Entergy Operations, Inc., River Bend Station, Unit 1; Exemption, 53482-53483 [2013-21103]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
53482
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Notices
Effective regulatory cooperation is
about more than just regulations. It is
possible that identical regulations could
still contain duplicative requirements
and verifications that hinder trade and
increase costs. Regulatory cooperation
must consider all facets of the regulatory
system including regulatory policy,
related programs and guidance,
inspection and testing methods, and
compliance and enforcement activities.
Work on the initial Regulatory
Cooperation Council (RCC) Action Plan
has helped to identify a number of areas
where we believe deeper cooperation
would generate significant benefit for
regulated parties, citizens, and
regulators. For example:
Standard Setting: aligning standards
or sharing information concerning the
standards development activities in
which regulators will play an active
role.
Product Reviews and Approvals: joint
applications and aligned requirements,
sharing in work to inform approvals.
Reliance on Outcomes of the Other
Regulatory System: working together in
advancing regulatory systems to achieve
common outcomes, and then increasing
reliance on the work conducted in the
other jurisdiction.
Managing 3rd Country Import Risk:
coordinating import programs and
sharing information about third country
technical requirements, increasing our
reliance on assessment and inspection
work done off-shore by the other
country and at our external borders at
the point of first entry into Canada or
the United States.
Improving Confidence in Conformity
Assessment: aligning conformity
assessment practices, and reliance on
international conformity assessment
standards and acceptance mechanisms
to achieve greater confidence in
inspection and testing results.
The current range of authorities,
policies, and administrative practices
that support strong regulatory systems
in the United States and Canada were
developed in a much less integrated
time. In order to maintain the strength
of these systems and to meet the
realities and expectations of Canadian
and American citizens and industry,
new and increased levels of cooperation
must be considered. We therefore ask
that comments and suggestions consider
the full range of cooperation
possibilities.
The objective is to make regulatory
cooperation a cornerstone of an
enhanced regulatory relationship
between Canada and the United States,
while leveraging the expertise and
efforts of regulators in each country. We
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
welcome stakeholder input on
considerations for ongoing alignment.
Howard A. Shelanski,
Administrator, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2013–21061 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–458; NRC–2013–0190]
Entergy Operations, Inc., River Bend
Station, Unit 1; Exemption
1.0 Background
Entergy Operations Inc. (Entergy, the
licensee) is the holder of Facility
Operating License No. NPF–47, which
authorizes operation of the River Bend
Station, Unit 1 (RBS). The license
provides, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a boiling-water
reactor located in West Feliciana Parish,
Louisiana.
2.0 Request/Action
Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), appendix
J, ‘‘Primary Reactor Containment
Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power
Reactors,’’ requires that components
which penetrate containment be
periodically leak tested at the ‘‘Pa,’’
defined as the ‘‘calculated peak
containment internal pressure related to
the design basis accident specified
either in the technical specification or
associated bases.’’ In October 2011,
Entergy was contacted by the NRC
concerning the station’s use of the
appendix J definition of Pa. The NRC
noted a conflict between Entergy’s
interpretation of that definition of Pa
and the literal reading of the definition
of Pa in the regulations. Entergy stated
it was defining Pa based on the longterm calculated pressure peak for the
containment as a whole and not on the
short-term localized pressure spike in
wetwell.
By letter dated August 23, 2012
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML12241A250), Entergy
submitted a request for an exemption
from the definition of the Pa as stated in
10 CFR part 50, appendix J, and
substitute an alternate definition. The
value of Pa is determined by calculating
the pressure response in containment
over time after a main steam line break.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The original containment analysis for
RBS had determined Pa to be 7.6 pounds
per square inch gauge (psig). In July
1999, RBS submitted a license
amendment request to increase the
licensed thermal power of the station by
5 percent from 2,894 megawatts thermal
(MWth) to 3,039 MWth. As part of the
extended power uprate review, new
calculations were performed and
determined that a localized pressure
spike in the wetwell occurs within a few
seconds of the accident and with a
pressure peak at 9.3 psig. However, the
localized pressure in the wetwell
quickly drops by several psig as the
pressure equalizes throughout
containment. This calculation also
determined that the long-term peak
containment pressure is 3.6 psig. To
avoid a large number of procedure
changes, which would be required if the
value was changed, RBS elected to
maintain Pa at the original (pre-extended
power uprate) value of 7.6 psig, which
is conservative to the calculated longterm peak value of 3.6 psig. The
exemption would allow Entergy to
continue to use the previously
calculated value of 7.6 psig for Pa for
RBS instead of the localized pressure
spike in the wetwell calculated value of
9.3 psig.
The NRC staff has concluded that the
use of the alternate definition for Pa
meets the intent of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J because it provides testing of
the primary containment parameters at
a pressure that would exist throughout
containment over the long term
following a design basis accident.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1)
the exemptions are authorized by law,
will not present an undue risk to public
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are
present. The staff accepts the licensee’s
determination that an exemption would
be required to continue to use the
alternate definition of Pa from that
defined in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J.
The NRC staff examined the licensee’s
rationale to support the exemption
request and concluded that the use the
value of 7.6 psig for Pa would meet the
underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J. Supporting the use of this
alternate value is:
(1) The time for the pressure spike to
occur and fall to equilibrium is 6
seconds, which is not sufficient time to
release source terms from the core,
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Notices
(2) the pressure spike is also localized
to the wetwell area which makes up
roughly 10 percent of containment,
(3) the number of containment
penetrations in this area is limited.
Therefore, the current Pa value of 7.6
psig meets the intent of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J by bounding the peak bulk
containment pressure (3.6 psig) and
assuring that leakage through the
primary containment does not exceed
allowable leakage rate values,
(4) the calculated peak bulk
containment pressure is 3.6 psig so the
Technical Specification (TS) value of
7.6 is conservative for the use of
determining containment leakage, and
(5) this request is consistent with the
determination that the NRC staff has
reached for other licensees under
similar conditions based on the same
considerations.
The application for exemption may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC’s Public Document Room, located
at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland 20852. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically
from the ADAMS Public Library
component on the NRC’s Web site,
https://www.nrc.gov (the Electronic
Reading Room).
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes
that requesting exemption under the
special circumstances of 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii) is appropriate and that the
alternate definition of Pa may be used
for the appendix J testing.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow Entergy
to use a Pa value of 7.6 psig for appendix
J testing at the RBS as discussed above.
As stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows
the NRC to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the
licensee’s proposed exemption is in
accordance with the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the exemption is authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and
Safety
The underlying purposes of 10 CFR
part 50, appendix J are stated in section
(I) ‘‘Introduction.’’ The purpose is to
conduct tests to assure that a) leakage
through the primary reactor
containment does not exceed allowable
leakage rate values and b) to conduct
periodic surveillance of reactor
containment penetrations to support
proper maintenance. No new accident
precursors are created because the
testing is conducted at a Pa value
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
calculated to be representative of peak
conditions throughout containment
during a design basis accident. No new
accident precursors are created by use of
a Pa of 7.6 psig instead of 9.3 psig, thus,
the probability of postulated accidents
is not increased. Therefore, there is no
undue risk to public health and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense and
Security
The exemption would permit
exclusion of the short duration spike in
wetwell pressure as Pa for Appendix J
testing purposes. This change to the
interpretation of Pa as defined in
Appendix J has no relation to security
issues. Therefore, the common defense
and security is not impacted by this
exemption.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants Entergy
Operations, Inc., an exemption from the
definition for Pa in 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J for River Bend Station, Unit
1 and alternatively to continue to use a
Pa value of 7.6 psig.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (78 FR 50454;
August 19, 2013).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
of August 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michele G. Evans,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2013–21103 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 052–00025; NRC–2008–0252]
Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and
Acceptance Criteria; Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant, Unit 3
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Determination of inspections,
tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria
(ITAAC) completion.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53483
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) staff has determined
that the inspections, tests, and analyses
have been successfully completed, and
that the specified acceptance criteria are
met for ITAAC E.2.5.04.05.05.02, for the
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Unit 3.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access publicly-available
information related to this action by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ravindra Joshi, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–6191, email: Ravindra.Joshi@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Licensee Notification of Completion of
ITAAC
On May 31, 2013, Southern Nuclear
Operating Company, Inc. (the licensee)
submitted an ITAAC closure
notification (ICN) under § 52.99(c)(1) of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), informing the
NRC that the licensee has successfully
performed the required inspections,
tests, and analyses for ITAAC
E.2.5.04.05.05.02, and that the specified
acceptance criteria are met for Vogtle
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53482-53483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-458; NRC-2013-0190]
Entergy Operations, Inc., River Bend Station, Unit 1; Exemption
1.0 Background
Entergy Operations Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License No. NPF-47, which authorizes operation of
the River Bend Station, Unit 1 (RBS). The license provides, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) now or hereafter
in effect.
The facility consists of a boiling-water reactor located in West
Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.
2.0 Request/Action
Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
appendix J, ``Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-
Cooled Power Reactors,'' requires that components which penetrate
containment be periodically leak tested at the ``Pa,''
defined as the ``calculated peak containment internal pressure related
to the design basis accident specified either in the technical
specification or associated bases.'' In October 2011, Entergy was
contacted by the NRC concerning the station's use of the appendix J
definition of Pa. The NRC noted a conflict between Entergy's
interpretation of that definition of Pa and the literal
reading of the definition of Pa in the regulations. Entergy
stated it was defining Pa based on the long-term calculated
pressure peak for the containment as a whole and not on the short-term
localized pressure spike in wetwell.
By letter dated August 23, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12241A250), Entergy submitted
a request for an exemption from the definition of the Pa as
stated in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J, and substitute an alternate
definition. The value of Pa is determined by calculating the
pressure response in containment over time after a main steam line
break. The original containment analysis for RBS had determined
Pa to be 7.6 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). In July
1999, RBS submitted a license amendment request to increase the
licensed thermal power of the station by 5 percent from 2,894 megawatts
thermal (MWth) to 3,039 MWth. As part of the extended power uprate
review, new calculations were performed and determined that a localized
pressure spike in the wetwell occurs within a few seconds of the
accident and with a pressure peak at 9.3 psig. However, the localized
pressure in the wetwell quickly drops by several psig as the pressure
equalizes throughout containment. This calculation also determined that
the long-term peak containment pressure is 3.6 psig. To avoid a large
number of procedure changes, which would be required if the value was
changed, RBS elected to maintain Pa at the original (pre-
extended power uprate) value of 7.6 psig, which is conservative to the
calculated long-term peak value of 3.6 psig. The exemption would allow
Entergy to continue to use the previously calculated value of 7.6 psig
for Pa for RBS instead of the localized pressure spike in
the wetwell calculated value of 9.3 psig.
The NRC staff has concluded that the use of the alternate
definition for Pa meets the intent of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J because it provides testing of the primary containment
parameters at a pressure that would exist throughout containment over
the long term following a design basis accident.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1) the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present. The staff accepts the
licensee's determination that an exemption would be required to
continue to use the alternate definition of Pa from that
defined in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J.
The NRC staff examined the licensee's rationale to support the
exemption request and concluded that the use the value of 7.6 psig for
Pa would meet the underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J. Supporting the use of this alternate value is:
(1) The time for the pressure spike to occur and fall to
equilibrium is 6 seconds, which is not sufficient time to release
source terms from the core,
[[Page 53483]]
(2) the pressure spike is also localized to the wetwell area which
makes up roughly 10 percent of containment,
(3) the number of containment penetrations in this area is limited.
Therefore, the current Pa value of 7.6 psig meets the intent
of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J by bounding the peak bulk containment
pressure (3.6 psig) and assuring that leakage through the primary
containment does not exceed allowable leakage rate values,
(4) the calculated peak bulk containment pressure is 3.6 psig so
the Technical Specification (TS) value of 7.6 is conservative for the
use of determining containment leakage, and
(5) this request is consistent with the determination that the NRC
staff has reached for other licensees under similar conditions based on
the same considerations.
The application for exemption may be examined, and/or copied for a
fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the
ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC's Web site, https://www.nrc.gov (the Electronic Reading Room).
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that requesting exemption under
the special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) is appropriate and
that the alternate definition of Pa may be used for the
appendix J testing.
Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow Entergy to use a Pa value of
7.6 psig for appendix J testing at the RBS as discussed above. As
stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the licensee's proposed exemption is in
accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission's regulations. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by
law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The underlying purposes of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J are stated in
section (I) ``Introduction.'' The purpose is to conduct tests to assure
that a) leakage through the primary reactor containment does not exceed
allowable leakage rate values and b) to conduct periodic surveillance
of reactor containment penetrations to support proper maintenance. No
new accident precursors are created because the testing is conducted at
a Pa value calculated to be representative of peak
conditions throughout containment during a design basis accident. No
new accident precursors are created by use of a Pa of 7.6
psig instead of 9.3 psig, thus, the probability of postulated accidents
is not increased. Therefore, there is no undue risk to public health
and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense and Security
The exemption would permit exclusion of the short duration spike in
wetwell pressure as Pa for Appendix J testing purposes. This
change to the interpretation of Pa as defined in Appendix J
has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and
security is not impacted by this exemption.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common
defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Entergy Operations, Inc., an
exemption from the definition for Pa in 10 CFR part 50,
appendix J for River Bend Station, Unit 1 and alternatively to continue
to use a Pa value of 7.6 psig.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment (78 FR 50454; August 19, 2013).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of August 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michele G. Evans,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2013-21103 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P