Establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes; Washington, DC, 53237-53239 [2013-21004]
Download as PDF
53237
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 168
Thursday, August 29, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0808; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–170–AD; Amendment
39–17380; AD 2013–05–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The FAA is correcting
airworthiness directive (AD) 2013–05–
08 that published in the Federal
Register. AD 2013–05–08 applies to all
Airbus Model A330–200 and A330–300
series airplanes, and Model A340–200
and A340–300 series airplanes. Two
paragraphs of AD 2013–05–08
incorrectly specify flight control
secondary computers (FCSCs), rather
than flight control primary computers
(FCPCs). This document corrects those
errors. In all other respects, the original
document remains the same.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
29, 2013. The effective date for AD
2013–05–08, Amendment 39–17380 (78
FR 27015, May 9, 2013), remains June
13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–05–
08, Amendment 39–17380 (78 FR
27015, May 9, 2013), currently requires,
depending on airplane configuration,
modifying three flight control primary
computers (FCPCs); modifying two
flight control secondary computers
(FCSCs); revising the airplane flight
manual (AFM) to include certain
information; replacing certain O-rings;
and checking part number and replacing
certain O-ring seals if needed.
As published, AD 2013–05–08,
Amendment 39–17380 (78 FR 27015,
May 9, 2013), currently includes
typographical errors in paragraphs (p)(4)
and (p)(5) of the AD, which specify
FCSCs, instead of flight control primary
computers FCPCs.
No other part of the preamble or
regulatory information has been
changed; therefore, only the changed
portion of the final rule is being
published in the Federal Register.
The effective date of AD 2013–05–08,
Amendment 39–17380 (78 FR 27015,
May 9, 2013), remains June 13, 2013.
Correction of Regulatory Text
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
In the Federal Register of May 9,
2013, on page 27019, in the third
column, paragraphs (p)(4) and (p)(5) of
AD 2013–05–08, Amendment 39–17380
(78 FR 27015, May 9, 2013), are
corrected to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(4) This paragraph provides credit for
modification or replacement of the
FCPCs specified in paragraph (o)(1) of
this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–27–3176, dated July 26, 2011; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–27–3176, Revision 01, dated
March 27, 2012 (for Model A330
airplanes).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) This paragraph provides credit for
modification or replacement of the
■
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FCPCs specified in paragraph (o)(4) of
this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–27–4162, dated January 10, 2012
(for Model A340 airplanes).
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
21, 2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–21078 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0339; Airspace
Docket No. 12–AEA–15]
RIN 2120–AA66
Establishment of Area Navigation
(RNAV) Routes; Washington, DC
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action establishes two
new low-altitude RNAV routes,
designated T–287 and T–299, to
enhance the flow of air traffic to the
west of the Washington-Dulles
International Airport. Also, there is a
name change to one of the navigation
fixes; an adjustment to the coordinates
of another navigation fix, and a change
from a waypoint to a fix for a navigation
point.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, October
17, 2013. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
History
On April 29, 2013, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
53238
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
establish two new RNAV routes in the
Washington, DC area (82 FR 25006).
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal. One comment was received.
Discussion of Comments
The Aircraft Owners and Pilots
Association (AOPA) commented that
they do not support the establishment of
T–287 and T–299 and advocated that
the FAA withdraw the proposal. AOPA
contended that aircraft already are able
to circumnavigate the WashingtonDulles (IAD) arrival flows by using
existing Victor airways; thus, pilots will
avoid use of the proposed T-routes
because they are inefficient and lack
benefit.
T–287 and T–299 were developed to
allow aircraft to navigate via routes that
are procedurally separated from the
NextGen Optimized Profile Descent
arrival procedures in the IAD area.
While the new routes may result in
more track miles flown as compared to
nearby V–143, it should be noted that,
during busy periods, Air Traffic Control
vectors aircraft on V–143 vectored off
the airway to the west very near the
tracks of the new T-routes. Aircraft filed
via V–377 will fly a shorter distance and
more direct routing with the new routes.
T–287 and T–299 allow for unrestricted
optimized profile descents into the IAD
area. The routes were not designed to
push traffic farther away from Class B
airspace, but to provide additional
options for pilots and air traffic
controllers alike during weather and
high volume traffic periods. Since they
mimic the tracks already used for
vectoring aircraft, the T-routes provide
more consistent, predicable and precise
routing. The FAA believes that these
routes do benefit both pilots and air
traffic controllers.
AOPA further contended that T-routes
must be established within Class B
airspace to retain an equivalent level of
service and access for general aviation.
AOPA asserted that, if future T-route
development is limited to locations
significantly outside the boundaries of
Class B airspace, general aviation will
loose the limited access it currently has.
Originally, T-routes were developed
to serve as ‘‘Area Navigation IFR
Terminal Transition Routes (RITTR).’’
RITTRs were intended to provide more
direct routing and expedite movement
of aircraft around or through congested
terminal airspace areas (such as Class B
airspace) using RNAV capabilities. In
2007 the FAA decided to discontinue
the use of the term ‘‘RITTR’’ in favor of
applying the ‘‘T-route’’ designator to all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
published RNAV routes below 18,000
feet MSL, whether their purpose is to
provide more direct access through
terminal airspace (such as Class B) or as
part of the low altitude en route
structure. This change does not alter the
fact that T-routes may still be
established specifically to enable transit
through Class B airspace areas.
AOPA criticized the Washington DC
‘‘Optimization of Airspace and
Procedures in a Metroplex (OAPM)’’
effort in that this rule did not include
T-routes through the Washington TriArea Class B airspace area. AOPA
suggested another location for a T-route
through the Washington Class B
airspace area.
This rule represents just one part of
the DC OAPM effort. While a separate
DC OAPM rulemaking action included
the establishment of two T-routes (T–
291 and T–295) through the east side of
the Washington Tri-Area Class B
airspace (78 FR 37104, June 20, 2013),
establishing T-routes through the Class
B airspace is outside the scope of this
specific rule. The Washington Tri-Area
Class B area is currently under review
for possible modification in the future.
An Ad Hoc Committee was formed to
recommend possible Class B changes to
the FAA. The FAA is reviewing the
Committee’s recommendations and will
initiate further public participation at a
later date. The issue of access through
the Class B will be considered as part of
that effort. It should be noted that any
future DC Class B modifications will be
influenced by the requirements of the
‘‘Washington, DC Metropolitan Area
Special Flight Rules Area (14 CFR part
93, subpart V).’’
Differences From the NPRM
This rule corrects an error in the
header line of the legal description of
RNAV route T–287, as published in the
NPRM, by removing the abbreviation
‘‘(GVE).’’ GVE was mistakenly inserted
in the NPRM and is not a part of the T–
287 description. The coordinates for the
WILMY waypoint in T–287 were
adjusted slightly along the track to
facilitate a more optimum minimum en
route altitude. This rule also changes
the name of the ‘‘HAANK’’ waypoint in
T–299 to ‘‘UCREK.’’ After the NPRM
was published, it was found that the
name ‘‘HAANK’’ was unavailable. The
latitude/longitude coordinates for
UCREK are the same as were listed for
HAANK in the NPRM. Also in T–299,
the ‘‘SCAPE’’ navigation point is
changed from a ‘‘waypoint’’ to a ‘‘fix.’’
Except for these corrections and
editorial changes, this rule is the same
as published in the NPRM.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
to establish two new RNAV routes (T–
287 and T–299) west of the WashingtonDulles International Airport (IAD) area.
The new routes support the
Washington, DC Optimization of
Airspace and Procedures in a Metroplex
(OAPM) project and enable aircraft to
circumnavigate IAD arrival flows.
Aircraft transiting through the
Washington, DC area are routinely
vectored to the west of the IAD area in
order to separate them from the major
arrival flows into the IAD area. T–287
and T–299 are designed to mimic the
flight paths currently used for vectoring
these transiting aircraft. The routes
provide consistent and predictable
routing for aircraft to file and navigate
while being assured of separation from
larger turbojet aircraft entering and
exiting the Washington, DC area.
Further, the routes reduce air traffic
controller workload and enhance
efficiency within the National Airspace
System.
Low altitude RNAV routes are
published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9W dated August 8, 2012,
and effective September 15, 2012, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The RNAV routes listed in this
document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it establishes
RNAV routes to as required to preserve
the safe and efficient flow of air traffic
in the Washington, DC area.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6011 United States Area
Navigation Routes
*
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0504; Airspace
Docket No. 13–AEA–3]
RIN 2120–AA66
Establishment, Modification and
Cancellation of Air Traffic Service
(ATS) Routes; Northeast United States
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
This action modifies two jet
routes, six VOR Federal airways, and
three area navigation routes; establishes
six area navigation (RNAV) routes; and
cancels two VOR Federal airways in the
northeast United States. This action is
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:38 Aug 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
38°05′06″ N., long. 078°12′28″ W.)
38°19′40″ N., long. 078°23′37″ W.)
38°32′30″ N., long. 078°33′32″ W.)
38°44′35″ N., long. 078°42′48″ W.)
39°24′33″ N., long. 078°25′46″ W.)
39°47′52″ N., long. 077°45′56″ W.)
39°40′ 52″ N., long. 077°08′26″ W.)
T–299 UCREK, VA to SCAPE, PA [New]
UCREK, VA
WP
(Lat. 38°01′33″ N., long. 079°02′56″
KAIJE, VA
WP
(Lat. 38°44′35″ N., long. 078°42′48″
BAMMY, WV
WP
(Lat. 39°24′33″ N., long. 078°25′46″
REEES, PA
WP
(Lat. 39°47′52″ N., long. 077°45′56″
SCAPE, PA
Fix
(Lat. 39°56′42″ N., long. 077°32′12″
[FR Doc. 2013–21004 Filed 8–28–13; 8:45 am]
[Amended]
■
T–287 DENNN, VA to TOMYD, MD [New]
DENNN, VA
WP
(Lat.
CAARY, VA
WP
(Lat.
WILMY, VA
WP
(Lat.
KAIJE, VA
WP
(Lat.
BAMMY, WV
WP
(Lat.
REEES, PA
WP
(Lat.
TOMYD, MD
WP
(Lat.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 21,
2013.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group.
53239
necessary due to the decommissioning
of the Lake Henry, PA, VHF
Omnidirectional Range/Tactical Air
Navigation (VORTAC) facility which
provides navigation guidance for
portions of the affected routes. This
action enhances the safe and efficient
management of aircraft within the
National Airspace System.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, October
17, 2013. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
The FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend two jet
routes, six VOR Federal airways, and
three area navigation routes; establish
six area navigation (RNAV) routes; and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
cancel two VOR Federal airways in the
northeast United States (78 FR 38236,
June 26, 2013). Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal. One comment was
received. The Aircraft Owners and
Pilots Association (AOPA) did not
oppose the modifications but
encouraged the FAA to utilize
stakeholders in developing an air traffic
service route modernization plan.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
modifying jet routes J–36 and J–68; VOR
Federal airways V–58, V–93, V–106, V–
126, V–149, V–408; and RNAV routes
T–212, T–291 and T–295. This action
also establishes new RNAV routes Q–
436, Q–438, Q–440, T–216, T–218 and
T–221. In addition, VOR Federal
airways V–153 and V–449 are cancelled.
The decommissioning of the Lake Henry
VORTAC (LHY) facility has made this
action necessary.
The specific route changes are
outlined below.
J–36: J–36 is amended by eliminating
the segment of the route between Flint,
MI (FNT) and Sparta, NJ (SAX). A new
E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM
29AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53237-53239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0339; Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-15]
RIN 2120-AA66
Establishment of Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes; Washington, DC
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action establishes two new low-altitude RNAV routes,
designated T-287 and T-299, to enhance the flow of air traffic to the
west of the Washington-Dulles International Airport. Also, there is a
name change to one of the navigation fixes; an adjustment to the
coordinates of another navigation fix, and a change from a waypoint to
a fix for a navigation point.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, October 17, 2013. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On April 29, 2013, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of
[[Page 53238]]
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish two new RNAV routes in the
Washington, DC area (82 FR 25006). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal. One comment was received.
Discussion of Comments
The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) commented that
they do not support the establishment of T-287 and T-299 and advocated
that the FAA withdraw the proposal. AOPA contended that aircraft
already are able to circumnavigate the Washington-Dulles (IAD) arrival
flows by using existing Victor airways; thus, pilots will avoid use of
the proposed T-routes because they are inefficient and lack benefit.
T-287 and T-299 were developed to allow aircraft to navigate via
routes that are procedurally separated from the NextGen Optimized
Profile Descent arrival procedures in the IAD area. While the new
routes may result in more track miles flown as compared to nearby V-
143, it should be noted that, during busy periods, Air Traffic Control
vectors aircraft on V-143 vectored off the airway to the west very near
the tracks of the new T-routes. Aircraft filed via V-377 will fly a
shorter distance and more direct routing with the new routes. T-287 and
T-299 allow for unrestricted optimized profile descents into the IAD
area. The routes were not designed to push traffic farther away from
Class B airspace, but to provide additional options for pilots and air
traffic controllers alike during weather and high volume traffic
periods. Since they mimic the tracks already used for vectoring
aircraft, the T-routes provide more consistent, predicable and precise
routing. The FAA believes that these routes do benefit both pilots and
air traffic controllers.
AOPA further contended that T-routes must be established within
Class B airspace to retain an equivalent level of service and access
for general aviation. AOPA asserted that, if future T-route development
is limited to locations significantly outside the boundaries of Class B
airspace, general aviation will loose the limited access it currently
has.
Originally, T-routes were developed to serve as ``Area Navigation
IFR Terminal Transition Routes (RITTR).'' RITTRs were intended to
provide more direct routing and expedite movement of aircraft around or
through congested terminal airspace areas (such as Class B airspace)
using RNAV capabilities. In 2007 the FAA decided to discontinue the use
of the term ``RITTR'' in favor of applying the ``T-route'' designator
to all published RNAV routes below 18,000 feet MSL, whether their
purpose is to provide more direct access through terminal airspace
(such as Class B) or as part of the low altitude en route structure.
This change does not alter the fact that T-routes may still be
established specifically to enable transit through Class B airspace
areas.
AOPA criticized the Washington DC ``Optimization of Airspace and
Procedures in a Metroplex (OAPM)'' effort in that this rule did not
include T-routes through the Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace area.
AOPA suggested another location for a T-route through the Washington
Class B airspace area.
This rule represents just one part of the DC OAPM effort. While a
separate DC OAPM rulemaking action included the establishment of two T-
routes (T-291 and T-295) through the east side of the Washington Tri-
Area Class B airspace (78 FR 37104, June 20, 2013), establishing T-
routes through the Class B airspace is outside the scope of this
specific rule. The Washington Tri-Area Class B area is currently under
review for possible modification in the future. An Ad Hoc Committee was
formed to recommend possible Class B changes to the FAA. The FAA is
reviewing the Committee's recommendations and will initiate further
public participation at a later date. The issue of access through the
Class B will be considered as part of that effort. It should be noted
that any future DC Class B modifications will be influenced by the
requirements of the ``Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight
Rules Area (14 CFR part 93, subpart V).''
Differences From the NPRM
This rule corrects an error in the header line of the legal
description of RNAV route T-287, as published in the NPRM, by removing
the abbreviation ``(GVE).'' GVE was mistakenly inserted in the NPRM and
is not a part of the T-287 description. The coordinates for the WILMY
waypoint in T-287 were adjusted slightly along the track to facilitate
a more optimum minimum en route altitude. This rule also changes the
name of the ``HAANK'' waypoint in T-299 to ``UCREK.'' After the NPRM
was published, it was found that the name ``HAANK'' was unavailable.
The latitude/longitude coordinates for UCREK are the same as were
listed for HAANK in the NPRM. Also in T-299, the ``SCAPE'' navigation
point is changed from a ``waypoint'' to a ``fix.'' Except for these
corrections and editorial changes, this rule is the same as published
in the NPRM.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to establish two new RNAV routes (T-287 and T-299) west of the
Washington-Dulles International Airport (IAD) area. The new routes
support the Washington, DC Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in a
Metroplex (OAPM) project and enable aircraft to circumnavigate IAD
arrival flows. Aircraft transiting through the Washington, DC area are
routinely vectored to the west of the IAD area in order to separate
them from the major arrival flows into the IAD area. T-287 and T-299
are designed to mimic the flight paths currently used for vectoring
these transiting aircraft. The routes provide consistent and
predictable routing for aircraft to file and navigate while being
assured of separation from larger turbojet aircraft entering and
exiting the Washington, DC area. Further, the routes reduce air traffic
controller workload and enhance efficiency within the National Airspace
System.
Low altitude RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9W dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV routes
listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A,
[[Page 53239]]
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes RNAV
routes to as required to preserve the safe and efficient flow of air
traffic in the Washington, DC area.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes
* * * * *
T-287 DENNN, VA to TOMYD, MD [New]
DENNN, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]05'06'' N., long. 078[deg]12'28'' W.)
CAARY, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]19'40'' N., long. 078[deg]23'37'' W.)
WILMY, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]32'30'' N., long. 078[deg]33'32'' W.)
KAIJE, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]44'35'' N., long. 078[deg]42'48'' W.)
BAMMY, WV WP (Lat. 39[deg]24'33'' N., long. 078[deg]25'46'' W.)
REEES, PA WP (Lat. 39[deg]47'52'' N., long. 077[deg]45'56'' W.)
TOMYD, MD WP (Lat. 39[deg]40' 52'' N., long. 077[deg]08'26'' W.)
T-299 UCREK, VA to SCAPE, PA [New]
UCREK, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]01'33'' N., long. 079[deg]02'56'' W.)
KAIJE, VA WP (Lat. 38[deg]44'35'' N., long. 078[deg]42'48'' W.)
BAMMY, WV WP (Lat. 39[deg]24'33'' N., long. 078[deg]25'46'' W.)
REEES, PA WP (Lat. 39[deg]47'52'' N., long. 077[deg]45'56'' W.)
SCAPE, PA Fix (Lat. 39[deg]56'42'' N., long. 077[deg]32'12'' W.)
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 21, 2013.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013-21004 Filed 8-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P