Availability of Records and Information, 53277-53285 [2013-21053]

Download as PDF 53277 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Dated: August 12, 2013. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator, Region 5. 40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 2. Section 52.1880 is amended by adding paragraphs (p)(3), (p)(4), (q)(3) and (q)(4) to read as follows: ■ § 52.1880 matter. * Control strategy: Particulate * * (p) * * * * * (3) The Ohio portion of the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH nonattainment area (Washington County), as submitted on February 29, 2012, and supplemented on April 30, 2013. The maintenance plan determines the insignificance of motor vehicle emissions budgets for Washington County. (4) The Ohio portion of the Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment area (Belmont County), as submitted on April 16, 2012, and supplemented on April 30, 2013. The maintenance plan determines the insignificance of motor vehicle emissions budgets for Belmont County. (q) * * * (3) Ohio’s 2005 NOX, primary PM2.5, and SO2 and 2007/2008 ammonia and VOC emissions inventories satisfy the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for Washington County. (4) Ohio’s 2005 NOX, primary PM2.5, and SO2 and 2007/2008 ammonia and VOC emissions inventories satisfy the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for Belmont County. PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES 3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 4. Section 81.336 is amended by revising the entries for ParkersburgMarietta, WV-OH and Wheeling, WVOH in the table entitled ‘‘Ohio—PM2.5 (Annual NAAQS)’’ to read as follows: ■ § 81.336 * * Ohio. * * * OHIO—PM2.5 [Annual NAAQS] Designation a Designated area Date 1 * * * * * * Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH: Washington County ............................................................................................................................................. * * * * * * Wheeling, WV-OH: Belmont County ................................................................................................................................................... * * * * * * Type * 8/29/2013 Attainment. * 8/29/2013 Attainment. * a Includes 1 This * Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted. * * * * BILLING CODE 6560–50–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 45 CFR Part 612 RIN 3145–AA56 Availability of Records and Information National Science Foundation. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: This document sets forth revisions of the Foundation’s regulations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The revisions implement the provision of the Open FOIA Act of 2009 which amended Exemption 3, update procedural provisions, and allow for multi-track processing of requests. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 The final rule will be effective September 30, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Matthew Powell, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, telephone 703–292–8060 or email mpowell@ nsf.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 14, 2013 the National Science Foundation (NSF) published a proposed rule at 78 FR 28173 requesting public comment on proposed revisions to its existing FOIA regulations at 45 CFR part 612. No comments were received. Accordingly, NSF is revising its FOIA regulations by adopting the revisions as proposed. This revision of Part 612 implements the provision of the Open FOIA Act of 2009 which amends Exemption 3. It also updates and clarifies several procedural provisions concerning FOIA administration, reflects changes in case law, and includes revised current cost figures for DATES: [FR Doc. 2013–20660 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am] Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 calculating and charging fees. The duplication fee will be reduced. In addition, the Foundation will implement multi-track processing. Clarifications and procedural changes are found at § 612.1(b) (General Provisions); § 612.3(b) and (f) (Requirements for making requests); § 612.5(a), (b), (c) and (d)(3) (Timing of responses to requests); § 612.6(a) (Responses to requests); § 612.7(a)(2), (3) and (5)(iii) (Exemptions); and § 612.10(b)(3), and (c)(1) and (2) (Fees). For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the revised rule will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities; the rule addresses the procedures to be followed when submitting or responding to requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act. For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) the revised rule would not significantly or uniquely affect small E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 53278 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations governments and would not result in increased expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more. For purposes of Executive Order 12866, the revised rule is not a significant regulatory action requiring review by the Office of Management and Budget. For the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) it has been determined that this rulemaking does not impose any reporting or recordkeeping requirement on the public. This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (as amended), 5 U.S.C. 804, and will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and export markets. List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 612 Administrative practice and procedure; Freedom of information. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Science Foundation amends 45 CFR Chapter VI by revising Part 612 as follows: PART 612—AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION Sec. 612.1 612.2 612.3 612.4 612.5 612.6 612.7 612.8 612.9 612.10 612.11 General provisions. Public reading room. Requirements for making requests. Responding to requests. Timing of responses to requests. Responses to requests. Exemptions. Business information. Appeals. Fees. Other rights and services. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES General provisions. (a) This part contains the rules that the National Science Foundation (NSF) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. Information routinely made available to the public as part of a regular Foundation activity (for example, program announcements and solicitations, summary of awarded proposals, statistical reports on U.S. science, press releases issued by the Office of Legislative and Public Affairs) may be provided to the public without reliance on this part. As a matter of policy, the Foundation also makes VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 § 612.2 Public reading room. (a) The Foundation maintains a public reading room located in the NSF Library at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 225, Arlington, Virginia, open during regular working hours Monday through Friday. It contains the records that the FOIA requires to be made regularly available for public inspection and copying and has computers and printers available for public use in accessing records. Also available for public inspection and copying are current subject matter indexes of reading room records. (b) Information about FOIA and Privacy at NSF and copies of frequently requested FOIA releases are available online at www.nsf.gov/policies/foia/jsp. Most NSF policy documents, staff instructions, manuals, and other publications that affect a member of the public, are available in electronic form through the ‘‘Publications’’ option on the tool bar on NSF’s Home Page on the World Wide Web at www.nsf.gov. § 612.3 Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended. § 612.1 discretionary disclosures of records or information otherwise exempt under the FOIA whenever disclosure would not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption. This policy, however, does not create any right enforceable in court. When individuals seek records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, NSF processes those requests under both NSF’s Privacy regulations at part 613 of this chapter, and this part. (b) As used in this part, NSF includes one component, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the National Science Foundation. Requirements for making requests. (a) Where to send a request. You may make a FOIA request for records of the National Science Foundation by writing directly to the NSF FOIA Officer, Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. Requests may also be sent by facsimile to (703) 292–9041 or by email to foia@nsf.gov. The National Science Foundation includes one agency component, the NSF Office of the Inspector General (OIG). For records maintained by the NSF OIG, you may write directly to the Office of Inspector General, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1135, Arlington, VA 22230. Requests may also be sent to the OIG by facsimile to (703) 292–9158. The NSF FOIA Officer and the OIG component will also forward requests as appropriate. (b) Form of request. A FOIA request need not be in any particular format, but PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 it must be in writing, include the requester’s name and mailing address, and be clearly identified both on the envelope and in the letter, or in a facsimile or electronic mail message as a Freedom of Information Act or ‘‘FOIA’’ request. It must describe the records sought with sufficient specificity to permit identification, and include agreement to pay applicable fees as described in § 612.10. NSF and its OIG component are not obligated to act upon a request until it meets these procedural requirements. (c) Personal records. (1) If you are making a request for records about yourself and the records are not contained in a Privacy Act system of records, your request will be processed only under the FOIA, since the Privacy Act does not apply. If the records about you are contained in a Privacy Act system of records, NSF will respond with information on how to make a Privacy Act request (see NSF Privacy Act regulations at 45 CFR 613.2). (2) If you are making a request for personal information about another individual, either a written authorization signed by that individual in accordance with § 613.2(f) of this chapter permitting disclosure of those records to you, or proof that that individual is deceased (for example, a copy of a death certificate or a published obituary) will help the agency process your request. (d) Description of records sought. Your request must describe the records that you seek in enough detail to enable NSF personnel to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. A record must have been created or obtained by NSF and be under the control of NSF at the time of the request to be subject to the FOIA. NSF has no obligation under the FOIA to create, compile, or obtain a record to satisfy a FOIA request. Whenever possible, your request should include specific descriptive information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, and subject matter of the record. As a general rule, the more specific you are about the records or type of records that you want, the more likely the Foundation will be able to locate those records in response to your request, and the more likely fees will be reduced or eliminated. If NSF determines that your request does not reasonably describe records, you will be advised what additional information is needed to perfect your request or why your request is otherwise insufficient. (e) Agreement to pay fees. Your request must state that you will promptly pay the total fees chargeable under this regulation or set a maximum E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations amount you are willing to pay. NSF does not charge if fees total less than $25.00. If you seek a waiver of fees, please see § 612.10(k) for a discussion of the factors you must address. If you place an inadequate limit on the amount you will pay, or have failed to make payments for previous requests, NSF may require advance payment (see § 612.10(i)). (f) Receipt date. A request that meets the requirements of this section will be considered received on the date it is properly received by the Office of the General Counsel or the Office of the Inspector General. In determining which records are responsive to a FOIA request, the NSF will include only records in its possession as of the date the NSF or OIG begins its search. If any other date is used, the NSF or OIG shall inform the requester of that date. (g) Publications excluded. For the purpose of public requests for records the term ‘‘record’’ does not include publications which are available to the public in the Federal Register, or by sale or free distribution. Such publications may be obtained from the Government Printing Office, the National Technical Information Service, or through NSF’s Home Page on the World Wide Web at https://www.nsf.gov/ publications/. Requests for such publications will be referred to or the requester informed of the appropriate source. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES § 612.4 Processing requests. (a) Monitoring of requests. The NSF Office of the General Counsel (OGC), or such other office as may be designated by the Director, will serve as the central office for administering these regulations. For records maintained by the Office of Inspector General, that Office will control incoming requests made directly or referred to it, dispatch response letters, and maintain administrative records. For all other records maintained by NSF, OGC (or such other office as may be designated by the Director) will control incoming requests, assign them to appropriate action offices, monitor compliance, consult with action offices on disclosure, approve necessary extensions, dispatch denial and other letters, and maintain administrative records. (b) Consultations and referrals. When the NSF receives a request for a record in its possession that originated with another agency or in which another agency has a substantial interest, it may decide that the other agency of the Federal Government is better able to determine whether the record should or should not be released under the FOIA. VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 (1) If the NSF determines that it is the agency best able to process the record in response to the request, then it will do so, after consultation with the other interested agencies where appropriate. (2) If it determines that it is not the agency best able to process the record, then it will refer the request regarding that record (or portion of the record) to the agency that originated or has a substantial interest in the record in question (but only if that agency is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the agency that originated a record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to disclose it. (3) Whenever NSF refers all or any part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another agency, it ordinarily will notify the requester of the referral and inform the requester of the name of each agency to which the request has been referred and of the part of the request that has been referred, unless such notification would disclose information otherwise exempt. § 612.5 Timing of responses to requests. (a) In general. The NSF and its component, OIG, ordinarily will initiate processing of requests according to their order of receipt. (b) Multitrack processing. (1) NSF and OIG may use two or more processing tracks by distinguishing between simple and more complex requests based on the amount of work and/or time needed to process the request, including through limits based on the number of pages involved. If NSF or OIG does so, it shall advise requesters in its slower track(s) of the limits of its faster track(s). (2) NSF or OIG using multitrack processing may provide requesters in its slower track(s) with an opportunity to limit the scope of their requests in order to qualify for faster processing within the specified limits of the NSF’s or OIG’s faster track(s). The requester may be contacted by telephone, email, or letter, whichever is more efficient in each case. (c) Time for response. The NSF will seek to take appropriate action within 20 days of when a request is properly received or is perfected (excluding the date of receipt, weekends, and legal holidays), whichever is later. A request which otherwise meets the requirements of § 612.3 is perfected when you have reasonably described the records sought under § 612.3(d), and agreed to pay fees under § 612.3(e), or otherwise met the fee requirements under § 612.10. (d) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where the time limits for processing a request cannot be met because of unusual circumstances, as defined in the FOIA, the NSF FOIA Officer or the OIG PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 53279 component will notify the requester as soon as practicable in writing of the unusual circumstances and may extend the response period for up to ten working days. (2) Where the extension is for more than ten working days, the FOIA Officer or the OIG component will provide the requester with an opportunity either to modify the request so that it may be processed within the ten day extension period or to arrange an agreed upon alternative time period with the FOIA Officer or the OIG component for processing the request or a modified request. (3) Where the NSF reasonably believes that multiple requests submitted by a requester, or by a group of requesters acting in concert, constitute a single request that would otherwise involve unusual circumstances, and the requests involve clearly related matters, they may be aggregated. Multiple requests involving unrelated matters will not be aggregated. (e) Expedited processing. (1) If you want to receive expedited processing, you must submit a statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of your knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for requesting expedited processing. (2)(i) Requests and appeals will be given expedited treatment whenever it is determined that a requester has demonstrated compelling need by presenting: (A) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual; or (B) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information. (ii) For example, a requester who is not a full-time member of the news media must establish that he or she is a person whose main professional activity or occupation is information dissemination, though it need not be his or her sole occupation. Such requester also must establish a particular urgency to inform the public about the government activity involved in the request, beyond the public’s right to know about government activity generally, and that the information sought has particular value that would be lost if not disseminated quickly. (3) Within ten calendar days of receipt of a request for expedited processing, the NSF FOIA Officer or OIG component will decide whether to grant it, and will notify the requester of the decision orally or in writing. If a request E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 53280 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations for expedited treatment is granted, the request will be processed as soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing is denied, any appeal of that decision will be acted on expeditiously. § 612.6 Responses to requests. (a) Acknowledgment of requests. The NSF or OIG will ordinarily send an email acknowledgment of all FOIA requests with an assigned request number for further reference and an estimated response date. (b) Grants of requests. Once the NSF makes a determination to grant a request in whole or in part, it will notify the requester in writing. The NSF will inform the requester in the notice of any applicable fee and will disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of applicable fees. Records disclosed in part will be marked or annotated to show both the amount and the location of the information deleted where practicable. (c) Denials of requests. (1) Denials of FOIA requests will be made by the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of the Inspector General, or such other office as may be designated by the Director. The response letter will briefly set forth the reasons for the denial, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied in denying the request. It will also provide the name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial, will inform the requester of the right to appeal, and will, where appropriate, include an estimate of the volume of any requested materials withheld. An estimate need not be provided when the volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption. (2) Requesters can appeal an agency determination to withhold all or part of any requested record; a determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that what has been requested is not a record subject to the Act; a disapproval of a fee category claim by a requester; denial of a fee waiver or reduction; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment (see § 612.9). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES § 612.7 Exemptions. (a) Exemptions from disclosure. The following types of records or information may be withholdable as exempt in full or in part from mandatory public disclosure: (1) Exemption 1—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1). Records specifically authorized and properly classified pursuant to Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 policy. NSF does not have classifying authority and normally does not deal with classified materials. (2) Exemption 2—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2). Records related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of NSF. Examples of records normally exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: Information relating to position management and manpower utilization, such as internal staffing plans, authorizations or controls, or involved in determination of the qualifications of candidates for employment, advancement, or promotion including examination questions and answers. (3) Exemption 3—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Records specifically exempted from disclosure by another statute that either requires that the information be withheld in a such way that the agency has no discretion in the matter; or establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of information to be withheld; and, if enacted after the date of enactment of the OPEN FOIA Act of 2009, October 28, 2009, specifically cites to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Examples of records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: (i) Records that disclose any invention in which the Federal Government owns or may own a right, title, or interest (including a nonexclusive license), 35 U.S.C. 205; (ii) Contractor proposals not specifically set forth or incorporated by reference into a contract, 41 U.S.C. 253b(m); (iii) Information protected by the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. 423; (iv) Statistical information protected by section 14(i) of the NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1873(i) and/or the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3501 note. (4) Exemption 4—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person, and privileged or confidential. Information subject to this exemption is that customarily held in confidence by the originator(s), including nonprofit organizations and their employees. Release of such information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the originator or submitter, or impair the Foundation’s ability to obtain such information in the future. NSF will process information potentially exempted from disclosure by Exemption 4 under § 612.8. Examples of records or information normally exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (i) Information received in confidence, such as grant applications, fellowship applications, and research proposals prior to award; (ii) Confidential scientific and manufacturing processes or developments, and technical, scientific, statistical data or other information developed by a grantee; (iii) Technical, scientific, or statistical data, and commercial or financial information privileged or received in confidence from an existing or potential contractor or subcontractor, in connection with bids, proposals, or contracts, concerning contract performance, income, profits, losses, and expenditures, as well as trade secrets, inventions, discoveries, or other proprietary data. When the provisions of 41 U.S.C. 253b(m) or 41 U.S.C. 423 are met, certain proprietary and source selection information may also be withheld under Exemption 3; (iv) Confidential proprietary information submitted on a voluntary basis; (v) Statements or information collected in the course of inspections, investigations, or audits, when such statements are received in confidence from the individual and retained in confidence because they reveal trade secrets or commercial or financial information normally considered confidential or privileged. (5) Exemption 5–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5). Inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a private party in litigation with NSF. Factual material contained in such records will be considered for release if it can be reasonably segregated and is not otherwise exempt. Examples of records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: (i) Those portions of reports, memoranda, correspondence, workpapers, minutes of meetings, and staff papers, containing evaluations, advice, opinions, suggestions, or other deliberative material that are prepared for use within NSF or within the Executive Branch of the Government by agency personnel and others acting in a consultant or advisory capacity; (ii) Advance information on proposed NSF plans to procure, lease, or otherwise acquire, or dispose of materials, real estate, facilities, services or functions, when such information would provide undue or unfair competitive advantage to private interests or impede legitimate government functions; (iii) Negotiating positions or limits at least until the execution of a contract (including a grant or cooperative agreement) or the completion of the E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations action to which the negotiating positions were applicable. They may also be exempt pursuant to other provisions of this section; (iv) Trade secret or other confidential research development, or commercial information owned by the Government, where premature release is likely to affect the Government’s negotiating position or other commercial interest; (iv) Records prepared for use in proceedings before any Federal or State court or administrative body; (vi) Evaluations of and comments on specific grant applications, research projects or proposals, fellowship applications or nominations or other individual awards, or potential contractors and their products, whether made by NSF personnel or by external reviewers acting either individually or in panels, committees or similar groups; (vii) Preliminary, draft or unapproved documents, such as opinions, recommendations, evaluations, decisions, or studies conducted or supported by NSF; (viii) Proposed budget requests, and supporting projections used or arising in the preparation and/or execution of a budget; proposed annual and multi-year policy, priorities, program and financial plan and supporting papers; (ix) Those portions of official reports of inspection, reports of the Inspector General, audits, investigations, or surveys pertaining to safety, security, or the internal management, administration, or operation of NSF, when these records have traditionally been treated by the courts as privileged against disclosure in litigation. (6) Exemption 6–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). Personnel and medical files and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The exemption may apply to protect the privacy of living persons and of living close survivors of a deceased person identified in a record. Information in such files which is not otherwise exempt from disclosure pursuant to other provisions of this section will be released to the subject or to his designated legal representative, and may be disclosed to others with the subject’s written consent. Examples of records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: (i) Reports, records, and other materials pertaining to individual cases in which disciplinary or other administrative action has been or may be taken. Opinions and orders resulting from those administrative or disciplinary proceedings shall be disclosed without identifying details if used, cited, or relied upon as precedent; VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 (ii) Records compiled to evaluate or adjudicate the suitability of candidates for employment, and the eligibility of individuals (civilian or contractor employees) for security clearances, or for access to classified information; (iii) Reports and evaluations which reflect upon the qualifications or competence of individuals; (iv) Personal information such as home addresses and telephone and facsimile numbers, private email addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth, marital status and the like; (v) The exemption also applies when the fact of the existence or nonexistence of a responsive record would itself reveal personal, private information, and the public interest in disclosure is not sufficient to outweigh the privacy interest. (7) Exemption 7–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7). Records or information compiled for civil or criminal law enforcement purposes, including the implementation of Executive Orders or regulations issued pursuant to law. This exemption may exempt from mandatory disclosure records not originally created, but later gathered, for law enforcement purposes. (i) This exemption applies only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information: (A) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings; (B) Would deprive a person of the right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication; (C) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of a living person, or living close survivors of a deceased person identified in a record; (D) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a source within the Federal Government, or a State, local, or foreign agency or authority, or any private institution, that furnished information on a confidential basis; and information furnished by a confidential source and obtained by a criminal law enforcement authority in a criminal investigation; (E) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual. (ii) Examples of records normally exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 53281 (A) The identity and statements of complainants or witnesses, or other material developed during the course of an investigation and all materials prepared in connection with related government litigation or adjudicative proceedings; (B) The identity of firms or individuals investigated for alleged irregularities involving NSF grants, contracts or other matters when no indictment has been obtained, no civil action has been filed against them by the United States, or no governmentwide public suspension or debarment has occurred; (C) Information obtained in confidence, expressed or implied, in the course of a criminal investigation by the NSF Office of the Inspector General. (iii) The exclusions contained in 5 U.S.C. 552(c)(1) and (2) may also apply to these records. (8) Exemption 8–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8). Records contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of any agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions. (9) Exemption 9–5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9). Records containing geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. (b) Deletion of exempt portions and identifying details. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record will be provided to requesters after deletion of the portions which are exempt. Whenever any final opinion, order, or other materials required to be made available relates to a private party or parties and the release of the name(s) or other identifying details will constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the record shall be published or made available with such identifying details left blank, or shall be published or made available with obviously fictitious substitutes and with a notification such as the following: Names of parties and certain other identifying details have been removed (and fictitious names substituted) in order to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of the individuals involved. § 612.8 Business information. (a) In general. Business information obtained by the Foundation from a submitter of that information will be disclosed under the FOIA only under this section’s procedures. (b) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Business Information means commercial or financial information obtained by the Foundation from a E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES 53282 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations submitter that may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA and § 612.7(a)(4). (2) Submitter means any person or entity from whom the Foundation obtains business information, directly or indirectly. The term includes corporations; state, local, and tribal governments; and foreign governments. (c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business information must use good faith efforts to designate, by appropriate markings, either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time thereafter, any portions of its submission that it considers to be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. These designations will expire ten years after the date of the submission unless the submitter requests, and provides justification for, a longer designation period. (d) Notice to submitters. The Foundation will provide a submitter with prompt written notice of a FOIA request or administrative appeal that seeks its business information wherever required under this section, in order to give the submitter an opportunity to object to disclosure of any specified portion of that information under paragraph (f) of this section. The notice shall either describe the business information requested or include copies of the requested records or record portions containing the information. (e) Where notice is required. Notice will be given to a submitter wherever: (1) The information has been designated in good faith by the submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under Exemption 4; or (2) The Foundation has reason to believe that the information may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. (f) Opportunity to object to disclosure. NSF will allow a submitter a reasonable time, consistent with statutory requirements, to respond to the notice described in paragraph (d) of this section. If a submitter has any objection to disclosure, it must submit a detailed written statement. The statement must specify all grounds for withholding any portion of the information under any exemption of the FOIA and, in the case of Exemption 4, must show why the information is a trade secret, or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential. In the event that a submitter fails to respond within the time specified in the notice, the submitter will be considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information. Information provided by a submitter under this paragraph may VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 itself be a record subject to disclosure under the FOIA. (g) Notice of intent to disclose. The Foundation will consider a submitter’s objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in deciding whether to disclose business information. Whenever it decides to disclose business information over the objection of a submitter, the Foundation will give the submitter written notice, which will include: (1) A statement of the reason(s) why the submitter’s disclosure objections were not sustained; (2) A description of the business information to be disclosed; and (3) A specified disclosure date, which will be a reasonable time subsequent to the notice. (h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section will not apply if: (1) The Foundation determines that the information should not be disclosed (the Foundation protects from disclosure to third parties information about specific unfunded applications, including pending, withdrawn, or declined proposals); (2) The information lawfully has been published or has been officially made available to the public; (3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 12600 (3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 235); or (4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of this section appears obviously frivolous, in which case the Foundation will, within a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure date, give the submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the information. (i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit seeking to compel the disclosure of business information, the Foundation will promptly notify the submitter(s). Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit seeking to prevent the disclosure of business information, the Foundation will notify the requester(s). § 612.9 Appeals. (a) Appeals of denials. You may appeal a denial of your request to the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You must make your appeal in writing and it must be received by the Office of the General Counsel within ten days of the receipt of the denial (weekends, legal holidays, and the date of receipt PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 excluded). You must clearly mark your appeal letter and the envelope or your electronic submission as a ‘‘Freedom of Information Act Appeal.’’ Your appeal letter must include a copy of your written request and the denial together with any written argument you wish to submit. (b) Responses to appeals. A written decision on your appeal will be made by the General Counsel. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole or in part will contain a statement of the reason(s) for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied, and will inform you of the FOIA provisions for court review of the decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal, in whole or in part, you will be notified in a written decision and your request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal decision. (c) When appeal is required. If you wish to seek review by a court of any denial, you must first appeal it under this section. § 612.10 Fees (a) In general. NSF will charge for processing requests under the FOIA in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, except where fees are limited under paragraph (d) of this section or where a waiver or reduction of fees is granted under paragraph (k) of this section. If fees are applicable, NSF will itemize the amounts charged. NSF may collect all applicable fees before sending copies of requested records to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check or money order made payable to the Treasury of the United States. (b) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Commercial use request means a request from or on behalf of a person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers his or her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can include furthering those interests through litigation. When it appears that the requester will put the records to a commercial use, either because of the nature of the request itself or because NSF has reasonable cause to doubt a requester’s stated use, NSF will provide the requester a reasonable opportunity to submit further clarification. (2) Direct costs means those expenses that an agency actually incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct costs include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the work (the basic rate of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations that rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating duplication machinery. Not included in direct costs are overhead expenses such as the costs of space and heating or lighting of the facility in which the records are kept. (3) Duplication means the making of a copy of a record, or of the information contained in it, necessary to respond to a FOIA request. Copies can take the form of paper, microform, audiovisual materials, or electronic records (for example, magnetic tape or compact disk) among others. NSF will honor a requester’s specified preference of form or format of disclosure if the record is readily reproducible by NSF, with reasonable effort, in the requested form or format. (4) Educational institution means a preschool, a public or private elementary or secondary school, an institution of undergraduate higher education, an institution of graduate higher education, an institution of professional education, or an institution of vocational education that operates a program of scholarly research. To be in this category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by and made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the records are not sought for a commercial use, but are sought to further scholarly research. (5) Noncommercial scientific institution means an institution that is not operated on a ‘‘commercial’’ basis, as that term is defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that is operated solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research, the results of which are not intended to promote any particular product or industry. To be in this category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by and made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the records are not sought for a commercial use or to promote any particular product or industry, but are sought to further scientific research. (6) Representative of the news media or news media requester means any person actively gathering news for an entity that is organized and operated to publish or broadcast news to the public. The term news means information that is about current events or that would be of current interest to the public. Examples of news media entities include television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and publishers of periodicals (but only in those instances where they can qualify as disseminators of ‘‘news’’) who make their products available for purchase or subscription by the general public. For ‘‘freelance’’ journalists to be regarded as working for a news organization, they VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 must demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that organization. A publication contract would be the clearest proof, but NSF shall also look to the past publication record of a requester in making this determination. To be in this category, a requester must not be seeking the requested records for a commercial use. However, a request for records supporting the news dissemination function of the requester will not be considered to be for a commercial use. (7) Review means the examination of a record located in response to a request in order to determine whether any portion of it is exempt from disclosure. It also includes processing any record for disclosure, for example, doing all that is necessary to redact it and prepare it for disclosure. Review costs are recoverable even if a record ultimately is not disclosed. Review time includes time spent considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a business submitter under § 612.8, but does not include time spent resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions. (8) Search means the process of looking for and retrieving records or information responsive to a request. It includes page by page or line by line identification of information within records and also includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information from records maintained in paper or electronic form or format, or stored in Federal Records Centers. NSF will ensure that searches are done in the most efficient and least expensive manner reasonably possible. For example, NSF will not search line by line where duplicating an entire document would be quicker and less expensive. (c) Fees. In responding to FOIA requests, NSF will charge the following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been granted under paragraph (k) of this section: (1) Search. (i) Search fees will be charged for all requests, other than requests made by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. NSF may charge for time spent searching even if responsive records are not located or are withheld entirely as exempt from disclosure. (ii) Manual searches for records. Whenever feasible, NSF will charge at the salary rate(s) (i.e., basic pay plus 16 percent) of the employee(s) conducting the search. Where a homogeneous class of personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all administrative/clerical or all PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 53283 professional/executive), NSF has established an average rate for the range of grades typically involved. Routine search for records by administrative personnel are charged at $5.50 for each quarter hour. When a non-routine, nonclerical search by professional personnel is conducted (for example, where the task of determining which records fall within a request requires professional time) the charge is $11.50 for each quarter hour. (iii) Computer searches of records. NSF will charge at the actual direct cost of conducting the search. This will include the cost of operating the computer system(s) for that portion of operating time that is directly attributable to searching for records responsive to a FOIA request and operator/programmer salary (i.e., basic pay plus 16 percent) apportionable to the search. When NSF can establish a reasonable agency-wide average rate for computer operating costs and operator/ programmer salaries involved in FOIA searches, the Foundation will do so and charge accordingly. (iv) Archived records. For requests that require the retrieval of records stored by NSF at a Federal records center operated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), additional costs will be charged in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate Schedule established by NARA. (2) Duplication. Duplication fees will be charged to all requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. For a paper photocopy of a record (no more than one copy of which need be supplied), the fee will be ten cents per page. For copies produced by computer, such as print outs, tapes, compact disks, or other electronic media, NSF will charge the direct costs, including operator time, of producing the copy. Where paper documents must be scanned in order to comply with a requester’s preference to receive the records in an electronic format, the requester shall pay the direct costs associated with scanning those materials. For other forms of duplication, NSF will charge the direct costs of that duplication. (3) Review. Review fees will be charged to requesters who make a commercial use request. Review fees will be charged only for the initial record review, in other words, the review done when NSF determines whether an exemption applies to a particular record or record portion at the initial request level. NSF may charge for review even if a record ultimately is not disclosed. No charge will be made for review at the administrative appeal E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES 53284 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations level for an exemption already applied. However, records or record portions withheld under an exemption that is subsequently determined not to apply may be reviewed again to determine whether any other exemption not previously considered applies; the costs of that review are chargeable where it is made necessary by a change of circumstances. Review fees will be charged at the salary rate (basic pay plus 16%) of the employee(s) performing the review. (d) Limitations on charging fees. (1) No search fee will be charged for requests by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media. (2) Except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use, NSF will provide without charge: (i) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent); and (ii) The first two hours of search (or the cost equivalent). (3) Whenever a total fee calculated under paragraph (c) of this section is $25.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged. (4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this section work together. This means that noncommercial requesters will be charged no fees unless the cost of search in excess of two hours plus the cost of duplication in excess of 100 pages totals more than $25.00. Commercial requesters will not be charged unless the costs of search, review, and duplication total more than $25.00. (e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $25.00. When NSF determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section will exceed $25.00, it will notify the requester of the actual or estimated amount of the fees, unless the requester has indicated a willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion of the fee can be estimated readily, NSF will advise the requester that the estimated fee may be only a portion of the total fee. In cases in which a requester has been notified that actual or estimated fees exceed $25.00, the request will not be considered perfected and further work will not be done until the requester agrees to pay the anticipated total fee. Any such agreement should be memorialized in writing. A notice under this paragraph will offer the requester an opportunity to discuss the matter with Foundation personnel in order to reformulate the request to meet the requester’s needs at a lower cost, if possible. If a requester fails to respond within 60 days of notice of actual or estimated fees with an agreement to pay VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 those fees, NSF may administratively close the request. (f) Charges for other services. Apart from the other provisions of this section, when NSF chooses as a matter of administrative discretion to provide a requested special service such as certifying that records are true copies or sending them by other than ordinary mail, the direct costs of providing the service will be charged to the requester. (g) Charging interest. NSF may charge interest on any unpaid bill starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the requester. Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the date of the billing until payment is received by NSF. NSF may follow the provisions of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97–365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended, and its administrative procedures, including the use of consumer reporting agencies, collection agencies, and offset. (h) Aggregating requests. Where NSF reasonably believes that a requester or a group of requesters acting together is attempting to divide a request into a series of requests for the purpose of avoiding fees, the agency may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly. NSF may presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30day period have been made in order to avoid fees. Where requests are separated by a longer period, NSF will aggregate them only where there exists a solid basis for determining that aggregation is warranted under all the circumstances involved. Multiple requests involving unrelated matters will not be aggregated. (i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described in paragraphs (i) (2) and (3) of this section, NSF will not require the requester to make an advance payment, -in other words, a payment made before work is begun or continued on a request. Payment owed for work already completed (i.e., a prepayment before copies are sent to a requester) is not an advance payment. (2) Where NSF determines or estimates that a total fee to be charged under this section will be more than $250.00, it may require the requester to make an advance payment of an amount up to the amount of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request, except where it receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from a requester that has a history of prompt payment. (3) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly charged fee to any agency within 30 days of the date of billing, NSF may require the requester to pay the full amount due, PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 plus any applicable interest, and to make an advance payment of the full amount of any anticipated fee, before NSF begins to process a new request or continues to process a pending request from that requester. (4) In cases in which NSF requires advance payment or payment due under paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the request will not be considered perfected and further work will not be done on it until the required payment is received. (j) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees for particular types of records. Where records responsive to requests are maintained for distribution by agencies operating such statutorily based fee schedule programs, NSF will inform requesters of the steps for obtaining records from those sources so that they may do so most economically. (k) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive to a request will be furnished without charge or at a charge reduced below that established under paragraph (c) of this section where NSF determines, based on all available information, that disclosure of the requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. (2) To determine whether the first fee waiver requirement is met, NSF will consider the following factors: (i) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the requested records concerns ‘‘the operations or activities of the government.’’ The subject of the requested records must concern identifiable operations or activities of the federal government, with a connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated. (ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed: Whether disclosure is ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an understanding of government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the requested records must be meaningfully informative about government operations or activities in order to be ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an increased public understanding of those operations or activities. Disclosure of information already in the public domain, in either duplicative or substantially identical form, is unlikely to contribute to such understanding where nothing new would be added to the public’s understanding. (iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the requested information will contribute to ‘‘public understanding.’’ The disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad audience of persons interested in the subject as opposed to the individual understanding of the requester. A requester’s expertise in the subject area and ability and intention to effectively convey information to the public will be considered. A representative of the news media as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section will normally be presumed to satisfy this consideration. (iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding: Whether disclosure is likely to contribute ‘‘significantly’’ to public understanding of government operations or activities. The public’s understanding of the subject in question must be enhanced by the disclosure to a significant extent as compared to the level of public understanding existing prior to the disclosure. NSF will make no value judgments about whether information that would contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government is ‘‘important’’ enough to be made public. (3) To determine whether the second fee waiver requirement is met, NSF will consider the following factors: (i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the requested disclosure. NSF will consider any commercial interest of the requester (with reference to the definition of ‘‘commercial use’’ in paragraph (b)(1) of this section), or of any person on whose behalf the requester may be acting, that would be furthered by the requested disclosure. Requesters will be given an opportunity in the administrative process to provide explanatory information regarding this consideration. (ii) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether any identified commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is ‘‘primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.’’ A fee waiver or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of any identified commercial interest in disclosure. NSF ordinarily will presume that where a news media requester has satisfied the public interest standard, the public interest will be the interest primarily served by disclosure to that requester. Disclosure VerDate Mar<15>2010 22:38 Aug 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 to data brokers or others who merely compile and market government information for direct economic return will not be presumed to primarily serve the public interest. (4) Where only some of the requested records satisfy the requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted for those records. (5) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees should address the factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3) of this section, insofar as they apply to each request. § 612.11 Other rights and services. Nothing in this part will be construed to entitle any person, as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA. Dated: August 23, 2013. Lawrence Rudolph, General Counsel. 53285 West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–2011–0363 in the ‘‘Search’’ box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. William Abernathy, Vessel and Facility Operating Standards Division (CG–OES–2), Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–1363, email William.J.Abernathy@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents for Preamble [FR Doc. 2013–21053 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 46 CFR Parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and 188 [Docket No. USCG–2011–0363] I. Abbreviations II. Discussion III. Regulatory Analyses A. Regulatory Planning and Review B. Small Entities C. Assistance for Small Entities D. Collection of Information E. Federalism F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act G. Taking of Private Property H. Civil Justice Reform I. Protection of Children J. Indian Tribal Governments K. Energy Effects L. Technical Standards M. Environment RIN 1625–AC03 (formerly RIN 1625–AB71) I. Abbreviations Seagoing Barges Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Coast Guard is revising several vessel inspection and certification regulations to align them with a statutory definition of ‘‘seagoing barge’’ and with a statutory exemption from inspection and certification requirements for certain seagoing barges. The revisions are intended to eliminate ambiguity in existing regulations, to reduce the potential for confusion among the regulated public, and to help the Coast Guard perform its maritime safety and stewardship missions. SUMMARY: This final rule is effective September 30, 2013. ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket USCG–2011–0363 and are available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 CFR Code of Federal Regulations DFR Direct final rule E.O. Executive Order FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Pub. L. Public Law U.S.C. United States Code II. Discussion The legal basis for this final rule is 46 U.S.C. 3306, which requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to prescribe regulations for Coast Guardinspected vessels, and Executive Order (E.O.) 12988, Civil Justice Reform, section 3(a), which obligates Federal agencies to eliminate ambiguity in existing regulations. The Secretary’s authority under 46 U.S.C. 3306 is delegated to the Coast Guard in Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1 paragraph (92.b). The purpose of this final rule is to finalize revisions that are intended to align Coast Guard regulations with current statutory language, thereby eliminating ambiguity that could cause confusion among the regulated public. That ambiguity arose as the result of two E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53277-53285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

45 CFR Part 612

RIN 3145-AA56


Availability of Records and Information

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document sets forth revisions of the Foundation's 
regulations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The revisions 
implement the provision of the Open FOIA Act of 2009 which amended 
Exemption 3, update procedural provisions, and allow for multi-track 
processing of requests.

DATES: The final rule will be effective September 30, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Matthew Powell, Assistant General 
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 
telephone 703-292-8060 or email mpowell@nsf.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 14, 2013 the National Science 
Foundation (NSF) published a proposed rule at 78 FR 28173 requesting 
public comment on proposed revisions to its existing FOIA regulations 
at 45 CFR part 612. No comments were received. Accordingly, NSF is 
revising its FOIA regulations by adopting the revisions as proposed. 
This revision of Part 612 implements the provision of the Open FOIA Act 
of 2009 which amends Exemption 3. It also updates and clarifies several 
procedural provisions concerning FOIA administration, reflects changes 
in case law, and includes revised current cost figures for calculating 
and charging fees. The duplication fee will be reduced. In addition, 
the Foundation will implement multi-track processing. Clarifications 
and procedural changes are found at Sec.  612.1(b) (General 
Provisions); Sec.  612.3(b) and (f) (Requirements for making requests); 
Sec.  612.5(a), (b), (c) and (d)(3) (Timing of responses to requests); 
Sec.  612.6(a) (Responses to requests); Sec.  612.7(a)(2), (3) and 
(5)(iii) (Exemptions); and Sec.  612.10(b)(3), and (c)(1) and (2) 
(Fees).
    For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the 
revised rule will not have a significant economic effect on a 
substantial number of small entities; the rule addresses the procedures 
to be followed when submitting or responding to requests for records 
under the Freedom of Information Act. For purposes of the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) the revised rule would not 
significantly or uniquely affect small

[[Page 53278]]

governments and would not result in increased expenditures by State, 
local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 
million or more. For purposes of Executive Order 12866, the revised 
rule is not a significant regulatory action requiring review by the 
Office of Management and Budget. For the purposes of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) it has been determined that this 
rulemaking does not impose any reporting or recordkeeping requirement 
on the public. This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (as 
amended), 5 U.S.C. 804, and will not result in an annual effect on the 
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; 
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, 
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based 
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and 
export markets.

List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 612

    Administrative practice and procedure; Freedom of information.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Science 
Foundation amends 45 CFR Chapter VI by revising Part 612 as follows:

PART 612--AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION

Sec.
612.1 General provisions.
612.2 Public reading room.
612.3 Requirements for making requests.
612.4 Responding to requests.
612.5 Timing of responses to requests.
612.6 Responses to requests.
612.7 Exemptions.
612.8 Business information.
612.9 Appeals.
612.10 Fees.
612.11 Other rights and services.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.


Sec.  612.1  General provisions.

    (a) This part contains the rules that the National Science 
Foundation (NSF) follows in processing requests for records under the 
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. Information routinely 
made available to the public as part of a regular Foundation activity 
(for example, program announcements and solicitations, summary of 
awarded proposals, statistical reports on U.S. science, press releases 
issued by the Office of Legislative and Public Affairs) may be provided 
to the public without reliance on this part. As a matter of policy, the 
Foundation also makes discretionary disclosures of records or 
information otherwise exempt under the FOIA whenever disclosure would 
not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption. This 
policy, however, does not create any right enforceable in court. When 
individuals seek records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, NSF processes those requests under both NSF's 
Privacy regulations at part 613 of this chapter, and this part.
    (b) As used in this part, NSF includes one component, the Office of 
the Inspector General (OIG) of the National Science Foundation.


Sec.  612.2  Public reading room.

    (a) The Foundation maintains a public reading room located in the 
NSF Library at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 225, Arlington, Virginia, 
open during regular working hours Monday through Friday. It contains 
the records that the FOIA requires to be made regularly available for 
public inspection and copying and has computers and printers available 
for public use in accessing records. Also available for public 
inspection and copying are current subject matter indexes of reading 
room records.
    (b) Information about FOIA and Privacy at NSF and copies of 
frequently requested FOIA releases are available online at www.nsf.gov/policies/foia/jsp. Most NSF policy documents, staff instructions, 
manuals, and other publications that affect a member of the public, are 
available in electronic form through the ``Publications'' option on the 
tool bar on NSF's Home Page on the World Wide Web at www.nsf.gov.


Sec.  612.3  Requirements for making requests.

    (a) Where to send a request. You may make a FOIA request for 
records of the National Science Foundation by writing directly to the 
NSF FOIA Officer, Office of the General Counsel, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Requests may also be sent by facsimile to (703) 292-9041 or by email to 
foia@nsf.gov.
    The National Science Foundation includes one agency component, the 
NSF Office of the Inspector General (OIG). For records maintained by 
the NSF OIG, you may write directly to the Office of Inspector General, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1135, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Requests may also be sent to the OIG by facsimile 
to (703) 292-9158. The NSF FOIA Officer and the OIG component will also 
forward requests as appropriate.
    (b) Form of request. A FOIA request need not be in any particular 
format, but it must be in writing, include the requester's name and 
mailing address, and be clearly identified both on the envelope and in 
the letter, or in a facsimile or electronic mail message as a Freedom 
of Information Act or ``FOIA'' request. It must describe the records 
sought with sufficient specificity to permit identification, and 
include agreement to pay applicable fees as described in Sec.  612.10. 
NSF and its OIG component are not obligated to act upon a request until 
it meets these procedural requirements.
    (c) Personal records. (1) If you are making a request for records 
about yourself and the records are not contained in a Privacy Act 
system of records, your request will be processed only under the FOIA, 
since the Privacy Act does not apply. If the records about you are 
contained in a Privacy Act system of records, NSF will respond with 
information on how to make a Privacy Act request (see NSF Privacy Act 
regulations at 45 CFR 613.2).
    (2) If you are making a request for personal information about 
another individual, either a written authorization signed by that 
individual in accordance with Sec.  613.2(f) of this chapter permitting 
disclosure of those records to you, or proof that that individual is 
deceased (for example, a copy of a death certificate or a published 
obituary) will help the agency process your request.
    (d) Description of records sought. Your request must describe the 
records that you seek in enough detail to enable NSF personnel to 
locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. A record must have been 
created or obtained by NSF and be under the control of NSF at the time 
of the request to be subject to the FOIA. NSF has no obligation under 
the FOIA to create, compile, or obtain a record to satisfy a FOIA 
request. Whenever possible, your request should include specific 
descriptive information about each record sought, such as the date, 
title or name, author, recipient, and subject matter of the record. As 
a general rule, the more specific you are about the records or type of 
records that you want, the more likely the Foundation will be able to 
locate those records in response to your request, and the more likely 
fees will be reduced or eliminated. If NSF determines that your request 
does not reasonably describe records, you will be advised what 
additional information is needed to perfect your request or why your 
request is otherwise insufficient.
    (e) Agreement to pay fees. Your request must state that you will 
promptly pay the total fees chargeable under this regulation or set a 
maximum

[[Page 53279]]

amount you are willing to pay. NSF does not charge if fees total less 
than $25.00. If you seek a waiver of fees, please see Sec.  612.10(k) 
for a discussion of the factors you must address. If you place an 
inadequate limit on the amount you will pay, or have failed to make 
payments for previous requests, NSF may require advance payment (see 
Sec.  612.10(i)).
    (f) Receipt date. A request that meets the requirements of this 
section will be considered received on the date it is properly received 
by the Office of the General Counsel or the Office of the Inspector 
General. In determining which records are responsive to a FOIA request, 
the NSF will include only records in its possession as of the date the 
NSF or OIG begins its search. If any other date is used, the NSF or OIG 
shall inform the requester of that date.
    (g) Publications excluded. For the purpose of public requests for 
records the term ``record'' does not include publications which are 
available to the public in the Federal Register, or by sale or free 
distribution. Such publications may be obtained from the Government 
Printing Office, the National Technical Information Service, or through 
NSF's Home Page on the World Wide Web at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/. Requests for such publications will be referred to or 
the requester informed of the appropriate source.


Sec.  612.4  Processing requests.

    (a) Monitoring of requests. The NSF Office of the General Counsel 
(OGC), or such other office as may be designated by the Director, will 
serve as the central office for administering these regulations. For 
records maintained by the Office of Inspector General, that Office will 
control incoming requests made directly or referred to it, dispatch 
response letters, and maintain administrative records. For all other 
records maintained by NSF, OGC (or such other office as may be 
designated by the Director) will control incoming requests, assign them 
to appropriate action offices, monitor compliance, consult with action 
offices on disclosure, approve necessary extensions, dispatch denial 
and other letters, and maintain administrative records.
    (b) Consultations and referrals. When the NSF receives a request 
for a record in its possession that originated with another agency or 
in which another agency has a substantial interest, it may decide that 
the other agency of the Federal Government is better able to determine 
whether the record should or should not be released under the FOIA.
    (1) If the NSF determines that it is the agency best able to 
process the record in response to the request, then it will do so, 
after consultation with the other interested agencies where 
appropriate.
    (2) If it determines that it is not the agency best able to process 
the record, then it will refer the request regarding that record (or 
portion of the record) to the agency that originated or has a 
substantial interest in the record in question (but only if that agency 
is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the agency that originated a 
record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to 
disclose it.
    (3) Whenever NSF refers all or any part of the responsibility for 
responding to a request to another agency, it ordinarily will notify 
the requester of the referral and inform the requester of the name of 
each agency to which the request has been referred and of the part of 
the request that has been referred, unless such notification would 
disclose information otherwise exempt.


Sec.  612.5  Timing of responses to requests.

    (a) In general. The NSF and its component, OIG, ordinarily will 
initiate processing of requests according to their order of receipt.
    (b) Multitrack processing. (1) NSF and OIG may use two or more 
processing tracks by distinguishing between simple and more complex 
requests based on the amount of work and/or time needed to process the 
request, including through limits based on the number of pages 
involved. If NSF or OIG does so, it shall advise requesters in its 
slower track(s) of the limits of its faster track(s).
    (2) NSF or OIG using multitrack processing may provide requesters 
in its slower track(s) with an opportunity to limit the scope of their 
requests in order to qualify for faster processing within the specified 
limits of the NSF's or OIG's faster track(s). The requester may be 
contacted by telephone, email, or letter, whichever is more efficient 
in each case.
    (c) Time for response. The NSF will seek to take appropriate action 
within 20 days of when a request is properly received or is perfected 
(excluding the date of receipt, weekends, and legal holidays), 
whichever is later. A request which otherwise meets the requirements of 
Sec.  612.3 is perfected when you have reasonably described the records 
sought under Sec.  612.3(d), and agreed to pay fees under Sec.  
612.3(e), or otherwise met the fee requirements under Sec.  612.10.
    (d) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where the time limits for processing 
a request cannot be met because of unusual circumstances, as defined in 
the FOIA, the NSF FOIA Officer or the OIG component will notify the 
requester as soon as practicable in writing of the unusual 
circumstances and may extend the response period for up to ten working 
days.
    (2) Where the extension is for more than ten working days, the FOIA 
Officer or the OIG component will provide the requester with an 
opportunity either to modify the request so that it may be processed 
within the ten day extension period or to arrange an agreed upon 
alternative time period with the FOIA Officer or the OIG component for 
processing the request or a modified request.
    (3) Where the NSF reasonably believes that multiple requests 
submitted by a requester, or by a group of requesters acting in 
concert, constitute a single request that would otherwise involve 
unusual circumstances, and the requests involve clearly related 
matters, they may be aggregated. Multiple requests involving unrelated 
matters will not be aggregated.
    (e) Expedited processing. (1) If you want to receive expedited 
processing, you must submit a statement, certified to be true and 
correct to the best of your knowledge and belief, explaining in detail 
the basis for requesting expedited processing.
    (2)(i) Requests and appeals will be given expedited treatment 
whenever it is determined that a requester has demonstrated compelling 
need by presenting:
    (A) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could 
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or 
physical safety of an individual; or
    (B) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged 
Federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in 
disseminating information.
    (ii) For example, a requester who is not a full-time member of the 
news media must establish that he or she is a person whose main 
professional activity or occupation is information dissemination, 
though it need not be his or her sole occupation. Such requester also 
must establish a particular urgency to inform the public about the 
government activity involved in the request, beyond the public's right 
to know about government activity generally, and that the information 
sought has particular value that would be lost if not disseminated 
quickly.
    (3) Within ten calendar days of receipt of a request for expedited 
processing, the NSF FOIA Officer or OIG component will decide whether 
to grant it, and will notify the requester of the decision orally or in 
writing. If a request

[[Page 53280]]

for expedited treatment is granted, the request will be processed as 
soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing is denied, 
any appeal of that decision will be acted on expeditiously.


Sec.  612.6  Responses to requests.

    (a) Acknowledgment of requests. The NSF or OIG will ordinarily send 
an email acknowledgment of all FOIA requests with an assigned request 
number for further reference and an estimated response date.
    (b) Grants of requests. Once the NSF makes a determination to grant 
a request in whole or in part, it will notify the requester in writing. 
The NSF will inform the requester in the notice of any applicable fee 
and will disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of 
applicable fees. Records disclosed in part will be marked or annotated 
to show both the amount and the location of the information deleted 
where practicable.
    (c) Denials of requests. (1) Denials of FOIA requests will be made 
by the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of the Inspector 
General, or such other office as may be designated by the Director. The 
response letter will briefly set forth the reasons for the denial, 
including any FOIA exemption(s) applied in denying the request. It will 
also provide the name and title or position of the person responsible 
for the denial, will inform the requester of the right to appeal, and 
will, where appropriate, include an estimate of the volume of any 
requested materials withheld. An estimate need not be provided when the 
volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in 
part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by 
an applicable exemption.
    (2) Requesters can appeal an agency determination to withhold all 
or part of any requested record; a determination that a requested 
record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that what 
has been requested is not a record subject to the Act; a disapproval of 
a fee category claim by a requester; denial of a fee waiver or 
reduction; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment (see Sec.  
612.9).


Sec.  612.7  Exemptions.

    (a) Exemptions from disclosure. The following types of records or 
information may be withholdable as exempt in full or in part from 
mandatory public disclosure:
    (1) Exemption 1--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1). Records specifically 
authorized and properly classified pursuant to Executive Order to be 
kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy. NSF 
does not have classifying authority and normally does not deal with 
classified materials.
    (2) Exemption 2--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2). Records related solely to the 
internal personnel rules and practices of NSF. Examples of records 
normally exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to: 
Information relating to position management and manpower utilization, 
such as internal staffing plans, authorizations or controls, or 
involved in determination of the qualifications of candidates for 
employment, advancement, or promotion including examination questions 
and answers.
    (3) Exemption 3--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Records specifically exempted 
from disclosure by another statute that either requires that the 
information be withheld in a such way that the agency has no discretion 
in the matter; or establishes particular criteria for withholding or 
refers to particular types of information to be withheld; and, if 
enacted after the date of enactment of the OPEN FOIA Act of 2009, 
October 28, 2009, specifically cites to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Examples of 
records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to:
    (i) Records that disclose any invention in which the Federal 
Government owns or may own a right, title, or interest (including a 
nonexclusive license), 35 U.S.C. 205;
    (ii) Contractor proposals not specifically set forth or 
incorporated by reference into a contract, 41 U.S.C. 253b(m);
    (iii) Information protected by the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 
U.S.C. 423;
    (iv) Statistical information protected by section 14(i) of the NSF 
Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1873(i) and/or the Confidential 
Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002, 44 
U.S.C. 3501 note.
    (4) Exemption 4--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). Trade secrets and commercial 
or financial information obtained from a person, and privileged or 
confidential. Information subject to this exemption is that customarily 
held in confidence by the originator(s), including nonprofit 
organizations and their employees. Release of such information is 
likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the 
originator or submitter, or impair the Foundation's ability to obtain 
such information in the future. NSF will process information 
potentially exempted from disclosure by Exemption 4 under Sec.  612.8.
    Examples of records or information normally exempt from disclosure 
include, but are not limited to:
    (i) Information received in confidence, such as grant applications, 
fellowship applications, and research proposals prior to award;
    (ii) Confidential scientific and manufacturing processes or 
developments, and technical, scientific, statistical data or other 
information developed by a grantee;
    (iii) Technical, scientific, or statistical data, and commercial or 
financial information privileged or received in confidence from an 
existing or potential contractor or subcontractor, in connection with 
bids, proposals, or contracts, concerning contract performance, income, 
profits, losses, and expenditures, as well as trade secrets, 
inventions, discoveries, or other proprietary data. When the provisions 
of 41 U.S.C. 253b(m) or 41 U.S.C. 423 are met, certain proprietary and 
source selection information may also be withheld under Exemption 3;
    (iv) Confidential proprietary information submitted on a voluntary 
basis;
    (v) Statements or information collected in the course of 
inspections, investigations, or audits, when such statements are 
received in confidence from the individual and retained in confidence 
because they reveal trade secrets or commercial or financial 
information normally considered confidential or privileged.
    (5) Exemption 5-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5). Inter-agency or intra-agency 
memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a private 
party in litigation with NSF. Factual material contained in such 
records will be considered for release if it can be reasonably 
segregated and is not otherwise exempt. Examples of records exempt from 
disclosure include, but are not limited to:
    (i) Those portions of reports, memoranda, correspondence, 
workpapers, minutes of meetings, and staff papers, containing 
evaluations, advice, opinions, suggestions, or other deliberative 
material that are prepared for use within NSF or within the Executive 
Branch of the Government by agency personnel and others acting in a 
consultant or advisory capacity;
    (ii) Advance information on proposed NSF plans to procure, lease, 
or otherwise acquire, or dispose of materials, real estate, facilities, 
services or functions, when such information would provide undue or 
unfair competitive advantage to private interests or impede legitimate 
government functions;
    (iii) Negotiating positions or limits at least until the execution 
of a contract (including a grant or cooperative agreement) or the 
completion of the

[[Page 53281]]

action to which the negotiating positions were applicable. They may 
also be exempt pursuant to other provisions of this section;
    (iv) Trade secret or other confidential research development, or 
commercial information owned by the Government, where premature release 
is likely to affect the Government's negotiating position or other 
commercial interest;
    (iv) Records prepared for use in proceedings before any Federal or 
State court or administrative body;
    (vi) Evaluations of and comments on specific grant applications, 
research projects or proposals, fellowship applications or nominations 
or other individual awards, or potential contractors and their 
products, whether made by NSF personnel or by external reviewers acting 
either individually or in panels, committees or similar groups;
    (vii) Preliminary, draft or unapproved documents, such as opinions, 
recommendations, evaluations, decisions, or studies conducted or 
supported by NSF;
    (viii) Proposed budget requests, and supporting projections used or 
arising in the preparation and/or execution of a budget; proposed 
annual and multi-year policy, priorities, program and financial plan 
and supporting papers;
    (ix) Those portions of official reports of inspection, reports of 
the Inspector General, audits, investigations, or surveys pertaining to 
safety, security, or the internal management, administration, or 
operation of NSF, when these records have traditionally been treated by 
the courts as privileged against disclosure in litigation.
    (6) Exemption 6-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). Personnel and medical files and 
similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The exemption may apply to 
protect the privacy of living persons and of living close survivors of 
a deceased person identified in a record. Information in such files 
which is not otherwise exempt from disclosure pursuant to other 
provisions of this section will be released to the subject or to his 
designated legal representative, and may be disclosed to others with 
the subject's written consent. Examples of records exempt from 
disclosure include, but are not limited to:
    (i) Reports, records, and other materials pertaining to individual 
cases in which disciplinary or other administrative action has been or 
may be taken. Opinions and orders resulting from those administrative 
or disciplinary proceedings shall be disclosed without identifying 
details if used, cited, or relied upon as precedent;
    (ii) Records compiled to evaluate or adjudicate the suitability of 
candidates for employment, and the eligibility of individuals (civilian 
or contractor employees) for security clearances, or for access to 
classified information;
    (iii) Reports and evaluations which reflect upon the qualifications 
or competence of individuals;
    (iv) Personal information such as home addresses and telephone and 
facsimile numbers, private email addresses, social security numbers, 
dates of birth, marital status and the like;
    (v) The exemption also applies when the fact of the existence or 
nonexistence of a responsive record would itself reveal personal, 
private information, and the public interest in disclosure is not 
sufficient to outweigh the privacy interest.
    (7) Exemption 7-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7). Records or information compiled 
for civil or criminal law enforcement purposes, including the 
implementation of Executive Orders or regulations issued pursuant to 
law. This exemption may exempt from mandatory disclosure records not 
originally created, but later gathered, for law enforcement purposes.
    (i) This exemption applies only to the extent that the production 
of such law enforcement records or information:
    (A) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement 
proceedings;
    (B) Would deprive a person of the right to a fair trial or an 
impartial adjudication;
    (C) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy of a living person, or living close 
survivors of a deceased person identified in a record;
    (D) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a 
confidential source, including a source within the Federal Government, 
or a State, local, or foreign agency or authority, or any private 
institution, that furnished information on a confidential basis; and 
information furnished by a confidential source and obtained by a 
criminal law enforcement authority in a criminal investigation;
    (E) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement 
investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law 
enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could 
reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or
    (F) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical 
safety of any individual.
    (ii) Examples of records normally exempt from disclosure include, 
but are not limited to:
    (A) The identity and statements of complainants or witnesses, or 
other material developed during the course of an investigation and all 
materials prepared in connection with related government litigation or 
adjudicative proceedings;
    (B) The identity of firms or individuals investigated for alleged 
irregularities involving NSF grants, contracts or other matters when no 
indictment has been obtained, no civil action has been filed against 
them by the United States, or no government-wide public suspension or 
debarment has occurred;
    (C) Information obtained in confidence, expressed or implied, in 
the course of a criminal investigation by the NSF Office of the 
Inspector General.
    (iii) The exclusions contained in 5 U.S.C. 552(c)(1) and (2) may 
also apply to these records.
    (8) Exemption 8-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8). Records contained in or related 
to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf 
of, or for the use of any agency responsible for the regulation or 
supervision of financial institutions.
    (9) Exemption 9-5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9). Records containing geological 
and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
    (b) Deletion of exempt portions and identifying details. Any 
reasonably segregable portion of a record will be provided to 
requesters after deletion of the portions which are exempt. Whenever 
any final opinion, order, or other materials required to be made 
available relates to a private party or parties and the release of the 
name(s) or other identifying details will constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the record shall be published 
or made available with such identifying details left blank, or shall be 
published or made available with obviously fictitious substitutes and 
with a notification such as the following: Names of parties and certain 
other identifying details have been removed (and fictitious names 
substituted) in order to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of the 
personal privacy of the individuals involved.


Sec.  612.8  Business information.

    (a) In general. Business information obtained by the Foundation 
from a submitter of that information will be disclosed under the FOIA 
only under this section's procedures.
    (b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
    (1) Business Information means commercial or financial information 
obtained by the Foundation from a

[[Page 53282]]

submitter that may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of 
the FOIA and Sec.  612.7(a)(4).
    (2) Submitter means any person or entity from whom the Foundation 
obtains business information, directly or indirectly. The term includes 
corporations; state, local, and tribal governments; and foreign 
governments.
    (c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business 
information must use good faith efforts to designate, by appropriate 
markings, either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time 
thereafter, any portions of its submission that it considers to be 
protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. These designations will 
expire ten years after the date of the submission unless the submitter 
requests, and provides justification for, a longer designation period.
    (d) Notice to submitters. The Foundation will provide a submitter 
with prompt written notice of a FOIA request or administrative appeal 
that seeks its business information wherever required under this 
section, in order to give the submitter an opportunity to object to 
disclosure of any specified portion of that information under paragraph 
(f) of this section. The notice shall either describe the business 
information requested or include copies of the requested records or 
record portions containing the information.
    (e) Where notice is required. Notice will be given to a submitter 
wherever:
    (1) The information has been designated in good faith by the 
submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under 
Exemption 4; or
    (2) The Foundation has reason to believe that the information may 
be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4.
    (f) Opportunity to object to disclosure. NSF will allow a submitter 
a reasonable time, consistent with statutory requirements, to respond 
to the notice described in paragraph (d) of this section. If a 
submitter has any objection to disclosure, it must submit a detailed 
written statement. The statement must specify all grounds for 
withholding any portion of the information under any exemption of the 
FOIA and, in the case of Exemption 4, must show why the information is 
a trade secret, or commercial or financial information that is 
privileged or confidential. In the event that a submitter fails to 
respond within the time specified in the notice, the submitter will be 
considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information. 
Information provided by a submitter under this paragraph may itself be 
a record subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
    (g) Notice of intent to disclose. The Foundation will consider a 
submitter's objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in 
deciding whether to disclose business information. Whenever it decides 
to disclose business information over the objection of a submitter, the 
Foundation will give the submitter written notice, which will include:
    (1) A statement of the reason(s) why the submitter's disclosure 
objections were not sustained;
    (2) A description of the business information to be disclosed; and
    (3) A specified disclosure date, which will be a reasonable time 
subsequent to the notice.
    (h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of 
paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section will not apply if:
    (1) The Foundation determines that the information should not be 
disclosed (the Foundation protects from disclosure to third parties 
information about specific unfunded applications, including pending, 
withdrawn, or declined proposals);
    (2) The information lawfully has been published or has been 
officially made available to the public;
    (3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other 
than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the 
requirements of Executive Order 12600 (3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 235); or
    (4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of 
this section appears obviously frivolous, in which case the Foundation 
will, within a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure date, 
give the submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the 
information.
    (i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit 
seeking to compel the disclosure of business information, the 
Foundation will promptly notify the submitter(s). Whenever a submitter 
files a lawsuit seeking to prevent the disclosure of business 
information, the Foundation will notify the requester(s).


Sec.  612.9  Appeals.

    (a) Appeals of denials. You may appeal a denial of your request to 
the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You must make your appeal 
in writing and it must be received by the Office of the General Counsel 
within ten days of the receipt of the denial (weekends, legal holidays, 
and the date of receipt excluded). You must clearly mark your appeal 
letter and the envelope or your electronic submission as a ``Freedom of 
Information Act Appeal.'' Your appeal letter must include a copy of 
your written request and the denial together with any written argument 
you wish to submit.
    (b) Responses to appeals. A written decision on your appeal will be 
made by the General Counsel. A decision affirming an adverse 
determination in whole or in part will contain a statement of the 
reason(s) for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied, 
and will inform you of the FOIA provisions for court review of the 
decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on 
appeal, in whole or in part, you will be notified in a written decision 
and your request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal 
decision.
    (c) When appeal is required. If you wish to seek review by a court 
of any denial, you must first appeal it under this section.


Sec.  612.10  Fees

    (a) In general. NSF will charge for processing requests under the 
FOIA in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, except where 
fees are limited under paragraph (d) of this section or where a waiver 
or reduction of fees is granted under paragraph (k) of this section. If 
fees are applicable, NSF will itemize the amounts charged. NSF may 
collect all applicable fees before sending copies of requested records 
to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check or money order made 
payable to the Treasury of the United States.
    (b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
    (1) Commercial use request means a request from or on behalf of a 
person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers his or 
her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can include 
furthering those interests through litigation. When it appears that the 
requester will put the records to a commercial use, either because of 
the nature of the request itself or because NSF has reasonable cause to 
doubt a requester's stated use, NSF will provide the requester a 
reasonable opportunity to submit further clarification.
    (2) Direct costs means those expenses that an agency actually 
incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial 
use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct 
costs include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the 
work (the basic rate of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of

[[Page 53283]]

that rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating duplication 
machinery. Not included in direct costs are overhead expenses such as 
the costs of space and heating or lighting of the facility in which the 
records are kept.
    (3) Duplication means the making of a copy of a record, or of the 
information contained in it, necessary to respond to a FOIA request. 
Copies can take the form of paper, microform, audiovisual materials, or 
electronic records (for example, magnetic tape or compact disk) among 
others. NSF will honor a requester's specified preference of form or 
format of disclosure if the record is readily reproducible by NSF, with 
reasonable effort, in the requested form or format.
    (4) Educational institution means a preschool, a public or private 
elementary or secondary school, an institution of undergraduate higher 
education, an institution of graduate higher education, an institution 
of professional education, or an institution of vocational education 
that operates a program of scholarly research. To be in this category, 
a requester must show that the request is authorized by and made under 
the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the records are not 
sought for a commercial use, but are sought to further scholarly 
research.
    (5) Noncommercial scientific institution means an institution that 
is not operated on a ``commercial'' basis, as that term is defined in 
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that is operated solely for the 
purpose of conducting scientific research, the results of which are not 
intended to promote any particular product or industry. To be in this 
category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by and 
made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the 
records are not sought for a commercial use or to promote any 
particular product or industry, but are sought to further scientific 
research.
    (6) Representative of the news media or news media requester means 
any person actively gathering news for an entity that is organized and 
operated to publish or broadcast news to the public. The term news 
means information that is about current events or that would be of 
current interest to the public. Examples of news media entities include 
television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and 
publishers of periodicals (but only in those instances where they can 
qualify as disseminators of ``news'') who make their products available 
for purchase or subscription by the general public. For ``freelance'' 
journalists to be regarded as working for a news organization, they 
must demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that 
organization. A publication contract would be the clearest proof, but 
NSF shall also look to the past publication record of a requester in 
making this determination. To be in this category, a requester must not 
be seeking the requested records for a commercial use. However, a 
request for records supporting the news dissemination function of the 
requester will not be considered to be for a commercial use.
    (7) Review means the examination of a record located in response to 
a request in order to determine whether any portion of it is exempt 
from disclosure. It also includes processing any record for disclosure, 
for example, doing all that is necessary to redact it and prepare it 
for disclosure. Review costs are recoverable even if a record 
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time includes time spent 
considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a business 
submitter under Sec.  612.8, but does not include time spent resolving 
general legal or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.
    (8) Search means the process of looking for and retrieving records 
or information responsive to a request. It includes page by page or 
line by line identification of information within records and also 
includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information from 
records maintained in paper or electronic form or format, or stored in 
Federal Records Centers. NSF will ensure that searches are done in the 
most efficient and least expensive manner reasonably possible. For 
example, NSF will not search line by line where duplicating an entire 
document would be quicker and less expensive.
    (c) Fees. In responding to FOIA requests, NSF will charge the 
following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been granted 
under paragraph (k) of this section:
    (1) Search. (i) Search fees will be charged for all requests, other 
than requests made by educational institutions, noncommercial 
scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media, subject 
to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. NSF may charge for 
time spent searching even if responsive records are not located or are 
withheld entirely as exempt from disclosure.
    (ii) Manual searches for records. Whenever feasible, NSF will 
charge at the salary rate(s) (i.e., basic pay plus 16 percent) of the 
employee(s) conducting the search. Where a homogeneous class of 
personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all administrative/clerical or all 
professional/executive), NSF has established an average rate for the 
range of grades typically involved. Routine search for records by 
administrative personnel are charged at $5.50 for each quarter hour. 
When a non-routine, non-clerical search by professional personnel is 
conducted (for example, where the task of determining which records 
fall within a request requires professional time) the charge is $11.50 
for each quarter hour.
    (iii) Computer searches of records. NSF will charge at the actual 
direct cost of conducting the search. This will include the cost of 
operating the computer system(s) for that portion of operating time 
that is directly attributable to searching for records responsive to a 
FOIA request and operator/programmer salary (i.e., basic pay plus 16 
percent) apportionable to the search. When NSF can establish a 
reasonable agency-wide average rate for computer operating costs and 
operator/programmer salaries involved in FOIA searches, the Foundation 
will do so and charge accordingly.
    (iv) Archived records. For requests that require the retrieval of 
records stored by NSF at a Federal records center operated by the 
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), additional costs 
will be charged in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate 
Schedule established by NARA.
    (2) Duplication. Duplication fees will be charged to all 
requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this 
section. For a paper photocopy of a record (no more than one copy of 
which need be supplied), the fee will be ten cents per page. For copies 
produced by computer, such as print outs, tapes, compact disks, or 
other electronic media, NSF will charge the direct costs, including 
operator time, of producing the copy. Where paper documents must be 
scanned in order to comply with a requester's preference to receive the 
records in an electronic format, the requester shall pay the direct 
costs associated with scanning those materials. For other forms of 
duplication, NSF will charge the direct costs of that duplication.
    (3) Review. Review fees will be charged to requesters who make a 
commercial use request. Review fees will be charged only for the 
initial record review, in other words, the review done when NSF 
determines whether an exemption applies to a particular record or 
record portion at the initial request level. NSF may charge for review 
even if a record ultimately is not disclosed. No charge will be made 
for review at the administrative appeal

[[Page 53284]]

level for an exemption already applied. However, records or record 
portions withheld under an exemption that is subsequently determined 
not to apply may be reviewed again to determine whether any other 
exemption not previously considered applies; the costs of that review 
are chargeable where it is made necessary by a change of circumstances. 
Review fees will be charged at the salary rate (basic pay plus 16%) of 
the employee(s) performing the review.
    (d) Limitations on charging fees. (1) No search fee will be charged 
for requests by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific 
institutions, or representatives of the news media. (2) Except for 
requesters seeking records for a commercial use, NSF will provide 
without charge:
    (i) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent); 
and
    (ii) The first two hours of search (or the cost equivalent).
    (3) Whenever a total fee calculated under paragraph (c) of this 
section is $25.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged.
    (4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this section 
work together. This means that noncommercial requesters will be charged 
no fees unless the cost of search in excess of two hours plus the cost 
of duplication in excess of 100 pages totals more than $25.00. 
Commercial requesters will not be charged unless the costs of search, 
review, and duplication total more than $25.00.
    (e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $25.00. When NSF 
determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section 
will exceed $25.00, it will notify the requester of the actual or 
estimated amount of the fees, unless the requester has indicated a 
willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion 
of the fee can be estimated readily, NSF will advise the requester that 
the estimated fee may be only a portion of the total fee. In cases in 
which a requester has been notified that actual or estimated fees 
exceed $25.00, the request will not be considered perfected and further 
work will not be done until the requester agrees to pay the anticipated 
total fee. Any such agreement should be memorialized in writing. A 
notice under this paragraph will offer the requester an opportunity to 
discuss the matter with Foundation personnel in order to reformulate 
the request to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost, if possible. 
If a requester fails to respond within 60 days of notice of actual or 
estimated fees with an agreement to pay those fees, NSF may 
administratively close the request.
    (f) Charges for other services. Apart from the other provisions of 
this section, when NSF chooses as a matter of administrative discretion 
to provide a requested special service such as certifying that records 
are true copies or sending them by other than ordinary mail, the direct 
costs of providing the service will be charged to the requester.
    (g) Charging interest. NSF may charge interest on any unpaid bill 
starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the requester. 
Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C. 
3717 and will accrue from the date of the billing until payment is 
received by NSF. NSF may follow the provisions of the Debt Collection 
Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended, and its 
administrative procedures, including the use of consumer reporting 
agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
    (h) Aggregating requests. Where NSF reasonably believes that a 
requester or a group of requesters acting together is attempting to 
divide a request into a series of requests for the purpose of avoiding 
fees, the agency may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly. 
NSF may presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30-
day period have been made in order to avoid fees. Where requests are 
separated by a longer period, NSF will aggregate them only where there 
exists a solid basis for determining that aggregation is warranted 
under all the circumstances involved. Multiple requests involving 
unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
    (i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described 
in paragraphs (i) (2) and (3) of this section, NSF will not require the 
requester to make an advance payment, -in other words, a payment made 
before work is begun or continued on a request. Payment owed for work 
already completed (i.e., a prepayment before copies are sent to a 
requester) is not an advance payment.
    (2) Where NSF determines or estimates that a total fee to be 
charged under this section will be more than $250.00, it may require 
the requester to make an advance payment of an amount up to the amount 
of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request, 
except where it receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from 
a requester that has a history of prompt payment.
    (3) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly 
charged fee to any agency within 30 days of the date of billing, NSF 
may require the requester to pay the full amount due, plus any 
applicable interest, and to make an advance payment of the full amount 
of any anticipated fee, before NSF begins to process a new request or 
continues to process a pending request from that requester.
    (4) In cases in which NSF requires advance payment or payment due 
under paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the request will not be 
considered perfected and further work will not be done on it until the 
required payment is received.
    (j) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee 
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any 
statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees 
for particular types of records. Where records responsive to requests 
are maintained for distribution by agencies operating such statutorily 
based fee schedule programs, NSF will inform requesters of the steps 
for obtaining records from those sources so that they may do so most 
economically.
    (k) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive to a 
request will be furnished without charge or at a charge reduced below 
that established under paragraph (c) of this section where NSF 
determines, based on all available information, that disclosure of the 
requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to 
contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or 
activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial 
interest of the requester.
    (2) To determine whether the first fee waiver requirement is met, 
NSF will consider the following factors:
    (i) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the 
requested records concerns ``the operations or activities of the 
government.'' The subject of the requested records must concern 
identifiable operations or activities of the federal government, with a 
connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
    (ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed: 
Whether disclosure is ``likely to contribute'' to an understanding of 
government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the 
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government 
operations or activities in order to be ``likely to contribute'' to an 
increased public understanding of those operations or activities. 
Disclosure of information already in the public domain, in either 
duplicative or substantially identical form, is unlikely to contribute 
to such understanding where nothing new would be added to the public's 
understanding.
    (iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the

[[Page 53285]]

public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the 
requested information will contribute to ``public understanding.'' The 
disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad 
audience of persons interested in the subject as opposed to the 
individual understanding of the requester. A requester's expertise in 
the subject area and ability and intention to effectively convey 
information to the public will be considered. A representative of the 
news media as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section will normally 
be presumed to satisfy this consideration.
    (iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding: 
Whether disclosure is likely to contribute ``significantly'' to public 
understanding of government operations or activities. The public's 
understanding of the subject in question must be enhanced by the 
disclosure to a significant extent as compared to the level of public 
understanding existing prior to the disclosure. NSF will make no value 
judgments about whether information that would contribute significantly 
to public understanding of the operations or activities of the 
government is ``important'' enough to be made public.
    (3) To determine whether the second fee waiver requirement is met, 
NSF will consider the following factors:
    (i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether 
the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the 
requested disclosure. NSF will consider any commercial interest of the 
requester (with reference to the definition of ``commercial use'' in 
paragraph (b)(1) of this section), or of any person on whose behalf the 
requester may be acting, that would be furthered by the requested 
disclosure. Requesters will be given an opportunity in the 
administrative process to provide explanatory information regarding 
this consideration.
    (ii) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether any identified 
commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in 
comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is 
``primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.'' A fee waiver 
or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is 
satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of 
any identified commercial interest in disclosure. NSF ordinarily will 
presume that where a news media requester has satisfied the public 
interest standard, the public interest will be the interest primarily 
served by disclosure to that requester. Disclosure to data brokers or 
others who merely compile and market government information for direct 
economic return will not be presumed to primarily serve the public 
interest.
    (4) Where only some of the requested records satisfy the 
requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted for those 
records.
    (5) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees should address the 
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3) of this section, insofar as 
they apply to each request.


Sec.  612.11  Other rights and services.

    Nothing in this part will be construed to entitle any person, as of 
right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such 
person is not entitled under the FOIA.

    Dated: August 23, 2013.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-21053 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.