List of Fisheries for 2013, 53336-53363 [2013-21054]
Download as PDF
53336
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 188.05–1(a)—Continued
Method of propulsion,
qualified by size or
other limitation 1
Vessels inspected
and certificated
under Subchapter
D—Tank Vessels 2
Vessels inspected
and certificated
under Subchapter
H—Passenger Vessels 2 3 4 5 or Subchapter K or T—
Small Passenger
Vessels 2 3 4
Vessels inspected
and certificated
under Subchapter I—
Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels 2 5
Vessels subject to
the provisions of
Subchapter C—
Uninspected
Vessels 2 3 6 7 8
Vessels subject to
the provisions of
Subchapter U—
Oceanographic
Vessels 2 3 6 7 9
Vessels subject to
the provisions of
Subchapter O—Certain Bulk and Dangerous Cargoes 10
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
(A) Recreational
vehicles not
engaged in
trade.
(B) Documented
cargo or tank
vessels issued
a permit to
carry 16 or
fewer persons
in addition to
the crew.
(C) Fishing vessels not engaged in
ocean or
coastwise
service. Such
vessels may
carry persons
on the legitimate business
of the vessel 6
in addition to
the crew, as
restricted by
the definition
of passenger.7
Key to symbols used in this table: ≤ means less than or equal to; > means greater than; < means less than; and ≥ means greater than or equal to.
Footnotes:
1 Where length is used in this table, it means the length measured from end to end over the deck, excluding sheer. This expression means a straight line measurement of the overall length from the foremost part of the vessel to the aftermost part of the vessel, measured parallel to the centerline.
2 Subchapters E (Load Lines), F (Marine Engineering), J (Electrical Engineering), N (Dangerous Cargoes), S (Subdivision and Stability), and W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter may also be applicable under certain conditions. The provisions of 49 CFR parts 171 through 179 apply whenever packaged
hazardous materials are on board vessels (including motorboats), except when specifically exempted by law.
3 Public nautical schoolships, other than vessels of the Navy and Coast Guard, must meet the requirements of part 167 of subchapter R (Nautical Schools) of this
chapter, Civilian nautical schoolships, as defined by 46 U.S.C. 1331, must meet the requirements of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) and part 168 of subchapter R
(Nautical Schools) of this chapter.
4 Subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter covers only those vessels of 100 gross tons or more, subchapter T (Small Passenger Vessels) of this chapter
covers only those vessels of less than 100 gross tons, and subchapter K (Small Passenger Vessels) of this chapter covers only those vessels less than 100 gross
tons carrying more than 150 passengers or overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers.
5 Vessels covered by subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) or I (Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels) of this chapter, where the principal purpose or use of the vessel is
not for the carriage of liquid cargo, may be granted a permit to carry a limited amount of flammable or combustible liquid cargo in bulk. The portion of the vessel used
for the carriage of the flammable or combustible liquid cargo must meet the requirements of subchapter D (Tank Vessels) in addition to the requirements of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) or I (Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels) of this chapter.
6 Any vessel on an international voyage is subject to the requirements of the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS).
7 The terms ‘‘passenger(s)’’ and ‘‘passenger(s)-for-hire’’ are as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(21)(21a). On oceanographic vessels, scientific personnel onboard shall
not be deemed to be passengers nor seamen, but for calculations of lifesaving equipment, etc., must be counted as persons.
8 Boilers and machinery are subject to examination on vessels over 40 feet in length.
9 Under 46 U.S.C. 441 an oceanographic research vessel ‘‘. . . being employed exclusively in instruction in oceanography or limnology, or both, or exclusively in
oceanographic research, . . . . Under 46 U.S.C. 443, ‘‘an oceanographic research vessel shall not be deemed to be engaged in trade or commerce.’’ If or when an
oceanographic vessel engages in trade or commerce, such vessel cannot operate under its certificate of inspection as an oceanographic vessel, but shall be inspected and certified for the service in which engaged, and the scientific personnel aboard then become persons employed in the business of the vessel.
10 Bulk dangerous cargoes are cargoes specified in table 151.01–10(b); in table 1 of part 153, and in table 4 of part 154 of this chapter.
11 For manned tankbarges, see § 151.01–10(c) of this chapter.
12 See § 151.01–15, 153.900(d), or 154.30 of this chapter as appropriate.
13 Sail vessel means a vessel with no auxiliary machinery on board. If the vessel has auxiliary machinery, refer to motor vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Dated: August 12, 2013.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and
Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2013–20351 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 121024581–3714–02]
RIN 0648–BC71
List of Fisheries for 2013
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4700
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2013, as
required by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The final LOF
for 2013 reflects new information on
interactions between commercial
fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery
SUMMARY:
50 CFR Part 229
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
on the LOF into one of three categories
under the MMPA based upon the level
of serious injury and mortality of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The classification of a fishery on
the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to
certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan (TRP) requirements. The
fishery classifications and list of marine
mammal stocks incidentally injured or
killed described in the Final LOF for
2012 remain in effect until the effective
date of the Final LOF for 2013.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates, or any other
aspect of the collection of information
requirements contained in this rule,
should be submitted in writing to Chief,
Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, or to Stuart Levenback, OMB, by
email to Stuart_Levenbach@
omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
White, Office of Protected Resources,
301–427–8494; Allison Rosner,
Northeast Region, 978–281–9328;
Jessica Powell, Southeast Region, 727–
824–5312; Elizabeth Petras, Southwest
Region, 562–980–3238; Brent Norberg,
Northwest Region, 206–526–6550;
Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region, 907–
586–7642; Nancy Young, Pacific Islands
Region, 808–944–2282. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the list of fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories
based on the level of incidental serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals
occurring in each fishery (16 U.S.C.
1387(c)(1)). The classification of a
fishery on the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery may be
required to comply with certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements. NMFS
must reexamine the LOF annually,
considering new information in the
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs) and other relevant
sources, and publish in the Federal
Register any necessary changes to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
LOF after notice and opportunity for
public comment (16 U.S.C.
1387(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which
category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery
classification criteria can be found in
the implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2). The
criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria
consist of a two-tiered, stock-specific
approach that first addresses the total
impact of all fisheries on each marine
mammal stock and then addresses the
impact of individual fisheries on each
stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of
animals per year, of incidental
mortalities and serious injuries of
marine mammals due to commercial
fishing operations relative to the
potential biological removal (PBR) level
for each marine mammal stock. The
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362(20)) defines the
PBR level as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population. This
definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: If the total annual mortality
and serious injury of a marine mammal
stock, across all fisheries, is less than or
equal to 10 percent of the PBR level of
the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock would be placed in Category
III (unless those fisheries interact with
other stock(s) in which total annual
mortality and serious injury is greater
than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise,
these fisheries are subject to the next
tier (Tier 2) of analysis to determine
their classification.
Tier 2, Category I: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the PBR level (i.e., frequent
incidental mortality and serious injuries
of marine mammals).
Tier 2, Category II: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level (i.e.,
occasional incidental mortality and
serious injuries of marine mammals).
Tier 2, Category III: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent
of the PBR level (i.e., a remote
likelihood or no known incidental
mortality and serious injuries of marine
mammals).
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53337
While Tier 1 considers the cumulative
fishery mortality and serious injury for
a particular stock, Tier 2 considers
fishery-specific mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock. Additional
details regarding how the categories
were determined are provided in the
preamble to the final rule implementing
section 118 of the MMPA (60 FR 45086,
August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a
per-stock basis, a fishery may qualify as
one Category for one marine mammal
stock and another Category for a
different marine mammal stock. A
fishery is typically classified on the LOF
at its highest level of classification (e.g.,
a fishery qualifying for Category III for
one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal
stock will be listed under Category II).
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
There are several fisheries on the LOF
classified as Category II that have no
recent documented injuries or
mortalities of marine mammals, or
fisheries that did not result in a serious
injury or mortality rate greater than 1
percent of a stock’s PBR level based on
known interactions. NMFS has
classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that
are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of marine mammals, or according
to factors discussed in the final LOF for
1996 (60 FR 67063, December 28, 1995)
and listed in the regulatory definition of
a Category II fishery, ‘‘In the absence of
reliable information indicating the
frequency of incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals by a
commercial fishery, NMFS will
determine whether the incidental
serious injury or mortality is ‘‘frequent,’’
‘‘occasional,’’ or ‘‘remote’’ by evaluating
other factors such as fishing techniques,
gear used, methods used to deter marine
mammals, target species, seasons and
areas fished, qualitative data from
logbooks or fisher reports, stranding
data, and the species and distribution of
marine mammals in the area, or at the
discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries’’ (50 CFR
229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries
not specifically identified on the LOF
are deemed to be Category II fisheries
until the next LOF is published (50 CFR
229.2).
How does NMFS determine which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine
mammal species or stocks incidentally
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53338
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
killed or injured in each commercial
fishery. To determine which species or
stocks are included as incidentally
killed or injured in a fishery, NMFS
annually reviews the information
presented in the current SARs. The
SARs are based upon the best available
scientific information and provide the
most current and inclusive information
on each stock’s PBR level and level of
interaction with commercial fishing
operations. NMFS also reviews other
sources of new information, including
observer data, stranding data, and fisher
self-reports.
In the absence of reliable information
on the level of mortality or injury of a
marine mammal stock, or insufficient
observer data, NMFS will determine
whether a species or stock should be
added to, or deleted from, the list by
considering other factors such as:
Changes in gear used, increases or
decreases in fishing effort, increases or
decreases in the level of observer
coverage, and/or changes in fishery
management that are expected to lead to
decreases in interactions with a given
marine mammal stock (such as a TRP or
a fishery management plan (FMP)). In
these instances, NMFS will provide
case-specific justification in the LOF for
changes to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured.
How does NMFS determine the levels of
observer coverage in a fishery on the
LOF?
Data obtained from the observer
program and observer coverage levels
are important tools in estimating the
level of marine mammal mortality and
serious injury in commercial fishing
operations. The best available
information on the level of observer
coverage and the spatial and temporal
distribution of observed marine
mammal interactions is presented in the
SARs. Starting with the 2005 SARs,
each SAR includes an appendix with
detailed descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF, including
observer coverage in those fisheries. The
SARs generally do not provide detailed
information on observer coverage in
Category III fisheries because, under the
MMPA, Category III fisheries are not
required to accommodate observers
aboard vessels due to the remote
likelihood of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals. Fishery
information presented in the SARs’
appendices may include: Level of
observer coverage, target species, levels
of fishing effort, spatial and temporal
distribution of fishing effort,
characteristics of fishing gear and
operations, management and
regulations, and interactions with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources Web site at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Information on observer coverage levels
in Category I and II fisheries can also be
found in the Category I and II fishery
fact sheets on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources Web site: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/
. Additional information on observer
programs in commercial fisheries can be
found on the NMFS National Observer
Program’s Web site: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/.
How do I find out if a specific fishery
is in Category I, II, or III?
This rule includes three tables that
list all U.S. commercial fisheries by LOF
Category. Table 1 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists
all of the commercial fisheries in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S.authorized commercial fisheries on the
high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists
all commercial fisheries managed under
applicable TRPs or take reduction teams
(TRT).
Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS
includes high seas fisheries in Table 3
of the LOF, along with the number of
valid High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
(HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of
2004, NMFS issues HSFCA permits only
for high seas fisheries analyzed in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
authorized high seas fisheries are broad
in scope and encompass multiple
specific fisheries identified by gear type.
For the purposes of the LOF, the high
seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse
seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to provide more
detail on composition of effort within
these fisheries. Many fisheries operate
in both U.S. waters and on the high
seas, creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and
those in Table 3. In these cases, the high
seas component of the fishery is not
considered a separate fishery, but an
extension of a fishery operating within
U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2).
NMFS designates those fisheries in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ‘‘*’’ after the
fishery’s name. The number of HSFCA
permits listed in Table 3 for the high
seas components of these fisheries
operating in U.S. waters does not
necessarily represent additional effort
that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Many vessels/participants holding
HSFCA permits also fish within U.S.
waters and are included in the number
of vessels and participants operating
within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for five
years, during which time FMPs can
change. Therefore, some vessels/
participants may possess valid HSFCA
permits without the ability to fish under
the permit because it was issued for a
gear type that is no longer authorized
under the most current FMP. For this
reason, the number of HSFCA permits
displayed in Table 3 is likely higher
than the actual U.S. fishing effort on the
high seas. For more information on how
NMFS classifies high seas fisheries on
the LOF, see the preamble text in the
final 2009 LOF (73 FR 73032; December
1, 2008).
Where can I find specific information
on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS
developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF. These fishery
fact sheets provide the full history of
each Category I and II fishery, including:
When the fishery was added to the LOF,
the basis for the fishery’s initial
classification, classification changes to
the fishery, changes to the list of species
or stocks incidentally killed or injured
in the fishery, fishery gear and methods
used, observer coverage levels, fishery
management and regulation, and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These
fishery fact sheets are updated after each
final LOF and can be found under ‘‘How
Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery is in
Category I, II, or III?’’ on the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources’ Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/lof/, linked to the ‘‘List of
Fisheries by Year’’ table. NMFS plans to
develop similar fishery fact sheets for
each Category III fishery on the LOF.
However, due to the large number of
Category III fisheries on the LOF and the
lack of accessible and detailed
information on many of these fisheries,
the development of these fishery fact
sheets will take significant time to
complete. NMFS anticipates posting
Category III fishery fact sheets along
with the final 2015 LOF, although this
timeline may be revised as this effort
progresses.
Am I required to register under the
MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in
a Category I or II fishery are required
under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)),
as described in 50 CFR 229.4, to register
with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization to lawfully take
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
non-endangered and non-threatened
marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations. Owners
of vessels or gear engaged in a Category
III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal
authorization.
How do I register and receive my
authorization certificate and injury/
mortality reporting forms?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA
registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program (MMAP), with
existing state and Federal fishery
license, registration, or permit systems
for Category I and II fisheries on the
LOF. Participants in these fisheries are
automatically registered under the
MMAP and are not required to submit
registration or renewal materials
directly under the MMAP. In the Pacific
Islands, Southwest, Northwest, and
Alaska regions, NMFS will issue vessel
or gear owners an authorization
certificate and/or injury/mortality
reporting forms via U.S. mail or with
their state or Federal license at the time
of renewal. In the Northeast region,
NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners
an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
automatically at the beginning of each
calendar year, but vessel or gear owners
must request or print injury/mortality
reporting forms by contacting the NMFS
Northeast Regional Office at 978–281–
9328 or by visiting the Northeast
Regional Office Web site (https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/mmap). In the
Southeast region, NMFS will issue
vessel or gear owners notification of
registry and vessel or gear owners may
receive their authorization certificate
and/or injury/mortality reporting form
by contacting the Southeast Regional
Office at 727–209–5952 or by visiting
the Southeast Regional Office Web site
(https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/mm/
mmap.htm) and following the
instructions for printing the necessary
documents.
The authorization certificate, or a
copy, must be on board the vessel while
it is operating in a Category I or II
fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in
the possession of the person in charge
of the fishing operation (50 CFR
229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to
limit the issuance of authorization
certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or
II fisheries, not all state and Federal
permit systems distinguish between
fisheries as classified by the LOF.
Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in
Category III fisheries may receive
authorization certificates even though
they are not required for Category III
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
fisheries. Individuals fishing in Category
I and II fisheries for which no state or
Federal permit is required must register
with NMFS by contacting their
appropriate Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
How do I renew my registration under
the MMAP?
In Southwest, Alaska, and Northeast
regional fisheries, registrations of vessel
or gear owners are automatically
renewed and participants should
receive an authorization certificate by
January 1 of each new year. In Pacific
Islands regional fisheries, vessel or gear
owners should receive an authorization
certificate by January 1 for state fisheries
and with their permit renewal for
federal fisheries. In Northwest regional
fisheries, vessel or gear owners receive
authorization with each renewed state
fishing license, the timing of which
varies based on target species. Vessel or
gear owners who participate in these
regions and have not received
authorization certificates by January 1 or
with renewed fishing licenses must
contact the appropriate NMFS Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES).
In Southeast regional fisheries, vessel
or gear owners’ registrations are
automatically renewed and participants
will receive a letter in the mail by
January 1 instructing them to contact
the Southeast Regional Office to have an
authorization certificate mailed to them
or to visit the Southeast Regional Office
Web site (https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
mm/mmap.htm) to print their own
certificate.
Am I required to submit reports when
I injure or kill a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing
operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6, any
vessel owner or operator, or gear owner
or operator (in the case of non-vessel
fisheries), participating in a fishery
listed on the LOF must report to NMFS
all incidental injuries and mortalities of
marine mammals that occur during
commercial fishing operations,
regardless of the category in which the
fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip.
‘‘Injury’’ is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as
a wound or other physical harm. In
addition, any animal that ingests fishing
gear or any animal that is released with
fishing gear entangling, trailing, or
perforating any part of the body is
considered injured, regardless of the
presence of any wound or other
evidence of injury, and must be
reported. Injury/mortality reporting
forms and instructions for submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53339
forms to NMFS can be downloaded
from: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
pdfs/interactions/mmap_reporting_
form.pdf or by contacting the
appropriate Regional office (see
ADDRESSES). Reporting requirements
and procedures can be found in 50 CFR
229.6.
Am I required to take an observer
aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a
Category I or II fishery are required to
accommodate an observer aboard their
vessel(s) upon request from NMFS.
MMPA section 118 states that an
observer will not be placed on a vessel
if the facilities for quartering an
observer or performing observer
functions are inadequate or unsafe,
therefore, vessels too small to
accommodate an observer are exempt
from this requirement. However,
observer requirements will not be
exempted, regardless of vessel size, for
U.S. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline vessels
operating in special areas designated by
the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction
Plan implementing regulations (50 CFR
229.36(d)). Observer requirements can
be found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I required to comply with any
marine mammal take reduction plan
regulations?
Table 4 in this rule provides a list of
fisheries affected by TRPs and TRTs.
TRP regulations can be found at 50 CFR
229.30 through 229.37. A description of
each TRT and copies of each TRP can
be found at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/interactions/trt/. It is the
responsibility of fishery participants to
comply with applicable take reduction
regulations.
Where can I find more information
about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and
the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program, including registration
procedures and forms, current and past
LOFs, information on each Category I
and II fishery, observer requirements,
and marine mammal injury/mortality
reporting forms and submittal
procedures, may be obtained at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/
lof/, or from any NMFS Regional Office
at the addresses listed below:
NMFS, Northeast Region, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–
2298, Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Jessica Powell;
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53340
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213, Attn: Elizabeth Petras;
NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand
Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115, Attn:
Brent Norberg, Protected Resources
Division;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected
Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn:
Bridget Mansfield; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region,
Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI
96814, Attn: Nancy Young.
Sources of Information Reviewed for
the Final 2013 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal
incidental serious injury and mortality
information presented in the SARs for
all fisheries to determine whether
changes in fishery classification were
warranted. The SARs are based on the
best scientific information available at
the time of preparation, including the
level of serious injury and mortality of
marine mammals that occurs incidental
to commercial fishery operations and
the PBR levels of marine mammal
stocks. The information contained in the
SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific
Review Groups (SRGs) representing
Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii),
and the U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean. The SRGs were created
by the MMPA to review the science that
informs the SARs, and to advise NMFS
on marine mammal population status,
trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research
needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of
new information, including marine
mammal stranding data, observer
program data, fisher self-reports, reports
to the SRGs, conference papers, FMPs,
and ESA documents.
The LOF for 2013 was based, among
other things, on information provided in
the NEPA and ESA documents
analyzing authorized high seas fisheries;
stranding data; fishermen self-reports
through the MMAP; the final SARs for
2006 (72 FR 12774, March 19, 2007),
2007 (73 FR 21111, April 18, 2008),
2008 (74 FR 19530, April 29, 2009),
2009 (75 FR 12498, March 16, 2010),
2010 (76 FR 34054, June 10, 2011), 2011
(77 FR 29969, May 21, 2012); and 2012
(78 FR 19446, April 1, 2013, 78 FR
32377, May 30, 2013). The SARs are
available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/sars/.
Fishery Descriptions
Beginning with the final 2008 LOF (72
FR 66048, November 27, 2007), NMFS
describes each Category I and II fishery
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
in the LOF. In each LOF, NMFS
describes the fisheries classified as
Category I or II that were not classified
as such on a previous LOF (and
therefore have not yet been described in
the LOF). Descriptions of all Category I
and II fisheries operating in U.S. waters
may be found in the SARs, FMPs, and
TRPs, through state agencies, or through
the fishery summary documents
available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources Web site (https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/
lof/.) Additional details for Category I
and II fisheries operating on the high
seas are included in various FMPs,
NEPA, or ESA documents.
The ‘‘Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands rockfish trawl’’ fishery is
reclassified from Category III to Category
II. Rockfish species fished include
Pacific Ocean perch, northern rockfish,
rougheye rockfish, shortraker rockfish,
and other rockfish. Fishing effort in this
fishery takes place in the U.S. Exclusive
Economic Zone of the Eastern Bering
Sea and the portion of the North Pacific
Ocean adjacent to the Aleutian Islands,
which is west of 170°W longitude up to
the U.S.-Russian Convention Line of
1867. Pacific Ocean perch in the
Aleutian Islands is allocated under the
Amendment 80 catch share program to
the trawl gear sectors. Northern
rockfish, rougheye rockfish, shortraker
rockfish, and other rockfish do not have
directed fisheries but are caught
incidentally in other fisheries. There are
currently an estimated 28 vessels
licensed in this fishery.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 10 comment letters on
the proposed LOF for 2013 (78 FR
23708, April 22, 2013). Comments were
received from the Blue Water
Fishermen’s Association, Bright Eye
Fishing Company, Center for Biological
Diversity, Hawaii Longline Association,
Marine Mammal Commission, Oceana,
Inc., Turtle Island Restoration Network,
U.S. Department of the Interior, Western
Pacific Regional Fishery Management
Council, and one individual. Comments
on issues outside the scope of the LOF
were noted, but generally without
response.
General Comments
Comment 1: An individual
commenter requests that NMFS
explicitly state what years of data are
used in LOF analyses, specifically in the
vessels/persons and other tables where
dates are not provided, to make the
information more clear and useful.
Response: In the preamble, NMFS
states the years of the data used in the
LOF review. NMFS used the best
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
available data for each stock. In this rule
for 2013, we used data from 2006–2010.
The majority of data used come from the
SARs, which are updated annually. In
the SARs, the dates of the data used are
stated. Other best available data sources
include: Observer data, stranding data,
and fisher self-reports. In the vessels/
persons tables the most current federal
and state commercial fisheries data are
used. References to specific data sources
are included in the proposed 2013 LOF
rule (78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013)
‘‘Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2013’’ section.
Comment 2: The Marine Mammal
Commission (Commission) recommends
that NMFS work in collaboration with
the states to develop reliable methods
for estimating the number of
participants in fisheries.
Response: As stated in the Final 2012
LOF (76 FR 73912, November 29, 2011),
Table 2 represents a description of each
fishery including the estimated number
of persons/vessels active in the fishery.
Currently, a clear measure of effort for
all state fisheries has not been
determined due to the way some state
permits allow for the use of multiple
gear types. As stated in the proposed
2013 LOF (78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013),
NMFS recognizes that there may be
disparity between permit holders listed
and actual fishing effort; however, the
numbers provided on the LOF are solely
used for descriptive purposes and will
not be used in determining future
management of fisheries, observer
coverage designations, or bycatch rates,
which are all done through other
processes that include public comment
periods. Further, NMFS has
communicated with the states regarding
the need for consistent fishing effort
data collection methods across states to
better assess fisheries’ effects on marine
mammal stocks that have interstate
distributions. NMFS will continue to
communicate this need through TRT
processes, LOF yearly inquiries, and the
Marine Mammal Authorization
Program’s (MMAP’s) integrated
registration process and will work with
states to improve the accuracy of these
estimated numbers of vessels/persons.
Comment 3: The Center for Biological
Diversity (CBD) requests that NMFS not
reclassify fisheries to a lower category or
remove marine mammals from the list
when information on the fishery and its
interactions is scant.
Response: As stated in the Final 2012
LOF (76 FR 73912, November 29, 2011),
NMFS considers a broad range of
information when proposing or making
fishery classification decisions on the
LOF and does not classify fisheries
based solely on the presence or absence
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
of serious injuries or mortalities. Under
the implementing regulations for section
118, NMFS uses observer data, logbook
data, stranding data, fishers’ reports,
anecdotal reports, qualitative factors
outlined in 50 CFR 229.2 (i.e., fishing
techniques, gear used, methods used to
deter marine mammals, target species,
seasons and areas fished, qualitative
data from logbooks or fisher reports,
stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the
area), information on incidental serious
injury or mortality to marine mammals
reported in SARs (50 CFR 229.2; 60 FR
45086, August 30, 1995; 60 FR 67063,
December 28, 1995), and input received
during the public comment periods.
NMFS considers all of this information
to determine whether the fishery can be
classified on the LOF based on
quantitative information analyzed
through the Tier 1 and 2 analyses; or
whether the fishery can be classified on
the LOF based on the qualitative
information outlined in NMFS
regulations at 50 CFR 229.2.
Comment 4: The CBD recommends
that NMFS be more transparent about
the statistical reliability of bycatch
estimates. The CBD reiterated an old
Commission recommendation that
NMFS include observer coverage for
each fishery on the List of Fisheries,
including Category III fisheries, to allow
the reader to assess the adequacy of
information on incidental mortality and
serious injury to marine mammals. CBD
recommends adding a column with
observer coverage to the first table in the
proposed rule that lists each fishery and
the estimated number of participants.
Response: NMFS agrees with CBD’s
comment referencing the Commission’s
comment from the Final 2012 LOF (76
FR 73916, November 29, 2011,
comment/response 2), that summarizing
the information used as the basis to
classify each fishery on the LOF in one
location could be useful for interested
readers. NMFS has posted information
on each Category I and II fishery on the
LOF on the NMFS Office of Protected
Resources Web site (https://www.nmfs.
noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/), where it
can be considered at the readers’
discretion. NMFS is developing similar
fishery fact sheets for each Category III
fishery and anticipates posting those
fishery fact sheets along with the final
2015 LOF. However, due to the large
number of Category III fisheries on the
LOF and the lack of accessible and
detailed information on many of these
fisheries, this timeline may be revised as
this effort progresses.
Comment 5: The CBD opposes the
inclusion of aquaculture operations as
Category III fisheries and recommends
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
that they be managed under MMPA
Section 101(a)(5)(A) through (D) with
take prohibitions and permits.
Response: As stated in the Final 2012
LOF (76 FR 73912, November 29, 2011),
NMFS works under Section 118 of the
MMPA which governs the ‘‘taking of
marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations.’’ The
MMPA does not provide a definition of
a commercial fishing operation;
therefore, NMFS defined ‘‘commercial
fishing operation’’ in regulations at 50
CFR 229.2. The definition was
presented in the proposed and final
rules implementing the regulations for
section 118 of the MMPA (60 FR 31666,
June 16, 1995; 60 FR 65086, August 30,
1995). As noted in those proposed and
final rules, and in the responses to
comments on the 2009, 2010 and 2012
LOFs (73 FR 73032, December 1, 2008,
comment/response 5; 74 FR 58859,
November 16, 2009, comment/response
11; 76 FR 73916, November 29, 2011,
comment/response 3), the definition of
a ‘‘commercial fishing operation’’
includes aquaculture. The regulations in
50 CFR 229.2 define a ‘‘commercial
fishing operation’’ as ‘‘the catching,
taking, or harvesting of fish from the
marine environment . . . . The term
includes . . . aquaculture activities.’’
Further, ‘‘fishing or to fish’’ is defined
as ‘‘any commercial fishing operation.’’
Therefore, aquaculture fisheries are
considered commercial fisheries that are
managed under section 118 of the
MMPA and are therefore included on
the annual LOF.
Comment 6: The Commission
recommends that NMFS include in the
2014 LOF the estimated fishing effort,
number of participants, and sources of
the estimates (e.g., number of active
participants, number of licensed
vessels/persons, number of vessels/
persons in previous LOFs, or other).
Response: Section 118 (c)(1) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act states
that the Secretary shall include ‘‘the
approximate number of vessels or
persons actively involved in, each such
fishery.’’ Each year NMFS provides
updates on the estimated fishery
participants as indicated in Table 2.
NMFS provides a description of the
sources of this information in each
proposed rule when changes to the LOF
are proposed. NMFS describes why
these numbers may reflect potential
industry participation and not
necessarily active permit holders.
Providing additional information on
active participants, as requested by the
commenter, may be possible for federal
and some state permit/license holders.
However, it is not currently available for
many state fisheries.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53341
NMFS requests state permit holder
data from state agencies through the
MMAP integrated registration process.
At that time, NMFS provides state
officials with the MMPA Category I &
Category II fishery definitions. State
representatives, being experts in their
fisheries, then assign their state fisheries
to the most appropriate LOF fishery
when responding to NMFS’s annual
request for permit holder information.
In some cases, a permit holder may have
the potential to use a particular gear
type, though they may not be actively
participating. NMFS has interpreted
Table 2 to represent an estimation of
‘‘potential participation’’ in a fishery,
and each year provides specific
language that explains that these
numbers represent estimates and not
actual effort for certain fisheries. NMFS
will strive to include the requested
additional information of estimated
fishing effort, number of participants,
and sources of estimates in the fishery
fact sheets that are available on the
NMFS Office of Protected Resources
Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/lof/.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean
Comment 7: The Commission
recommends that NMFS elevate the
Hawaii charter and Hawaii trolling, rod
and reel fisheries to Category II and
initiate observer coverage to obtain data
necessary to rigorously assess the risk
the fisheries pose to the Hawaii stock of
pantropical spotted dolphins. The
Commission states that NMFS’s
conclusions regarding total commercial
fishery-related mortality and serious
injury of Hawaiian pantropical spotted
dolphins are based on a series of
observations that are not sufficient to
assess the takes from the fisheries. The
Commission also disagrees with NMFS’s
conclusion that, ‘‘in the absence of
evidence of mortality/serious injury
. . . a Category III classification . . . is
appropriate,’’ for it shifts the burden of
proof away from fishery management
and removes the incentive to collect
data needed to characterize the level of
take.
Response: NMFS is retaining the
Hawaii charter and Hawaii trolling, rod
and reel fisheries as Category III
fisheries. As described in the proposed
rule (78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013),
NMFS does not have a quantitative
estimate of the number of mortalities
and serious injuries of pantropical
spotted dolphins in the fisheries. In the
absence of that data, consistent with 50
CFR 229.2, NMFS considers other
factors to assess the risk to the dolphins,
including fishing techniques, gear used,
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
53342
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data, stranding information,
and other relevant information on
marine mammals. We have evaluated
the available information, which is
summarized in the proposed rule, and
determined that incidental mortalities
and serious injuries are likely rare,
rather than ‘‘occasional’’; and, thus, a
Category III classification is warranted.
NMFS has the authority to place
observers on Category III vessels under
certain circumstances and to develop an
alternative observer program to collect
data on commercial fishing operations
via other platforms (e.g., vessels,
airplanes, points on shore) (50 CFR
229.7). Although NMFS is not initiating
observer coverage for the troll and
charter vessel fisheries at this time, we
will continue to work with the State of
Hawaii and with independent
researchers to collect and evaluate
information on the interaction between
the fisheries and dolphins.
Comment 8: The Western Pacific
Regional Fishery Management Council
concurs with NMFS that the Hawaii
charter and Hawaii trolling, rod and reel
fisheries should remain Category III.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment and is finalizing the Hawaii
charter and Hawaii trolling, rod and reel
fisheries’ proposed Category III
classification.
Comment 9: The CBD opposes the
removal of humpback whales (Central
North Pacific stock) and Blainville’s
beaked whales (Hawaiian stock) from
the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery. The CBD
provides three reasons for retaining the
species on the list. First, effort in the
fishery increased from 2010 to 2011,
and interactions with marine mammals
will increase with the additional effort.
As a result, NMFS should not now
remove these species. Second, 20%
observer coverage means there is a
quantifiable risk that some interactions
are unobserved and unreported,
especially for the endangered humpback
whale, NMFS should consider more
than the most recent five years of data
before removing a species historically
taken by the fishery. Third, excluding
marine mammals based solely on a lack
of documented injuries or deaths in the
most recent 5-year period is inconsistent
with NMFS policy and prior practice.
For example, NMFS just added
Blainville’s beaked whales on the 2012
LOF as an acknowledgment of the great
uncertainty in identifying species and
stocks taken in this fishery outside the
U.S. EEZ. Therefore, the removal from
the list on the basis of information for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
the most recent five-year period seems
contradictory to what NMFS decided in
listing them.
Response: NMFS is removing the two
stocks from the list of species and stocks
injured or killed in the Category I
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery, as
proposed. Responses to each of the
CBD’s three arguments are set forth
below.
First, although the number of fishing
sets in the Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery has increased somewhat from
2010 to 2011 (Pacific Islands Fisheries
Science Center, Fisheries Monitoring
Branch, 2012), this fact alone does not
indicate that there was or will be an
increase in marine mammal
interactions. The Hawaii deep-set
fishery operates under a limited entry
system, with the number of vessels
remaining relatively constant over the
past ten years. NMFS is removing these
two marine mammal species/stocks
because they have not been observed to
be caught in the fishery in the most
recent five years of data included in this
analysis (2006–2010). NMFS will
continue to update the list in future
LOFs to reflect the best available data on
observed interactions.
Second, in fisheries where observer
coverage is inadequate, NMFS may
retain species and stocks on the list for
longer than five years, on a case-by-case
basis. In the Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery, NMFS is satisfied that existing
observer coverage (20%) is sufficient to
detect even rare marine mammal
bycatch events, particularly when data
are pooled across multiple years.
Therefore, NMFS is relying on observer
data to inform the list of species injured
or killed in the fishery.
Third, NMFS considers these changes
to the list of species injured or killed to
be consistent with our policy and prior
practice. The CBD’s discussion of the
addition of the Blainville’s beaked
whale to the list contains factual errors
that we clarify below. The Hawaiian
stock of Blainville’s beaked whale has
been included on the list of species
injured/killed in the Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery since the 2009 LOF
(and in the Hawaii longline fishery on
the 2006–2008 LOFs before the Hawaii
deep- and shallow-set longline fisheries
were split). The most recently observed
interaction with a Blainville’s beaked
whale in the deep-set fishery was a nonserious injury on the high seas in 2005.
In the 2012 LOF, NMFS added an
‘‘unknown’’ stock of Blainville’s beaked
whale to the high-seas component of the
fishery (Table 3—Western Pacific
Pelagic (Hawaii Deep-set component)) to
account for the uncertainty in stock (not
species) identification on the high seas
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
given that the full offshore ranges of
Hawaiian pelagic cetacean stocks are
unknown. Accordingly, the addition of
this ‘‘unknown’’ stock was meant to
account for the inherent uncertainty in
identifying whether the animals are
from the Hawaiian pelagic stocks or
from other high seas stocks and not
because of additional observed takes
within the time period considered for
the 2012 LOF (2005–2009). More recent
data indicate there have been no
observed interactions with Blainville’s
beaked whales in the most recent 5-year
period (2006–2010); and, thus, the
removal of the species (including both
the Hawaiian and unknown stocks) is
appropriate.
Comment 10: The CBD continues to
have concern over NMFS’s lack of
assessment and analysis of fisheries’
impacts on Hawaiian monk seals. The
CBD stated that, given the critically
endangered status of the monk seal, any
interaction is significant and any fishing
mortality would qualify a fishery as
Category I if NMFS calculated the
potential biological removal (PBR) level.
Continuing to rely on the fact that the
PBR level for monk seals is
‘‘undetermined’’ to justify NMFS’s
failure to make a quantitative evaluation
of incidental mortality and serious
injury compared to PBR evades the
intent and legal mandates of the MMPA.
Response: NMFS expects that the
great majority of fisheries’ interactions
with Hawaiian monk seals occur in the
main Hawaiian Islands (MHI), where
coastal and recreational fisheries
primarily operate. Currently, NMFS is
only able to estimate the minimum
number of fisheries’ interactions based
on opportunistic reporting by the
public. Reports about interactions
coming directly from fishermen are rare.
A majority of those reported interactions
are hookings (serious injury). However,
notwithstanding these fisheries
interactions, NMFS is encouraged that
the monk seal population in the MHI
continues to increase, with an estimated
intrinsic population growth rate of 6.5%
per year (Baker et al., 2011).
NMFS is unable to reliably determine
whether an interaction (i.e., hooking)
occurred in a commercial or recreational
fishery, primarily for two reasons. First,
when a seal is sighted with a hook, it
is often difficult to determine the fishery
of origin, even if the hook or other gear
is recovered from the animal. Second,
many Hawaiian fisheries have both
commercial and non-commercial
components. As a result, even if the
fishery can be identified from the
recovered gear, it may be difficult to
verify whether the interaction occurred
during commercial fishing (and would
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
thus be evaluated on the LOF). This
issue will not be resolved without
improved information and reporting by
fishermen.
NMFS continues to try to improve its
data collection, analysis and assessment
of fisheries’ interactions and their
impacts on Hawaiian monk seals. NMFS
is currently working with state and
private partners to address some of
these limitations in data and reporting.
Some examples include:
• The NMFS Pacific Islands Fisheries
Science Center Hawaiian Monk Seal
Research Program (HMSRP) partners
with the State of Hawaii to better
quantify and describe potential monk
seal interactions with fisheries in order
to develop mitigation strategies.
• The HMSRP is conducting a
community-based research project using
National Geographic Crittercams to look
at the seals’ foraging behavior and
fisheries interactions. This project
allows fishermen to take part in the
research and has a substantial
community engagement component
educating the fishing community about
seals and encouraging reporting.
• The NMFS Pacific Islands Regional
Office develops outreach products and
messages to inform fishermen about best
practices when fishing around monk
seals and how to report interactions.
• Several Federal, State, and nongovernmental organization liaisons are
working with various fishing
communities to encourage better
reporting of monk seal interactions.
NMFS will continue to work with its
state and federal partners and the public
to better understand, quantify, and
reduce monk seal-fishery interactions.
Comment 11: The Hawaii Longline
Association (HLA) argues that the
Hawaii-based deep-set longline fishery
does not interact with MHI insular false
killer whales and opposes including the
stock on the list of marine mammals
injured or killed in the deep-set fishery.
Response: NMFS determines which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery by annually reviewing the
information presented in the current
SARs, among other relevant sources.
The SARs are based on the best
available scientific information and
provide the most current and inclusive
information on each stock, including
range, abundance, PBR, and level of
interaction with commercial fishing
operations. The LOF does not analyze or
evaluate the data and calculations
contained within the SARs.
The 2012 SAR for false killer whales
indicates that an average of 0.5
mortalities or serious injuries of MHI
insular false killer whales occur each
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
year incidental to the Hawaii-based
deep-set longline fishery (Carretta et al.,
2013). Therefore, NMFS is retaining the
stock on the list of marine mammal
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
For a more complete analysis of the
methodology for determining mortality
and serious injury of MHI insular false
killer whales, the commenter is referred
to the 2012 SAR.
Comment 12: The HLA opposes
NMFS’s inclusion of a number of
‘‘unknown’’ marine mammals stocks on
the list of species or stocks injured or
killed in the deep-set and shallow-set
fisheries and states it is in violation of
the MMPA.
Response: The listings of ‘‘unknown’’
stocks are for species that have been
observed to have been taken by the
Hawaii-based deep-set and shallow-set
longline fisheries on the high seas, but
for which the stock identity could not
be reliably determined. NMFS’ SARs for
Hawaii pelagic cetacean stocks note that
the stocks’ ranges extend into the high
seas, but the full offshore ranges are
unknown. For those animals taken by
the longline fisheries on the high seas,
NMFS is often unable to determine
whether the animals belong to the
Hawaii pelagic stocks or other high seas
stocks. This is particularly true for takes
that occur far outside the U.S. EEZ
around the Hawaiian Islands. Therefore,
NMFS’ inclusion of ‘‘unknown’’ stocks
that are known to interact with the
longline fisheries on the high seas is
necessary to account for uncertainty in
stock identification.
Comment 13: The HLA opposes
NMFS adding short-finned pilot whales
to the list of species injured or killed in
the Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery
because it is not supported by the
available data. The addition is based on
a single interaction on the high seas
involving an unidentified cetacean that
‘‘may have’’ been a short-finned pilot
whale. In the absence of data confirming
that the fishery is interacting with shortfinned pilot whales, NMFS may not add
the species to the list of species or
stocks that are incidentally killed or
injured by the fishery.
Response: One unidentified cetacean,
known to be either a false killer whale
or short-finned pilot whale (i.e., a
‘‘blackfish’’), was observed seriously
injured in the shallow-set longline
fishery on the high seas in 2008. When
the species of a blackfish cannot be
positively identified, NMFS prorates the
interaction to one species or the other
based on distance from shore
(McCracken, 2010). Proration of
unidentified blackfish takes accounts for
uncertainty in the bycatch estimates and
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53343
until all animals taken can be identified
to either species (e.g., photos, tissue
samples). This approach constitutes the
best available information and ensures
that potential impacts to all species and
stocks are assessed. Based on this
approach, the estimated average annual
mortality and serious injury of shortfinned pilot whales in the fishery is 0.1
(McCracken, 2011). Therefore, NMFS is
adding the short-finned pilot whale to
the list of species or stocks that are
incidentally killed or injured by the
fishery, as proposed.
Comment 14: The HLA concurs with
NMFS’s proposed removals from the list
of species and stocks that interact with
the Hawaii-based longline fisheries.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment and is finalizing the list of
species and stocks interacting with the
Hawaii deep- and shallow-set longline
fisheries as proposed. As stated in the
proposed rule (78 FR 23708, April 22,
2013), the changes reflect the most
recent five years of data (2006–2010) on
observed marine mammal interactions
in the fisheries.
Comment 15: The Turtle Island
Restoration Network (TIRN)
recommends that NMFS add pygmy
killer whales to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery based
on one observed take in the first quarter
of 2013.
Response: The 2013 LOF does not yet
incorporate the recently observed
pygmy killer whale interaction. The
observed interaction has not yet been
included in any bycatch estimate, and
has not yet been evaluated as part of the
tier analysis for this fishery. This
observed take will be evaluated in a
future LOF.
Comment 16: The Commission
concurs with NMFS’s proposed
reclassifications of the Bering Sea
Aleutian Islands (BSAI) rockfish trawl
fishery from Category III to Category II,
the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery
from Category II to Category III, and the
Alaska Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery
from Category II to Category III.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment and is finalizing the fishery
reclassifications.
Comment 17: The U.S. Department of
the Interior (DOI) concurs with NMFS
that the Southwestern Alaska stock of
northern sea otter is incidentally taken
in the AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet
fishery, the South Central Alaska stock
of northern sea otter is incidentally
taken in the Alaska Prince William
Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery, and
the Pacific walrus is incidentally taken
in the Alaska BSAI flatfish trawl fishery.
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
53344
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment and is finalizing the changes
to the list of species injury or killed in
these fisheries as proposed.
Comment 18: NMFS received four
comment letters supporting the
reclassification of the CA thresher shark
and swordfish drift gillnet fishery. All of
the commenters concurred with the
proposed elevation to Category I, the
addition of the CA/OR/WA stock of
sperm whales to the list of species or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
this fishery, and that interactions with
this stock provide the basis for the
elevation in classification.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment and is finalizing the CA
thresher shark and swordfish drift
gillnet fishery reclassification from
Category II to Category I.
Comment 19: NMFS received three
comment letters about species injured
and killed in the CA swordfish and
thresher shark drift gillnet fishery. All
commenters requested that NMFS add
minke whales to the list of species
incidentally killed or injured in the CA
swordfish and thresher shark drift
gillnet fishery. One letter suggested that
NMFS consider whether these takes
exceeded PBR.
Response: In the proposed 2013 LOF
(78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013), NMFS
relied on information available through
2010. When the proposed 2013 LOF was
drafted, the best available information
on the fisheries and marine mammal
interactions was through 2010. The
available information included
assessments of observed interactions
and serious injuries as well as
extrapolations of the observed
interactions of commercial fisheries and
marine mammals (Carretta and
Enriquez, 2012). A minke whale
interaction was observed in the CA
swordfish and thresher shark drift
gillnet fishery in 2011 (Carretta and
Enriquez, 2012). This information, as
well as other fishery activities through
2011, will be reviewed and included in
the 2014 LOF, as appropriate.
Comment 20: DOI concurs with
NMFS that the CA (southern) sea otters
be listed as incidentally taken in the CA
halibut/white seabass and other species
set gillnet fishery. The DOI recommends
that NMFS add CA sea otters to CA
coonstripe, shrimp, rock crab, tanner
crab pot or trap and CA spiny lobster
fisheries lists.
Response: NMFS received a similar
comment for the proposed 2012 LOF (76
FR 73912, November 29, 2011,
comment/response 9) as well as 2011
LOF (75 FR 68475, November 8, 2010)
and 2010 LOF (74 FR 58859, November
16, 2009). As described in the response
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
to comments in the final 2012 LOF (76
FR 73912, November 29, 2011) and
described in detail in the proposed 2009
LOF (73 FR 33760, June 13, 2008),
NMFS conducted an extensive review of
all available information on marine
mammal interactions with pot/traps
gear in 2008. Also in 2008, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
completed a stock assessment for
southern sea otters. As described in the
2008 SAR and 2009 LOF, there have
been four sea otters that are known to
have died in pot/trap gear in California
and all occurred in 1987 and 1991. The
U.S. Geological Survey and California
Department of Fish and Game (now
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife) collaborated on observing
finfish traps in California, but did not
record any sea otter interactions
(Carretta et al., 2009). The USFWS, as
part of public comments for the 2012
LOF, submitted a paper by Hatfield et
al. (2011), detailing experiments that
indicate that sea otters can enter and
become entrapped in pots or traps with
openings of certain sizes. However, the
paper presented no evidence of this
occurring during commercial fishing
activities off California. The possibility
of an interaction is insufficient
justification to include southern sea
otters on the list of species incidentally
injured or killed in the CA coonstripe
shrimp, rock crab, tanner crab pot or
trap or the CA spiny lobster trap
fisheries. Instead, NMFS needs some
indication that injuries or mortalities are
occurring or have occurred in these
fisheries in recent years (e.g., fisher selfreports, observer data, stranding data). If
additional information becomes
available to indicate that southern sea
otters have been injured or killed in CA
trap/pot fisheries in recent years, NMFS
will consider including this species on
the LOF at that time.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Comment 21: The Blue Water
Fishermen’s Association recommends
that NMFS divide the Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline fishery for swordfish, tuna, and
sharks into three regional fisheries. The
Atlantic and Caribbean should be
divided at the Georgia/Florida state line
into north and south Atlantic regions
and the Gulf of Mexico should be a third
region.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline fishery
should be divided into three regions.
Gear used throughout the large pelagics
longline fishery is relatively the same,
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and marine mammal stocks have the
potential to interact with this gear
across all geographic regions. For
example, other Southeast fisheries
including the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot fishery; the Atlantic mixed species
trap/pot fishery; the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
fishery; and the Mid-Atlantic gillnet
fishery are all grouped together based on
similar gear types, despite slight
regional differences in fishing
techniques or the marine mammal
stocks affected. Furthermore, even
though the pelagics longline fishery is
grouped over geographic regions for
LOF purposes, management measures to
reduce serious injuries and mortalities
of marine mammals for the fishery are
already focused on geographic areas
where interactions pose a significant
risk to specific marine mammal stocks,
rather than implementing broad-brush
regulations that span over large areas
with different variations of interactions.
Comment 22: The Blue Water
Fishermen’s Association recommends
that NMFS support research efforts to
better understand depredation by
marine mammals on hooked catches,
specifically pilot whale interactions.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Blue
Water Fishermen’s Association that
research efforts are important to reduce
marine mammal interactions. The LOF
does not include any funding
mechanisms to support research efforts.
However, we are supporting research
efforts to better understand how to
reduce or prevent serious injuries and
mortalities of marine mammals in the
Atlantic portion of the pelagic longline
fishery. Specifically, we are providing
funding through North Carolina Sea
Grant for cooperative research between
scientists and fishermen to better
understand pilot whale interactions
with the pelagic longline fishery as
described in the Pelagic Longline Take
Reduction Plan. In addition, we are
supporting two research projects in
2013 to evaluate the potential of weak
hooks for reducing serious injury and
mortality of marine mammals, while
maintaining catch for fishermen.
Comment 23: DOI recommends that
NMFS delete the superscript reference
about the level of interaction with the
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery for
the Florida subspecies of the West
Indian manatee because it is erroneous.
The reference reads, ‘‘[F]ishery
classified based on serious injuries and
mortalities of this stock, which are
greater than 50 percent (Category 1) or
greater than 1 percent and less than 50
percent (Category II) of the stock’ s
[potential biological removal] PBR.’’
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Response: NMFS believes that the
footnote regarding the level of
interaction between the Atlantic blue
crab trap/pot fishery and the Florida
subspecies of West Indian manatee is
relevant. This reference is included for
any stock listed under a fishery that has
data showing that serious injuries and
mortalities are greater than 1 percent
and less than 50 percent (Category II) of
the stock’s PBR. In NMFS preliminary
data, the PBR for the West Indian
manatee was 14.98, and three serious
injuries were reported in Atlantic blue
crab pot gear, 20% of the stock’s PBR.
Based on this information, NMFS finds
the footnote to be accurate and will
maintain the footnote reference for the
Florida subspecies of manatee.
Comment 24: DOI recommends that
NMFS remove the Florida subspecies of
the West Indian manatee from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
fishery. DOI is unaware of any manatees
taken in this fishery since 1990.
Response: Notwithstanding the record
of historic takes and low observer
coverage since 1992 (less than 1%),
NMFS will remove the Florida
subspecies of the West Indian manatee
from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery since there
have been no recently documented
takes. Further, the Georgia Department
of Natural Resources and Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission
closely monitor the manatee population,
which allows them to detect the
majority of dead and injured animals.
The last known takes of manatees by
trawl gear were in 1997, as presented in
the 2009 SAR (74 FR 69136, December
30, 2009). Two takes were reported that
year from Georgia waters. One of the
takes was lethal; the other was nonlethal. Also, in 1990, the inshore bait
shrimp fishery was suggested to cause
three unconfirmed manatee mortalities.
The manatee carcass salvage and
recovery program at the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission
coordinates carcass salvage to determine
the cause of death of every reported
dead manatee (up to 400 manatees a
year) (Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission, 2007). In
Georgia, the Department of Natural
Resources works closely with the state
of Florida and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service to monitor impacts to manatees.
Comment 25: The Commission
recommends that NMFS elevate the
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean
commercial passenger fishing vessel
fishery and all other fisheries that could
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
be responsible for observed takes of
bottlenose dolphins from Category III to
Category II until NMFS can reliably
attribute the takes to a specific
fishery(s).
Response: NMFS is currently
reviewing all Category III fisheries and
associated data. Given the large number
of Category III fisheries and the lack of
accessible and detailed information on
many of these fisheries, including the
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean
commercial passenger fishing vessel
fishery, NMFS anticipates this review
will take some time. As noted in the
preamble, fishery fact sheets for all
Category III fisheries are expected to be
completed with the LOF for 2015,
although this timeline may be revised as
this effort progresses.
Comment 26: The Commission
recommends that NMFS keep the
eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal
bottlenose dolphin stock on the lists of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Gulf of Mexico gillnet
fishery and the Gulf of Mexico
menhaden purse seine fishery until five
years of adequate observer coverage data
show otherwise.
Response: The eastern Gulf of Mexico
coastal bottlenose dolphin stock was
removed from the Gulf of Mexico gillnet
fishery because there is little to no
overlap with this fishery. The range of
the eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal
bottlenose dolphin stock extends off the
coast of Florida to the 20 m isobath.
Gillnets are prohibited in Florida state
waters. In Federal waters on the Gulf
side, there are no gillnet fisheries with
the exception of a small fishery for king
mackerel north of the Marquesas’ in the
Florida Keys that fishes an average of 5–
7 days per year. Because the spatial and
temporal overlap of this stock with this
fishery is minimal and there are no
recorded takes, NMFS removed the Gulf
of Mexico coastal bottlenose dolphin
stock from this fishery.
NMFS also removed the eastern Gulf
of Mexico coastal bottlenose dolphin
stock from the Gulf of Mexico
menhaden purse seine fishery because
there is now minimal overlap between
the fishery and the stock’s range.
Historically, the bait fishery for
menhaden occurred along the Florida
panhandle and around Tampa Bay, but
the fishery was curtailed after the
Florida net-ban of 1995 (Gulf States
Marine Fisheries Commission, 2010).
There is now only a very small fishery
for menhaden off the Florida panhandle
in Federal waters. No has been
documented from that fishery.
Comment 27: The Commission
recommends that NMFS keep the Gulf
of Mexico oceanic Gervais beaked whale
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53345
stock on the lists of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in
Atlantic, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline fishery until five
years of adequate observer coverage data
show otherwise.
Response: NMFS will keep the Gulf of
Mexico oceanic Gervais beaked whale
stock on the list of species incidentally
killed or injured by the Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline fishery, because there has not
been adequate observer coverage data
that show otherwise in the five year
(2006–2010) data period used in the
LOF for 2013 analysis.
Comment 28: The Commission
recommends that NMFS keep the
northern Gulf of Mexico continental
shelf bottlenose dolphin stock on the
lists of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in Atlantic, Caribbean,
Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline
fishery until five years of adequate
observer coverage data show otherwise.
Response: The Gulf of Mexico
continental shelf bottlenose dolphin
stock was removed from the Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline fishery because there
has been adequate observer coverage
without any observed takes in the last
five years. The Gulf of Mexico portion
of the pelagic longline fishery has
adequate observer coverage. For
example, in 2011, the average observer
coverage of total longline sets in the
Gulf of Mexico was 17.6% (Garrison and
Stokes, 2012). The last reported take
potentially from this stock was in 2007.
This dolphin was released alive and
presumed to have no serious injuries.
This animal could have belonged to the
continental shelf or oceanic stock.
Comment 29: The Association, Turtle
Island Restoration Network, and Bright
Eye Fish Company request that NMFS
re-evaluate or provide further
explanation of the Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline fishery increase of
estimated number of vessels/persons
from 94 to 420.
Response: NMFS re-evaluated the
compiled permit data to ensure all
duplicated values were removed. The
corrected estimated number of vessels/
persons is 234, based on 2012 permit
data for all Atlantic tuna longline and
incidental and directed swordfish. The
value of 234 represents all unique
vessels that have one of these permits.
Active vessels in a given year may be
less than 234, but we list all permitted
vessels that have the potential to fish in
a given year within the designated
pelagic longline fishery.
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53346
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Comments on Commercial Fisheries on
the High Seas
Comment 30: The Turtle Island
Restoration Network requests an
explanation of why prohibited fishing
gears, such as gillnets on the high seas,
are listed as active fisheries.
Response: As stated in the preamble
supplementary information under
header ‘‘Are high seas fisheries included
on the LOF?’’ HSFCA permits are valid
for five years, during which time FMPs
can change. Therefore, some vessels/
participants may possess valid HSFCA
permits without the ability to fish under
the permit because it was issued for a
gear type that is no longer authorized
under the most current FMP. For this
reason, the number of HSFCA permits
displayed in Table 3 is likely higher
than the actual U.S. fishing effort on the
high seas.
Gillnets are an authorized gear type in
the List of Authorized Fisheries and
Gear in the MSA Provisions (50 CFR
600.725). On the U.S. West Coast, the
thresher shark and swordfish fishery is
authorized to use drift gillnets. Under
the FMP for U.S. West Coast Fisheries
for Highly Migratory Species, drift
gillnet use is banned during certain
seasons in specific portions of the EEZ
off of California and Oregon. An HSFCA
permit is generally associated with at
least one fishery that is authorized by a
Fishery Management Plan. As such gill
netters are still listed as a vessel type in
the HSFCA permit application.
Comment 31: The Association states
that the high seas fishing vessel permit
holders are already included in the
Atlantic, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline vessels/persons
count, so they have been doublecounted in the NMFS estimate of
vessels/permits.
Response: As stated in the preamble
supplementary information under
header ‘‘Are high seas fisheries included
on the LOF,’’ many fisheries operate in
both U.S. waters and on the high seas,
creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and
those in Table 3. In these cases, the high
seas component of the fishery is not
considered a separate fishery, but an
extension of a fishery operating within
U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2).
NMFS designates those fisheries in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ‘‘*’’ after the
fishery’s name. The number of HSFCA
permits listed in Table 3 for the high
seas components of these fisheries
operating in U.S. waters does not
necessarily represent additional effort
that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels/participants holding
HSFCA permits also fish within U.S.
waters and are included in the number
of vessels and participants operating
within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
classification, the estimated number of
vessels/participants in a particular
fishery, the species or stocks that are
incidentally killed or injured in a
particular fishery, and the fisheries that
are subject to a take reduction plan. The
classifications and definitions of U.S.
commercial fisheries for 2013 are
identical to those provided in the LOF
for 2012 with the changes discussed
below. State and regional abbreviations
used in the following paragraphs
include: AK (Alaska), CA (California),
DE (Delaware), FL (Florida), GMX (Gulf
of Mexico), HI (Hawaii), MA
(Massachusetts), ME (Maine), NC (North
Carolina), NY (New York), OR (Oregon),
RI (Rhode Island), SC (South Carolina),
VA (Virginia), WA (Washington), and
WNA (Western North Atlantic).
Summary of Changes From the
Proposed Rule
In this final rule, NMFS updated the
‘‘Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline’’ fishery
vessels/persons value. The revised, final
estimate is 243, down from 420 in the
proposed rule.
In this final rule, NMFS added
Gervais beaked whales (Gulf of Mexico
oceanic) to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
‘‘Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline’’ fishery.
In this final rule, NMFS removed
West Indian manatee (Florida) from the
list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the ‘‘Southeastern
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trawl’’
fishery.
Fishery Classification
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2013
The following summarizes changes to
the LOF for 2013 in fishery
Number of Vessels/Persons
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
NMFS reclassifies the ‘‘CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet’’ fishery
from Category II to Category I.
NMFS reclassifies the ‘‘Alaska Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands Rockfish
trawl’’ fishery from Category III to
Category II.
NMFS reclassifies the ‘‘Alaska Bering
Sea/Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
longline’’ fishery from Category II to
Category III.
NMFS reclassifies the ‘‘Alaska Bering
Sea sablefish pot fishery’’ from Category
II to Category III.
NMFS determined that the ‘‘Hawaii
charter vessel’’ and ‘‘Hawaii trolling,
rod and reel’’ fisheries should remain
classified as Category III fisheries.
NMFS updates the estimated number
of persons/vessels operating in the
Pacific Ocean as follows:
Estimated number
of participants
(Final 2012 LOF)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Category
Fishery
I ................
I ................
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/set line .........................................................................
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet ...........................................................................
AK Bristol Bay Salmon drift gillnet ....................................................................................
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet ......................................................................................
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet ......................................................................................
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine .........................................................................................
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet .............................................................
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet ...........................................................................................
HI shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/set line .............................................................
American Samoa longline .................................................................................................
HI shortline ........................................................................................................................
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet ......................................................................................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline .......................................................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Greenland Turbot longline ............................................
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, Kotzebue salmon gillnet .....................................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring gillnet ......................................................................
AK roe herring and food/bait purse seine .........................................................................
AK salmon purse seine (excluding salmon purse seine fisheries listed as Category II)
AK salmon troll ..................................................................................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline ..............................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
124
45
1862
983
571
370
115
166
28
26
13
476
54
29
824
986
361
936
2045
440
29AUR1
Estimated number
of participants
(Final 2013 LOF)
129
25
1863
982
569
379
114
167
20
24
11
474
154
36
1702
990
367
935
2008
107
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Estimated number
of participants
(Final 2012 LOF)
Category
Fishery
III ..............
III ..............
AK halibut longline/set line (State and Federal waters) ....................................................
AK State-managed waters longline/setline (including sablefish, rockfish, lingcod, and
miscellaneous finfish).
AK miscellaneous finfish otter/beam trawl ........................................................................
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl (statewide and Cook Inlet) ...................................
AK statewide miscellaneous finfish pot .............................................................................
AK BSAI crab pot ..............................................................................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot ................................................................................................
AK southeast Alaska crab pot ...........................................................................................
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot ......................................................................................
AK shrimp pot, except southeast ......................................................................................
AK Octopus/squid pot ........................................................................................................
AK miscellaneous finfish handline/hand troll and mechanical jig .....................................
AK North Pacific halibut handline/hand troll and mechanical jig ......................................
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net ................................................................................
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait pound net ..................................................................
AK urchin and other fish/shellfish ......................................................................................
AK North Pacific halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/OR/CA albacore, groundfish, bottom fish,
CA halibut non-salmonid troll fisheries.
HI inshore gillnet ................................................................................................................
HI opelu/akule net .............................................................................................................
HI inshore purse seine ......................................................................................................
HI throw net, cast net ........................................................................................................
HI hukilau net ....................................................................................................................
HI lobster tangle net ..........................................................................................................
American Samoa tuna troll ................................................................................................
HI trolling, rod and reel ......................................................................................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands tuna troll ..............................................
Guam tuna troll ..................................................................................................................
HI kaka line ........................................................................................................................
HI vertical longline .............................................................................................................
HI crab trap ........................................................................................................................
HI fish trap .........................................................................................................................
HI lobster trap ....................................................................................................................
HI shrimp trap ....................................................................................................................
HI crab net .........................................................................................................................
HI Kona crab loop net .......................................................................................................
American Samoa bottomfish .............................................................................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands bottomfish ............................................
Guam bottomfish ...............................................................................................................
HI aku boat, pole, and line ................................................................................................
HI Main Hawaiian Islands deep-sea bottomfish handline .................................................
HI inshore handline ...........................................................................................................
HI tuna handline ................................................................................................................
Western Pacific squid jig ...................................................................................................
HI bullpen trap ...................................................................................................................
HI black coral diving ..........................................................................................................
HI handpick ........................................................................................................................
HI lobster diving .................................................................................................................
HI spearfishing ...................................................................................................................
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Species or Stocks Incidentally
Killed or Injured in the Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds sperm whales (CA/OR/
WA stock) and bottlenose dolphins (CA/
OR/WA offshore stock) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I ‘‘CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet’’ fishery.
NMFS, further, adds a superscript ‘‘1’’
after sperm whale (CA/OR/WA stock),
indicating that this stock is a driver for
the Category I classification of this
fishery. NMFS, also, removes the
superscript ‘‘1’’ from the humpback
whale (CA/OR/WA stock).
NMFS adds bottlenose dolphins (CA/
OR/WA offshore stock) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category III ‘‘WA/OR/CA
groundfish, bottomfish longline/set
line’’ fishery.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
NMFS makes several changes to the
list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II ‘‘HI
shallow-set (swordfish target) longline’’
fishery. NMFS adds short-finned pilot
whales (Hawaiian stock), removes
Bryde’s whales (Hawaiian stock), and
adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ following false
killer whale (Hawaii pelagic stock), to
indicate the stock is driving the fishery’s
Category II classification. NMFS
removes the superscript ‘‘1’’ following
bottlenose dolphin (Hawaii pelagic
stock), to indicate the stock is no longer
driving the fishery’s Category II
classification.
NMFS removes humpback whales
(Central North Pacific stock) and
Blainville’s beaked whales (Hawaiian
stock) from the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53347
Estimated number
of participants
(Final 2013 LOF)
2521
1448
2280
1323
317
32
293
297
300
433
283
15
27
445
228
415
6
570
1,302 (102 AK)
282
33
243
296
389
415
274
210
26
456
180
411
4
521
1,320 (120 AK)
44
16
5
22
27
1
<50
2,191
88
401
24
10
5
13
1
2
5
46
<50
<50
200
2
569
416
445
6
4
1
61
39
144
36
22
<3
29
26
0
7
1,560
40
432
17
9
9
9
<3
4
6
48
12
28
>300
3
567
378
459
1
<3
<3
57
29
143
Category I ‘‘Hawaii deep-set (tuna target)
longline’’ fishery.
NMFS adds pantropical spotted
dolphins (Hawaii stock) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally injured or
killed in the Category III ‘‘Hawaii
trolling, rod and reel’’ and ‘‘Hawaii
charter vessel’’ fisheries.
NMFS makes several changes to the
list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II
‘‘Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Flatfish trawl’’ fishery. NMFS adds gray
whales (Eastern North Pacific stock),
humpback whales (Western North
Pacific stock), killer whales (Gulf of
Alaska, Aleutian Islands, and Bering Sea
transient stock), and ringed seals
(Alaska stock).
NMFS makes several changes to the
list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53348
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Pollock trawl’’ fishery. NMFS adds
ringed seals (Alaska stock), bearded
seals (Alaska stock), and Northern fur
seals (Eastern Pacific stock). NMFS
removes killer whales (Eastern North
Pacific, Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian Islands,
and Bering Sea transient stock) and
minke whales (Alaska stock).
NMFS makes several changes to the
list of species or stocks incidentally
injured or killed by the Category III
‘‘Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Pacific Cod longline’’ fishery. NMFS
adds Northern fur seals (eastern Pacific
stock) and Dall’s Porpoise (Alaska
stock), and removes Steller sea lions
(Western United States stock), ribbon
seals (Alaska stock), and killer whales
(Alaska Resident stock).
NMFS adds Steller sea lions (Western
United States stock) to the list of species
or stocks incidentally injured or killed
by the Category III ‘‘Gulf of Alaska
Pacific Cod longline’’ fishery.
NMFS removes Steller sea lions
(Eastern United States stock) from the
list of species or stocks incidentally
injured or killed by the Category III
‘‘Gulf of Alaska Sablefish longline’’
fishery.
NMFS removes Steller sea lions
(Eastern United States stock) from the
list of species or stocks incidentally
injured or killed by the Category III
‘‘Alaska Halibut longline’’ fishery.
NMFS adds ribbon seal (Alaska stock)
to the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed by the
Category III ‘‘Atka Mackerel trawl’’
fishery.
NMFS removes harbor seals (Bering
Sea stock) from the list of species or
stocks incidentally injured or killed by
the Category III ‘‘Bering Sea/Aleutian
Islands Pacific Cod trawl’’ fishery.
NMFS removes humpback whales
(Western North Pacific stock) and
(Central North Pacific stock) from the
list of species or stocks incidentally
injured or killed by the Category III
‘‘Alaska Bering Sea sablefish pot’’
fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in commercial
fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean.
Estimated number
of participants
(Final 2012 LOF)
Category
Fishery
I ................
I ................
I ................
I ................
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagic longline ...................................
Northeast Sink Gillnet ........................................................................................................
Mid Atlantic Gillnet .............................................................................................................
Northeast/Mid Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot ...........................................................
North Carolina inshore gillnet ............................................................................................
Southeast Atlantic gillnet ...................................................................................................
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot .................................................................................................
Northeast Anchored Float Gillnet ......................................................................................
Northeast Mid Water Trawl (including pair trawl) ..............................................................
Mid Atlantic Mid Water Trawl (including pair trawl and flynet) .........................................
Mid Atlantic Beach Haul Seine ..........................................................................................
Northeast Bottom Trawl .....................................................................................................
Virginia Pound Net ............................................................................................................
Northeast Drift Gillnet ........................................................................................................
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot .......................................................................................
Mid Atlantic Bottom Trawl .................................................................................................
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet .......................................................................................
Mid Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine .................................................................................
Atlantic Shellfish Bottom Trawl ..........................................................................................
Gulf of Maine Atlantic Herring Purse Seine ......................................................................
Northeast, Mid-Atlantic Bottom Longline/Hook & Line ......................................................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic Sea Scallop Dredge ......................................................
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic mackerel stop seine/weir ...........................................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark swordfish hook-and-line/harpoon ...............
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Species or Stocks Incidentally
Killed or Injured
NMFS removes bottlenose dolphin
(Northern Gulf of Mexico continental
shelf stock) from the list of species or
stocks incidentally injured or killed in
the Category I ‘‘Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline’’ fishery.
NMFS removes bottlenose dolphin
(Eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal stock)
from the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the
Category II ‘‘Gulf of Mexico gillnet’’
fishery.
NMFS removes Atlantic spotted
dolphins (Western North Atlantic stock)
from the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
Category II ‘‘Southeastern U.S. Atlantic
shark gillnet’’ fishery.
NMFS removes bottlenose dolphins
(Eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal stock)
from the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the
Category II ‘‘Gulf of Mexico menhaden
purse seine’’ fishery.
NMFS removes dwarf sperm whales
(Western North Atlantic stock) from the
list of species or stocks incidentally
injured or killed in the Category III
‘‘Caribbean gillnet’’ fishery.
NMFS adds bottlenose dolphin
(Southern South Carolina/Georgia
coastal stock) to the list of species or
stocks incidentally injured or killed in
the Category III ‘‘Georgia cannonball
jellyfish trawl’’ fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
94
3,828
6,402
11,767
2,250
779
10,008
414
887
669
874
2,584
231
414
3,526
1,388
3,328
56
>86
>6
>1,281
>230
Unknown
>403
Estimated number
of participants
(Final 2013 LOF)
420
4,375
5,509
11,693
1,323
357
8,557
421
1,103
322
565
2,987
67
311
3,467
631
1,126
5
>58
>7
>1,207
>403
>1
428
NMFS adds minke whales (Canadian
East Coast stock) to the list of species or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II ‘‘Northeast bottom trawl’’
fishery.
NMFS adds Risso’s dolphins (Western
North Atlantic stock) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I ‘‘Mid-Atlantic
gillnet’’ fishery.
NMFS adds long-finned pilot whales
(Western North Atlantic stock) and
short-finned pilot whales (Western
North Atlantic stock) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I ‘‘Northeast sink
gillnet’’ fishery.
NMFS adds common dolphins
(Western North Atlantic stock) and gray
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
seals (Western North Atlantic stock) to
the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II
‘‘Northeast mid-water trawl’’ fishery.
NMFS adds gray seals (Western North
Atlantic stock) to the list of species
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II ‘‘Mid-Atlantic bottom
trawl’’ fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of HSFCA permits in multiple high seas
fisheries for multiple gear types (Table
3). The updated numbers of HSFCA
permits reflect the current number of
permits in the NMFS National Permit
System database.
Number of
HSFCA permits
(Final 2012 LOF)
Category
High Seas Fishery
I ................
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
II ...............
III ..............
III ..............
III ..............
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Longline .......................................................................
Atlantic HMS Drift Gillnet ...................................................................................................
Pacific HMS Drift Gillnet ....................................................................................................
Atlantic HMS Trawl ............................................................................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic Trawl ...........................................................................................
South Pacific Tuna Purse Seine .......................................................................................
South Pacific Tuna Longline .............................................................................................
Pacific HMS Handline/Pole and Line ................................................................................
South Pacific Albacore Handline/Pole and Line ...............................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic Handline/Pole and Line ..............................................................
Atlantic HMS Troll ..............................................................................................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ..............................................................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic Troll ............................................................................................
Pacific HMS Longline ........................................................................................................
Pacific HMS Purse Seine ..................................................................................................
Pacific HMS Troll ...............................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Species or Stocks Incidentally
Killed or Injured in High Seas Fisheries
(Table 3)
NMFS removes humpback whales
(Central North Pacific stock) and
Blainville’s beaked whales (Hawaiian
and unknown stocks) from the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the ‘‘Western Pacific Pelagic
(HI Deep-set component)’’ fishery.
NMFS removes Bryde’s whales
(Hawaiian and unknown stocks) and
adds short-finned pilot whales
(Hawaiian and unknown stocks) to the
list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the ‘‘Western Pacific
Pelagic (HI Shallow-set component)’’
fishery.
Fisheries Affected by Take Reduction
Teams and Plans
NMFS updates the list of fisheries
affected by take reduction teams and
plans found in Table 4 of the LOF.
In the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean region, two updates are made:
The Atlantic portion of the
‘‘Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery’’ is subject
to the Bottlenose Dolphin Take
Reduction Plan (BDTRP), and the
‘‘Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery’’ is also subject to the BDTRP.
In the Pacific Ocean region, NMFS
adds ‘‘False Killer Whale Take
Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)—50 CFR
229.37’’ to the list of take reduction
plans. Affected fisheries include the
Category I ‘‘Hawaii deep-set (tuna target)
longline/set line’’ and Category II
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
‘‘Hawaii shallow-set (swordfish target)
longline/set line’’ fisheries.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list
of U.S. commercial fisheries according
to their classification under section 118
of the MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including
Alaska); Table 2 lists commercial
fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean; Table 3 lists
commercial fisheries on the high seas;
and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated
number of vessels/persons participating
in fisheries operating within U.S. waters
is expressed in terms of the number of
active participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not
available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a
particular fishery is provided, which
represents a measure of potential effort.
If no recent information is available on
the number of participants, vessels, or
persons licensed in a fishery, then the
number from the most recent LOF is
used for the estimated number of
vessels/persons in the fishery. NMFS
acknowledges that, in some cases, these
estimations may be inflations of actual
effort, such as for many of the MidAtlantic and New England fisheries.
However, in these cases, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each
fishery, given the multiple gear types
several state permits may allow for.
Changes made to Mid-Atlantic and New
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53349
81
1
3
3
1
33
11
30
8
8
7
51
32
84
7
258
Number of
HSFCA permits
(Final 2013 LOF)
79
2
4
5
0
38
10
40
7
6
5
36
22
96
6
263
England fishery participants will not
affect observer coverage or bycatch
estimates as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel
trip reports and landings data. For
additional information on fishing effort
in fisheries found on Table 1 or 2,
NMFS refers the reader to contact the
relevant regional office (contact
information included above in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists
the number of currently valid HSFCA
permits held. Although this likely
overestimates the number of active
participants in many of these fisheries,
the number of valid HSFCA permits is
the most reliable data on the potential
effort in high seas fisheries at this time.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine
mammal species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in each fishery based
on observer data, logbook data,
stranding reports, disentanglement
network data, and MMAP reports. This
list includes all species or stocks known
to be injured or killed in a given fishery
but also includes species or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of an
injury or mortality. Additionally,
species identified by logbook entries,
stranding data, or fishermen self-reports
(i.e., MMAP reports) may not be
verified. In Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has
designated those stocks driving a
fishery’s classification (i.e., the fishery
is classified based on serious injuries
and mortalities of a marine mammal
stock that are greater than 50 percent
[Category I], or greater than 1 percent
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53350
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
and less than 50 percent [Category II], of
a stock’s PBR) by a ‘‘1’’ after the stock’s
name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several
fisheries classified as Category II that
have no recent documented injuries or
mortalities of marine mammals, or
fisheries that did not result in a serious
injury or mortality rate greater than 1
percent of a stock’s PBR level based on
known interactions. NMFS has
classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that
are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of marine mammals, as discussed
in the final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063,
December 28, 1995), and according to
factors listed in the definition of a
‘‘Category II fishery’’ in 50 CFR 229.2
(i.e., fishing techniques, gear used,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or fisher
reports, stranding data, and the species
and distribution of marine mammals in
the area). NMFS has designated those
fisheries listed by analogy in Tables 1
and 2 by a ‘‘2’’ after the fishery’s name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1,
2, and 3 in which a portion of the
fishing vessels cross the EEZ boundary
and therefore operate both within U.S.
waters and on the high seas. These
fisheries, though listed separately
between Table 1 or 2 and Table 3, are
considered the same fishery on either
side of the EEZ boundary. NMFS has
designated those fisheries in each table
by a ‘‘*’’ after the fishery’s name.
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Category I
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/set line *∧ ....
129 .........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic
False killer whale, HI Insular 1
False killer whale, HI Pelagic 1
False killer whale, Palmyra Atoll
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI
Risso’s dolphin, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Striped dolphin, HI
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14
in mesh) *.
25 ...........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore
California sea lion, U.S.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA 1
Category II
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA halibut/white seabass and other species
set gillnet (≤3.5 in mesh).
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet (mesh size ≥3.5 in and <14 in) 2.
50 ...........................................................
California sea lion, U.S.
30 ...........................................................
Harbor seal, CA
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding
Sea otter, CA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
California sea lion, U.S.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet 2 ..................
1,863 ......................................................
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet 2 ...................
982 .........................................................
AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet ...........................
188 .........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1
Harbor seal, GOA
Sea otter, Southwest AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
53351
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet ......................
738 .........................................................
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet .....................
569 .........................................................
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift
gillnet 2.
162 .........................................................
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA
Harbor seal, GOA
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1
Harbor seal, GOA
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set
gillnet 2.
114 .........................................................
Harbor porpoise, GOA
Harbor seal, GOA
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea
AK Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet ...
537 .........................................................
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet .....................
474 .........................................................
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet 2 ........................
167 .........................................................
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet
(includes all inland waters south of US-Canada border and eastward of the BonillaTatoosh line-Treaty Indian fishing is excluded).
210 .........................................................
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1
Harbor seal, GOA
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific
Sea otter, South Central AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S. 1
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, Southeast AK
Harbor seal, Southeast AK
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor porpoise, Southeastern AK
Harbor seal, Southeast AK
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK)
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA
Harbor porpoise, inland WA 1
Harbor seal, WA inland
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine ...................
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine ........................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands flatfish trawl ..
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands pollock trawl
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
82 ...........................................................
379 .........................................................
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1
34 ...........................................................
Bearded seal, AK
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific 1
Killer whale, AK resident 1
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient 1
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Ringed seal, AK
Ribbon seal, AK
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S. 1
Walrus, AK
Bearded seal, AK
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor seal, AK
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Ribbon seal, AK
Ringed seal, AK
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S. 1
95 ...........................................................
Frm 00115
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53352
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl ......
28 ...........................................................
Killer whale, ENP AK resident 1
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient 1
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP FISHERIES:
CA spot prawn pot ............................................
27 ...........................................................
CA Dungeness crab pot ...................................
534 .........................................................
OR Dungeness crab pot ...................................
433 .........................................................
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot ..................................
WA coastal Dungeness crab pot/trap ..............
309 .........................................................
228 .........................................................
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/set
line *∧.
20 ...........................................................
American Samoa longline 2 ..............................
24 ...........................................................
HI shortline 2 .....................................................
11 ...........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic
False killer whale, HI Pelagic 1
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific
Kogia sp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale),
HI
Risso’s dolphin, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Striped dolphin, HI
False killer whale, American Samoa
Rough-toothed dolphin, American Samoa
None documented
Category III
1702 .......................................................
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea
3 .............................................................
30 ...........................................................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring gillnet .....
CA set gillnet (mesh size <3.5 in) ....................
HI inshore gillnet ...............................................
990 .........................................................
304 .........................................................
36 ...........................................................
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet (excluding treaty Tribal fishing).
WA/OR herring, smelt, shad, sturgeon, bottom
fish, mullet, perch, rockfish gillnet.
WA/OR lower Columbia River (includes tributaries) drift gillnet.
24 ...........................................................
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Harbor seal, GOA
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Spinner dolphin, HI
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
913 .........................................................
None documented
110 .........................................................
California sea lion, U.S.
WA Willapa Bay drift gillnet ..............................
82 ...........................................................
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding
PURSE SEINE, BEACH SEINE, ROUND HAUL,
THROW NET AND TANGLE NET FISHERIES:
AK Southeast salmon purse seine ...................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
GILLNET FISHERIES:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound,
Kotzebue salmon gillnet.
AK miscellaneous finfish set gillnet ..................
AK Prince William Sound salmon set gillnet ....
415 .........................................................
AK Metlakatla salmon purse seine ...................
AK miscellaneous finfish beach seine ..............
AK miscellaneous finfish purse seine ..............
AK octopus/squid purse seine ..........................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring beach
seine.
AK roe herring and food/bait herring purse
seine.
AK salmon beach seine ...................................
AK salmon purse seine (excluding salmon
purse seine fisheries listed as Category II).
CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine ...
10 ...........................................................
1 .............................................................
2 .............................................................
0 .............................................................
6 .............................................................
None documented in the most recent 5 years of
data
None documented
None documented
None documented
None documented
None documented
367 .........................................................
None documented
31 ...........................................................
935 .........................................................
None documented
Harbor seal, GOA
65 ...........................................................
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, CA
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA Short-beaked
common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
None documented
None documented
None documented
None documented
CA squid purse seine .......................................
80 ...........................................................
CA tuna purse seine * .......................................
WA/OR sardine purse seine .............................
WA (all species) beach seine or drag seine ....
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid purse seine or
lampara.
10 ...........................................................
42 ...........................................................
235 .........................................................
130 .........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
53353
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
WA salmon purse seine ...................................
WA salmon reef net ..........................................
HI opelu/akule net ............................................
HI inshore purse seine .....................................
HI throw net, cast net .......................................
HI hukilau net ...................................................
HI lobster tangle net .........................................
DIP NET FISHERIES:
CA squid dip net ...............................................
WA/OR smelt, herring dip net ..........................
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
CA marine shellfish aquaculture ......................
CA salmon enhancement rearing pen .............
CA white seabass enhancement net pens ......
HI offshore pen culture .....................................
OR salmon ranch .............................................
WA/OR salmon net pens ..................................
440 .........................................................
53 ...........................................................
22 ...........................................................
<3 ..........................................................
29 ...........................................................
26 ...........................................................
0 .............................................................
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
115 .........................................................
119 .........................................................
None documented
None documented
unknown ................................................
>1 ..........................................................
13 ...........................................................
2 .............................................................
1 .............................................................
14 ...........................................................
None documented
None documented
California sea lion, U.S.
None documented
None documented
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, WA inland waters
1,320 (120 AK) ......................................
None documented
2,008 ......................................................
7 .............................................................
4,300 ......................................................
1,560 ......................................................
40 ...........................................................
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented
None documented
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI
None documented
432 .........................................................
None documented
154 .........................................................
0 .............................................................
Dall’s Porpoise, AK
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
None documented
36 ...........................................................
Killer whale, AK resident
28 ...........................................................
None documented
1,302 ......................................................
107 .........................................................
0 .............................................................
291 .........................................................
2,280 ......................................................
2 .............................................................
1,323 ......................................................
None documented
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented
Sperm whale, North Pacific
None documented in the most recent 5 years of
data
None documented
None documented
367 .........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore
350 .........................................................
6 .............................................................
None documented
None documented in the most recent 5 years of
data
None documented
None documented
TROLL FISHERIES:
AK North Pacific halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/
OR/CA albacore, groundfish, bottom fish,
CA halibut non-salmonid troll fisheries *.
AK salmon troll .................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
American Samoa tuna troll ...............................
CA/OR/WA salmon troll ....................................
HI trolling, rod and reel .....................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands tuna troll.
Guam tuna troll .................................................
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Greenland
turbot longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish
longline.
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut longline ....................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline .............
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish longline ..................
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline ................
AK halibut longline/set line (State and Federal
waters).
AK octopus/squid longline ................................
AK State-managed waters longline/setline (including sablefish, rockfish, lingcod, and miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set
line.
WA/OR North Pacific halibut longline/set line ..
CA pelagic longline ...........................................
HI kaka line .......................................................
HI vertical longline ............................................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel trawl.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
trawl.
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl .........................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl .................
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock trawl ........................
17 ...........................................................
9 .............................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl .......................
AK food/bait herring trawl .................................
AK miscellaneous finfish otter/beam trawl .......
34 ...........................................................
4 .............................................................
282 .........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
9 .............................................................
93 ...........................................................
41 ...........................................................
62 ...........................................................
62 ...........................................................
Frm 00117
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
Ribbon seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Northern elephant seal, NP
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented
None documented
None documented
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53354
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl (statewide and Cook Inlet).
AK State-managed waters of Cook Inlet,
Kachemak Bay, Prince William Sound,
Southeast AK groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl ....................................
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl ...................................
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl .............................
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
33 ...........................................................
None documented
2 .............................................................
None documented
53 ...........................................................
300 .........................................................
160–180 .................................................
None documented
None documented
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
243 .........................................................
8 .............................................................
68 ...........................................................
None documented
None documented
None documented
296 .........................................................
6 .............................................................
389 .........................................................
154 .........................................................
415 .........................................................
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot .....................
274 .........................................................
AK shrimp pot, except Southeast .....................
AK octopus/squid pot .......................................
AK snail pot ......................................................
CA coonstripe shrimp, rock crab, tanner crab
pot or trap.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP FISHERIES:
AK statewide miscellaneous finfish pot ............
AK Aleutian Islands sablefish pot .....................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands crab pot ........
AK Bering Sea sablefish pot ............................
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot ...............................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot ....................
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot .........................
210 .........................................................
26 ...........................................................
1 .............................................................
305 .........................................................
None documented
None documented
None documented
Harbor seal, GOA
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK)
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK)
None documented
None documented
None documented
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
CA spiny lobster ...............................................
OR/CA hagfish pot or trap ................................
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap ....................................
WA Puget Sound Dungeness crab pot/trap .....
HI crab trap .......................................................
HI fish trap ........................................................
HI lobster trap ...................................................
HI shrimp trap ...................................................
HI crab net ........................................................
HI Kona crab loop net ......................................
HANDLINE AND JIG FISHERIES:
AK miscellaneous finfish handline/hand troll
and mechanical jig.
AK North Pacific halibut handline/hand troll
and mechanical jig.
AK octopus/squid handline ...............................
American Samoa bottomfish ............................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish ..............................................
HI aku boat, pole, and line ...............................
HI Main Hawaiian Islands deep-sea bottomfish
handline.
HI inshore handline ..........................................
HI tuna handline ...............................................
WA groundfish, bottomfish jig ..........................
Western Pacific squid jig ..................................
HARPOON FISHERIES:
CA swordfish harpoon ......................................
POUND NET/WEIR FISHERIES:
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net ...............
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait pound net
WA herring brush weir ......................................
HI bullpen trap ..................................................
BAIT PENS:
WA/OR/CA bait pens ........................................
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Coastwide scallop dredge ................................
225 .........................................................
54 ...........................................................
254 .........................................................
249 .........................................................
9 .............................................................
9 .............................................................
<3 ..........................................................
4 .............................................................
6 .............................................................
48 ...........................................................
Harbor seal, CA
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
None documented
None documented
None documented
None documented
None documented
Hawaiian monk seal
None documented
None documented
None documented
456 .........................................................
None documented
180 .........................................................
None documented
0 .............................................................
12 ...........................................................
28 ...........................................................
None documented
None documented
None documented
>300 ......................................................
3 .............................................................
567 .........................................................
None documented
None documented
Hawaiian monk seal
378 .........................................................
459 .........................................................
679 .........................................................
<3 ..........................................................
None
None
None
None
30 ...........................................................
None documented
411 .........................................................
4 .............................................................
1 .............................................................
<3 ..........................................................
None
None
None
None
13 ...........................................................
California sea lion, U.S.
108 (12 AK) ...........................................
None documented
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
53355
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL COLLECTION FISHERIES:
AK abalone .......................................................
AK clam ............................................................
WA herring spawn on kelp ...............................
AK Dungeness crab .........................................
AK herring spawn on kelp ................................
AK urchin and other fish/shellfish .....................
CA abalone .......................................................
CA sea urchin ...................................................
HI black coral diving .........................................
HI fish pond ......................................................
HI handpick .......................................................
HI lobster diving ................................................
HI spearfishing ..................................................
WA/CA kelp ......................................................
WA/OR sea urchin, other clam, octopus, oyster, sea cucumber, scallop, ghost shrimp
hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
WA shellfish aquaculture ..................................
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSEL
(CHARTER BOAT) FISHERIES:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger fishing
vessel.
HI charter vessel ..............................................
LIVE FINFISH/SHELLFISH FISHERIES:
CA nearshore finfish live trap/hook-and-line ....
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
0 .............................................................
156 .........................................................
4 .............................................................
2 .............................................................
266 .........................................................
521 .........................................................
0 .............................................................
583 .........................................................
<3 ..........................................................
16 ...........................................................
57 ...........................................................
29 ...........................................................
143 .........................................................
4 .............................................................
637 .........................................................
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
documented
684 .........................................................
None documented
>7,000 (2,702 AK) .................................
Killer whale, stock unknown
114 .........................................................
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI
93 ...........................................................
None documented
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AK—Alaska; CA—California; GOA—Gulf of Alaska; HI—Hawaii; OR—Oregon; WA—
Washington; 1 Fishery classified based on serious injuries and mortalities of this stock, which are greater than 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR; 2 Fishery classified by analogy; * Fishery has an associated high seas
component listed in Table 3; ∧ The list of marine mammal species or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of species or
stocks killed or injured in high seas component of the fishery, minus species or stocks have geographic ranges exclusively on the high seas. The
species or stocks are found, and the fishery remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the EEZ components of these
fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components operating on the high seas.∧
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Category I
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet ............................................
5,509 ......................................................
Northeast sink gillnet ........................................
4,375 ......................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian east coast
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Fin whale, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF 1
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Hooded seal, WNA
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53356
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
Long-finned Pilot whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian east coast
North Atlantic right whale, WNA
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned Pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/
pot.
11,693 ....................................................
Harbor seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
Minke whale, Canadian east coast
North Atlantic right whale, WNA 1
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline*.
234 .........................................................
Atlantic spotted dolphin, GMX continental and
oceanic
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA
Gervais beaked whale, GMX oceanic
Killer whale, GMX oceanic
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA 1
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA
Northern bottlenose whale, WNA
Pantropical spotted dolphin, Northern GMX
Pantropical spotted dolphin, WNA
Risso’s dolphin, Northern GMX
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, Northern GMX
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA 1
Sperm whale, GMX oceanic
Category II
1,126 ......................................................
Gulf of Mexico gillnet 2 ......................................
724 .........................................................
NC inshore gillnet .............................................
1,323 ......................................................
Northeast anchored float gillnet 2 .....................
421 .........................................................
Northeast drift gillnet 2 ......................................
Southeast Atlantic gillnet 2 ................................
311 .........................................................
357 .........................................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet ...........
30 ...........................................................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair
trawl).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet 2 ....................
322 .........................................................
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl ..................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
631 .........................................................
Frm 00120
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
None documented in the most recent 5 years of
data
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, and estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system 1
Harbor seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
White-sided dolphin, WNA
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal
North Atlantic right whale, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA 1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA 1
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor seal, WNA
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
53357
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
1,103 ......................................................
Northeast bottom trawl .....................................
2,987 ......................................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
shrimp trawl.
4,950 ......................................................
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
stone crab trap/pot 2.
1,282 ......................................................
3,467 ......................................................
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot ................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot 2 ......................
8,557 ......................................................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine ............
40–42 .....................................................
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine 2 ...............
5 .............................................................
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine ..........................
565 .........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA 1
Risso’s dolphin, WNA 1
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA 1
White-sided dolphin, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor seal, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA 1
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA 1
Common dolphin, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian East Coast
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA 1
Atlantic spotted dolphin, GMX continental and
oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine
(FL west coast portion)
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal
Fin whale, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/Southern SC
estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern GA estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system 1
West Indian manatee, FL 1
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
GMX bay, sound, estuarine
Northern GMX coastal 1
Western GMX coastal 1
Northern Migratory coastal
Southern Migratory coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53358
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
NC long haul seine ...........................................
372 .........................................................
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
tem
Bottlenose
tem 1
dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal 1
dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal 1
dolphin, Southern NC estuarine sysdolphin, Northern NC estuarine sys-
STOP NET FISHERIES:
NC roe mullet stop net .....................................
13 ...........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system 1
POUND NET FISHERIES:
VA pound net ...................................................
67 ...........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal 1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal 1
Category III
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Caribbean gillnet ...............................................
>991 ......................................................
DE River inshore gillnet ....................................
unknown ................................................
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet ....................
unknown ................................................
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), and NY
Bight (Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore
gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore gillnet .....................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl ...........................
Gulf of Mexico butterfish trawl ..........................
unknown ................................................
None documented
data
None documented
data
None documented
data
None documented
data
unknown ................................................
in the most recent 5 years of
in the most recent 5 years of
in the most recent 5 years of
None documented
>58 ........................................................
2 .............................................................
in the most recent 5 years of
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trawl .................
GA cannonball jellyfish trawl ............................
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
Finfish aquaculture ...........................................
Shellfish aquaculture ........................................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic herring purse seine .......
20 ...........................................................
1 .............................................................
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental
shelf
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin, South Carolina/Georgia
48 ...........................................................
unknown ................................................
Harbor seal, WNA
None documented
>7 ..........................................................
Gulf of Maine menhaden purse seine ..............
FL West Coast sardine purse seine .................
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse seine * .......................
>2 ..........................................................
10 ...........................................................
5 .............................................................
Harbor seal, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
>1,207 ...................................................
None documented
428 .........................................................
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
>5,000 ...................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf
<125 ......................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
1,446 ......................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental
shelf
None documented
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
LONGLINE/HOOK–AND–LINE FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic bottom longline/hookand-line.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark
swordfish hook-and-line/harpoon.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean snapper-grouper and other
reef fish bottom longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
shark bottom longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean pelagic hook-and-line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trotline ................
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot ....................
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot ......................
FL spiny lobster trap/pot ...................................
unknown ................................................
None documented
>501 ......................................................
>197 ......................................................
1,268 ......................................................
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot .....................
4,113 ......................................................
None documented
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Bottlenose dolphin,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Biscayne Bay estuarine
Central FL coastal
Eastern GMX coastal
FL Bay estuarine
Western GMX coastal
Northern GMX coastal
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
53359
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Fishery description
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trap/pot .............
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
golden crab trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot ...........................
STOP
SEINE/WEIR/POUND
NET/FLOATING
TRAP FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic mackerel
stop seine/weir.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop seine/weir .............
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/
weir/pound net (except the NC roe mullet
stop net).
RI floating trap ..................................................
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine mussel dredge ...........................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic sea scallop
dredge.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico oyster dredge
U.S. Mid-Atlantic offshore surf clam and quahog dredge.
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Caribbean haul/beach seine .............................
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach seine ......................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic haul/beach seine ...
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL COLLECTION FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean
shellfish dive, hand/mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, hand/mechanical
collection.
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, and Caribbean cast net.
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSEL
(CHARTER BOAT) FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean
commercial passenger fishing vessel.
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured
unknown ................................................
10 ...........................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine
West Indian manatee, FL
None documented
None documented
unknown ................................................
None documented
>1 ..........................................................
Gray seal, WNA
2,600 ......................................................
unknown ................................................
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian east coast
White-sided dolphin, WNA
None documented
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system
9 .............................................................
None documented
unknown ................................................
>403 ......................................................
None documented
None documented
7,000 ......................................................
unknown ................................................
None documented
None documented
15 ...........................................................
unknown ................................................
25 ...........................................................
None documented in the most recent 5 years of
data
None documented
None documented
20,000 ....................................................
None documented
unknown ................................................
None documented
unknown ................................................
None documented
4,000 ......................................................
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2: DE—Delaware; FL—Florida; GA—Georgia; GME/BF—Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX—
Gulf of Mexico; MA—Massachusetts; NC—North Carolina; SC- South Carolina; VA—Virginia; WNA—Western North Atlantic; 1 Fishery classified
based on serious injuries and mortalities of this stock, which are greater than 50 percent (Category I) or greater than 1 percent and less than 50
percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR; 2 Fishery classified by analogy; * Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed or
injured
# of HSFCA permits
Category I
LONGLINE FISHERIES:.
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species * + ..........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00123
79
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53360
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS—Continued
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed or
injured
# of HSFCA permits
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Deep-set component) *∧
+.
124
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA
Pygmy sperm whale, WNA
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
False killer whale, HI Pelagic
False killer whale, unknown
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI
Pantropical spotted dolphin, unknown
Risso’s dolphin, HI
Risso’s dolphin, unknown
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, unknown
Striped dolphin, HI
Striped dolphin, unknown
Category II
DRIFT GILLNET FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species *∧ .............................
2
4
5
0
0
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ** ............................
CCAMLR ......................................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries .......................................
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
POT VESSEL FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species ** .............................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
CCAMLR ......................................................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ........................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ** ...................................
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Shallow-set component)
*∧ +.
Undetermined
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Undetermined
Antarctic fur seal
Undetermined
38
3
Undetermined
Undetermined
3
3
3
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
0
11
10
28
None documented
Undetermined
Undetermined
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific
Kogia sp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), HI
Kogia sp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), unknown
Risso’s dolphin, HI
Risso’s dolphin, unknown
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, unknown
Striped dolphin, HI
Striped dolphin, unknown
HANDLINE/POLE AND LINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
TROLL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ........................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ** ...................................
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
LINERS NEI FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species ** .............................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ........................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00124
3
40
7
6
5
36
3
22
Sfmt 4700
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
1
1
Fmt 4700
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
53361
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS—Continued
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed or
injured
# of HSFCA permits
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
FACTORY MOTHERSHIP FISHERIES:
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
MULTIPURPOSE VESSELS NEI FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species ** .............................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic ...............................................
1
Undetermined
1
Undetermined
1
5
4
4
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
Undetermined
Category III
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * + ...........................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species *∧ ............................
96
0
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ∧ ............................
TROLL FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ...............................
6
263
None documented in the most recent 5 years of data
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
None documented
None documented
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3:
GMX—Gulf of Mexico; NEI—Not Elsewhere Identified; WNA—Western North Atlantic.
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits listed in
Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high seas component of the fishery.
** These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004), the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna
Treaty license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because HSFCA permits are valid for five years, permits obtained in past years
exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are now unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear types, it
does not represent effort. In order to land fish species, fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for unauthorized gear
types expire, the permit-holder will be required to obtain a permit for an authorized gear type.
+ The marine mammal species or stocks listed as killed or injured in this fishery has been observed taken by this fishery on the high seas.
∧ The list of marine mammal species or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal species or stocks killed
or injured in U.S. waters component of the fishery, minus species or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively in coastal waters, because
the marine mammal species or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the same on both sides of the EEZ boundary.
Therefore, the high seas components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components of these fisheries operating
in U.S. waters.
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP)—
50 CFR 229.32.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP)—50
CFR 229.35.
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)—50
CFR 229.37.
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan (HPTRP)—50
CFR 229.33 (New England) and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic).
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan (PLTRP)—50 CFR
229.36.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
Northeast sink gillnet
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
Northeast anchored float gillnet
Northeast drift gillnet
Southeast Atlantic gillnet
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet *
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot ∧
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine
NC inshore gillnet
NC long haul seine
NC roe mullet stop net
Southeast Atlantic gillnet
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl ∧
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot ∧
VA pound net
Category I
HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/set line
Category II
HI shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/set line
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet
Northeast sink gillnet
Category I
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline
Frm 00125
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53362
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS—Continued
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan
(POCTRP)—50 CFR 229.31.
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Team (ATGTRT) .....
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Team (FKWTRT) ......
Category II
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh)
Category II
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
Northeast bottom trawl
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
Category I
HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/set line
Category II
HI shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/set line
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S. waters;
Ocean;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration at the
proposed rule state that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. No comments were received on
that certification and no new
information has been discovered to
change that conclusion. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required
and none has been prepared.
This rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The
collection of information for the
registration of individuals under the
MMPA has been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
under OMB control number 0648–0293
(0.15 hours per report for new
registrants and 0.09 hours per report for
renewals). The requirement for
reporting marine mammal injuries or
mortalities has been approved by OMB
under OMB control number 0648–0292
(0.15 hours per report). These estimates
include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding these
reporting burden estimates or any other
aspect of the collections of information,
including suggestions for reducing
burden, to NMFS and OMB (see
ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
∧
Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in the Atlantic
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA)
was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for
regulations to implement section 118 of
the MMPA in June 1995. NMFS revised
that EA relative to classifying U.S.
commercial fisheries on the LOF in
December 2005. Both the 1995 EA and
the 2005 EA concluded that
implementation of MMPA section 118
regulations would not have a significant
impact on the human environment. This
rule would not make any significant
change in the management of
reclassified fisheries; therefore, this rule
is not expected to change the analysis or
conclusion of the 2005 EA. The Council
of Environmental Quality (CEQ)
recommends agencies review EAs every
five years; therefore, NMFS reviewed
the 2005 EA in 2009. NMFS concluded
that, because there have been no
changes to the process used to develop
the LOF and implement section 118 of
the MMPA (including no new
alternatives and no additional or new
impacts on the human environment),
there is no need to update the 2005 EA
at this time. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would first prepare an
environmental document, as required
under NEPA, specific to that action.
This rule would not affect species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) or their associated critical habitat.
The impacts of numerous fisheries have
been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this rule will not affect
the conclusions of those opinions. The
classification of fisheries on the LOF is
not considered to be a management
action that would adversely affect
threatened or endangered species. If
NMFS takes a management action, for
example, through the development of a
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
TRP, NMFS would conduct consultation
under ESA section 7 for that action.
This rule would have no adverse
impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine
mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries
interacting with marine mammals
through information collected from
observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or
water uses or natural resources of the
coastal zone, as specified under section
307 of the Coastal Zone Management
Act.
References
Baker, J.D., A.L. Harting, T.A. Wurth, and
T.C. Johanos. 2011. Dramatic shifts in
Hawaiian monk seal distribution predicted
from divergent regional trends. Marine
Mammal Science 27: 78–93.
Carretta, J.V. and L. Enriquez. 2012. Marine
mammal and seabird bycatch in California
gillnet fisheries in 2010. NOAA SWFSC
and SWR Administrative Report LJ–12–01.
15p.
Carretta, J.V., K.A. Forney, M.S. Lowry, J.
Barlow, J. Baker, D. Johnston, B. Hanson,
M.M. Muto, D. Lynch, L. Carswell. 2009.
U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments: 2008. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
SWFSC–434. 340p.
Carretta, J.V., E. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R.
Lang, K.A. Forney, J. Baker, B. Hanson, K
Martien, M.M. Muto, M.S. Lowry, J.
Barlow, D. Lynch, L. Carswell, R.L.
Brownell Jr., D.K. Mattila, and M.C. Hill.
2012. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments: 2012. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
SWFSC–504. 378p.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission. 2007. Florida Manatee
Management Plan. Available at: https://
myfwc.com/media/214332/manatee_
mgmt_plan.pdf.
Garrison, L.P. and L. Stokes. 2012 Estimated
bycatch of marine mammals and sea turtles
in the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fleet
during 2011. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA NMFS–SEFSC–632.
61 p.
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission.
2010. Bait Fishery. Available at: https://
menhaden.gsfmc.org/2010/
%20Bait%20Fishery.shtm.
Hatfield B.B, J.A. Ames, J.A. Estes, M.T.
Tinker, A.B. Johnson, M.M Staedler, M.D.
Harris. 2011. Sea otter mortality in fish and
shellfish traps: estimating potential
impacts and exploring possible solutions.
Endangered Species Research. 13: 219–229.
McCracken, M.L. 2010. Adjustments to false
killer whale and short-finned pilot whale
bycatch estimates. PIFSC Working Paper
WP–10–007. Pacific Islands Fisheries
Science Center, National Marine Fisheries
Service. 23p.
McCracken, M.L. 2011. Assessment of
incidental interactions with marine
mammals in the Hawaii longline deep and
shallow set fisheries from 2006 through
2010. PIFSC Working Paper WP–11–012.
Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center,
National Marine Fisheries Service. 30p.
Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center,
Fisheries Monitoring Branch. 2012. The
Hawaii-based longline logbook summary
report, January-December 2011. NMFS,
Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center
Data report DR–12–003. 14p.
Dated: August 22, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–21054 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120814336–3739–04]
RINs 0648–BC27, 0648–BC97, and 0648–
XC240
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Framework
Adjustment 48, Framework Adjustment
50; 2013 Sector Operations Plans,
Contracts, and Allocation Annual
Catch Entitlements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
23:18 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
ACTION:
Final rule.
This final rule finalizes
interim measures put in place for the
May 1, 2013, start of the Northeast (NE)
multispecies fishing year. This action
intends to do the following: Finalize
interim rule measures put in place by
Framework Adjustment (FW) 48, FW 50,
and in the 2013 Sector Operations Plan
rulemakings; respond to public
comments received on the interim
measures; and notify the public of
changes being made to Eastern U.S./
Canada Area quota monitoring and
associated reporting requirements.
DATES: Effective September 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Copies of Frameworks 48
and 50, Sector Operations Plans,
associated emergency rules, and other
measures, the environmental
assessments (EAs), its Regulatory Impact
Reviews (RIRs), and the Final
Regulatory Flexibility Act (FRFA)
analyses prepared by the Council and
NMFS are available from John K.
Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS
Northeast Regional Office (NERO), 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. The FRFA analyses consist of the
FRFA, public comments and responses,
and the summary of impacts and
alternatives contained in the previously
published interim rules. The previously
listed documents are also accessible via
the Internet at: https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/sfd/sfdmulti.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on this rule contact Michael
Ruccio, Fishery Policy Analyst, phone:
978–281–9104.
To obtain the FW 48, FW 50, or Sector
Operations Plans interim rules,
associated National Environmental
Policy Act EAs, FRFA Analyses, and
RIRs, visit NMFS Northeast Regional
Office’s Web site at: https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/sfd/sfdmulti.html,
or send a written request to: Sustainable
Fisheries Division, NMFS Northeast
Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
53363
NMFS associated with FW 48 (78 FR
26118; May 3, 2013), FW 50 (78 FR
26172; May 3, 2013), and Sector
Operations Plans (78 FR 25591; May 2,
2013). These rules contain substantial
background, explanation of the
measures, responses to public
comments received on the associated
proposed rules, and regulatory text that
is not repeated here. Public comment
was requested on several measures
within the interim rules. Specifically,
For FW 48:
• New status determination criteria for
white hake
• Monitoring/attribution system for
catches from the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area
For FW 50:
• Re-estimation of Southern New
England (SNE)/Mid-Atlantic (MA)
yellowtail flounder catch by scallop
vessels
• Unused Annual Catch Entitlement
(ACE) carryover accounting for
FY2014 and beyond.
For Sector Operations Plans:
• A revised explanation of how at-sea
monitoring coverage rates are derived
• Revisions to the exemptions from the
number of gillnets imposed on Day
gillnet vessels
This rule finalizes the interim
measures as previously published for all
but the interim Eastern U.S./Canada
Area catch monitoring/attribution. The
next section (section 2) briefly
summarizes the final measures for those
items that are unchanged from the
interim rules. Section 3 provides
information on the final Eastern U.S./
Canada Area catch monitoring/
attribution being implemented through
this rule. Section 4 describes minor
corrections to FW 48 and 50
implementing regulatory text being
made through this rule.
2. Measures Unchanged From the FW
48, FW 50, and Sector Operations Plans
Interim Rules
1. Background
NMFS published three separate
interim rules containing various
measures for the 2013 NE multispecies
fishing year that began May 1, 2013.
These rules implemented measures
developed by the New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) and
White Hake Status Determination
Criteria
The criteria outlined in the May 3,
2013, FW 48 interim rule are
implemented as final through this rule.
The criteria are outlined in Table 1. One
comment in support of the interim
measures was received.
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53336-53363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21054]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 121024581-3714-02]
RIN 0648-BC71
List of Fisheries for 2013
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2013, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The final LOF for 2013 reflects new
information on interactions between commercial fisheries and marine
mammals. NMFS must classify each commercial fishery
[[Page 53337]]
on the LOF into one of three categories under the MMPA based upon the
level of serious injury and mortality of marine mammals that occurs
incidental to each fishery. The classification of a fishery on the LOF
determines whether participants in that fishery are subject to certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as registration, observer coverage, and
take reduction plan (TRP) requirements. The fishery classifications and
list of marine mammal stocks incidentally injured or killed described
in the Final LOF for 2012 remain in effect until the effective date of
the Final LOF for 2013.
DATES: This final rule is effective September 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates, or any other
aspect of the collection of information requirements contained in this
rule, should be submitted in writing to Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea
Turtle Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or to Stuart Levenback,
OMB, by email to Stuart_Levenbach@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa White, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8494; Allison Rosner, Northeast Region, 978-281-
9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Elizabeth Petras,
Southwest Region, 562-980-3238; Brent Norberg, Northwest Region, 206-
526-6550; Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region, 907-586-7642; Nancy Young,
Pacific Islands Region, 808-944-2282. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the list of fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories based on the level of incidental
serious injury and mortality of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of a fishery on the
LOF determines whether participants in that fishery may be required to
comply with certain provisions of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction plan requirements. NMFS must
reexamine the LOF annually, considering new information in the Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SARs) and other relevant sources, and
publish in the Federal Register any necessary changes to the LOF after
notice and opportunity for public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery classification criteria can be
found in the implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50
CFR 229.2). The criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria consist of a two-tiered, stock-
specific approach that first addresses the total impact of all
fisheries on each marine mammal stock and then addresses the impact of
individual fisheries on each stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of animals per year, of
incidental mortalities and serious injuries of marine mammals due to
commercial fishing operations relative to the potential biological
removal (PBR) level for each marine mammal stock. The MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362(20)) defines the PBR level as the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum
sustainable population. This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: If the total annual mortality and serious injury of a
marine mammal stock, across all fisheries, is less than or equal to 10
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock would be placed in Category III (unless those fisheries
interact with other stock(s) in which total annual mortality and
serious injury is greater than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise, these
fisheries are subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of analysis to
determine their classification.
Tier 2, Category I: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than or equal to 50 percent of the PBR
level (i.e., frequent incidental mortality and serious injuries of
marine mammals).
Tier 2, Category II: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent
of the PBR level (i.e., occasional incidental mortality and serious
injuries of marine mammals).
Tier 2, Category III: Annual mortality and serious injury of a
stock in a given fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent of the PBR
level (i.e., a remote likelihood or no known incidental mortality and
serious injuries of marine mammals).
While Tier 1 considers the cumulative fishery mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock, Tier 2 considers fishery-specific
mortality and serious injury for a particular stock. Additional details
regarding how the categories were determined are provided in the
preamble to the final rule implementing section 118 of the MMPA (60 FR
45086, August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a per-stock basis, a fishery
may qualify as one Category for one marine mammal stock and another
Category for a different marine mammal stock. A fishery is typically
classified on the LOF at its highest level of classification (e.g., a
fishery qualifying for Category III for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal stock will be listed under
Category II).
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
There are several fisheries on the LOF classified as Category II
that have no recent documented injuries or mortalities of marine
mammals, or fisheries that did not result in a serious injury or
mortality rate greater than 1 percent of a stock's PBR level based on
known interactions. NMFS has classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use similar fishing techniques or
gear that are known to cause mortality or serious injury of marine
mammals, or according to factors discussed in the final LOF for 1996
(60 FR 67063, December 28, 1995) and listed in the regulatory
definition of a Category II fishery, ``In the absence of reliable
information indicating the frequency of incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals by a commercial fishery, NMFS will
determine whether the incidental serious injury or mortality is
``frequent,'' ``occasional,'' or ``remote'' by evaluating other factors
such as fishing techniques, gear used, methods used to deter marine
mammals, target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative data
from logbooks or fisher reports, stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the area, or at the discretion of the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries'' (50 CFR 229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries not specifically identified
on the LOF are deemed to be Category II fisheries until the next LOF is
published (50 CFR 229.2).
How does NMFS determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species or stocks
incidentally
[[Page 53338]]
killed or injured in each commercial fishery. To determine which
species or stocks are included as incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery, NMFS annually reviews the information presented in the current
SARs. The SARs are based upon the best available scientific information
and provide the most current and inclusive information on each stock's
PBR level and level of interaction with commercial fishing operations.
NMFS also reviews other sources of new information, including observer
data, stranding data, and fisher self-reports.
In the absence of reliable information on the level of mortality or
injury of a marine mammal stock, or insufficient observer data, NMFS
will determine whether a species or stock should be added to, or
deleted from, the list by considering other factors such as: Changes in
gear used, increases or decreases in fishing effort, increases or
decreases in the level of observer coverage, and/or changes in fishery
management that are expected to lead to decreases in interactions with
a given marine mammal stock (such as a TRP or a fishery management plan
(FMP)). In these instances, NMFS will provide case-specific
justification in the LOF for changes to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured.
How does NMFS determine the levels of observer coverage in a fishery on
the LOF?
Data obtained from the observer program and observer coverage
levels are important tools in estimating the level of marine mammal
mortality and serious injury in commercial fishing operations. The best
available information on the level of observer coverage and the spatial
and temporal distribution of observed marine mammal interactions is
presented in the SARs. Starting with the 2005 SARs, each SAR includes
an appendix with detailed descriptions of each Category I and II
fishery on the LOF, including observer coverage in those fisheries. The
SARs generally do not provide detailed information on observer coverage
in Category III fisheries because, under the MMPA, Category III
fisheries are not required to accommodate observers aboard vessels due
to the remote likelihood of mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals. Fishery information presented in the SARs' appendices may
include: Level of observer coverage, target species, levels of fishing
effort, spatial and temporal distribution of fishing effort,
characteristics of fishing gear and operations, management and
regulations, and interactions with marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources Web site at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/. Information on observer coverage
levels in Category I and II fisheries can also be found in the Category
I and II fishery fact sheets on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources
Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/. Additional
information on observer programs in commercial fisheries can be found
on the NMFS National Observer Program's Web site: https://www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/.
How do I find out if a specific fishery is in Category I, II, or III?
This rule includes three tables that list all U.S. commercial
fisheries by LOF Category. Table 1 lists all of the commercial
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists all of
the commercial fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S.-authorized commercial fisheries
on the high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists all commercial
fisheries managed under applicable TRPs or take reduction teams (TRT).
Are high seas fisheries included on the LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS includes high seas fisheries in
Table 3 of the LOF, along with the number of valid High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of 2004, NMFS issues
HSFCA permits only for high seas fisheries analyzed in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species
Act (ESA). The authorized high seas fisheries are broad in scope and
encompass multiple specific fisheries identified by gear type. For the
purposes of the LOF, the high seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to
provide more detail on composition of effort within these fisheries.
Many fisheries operate in both U.S. waters and on the high seas,
creating some overlap between the fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2
and those in Table 3. In these cases, the high seas component of the
fishery is not considered a separate fishery, but an extension of a
fishery operating within U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2). NMFS
designates those fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ``*'' after the
fishery's name. The number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the
high seas components of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters does
not necessarily represent additional effort that is not accounted for
in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels/participants holding HSFCA permits also
fish within U.S. waters and are included in the number of vessels and
participants operating within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for five years, during which time FMPs can
change. Therefore, some vessels/participants may possess valid HSFCA
permits without the ability to fish under the permit because it was
issued for a gear type that is no longer authorized under the most
current FMP. For this reason, the number of HSFCA permits displayed in
Table 3 is likely higher than the actual U.S. fishing effort on the
high seas. For more information on how NMFS classifies high seas
fisheries on the LOF, see the preamble text in the final 2009 LOF (73
FR 73032; December 1, 2008).
Where can I find specific information on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I and II fishery on the LOF.
These fishery fact sheets provide the full history of each Category I
and II fishery, including: When the fishery was added to the LOF, the
basis for the fishery's initial classification, classification changes
to the fishery, changes to the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the fishery, fishery gear and methods used,
observer coverage levels, fishery management and regulation, and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These fishery fact sheets are updated
after each final LOF and can be found under ``How Do I Find Out if a
Specific Fishery is in Category I, II, or III?'' on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources' Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/, linked to the ``List of Fisheries by Year'' table.
NMFS plans to develop similar fishery fact sheets for each Category III
fishery on the LOF. However, due to the large number of Category III
fisheries on the LOF and the lack of accessible and detailed
information on many of these fisheries, the development of these
fishery fact sheets will take significant time to complete. NMFS
anticipates posting Category III fishery fact sheets along with the
final 2015 LOF, although this timeline may be revised as this effort
progresses.
Am I required to register under the MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in a Category I or II fishery
are required under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)), as described in 50
CFR 229.4, to register with NMFS and obtain a marine mammal
authorization to lawfully take
[[Page 53339]]
non-endangered and non-threatened marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations. Owners of vessels or gear engaged in a
Category III fishery are not required to register with NMFS or obtain a
marine mammal authorization.
How do I register and receive my authorization certificate and injury/
mortality reporting forms?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal Authorization Program (MMAP), with existing
state and Federal fishery license, registration, or permit systems for
Category I and II fisheries on the LOF. Participants in these fisheries
are automatically registered under the MMAP and are not required to
submit registration or renewal materials directly under the MMAP. In
the Pacific Islands, Southwest, Northwest, and Alaska regions, NMFS
will issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate and/or
injury/mortality reporting forms via U.S. mail or with their state or
Federal license at the time of renewal. In the Northeast region, NMFS
will issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate via U.S.
mail automatically at the beginning of each calendar year, but vessel
or gear owners must request or print injury/mortality reporting forms
by contacting the NMFS Northeast Regional Office at 978-281-9328 or by
visiting the Northeast Regional Office Web site (https://www.nero.noaa.gov/mmap). In the Southeast region, NMFS will issue
vessel or gear owners notification of registry and vessel or gear
owners may receive their authorization certificate and/or injury/
mortality reporting form by contacting the Southeast Regional Office at
727-209-5952 or by visiting the Southeast Regional Office Web site
(https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/mm/mmap.htm) and following the
instructions for printing the necessary documents.
The authorization certificate, or a copy, must be on board the
vessel while it is operating in a Category I or II fishery, or for non-
vessel fisheries, in the possession of the person in charge of the
fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to limit
the issuance of authorization certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or II fisheries, not all state
and Federal permit systems distinguish between fisheries as classified
by the LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in Category III
fisheries may receive authorization certificates even though they are
not required for Category III fisheries. Individuals fishing in
Category I and II fisheries for which no state or Federal permit is
required must register with NMFS by contacting their appropriate
Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
How do I renew my registration under the MMAP?
In Southwest, Alaska, and Northeast regional fisheries,
registrations of vessel or gear owners are automatically renewed and
participants should receive an authorization certificate by January 1
of each new year. In Pacific Islands regional fisheries, vessel or gear
owners should receive an authorization certificate by January 1 for
state fisheries and with their permit renewal for federal fisheries. In
Northwest regional fisheries, vessel or gear owners receive
authorization with each renewed state fishing license, the timing of
which varies based on target species. Vessel or gear owners who
participate in these regions and have not received authorization
certificates by January 1 or with renewed fishing licenses must contact
the appropriate NMFS Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
In Southeast regional fisheries, vessel or gear owners'
registrations are automatically renewed and participants will receive a
letter in the mail by January 1 instructing them to contact the
Southeast Regional Office to have an authorization certificate mailed
to them or to visit the Southeast Regional Office Web site (https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/mm/mmap.htm) to print their own certificate.
Am I required to submit reports when I injure or kill a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6,
any vessel owner or operator, or gear owner or operator (in the case of
non-vessel fisheries), participating in a fishery listed on the LOF
must report to NMFS all incidental injuries and mortalities of marine
mammals that occur during commercial fishing operations, regardless of
the category in which the fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip. ``Injury'' is defined in 50 CFR
229.2 as a wound or other physical harm. In addition, any animal that
ingests fishing gear or any animal that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any part of the body is considered
injured, regardless of the presence of any wound or other evidence of
injury, and must be reported. Injury/mortality reporting forms and
instructions for submitting forms to NMFS can be downloaded from:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/interactions/mmap_reporting_form.pdf
or by contacting the appropriate Regional office (see ADDRESSES).
Reporting requirements and procedures can be found in 50 CFR 229.6.
Am I required to take an observer aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a Category I or II fishery are
required to accommodate an observer aboard their vessel(s) upon request
from NMFS. MMPA section 118 states that an observer will not be placed
on a vessel if the facilities for quartering an observer or performing
observer functions are inadequate or unsafe, therefore, vessels too
small to accommodate an observer are exempt from this requirement.
However, observer requirements will not be exempted, regardless of
vessel size, for U.S. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline vessels operating in special areas designated by the
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan implementing regulations (50 CFR
229.36(d)). Observer requirements can be found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I required to comply with any marine mammal take reduction plan
regulations?
Table 4 in this rule provides a list of fisheries affected by TRPs
and TRTs. TRP regulations can be found at 50 CFR 229.30 through 229.37.
A description of each TRT and copies of each TRP can be found at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/trt/. It is the responsibility
of fishery participants to comply with applicable take reduction
regulations.
Where can I find more information about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program, including registration procedures and forms, current and past
LOFs, information on each Category I and II fishery, observer
requirements, and marine mammal injury/mortality reporting forms and
submittal procedures, may be obtained at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/ lof/, or from any NMFS Regional Office at the addresses
listed below:
NMFS, Northeast Region, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930-2298, Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701, Attn: Jessica Powell;
[[Page 53340]]
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802-4213, Attn: Elizabeth Petras;
NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115,
Attn: Brent Norberg, Protected Resources Division;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Bridget Mansfield; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814, Attn: Nancy Young.
Sources of Information Reviewed for the Final 2013 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal incidental serious injury and
mortality information presented in the SARs for all fisheries to
determine whether changes in fishery classification were warranted. The
SARs are based on the best scientific information available at the time
of preparation, including the level of serious injury and mortality of
marine mammals that occurs incidental to commercial fishery operations
and the PBR levels of marine mammal stocks. The information contained
in the SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific Review Groups (SRGs)
representing Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean. The SRGs were created by the
MMPA to review the science that informs the SARs, and to advise NMFS on
marine mammal population status, trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of new information, including
marine mammal stranding data, observer program data, fisher self-
reports, reports to the SRGs, conference papers, FMPs, and ESA
documents.
The LOF for 2013 was based, among other things, on information
provided in the NEPA and ESA documents analyzing authorized high seas
fisheries; stranding data; fishermen self-reports through the MMAP; the
final SARs for 2006 (72 FR 12774, March 19, 2007), 2007 (73 FR 21111,
April 18, 2008), 2008 (74 FR 19530, April 29, 2009), 2009 (75 FR 12498,
March 16, 2010), 2010 (76 FR 34054, June 10, 2011), 2011 (77 FR 29969,
May 21, 2012); and 2012 (78 FR 19446, April 1, 2013, 78 FR 32377, May
30, 2013). The SARs are available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Fishery Descriptions
Beginning with the final 2008 LOF (72 FR 66048, November 27, 2007),
NMFS describes each Category I and II fishery in the LOF. In each LOF,
NMFS describes the fisheries classified as Category I or II that were
not classified as such on a previous LOF (and therefore have not yet
been described in the LOF). Descriptions of all Category I and II
fisheries operating in U.S. waters may be found in the SARs, FMPs, and
TRPs, through state agencies, or through the fishery summary documents
available on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources Web site (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/ lof/.) Additional details for
Category I and II fisheries operating on the high seas are included in
various FMPs, NEPA, or ESA documents.
The ``Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl''
fishery is reclassified from Category III to Category II. Rockfish
species fished include Pacific Ocean perch, northern rockfish, rougheye
rockfish, shortraker rockfish, and other rockfish. Fishing effort in
this fishery takes place in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone of the
Eastern Bering Sea and the portion of the North Pacific Ocean adjacent
to the Aleutian Islands, which is west of 170[deg]W longitude up to the
U.S.-Russian Convention Line of 1867. Pacific Ocean perch in the
Aleutian Islands is allocated under the Amendment 80 catch share
program to the trawl gear sectors. Northern rockfish, rougheye
rockfish, shortraker rockfish, and other rockfish do not have directed
fisheries but are caught incidentally in other fisheries. There are
currently an estimated 28 vessels licensed in this fishery.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 10 comment letters on the proposed LOF for 2013 (78
FR 23708, April 22, 2013). Comments were received from the Blue Water
Fishermen's Association, Bright Eye Fishing Company, Center for
Biological Diversity, Hawaii Longline Association, Marine Mammal
Commission, Oceana, Inc., Turtle Island Restoration Network, U.S.
Department of the Interior, Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management
Council, and one individual. Comments on issues outside the scope of
the LOF were noted, but generally without response.
General Comments
Comment 1: An individual commenter requests that NMFS explicitly
state what years of data are used in LOF analyses, specifically in the
vessels/persons and other tables where dates are not provided, to make
the information more clear and useful.
Response: In the preamble, NMFS states the years of the data used
in the LOF review. NMFS used the best available data for each stock. In
this rule for 2013, we used data from 2006-2010. The majority of data
used come from the SARs, which are updated annually. In the SARs, the
dates of the data used are stated. Other best available data sources
include: Observer data, stranding data, and fisher self-reports. In the
vessels/persons tables the most current federal and state commercial
fisheries data are used. References to specific data sources are
included in the proposed 2013 LOF rule (78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013)
``Summary of Changes to the LOF for 2013'' section.
Comment 2: The Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) recommends
that NMFS work in collaboration with the states to develop reliable
methods for estimating the number of participants in fisheries.
Response: As stated in the Final 2012 LOF (76 FR 73912, November
29, 2011), Table 2 represents a description of each fishery including
the estimated number of persons/vessels active in the fishery.
Currently, a clear measure of effort for all state fisheries has not
been determined due to the way some state permits allow for the use of
multiple gear types. As stated in the proposed 2013 LOF (78 FR 23708,
April 22, 2013), NMFS recognizes that there may be disparity between
permit holders listed and actual fishing effort; however, the numbers
provided on the LOF are solely used for descriptive purposes and will
not be used in determining future management of fisheries, observer
coverage designations, or bycatch rates, which are all done through
other processes that include public comment periods. Further, NMFS has
communicated with the states regarding the need for consistent fishing
effort data collection methods across states to better assess
fisheries' effects on marine mammal stocks that have interstate
distributions. NMFS will continue to communicate this need through TRT
processes, LOF yearly inquiries, and the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program's (MMAP's) integrated registration process and will work with
states to improve the accuracy of these estimated numbers of vessels/
persons.
Comment 3: The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) requests that
NMFS not reclassify fisheries to a lower category or remove marine
mammals from the list when information on the fishery and its
interactions is scant.
Response: As stated in the Final 2012 LOF (76 FR 73912, November
29, 2011), NMFS considers a broad range of information when proposing
or making fishery classification decisions on the LOF and does not
classify fisheries based solely on the presence or absence
[[Page 53341]]
of serious injuries or mortalities. Under the implementing regulations
for section 118, NMFS uses observer data, logbook data, stranding data,
fishers' reports, anecdotal reports, qualitative factors outlined in 50
CFR 229.2 (i.e., fishing techniques, gear used, methods used to deter
marine mammals, target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative
data from logbooks or fisher reports, stranding data, and the species
and distribution of marine mammals in the area), information on
incidental serious injury or mortality to marine mammals reported in
SARs (50 CFR 229.2; 60 FR 45086, August 30, 1995; 60 FR 67063, December
28, 1995), and input received during the public comment periods. NMFS
considers all of this information to determine whether the fishery can
be classified on the LOF based on quantitative information analyzed
through the Tier 1 and 2 analyses; or whether the fishery can be
classified on the LOF based on the qualitative information outlined in
NMFS regulations at 50 CFR 229.2.
Comment 4: The CBD recommends that NMFS be more transparent about
the statistical reliability of bycatch estimates. The CBD reiterated an
old Commission recommendation that NMFS include observer coverage for
each fishery on the List of Fisheries, including Category III
fisheries, to allow the reader to assess the adequacy of information on
incidental mortality and serious injury to marine mammals. CBD
recommends adding a column with observer coverage to the first table in
the proposed rule that lists each fishery and the estimated number of
participants.
Response: NMFS agrees with CBD's comment referencing the
Commission's comment from the Final 2012 LOF (76 FR 73916, November 29,
2011, comment/response 2), that summarizing the information used as the
basis to classify each fishery on the LOF in one location could be
useful for interested readers. NMFS has posted information on each
Category I and II fishery on the LOF on the NMFS Office of Protected
Resources Web site (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/),
where it can be considered at the readers' discretion. NMFS is
developing similar fishery fact sheets for each Category III fishery
and anticipates posting those fishery fact sheets along with the final
2015 LOF. However, due to the large number of Category III fisheries on
the LOF and the lack of accessible and detailed information on many of
these fisheries, this timeline may be revised as this effort
progresses.
Comment 5: The CBD opposes the inclusion of aquaculture operations
as Category III fisheries and recommends that they be managed under
MMPA Section 101(a)(5)(A) through (D) with take prohibitions and
permits.
Response: As stated in the Final 2012 LOF (76 FR 73912, November
29, 2011), NMFS works under Section 118 of the MMPA which governs the
``taking of marine mammals incidental to commercial fishing
operations.'' The MMPA does not provide a definition of a commercial
fishing operation; therefore, NMFS defined ``commercial fishing
operation'' in regulations at 50 CFR 229.2. The definition was
presented in the proposed and final rules implementing the regulations
for section 118 of the MMPA (60 FR 31666, June 16, 1995; 60 FR 65086,
August 30, 1995). As noted in those proposed and final rules, and in
the responses to comments on the 2009, 2010 and 2012 LOFs (73 FR 73032,
December 1, 2008, comment/response 5; 74 FR 58859, November 16, 2009,
comment/response 11; 76 FR 73916, November 29, 2011, comment/response
3), the definition of a ``commercial fishing operation'' includes
aquaculture. The regulations in 50 CFR 229.2 define a ``commercial
fishing operation'' as ``the catching, taking, or harvesting of fish
from the marine environment . . . . The term includes . . . aquaculture
activities.'' Further, ``fishing or to fish'' is defined as ``any
commercial fishing operation.'' Therefore, aquaculture fisheries are
considered commercial fisheries that are managed under section 118 of
the MMPA and are therefore included on the annual LOF.
Comment 6: The Commission recommends that NMFS include in the 2014
LOF the estimated fishing effort, number of participants, and sources
of the estimates (e.g., number of active participants, number of
licensed vessels/persons, number of vessels/persons in previous LOFs,
or other).
Response: Section 118 (c)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
states that the Secretary shall include ``the approximate number of
vessels or persons actively involved in, each such fishery.'' Each year
NMFS provides updates on the estimated fishery participants as
indicated in Table 2. NMFS provides a description of the sources of
this information in each proposed rule when changes to the LOF are
proposed. NMFS describes why these numbers may reflect potential
industry participation and not necessarily active permit holders.
Providing additional information on active participants, as requested
by the commenter, may be possible for federal and some state permit/
license holders. However, it is not currently available for many state
fisheries.
NMFS requests state permit holder data from state agencies through
the MMAP integrated registration process. At that time, NMFS provides
state officials with the MMPA Category I & Category II fishery
definitions. State representatives, being experts in their fisheries,
then assign their state fisheries to the most appropriate LOF fishery
when responding to NMFS's annual request for permit holder information.
In some cases, a permit holder may have the potential to use a
particular gear type, though they may not be actively participating.
NMFS has interpreted Table 2 to represent an estimation of ``potential
participation'' in a fishery, and each year provides specific language
that explains that these numbers represent estimates and not actual
effort for certain fisheries. NMFS will strive to include the requested
additional information of estimated fishing effort, number of
participants, and sources of estimates in the fishery fact sheets that
are available on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Comment 7: The Commission recommends that NMFS elevate the Hawaii
charter and Hawaii trolling, rod and reel fisheries to Category II and
initiate observer coverage to obtain data necessary to rigorously
assess the risk the fisheries pose to the Hawaii stock of pantropical
spotted dolphins. The Commission states that NMFS's conclusions
regarding total commercial fishery-related mortality and serious injury
of Hawaiian pantropical spotted dolphins are based on a series of
observations that are not sufficient to assess the takes from the
fisheries. The Commission also disagrees with NMFS's conclusion that,
``in the absence of evidence of mortality/serious injury . . . a
Category III classification . . . is appropriate,'' for it shifts the
burden of proof away from fishery management and removes the incentive
to collect data needed to characterize the level of take.
Response: NMFS is retaining the Hawaii charter and Hawaii trolling,
rod and reel fisheries as Category III fisheries. As described in the
proposed rule (78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013), NMFS does not have a
quantitative estimate of the number of mortalities and serious injuries
of pantropical spotted dolphins in the fisheries. In the absence of
that data, consistent with 50 CFR 229.2, NMFS considers other factors
to assess the risk to the dolphins, including fishing techniques, gear
used,
[[Page 53342]]
methods used to deter marine mammals, target species, seasons and areas
fished, qualitative data, stranding information, and other relevant
information on marine mammals. We have evaluated the available
information, which is summarized in the proposed rule, and determined
that incidental mortalities and serious injuries are likely rare,
rather than ``occasional''; and, thus, a Category III classification is
warranted.
NMFS has the authority to place observers on Category III vessels
under certain circumstances and to develop an alternative observer
program to collect data on commercial fishing operations via other
platforms (e.g., vessels, airplanes, points on shore) (50 CFR 229.7).
Although NMFS is not initiating observer coverage for the troll and
charter vessel fisheries at this time, we will continue to work with
the State of Hawaii and with independent researchers to collect and
evaluate information on the interaction between the fisheries and
dolphins.
Comment 8: The Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council
concurs with NMFS that the Hawaii charter and Hawaii trolling, rod and
reel fisheries should remain Category III.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment and is finalizing the
Hawaii charter and Hawaii trolling, rod and reel fisheries' proposed
Category III classification.
Comment 9: The CBD opposes the removal of humpback whales (Central
North Pacific stock) and Blainville's beaked whales (Hawaiian stock)
from the list of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in
Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery. The CBD provides three
reasons for retaining the species on the list. First, effort in the
fishery increased from 2010 to 2011, and interactions with marine
mammals will increase with the additional effort. As a result, NMFS
should not now remove these species. Second, 20% observer coverage
means there is a quantifiable risk that some interactions are
unobserved and unreported, especially for the endangered humpback
whale, NMFS should consider more than the most recent five years of
data before removing a species historically taken by the fishery.
Third, excluding marine mammals based solely on a lack of documented
injuries or deaths in the most recent 5-year period is inconsistent
with NMFS policy and prior practice. For example, NMFS just added
Blainville's beaked whales on the 2012 LOF as an acknowledgment of the
great uncertainty in identifying species and stocks taken in this
fishery outside the U.S. EEZ. Therefore, the removal from the list on
the basis of information for the most recent five-year period seems
contradictory to what NMFS decided in listing them.
Response: NMFS is removing the two stocks from the list of species
and stocks injured or killed in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery, as proposed. Responses to each of the CBD's three arguments
are set forth below.
First, although the number of fishing sets in the Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery has increased somewhat from 2010 to 2011 (Pacific
Islands Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Monitoring Branch, 2012),
this fact alone does not indicate that there was or will be an increase
in marine mammal interactions. The Hawaii deep-set fishery operates
under a limited entry system, with the number of vessels remaining
relatively constant over the past ten years. NMFS is removing these two
marine mammal species/stocks because they have not been observed to be
caught in the fishery in the most recent five years of data included in
this analysis (2006-2010). NMFS will continue to update the list in
future LOFs to reflect the best available data on observed
interactions.
Second, in fisheries where observer coverage is inadequate, NMFS
may retain species and stocks on the list for longer than five years,
on a case-by-case basis. In the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery, NMFS
is satisfied that existing observer coverage (20%) is sufficient to
detect even rare marine mammal bycatch events, particularly when data
are pooled across multiple years. Therefore, NMFS is relying on
observer data to inform the list of species injured or killed in the
fishery.
Third, NMFS considers these changes to the list of species injured
or killed to be consistent with our policy and prior practice. The
CBD's discussion of the addition of the Blainville's beaked whale to
the list contains factual errors that we clarify below. The Hawaiian
stock of Blainville's beaked whale has been included on the list of
species injured/killed in the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery since
the 2009 LOF (and in the Hawaii longline fishery on the 2006-2008 LOFs
before the Hawaii deep- and shallow-set longline fisheries were split).
The most recently observed interaction with a Blainville's beaked whale
in the deep-set fishery was a non-serious injury on the high seas in
2005. In the 2012 LOF, NMFS added an ``unknown'' stock of Blainville's
beaked whale to the high-seas component of the fishery (Table 3--
Western Pacific Pelagic (Hawaii Deep-set component)) to account for the
uncertainty in stock (not species) identification on the high seas
given that the full offshore ranges of Hawaiian pelagic cetacean stocks
are unknown. Accordingly, the addition of this ``unknown'' stock was
meant to account for the inherent uncertainty in identifying whether
the animals are from the Hawaiian pelagic stocks or from other high
seas stocks and not because of additional observed takes within the
time period considered for the 2012 LOF (2005-2009). More recent data
indicate there have been no observed interactions with Blainville's
beaked whales in the most recent 5-year period (2006-2010); and, thus,
the removal of the species (including both the Hawaiian and unknown
stocks) is appropriate.
Comment 10: The CBD continues to have concern over NMFS's lack of
assessment and analysis of fisheries' impacts on Hawaiian monk seals.
The CBD stated that, given the critically endangered status of the monk
seal, any interaction is significant and any fishing mortality would
qualify a fishery as Category I if NMFS calculated the potential
biological removal (PBR) level. Continuing to rely on the fact that the
PBR level for monk seals is ``undetermined'' to justify NMFS's failure
to make a quantitative evaluation of incidental mortality and serious
injury compared to PBR evades the intent and legal mandates of the
MMPA.
Response: NMFS expects that the great majority of fisheries'
interactions with Hawaiian monk seals occur in the main Hawaiian
Islands (MHI), where coastal and recreational fisheries primarily
operate. Currently, NMFS is only able to estimate the minimum number of
fisheries' interactions based on opportunistic reporting by the public.
Reports about interactions coming directly from fishermen are rare. A
majority of those reported interactions are hookings (serious injury).
However, notwithstanding these fisheries interactions, NMFS is
encouraged that the monk seal population in the MHI continues to
increase, with an estimated intrinsic population growth rate of 6.5%
per year (Baker et al., 2011).
NMFS is unable to reliably determine whether an interaction (i.e.,
hooking) occurred in a commercial or recreational fishery, primarily
for two reasons. First, when a seal is sighted with a hook, it is often
difficult to determine the fishery of origin, even if the hook or other
gear is recovered from the animal. Second, many Hawaiian fisheries have
both commercial and non-commercial components. As a result, even if the
fishery can be identified from the recovered gear, it may be difficult
to verify whether the interaction occurred during commercial fishing
(and would
[[Page 53343]]
thus be evaluated on the LOF). This issue will not be resolved without
improved information and reporting by fishermen.
NMFS continues to try to improve its data collection, analysis and
assessment of fisheries' interactions and their impacts on Hawaiian
monk seals. NMFS is currently working with state and private partners
to address some of these limitations in data and reporting. Some
examples include:
The NMFS Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center Hawaiian
Monk Seal Research Program (HMSRP) partners with the State of Hawaii to
better quantify and describe potential monk seal interactions with
fisheries in order to develop mitigation strategies.
The HMSRP is conducting a community-based research project
using National Geographic Crittercams to look at the seals' foraging
behavior and fisheries interactions. This project allows fishermen to
take part in the research and has a substantial community engagement
component educating the fishing community about seals and encouraging
reporting.
The NMFS Pacific Islands Regional Office develops outreach
products and messages to inform fishermen about best practices when
fishing around monk seals and how to report interactions.
Several Federal, State, and non-governmental organization
liaisons are working with various fishing communities to encourage
better reporting of monk seal interactions.
NMFS will continue to work with its state and federal partners and
the public to better understand, quantify, and reduce monk seal-fishery
interactions.
Comment 11: The Hawaii Longline Association (HLA) argues that the
Hawaii-based deep-set longline fishery does not interact with MHI
insular false killer whales and opposes including the stock on the list
of marine mammals injured or killed in the deep-set fishery.
Response: NMFS determines which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery by annually reviewing the
information presented in the current SARs, among other relevant
sources. The SARs are based on the best available scientific
information and provide the most current and inclusive information on
each stock, including range, abundance, PBR, and level of interaction
with commercial fishing operations. The LOF does not analyze or
evaluate the data and calculations contained within the SARs.
The 2012 SAR for false killer whales indicates that an average of
0.5 mortalities or serious injuries of MHI insular false killer whales
occur each year incidental to the Hawaii-based deep-set longline
fishery (Carretta et al., 2013). Therefore, NMFS is retaining the stock
on the list of marine mammal stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery. For a more complete analysis of
the methodology for determining mortality and serious injury of MHI
insular false killer whales, the commenter is referred to the 2012 SAR.
Comment 12: The HLA opposes NMFS's inclusion of a number of
``unknown'' marine mammals stocks on the list of species or stocks
injured or killed in the deep-set and shallow-set fisheries and states
it is in violation of the MMPA.
Response: The listings of ``unknown'' stocks are for species that
have been observed to have been taken by the Hawaii-based deep-set and
shallow-set longline fisheries on the high seas, but for which the
stock identity could not be reliably determined. NMFS' SARs for Hawaii
pelagic cetacean stocks note that the stocks' ranges extend into the
high seas, but the full offshore ranges are unknown. For those animals
taken by the longline fisheries on the high seas, NMFS is often unable
to determine whether the animals belong to the Hawaii pelagic stocks or
other high seas stocks. This is particularly true for takes that occur
far outside the U.S. EEZ around the Hawaiian Islands. Therefore, NMFS'
inclusion of ``unknown'' stocks that are known to interact with the
longline fisheries on the high seas is necessary to account for
uncertainty in stock identification.
Comment 13: The HLA opposes NMFS adding short-finned pilot whales
to the list of species injured or killed in the Hawaii shallow-set
longline fishery because it is not supported by the available data. The
addition is based on a single interaction on the high seas involving an
unidentified cetacean that ``may have'' been a short-finned pilot
whale. In the absence of data confirming that the fishery is
interacting with short-finned pilot whales, NMFS may not add the
species to the list of species or stocks that are incidentally killed
or injured by the fishery.
Response: One unidentified cetacean, known to be either a false
killer whale or short-finned pilot whale (i.e., a ``blackfish''), was
observed seriously injured in the shallow-set longline fishery on the
high seas in 2008. When the species of a blackfish cannot be positively
identified, NMFS prorates the interaction to one species or the other
based on distance from shore (McCracken, 2010). Proration of
unidentified blackfish takes accounts for uncertainty in the bycatch
estimates and until all animals taken can be identified to either
species (e.g., photos, tissue samples). This approach constitutes the
best available information and ensures that potential impacts to all
species and stocks are assessed. Based on this approach, the estimated
average annual mortality and serious injury of short-finned pilot
whales in the fishery is 0.1 (McCracken, 2011). Therefore, NMFS is
adding the short-finned pilot whale to the list of species or stocks
that are incidentally killed or injured by the fishery, as proposed.
Comment 14: The HLA concurs with NMFS's proposed removals from the
list of species and stocks that interact with the Hawaii-based longline
fisheries.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment and is finalizing the list
of species and stocks interacting with the Hawaii deep- and shallow-set
longline fisheries as proposed. As stated in the proposed rule (78 FR
23708, April 22, 2013), the changes reflect the most recent five years
of data (2006-2010) on observed marine mammal interactions in the
fisheries.
Comment 15: The Turtle Island Restoration Network (TIRN) recommends
that NMFS add pygmy killer whales to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery
based on one observed take in the first quarter of 2013.
Response: The 2013 LOF does not yet incorporate the recently
observed pygmy killer whale interaction. The observed interaction has
not yet been included in any bycatch estimate, and has not yet been
evaluated as part of the tier analysis for this fishery. This observed
take will be evaluated in a future LOF.
Comment 16: The Commission concurs with NMFS's proposed
reclassifications of the Bering Sea Aleutian Islands (BSAI) rockfish
trawl fishery from Category III to Category II, the BSAI Pacific cod
longline fishery from Category II to Category III, and the Alaska
Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery from Category II to Category III.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment and is finalizing the
fishery reclassifications.
Comment 17: The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) concurs with
NMFS that the Southwestern Alaska stock of northern sea otter is
incidentally taken in the AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet fishery, the
South Central Alaska stock of northern sea otter is incidentally taken
in the Alaska Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery, and
the Pacific walrus is incidentally taken in the Alaska BSAI flatfish
trawl fishery.
[[Page 53344]]
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment and is finalizing the
changes to the list of species injury or killed in these fisheries as
proposed.
Comment 18: NMFS received four comment letters supporting the
reclassification of the CA thresher shark and swordfish drift gillnet
fishery. All of the commenters concurred with the proposed elevation to
Category I, the addition of the CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whales to the
list of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in this
fishery, and that interactions with this stock provide the basis for
the elevation in classification.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment and is finalizing the CA
thresher shark and swordfish drift gillnet fishery reclassification
from Category II to Category I.
Comment 19: NMFS received three comment letters about species
injured and killed in the CA swordfish and thresher shark drift gillnet
fishery. All commenters requested that NMFS add minke whales to the
list of species incidentally killed or injured in the CA swordfish and
thresher shark drift gillnet fishery. One letter suggested that NMFS
consider whether these takes exceeded PBR.
Response: In the proposed 2013 LOF (78 FR 23708, April 22, 2013),
NMFS relied on information available through 2010. When the proposed
2013 LOF was drafted, the best available information on the fisheries
and marine mammal interactions was through 2010. The available
information included assessments of observed interactions and serious
injuries as well as extrapolations of the observed interactions of
commercial fisheries and marine mammals (Carretta and Enriquez, 2012).
A minke whale interaction was observed in the CA swordfish and thresher
shark drift gillnet fishery in 2011 (Carretta and Enriquez, 2012). This
information, as well as other fishery activities through 2011, will be
reviewed and included in the 2014 LOF, as appropriate.
Comment 20: DOI concurs with NMFS that the CA (southern) sea otters
be listed as incidentally taken in the CA halibut/white seabass and
other species set gillnet fishery. The DOI recommends that NMFS add CA
sea otters to CA coonstripe, shrimp, rock crab, tanner crab pot or trap
and CA spiny lobster fisheries lists.
Response: NMFS received a similar comment for the proposed 2012 LOF
(76 FR 73912, November 29, 2011, comment/response 9) as well as 2011
LOF (75 FR 68475, November 8, 2010) and 2010 LOF (74 FR 58859, November
16, 2009). As described in the response to comments in the final 2012
LOF (76 FR 73912, November 29, 2011) and described in detail in the
proposed 2009 LOF (73 FR 33760, June 13, 2008), NMFS conducted an
extensive review of all available information on marine mammal
interactions with pot/traps gear in 2008. Also in 2008, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) completed a stock assessment for southern
sea otters. As described in the 2008 SAR and 2009 LOF, there have been
four sea otters that are known to have died in pot/trap gear in
California and all occurred in 1987 and 1991. The U.S. Geological
Survey and California Department of Fish and Game (now California
Department of Fish and Wildlife) collaborated on observing finfish
traps in California, but did not record any sea otter interactions
(Carretta et al., 2009). The USFWS, as part of public comments for the
2012 LOF, submitted a paper by Hatfield et al. (2011), detailing
experiments that indicate that sea otters can enter and become
entrapped in pots or traps with openings of certain sizes. However, the
paper presented no evidence of this occurring during commercial fishing
activities off California. The possibility of an interaction is
insufficient justification to include southern sea otters on the list
of species incidentally injured or killed in the CA coonstripe shrimp,
rock crab, tanner crab pot or trap or the CA spiny lobster trap
fisheries. Instead, NMFS needs some indication that injuries or
mortalities are occurring or have occurred in these fisheries in recent
years (e.g., fisher self-reports, observer data, stranding data). If
additional information becomes available to indicate that southern sea
otters have been injured or killed in CA trap/pot fisheries in recent
years, NMFS will consider including this species on the LOF at that
time.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean
Comment 21: The Blue Water Fishermen's Association recommends that
NMFS divide the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline fishery for swordfish, tuna, and sharks into three
regional fisheries. The Atlantic and Caribbean should be divided at the
Georgia/Florida state line into north and south Atlantic regions and
the Gulf of Mexico should be a third region.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf
of Mexico large pelagics longline fishery should be divided into three
regions. Gear used throughout the large pelagics longline fishery is
relatively the same, and marine mammal stocks have the potential to
interact with this gear across all geographic regions. For example,
other Southeast fisheries including the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot fishery; the Atlantic mixed species
trap/pot fishery; the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic Gulf of Mexico shrimp
trawl fishery; and the Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery are all grouped
together based on similar gear types, despite slight regional
differences in fishing techniques or the marine mammal stocks affected.
Furthermore, even though the pelagics longline fishery is grouped over
geographic regions for LOF purposes, management measures to reduce
serious injuries and mortalities of marine mammals for the fishery are
already focused on geographic areas where interactions pose a
significant risk to specific marine mammal stocks, rather than
implementing broad-brush regulations that span over large areas with
different variations of interactions.
Comment 22: The Blue Water Fishermen's Association recommends that
NMFS support research efforts to better understand depredation by
marine mammals on hooked catches, specifically pilot whale
interactions.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Blue Water Fishermen's Association
that research efforts are important to reduce marine mammal
interactions. The LOF does not include any funding mechanisms to
support research efforts. However, we are supporting research efforts
to better understand how to reduce or prevent serious injuries and
mortalities of marine mammals in the Atlantic portion of the pelagic
longline fishery. Specifically, we are providing funding through North
Carolina Sea Grant for cooperative research between scientists and
fishermen to better understand pilot whale interactions with the
pelagic longline fishery as described in the Pelagic Longline Take
Reduction Plan. In addition, we are supporting two research projects in
2013 to evaluate the potential of weak hooks for reducing serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals, while maintaining catch for
fishermen.
Comment 23: DOI recommends that NMFS delete the superscript
reference about the level of interaction with the Atlantic blue crab
trap/pot fishery for the Florida subspecies of the West Indian manatee
because it is erroneous. The reference reads, ``[F]ishery classified
based on serious injuries and mortalities of this stock, which are
greater than 50 percent (Category 1) or greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock' s [potential biological
removal] PBR.''
[[Page 53345]]
Response: NMFS believes that the footnote regarding the level of
interaction between the Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery and the
Florida subspecies of West Indian manatee is relevant. This reference
is included for any stock listed under a fishery that has data showing
that serious injuries and mortalities are greater than 1 percent and
less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock's PBR. In NMFS
preliminary data, the PBR for the West Indian manatee was 14.98, and
three serious injuries were reported in Atlantic blue crab pot gear,
20% of the stock's PBR. Based on this information, NMFS finds the
footnote to be accurate and will maintain the footnote reference for
the Florida subspecies of manatee.
Comment 24: DOI recommends that NMFS remove the Florida subspecies
of the West Indian manatee from the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
shrimp trawl fishery. DOI is unaware of any manatees taken in this
fishery since 1990.
Response: Notwithstanding the record of historic takes and low
observer coverage since 1992 (less than 1%), NMFS will remove the
Florida subspecies of the West Indian manatee from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery since there have been no
recently documented takes. Further, the Georgia Department of Natural
Resources and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission closely
monitor the manatee population, which allows them to detect the
majority of dead and injured animals. The last known takes of manatees
by trawl gear were in 1997, as presented in the 2009 SAR (74 FR 69136,
December 30, 2009). Two takes were reported that year from Georgia
waters. One of the takes was lethal; the other was non-lethal. Also, in
1990, the inshore bait shrimp fishery was suggested to cause three
unconfirmed manatee mortalities. The manatee carcass salvage and
recovery program at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission coordinates carcass salvage to determine the cause of death
of every reported dead manatee (up to 400 manatees a year) (Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 2007). In Georgia, the
Department of Natural Resources works closely with the state of Florida
and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to monitor impacts to manatees.
Comment 25: The Commission recommends that NMFS elevate the
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial passenger fishing vessel
fishery and all other fisheries that could be responsible for observed
takes of bottlenose dolphins from Category III to Category II until
NMFS can reliably attribute the takes to a specific fishery(s).
Response: NMFS is currently reviewing all Category III fisheries
and associated data. Given the large number of Category III fisheries
and the lack of accessible and detailed information on many of these
fisheries, including the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial
passenger fishing vessel fishery, NMFS anticipates this review will
take some time. As noted in the preamble, fishery fact sheets for all
Category III fisheries are expected to be completed with the LOF for
2015, although this timeline may be revised as this effort progresses.
Comment 26: The Commission recommends that NMFS keep the eastern
Gulf of Mexico coastal bottlenose dolphin stock on the lists of species
or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Gulf of Mexico gillnet
fishery and the Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine fishery until five
years of adequate observer coverage data show otherwise.
Response: The eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal bottlenose dolphin
stock was removed from the Gulf of Mexico gillnet fishery because there
is little to no overlap with this fishery. The range of the eastern
Gulf of Mexico coastal bottlenose dolphin stock extends off the coast
of Florida to the 20 m isobath. Gillnets are prohibited in Florida
state waters. In Federal waters on the Gulf side, there are no gillnet
fisheries with the exception of a small fishery for king mackerel north
of the Marquesas' in the Florida Keys that fishes an average of 5-7
days per year. Because the spatial and temporal overlap of this stock
with this fishery is minimal and there are no recorded takes, NMFS
removed the Gulf of Mexico coastal bottlenose dolphin stock from this
fishery.
NMFS also removed the eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal bottlenose
dolphin stock from the Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine fishery
because there is now minimal overlap between the fishery and the
stock's range. Historically, the bait fishery for menhaden occurred
along the Florida panhandle and around Tampa Bay, but the fishery was
curtailed after the Florida net-ban of 1995 (Gulf States Marine
Fisheries Commission, 2010). There is now only a very small fishery for
menhaden off the Florida panhandle in Federal waters. No has been
documented from that fishery.
Comment 27: The Commission recommends that NMFS keep the Gulf of
Mexico oceanic Gervais beaked whale stock on the lists of species or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in Atlantic, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline fishery until five years of adequate
observer coverage data show otherwise.
Response: NMFS will keep the Gulf of Mexico oceanic Gervais beaked
whale stock on the list of species incidentally killed or injured by
the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline
fishery, because there has not been adequate observer coverage data
that show otherwise in the five year (2006-2010) data period used in
the LOF for 2013 analysis.
Comment 28: The Commission recommends that NMFS keep the northern
Gulf of Mexico continental shelf bottlenose dolphin stock on the lists
of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in Atlantic,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline fishery until five
years of adequate observer coverage data show otherwise.
Response: The Gulf of Mexico continental shelf bottlenose dolphin
stock was removed from the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline fishery because there has been adequate
observer coverage without any observed takes in the last five years.
The Gulf of Mexico portion of the pelagic longline fishery has adequate
observer coverage. For example, in 2011, the average observer coverage
of total longline sets in the Gulf of Mexico was 17.6% (Garrison and
Stokes, 2012). The last reported take potentially from this stock was
in 2007. This dolphin was released alive and presumed to have no
serious injuries. This animal could have belonged to the continental
shelf or oceanic stock.
Comment 29: The Association, Turtle Island Restoration Network, and
Bright Eye Fish Company request that NMFS re-evaluate or provide
further explanation of the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, and Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline fishery increase of estimated number of
vessels/persons from 94 to 420.
Response: NMFS re-evaluated the compiled permit data to ensure all
duplicated values were removed. The corrected estimated number of
vessels/persons is 234, based on 2012 permit data for all Atlantic tuna
longline and incidental and directed swordfish. The value of 234
represents all unique vessels that have one of these permits. Active
vessels in a given year may be less than 234, but we list all permitted
vessels that have the potential to fish in a given year within the
designated pelagic longline fishery.
[[Page 53346]]
Comments on Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Comment 30: The Turtle Island Restoration Network requests an
explanation of why prohibited fishing gears, such as gillnets on the
high seas, are listed as active fisheries.
Response: As stated in the preamble supplementary information under
header ``Are high seas fisheries included on the LOF?'' HSFCA permits
are valid for five years, during which time FMPs can change. Therefore,
some vessels/participants may possess valid HSFCA permits without the
ability to fish under the permit because it was issued for a gear type
that is no longer authorized under the most current FMP. For this
reason, the number of HSFCA permits displayed in Table 3 is likely
higher than the actual U.S. fishing effort on the high seas.
Gillnets are an authorized gear type in the List of Authorized
Fisheries and Gear in the MSA Provisions (50 CFR 600.725). On the U.S.
West Coast, the thresher shark and swordfish fishery is authorized to
use drift gillnets. Under the FMP for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for
Highly Migratory Species, drift gillnet use is banned during certain
seasons in specific portions of the EEZ off of California and Oregon.
An HSFCA permit is generally associated with at least one fishery that
is authorized by a Fishery Management Plan. As such gill netters are
still listed as a vessel type in the HSFCA permit application.
Comment 31: The Association states that the high seas fishing
vessel permit holders are already included in the Atlantic, Caribbean,
Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline vessels/persons count, so they
have been double-counted in the NMFS estimate of vessels/permits.
Response: As stated in the preamble supplementary information under
header ``Are high seas fisheries included on the LOF,'' many fisheries
operate in both U.S. waters and on the high seas, creating some overlap
between the fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and those in Table 3. In
these cases, the high seas component of the fishery is not considered a
separate fishery, but an extension of a fishery operating within U.S.
waters (listed in Table 1 or 2). NMFS designates those fisheries in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ``*'' after the fishery's name. The number of
HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the high seas components of these
fisheries operating in U.S. waters does not necessarily represent
additional effort that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and 2. Many
vessels/participants holding HSFCA permits also fish within U.S. waters
and are included in the number of vessels and participants operating
within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
Summary of Changes From the Proposed Rule
In this final rule, NMFS updated the ``Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean,
Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline'' fishery vessels/persons value.
The revised, final estimate is 243, down from 420 in the proposed rule.
In this final rule, NMFS added Gervais beaked whales (Gulf of
Mexico oceanic) to the list of species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the ``Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline'' fishery.
In this final rule, NMFS removed West Indian manatee (Florida) from
the list of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
``Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trawl'' fishery.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for 2013
The following summarizes changes to the LOF for 2013 in fishery
classification, the estimated number of vessels/participants in a
particular fishery, the species or stocks that are incidentally killed
or injured in a particular fishery, and the fisheries that are subject
to a take reduction plan. The classifications and definitions of U.S.
commercial fisheries for 2013 are identical to those provided in the
LOF for 2012 with the changes discussed below. State and regional
abbreviations used in the following paragraphs include: AK (Alaska), CA
(California), DE (Delaware), FL (Florida), GMX (Gulf of Mexico), HI
(Hawaii), MA (Massachusetts), ME (Maine), NC (North Carolina), NY (New
York), OR (Oregon), RI (Rhode Island), SC (South Carolina), VA
(Virginia), WA (Washington), and WNA (Western North Atlantic).
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Fishery Classification
NMFS reclassifies the ``CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet''
fishery from Category II to Category I.
NMFS reclassifies the ``Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Rockfish trawl'' fishery from Category III to Category II.
NMFS reclassifies the ``Alaska Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Pacific
cod longline'' fishery from Category II to Category III.
NMFS reclassifies the ``Alaska Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery''
from Category II to Category III.
NMFS determined that the ``Hawaii charter vessel'' and ``Hawaii
trolling, rod and reel'' fisheries should remain classified as Category
III fisheries.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of persons/vessels operating in
the Pacific Ocean as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated number Estimated number
Category Fishery of participants of participants
(Final 2012 LOF) (Final 2013 LOF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I............................... HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/set 124 129
line.
I............................... CA thresher shark/swordfish drift 45 25
gillnet.
II.............................. AK Bristol Bay Salmon drift gillnet... 1862 1863
II.............................. AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet..... 983 982
II.............................. AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet.... 571 569
II.............................. AK Kodiak salmon purse seine.......... 370 379
II.............................. AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon 115 114
set gillnet.
II.............................. AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet......... 166 167
II.............................. HI shallow-set (swordfish target) 28 20
longline/set line.
II.............................. American Samoa longline............... 26 24
II.............................. HI shortline.......................... 13 11
II.............................. AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet..... 476 474
III............................. AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 54 154
Pacific cod longline.
III............................. AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 29 36
Greenland Turbot longline.
III............................. AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, 824 1702
Kotzebue salmon gillnet.
III............................. AK roe herring and food/bait herring 986 990
gillnet.
III............................. AK roe herring and food/bait purse 361 367
seine.
III............................. AK salmon purse seine (excluding 936 935
salmon purse seine fisheries listed
as Category II).
III............................. AK salmon troll....................... 2045 2008
III............................. AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline 440 107
[[Page 53347]]
III............................. AK halibut longline/set line (State 2521 2280
and Federal waters).
III............................. AK State-managed waters longline/ 1448 1323
setline (including sablefish,
rockfish, lingcod, and miscellaneous
finfish).
III............................. AK miscellaneous finfish otter/beam 317 282
trawl.
III............................. AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl 32 33
(statewide and Cook Inlet).
III............................. AK statewide miscellaneous finfish pot 293 243
III............................. AK BSAI crab pot...................... 297 296
III............................. AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot............ 300 389
III............................. AK southeast Alaska crab pot.......... 433 415
III............................. AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot........ 283 274
III............................. AK shrimp pot, except southeast....... 15 210
III............................. AK Octopus/squid pot.................. 27 26
III............................. AK miscellaneous finfish handline/hand 445 456
troll and mechanical jig.
III............................. AK North Pacific halibut handline/hand 228 180
troll and mechanical jig.
III............................. AK herring spawn on kelp pound net.... 415 411
III............................. AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait 6 4
pound net.
III............................. AK urchin and other fish/shellfish.... 570 521
III............................. AK North Pacific halibut, AK bottom 1,302 (102 AK) 1,320 (120 AK)
fish, WA/OR/CA albacore, groundfish,
bottom fish, CA halibut non-salmonid
troll fisheries.
III............................. HI inshore gillnet.................... 44 36
III............................. HI opelu/akule net.................... 16 22
III............................. HI inshore purse seine................ 5 <3
III............................. HI throw net, cast net................ 22 29
III............................. HI hukilau net........................ 27 26
III............................. HI lobster tangle net................. 1 0
III............................. American Samoa tuna troll............. <50 7
III............................. HI trolling, rod and reel............. 2,191 1,560
III............................. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 88 40
Islands tuna troll.
III............................. Guam tuna troll....................... 401 432
III............................. HI kaka line.......................... 24 17
III............................. HI vertical longline.................. 10 9
III............................. HI crab trap.......................... 5 9
III............................. HI fish trap.......................... 13 9
III............................. HI lobster trap....................... 1 <3
III............................. HI shrimp trap........................ 2 4
III............................. HI crab net........................... 5 6
III............................. HI Kona crab loop net................. 46 48
III............................. American Samoa bottomfish............. <50 12
III............................. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana <50 28
Islands bottomfish.
III............................. Guam bottomfish....................... 200 >300
III............................. HI aku boat, pole, and line........... 2 3
III............................. HI Main Hawaiian Islands deep-sea 569 567
bottomfish handline.
III............................. HI inshore handline................... 416 378
III............................. HI tuna handline...................... 445 459
III............................. Western Pacific squid jig............. 6 1
III............................. HI bullpen trap....................... 4 <3
III............................. HI black coral diving................. 1 <3
III............................. HI handpick........................... 61 57
III............................. HI lobster diving..................... 39 29
III............................. HI spearfishing....................... 144 143
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Species or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the Pacific
Ocean
NMFS adds sperm whales (CA/OR/WA stock) and bottlenose dolphins
(CA/OR/WA offshore stock) to the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I ``CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet'' fishery. NMFS, further, adds a superscript ``1'' after sperm
whale (CA/OR/WA stock), indicating that this stock is a driver for the
Category I classification of this fishery. NMFS, also, removes the
superscript ``\1\'' from the humpback whale (CA/OR/WA stock).
NMFS adds bottlenose dolphins (CA/OR/WA offshore stock) to the list
of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III
``WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line'' fishery.
NMFS makes several changes to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II ``HI shallow-set
(swordfish target) longline'' fishery. NMFS adds short-finned pilot
whales (Hawaiian stock), removes Bryde's whales (Hawaiian stock), and
adds a superscript ``\1\'' following false killer whale (Hawaii pelagic
stock), to indicate the stock is driving the fishery's Category II
classification. NMFS removes the superscript ``\1\'' following
bottlenose dolphin (Hawaii pelagic stock), to indicate the stock is no
longer driving the fishery's Category II classification.
NMFS removes humpback whales (Central North Pacific stock) and
Blainville's beaked whales (Hawaiian stock) from the list of species or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I ``Hawaii deep-
set (tuna target) longline'' fishery.
NMFS adds pantropical spotted dolphins (Hawaii stock) to the list
of species or stocks incidentally injured or killed in the Category III
``Hawaii trolling, rod and reel'' and ``Hawaii charter vessel''
fisheries.
NMFS makes several changes to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II ``Alaska Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Flatfish trawl'' fishery. NMFS adds gray whales
(Eastern North Pacific stock), humpback whales (Western North Pacific
stock), killer whales (Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian Islands, and Bering Sea
transient stock), and ringed seals (Alaska stock).
NMFS makes several changes to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II
[[Page 53348]]
``Alaska Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Pollock trawl'' fishery. NMFS
adds ringed seals (Alaska stock), bearded seals (Alaska stock), and
Northern fur seals (Eastern Pacific stock). NMFS removes killer whales
(Eastern North Pacific, Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian Islands, and Bering
Sea transient stock) and minke whales (Alaska stock).
NMFS makes several changes to the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed by the Category III ``Alaska Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Pacific Cod longline'' fishery. NMFS adds Northern
fur seals (eastern Pacific stock) and Dall's Porpoise (Alaska stock),
and removes Steller sea lions (Western United States stock), ribbon
seals (Alaska stock), and killer whales (Alaska Resident stock).
NMFS adds Steller sea lions (Western United States stock) to the
list of species or stocks incidentally injured or killed by the
Category III ``Gulf of Alaska Pacific Cod longline'' fishery.
NMFS removes Steller sea lions (Eastern United States stock) from
the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or killed by the
Category III ``Gulf of Alaska Sablefish longline'' fishery.
NMFS removes Steller sea lions (Eastern United States stock) from
the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or killed by the
Category III ``Alaska Halibut longline'' fishery.
NMFS adds ribbon seal (Alaska stock) to the list of species or
stocks incidentally injured or killed by the Category III ``Atka
Mackerel trawl'' fishery.
NMFS removes harbor seals (Bering Sea stock) from the list of
species or stocks incidentally injured or killed by the Category III
``Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Pacific Cod trawl'' fishery.
NMFS removes humpback whales (Western North Pacific stock) and
(Central North Pacific stock) from the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed by the Category III ``Alaska Bering Sea
sablefish pot'' fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in commercial
fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated number Estimated number
Category Fishery of participants of participants
(Final 2012 LOF) (Final 2013 LOF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I............................... Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of 94 420
Mexico large pelagic longline.
I............................... Northeast Sink Gillnet................ 3,828 4,375
I............................... Mid Atlantic Gillnet.................. 6,402 5,509
I............................... Northeast/Mid Atlantic American 11,767 11,693
Lobster Trap/Pot.
II.............................. North Carolina inshore gillnet........ 2,250 1,323
II.............................. Southeast Atlantic gillnet............ 779 357
II.............................. Atlantic blue crab trap/pot........... 10,008 8,557
II.............................. Northeast Anchored Float Gillnet...... 414 421
II.............................. Northeast Mid Water Trawl (including 887 1,103
pair trawl).
II.............................. Mid Atlantic Mid Water Trawl 669 322
(including pair trawl and flynet).
II.............................. Mid Atlantic Beach Haul Seine......... 874 565
II.............................. Northeast Bottom Trawl................ 2,584 2,987
II.............................. Virginia Pound Net.................... 231 67
II.............................. Northeast Drift Gillnet............... 414 311
II.............................. Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot....... 3,526 3,467
II.............................. Mid Atlantic Bottom Trawl............. 1,388 631
II.............................. Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet........ 3,328 1,126
II.............................. Mid Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine..... 56 5
III............................. Atlantic Shellfish Bottom Trawl....... >86 >58
III............................. Gulf of Maine Atlantic Herring Purse >6 >7
Seine.
III............................. Northeast, Mid-Atlantic Bottom >1,281 >1,207
Longline/Hook & Line.
III............................. Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic Sea >230 >403
Scallop Dredge.
III............................. Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic Unknown >1
mackerel stop seine/weir.
III............................. Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, >403 428
shark swordfish hook-and-line/harpoon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Species or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured
NMFS removes bottlenose dolphin (Northern Gulf of Mexico
continental shelf stock) from the list of species or stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the Category I ``Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline'' fishery.
NMFS removes bottlenose dolphin (Eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal
stock) from the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or
killed in the Category II ``Gulf of Mexico gillnet'' fishery.
NMFS removes Atlantic spotted dolphins (Western North Atlantic
stock) from the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or
killed in the Category II ``Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet''
fishery.
NMFS removes bottlenose dolphins (Eastern Gulf of Mexico coastal
stock) from the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or
killed in the Category II ``Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine''
fishery.
NMFS removes dwarf sperm whales (Western North Atlantic stock) from
the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or killed in the
Category III ``Caribbean gillnet'' fishery.
NMFS adds bottlenose dolphin (Southern South Carolina/Georgia
coastal stock) to the list of species or stocks incidentally injured or
killed in the Category III ``Georgia cannonball jellyfish trawl''
fishery.
NMFS adds minke whales (Canadian East Coast stock) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II
``Northeast bottom trawl'' fishery.
NMFS adds Risso's dolphins (Western North Atlantic stock) to the
list of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I ``Mid-Atlantic gillnet'' fishery.
NMFS adds long-finned pilot whales (Western North Atlantic stock)
and short-finned pilot whales (Western North Atlantic stock) to the
list of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I ``Northeast sink gillnet'' fishery.
NMFS adds common dolphins (Western North Atlantic stock) and gray
[[Page 53349]]
seals (Western North Atlantic stock) to the list of species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II ``Northeast mid-water
trawl'' fishery.
NMFS adds gray seals (Western North Atlantic stock) to the list of
species stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II ``Mid-
Atlantic bottom trawl'' fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of HSFCA permits in multiple high
seas fisheries for multiple gear types (Table 3). The updated numbers
of HSFCA permits reflect the current number of permits in the NMFS
National Permit System database.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of HSFCA Number of HSFCA
Category High Seas Fishery permits (Final permits (Final
2012 LOF) 2013 LOF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I............................... Atlantic Highly Migratory Species 81 79
Longline.
II.............................. Atlantic HMS Drift Gillnet............ 1 2
II.............................. Pacific HMS Drift Gillnet............. 3 4
II.............................. Atlantic HMS Trawl.................... 3 5
II.............................. Western Pacific Pelagic Trawl......... 1 0
II.............................. South Pacific Tuna Purse Seine........ 33 38
II.............................. South Pacific Tuna Longline........... 11 10
II.............................. Pacific HMS Handline/Pole and Line.... 30 40
II.............................. South Pacific Albacore Handline/Pole 8 7
and Line.
II.............................. Western Pacific Pelagic Handline/Pole 8 6
and Line.
II.............................. Atlantic HMS Troll.................... 7 5
II.............................. South Pacific Albacore Troll.......... 51 36
II.............................. Western Pacific Pelagic Troll......... 32 22
III............................. Pacific HMS Longline.................. 84 96
III............................. Pacific HMS Purse Seine............... 7 6
III............................. Pacific HMS Troll..................... 258 263
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Species or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in High Seas
Fisheries (Table 3)
NMFS removes humpback whales (Central North Pacific stock) and
Blainville's beaked whales (Hawaiian and unknown stocks) from the list
of species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the ``Western
Pacific Pelagic (HI Deep-set component)'' fishery.
NMFS removes Bryde's whales (Hawaiian and unknown stocks) and adds
short-finned pilot whales (Hawaiian and unknown stocks) to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the ``Western
Pacific Pelagic (HI Shallow-set component)'' fishery.
Fisheries Affected by Take Reduction Teams and Plans
NMFS updates the list of fisheries affected by take reduction teams
and plans found in Table 4 of the LOF.
In the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean region, two updates
are made: The Atlantic portion of the ``Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery'' is subject to the Bottlenose
Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP), and the ``Chesapeake Bay inshore
gillnet fishery'' is also subject to the BDTRP.
In the Pacific Ocean region, NMFS adds ``False Killer Whale Take
Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)--50 CFR 229.37'' to the list of take reduction
plans. Affected fisheries include the Category I ``Hawaii deep-set
(tuna target) longline/set line'' and Category II ``Hawaii shallow-set
(swordfish target) longline/set line'' fisheries.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list of U.S. commercial
fisheries according to their classification under section 118 of the
MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
(including Alaska); Table 2 lists commercial fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean; Table 3 lists commercial
fisheries on the high seas; and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated number of vessels/persons
participating in fisheries operating within U.S. waters is expressed in
terms of the number of active participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a particular fishery is provided, which
represents a measure of potential effort. If no recent information is
available on the number of participants, vessels, or persons licensed
in a fishery, then the number from the most recent LOF is used for the
estimated number of vessels/persons in the fishery. NMFS acknowledges
that, in some cases, these estimations may be inflations of actual
effort, such as for many of the Mid-Atlantic and New England fisheries.
However, in these cases, the numbers represent the potential effort for
each fishery, given the multiple gear types several state permits may
allow for. Changes made to Mid-Atlantic and New England fishery
participants will not affect observer coverage or bycatch estimates as
observer coverage and bycatch estimates are based on vessel trip
reports and landings data. For additional information on fishing effort
in fisheries found on Table 1 or 2, NMFS refers the reader to contact
the relevant regional office (contact information included above in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists the number of currently
valid HSFCA permits held. Although this likely overestimates the number
of active participants in many of these fisheries, the number of valid
HSFCA permits is the most reliable data on the potential effort in high
seas fisheries at this time.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine mammal species or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each fishery based on observer data,
logbook data, stranding reports, disentanglement network data, and MMAP
reports. This list includes all species or stocks known to be injured
or killed in a given fishery but also includes species or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of an injury or mortality.
Additionally, species identified by logbook entries, stranding data, or
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP reports) may not be verified. In
Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has designated those stocks driving a fishery's
classification (i.e., the fishery is classified based on serious
injuries and mortalities of a marine mammal stock that are greater than
50 percent [Category I], or greater than 1 percent
[[Page 53350]]
and less than 50 percent [Category II], of a stock's PBR) by a ``\1\''
after the stock's name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several fisheries classified as
Category II that have no recent documented injuries or mortalities of
marine mammals, or fisheries that did not result in a serious injury or
mortality rate greater than 1 percent of a stock's PBR level based on
known interactions. NMFS has classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use similar fishing techniques or
gear that are known to cause mortality or serious injury of marine
mammals, as discussed in the final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063, December
28, 1995), and according to factors listed in the definition of a
``Category II fishery'' in 50 CFR 229.2 (i.e., fishing techniques, gear
used, methods used to deter marine mammals, target species, seasons and
areas fished, qualitative data from logbooks or fisher reports,
stranding data, and the species and distribution of marine mammals in
the area). NMFS has designated those fisheries listed by analogy in
Tables 1 and 2 by a ``\2\'' after the fishery's name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 in which a
portion of the fishing vessels cross the EEZ boundary and therefore
operate both within U.S. waters and on the high seas. These fisheries,
though listed separately between Table 1 or 2 and Table 3, are
considered the same fishery on either side of the EEZ boundary. NMFS
has designated those fisheries in each table by a ``*'' after the
fishery's name.
Table 1--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species
Estimated of vessels/ incidentally killed
persons or injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI deep-set (tuna target) 129.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
longline/set line HI Pelagic
*[supcaret].
False killer whale,
HI Insular \1\
False killer whale,
HI Pelagic \1\
False killer whale,
Palmyra Atoll
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, HI
Risso's dolphin, HI
Short-finned pilot
whale, HI
Striped dolphin, HI
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA thresher shark/ 25............... Bottlenose dolphin,
swordfish drift gillnet CA/OR/WA offshore
(>=14 in mesh) *.
California sea lion,
U.S.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA
Northern elephant
seal, CA breeding
Northern right-whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Risso's dolphin, CA/
OR/WA
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA
\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA halibut/white seabass 50............... California sea lion,
and other species set U.S.
gillnet (>3.5 in mesh).
Harbor seal, CA
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA
Northern elephant
seal, CA breeding
Sea otter, CA
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
CA yellowtail, barracuda, 30............... California sea lion,
and white seabass drift U.S.
gillnet (mesh size >=3.5
in and <14 in) \2\.
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
AK Bristol Bay salmon 1,863............ Beluga whale, Bristol
drift gillnet \2\. Bay
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Bristol Bay salmon set 982.............. Beluga whale, Bristol
gillnet \2\. Bay
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
AK Kodiak salmon set 188.............. Harbor porpoise, GOA
gillnet. \1\
Harbor seal, GOA
Sea otter, Southwest
AK
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
[[Page 53351]]
AK Cook Inlet salmon set 738.............. Beluga whale, Cook
gillnet. Inlet
Dall's porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA
Harbor seal, GOA
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific \1\
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift 569.............. Beluga whale, Cook
gillnet. Inlet
Dall's porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA
\1\
Harbor seal, GOA
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian 162.............. Dall's porpoise, AK
Islands salmon drift
gillnet \2\.
Harbor porpoise, GOA
Harbor seal, GOA
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
AK Peninsula/Aleutian 114.............. Harbor porpoise,
Islands salmon set Bering Sea
gillnet \2\.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound 537.............. Dall's porpoise, AK
salmon drift gillnet.
Harbor porpoise, GOA
\1\
Harbor seal, GOA
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific
Sea otter, South
Central AK
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S. \1\
AK Southeast salmon drift 474.............. Dall's porpoise, AK
gillnet.
Harbor porpoise,
Southeast AK
Harbor seal,
Southeast AK
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific \1\
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
AK Yakutat salmon set 167.............. Gray whale, Eastern
gillnet \2\. North Pacific
Harbor porpoise,
Southeastern AK
Harbor seal,
Southeast AK
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific (Southeast
AK)
WA Puget Sound Region 210.............. Dall's porpoise, CA/
salmon drift gillnet OR/WA
(includes all inland
waters south of US-Canada
border and eastward of
the Bonilla-Tatoosh line-
Treaty Indian fishing is
excluded).
Harbor porpoise,
inland WA \1\
Harbor seal, WA
inland
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse 82............... Humpback whale,
seine. Central North
Pacific \1\
AK Kodiak salmon purse 379.............. Humpback whale,
seine. Central North
Pacific \1\
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 34............... Bearded seal, AK
Islands flatfish trawl.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
Harbor porpoise,
Bering Sea
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea
Humpback whale,
Western North
Pacific \1\
Killer whale, AK
resident \1\
Killer whale, GOA,
AI, BS transient \1\
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
Ringed seal, AK
Ribbon seal, AK
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S. \1\
Walrus, AK
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 95............... Bearded seal, AK
Islands pollock trawl.
Dall's porpoise, AK
Harbor seal, AK
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific
Humpback whale,
Western North
Pacific
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
Ribbon seal, AK
Ringed seal, AK
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S. \1\
[[Page 53352]]
Bering Sea, Aleutian 28............... Killer whale, ENP AK
Islands rockfish trawl. resident \1\
Killer whale, GOA,
AI, BS transient \1\
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP
FISHERIES:
CA spot prawn pot......... 27............... Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\
CA Dungeness crab pot..... 534.............. Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\
OR Dungeness crab pot..... 433.............. Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot.... 309.............. Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\
WA coastal Dungeness crab 228.............. Gray whale, Eastern
pot/trap. North Pacific
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI shallow-set (swordfish 20............... Bottlenose dolphin,
target) longline/set line HI Pelagic
*[supcaret].
False killer whale,
HI Pelagic \1\
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific
Kogia sp. whale
(Pygmy or dwarf
sperm whale), HI
Risso's dolphin, HI
Short-finned pilot
whale, HI
Striped dolphin, HI
American Samoa longline 24............... False killer whale,
\2\. American Samoa
Rough-toothed
dolphin, American
Samoa
HI shortline \2\.......... 11............... None documented
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, 1702............. Harbor porpoise,
Norton Sound, Kotzebue Bering Sea
salmon gillnet.
AK miscellaneous finfish 3................ Steller sea lion,
set gillnet. Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound 30............... Harbor seal, GOA
salmon set gillnet.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK roe herring and food/ 990.............. None documented
bait herring gillnet.
CA set gillnet (mesh size 304.............. None documented
<3.5 in).
HI inshore gillnet........ 36............... Bottlenose dolphin,
HI
Spinner dolphin, HI
WA Grays Harbor salmon 24............... Harbor seal, OR/WA
drift gillnet (excluding coast
treaty Tribal fishing).
WA/OR herring, smelt, 913.............. None documented
shad, sturgeon, bottom
fish, mullet, perch,
rockfish gillnet.
WA/OR lower Columbia River 110.............. California sea lion,
(includes tributaries) U.S.
drift gillnet.
Harbor seal, OR/WA
coast
WA Willapa Bay drift 82............... Harbor seal, OR/WA
gillnet. coast
Northern elephant
seal, CA breeding
PURSE SEINE, BEACH SEINE,
ROUND HAUL, THROW NET AND
TANGLE NET FISHERIES:
AK Southeast salmon purse 415.............. None documented in
seine. the most recent 5
years of data
AK Metlakatla salmon purse 10............... None documented
seine.
AK miscellaneous finfish 1................ None documented
beach seine.
AK miscellaneous finfish 2................ None documented
purse seine.
AK octopus/squid purse 0................ None documented
seine.
AK roe herring and food/ 6................ None documented
bait herring beach seine.
AK roe herring and food/ 367.............. None documented
bait herring purse seine.
AK salmon beach seine..... 31............... None documented
AK salmon purse seine 935.............. Harbor seal, GOA
(excluding salmon purse
seine fisheries listed as
Category II).
CA anchovy, mackerel, 65............... California sea lion,
sardine purse seine. U.S.
Harbor seal, CA
CA squid purse seine...... 80............... Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA Short-
beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
CA tuna purse seine *..... 10............... None documented
WA/OR sardine purse seine. 42............... None documented
WA (all species) beach 235.............. None documented
seine or drag seine.
WA/OR herring, smelt, 130.............. None documented
squid purse seine or
lampara.
[[Page 53353]]
WA salmon purse seine..... 440.............. None documented
WA salmon reef net........ 53............... None documented
HI opelu/akule net........ 22............... None documented
HI inshore purse seine.... <3............... None documented
HI throw net, cast net.... 29............... None documented
HI hukilau net............ 26............... None documented
HI lobster tangle net..... 0................ None documented
DIP NET FISHERIES:
CA squid dip net.......... 115.............. None documented
WA/OR smelt, herring dip 119.............. None documented
net.
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
CA marine shellfish unknown.......... None documented
aquaculture.
CA salmon enhancement >1............... None documented
rearing pen.
CA white seabass 13............... California sea lion,
enhancement net pens. U.S.
HI offshore pen culture... 2................ None documented
OR salmon ranch........... 1................ None documented
WA/OR salmon net pens..... 14............... California sea lion,
U.S.
Harbor seal, WA
inland waters
TROLL FISHERIES:
AK North Pacific halibut, 1,320 (120 AK)... None documented
AK bottom fish, WA/OR/CA
albacore, groundfish,
bottom fish, CA halibut
non-salmonid troll
fisheries *.
AK salmon troll........... 2,008............ Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
American Samoa tuna troll. 7................ None documented
CA/OR/WA salmon troll..... 4,300............ None documented
HI trolling, rod and reel. 1,560............ Pantropical spotted
dolphin, HI
Commonwealth of the 40............... None documented
Northern Mariana Islands
tuna troll.
Guam tuna troll........... 432.............. None documented
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 154.............. Dall's Porpoise, AK
Islands Pacific cod Northern fur seal,
longline. Eastern Pacific
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 0................ None documented
Islands rockfish longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 36............... Killer whale, AK
Islands Greenland turbot resident
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 28............... None documented
Islands sablefish
longline.
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut 1,302............ None documented
longline.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 107.............. Steller sea lion,
cod longline. Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish 0................ None documented
longline.
AK Gulf of Alaska 291.............. Sperm whale, North
sablefish longline. Pacific
AK halibut longline/set 2,280............ None documented in
line (State and Federal the most recent 5
waters). years of data
AK octopus/squid longline. 2................ None documented
AK State-managed waters 1,323............ None documented
longline/setline
(including sablefish,
rockfish, lingcod, and
miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, 367.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
bottomfish longline/set CA/OR/WA offshore
line.
WA/OR North Pacific 350.............. None documented
halibut longline/set line.
CA pelagic longline....... 6................ None documented in
the most recent 5
years of data
HI kaka line.............. 17............... None documented
HI vertical longline...... 9................ None documented
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 9................ Ribbon seal, AK
Islands Atka mackerel Steller sea lion,
trawl. Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 93............... Steller sea lion,
Islands Pacific cod trawl. Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish 41............... Northern elephant
trawl. seal, NP
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 62............... Steller sea lion,
cod trawl. Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock 62............... Dall's porpoise, AK
trawl.
Fin whale, Northeast
Pacific
Northern elephant
seal, North Pacific
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish 34............... None documented
trawl.
AK food/bait herring trawl 4................ None documented
AK miscellaneous finfish 282.............. None documented
otter/beam trawl.
[[Page 53354]]
AK shrimp otter trawl and 33............... None documented
beam trawl (statewide and
Cook Inlet).
AK State-managed waters of 2................ None documented
Cook Inlet, Kachemak Bay,
Prince William Sound,
Southeast AK groundfish
trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl... 53............... None documented
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl..... 300.............. None documented
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl. 160-180.......... California sea lion,
U.S.
Dall's porpoise, CA/
OR/WA
Harbor seal, OR/WA
coast
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP
FISHERIES:
AK statewide miscellaneous 243.............. None documented
finfish pot.
AK Aleutian Islands 8................ None documented
sablefish pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 68............... None documented
Islands Pacific cod pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 296.............. None documented
Islands crab pot.
AK Bering Sea sablefish 6................ None documented
pot.
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot 389.............. None documented
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 154.............. Harbor seal, GOA
cod pot.
AK Southeast Alaska crab 415.............. Humpback whale,
pot. Central North
Pacific (Southeast
AK)
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp 274.............. Humpback whale,
pot. Central North
Pacific (Southeast
AK)
AK shrimp pot, except 210.............. None documented
Southeast.
AK octopus/squid pot...... 26............... None documented
AK snail pot.............. 1................ None documented
CA coonstripe shrimp, rock 305.............. Gray whale, Eastern
crab, tanner crab pot or North Pacific
trap.
Harbor seal, CA
CA spiny lobster.......... 225.............. Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific
OR/CA hagfish pot or trap. 54............... None documented
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap..... 254.............. None documented
WA Puget Sound Dungeness 249.............. None documented
crab pot/trap.
HI crab trap.............. 9................ None documented
HI fish trap.............. 9................ None documented
HI lobster trap........... <3............... Hawaiian monk seal
HI shrimp trap............ 4................ None documented
HI crab net............... 6................ None documented
HI Kona crab loop net..... 48............... None documented
HANDLINE AND JIG FISHERIES:
AK miscellaneous finfish 456.............. None documented
handline/hand troll and
mechanical jig.
AK North Pacific halibut 180.............. None documented
handline/hand troll and
mechanical jig.
AK octopus/squid handline. 0................ None documented
American Samoa bottomfish. 12............... None documented
Commonwealth of the 28............... None documented
Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish........... >300............. None documented
HI aku boat, pole, and 3................ None documented
line.
HI Main Hawaiian Islands 567.............. Hawaiian monk seal
deep-sea bottomfish
handline.
HI inshore handline....... 378.............. None documented
HI tuna handline.......... 459.............. None documented
WA groundfish, bottomfish 679.............. None documented
jig.
Western Pacific squid jig. <3............... None documented
HARPOON FISHERIES:
CA swordfish harpoon...... 30............... None documented
POUND NET/WEIR FISHERIES:
AK herring spawn on kelp 411.............. None documented
pound net.
AK Southeast herring roe/ 4................ None documented
food/bait pound net.
WA herring brush weir..... 1................ None documented
HI bullpen trap........... <3............... None documented
BAIT PENS:
WA/OR/CA bait pens........ 13............... California sea lion,
U.S.
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Coastwide scallop dredge.. 108 (12 AK)...... None documented
[[Page 53355]]
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL
COLLECTION FISHERIES:
AK abalone................ 0................ None documented
AK clam................... 156.............. None documented
WA herring spawn on kelp.. 4................ None documented
AK Dungeness crab......... 2................ None documented
AK herring spawn on kelp.. 266.............. None documented
AK urchin and other fish/ 521.............. None documented
shellfish.
CA abalone................ 0................ None documented
CA sea urchin............. 583.............. None documented
HI black coral diving..... <3............... None documented
HI fish pond.............. 16............... None documented
HI handpick............... 57............... None documented
HI lobster diving......... 29............... None documented
HI spearfishing........... 143.............. None documented
WA/CA kelp................ 4................ None documented
WA/OR sea urchin, other 637.............. None documented
clam, octopus, oyster,
sea cucumber, scallop,
ghost shrimp hand, dive,
or mechanical collection.
WA shellfish aquaculture.. 684.............. None documented
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING
VESSEL (CHARTER BOAT)
FISHERIES:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial >7,000 (2,702 AK) Killer whale, stock
passenger fishing vessel. unknown
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
HI charter vessel......... 114.............. Pantropical spotted
dolphin, HI
LIVE FINFISH/SHELLFISH
FISHERIES:
CA nearshore finfish live 93............... None documented
trap/hook-and-line.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AK--Alaska; CA--
California; GOA--Gulf of Alaska; HI--Hawaii; OR--Oregon; WA--
Washington; \1\ Fishery classified based on serious injuries and
mortalities of this stock, which are greater than 50 percent (Category
I) or greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of
the stock's PBR; \2\ Fishery classified by analogy; * Fishery has an
associated high seas component listed in Table 3; [supcaret] The list
of marine mammal species or stocks killed or injured in this fishery
is identical to the list of species or stocks killed or injured in
high seas component of the fishery, minus species or stocks have
geographic ranges exclusively on the high seas. The species or stocks
are found, and the fishery remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ
boundary. Therefore, the EEZ components of these fisheries pose the
same risk to marine mammals as the components operating on the high
seas.[supcaret]
Table 2--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean,
Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species
Estimated of vessels/ incidentally killed
persons or injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet...... 5,509............ Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf
of Maine
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast
Risso's dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin,
WNA
Northeast sink gillnet.... 4,375............ Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Fin whale, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF \1\
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Hooded seal, WNA
[[Page 53356]]
Humpback whale, Gulf
of Maine
Long-finned Pilot
whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast
North Atlantic right
whale, WNA
Risso's dolphin, WNA
Short-finned Pilot
whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin,
WNA
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic 11,693........... Harbor seal, WNA
American lobster trap/pot.
Humpback whale, Gulf
of Maine
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast
North Atlantic right
whale, WNA \1\
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, 234.............. Atlantic spotted
Gulf of Mexico large dolphin, GMX
pelagics longline*. continental and
oceanic
Atlantic spotted
dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Cuvier's beaked
whale, WNA
Gervais beaked whale,
GMX oceanic
Killer whale, GMX
oceanic
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\
Mesoplodon beaked
whale, WNA
Northern bottlenose
whale, WNA
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, Northern
GMX
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, WNA
Risso's dolphin,
Northern GMX
Risso's dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot
whale, Northern GMX
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\
Sperm whale, GMX
oceanic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Chesapeake Bay inshore 1,126............ None documented in
gillnet \2\. the most recent 5
years of data
Gulf of Mexico gillnet \2\ 724.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound, and
estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal
NC inshore gillnet........ 1,323............ Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system \1\
Northeast anchored float 421.............. Harbor seal, WNA
gillnet \2\.
Humpback whale, Gulf
of Maine
White-sided dolphin,
WNA
Northeast drift gillnet 311.............. None documented
\2\.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet 357.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
\2\. Southern Migratory
coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
SC/GA coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic 30............... Bottlenose dolphin,
shark gillnet. Central FL coastal
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal
North Atlantic right
whale, WNA
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water 322.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
trawl (including pair WNA offshore
trawl).
Common dolphin, WNA
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA
Risso's dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin,
WNA \1\
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl. 631.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
\1\
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor seal, WNA
[[Page 53357]]
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\
Risso's dolphin, WNA
\1\
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\
White-sided dolphin,
WNA
Northeast mid-water trawl 1,103............ Gray seal, WNA
(including pair trawl).
Harbor seal, WNA
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\
Common dolphin, WNA
White-sided dolphin,
WNA
Northeast bottom trawl.... 2,987............ Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian
East Coast
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin,
WNA \1\
Southeastern U.S. 4,950............ Atlantic spotted
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico dolphin, GMX
shrimp trawl. continental and
oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin,
SC/GA coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX continental
shelf
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound,
estuarine \1\
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Southeastern U.S. 1,282............ Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Biscayne Bay
stone crab trap/pot \2\. estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
FL Bay
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound,
estuarine (FL west
coast portion)
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville
estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal
Atlantic mixed species 3,467............ Fin whale, WNA
trap/pot \2\.
Humpback whale, Gulf
of Maine
Atlantic blue crab trap/ 8,557............ Bottlenose dolphin,
pot. Charleston estuarine
system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
SC/GA coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GA/Southern
SC estuarine system
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern GA
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system \1\
West Indian manatee,
FL \1\
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden 40-42............ Bottlenose dolphin,
purse seine. GMX bay, sound,
estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal
\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal
\1\
Mid-Atlantic menhaden 5................ Bottlenose dolphin,
purse seine \2\. Northern Migratory
coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach 565.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
seine. Northern NC
estuarine system \1\
[[Page 53358]]
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal \1\
NC long haul seine........ 372.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system \1\
STOP NET FISHERIES:
NC roe mullet stop net.... 13............... Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system \1\
POUND NET FISHERIES:
VA pound net.............. 67............... Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal \1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Caribbean gillnet......... >991............. None documented in
the most recent 5
years of data
DE River inshore gillnet.. unknown.......... None documented in
the most recent 5
years of data
Long Island Sound inshore unknown.......... None documented in
gillnet. the most recent 5
years of data
RI, southern MA (to unknown.......... None documented in
Monomoy Island), and NY the most recent 5
Bight (Raritan and Lower years of data
NY Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore unknown.......... None documented
gillnet.
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic shellfish bottom >58.............. None documented
trawl.
Gulf of Mexico butterfish 2................ Bottlenose dolphin,
trawl. Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
continental shelf
Gulf of Mexico mixed 20............... None documented
species trawl.
GA cannonball jellyfish 1................ Bottlenose dolphin,
trawl. South Carolina/
Georgia
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
Finfish aquaculture....... 48............... Harbor seal, WNA
Shellfish aquaculture..... unknown.......... None documented
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic >7............... Harbor seal, WNA
herring purse seine.
Gray seal, WNA
Gulf of Maine menhaden >2............... None documented
purse seine.
FL West Coast sardine 10............... Bottlenose dolphin,
purse seine. Eastern GMX coastal
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse 5................ Long-finned pilot
seine *. whale, WNA
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA
LONGLINE/HOOK-AND-LINE
FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic >1,207........... None documented
bottom longline/hook-and-
line.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid- 428.............. Humpback whale, Gulf
Atlantic tuna, shark of Maine
swordfish hook-and-line/
harpoon.
Southeastern U.S. >5,000........... Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, GMX continental
and Caribbean snapper- shelf
grouper and other reef
fish bottom longline/hook-
and-line.
Southeastern U.S. <125............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Eastern GMX coastal
shark bottom longline/
hook-and-line.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
continental shelf
Southeastern U.S. 1,446............ None documented
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean pelagic
hook-and-line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of unknown.......... None documented
Mexico trotline.
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Caribbean mixed species >501............. None documented
trap/pot.
Caribbean spiny lobster >197............. None documented
trap/pot.
FL spiny lobster trap/pot. 1,268............ Bottlenose dolphin,
Biscayne Bay
estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
FL Bay estuarine
Gulf of Mexico blue crab 4,113............ Bottlenose dolphin,
trap/pot. Western GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal
[[Page 53359]]
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound,
estuarine
West Indian manatee,
FL
Gulf of Mexico mixed unknown.......... None documented
species trap/pot.
Southeastern U.S. 10............... None documented
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
golden crab trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/ unknown.......... None documented
pot.
STOP SEINE/WEIR/POUND NET/
FLOATING TRAP FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine herring and >1............... Gray seal, WNA
Atlantic mackerel stop
seine/weir.
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast
White-sided dolphin,
WNA
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab 2,600............ None documented
stop seine/weir.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed unknown.......... Bottlenose dolphin,
species stop seine/weir/ Northern NC
pound net (except the NC estuarine system
roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap.......... 9................ None documented
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine mussel unknown.......... None documented
dredge.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid- >403............. None documented
Atlantic sea scallop
dredge.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of 7,000............ None documented
Mexico oyster dredge.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic offshore unknown.......... None documented
surf clam and quahog
dredge.
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Caribbean haul/beach seine 15............... None documented in
the most recent 5
years of data
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach unknown.......... None documented
seine.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic 25............... None documented
haul/beach seine.
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL
COLLECTION FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of 20,000........... None documented
Mexico, Caribbean
shellfish dive, hand/
mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, unknown.......... None documented
hand/mechanical
collection.
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast unknown.......... None documented
Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic,
and Caribbean cast net.
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING
VESSEL (CHARTER BOAT)
FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of 4,000............ Bottlenose dolphin,
Mexico, Caribbean Eastern GMX coastal
commercial passenger
fishing vessel.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin,
Biscayne Bay
estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound,
estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2: DE--Delaware; FL--
Florida; GA--Georgia; GME/BF--Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX--Gulf of
Mexico; MA--Massachusetts; NC--North Carolina; SC- South Carolina; VA--
Virginia; WNA--Western North Atlantic; \1\ Fishery classified based on
serious injuries and mortalities of this stock, which are greater than
50 percent (Category I) or greater than 1 percent and less than 50
percent (Category II) of the stock's PBR; \2\ Fishery classified by
analogy; * Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in
Table 3.
Table 3--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of HSFCA Marine mammal species and stocks
Fishery description permits incidentally killed or injured
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONGLINE FISHERIES:............................
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species * +...... 79 Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
[[Page 53360]]
Cuvier's beaked whale, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA
Pygmy sperm whale, WNA
Risso's dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Deep-set 124 Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic
component) *[supcaret] +.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
False killer whale, HI Pelagic
False killer whale, unknown
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI
Pantropical spotted dolphin, unknown
Risso's dolphin, HI
Risso's dolphin, unknown
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, unknown
Striped dolphin, HI
Striped dolphin, unknown
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DRIFT GILLNET FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species.......... 2 Undetermined
Pacific Highly Migratory Species 4 Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
*[supcaret].
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species **....... 5 Undetermined
CCAMLR..................................... 0 Antarctic fur seal
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 0 Undetermined
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries............... 38 Undetermined
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 3 Undetermined
POT VESSEL FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species **........ 3 Undetermined
South Pacific Albacore Troll............... 3 Undetermined
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 3 Undetermined
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
CCAMLR..................................... 0 None documented
South Pacific Albacore Troll............... 11 Undetermined
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries **............ 10 Undetermined
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Shallow-set 28 Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic
component) *[supcaret] +.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific
Kogia sp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm
whale), HI
Kogia sp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm
whale), unknown
Risso's dolphin, HI
Risso's dolphin, unknown
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, unknown
Striped dolphin, HI
Striped dolphin, unknown
HANDLINE/POLE AND LINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species.......... 3 Undetermined
Pacific Highly Migratory Species........... 40 Undetermined
South Pacific Albacore Troll............... 7 Undetermined
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 6 Undetermined
TROLL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species.......... 5 Undetermined
South Pacific Albacore Troll............... 36 Undetermined
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries **............ 3 Undetermined
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 22 Undetermined
LINERS NEI FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species **........ 1 Undetermined
South Pacific Albacore Troll............... 1 Undetermined
[[Page 53361]]
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 1 Undetermined
FACTORY MOTHERSHIP FISHERIES:
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 1 Undetermined
MULTIPURPOSE VESSELS NEI FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species.......... 1 Undetermined
Pacific Highly Migratory Species **........ 5 Undetermined
South Pacific Albacore Troll............... 4 Undetermined
Western Pacific Pelagic.................... 4 Undetermined
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category III
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * +....... 96 None documented in the most recent 5
years of data
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species 0 Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
*[supcaret].
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * 6 None documented
[supcaret].
TROLL FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species *......... 263 None documented
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3:
GMX--Gulf of Mexico; NEI--Not Elsewhere Identified; WNA--Western North Atlantic.
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2.
The number of permits listed in Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high seas component of
the fishery.
** These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004), the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without
a South Pacific Tuna Treaty license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because HSFCA permits
are valid for five years, permits obtained in past years exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types
that are now unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear types, it does not represent
effort. In order to land fish species, fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for
unauthorized gear types expire, the permit-holder will be required to obtain a permit for an authorized gear
type.
+ The marine mammal species or stocks listed as killed or injured in this fishery has been observed taken by
this fishery on the high seas.
[supcaret] The list of marine mammal species or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the
list of marine mammal species or stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of the fishery, minus
species or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively in coastal waters, because the marine mammal species
or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the same on both sides of the EEZ boundary.
Therefore, the high seas components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components
of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
Table 4--Fisheries Affected by Take Reduction Teams and Plans
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take reduction plans Affected fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Large Whale Take Category I
Reduction Plan (ALWTRP)--50 CFR Mid-Atlantic gillnet
229.32.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot
Northeast sink gillnet
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
Northeast anchored float gillnet
Northeast drift gillnet
Southeast Atlantic gillnet
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet *
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot
[supcaret]
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Category I
Plan (BDTRP)--50 CFR 229.35. Mid-Atlantic gillnet
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine
NC inshore gillnet
NC long haul seine
NC roe mullet stop net
Southeast Atlantic gillnet
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl [supcaret]
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot
[supcaret]
VA pound net
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Category I
Plan (FKWTRP)--50 CFR 229.37. HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/
set line
Category II
HI shallow-set (swordfish target)
longline/set line
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Category I
Plan (HPTRP)--50 CFR 229.33 (New Mid-Atlantic gillnet
England) and 229.34 (Mid- Northeast sink gillnet
Atlantic).
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Category I
Plan (PLTRP)--50 CFR 229.36. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline
[[Page 53362]]
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Category II
Reduction Plan (POCTRP)--50 CFR CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
229.31. gillnet (>=14 in mesh)
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Category II
Team (ATGTRT). Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl)
Northeast bottom trawl
Northeast mid-water trawl (including
pair trawl)
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Category I
Team (FKWTRT). HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/
set line
Category II
HI shallow-set (swordfish target)
longline/set line
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S.
waters; [supcaret] Only applicable to the portion of the fishery
operating in the Atlantic Ocean;
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration at the proposed rule state that this rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. No comments were received on that certification and no new
information has been discovered to change that conclusion. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been
prepared.
This rule contains collection-of-information requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The collection of information for the
registration of individuals under the MMPA has been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0648-
0293 (0.15 hours per report for new registrants and 0.09 hours per
report for renewals). The requirement for reporting marine mammal
injuries or mortalities has been approved by OMB under OMB control
number 0648-0292 (0.15 hours per report). These estimates include the
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send comments regarding these reporting
burden estimates or any other aspect of the collections of information,
including suggestions for reducing burden, to NMFS and OMB (see
ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for regulations to implement section
118 of the MMPA in June 1995. NMFS revised that EA relative to
classifying U.S. commercial fisheries on the LOF in December 2005. Both
the 1995 EA and the 2005 EA concluded that implementation of MMPA
section 118 regulations would not have a significant impact on the
human environment. This rule would not make any significant change in
the management of reclassified fisheries; therefore, this rule is not
expected to change the analysis or conclusion of the 2005 EA. The
Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) recommends agencies review EAs
every five years; therefore, NMFS reviewed the 2005 EA in 2009. NMFS
concluded that, because there have been no changes to the process used
to develop the LOF and implement section 118 of the MMPA (including no
new alternatives and no additional or new impacts on the human
environment), there is no need to update the 2005 EA at this time. If
NMFS takes a management action, for example, through the development of
a TRP, NMFS would first prepare an environmental document, as required
under NEPA, specific to that action.
This rule would not affect species listed as threatened or
endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or their associated
critical habitat. The impacts of numerous fisheries have been analyzed
in various biological opinions, and this rule will not affect the
conclusions of those opinions. The classification of fisheries on the
LOF is not considered to be a management action that would adversely
affect threatened or endangered species. If NMFS takes a management
action, for example, through the development of a TRP, NMFS would
conduct consultation under ESA section 7 for that action.
This rule would have no adverse impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries interacting with marine mammals
through information collected from observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
References
Baker, J.D., A.L. Harting, T.A. Wurth, and T.C. Johanos. 2011.
Dramatic shifts in Hawaiian monk seal distribution predicted from
divergent regional trends. Marine Mammal Science 27: 78-93.
Carretta, J.V. and L. Enriquez. 2012. Marine mammal and seabird
bycatch in California gillnet fisheries in 2010. NOAA SWFSC and SWR
Administrative Report LJ-12-01. 15p.
Carretta, J.V., K.A. Forney, M.S. Lowry, J. Barlow, J. Baker, D.
Johnston, B. Hanson, M.M. Muto, D. Lynch, L. Carswell. 2009. U.S.
Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2008. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-434. 340p.
Carretta, J.V., E. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R. Lang, K.A. Forney, J.
Baker, B. Hanson, K Martien, M.M. Muto, M.S. Lowry, J. Barlow, D.
Lynch, L. Carswell, R.L. Brownell Jr., D.K. Mattila, and M.C. Hill.
2012. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2012. NOAA
Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-504. 378p.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2007. Florida
Manatee Management Plan. Available at: https://myfwc.com/media/214332/manatee_mgmt_plan.pdf.
Garrison, L.P. and L. Stokes. 2012 Estimated bycatch of marine
mammals and sea turtles in the U.S. Atlantic pelagic longline fleet
during 2011. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA NMFS-SEFSC-632. 61 p.
[[Page 53363]]
Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission. 2010. Bait Fishery.
Available at: https://menhaden.gsfmc.org/2010/%20Bait%20Fishery.shtm.
Hatfield B.B, J.A. Ames, J.A. Estes, M.T. Tinker, A.B. Johnson, M.M
Staedler, M.D. Harris. 2011. Sea otter mortality in fish and
shellfish traps: estimating potential impacts and exploring possible
solutions. Endangered Species Research. 13: 219-229.
McCracken, M.L. 2010. Adjustments to false killer whale and short-
finned pilot whale bycatch estimates. PIFSC Working Paper WP-10-007.
Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries
Service. 23p.
McCracken, M.L. 2011. Assessment of incidental interactions with
marine mammals in the Hawaii longline deep and shallow set fisheries
from 2006 through 2010. PIFSC Working Paper WP-11-012. Pacific
Islands Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service.
30p.
Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Monitoring
Branch. 2012. The Hawaii-based longline logbook summary report,
January-December 2011. NMFS, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science
Center Data report DR-12-003. 14p.
Dated: August 22, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-21054 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P