Availability of Records and Information, 53277-53285 [2013-21053]
Download as PDF
53277
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 12, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.1880 is amended by
adding paragraphs (p)(3), (p)(4), (q)(3)
and (q)(4) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1880
matter.
*
Control strategy: Particulate
*
*
(p) * * *
*
*
(3) The Ohio portion of the
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH
nonattainment area (Washington
County), as submitted on February 29,
2012, and supplemented on April 30,
2013. The maintenance plan determines
the insignificance of motor vehicle
emissions budgets for Washington
County.
(4) The Ohio portion of the Wheeling,
WV-OH nonattainment area (Belmont
County), as submitted on April 16, 2012,
and supplemented on April 30, 2013.
The maintenance plan determines the
insignificance of motor vehicle
emissions budgets for Belmont County.
(q) * * *
(3) Ohio’s 2005 NOX, primary PM2.5,
and SO2 and 2007/2008 ammonia and
VOC emissions inventories satisfy the
emission inventory requirements of
section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for
Washington County.
(4) Ohio’s 2005 NOX, primary PM2.5,
and SO2 and 2007/2008 ammonia and
VOC emissions inventories satisfy the
emission inventory requirements of
section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for
Belmont County.
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
3. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
4. Section 81.336 is amended by
revising the entries for ParkersburgMarietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WVOH in the table entitled ‘‘Ohio—PM2.5
(Annual NAAQS)’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 81.336
*
*
Ohio.
*
*
*
OHIO—PM2.5
[Annual NAAQS]
Designation a
Designated area
Date 1
*
*
*
*
*
*
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH:
Washington County .............................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Wheeling, WV-OH:
Belmont County ...................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Type
*
8/29/2013
Attainment.
*
8/29/2013
Attainment.
*
a Includes
1 This
*
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 612
RIN 3145–AA56
Availability of Records and Information
National Science Foundation.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document sets forth
revisions of the Foundation’s
regulations under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). The revisions
implement the provision of the Open
FOIA Act of 2009 which amended
Exemption 3, update procedural
provisions, and allow for multi-track
processing of requests.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
The final rule will be effective
September 30, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Matthew Powell, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
National Science Foundation, telephone
703–292–8060 or email mpowell@
nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
14, 2013 the National Science
Foundation (NSF) published a proposed
rule at 78 FR 28173 requesting public
comment on proposed revisions to its
existing FOIA regulations at 45 CFR part
612. No comments were received.
Accordingly, NSF is revising its FOIA
regulations by adopting the revisions as
proposed. This revision of Part 612
implements the provision of the Open
FOIA Act of 2009 which amends
Exemption 3. It also updates and
clarifies several procedural provisions
concerning FOIA administration,
reflects changes in case law, and
includes revised current cost figures for
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2013–20660 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
calculating and charging fees. The
duplication fee will be reduced. In
addition, the Foundation will
implement multi-track processing.
Clarifications and procedural changes
are found at § 612.1(b) (General
Provisions); § 612.3(b) and (f)
(Requirements for making requests);
§ 612.5(a), (b), (c) and (d)(3) (Timing of
responses to requests); § 612.6(a)
(Responses to requests); § 612.7(a)(2), (3)
and (5)(iii) (Exemptions); and
§ 612.10(b)(3), and (c)(1) and (2) (Fees).
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the
revised rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities; the rule addresses the
procedures to be followed when
submitting or responding to requests for
records under the Freedom of
Information Act. For purposes of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4) the revised rule would
not significantly or uniquely affect small
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53278
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
governments and would not result in
increased expenditures by State, local,
and tribal governments, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more.
For purposes of Executive Order 12866,
the revised rule is not a significant
regulatory action requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget.
For the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) it
has been determined that this
rulemaking does not impose any
reporting or recordkeeping requirement
on the public. This rule is not a major
rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (as amended), 5
U.S.C. 804, and will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 612
Administrative practice and
procedure; Freedom of information.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the National Science
Foundation amends 45 CFR Chapter VI
by revising Part 612 as follows:
PART 612—AVAILABILITY OF
RECORDS AND INFORMATION
Sec.
612.1
612.2
612.3
612.4
612.5
612.6
612.7
612.8
612.9
612.10
612.11
General provisions.
Public reading room.
Requirements for making requests.
Responding to requests.
Timing of responses to requests.
Responses to requests.
Exemptions.
Business information.
Appeals.
Fees.
Other rights and services.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
General provisions.
(a) This part contains the rules that
the National Science Foundation (NSF)
follows in processing requests for
records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552.
Information routinely made available to
the public as part of a regular
Foundation activity (for example,
program announcements and
solicitations, summary of awarded
proposals, statistical reports on U.S.
science, press releases issued by the
Office of Legislative and Public Affairs)
may be provided to the public without
reliance on this part. As a matter of
policy, the Foundation also makes
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 612.2
Public reading room.
(a) The Foundation maintains a public
reading room located in the NSF Library
at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 225,
Arlington, Virginia, open during regular
working hours Monday through Friday.
It contains the records that the FOIA
requires to be made regularly available
for public inspection and copying and
has computers and printers available for
public use in accessing records. Also
available for public inspection and
copying are current subject matter
indexes of reading room records.
(b) Information about FOIA and
Privacy at NSF and copies of frequently
requested FOIA releases are available
online at www.nsf.gov/policies/foia/jsp.
Most NSF policy documents, staff
instructions, manuals, and other
publications that affect a member of the
public, are available in electronic form
through the ‘‘Publications’’ option on
the tool bar on NSF’s Home Page on the
World Wide Web at www.nsf.gov.
§ 612.3
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.
§ 612.1
discretionary disclosures of records or
information otherwise exempt under the
FOIA whenever disclosure would not
foreseeably harm an interest protected
by a FOIA exemption. This policy,
however, does not create any right
enforceable in court. When individuals
seek records about themselves under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, NSF
processes those requests under both
NSF’s Privacy regulations at part 613 of
this chapter, and this part.
(b) As used in this part, NSF includes
one component, the Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) of the National
Science Foundation.
Requirements for making requests.
(a) Where to send a request. You may
make a FOIA request for records of the
National Science Foundation by writing
directly to the NSF FOIA Officer, Office
of the General Counsel, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA
22230. Requests may also be sent by
facsimile to (703) 292–9041 or by email
to foia@nsf.gov.
The National Science Foundation
includes one agency component, the
NSF Office of the Inspector General
(OIG). For records maintained by the
NSF OIG, you may write directly to the
Office of Inspector General, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1135, Arlington, VA
22230. Requests may also be sent to the
OIG by facsimile to (703) 292–9158. The
NSF FOIA Officer and the OIG
component will also forward requests as
appropriate.
(b) Form of request. A FOIA request
need not be in any particular format, but
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
it must be in writing, include the
requester’s name and mailing address,
and be clearly identified both on the
envelope and in the letter, or in a
facsimile or electronic mail message as
a Freedom of Information Act or
‘‘FOIA’’ request. It must describe the
records sought with sufficient
specificity to permit identification, and
include agreement to pay applicable
fees as described in § 612.10. NSF and
its OIG component are not obligated to
act upon a request until it meets these
procedural requirements.
(c) Personal records. (1) If you are
making a request for records about
yourself and the records are not
contained in a Privacy Act system of
records, your request will be processed
only under the FOIA, since the Privacy
Act does not apply. If the records about
you are contained in a Privacy Act
system of records, NSF will respond
with information on how to make a
Privacy Act request (see NSF Privacy
Act regulations at 45 CFR 613.2).
(2) If you are making a request for
personal information about another
individual, either a written
authorization signed by that individual
in accordance with § 613.2(f) of this
chapter permitting disclosure of those
records to you, or proof that that
individual is deceased (for example, a
copy of a death certificate or a
published obituary) will help the agency
process your request.
(d) Description of records sought.
Your request must describe the records
that you seek in enough detail to enable
NSF personnel to locate them with a
reasonable amount of effort. A record
must have been created or obtained by
NSF and be under the control of NSF at
the time of the request to be subject to
the FOIA. NSF has no obligation under
the FOIA to create, compile, or obtain a
record to satisfy a FOIA request.
Whenever possible, your request should
include specific descriptive information
about each record sought, such as the
date, title or name, author, recipient,
and subject matter of the record. As a
general rule, the more specific you are
about the records or type of records that
you want, the more likely the
Foundation will be able to locate those
records in response to your request, and
the more likely fees will be reduced or
eliminated. If NSF determines that your
request does not reasonably describe
records, you will be advised what
additional information is needed to
perfect your request or why your request
is otherwise insufficient.
(e) Agreement to pay fees. Your
request must state that you will
promptly pay the total fees chargeable
under this regulation or set a maximum
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
amount you are willing to pay. NSF
does not charge if fees total less than
$25.00. If you seek a waiver of fees,
please see § 612.10(k) for a discussion of
the factors you must address. If you
place an inadequate limit on the amount
you will pay, or have failed to make
payments for previous requests, NSF
may require advance payment (see
§ 612.10(i)).
(f) Receipt date. A request that meets
the requirements of this section will be
considered received on the date it is
properly received by the Office of the
General Counsel or the Office of the
Inspector General. In determining which
records are responsive to a FOIA
request, the NSF will include only
records in its possession as of the date
the NSF or OIG begins its search. If any
other date is used, the NSF or OIG shall
inform the requester of that date.
(g) Publications excluded. For the
purpose of public requests for records
the term ‘‘record’’ does not include
publications which are available to the
public in the Federal Register, or by
sale or free distribution. Such
publications may be obtained from the
Government Printing Office, the
National Technical Information Service,
or through NSF’s Home Page on the
World Wide Web at https://www.nsf.gov/
publications/. Requests for such
publications will be referred to or the
requester informed of the appropriate
source.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 612.4
Processing requests.
(a) Monitoring of requests. The NSF
Office of the General Counsel (OGC), or
such other office as may be designated
by the Director, will serve as the central
office for administering these
regulations. For records maintained by
the Office of Inspector General, that
Office will control incoming requests
made directly or referred to it, dispatch
response letters, and maintain
administrative records. For all other
records maintained by NSF, OGC (or
such other office as may be designated
by the Director) will control incoming
requests, assign them to appropriate
action offices, monitor compliance,
consult with action offices on
disclosure, approve necessary
extensions, dispatch denial and other
letters, and maintain administrative
records.
(b) Consultations and referrals. When
the NSF receives a request for a record
in its possession that originated with
another agency or in which another
agency has a substantial interest, it may
decide that the other agency of the
Federal Government is better able to
determine whether the record should or
should not be released under the FOIA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
(1) If the NSF determines that it is the
agency best able to process the record in
response to the request, then it will do
so, after consultation with the other
interested agencies where appropriate.
(2) If it determines that it is not the
agency best able to process the record,
then it will refer the request regarding
that record (or portion of the record) to
the agency that originated or has a
substantial interest in the record in
question (but only if that agency is
subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the
agency that originated a record will be
presumed to be best able to determine
whether to disclose it.
(3) Whenever NSF refers all or any
part of the responsibility for responding
to a request to another agency, it
ordinarily will notify the requester of
the referral and inform the requester of
the name of each agency to which the
request has been referred and of the part
of the request that has been referred,
unless such notification would disclose
information otherwise exempt.
§ 612.5
Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. The NSF and its
component, OIG, ordinarily will initiate
processing of requests according to their
order of receipt.
(b) Multitrack processing. (1) NSF and
OIG may use two or more processing
tracks by distinguishing between simple
and more complex requests based on the
amount of work and/or time needed to
process the request, including through
limits based on the number of pages
involved. If NSF or OIG does so, it shall
advise requesters in its slower track(s) of
the limits of its faster track(s).
(2) NSF or OIG using multitrack
processing may provide requesters in its
slower track(s) with an opportunity to
limit the scope of their requests in order
to qualify for faster processing within
the specified limits of the NSF’s or
OIG’s faster track(s). The requester may
be contacted by telephone, email, or
letter, whichever is more efficient in
each case.
(c) Time for response. The NSF will
seek to take appropriate action within
20 days of when a request is properly
received or is perfected (excluding the
date of receipt, weekends, and legal
holidays), whichever is later. A request
which otherwise meets the requirements
of § 612.3 is perfected when you have
reasonably described the records sought
under § 612.3(d), and agreed to pay fees
under § 612.3(e), or otherwise met the
fee requirements under § 612.10.
(d) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where
the time limits for processing a request
cannot be met because of unusual
circumstances, as defined in the FOIA,
the NSF FOIA Officer or the OIG
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53279
component will notify the requester as
soon as practicable in writing of the
unusual circumstances and may extend
the response period for up to ten
working days.
(2) Where the extension is for more
than ten working days, the FOIA Officer
or the OIG component will provide the
requester with an opportunity either to
modify the request so that it may be
processed within the ten day extension
period or to arrange an agreed upon
alternative time period with the FOIA
Officer or the OIG component for
processing the request or a modified
request.
(3) Where the NSF reasonably
believes that multiple requests
submitted by a requester, or by a group
of requesters acting in concert,
constitute a single request that would
otherwise involve unusual
circumstances, and the requests involve
clearly related matters, they may be
aggregated. Multiple requests involving
unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(e) Expedited processing. (1) If you
want to receive expedited processing,
you must submit a statement, certified
to be true and correct to the best of your
knowledge and belief, explaining in
detail the basis for requesting expedited
processing.
(2)(i) Requests and appeals will be
given expedited treatment whenever it
is determined that a requester has
demonstrated compelling need by
presenting:
(A) Circumstances in which the lack
of expedited treatment could reasonably
be expected to pose an imminent threat
to the life or physical safety of an
individual; or
(B) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged Federal
government activity, if made by a
person primarily engaged in
disseminating information.
(ii) For example, a requester who is
not a full-time member of the news
media must establish that he or she is
a person whose main professional
activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his
or her sole occupation. Such requester
also must establish a particular urgency
to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the
request, beyond the public’s right to
know about government activity
generally, and that the information
sought has particular value that would
be lost if not disseminated quickly.
(3) Within ten calendar days of receipt
of a request for expedited processing,
the NSF FOIA Officer or OIG
component will decide whether to grant
it, and will notify the requester of the
decision orally or in writing. If a request
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53280
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
for expedited treatment is granted, the
request will be processed as soon as
practicable. If a request for expedited
processing is denied, any appeal of that
decision will be acted on expeditiously.
§ 612.6
Responses to requests.
(a) Acknowledgment of requests. The
NSF or OIG will ordinarily send an
email acknowledgment of all FOIA
requests with an assigned request
number for further reference and an
estimated response date.
(b) Grants of requests. Once the NSF
makes a determination to grant a request
in whole or in part, it will notify the
requester in writing. The NSF will
inform the requester in the notice of any
applicable fee and will disclose records
to the requester promptly on payment of
applicable fees. Records disclosed in
part will be marked or annotated to
show both the amount and the location
of the information deleted where
practicable.
(c) Denials of requests. (1) Denials of
FOIA requests will be made by the
Office of the General Counsel, the Office
of the Inspector General, or such other
office as may be designated by the
Director. The response letter will briefly
set forth the reasons for the denial,
including any FOIA exemption(s)
applied in denying the request. It will
also provide the name and title or
position of the person responsible for
the denial, will inform the requester of
the right to appeal, and will, where
appropriate, include an estimate of the
volume of any requested materials
withheld. An estimate need not be
provided when the volume is otherwise
indicated through deletions on records
disclosed in part, or if providing an
estimate would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption.
(2) Requesters can appeal an agency
determination to withhold all or part of
any requested record; a determination
that a requested record does not exist or
cannot be located; a determination that
what has been requested is not a record
subject to the Act; a disapproval of a fee
category claim by a requester; denial of
a fee waiver or reduction; or a denial of
a request for expedited treatment (see
§ 612.9).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 612.7
Exemptions.
(a) Exemptions from disclosure. The
following types of records or
information may be withholdable as
exempt in full or in part from
mandatory public disclosure:
(1) Exemption 1—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1).
Records specifically authorized and
properly classified pursuant to
Executive Order to be kept secret in the
interest of national defense or foreign
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
policy. NSF does not have classifying
authority and normally does not deal
with classified materials.
(2) Exemption 2—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2).
Records related solely to the internal
personnel rules and practices of NSF.
Examples of records normally exempt
from disclosure include, but are not
limited to: Information relating to
position management and manpower
utilization, such as internal staffing
plans, authorizations or controls, or
involved in determination of the
qualifications of candidates for
employment, advancement, or
promotion including examination
questions and answers.
(3) Exemption 3—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
Records specifically exempted from
disclosure by another statute that either
requires that the information be
withheld in a such way that the agency
has no discretion in the matter; or
establishes particular criteria for
withholding or refers to particular types
of information to be withheld; and, if
enacted after the date of enactment of
the OPEN FOIA Act of 2009, October 28,
2009, specifically cites to 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(3). Examples of records exempt
from disclosure include, but are not
limited to:
(i) Records that disclose any invention
in which the Federal Government owns
or may own a right, title, or interest
(including a nonexclusive license), 35
U.S.C. 205;
(ii) Contractor proposals not
specifically set forth or incorporated by
reference into a contract, 41 U.S.C.
253b(m);
(iii) Information protected by the
Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C.
423;
(iv) Statistical information protected
by section 14(i) of the NSF Act of 1950,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1873(i) and/or
the Confidential Information Protection
and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002, 44
U.S.C. 3501 note.
(4) Exemption 4—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
Trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person, and privileged or confidential.
Information subject to this exemption is
that customarily held in confidence by
the originator(s), including nonprofit
organizations and their employees.
Release of such information is likely to
cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the originator or
submitter, or impair the Foundation’s
ability to obtain such information in the
future. NSF will process information
potentially exempted from disclosure by
Exemption 4 under § 612.8.
Examples of records or information
normally exempt from disclosure
include, but are not limited to:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) Information received in
confidence, such as grant applications,
fellowship applications, and research
proposals prior to award;
(ii) Confidential scientific and
manufacturing processes or
developments, and technical, scientific,
statistical data or other information
developed by a grantee;
(iii) Technical, scientific, or statistical
data, and commercial or financial
information privileged or received in
confidence from an existing or potential
contractor or subcontractor, in
connection with bids, proposals, or
contracts, concerning contract
performance, income, profits, losses,
and expenditures, as well as trade
secrets, inventions, discoveries, or other
proprietary data. When the provisions of
41 U.S.C. 253b(m) or 41 U.S.C. 423 are
met, certain proprietary and source
selection information may also be
withheld under Exemption 3;
(iv) Confidential proprietary
information submitted on a voluntary
basis;
(v) Statements or information
collected in the course of inspections,
investigations, or audits, when such
statements are received in confidence
from the individual and retained in
confidence because they reveal trade
secrets or commercial or financial
information normally considered
confidential or privileged.
(5) Exemption 5–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5).
Inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda
or letters which would not be available
by law to a private party in litigation
with NSF. Factual material contained in
such records will be considered for
release if it can be reasonably segregated
and is not otherwise exempt. Examples
of records exempt from disclosure
include, but are not limited to:
(i) Those portions of reports,
memoranda, correspondence,
workpapers, minutes of meetings, and
staff papers, containing evaluations,
advice, opinions, suggestions, or other
deliberative material that are prepared
for use within NSF or within the
Executive Branch of the Government by
agency personnel and others acting in a
consultant or advisory capacity;
(ii) Advance information on proposed
NSF plans to procure, lease, or
otherwise acquire, or dispose of
materials, real estate, facilities, services
or functions, when such information
would provide undue or unfair
competitive advantage to private
interests or impede legitimate
government functions;
(iii) Negotiating positions or limits at
least until the execution of a contract
(including a grant or cooperative
agreement) or the completion of the
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
action to which the negotiating
positions were applicable. They may
also be exempt pursuant to other
provisions of this section;
(iv) Trade secret or other confidential
research development, or commercial
information owned by the Government,
where premature release is likely to
affect the Government’s negotiating
position or other commercial interest;
(iv) Records prepared for use in
proceedings before any Federal or State
court or administrative body;
(vi) Evaluations of and comments on
specific grant applications, research
projects or proposals, fellowship
applications or nominations or other
individual awards, or potential
contractors and their products, whether
made by NSF personnel or by external
reviewers acting either individually or
in panels, committees or similar groups;
(vii) Preliminary, draft or unapproved
documents, such as opinions,
recommendations, evaluations,
decisions, or studies conducted or
supported by NSF;
(viii) Proposed budget requests, and
supporting projections used or arising in
the preparation and/or execution of a
budget; proposed annual and multi-year
policy, priorities, program and financial
plan and supporting papers;
(ix) Those portions of official reports
of inspection, reports of the Inspector
General, audits, investigations, or
surveys pertaining to safety, security, or
the internal management,
administration, or operation of NSF,
when these records have traditionally
been treated by the courts as privileged
against disclosure in litigation.
(6) Exemption 6–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6).
Personnel and medical files and similar
files, the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy. The
exemption may apply to protect the
privacy of living persons and of living
close survivors of a deceased person
identified in a record. Information in
such files which is not otherwise
exempt from disclosure pursuant to
other provisions of this section will be
released to the subject or to his
designated legal representative, and may
be disclosed to others with the subject’s
written consent. Examples of records
exempt from disclosure include, but are
not limited to:
(i) Reports, records, and other
materials pertaining to individual cases
in which disciplinary or other
administrative action has been or may
be taken. Opinions and orders resulting
from those administrative or
disciplinary proceedings shall be
disclosed without identifying details if
used, cited, or relied upon as precedent;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
(ii) Records compiled to evaluate or
adjudicate the suitability of candidates
for employment, and the eligibility of
individuals (civilian or contractor
employees) for security clearances, or
for access to classified information;
(iii) Reports and evaluations which
reflect upon the qualifications or
competence of individuals;
(iv) Personal information such as
home addresses and telephone and
facsimile numbers, private email
addresses, social security numbers,
dates of birth, marital status and the
like;
(v) The exemption also applies when
the fact of the existence or nonexistence
of a responsive record would itself
reveal personal, private information,
and the public interest in disclosure is
not sufficient to outweigh the privacy
interest.
(7) Exemption 7–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7).
Records or information compiled for
civil or criminal law enforcement
purposes, including the implementation
of Executive Orders or regulations
issued pursuant to law. This exemption
may exempt from mandatory disclosure
records not originally created, but later
gathered, for law enforcement purposes.
(i) This exemption applies only to the
extent that the production of such law
enforcement records or information:
(A) Could reasonably be expected to
interfere with enforcement proceedings;
(B) Would deprive a person of the
right to a fair trial or an impartial
adjudication;
(C) Could reasonably be expected to
constitute an unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy of a living person, or
living close survivors of a deceased
person identified in a record;
(D) Could reasonably be expected to
disclose the identity of a confidential
source, including a source within the
Federal Government, or a State, local, or
foreign agency or authority, or any
private institution, that furnished
information on a confidential basis; and
information furnished by a confidential
source and obtained by a criminal law
enforcement authority in a criminal
investigation;
(E) Would disclose techniques and
procedures for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions, or would
disclose guidelines for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions if such
disclosure could reasonably be expected
to risk circumvention of the law, or
(F) Could reasonably be expected to
endanger the life or physical safety of
any individual.
(ii) Examples of records normally
exempt from disclosure include, but are
not limited to:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53281
(A) The identity and statements of
complainants or witnesses, or other
material developed during the course of
an investigation and all materials
prepared in connection with related
government litigation or adjudicative
proceedings;
(B) The identity of firms or
individuals investigated for alleged
irregularities involving NSF grants,
contracts or other matters when no
indictment has been obtained, no civil
action has been filed against them by
the United States, or no governmentwide public suspension or debarment
has occurred;
(C) Information obtained in
confidence, expressed or implied, in the
course of a criminal investigation by the
NSF Office of the Inspector General.
(iii) The exclusions contained in 5
U.S.C. 552(c)(1) and (2) may also apply
to these records.
(8) Exemption 8–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8).
Records contained in or related to
examination, operating, or condition
reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for
the use of any agency responsible for the
regulation or supervision of financial
institutions.
(9) Exemption 9–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9).
Records containing geological and
geophysical information and data,
including maps, concerning wells.
(b) Deletion of exempt portions and
identifying details. Any reasonably
segregable portion of a record will be
provided to requesters after deletion of
the portions which are exempt.
Whenever any final opinion, order, or
other materials required to be made
available relates to a private party or
parties and the release of the name(s) or
other identifying details will constitute
a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy, the record shall be
published or made available with such
identifying details left blank, or shall be
published or made available with
obviously fictitious substitutes and with
a notification such as the following:
Names of parties and certain other
identifying details have been removed
(and fictitious names substituted) in
order to prevent a clearly unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of the
individuals involved.
§ 612.8
Business information.
(a) In general. Business information
obtained by the Foundation from a
submitter of that information will be
disclosed under the FOIA only under
this section’s procedures.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Business Information means
commercial or financial information
obtained by the Foundation from a
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
53282
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
submitter that may be protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the
FOIA and § 612.7(a)(4).
(2) Submitter means any person or
entity from whom the Foundation
obtains business information, directly or
indirectly. The term includes
corporations; state, local, and tribal
governments; and foreign governments.
(c) Designation of business
information. A submitter of business
information must use good faith efforts
to designate, by appropriate markings,
either at the time of submission or at a
reasonable time thereafter, any portions
of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4. These designations will
expire ten years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter
requests, and provides justification for,
a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. The
Foundation will provide a submitter
with prompt written notice of a FOIA
request or administrative appeal that
seeks its business information wherever
required under this section, in order to
give the submitter an opportunity to
object to disclosure of any specified
portion of that information under
paragraph (f) of this section. The notice
shall either describe the business
information requested or include copies
of the requested records or record
portions containing the information.
(e) Where notice is required. Notice
will be given to a submitter wherever:
(1) The information has been
designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(2) The Foundation has reason to
believe that the information may be
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure.
NSF will allow a submitter a reasonable
time, consistent with statutory
requirements, to respond to the notice
described in paragraph (d) of this
section. If a submitter has any objection
to disclosure, it must submit a detailed
written statement. The statement must
specify all grounds for withholding any
portion of the information under any
exemption of the FOIA and, in the case
of Exemption 4, must show why the
information is a trade secret, or
commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential. In the
event that a submitter fails to respond
within the time specified in the notice,
the submitter will be considered to have
no objection to disclosure of the
information. Information provided by a
submitter under this paragraph may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
itself be a record subject to disclosure
under the FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. The
Foundation will consider a submitter’s
objections and specific grounds for
nondisclosure in deciding whether to
disclose business information.
Whenever it decides to disclose
business information over the objection
of a submitter, the Foundation will give
the submitter written notice, which will
include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why
the submitter’s disclosure objections
were not sustained;
(2) A description of the business
information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which
will be a reasonable time subsequent to
the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements.
The notice requirements of paragraphs
(d) and (g) of this section will not apply
if:
(1) The Foundation determines that
the information should not be disclosed
(the Foundation protects from
disclosure to third parties information
about specific unfunded applications,
including pending, withdrawn, or
declined proposals);
(2) The information lawfully has been
published or has been officially made
available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by statute (other than the
FOIA) or by a regulation issued in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 12600 (3 CFR, 1988
Comp., p. 235); or
(4) The designation made by the
submitter under paragraph (c) of this
section appears obviously frivolous, in
which case the Foundation will, within
a reasonable time prior to a specified
disclosure date, give the submitter
written notice of any final decision to
disclose the information.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever
a requester files a lawsuit seeking to
compel the disclosure of business
information, the Foundation will
promptly notify the submitter(s).
Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit
seeking to prevent the disclosure of
business information, the Foundation
will notify the requester(s).
§ 612.9
Appeals.
(a) Appeals of denials. You may
appeal a denial of your request to the
General Counsel, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You
must make your appeal in writing and
it must be received by the Office of the
General Counsel within ten days of the
receipt of the denial (weekends, legal
holidays, and the date of receipt
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
excluded). You must clearly mark your
appeal letter and the envelope or your
electronic submission as a ‘‘Freedom of
Information Act Appeal.’’ Your appeal
letter must include a copy of your
written request and the denial together
with any written argument you wish to
submit.
(b) Responses to appeals. A written
decision on your appeal will be made by
the General Counsel. A decision
affirming an adverse determination in
whole or in part will contain a
statement of the reason(s) for the
affirmance, including any FOIA
exemption(s) applied, and will inform
you of the FOIA provisions for court
review of the decision. If the adverse
determination is reversed or modified
on appeal, in whole or in part, you will
be notified in a written decision and
your request will be reprocessed in
accordance with that appeal decision.
(c) When appeal is required. If you
wish to seek review by a court of any
denial, you must first appeal it under
this section.
§ 612.10
Fees
(a) In general. NSF will charge for
processing requests under the FOIA in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, except where fees are limited
under paragraph (d) of this section or
where a waiver or reduction of fees is
granted under paragraph (k) of this
section. If fees are applicable, NSF will
itemize the amounts charged. NSF may
collect all applicable fees before sending
copies of requested records to a
requester. Requesters must pay fees by
check or money order made payable to
the Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Commercial use request means a
request from or on behalf of a person
who seeks information for a use or
purpose that furthers his or her
commercial, trade, or profit interests,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. When it
appears that the requester will put the
records to a commercial use, either
because of the nature of the request
itself or because NSF has reasonable
cause to doubt a requester’s stated use,
NSF will provide the requester a
reasonable opportunity to submit
further clarification.
(2) Direct costs means those expenses
that an agency actually incurs in
searching for and duplicating (and, in
the case of commercial use requests,
reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA
request. Direct costs include, for
example, the salary of the employee
performing the work (the basic rate of
pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
that rate to cover benefits) and the cost
of operating duplication machinery. Not
included in direct costs are overhead
expenses such as the costs of space and
heating or lighting of the facility in
which the records are kept.
(3) Duplication means the making of
a copy of a record, or of the information
contained in it, necessary to respond to
a FOIA request. Copies can take the
form of paper, microform, audiovisual
materials, or electronic records (for
example, magnetic tape or compact
disk) among others. NSF will honor a
requester’s specified preference of form
or format of disclosure if the record is
readily reproducible by NSF, with
reasonable effort, in the requested form
or format.
(4) Educational institution means a
preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate
higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution
of vocational education that operates a
program of scholarly research. To be in
this category, a requester must show
that the request is authorized by and
made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are not
sought for a commercial use, but are
sought to further scholarly research.
(5) Noncommercial scientific
institution means an institution that is
not operated on a ‘‘commercial’’ basis,
as that term is defined in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, and that is
operated solely for the purpose of
conducting scientific research, the
results of which are not intended to
promote any particular product or
industry. To be in this category, a
requester must show that the request is
authorized by and made under the
auspices of a qualifying institution and
that the records are not sought for a
commercial use or to promote any
particular product or industry, but are
sought to further scientific research.
(6) Representative of the news media
or news media requester means any
person actively gathering news for an
entity that is organized and operated to
publish or broadcast news to the public.
The term news means information that
is about current events or that would be
of current interest to the public.
Examples of news media entities
include television or radio stations
broadcasting to the public at large and
publishers of periodicals (but only in
those instances where they can qualify
as disseminators of ‘‘news’’) who make
their products available for purchase or
subscription by the general public. For
‘‘freelance’’ journalists to be regarded as
working for a news organization, they
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
must demonstrate a solid basis for
expecting publication through that
organization. A publication contract
would be the clearest proof, but NSF
shall also look to the past publication
record of a requester in making this
determination. To be in this category, a
requester must not be seeking the
requested records for a commercial use.
However, a request for records
supporting the news dissemination
function of the requester will not be
considered to be for a commercial use.
(7) Review means the examination of
a record located in response to a request
in order to determine whether any
portion of it is exempt from disclosure.
It also includes processing any record
for disclosure, for example, doing all
that is necessary to redact it and prepare
it for disclosure. Review costs are
recoverable even if a record ultimately
is not disclosed. Review time includes
time spent considering any formal
objection to disclosure made by a
business submitter under § 612.8, but
does not include time spent resolving
general legal or policy issues regarding
the application of exemptions.
(8) Search means the process of
looking for and retrieving records or
information responsive to a request. It
includes page by page or line by line
identification of information within
records and also includes reasonable
efforts to locate and retrieve information
from records maintained in paper or
electronic form or format, or stored in
Federal Records Centers. NSF will
ensure that searches are done in the
most efficient and least expensive
manner reasonably possible. For
example, NSF will not search line by
line where duplicating an entire
document would be quicker and less
expensive.
(c) Fees. In responding to FOIA
requests, NSF will charge the following
fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees
has been granted under paragraph (k) of
this section:
(1) Search. (i) Search fees will be
charged for all requests, other than
requests made by educational
institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the
news media, subject to the limitations of
paragraph (d) of this section. NSF may
charge for time spent searching even if
responsive records are not located or are
withheld entirely as exempt from
disclosure.
(ii) Manual searches for records.
Whenever feasible, NSF will charge at
the salary rate(s) (i.e., basic pay plus 16
percent) of the employee(s) conducting
the search. Where a homogeneous class
of personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all
administrative/clerical or all
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53283
professional/executive), NSF has
established an average rate for the range
of grades typically involved. Routine
search for records by administrative
personnel are charged at $5.50 for each
quarter hour. When a non-routine, nonclerical search by professional
personnel is conducted (for example,
where the task of determining which
records fall within a request requires
professional time) the charge is $11.50
for each quarter hour.
(iii) Computer searches of records.
NSF will charge at the actual direct cost
of conducting the search. This will
include the cost of operating the
computer system(s) for that portion of
operating time that is directly
attributable to searching for records
responsive to a FOIA request and
operator/programmer salary (i.e., basic
pay plus 16 percent) apportionable to
the search. When NSF can establish a
reasonable agency-wide average rate for
computer operating costs and operator/
programmer salaries involved in FOIA
searches, the Foundation will do so and
charge accordingly.
(iv) Archived records. For requests
that require the retrieval of records
stored by NSF at a Federal records
center operated by the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA), additional costs will be
charged in accordance with the
Transactional Billing Rate Schedule
established by NARA.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will
be charged to all requesters, subject to
the limitations of paragraph (d) of this
section. For a paper photocopy of a
record (no more than one copy of which
need be supplied), the fee will be ten
cents per page. For copies produced by
computer, such as print outs, tapes,
compact disks, or other electronic
media, NSF will charge the direct costs,
including operator time, of producing
the copy. Where paper documents must
be scanned in order to comply with a
requester’s preference to receive the
records in an electronic format, the
requester shall pay the direct costs
associated with scanning those
materials. For other forms of
duplication, NSF will charge the direct
costs of that duplication.
(3) Review. Review fees will be
charged to requesters who make a
commercial use request. Review fees
will be charged only for the initial
record review, in other words, the
review done when NSF determines
whether an exemption applies to a
particular record or record portion at the
initial request level. NSF may charge for
review even if a record ultimately is not
disclosed. No charge will be made for
review at the administrative appeal
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
53284
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
level for an exemption already applied.
However, records or record portions
withheld under an exemption that is
subsequently determined not to apply
may be reviewed again to determine
whether any other exemption not
previously considered applies; the costs
of that review are chargeable where it is
made necessary by a change of
circumstances. Review fees will be
charged at the salary rate (basic pay plus
16%) of the employee(s) performing the
review.
(d) Limitations on charging fees. (1)
No search fee will be charged for
requests by educational institutions,
noncommercial scientific institutions,
or representatives of the news media. (2)
Except for requesters seeking records for
a commercial use, NSF will provide
without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication
(or the cost equivalent); and
(ii) The first two hours of search (or
the cost equivalent).
(3) Whenever a total fee calculated
under paragraph (c) of this section is
$25.00 or less for any request, no fee
will be charged.
(4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(2)
and (3) of this section work together.
This means that noncommercial
requesters will be charged no fees
unless the cost of search in excess of
two hours plus the cost of duplication
in excess of 100 pages totals more than
$25.00. Commercial requesters will not
be charged unless the costs of search,
review, and duplication total more than
$25.00.
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess
of $25.00. When NSF determines or
estimates that the fees to be charged
under this section will exceed $25.00, it
will notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount of the fees, unless the
requester has indicated a willingness to
pay fees as high as those anticipated. If
only a portion of the fee can be
estimated readily, NSF will advise the
requester that the estimated fee may be
only a portion of the total fee. In cases
in which a requester has been notified
that actual or estimated fees exceed
$25.00, the request will not be
considered perfected and further work
will not be done until the requester
agrees to pay the anticipated total fee.
Any such agreement should be
memorialized in writing. A notice under
this paragraph will offer the requester
an opportunity to discuss the matter
with Foundation personnel in order to
reformulate the request to meet the
requester’s needs at a lower cost, if
possible. If a requester fails to respond
within 60 days of notice of actual or
estimated fees with an agreement to pay
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
those fees, NSF may administratively
close the request.
(f) Charges for other services. Apart
from the other provisions of this section,
when NSF chooses as a matter of
administrative discretion to provide a
requested special service such as
certifying that records are true copies or
sending them by other than ordinary
mail, the direct costs of providing the
service will be charged to the requester.
(g) Charging interest. NSF may charge
interest on any unpaid bill starting on
the 31st day following the date of billing
the requester. Interest charges will be
assessed at the rate provided in 31
U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the
date of the billing until payment is
received by NSF. NSF may follow the
provisions of the Debt Collection Act of
1982 (Pub. L. 97–365, 96 Stat. 1749), as
amended, and its administrative
procedures, including the use of
consumer reporting agencies, collection
agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. Where NSF
reasonably believes that a requester or a
group of requesters acting together is
attempting to divide a request into a
series of requests for the purpose of
avoiding fees, the agency may aggregate
those requests and charge accordingly.
NSF may presume that multiple
requests of this type made within a 30day period have been made in order to
avoid fees. Where requests are separated
by a longer period, NSF will aggregate
them only where there exists a solid
basis for determining that aggregation is
warranted under all the circumstances
involved. Multiple requests involving
unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For
requests other than those described in
paragraphs (i) (2) and (3) of this section,
NSF will not require the requester to
make an advance payment, -in other
words, a payment made before work is
begun or continued on a request.
Payment owed for work already
completed (i.e., a prepayment before
copies are sent to a requester) is not an
advance payment.
(2) Where NSF determines or
estimates that a total fee to be charged
under this section will be more than
$250.00, it may require the requester to
make an advance payment of an amount
up to the amount of the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to
process the request, except where it
receives a satisfactory assurance of full
payment from a requester that has a
history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously
failed to pay a properly charged fee to
any agency within 30 days of the date
of billing, NSF may require the
requester to pay the full amount due,
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
plus any applicable interest, and to
make an advance payment of the full
amount of any anticipated fee, before
NSF begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request
from that requester.
(4) In cases in which NSF requires
advance payment or payment due under
paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the
request will not be considered perfected
and further work will not be done on it
until the required payment is received.
(j) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any statute that
specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of
records. Where records responsive to
requests are maintained for distribution
by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, NSF will
inform requesters of the steps for
obtaining records from those sources so
that they may do so most economically.
(k) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1)
Records responsive to a request will be
furnished without charge or at a charge
reduced below that established under
paragraph (c) of this section where NSF
determines, based on all available
information, that disclosure of the
requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the first fee
waiver requirement is met, NSF will
consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether
the subject of the requested records
concerns ‘‘the operations or activities of
the government.’’ The subject of the
requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the
information to be disclosed: Whether
disclosure is ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
understanding of government operations
or activities. The disclosable portions of
the requested records must be
meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities in
order to be ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
increased public understanding of those
operations or activities. Disclosure of
information already in the public
domain, in either duplicative or
substantially identical form, is unlikely
to contribute to such understanding
where nothing new would be added to
the public’s understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an
understanding of the subject by the
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
public likely to result from disclosure:
Whether disclosure of the requested
information will contribute to ‘‘public
understanding.’’ The disclosure must
contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons
interested in the subject as opposed to
the individual understanding of the
requester. A requester’s expertise in the
subject area and ability and intention to
effectively convey information to the
public will be considered. A
representative of the news media as
defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this
section will normally be presumed to
satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the
contribution to public understanding:
Whether disclosure is likely to
contribute ‘‘significantly’’ to public
understanding of government operations
or activities. The public’s understanding
of the subject in question must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a
significant extent as compared to the
level of public understanding existing
prior to the disclosure. NSF will make
no value judgments about whether
information that would contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government is ‘‘important’’ enough to be
made public.
(3) To determine whether the second
fee waiver requirement is met, NSF will
consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a
commercial interest: Whether the
requester has a commercial interest that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. NSF will consider any
commercial interest of the requester
(with reference to the definition of
‘‘commercial use’’ in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section), or of any person on whose
behalf the requester may be acting, that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters will be given an
opportunity in the administrative
process to provide explanatory
information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure:
Whether any identified commercial
interest of the requester is sufficiently
large, in comparison with the public
interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
‘‘primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester.’’ A fee waiver or
reduction is justified where the public
interest standard is satisfied and that
public interest is greater in magnitude
than that of any identified commercial
interest in disclosure. NSF ordinarily
will presume that where a news media
requester has satisfied the public
interest standard, the public interest
will be the interest primarily served by
disclosure to that requester. Disclosure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
to data brokers or others who merely
compile and market government
information for direct economic return
will not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(4) Where only some of the requested
records satisfy the requirements for a
waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted
for those records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or
reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3)
of this section, insofar as they apply to
each request.
§ 612.11
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this part will be construed
to entitle any person, as of right, to any
service or to the disclosure of any record
to which such person is not entitled
under the FOIA.
Dated: August 23, 2013.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
53285
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0363 in the ‘‘Search’’ box,
and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. William Abernathy, Vessel
and Facility Operating Standards
Division (CG–OES–2), Coast Guard;
telephone 202–372–1363, email
William.J.Abernathy@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
[FR Doc. 2013–21053 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and
188
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0363]
I. Abbreviations
II. Discussion
III. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
RIN 1625–AC03 (formerly RIN 1625–AB71)
I. Abbreviations
Seagoing Barges
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is revising
several vessel inspection and
certification regulations to align them
with a statutory definition of ‘‘seagoing
barge’’ and with a statutory exemption
from inspection and certification
requirements for certain seagoing
barges. The revisions are intended to
eliminate ambiguity in existing
regulations, to reduce the potential for
confusion among the regulated public,
and to help the Coast Guard perform its
maritime safety and stewardship
missions.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective
September 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2011–0363 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DFR Direct final rule
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Discussion
The legal basis for this final rule is 46
U.S.C. 3306, which requires the
Secretary of Homeland Security to
prescribe regulations for Coast Guardinspected vessels, and Executive Order
(E.O.) 12988, Civil Justice Reform,
section 3(a), which obligates Federal
agencies to eliminate ambiguity in
existing regulations. The Secretary’s
authority under 46 U.S.C. 3306 is
delegated to the Coast Guard in
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1 paragraph (92.b).
The purpose of this final rule is to
finalize revisions that are intended to
align Coast Guard regulations with
current statutory language, thereby
eliminating ambiguity that could cause
confusion among the regulated public.
That ambiguity arose as the result of two
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53277-53285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21053]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 612
RIN 3145-AA56
Availability of Records and Information
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document sets forth revisions of the Foundation's
regulations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The revisions
implement the provision of the Open FOIA Act of 2009 which amended
Exemption 3, update procedural provisions, and allow for multi-track
processing of requests.
DATES: The final rule will be effective September 30, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Matthew Powell, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation,
telephone 703-292-8060 or email mpowell@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 14, 2013 the National Science
Foundation (NSF) published a proposed rule at 78 FR 28173 requesting
public comment on proposed revisions to its existing FOIA regulations
at 45 CFR part 612. No comments were received. Accordingly, NSF is
revising its FOIA regulations by adopting the revisions as proposed.
This revision of Part 612 implements the provision of the Open FOIA Act
of 2009 which amends Exemption 3. It also updates and clarifies several
procedural provisions concerning FOIA administration, reflects changes
in case law, and includes revised current cost figures for calculating
and charging fees. The duplication fee will be reduced. In addition,
the Foundation will implement multi-track processing. Clarifications
and procedural changes are found at Sec. 612.1(b) (General
Provisions); Sec. 612.3(b) and (f) (Requirements for making requests);
Sec. 612.5(a), (b), (c) and (d)(3) (Timing of responses to requests);
Sec. 612.6(a) (Responses to requests); Sec. 612.7(a)(2), (3) and
(5)(iii) (Exemptions); and Sec. 612.10(b)(3), and (c)(1) and (2)
(Fees).
For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the
revised rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities; the rule addresses the procedures
to be followed when submitting or responding to requests for records
under the Freedom of Information Act. For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) the revised rule would not
significantly or uniquely affect small
[[Page 53278]]
governments and would not result in increased expenditures by State,
local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more. For purposes of Executive Order 12866, the revised
rule is not a significant regulatory action requiring review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) it has been determined that this
rulemaking does not impose any reporting or recordkeeping requirement
on the public. This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (as
amended), 5 U.S.C. 804, and will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 612
Administrative practice and procedure; Freedom of information.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Science
Foundation amends 45 CFR Chapter VI by revising Part 612 as follows:
PART 612--AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
Sec.
612.1 General provisions.
612.2 Public reading room.
612.3 Requirements for making requests.
612.4 Responding to requests.
612.5 Timing of responses to requests.
612.6 Responses to requests.
612.7 Exemptions.
612.8 Business information.
612.9 Appeals.
612.10 Fees.
612.11 Other rights and services.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.
Sec. 612.1 General provisions.
(a) This part contains the rules that the National Science
Foundation (NSF) follows in processing requests for records under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. Information routinely
made available to the public as part of a regular Foundation activity
(for example, program announcements and solicitations, summary of
awarded proposals, statistical reports on U.S. science, press releases
issued by the Office of Legislative and Public Affairs) may be provided
to the public without reliance on this part. As a matter of policy, the
Foundation also makes discretionary disclosures of records or
information otherwise exempt under the FOIA whenever disclosure would
not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption. This
policy, however, does not create any right enforceable in court. When
individuals seek records about themselves under the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, NSF processes those requests under both NSF's
Privacy regulations at part 613 of this chapter, and this part.
(b) As used in this part, NSF includes one component, the Office of
the Inspector General (OIG) of the National Science Foundation.
Sec. 612.2 Public reading room.
(a) The Foundation maintains a public reading room located in the
NSF Library at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 225, Arlington, Virginia,
open during regular working hours Monday through Friday. It contains
the records that the FOIA requires to be made regularly available for
public inspection and copying and has computers and printers available
for public use in accessing records. Also available for public
inspection and copying are current subject matter indexes of reading
room records.
(b) Information about FOIA and Privacy at NSF and copies of
frequently requested FOIA releases are available online at www.nsf.gov/policies/foia/jsp. Most NSF policy documents, staff instructions,
manuals, and other publications that affect a member of the public, are
available in electronic form through the ``Publications'' option on the
tool bar on NSF's Home Page on the World Wide Web at www.nsf.gov.
Sec. 612.3 Requirements for making requests.
(a) Where to send a request. You may make a FOIA request for
records of the National Science Foundation by writing directly to the
NSF FOIA Officer, Office of the General Counsel, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230.
Requests may also be sent by facsimile to (703) 292-9041 or by email to
foia@nsf.gov.
The National Science Foundation includes one agency component, the
NSF Office of the Inspector General (OIG). For records maintained by
the NSF OIG, you may write directly to the Office of Inspector General,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1135,
Arlington, VA 22230. Requests may also be sent to the OIG by facsimile
to (703) 292-9158. The NSF FOIA Officer and the OIG component will also
forward requests as appropriate.
(b) Form of request. A FOIA request need not be in any particular
format, but it must be in writing, include the requester's name and
mailing address, and be clearly identified both on the envelope and in
the letter, or in a facsimile or electronic mail message as a Freedom
of Information Act or ``FOIA'' request. It must describe the records
sought with sufficient specificity to permit identification, and
include agreement to pay applicable fees as described in Sec. 612.10.
NSF and its OIG component are not obligated to act upon a request until
it meets these procedural requirements.
(c) Personal records. (1) If you are making a request for records
about yourself and the records are not contained in a Privacy Act
system of records, your request will be processed only under the FOIA,
since the Privacy Act does not apply. If the records about you are
contained in a Privacy Act system of records, NSF will respond with
information on how to make a Privacy Act request (see NSF Privacy Act
regulations at 45 CFR 613.2).
(2) If you are making a request for personal information about
another individual, either a written authorization signed by that
individual in accordance with Sec. 613.2(f) of this chapter permitting
disclosure of those records to you, or proof that that individual is
deceased (for example, a copy of a death certificate or a published
obituary) will help the agency process your request.
(d) Description of records sought. Your request must describe the
records that you seek in enough detail to enable NSF personnel to
locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. A record must have been
created or obtained by NSF and be under the control of NSF at the time
of the request to be subject to the FOIA. NSF has no obligation under
the FOIA to create, compile, or obtain a record to satisfy a FOIA
request. Whenever possible, your request should include specific
descriptive information about each record sought, such as the date,
title or name, author, recipient, and subject matter of the record. As
a general rule, the more specific you are about the records or type of
records that you want, the more likely the Foundation will be able to
locate those records in response to your request, and the more likely
fees will be reduced or eliminated. If NSF determines that your request
does not reasonably describe records, you will be advised what
additional information is needed to perfect your request or why your
request is otherwise insufficient.
(e) Agreement to pay fees. Your request must state that you will
promptly pay the total fees chargeable under this regulation or set a
maximum
[[Page 53279]]
amount you are willing to pay. NSF does not charge if fees total less
than $25.00. If you seek a waiver of fees, please see Sec. 612.10(k)
for a discussion of the factors you must address. If you place an
inadequate limit on the amount you will pay, or have failed to make
payments for previous requests, NSF may require advance payment (see
Sec. 612.10(i)).
(f) Receipt date. A request that meets the requirements of this
section will be considered received on the date it is properly received
by the Office of the General Counsel or the Office of the Inspector
General. In determining which records are responsive to a FOIA request,
the NSF will include only records in its possession as of the date the
NSF or OIG begins its search. If any other date is used, the NSF or OIG
shall inform the requester of that date.
(g) Publications excluded. For the purpose of public requests for
records the term ``record'' does not include publications which are
available to the public in the Federal Register, or by sale or free
distribution. Such publications may be obtained from the Government
Printing Office, the National Technical Information Service, or through
NSF's Home Page on the World Wide Web at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/. Requests for such publications will be referred to or
the requester informed of the appropriate source.
Sec. 612.4 Processing requests.
(a) Monitoring of requests. The NSF Office of the General Counsel
(OGC), or such other office as may be designated by the Director, will
serve as the central office for administering these regulations. For
records maintained by the Office of Inspector General, that Office will
control incoming requests made directly or referred to it, dispatch
response letters, and maintain administrative records. For all other
records maintained by NSF, OGC (or such other office as may be
designated by the Director) will control incoming requests, assign them
to appropriate action offices, monitor compliance, consult with action
offices on disclosure, approve necessary extensions, dispatch denial
and other letters, and maintain administrative records.
(b) Consultations and referrals. When the NSF receives a request
for a record in its possession that originated with another agency or
in which another agency has a substantial interest, it may decide that
the other agency of the Federal Government is better able to determine
whether the record should or should not be released under the FOIA.
(1) If the NSF determines that it is the agency best able to
process the record in response to the request, then it will do so,
after consultation with the other interested agencies where
appropriate.
(2) If it determines that it is not the agency best able to process
the record, then it will refer the request regarding that record (or
portion of the record) to the agency that originated or has a
substantial interest in the record in question (but only if that agency
is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the agency that originated a
record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to
disclose it.
(3) Whenever NSF refers all or any part of the responsibility for
responding to a request to another agency, it ordinarily will notify
the requester of the referral and inform the requester of the name of
each agency to which the request has been referred and of the part of
the request that has been referred, unless such notification would
disclose information otherwise exempt.
Sec. 612.5 Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. The NSF and its component, OIG, ordinarily will
initiate processing of requests according to their order of receipt.
(b) Multitrack processing. (1) NSF and OIG may use two or more
processing tracks by distinguishing between simple and more complex
requests based on the amount of work and/or time needed to process the
request, including through limits based on the number of pages
involved. If NSF or OIG does so, it shall advise requesters in its
slower track(s) of the limits of its faster track(s).
(2) NSF or OIG using multitrack processing may provide requesters
in its slower track(s) with an opportunity to limit the scope of their
requests in order to qualify for faster processing within the specified
limits of the NSF's or OIG's faster track(s). The requester may be
contacted by telephone, email, or letter, whichever is more efficient
in each case.
(c) Time for response. The NSF will seek to take appropriate action
within 20 days of when a request is properly received or is perfected
(excluding the date of receipt, weekends, and legal holidays),
whichever is later. A request which otherwise meets the requirements of
Sec. 612.3 is perfected when you have reasonably described the records
sought under Sec. 612.3(d), and agreed to pay fees under Sec.
612.3(e), or otherwise met the fee requirements under Sec. 612.10.
(d) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where the time limits for processing
a request cannot be met because of unusual circumstances, as defined in
the FOIA, the NSF FOIA Officer or the OIG component will notify the
requester as soon as practicable in writing of the unusual
circumstances and may extend the response period for up to ten working
days.
(2) Where the extension is for more than ten working days, the FOIA
Officer or the OIG component will provide the requester with an
opportunity either to modify the request so that it may be processed
within the ten day extension period or to arrange an agreed upon
alternative time period with the FOIA Officer or the OIG component for
processing the request or a modified request.
(3) Where the NSF reasonably believes that multiple requests
submitted by a requester, or by a group of requesters acting in
concert, constitute a single request that would otherwise involve
unusual circumstances, and the requests involve clearly related
matters, they may be aggregated. Multiple requests involving unrelated
matters will not be aggregated.
(e) Expedited processing. (1) If you want to receive expedited
processing, you must submit a statement, certified to be true and
correct to the best of your knowledge and belief, explaining in detail
the basis for requesting expedited processing.
(2)(i) Requests and appeals will be given expedited treatment
whenever it is determined that a requester has demonstrated compelling
need by presenting:
(A) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual; or
(B) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
Federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in
disseminating information.
(ii) For example, a requester who is not a full-time member of the
news media must establish that he or she is a person whose main
professional activity or occupation is information dissemination,
though it need not be his or her sole occupation. Such requester also
must establish a particular urgency to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the request, beyond the public's right
to know about government activity generally, and that the information
sought has particular value that would be lost if not disseminated
quickly.
(3) Within ten calendar days of receipt of a request for expedited
processing, the NSF FOIA Officer or OIG component will decide whether
to grant it, and will notify the requester of the decision orally or in
writing. If a request
[[Page 53280]]
for expedited treatment is granted, the request will be processed as
soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing is denied,
any appeal of that decision will be acted on expeditiously.
Sec. 612.6 Responses to requests.
(a) Acknowledgment of requests. The NSF or OIG will ordinarily send
an email acknowledgment of all FOIA requests with an assigned request
number for further reference and an estimated response date.
(b) Grants of requests. Once the NSF makes a determination to grant
a request in whole or in part, it will notify the requester in writing.
The NSF will inform the requester in the notice of any applicable fee
and will disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of
applicable fees. Records disclosed in part will be marked or annotated
to show both the amount and the location of the information deleted
where practicable.
(c) Denials of requests. (1) Denials of FOIA requests will be made
by the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of the Inspector
General, or such other office as may be designated by the Director. The
response letter will briefly set forth the reasons for the denial,
including any FOIA exemption(s) applied in denying the request. It will
also provide the name and title or position of the person responsible
for the denial, will inform the requester of the right to appeal, and
will, where appropriate, include an estimate of the volume of any
requested materials withheld. An estimate need not be provided when the
volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in
part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by
an applicable exemption.
(2) Requesters can appeal an agency determination to withhold all
or part of any requested record; a determination that a requested
record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that what
has been requested is not a record subject to the Act; a disapproval of
a fee category claim by a requester; denial of a fee waiver or
reduction; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment (see Sec.
612.9).
Sec. 612.7 Exemptions.
(a) Exemptions from disclosure. The following types of records or
information may be withholdable as exempt in full or in part from
mandatory public disclosure:
(1) Exemption 1--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1). Records specifically
authorized and properly classified pursuant to Executive Order to be
kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy. NSF
does not have classifying authority and normally does not deal with
classified materials.
(2) Exemption 2--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2). Records related solely to the
internal personnel rules and practices of NSF. Examples of records
normally exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to:
Information relating to position management and manpower utilization,
such as internal staffing plans, authorizations or controls, or
involved in determination of the qualifications of candidates for
employment, advancement, or promotion including examination questions
and answers.
(3) Exemption 3--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Records specifically exempted
from disclosure by another statute that either requires that the
information be withheld in a such way that the agency has no discretion
in the matter; or establishes particular criteria for withholding or
refers to particular types of information to be withheld; and, if
enacted after the date of enactment of the OPEN FOIA Act of 2009,
October 28, 2009, specifically cites to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Examples of
records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to:
(i) Records that disclose any invention in which the Federal
Government owns or may own a right, title, or interest (including a
nonexclusive license), 35 U.S.C. 205;
(ii) Contractor proposals not specifically set forth or
incorporated by reference into a contract, 41 U.S.C. 253b(m);
(iii) Information protected by the Procurement Integrity Act, 41
U.S.C. 423;
(iv) Statistical information protected by section 14(i) of the NSF
Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1873(i) and/or the Confidential
Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002, 44
U.S.C. 3501 note.
(4) Exemption 4--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). Trade secrets and commercial
or financial information obtained from a person, and privileged or
confidential. Information subject to this exemption is that customarily
held in confidence by the originator(s), including nonprofit
organizations and their employees. Release of such information is
likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the
originator or submitter, or impair the Foundation's ability to obtain
such information in the future. NSF will process information
potentially exempted from disclosure by Exemption 4 under Sec. 612.8.
Examples of records or information normally exempt from disclosure
include, but are not limited to:
(i) Information received in confidence, such as grant applications,
fellowship applications, and research proposals prior to award;
(ii) Confidential scientific and manufacturing processes or
developments, and technical, scientific, statistical data or other
information developed by a grantee;
(iii) Technical, scientific, or statistical data, and commercial or
financial information privileged or received in confidence from an
existing or potential contractor or subcontractor, in connection with
bids, proposals, or contracts, concerning contract performance, income,
profits, losses, and expenditures, as well as trade secrets,
inventions, discoveries, or other proprietary data. When the provisions
of 41 U.S.C. 253b(m) or 41 U.S.C. 423 are met, certain proprietary and
source selection information may also be withheld under Exemption 3;
(iv) Confidential proprietary information submitted on a voluntary
basis;
(v) Statements or information collected in the course of
inspections, investigations, or audits, when such statements are
received in confidence from the individual and retained in confidence
because they reveal trade secrets or commercial or financial
information normally considered confidential or privileged.
(5) Exemption 5-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5). Inter-agency or intra-agency
memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a private
party in litigation with NSF. Factual material contained in such
records will be considered for release if it can be reasonably
segregated and is not otherwise exempt. Examples of records exempt from
disclosure include, but are not limited to:
(i) Those portions of reports, memoranda, correspondence,
workpapers, minutes of meetings, and staff papers, containing
evaluations, advice, opinions, suggestions, or other deliberative
material that are prepared for use within NSF or within the Executive
Branch of the Government by agency personnel and others acting in a
consultant or advisory capacity;
(ii) Advance information on proposed NSF plans to procure, lease,
or otherwise acquire, or dispose of materials, real estate, facilities,
services or functions, when such information would provide undue or
unfair competitive advantage to private interests or impede legitimate
government functions;
(iii) Negotiating positions or limits at least until the execution
of a contract (including a grant or cooperative agreement) or the
completion of the
[[Page 53281]]
action to which the negotiating positions were applicable. They may
also be exempt pursuant to other provisions of this section;
(iv) Trade secret or other confidential research development, or
commercial information owned by the Government, where premature release
is likely to affect the Government's negotiating position or other
commercial interest;
(iv) Records prepared for use in proceedings before any Federal or
State court or administrative body;
(vi) Evaluations of and comments on specific grant applications,
research projects or proposals, fellowship applications or nominations
or other individual awards, or potential contractors and their
products, whether made by NSF personnel or by external reviewers acting
either individually or in panels, committees or similar groups;
(vii) Preliminary, draft or unapproved documents, such as opinions,
recommendations, evaluations, decisions, or studies conducted or
supported by NSF;
(viii) Proposed budget requests, and supporting projections used or
arising in the preparation and/or execution of a budget; proposed
annual and multi-year policy, priorities, program and financial plan
and supporting papers;
(ix) Those portions of official reports of inspection, reports of
the Inspector General, audits, investigations, or surveys pertaining to
safety, security, or the internal management, administration, or
operation of NSF, when these records have traditionally been treated by
the courts as privileged against disclosure in litigation.
(6) Exemption 6-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). Personnel and medical files and
similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The exemption may apply to
protect the privacy of living persons and of living close survivors of
a deceased person identified in a record. Information in such files
which is not otherwise exempt from disclosure pursuant to other
provisions of this section will be released to the subject or to his
designated legal representative, and may be disclosed to others with
the subject's written consent. Examples of records exempt from
disclosure include, but are not limited to:
(i) Reports, records, and other materials pertaining to individual
cases in which disciplinary or other administrative action has been or
may be taken. Opinions and orders resulting from those administrative
or disciplinary proceedings shall be disclosed without identifying
details if used, cited, or relied upon as precedent;
(ii) Records compiled to evaluate or adjudicate the suitability of
candidates for employment, and the eligibility of individuals (civilian
or contractor employees) for security clearances, or for access to
classified information;
(iii) Reports and evaluations which reflect upon the qualifications
or competence of individuals;
(iv) Personal information such as home addresses and telephone and
facsimile numbers, private email addresses, social security numbers,
dates of birth, marital status and the like;
(v) The exemption also applies when the fact of the existence or
nonexistence of a responsive record would itself reveal personal,
private information, and the public interest in disclosure is not
sufficient to outweigh the privacy interest.
(7) Exemption 7-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7). Records or information compiled
for civil or criminal law enforcement purposes, including the
implementation of Executive Orders or regulations issued pursuant to
law. This exemption may exempt from mandatory disclosure records not
originally created, but later gathered, for law enforcement purposes.
(i) This exemption applies only to the extent that the production
of such law enforcement records or information:
(A) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement
proceedings;
(B) Would deprive a person of the right to a fair trial or an
impartial adjudication;
(C) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy of a living person, or living close
survivors of a deceased person identified in a record;
(D) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a
confidential source, including a source within the Federal Government,
or a State, local, or foreign agency or authority, or any private
institution, that furnished information on a confidential basis; and
information furnished by a confidential source and obtained by a
criminal law enforcement authority in a criminal investigation;
(E) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law
enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could
reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or
(F) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical
safety of any individual.
(ii) Examples of records normally exempt from disclosure include,
but are not limited to:
(A) The identity and statements of complainants or witnesses, or
other material developed during the course of an investigation and all
materials prepared in connection with related government litigation or
adjudicative proceedings;
(B) The identity of firms or individuals investigated for alleged
irregularities involving NSF grants, contracts or other matters when no
indictment has been obtained, no civil action has been filed against
them by the United States, or no government-wide public suspension or
debarment has occurred;
(C) Information obtained in confidence, expressed or implied, in
the course of a criminal investigation by the NSF Office of the
Inspector General.
(iii) The exclusions contained in 5 U.S.C. 552(c)(1) and (2) may
also apply to these records.
(8) Exemption 8-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8). Records contained in or related
to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf
of, or for the use of any agency responsible for the regulation or
supervision of financial institutions.
(9) Exemption 9-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9). Records containing geological
and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
(b) Deletion of exempt portions and identifying details. Any
reasonably segregable portion of a record will be provided to
requesters after deletion of the portions which are exempt. Whenever
any final opinion, order, or other materials required to be made
available relates to a private party or parties and the release of the
name(s) or other identifying details will constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the record shall be published
or made available with such identifying details left blank, or shall be
published or made available with obviously fictitious substitutes and
with a notification such as the following: Names of parties and certain
other identifying details have been removed (and fictitious names
substituted) in order to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of the
personal privacy of the individuals involved.
Sec. 612.8 Business information.
(a) In general. Business information obtained by the Foundation
from a submitter of that information will be disclosed under the FOIA
only under this section's procedures.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Business Information means commercial or financial information
obtained by the Foundation from a
[[Page 53282]]
submitter that may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of
the FOIA and Sec. 612.7(a)(4).
(2) Submitter means any person or entity from whom the Foundation
obtains business information, directly or indirectly. The term includes
corporations; state, local, and tribal governments; and foreign
governments.
(c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business
information must use good faith efforts to designate, by appropriate
markings, either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time
thereafter, any portions of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. These designations will
expire ten years after the date of the submission unless the submitter
requests, and provides justification for, a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. The Foundation will provide a submitter
with prompt written notice of a FOIA request or administrative appeal
that seeks its business information wherever required under this
section, in order to give the submitter an opportunity to object to
disclosure of any specified portion of that information under paragraph
(f) of this section. The notice shall either describe the business
information requested or include copies of the requested records or
record portions containing the information.
(e) Where notice is required. Notice will be given to a submitter
wherever:
(1) The information has been designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(2) The Foundation has reason to believe that the information may
be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure. NSF will allow a submitter
a reasonable time, consistent with statutory requirements, to respond
to the notice described in paragraph (d) of this section. If a
submitter has any objection to disclosure, it must submit a detailed
written statement. The statement must specify all grounds for
withholding any portion of the information under any exemption of the
FOIA and, in the case of Exemption 4, must show why the information is
a trade secret, or commercial or financial information that is
privileged or confidential. In the event that a submitter fails to
respond within the time specified in the notice, the submitter will be
considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information.
Information provided by a submitter under this paragraph may itself be
a record subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. The Foundation will consider a
submitter's objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in
deciding whether to disclose business information. Whenever it decides
to disclose business information over the objection of a submitter, the
Foundation will give the submitter written notice, which will include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why the submitter's disclosure
objections were not sustained;
(2) A description of the business information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which will be a reasonable time
subsequent to the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of
paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section will not apply if:
(1) The Foundation determines that the information should not be
disclosed (the Foundation protects from disclosure to third parties
information about specific unfunded applications, including pending,
withdrawn, or declined proposals);
(2) The information lawfully has been published or has been
officially made available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other
than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12600 (3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 235); or
(4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of
this section appears obviously frivolous, in which case the Foundation
will, within a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure date,
give the submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the
information.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of business information, the
Foundation will promptly notify the submitter(s). Whenever a submitter
files a lawsuit seeking to prevent the disclosure of business
information, the Foundation will notify the requester(s).
Sec. 612.9 Appeals.
(a) Appeals of denials. You may appeal a denial of your request to
the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You must make your appeal
in writing and it must be received by the Office of the General Counsel
within ten days of the receipt of the denial (weekends, legal holidays,
and the date of receipt excluded). You must clearly mark your appeal
letter and the envelope or your electronic submission as a ``Freedom of
Information Act Appeal.'' Your appeal letter must include a copy of
your written request and the denial together with any written argument
you wish to submit.
(b) Responses to appeals. A written decision on your appeal will be
made by the General Counsel. A decision affirming an adverse
determination in whole or in part will contain a statement of the
reason(s) for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied,
and will inform you of the FOIA provisions for court review of the
decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on
appeal, in whole or in part, you will be notified in a written decision
and your request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal
decision.
(c) When appeal is required. If you wish to seek review by a court
of any denial, you must first appeal it under this section.
Sec. 612.10 Fees
(a) In general. NSF will charge for processing requests under the
FOIA in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, except where
fees are limited under paragraph (d) of this section or where a waiver
or reduction of fees is granted under paragraph (k) of this section. If
fees are applicable, NSF will itemize the amounts charged. NSF may
collect all applicable fees before sending copies of requested records
to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check or money order made
payable to the Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Commercial use request means a request from or on behalf of a
person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers his or
her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can include
furthering those interests through litigation. When it appears that the
requester will put the records to a commercial use, either because of
the nature of the request itself or because NSF has reasonable cause to
doubt a requester's stated use, NSF will provide the requester a
reasonable opportunity to submit further clarification.
(2) Direct costs means those expenses that an agency actually
incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial
use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct
costs include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the
work (the basic rate of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of
[[Page 53283]]
that rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating duplication
machinery. Not included in direct costs are overhead expenses such as
the costs of space and heating or lighting of the facility in which the
records are kept.
(3) Duplication means the making of a copy of a record, or of the
information contained in it, necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Copies can take the form of paper, microform, audiovisual materials, or
electronic records (for example, magnetic tape or compact disk) among
others. NSF will honor a requester's specified preference of form or
format of disclosure if the record is readily reproducible by NSF, with
reasonable effort, in the requested form or format.
(4) Educational institution means a preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate higher education, an institution
of professional education, or an institution of vocational education
that operates a program of scholarly research. To be in this category,
a requester must show that the request is authorized by and made under
the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the records are not
sought for a commercial use, but are sought to further scholarly
research.
(5) Noncommercial scientific institution means an institution that
is not operated on a ``commercial'' basis, as that term is defined in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that is operated solely for the
purpose of conducting scientific research, the results of which are not
intended to promote any particular product or industry. To be in this
category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by and
made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the
records are not sought for a commercial use or to promote any
particular product or industry, but are sought to further scientific
research.
(6) Representative of the news media or news media requester means
any person actively gathering news for an entity that is organized and
operated to publish or broadcast news to the public. The term news
means information that is about current events or that would be of
current interest to the public. Examples of news media entities include
television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and
publishers of periodicals (but only in those instances where they can
qualify as disseminators of ``news'') who make their products available
for purchase or subscription by the general public. For ``freelance''
journalists to be regarded as working for a news organization, they
must demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that
organization. A publication contract would be the clearest proof, but
NSF shall also look to the past publication record of a requester in
making this determination. To be in this category, a requester must not
be seeking the requested records for a commercial use. However, a
request for records supporting the news dissemination function of the
requester will not be considered to be for a commercial use.
(7) Review means the examination of a record located in response to
a request in order to determine whether any portion of it is exempt
from disclosure. It also includes processing any record for disclosure,
for example, doing all that is necessary to redact it and prepare it
for disclosure. Review costs are recoverable even if a record
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time includes time spent
considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a business
submitter under Sec. 612.8, but does not include time spent resolving
general legal or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.
(8) Search means the process of looking for and retrieving records
or information responsive to a request. It includes page by page or
line by line identification of information within records and also
includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information from
records maintained in paper or electronic form or format, or stored in
Federal Records Centers. NSF will ensure that searches are done in the
most efficient and least expensive manner reasonably possible. For
example, NSF will not search line by line where duplicating an entire
document would be quicker and less expensive.
(c) Fees. In responding to FOIA requests, NSF will charge the
following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been granted
under paragraph (k) of this section:
(1) Search. (i) Search fees will be charged for all requests, other
than requests made by educational institutions, noncommercial
scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media, subject
to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. NSF may charge for
time spent searching even if responsive records are not located or are
withheld entirely as exempt from disclosure.
(ii) Manual searches for records. Whenever feasible, NSF will
charge at the salary rate(s) (i.e., basic pay plus 16 percent) of the
employee(s) conducting the search. Where a homogeneous class of
personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all administrative/clerical or all
professional/executive), NSF has established an average rate for the
range of grades typically involved. Routine search for records by
administrative personnel are charged at $5.50 for each quarter hour.
When a non-routine, non-clerical search by professional personnel is
conducted (for example, where the task of determining which records
fall within a request requires professional time) the charge is $11.50
for each quarter hour.
(iii) Computer searches of records. NSF will charge at the actual
direct cost of conducting the search. This will include the cost of
operating the computer system(s) for that portion of operating time
that is directly attributable to searching for records responsive to a
FOIA request and operator/programmer salary (i.e., basic pay plus 16
percent) apportionable to the search. When NSF can establish a
reasonable agency-wide average rate for computer operating costs and
operator/programmer salaries involved in FOIA searches, the Foundation
will do so and charge accordingly.
(iv) Archived records. For requests that require the retrieval of
records stored by NSF at a Federal records center operated by the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), additional costs
will be charged in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate
Schedule established by NARA.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will be charged to all
requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this
section. For a paper photocopy of a record (no more than one copy of
which need be supplied), the fee will be ten cents per page. For copies
produced by computer, such as print outs, tapes, compact disks, or
other electronic media, NSF will charge the direct costs, including
operator time, of producing the copy. Where paper documents must be
scanned in order to comply with a requester's preference to receive the
records in an electronic format, the requester shall pay the direct
costs associated with scanning those materials. For other forms of
duplication, NSF will charge the direct costs of that duplication.
(3) Review. Review fees will be charged to requesters who make a
commercial use request. Review fees will be charged only for the
initial record review, in other words, the review done when NSF
determines whether an exemption applies to a particular record or
record portion at the initial request level. NSF may charge for review
even if a record ultimately is not disclosed. No charge will be made
for review at the administrative appeal
[[Page 53284]]
level for an exemption already applied. However, records or record
portions withheld under an exemption that is subsequently determined
not to apply may be reviewed again to determine whether any other
exemption not previously considered applies; the costs of that review
are chargeable where it is made necessary by a change of circumstances.
Review fees will be charged at the salary rate (basic pay plus 16%) of
the employee(s) performing the review.
(d) Limitations on charging fees. (1) No search fee will be charged
for requests by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the news media. (2) Except for
requesters seeking records for a commercial use, NSF will provide
without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent);
and
(ii) The first two hours of search (or the cost equivalent).
(3) Whenever a total fee calculated under paragraph (c) of this
section is $25.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged.
(4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this section
work together. This means that noncommercial requesters will be charged
no fees unless the cost of search in excess of two hours plus the cost
of duplication in excess of 100 pages totals more than $25.00.
Commercial requesters will not be charged unless the costs of search,
review, and duplication total more than $25.00.
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $25.00. When NSF
determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section
will exceed $25.00, it will notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount of the fees, unless the requester has indicated a
willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion
of the fee can be estimated readily, NSF will advise the requester that
the estimated fee may be only a portion of the total fee. In cases in
which a requester has been notified that actual or estimated fees
exceed $25.00, the request will not be considered perfected and further
work will not be done until the requester agrees to pay the anticipated
total fee. Any such agreement should be memorialized in writing. A
notice under this paragraph will offer the requester an opportunity to
discuss the matter with Foundation personnel in order to reformulate
the request to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost, if possible.
If a requester fails to respond within 60 days of notice of actual or
estimated fees with an agreement to pay those fees, NSF may
administratively close the request.
(f) Charges for other services. Apart from the other provisions of
this section, when NSF chooses as a matter of administrative discretion
to provide a requested special service such as certifying that records
are true copies or sending them by other than ordinary mail, the direct
costs of providing the service will be charged to the requester.
(g) Charging interest. NSF may charge interest on any unpaid bill
starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the requester.
Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C.
3717 and will accrue from the date of the billing until payment is
received by NSF. NSF may follow the provisions of the Debt Collection
Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended, and its
administrative procedures, including the use of consumer reporting
agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. Where NSF reasonably believes that a
requester or a group of requesters acting together is attempting to
divide a request into a series of requests for the purpose of avoiding
fees, the agency may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly.
NSF may presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30-
day period have been made in order to avoid fees. Where requests are
separated by a longer period, NSF will aggregate them only where there
exists a solid basis for determining that aggregation is warranted
under all the circumstances involved. Multiple requests involving
unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described
in paragraphs (i) (2) and (3) of this section, NSF will not require the
requester to make an advance payment, -in other words, a payment made
before work is begun or continued on a request. Payment owed for work
already completed (i.e., a prepayment before copies are sent to a
requester) is not an advance payment.
(2) Where NSF determines or estimates that a total fee to be
charged under this section will be more than $250.00, it may require
the requester to make an advance payment of an amount up to the amount
of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request,
except where it receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from
a requester that has a history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly
charged fee to any agency within 30 days of the date of billing, NSF
may require the requester to pay the full amount due, plus any
applicable interest, and to make an advance payment of the full amount
of any anticipated fee, before NSF begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request from that requester.
(4) In cases in which NSF requires advance payment or payment due
under paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the request will not be
considered perfected and further work will not be done on it until the
required payment is received.
(j) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any
statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees
for particular types of records. Where records responsive to requests
are maintained for distribution by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, NSF will inform requesters of the steps
for obtaining records from those sources so that they may do so most
economically.
(k) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive to a
request will be furnished without charge or at a charge reduced below
that established under paragraph (c) of this section where NSF
determines, based on all available information, that disclosure of the
requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to
contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or
activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the first fee waiver requirement is met,
NSF will consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the
requested records concerns ``the operations or activities of the
government.'' The subject of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed:
Whether disclosure is ``likely to contribute'' to an understanding of
government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government
operations or activities in order to be ``likely to contribute'' to an
increased public understanding of those operations or activities.
Disclosure of information already in the public domain, in either
duplicative or substantially identical form, is unlikely to contribute
to such understanding where nothing new would be added to the public's
understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the
[[Page 53285]]
public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the
requested information will contribute to ``public understanding.'' The
disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the subject as opposed to the
individual understanding of the requester. A requester's expertise in
the subject area and ability and intention to effectively convey
information to the public will be considered. A representative of the
news media as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section will normally
be presumed to satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding:
Whether disclosure is likely to contribute ``significantly'' to public
understanding of government operations or activities. The public's
understanding of the subject in question must be enhanced by the
disclosure to a significant extent as compared to the level of public
understanding existing prior to the disclosure. NSF will make no value
judgments about whether information that would contribute significantly
to public understanding of the operations or activities of the
government is ``important'' enough to be made public.
(3) To determine whether the second fee waiver requirement is met,
NSF will consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether
the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. NSF will consider any commercial interest of the
requester (with reference to the definition of ``commercial use'' in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section), or of any person on whose behalf the
requester may be acting, that would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters will be given an opportunity in the
administrative process to provide explanatory information regarding
this consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether any identified
commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in
comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
``primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.'' A fee waiver
or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is
satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of
any identified commercial interest in disclosure. NSF ordinarily will
presume that where a news media requester has satisfied the public
interest standard, the public interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester. Disclosure to data brokers or
others who merely compile and market government information for direct
economic return will not be presumed to primarily serve the public
interest.
(4) Where only some of the requested records satisfy the
requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted for those
records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3) of this section, insofar as
they apply to each request.
Sec. 612.11 Other rights and services.
Nothing in this part will be construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such
person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Dated: August 23, 2013.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-21053 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P