into
service dates are included in the table that
appears after the Accomplishment
Instructions in Goodrich Service Bulletin
47145–27–16, Revision 2, dated January 7,
2013. If the entry into service date is not
included in this table, use the manufacturing
date engraved on the THSA’s identification
plate as the ‘‘entry into service date.’’
(h) Repetitive Inspections
At the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the gaps between the
ballscrew shaft and tie-rod splines on any
THSA having P/N 47145–XXX (where XXX
stands for any numerical value) to determine
if the corrosion category is Type I, Type II,
or Type III, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1214, including
Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012; and
the Accomplishment Instructions and the
flowchart following the Accomplishment
Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin
47145–27–16, Revision 2, dated January 7,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54379
2013. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 24 months.
(1) Within 22 years accumulated by the
THSA since the THSA’s first flight, but no
earlier than 20 years accumulated by the
THSA since its first flight.
(2) Within three months after the effective
date of this AD.
(i) Ballscrew Integrity Test and Corrective
Actions
If, during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, it is determined that
a THSA has Type II or Type III corrosion:
Before further flight, do a ballscrew integrity
test, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
27–1214, including Appendix 01, dated
February 23, 2012; and the Accomplishment
Instructions and the flowchart following the
Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich
Service Bulletin 47145–27–16, Revision 2,
dated January 7, 2013. If Type I corrosion is
found, no action is required by this
paragraph.
(1) For THSAs having Type II or Type III
corrosion and for which the results of the
ballscrew integrity test are not correct, as
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
27–1214, including Appendix 01, dated
February 23, 2012: Before further flight,
replace the affected THSA with a THSA that
meets the criteria specified in paragraph (l)
of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1214, including
Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012.
(2) For THSAs having Type III corrosion
and on which the results of the ballscrew
integrity test are correct, as specified in
Airbus Service Bulletin A320 27–1214,
including Appendix 01, dated February 23,
2012: Within 10 days after the most recent
inspection, replace the THSA with a THSA
that meets the criteria specified in paragraph
(l) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1214, including
Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012.
(3) For THSAs having Type II corrosion
and on which the results of the ballscrew
integrity test are correct, as specified in
Airbus Service Bulletin A320 27–1214,
including Appendix 01, dated February 23,
2012: Within 24 months or 5,000 flight cycles
after the most recent inspection, whichever
occurs first, replace the THSA with a THSA
that meets the criteria specified in paragraph
(l) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1214, including
Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012.
(j) Replacement of a THSA is not
Terminating Action
Replacement of a THSA, as required by
paragraph (i) of this AD, does not constitute
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (h) of this
AD.
(k) Reporting Requirement
If any corrosion type is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD, report
the findings to Airbus, Customer Services
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
54380
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Engineering—SEEL5, Flight Control Systems
A320 Family, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61
93 44 25. The report must include the
information specified in Appendix 01 of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–27–1214.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Within 90 days
after that inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Within 90 days after
the effective date of this AD.
(l) Parts Installation Limitations
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a THSA having P/N
47145–XXX (where XXX stands for any
numerical value) on any airplane, unless that
THSA meets the applicable criteria specified
in paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD.
(1) The THSA must not have accumulated
20 years or more since the THSA’s first flight,
and after installation must be inspected as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the
later of the times specified in paragraphs
(h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, and be inspected
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24
months as required by paragraph (h) of this
AD; and any applicable actions specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD must be
accomplished.
(2) If the THSA has accumulated 20 years
or more since the THSA’s first flight, it must
have been inspected before installation as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD and
determined to have Type I corrosion (if the
screw shaft lower splines thread condition
does not meet the Type II or Type III
condition), and be inspected thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 24 months as required
by paragraph (h) of this AD; and any
applicable actions specified in paragraph (i)
of this AD must be accomplished.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(m) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Goodrich
Service Bulletin 47145–27–16, dated
November 7, 2011; or Revision 1, dated
August 1, 2012.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:42 Sep 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing, and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(o) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to
a location where the airplane can be
modified (if the operator elects to do so),
provided that, if any THSA corrosion is
found during any action required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, that corrosion is
classified as Type I or Type II, as defined in
Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145–27–16,
dated November 7, 2011; Revision 1, dated
August 1, 2012; or Revision 2, dated January
27, 2013.
(p) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information European
Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2012–0175, dated September 7,
2012, for related information, which can be
found in the AD docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
(q) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–27–1214,
including Appendix 01, dated February 23,
2012.
(ii) Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145–27–
16, dated November 7, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(iii) Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145–27–
16, Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012. Pages
1 through 4 of this document are identified
as Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012. Pages 5
through 117 of this document are dated
November 7, 2011.
(iv) Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145–27–
16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. Pages
1, 2, and 4 of this document are identified
as Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012. Page 3
of this document is identified as Revision 2,
dated January 7, 2013. Pages 5 through 117
of this document are dated November 7,
2011.
(3) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33
5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
For Goodrich service information identified
in this AD, contact Goodrich Corporation,
Actuation Systems, Stafford Road,
Fordhouses, Wolverhampton WV10 7EH,
England; telephone +44 (0) 1902 624938; fax
+44 (0) 1902 788100; email
techpubs.wolverhampton@goodrich.com;
Internet https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
23, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–21071 Filed 9–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0240; Directorate
Identifier 2011–SW–060–AD; Amendment
39–17565; AD 2013–17–01]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model
AS350 and AS355 helicopters. This AD
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04SER1.SGM
04SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 4, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54377-54380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21071]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0094; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-160-AD;
Amendment 39-17573; AD 2013-17-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports that certain trimmable horizontal stabilizer
actuators (THSA) were found with corrosion that affected the ballscrew
lower splines between the tie-bar and screw-jack. This AD requires
repetitive inspections of the THSA; ballscrew integrity tests, if
necessary; and replacement of affected THSAs. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct corrosion in the ballscrew lower splines, which, if
the ballscrew ruptured, could lead to transmission of THSA torque loads
from the ballscrew to the tie-bar, prompting THSA blowback, and
possible loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective October 9, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 9,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1405;
fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2013 (78
FR 12988). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the aviation authority for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012-0175, dated
September 7, 2012 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
Some Trimmable Horizontal Stabilizer Actuators (THSA), Part
Number (P/N) 47147-500 fitted on A330/A340 aeroplanes have been
found with corrosion, affecting the ballscrew lower splines between
the tie bar and the screw-jack. The affected ballscrew is made of
steel and anti-corrosion protection is ensured, except on both
extremities (upper and lower splines) where Molykote is applied.
The results of the technical investigations have identified that
the corrosion was caused by a combination of:
--contact/friction between the tie bar and the inner surface of the
ballscrew leading to the removal of Molykote (corrosion protection)
at the level of the tie bar splines,
--humidity ingress initiating surface oxidation starting from areas
where Molykote is removed, and
--water retention in THSA lower part leading to corrosion spread out
and to the creation of a brown deposit (iron oxide).
The results of the technical investigations have also concluded
that A320 family THSA P/N 47145-XXX (where XXX stands for any
numerical value) ballscrews might be affected by this corrosion
issue.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead, in case
of ballscrew rupture, to loss of transmission of THSA torque loads
from the ballscrew to the tie-bar, prompting THSA blowback, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections of the ballscrew lower splines of
THSAs having P/N 47145-XXX to detect corrosion and, depending on
findings, the accomplishment of applicable corrective actions.
The required actions are repetitive detailed inspections of the gaps
between the ballscrew shaft and tie-rod splines of the affected THSAs
to determine the corrosion category. Depending on the corrosion
category, additional actions include a ballscrew shaft integrity test
and replacing the THSA if necessary. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Requests To Allow Replacement of a THSA With a Part That Is Not New
Delta Airlines (DAL) and United Airlines (UAL) requested that
paragraph (i) of the NPRM (78 FR 12988, February 26, 2013) be revised
to delete the word ``new'' so a part other than a new part could be
used to replace an affected THSA. DAL requested that the replacement
requirements be changed to allow for the installation of a THSA unit
overhauled using the instructions in the applicable Goodrich component
maintenance manual instead of a new THSA part. DAL stated that if Type
I or Type II corrosion is found on an affected THSA, the corroded
ballscrew and claw (end stop) could be easily replaced if the guidance
in the applicable Goodrich component maintenance manual is followed.
DAL suggested that replacing the ballscrew and the claw would restore
the integrity and the level of safety of the assembly. DAL also pointed
out that obtaining a new THSA may be difficult because demand may
outpace supply and airplanes might be grounded while waiting for parts.
UAL stated that it is not necessary to replace an affected THSA
with a brand new THSA and that any THSA inspected in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-
1214, including Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012, that is
determined to have Type I corrosion (i.e., no corrosion), should be
acceptable as a replacement part.
We agree with both commenters' statements that affected THSAs do
not need to be replaced with new parts. Our intent is that an affected
THSA is replaced with a part that meets the
[[Page 54378]]
criteria specified in paragraph (l) of this final rule. We revised
paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this final rule to remove the
word ``new'' and to state to replace an affected THSA with a THSA that
meets the criteria specified in paragraph (l) of this final rule.
We do not agree with DAL's request to allow for the installation of
a THSA unit that was overhauled using the applicable Goodrich component
maintenance manual. We do not have a way to determine if an overhauled
THSA is airworthy. We also disagree with UAL's recommendation that any
THSA inspected in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1214, including Appendix 01, dated
February 23, 2012, that is determined to have Type I corrosion, should
be acceptable as a replacement part. In addition to the inspection
requirement in paragraph (h) of this final rule, we must ensure that a
THSA utilized as a replacement part meets the applicable requirements
in paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD. No change was made to this
final rule in this regard. However, we have revised paragraph (l) of
this final rule to provide clarification of the criteria for parts
installation.
Request To Reference Revised Vendor Service Information
Airbus requested that paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of the NPRM (78
FR 12988, February 26, 2013) be revised to reference the current
revision of the Goodrich service information. Goodrich has issued
Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. Airbus
noted that the definition of THSA first flight was changed in Revision
2 of Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, dated January 7, 2013, and
requested that paragraph (g) of the NPRM be revised to include this
definition. Airbus also requested that credit be given for actions that
were accomplished before the effective date of this final rule using
Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, dated November 7, 2011; and
Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012.
We agree with the commenter's requests and have revised paragraphs
(g), (h), and (i) of this final rule to reference Goodrich Service
Bulletin 47145-27-16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. We have also
revised the definition of THSA first flight in paragraph (g) of this
final rule to include the information provided in Goodrich Service
Bulletin 47145-27-16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. In addition,
we included a new paragraph (m) to provide credit for actions done
prior to the effective date of this AD using Goodrich Service Bulletin
47145-27-16, dated November 7, 2011; or Revision 1, dated August 1,
2012; and reidentified the subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
Request To Clarify When Repetitive Inspections of THSAs Should Start
UAL stated that the intent of paragraph (l)(2) of the NPRM (78 FR
12988, February 26, 2013) should be clarified to indicate that only
THSAs with more than 20 years accumulated since first flight need to be
inspected as required by paragraph (h) of the NPRM. UAL also asked if a
THSA should accumulate 20 years since first flight before an operator
must begin doing the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h)
of the NPRM.
We agree that clarification is necessary. As discussed previously,
we revised paragraph (l) of this final rule, in part, to clarify that
only THSAs that have accumulated 20 years or more since first flight
are required to be inspected repetitively, as required by paragraph (h)
of this final rule. Paragraph (h) of this final rule requires an
initial inspection of the THSAs within 22 years accumulated by the THSA
since the THSA's first flight, but no earlier than 20 years accumulated
by the THSA since its first flight, or within three months after the
effective date of this final rule, and subsequent repetitive
inspections at intervals not to exceed 24 months.
Request To Revise Reporting Requirement
UAL requested that the reporting requirement in paragraph (k) of
the NPRM (78 FR 12988, February 26, 2013) be deleted if an inspection
finding reveals that the THSA has Type I corrosion (i.e., no
corrosion). UAL stated that only findings of Type II and Type III
corrosion should be reported.
We disagree that only findings of Type II and Type III corrosion
should be reported. Airbus has not determined terminating action for
the repetitive inspections required by this final rule, and reports of
Type I corrosion will be a factor in Airbus's decision. No change was
made to this final rule.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 12988, February 26, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 12988, February 26, 2013).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 755 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 4 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $256,700, or $340 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 15 work-hours and require parts costing $2,203, for a cost
of $3,478 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA
at 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591. ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation
[[Page 54379]]
is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in
this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the MCAI, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2013-17-09 Airbus: Amendment 39-17573. Docket No. FAA-2013-0094;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-160-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October 9,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -
122 airplanes; Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131,
-132, and -133 airplanes; Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -
231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Airbus Model A321-111, -112, -
131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes; certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports that certain trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuators (THSA) were found with corrosion
that affected the ballscrew lower splines between the tie-bar and
screw-jack. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion
in the ballscrew lower splines, which, if the ballscrew ruptured,
could lead to transmission of THSA torque loads from the ballscrew
to the tie-bar, prompting THSA blowback, and possible loss of
control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Definition of THSA First Flight
For the purposes of this AD, the definition of THSA first flight
is the THSA ``entry into service date,'' which is the date of the
first flight of the airplane on which the THSA was originally fitted
in production. All entry into service dates are included in the
table that appears after the Accomplishment Instructions in Goodrich
Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. If
the entry into service date is not included in this table, use the
manufacturing date engraved on the THSA's identification plate as
the ``entry into service date.''
(h) Repetitive Inspections
At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the gaps between the
ballscrew shaft and tie-rod splines on any THSA having P/N 47145-XXX
(where XXX stands for any numerical value) to determine if the
corrosion category is Type I, Type II, or Type III, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-27-1214, including Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012; and
the Accomplishment Instructions and the flowchart following the
Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-
16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months.
(1) Within 22 years accumulated by the THSA since the THSA's
first flight, but no earlier than 20 years accumulated by the THSA
since its first flight.
(2) Within three months after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Ballscrew Integrity Test and Corrective Actions
If, during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD,
it is determined that a THSA has Type II or Type III corrosion:
Before further flight, do a ballscrew integrity test, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-27-1214, including Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012; and
the Accomplishment Instructions and the flowchart following the
Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-
16, Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. If Type I corrosion is found,
no action is required by this paragraph.
(1) For THSAs having Type II or Type III corrosion and for which
the results of the ballscrew integrity test are not correct, as
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1214, including
Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012: Before further flight, replace
the affected THSA with a THSA that meets the criteria specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1214, including
Appendix 01, dated February 23, 2012.
(2) For THSAs having Type III corrosion and on which the results
of the ballscrew integrity test are correct, as specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320 27-1214, including Appendix 01, dated February
23, 2012: Within 10 days after the most recent inspection, replace
the THSA with a THSA that meets the criteria specified in paragraph
(l) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1214, including Appendix 01,
dated February 23, 2012.
(3) For THSAs having Type II corrosion and on which the results
of the ballscrew integrity test are correct, as specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320 27-1214, including Appendix 01, dated February
23, 2012: Within 24 months or 5,000 flight cycles after the most
recent inspection, whichever occurs first, replace the THSA with a
THSA that meets the criteria specified in paragraph (l) of this AD,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-27-1214, including Appendix 01, dated February 23,
2012.
(j) Replacement of a THSA is not Terminating Action
Replacement of a THSA, as required by paragraph (i) of this AD,
does not constitute terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (h) of this AD.
(k) Reporting Requirement
If any corrosion type is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD, report the findings to
Airbus, Customer Services
[[Page 54380]]
Engineering--SEEL5, Flight Control Systems A320 Family, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 44
25. The report must include the information specified in Appendix 01
of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1214.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Within 90 days after that inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
(l) Parts Installation Limitations
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
THSA having P/N 47145-XXX (where XXX stands for any numerical value)
on any airplane, unless that THSA meets the applicable criteria
specified in paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD.
(1) The THSA must not have accumulated 20 years or more since
the THSA's first flight, and after installation must be inspected as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, and be
inspected thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD; and any applicable actions
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD must be accomplished.
(2) If the THSA has accumulated 20 years or more since the
THSA's first flight, it must have been inspected before installation
as required by paragraph (h) of this AD and determined to have Type
I corrosion (if the screw shaft lower splines thread condition does
not meet the Type II or Type III condition), and be inspected
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD; and any applicable actions specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD must be accomplished.
(m) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Goodrich Service Bulletin
47145-27-16, dated November 7, 2011; or Revision 1, dated August 1,
2012.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 227-1405; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing, and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
(o) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections
21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the airplane
can be modified (if the operator elects to do so), provided that, if
any THSA corrosion is found during any action required by paragraph
(h) of this AD, that corrosion is classified as Type I or Type II,
as defined in Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, dated November
7, 2011; Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012; or Revision 2, dated
January 27, 2013.
(p) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information European
Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2012-0175, dated
September 7, 2012, for related information, which can be found in
the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
(q) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1214, including Appendix 01,
dated February 23, 2012.
(ii) Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, dated November 7,
2011.
(iii) Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, Revision 1, dated
August 1, 2012. Pages 1 through 4 of this document are identified as
Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012. Pages 5 through 117 of this
document are dated November 7, 2011.
(iv) Goodrich Service Bulletin 47145-27-16, Revision 2, dated
January 7, 2013. Pages 1, 2, and 4 of this document are identified
as Revision 1, dated August 1, 2012. Page 3 of this document is
identified as Revision 2, dated January 7, 2013. Pages 5 through 117
of this document are dated November 7, 2011.
(3) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. For Goodrich service information
identified in this AD, contact Goodrich Corporation, Actuation
Systems, Stafford Road, Fordhouses, Wolverhampton WV10 7EH, England;
telephone +44 (0) 1902 624938; fax +44 (0) 1902 788100; email
techpubs.wolverhampton@goodrich.com; Internet https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 23, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-21071 Filed 9-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P