Radio Broadcasting Services; Chillicothe, Dublin, Hillsboro, and Marion, Ohio, 53054-53055 [2013-21031]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
53054
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the exemption in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
X. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 22, 2013.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.1323 to subpart D to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.1323 Ethyl-2E,4Z-decadienoate (Pear
Ester); exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is established for residues
of the biochemical pesticide, ethyl2E,4Z-decadienoate (pear ester), in or on
all food commodities, when used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2013–21019 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[FCC 13–105; MB Docket No. 02–266; RM–
10557]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Chillicothe, Dublin, Hillsboro, and
Marion, Ohio
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; application for
review.
AGENCY:
This document denies an
Application for Review filed by the
Committee for Competitive Columbus
Radio (‘‘Committee’’) of a Memorandum
Opinion and Order in this proceeding,
which denied the Committee’s Petition
for Reconsideration of an earlier Bureau
action, granting the reallotment, class
downgrade, and change of community
of license of an Ohio FM station. The
document finds that the Bureau
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
properly applied the Commission’s
then-existing policy of not considering
compliance with the multiple
ownership rule at the allotment stage.
DATES: August 28, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202)
418–2700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM
Docket No. 02–266, adopted July 31,
2013, and released August 1, 2013. The
full text of this Commission decision is
available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the
FCC Reference Information Center
(Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of this decision may also be
purchased from the Commission’s copy
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 1–800–378–3160 or
www.BCPIWEB.com.
In the Report and Order in this
proceeding, the Bureau granted a
Petition for Rulemaking filed by Clear
Channel Communications for the
reallotment, downgrade in class of
channel, and change of community of
license for its Station WCGX(FM)
(formerly WMRN–FM) from Channel
295B at Marion, Ohio to Channel 294B1
at Dublin, Ohio, over the objection of
the Committee. See 70 FR 19337 (April
13, 2005). The Committee had argued
that the reallotment to Dublin could not
be implemented because it would
violate the local radio ownership rule.
However, the Report and Order rejected
this argument, explaining that multiple
ownership issues are not considered in
FM allotment proceedings. The
Committee sought reconsideration on
the same ground, and the Bureau denied
the petition in the Memorandum
Opinion and Order. See 71 FR 40927
(July 19, 2006).
On review, the Commission finds
that, contrary to the Committee’s
contention, the Bureau did not err in
deferring the issue of compliance with
the multiple ownership rule until an
implementing application was filed
because such an approach is consistent
with then-existing policy. Additionally,
the Commission concludes that the
Bureau did not err in referring to Station
WCGX(FM) as formerly licensed to
Marion because the Report and Order
did modify the Station WCGX(FM)
license to specify Dublin. However, that
modification had no immediate impact
on competition in the Columbus radio
market as Clear Channel was required to
file an implementing application and
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
53055
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
demonstrate compliance with the
multiple ownership rule, which Clear
Channel did. This document is not
subject to the Congressional Review Act.
(The Commission, is, therefore, not
required to submit a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion and Order to
GAO, pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A)
because the Application for Review was
denied.)
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–21031 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
49 CFR Part 1002
[Docket No. EP 542 (Sub-No. 21)]
Regulations Governing Fees for
Services Performed in Connection
With Licensing and Related Services—
2013 Update
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Board updates for 2013
the fees that the public must pay to file
certain cases and pleadings with the
Board. The update will increase 28 fees
by $100 or less, increase 47 fees by more
than $100, and keep the remaining 50
fees at their existing level.
DATES: These rules are effective
September 27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David T. Groves, (202) 245–0327, or
Barbara Saddler (202) 245–0362. [TDD
for the hearing impaired: 1–800–877–
8339.]
SUMMARY:
The
Board’s regulations at 49 CFR 1002.3
provide for an annual update of the
Board’s entire user-fee schedule. Fees
are generally revised based on the cost
study formula set forth at 49 CFR
1002.3(d). The fee changes adopted here
reflect a combination of the unchanged
salary costs from the 2012 User Fee
Update decision; no change in the
publication cost levels of that decision;
plus increase changes to two of the three
Board overhead cost factors (the other
overhead factor remains unchanged
from its 2012 level), resulting from the
mechanical application of the update
formula in 49 CFR 1002.3(d). Results
from the formula application indicate
that justified fee amounts in this 2013
update decision either remain
unchanged (50 fees) or increase (75 fees)
from their respective 2012 update
levels. No new fee items are proposed
in this proceeding. Therefore, the Board
finds that notice and comment are
unnecessary for this proceeding. See
Regulations Governing Fees For
Services—1990 Update, 7 I.C.C.2d 3
(1990); Regulations Governing Fees For
Services—1991 Update, 8 I.C.C.2d 13
(1991); and Regulations Governing Fees
For Services—1993 Update, 9 I.C.C.2d
855 (1993).
Additional information is contained
in the Board’s decision. To obtain a free
copy of the full decision, visit the
Board’s Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov or call the Board’s
Information Officer at (202) 245–0245.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through Federal Information
Relay Services (FIRS): (800) 877–8339.]
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Begeman, and Commissioner
Mulvey.
Derrick A. Gardner,
Clearance Clerk.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 1002
Administrative practice and
procedure, Common carriers, and
Freedom of information.
§ 1002.2
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, title 49, chapter X, part 1002,
of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 1002—FEES
1. The authority citation for part 1002
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A) and 553;
31 U.S.C. 9701 and 49 U.S.C. 721(a).
2. Amend § 1002.1 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 1002.1 Fees for record search, review,
copying, certification, and related service.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Certificate of the Records Officer,
$18.00.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Fees for courier services to
transport agency records to provide onsite access to agency records stored offsite will be set at the rates set forth in
the Board’s agreement with its courier
service provider. Rate information can
be obtained from the Board’s Records
Officer, Room 1200, Surface
Transportation Board, Washington, DC
20423–0001.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 1002.2, paragraph (f) is revised
to read as follows:
■
*
Filing fees.
*
*
*
*
(f) Schedule of filing fees.
Decided: August 22, 2013.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Type of proceeding
Fee
PART I: Non-Rail Applications or Proceedings to Enter Upon a Particular Financial Transaction or Joint Arrangement:
(1) An application for the pooling or division of traffic .....................................................................................................
(2)(i) An application involving the purchase, lease, consolidation, merger, or acquisition of control of a motor carrier
of passengers under 49 U.S.C. 14303.
(ii) A petition for exemption under 49 U.S.C. 13541 (other than a rulemaking) filed by a non-rail carrier not otherwise covered.
(iii) A petition to revoke an exemption filed under 49 U.S.C. 13541(d) ...................................................................
(3) An application for approval of a non-rail rate association agreement. 49 U.S.C. 13703 ..........................................
(4) An application for approval of an amendment to a non-rail rate association agreement:
(i) Significant amendment .........................................................................................................................................
(ii) Minor amendment ................................................................................................................................................
(5) An application for temporary authority to operate a motor carrier of passengers. 49 U.S.C. 14303(i) .....................
(6) A notice of exemption for transaction within a motor passenger corporate family that does not result in adverse
changes in service levels, significant operational changes, or a change in the competitive balance with motor passenger carriers outside the corporate family.
(7)–(10) [Reserved]
PART II: Rail Licensing Proceedings other than Abandonment or Discontinuance Proceedings:
(11)(i) An application for a certificate authorizing the extension, acquisition, or operation of lines of railroad. 49
U.S.C. 10901.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
$4,700.
$2,100.
$3,400.
$2,800.
$29,600.
$4,900.
$100.
$500.
$1,800.
$7,800.
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53054-53055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21031]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[FCC 13-105; MB Docket No. 02-266; RM-10557]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Chillicothe, Dublin, Hillsboro, and
Marion, Ohio
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; application for review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document denies an Application for Review filed by the
Committee for Competitive Columbus Radio (``Committee'') of a
Memorandum Opinion and Order in this proceeding, which denied the
Committee's Petition for Reconsideration of an earlier Bureau action,
granting the reallotment, class downgrade, and change of community of
license of an Ohio FM station. The document finds that the Bureau
properly applied the Commission's then-existing policy of not
considering compliance with the multiple ownership rule at the
allotment stage.
DATES: August 28, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202)
418-2700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 02-266, adopted July 31,
2013, and released August 1, 2013. The full text of this Commission
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision
may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy
and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com.
In the Report and Order in this proceeding, the Bureau granted a
Petition for Rulemaking filed by Clear Channel Communications for the
reallotment, downgrade in class of channel, and change of community of
license for its Station WCGX(FM) (formerly WMRN-FM) from Channel 295B
at Marion, Ohio to Channel 294B1 at Dublin, Ohio, over the objection of
the Committee. See 70 FR 19337 (April 13, 2005). The Committee had
argued that the reallotment to Dublin could not be implemented because
it would violate the local radio ownership rule. However, the Report
and Order rejected this argument, explaining that multiple ownership
issues are not considered in FM allotment proceedings. The Committee
sought reconsideration on the same ground, and the Bureau denied the
petition in the Memorandum Opinion and Order. See 71 FR 40927 (July 19,
2006).
On review, the Commission finds that, contrary to the Committee's
contention, the Bureau did not err in deferring the issue of compliance
with the multiple ownership rule until an implementing application was
filed because such an approach is consistent with then-existing policy.
Additionally, the Commission concludes that the Bureau did not err in
referring to Station WCGX(FM) as formerly licensed to Marion because
the Report and Order did modify the Station WCGX(FM) license to specify
Dublin. However, that modification had no immediate impact on
competition in the Columbus radio market as Clear Channel was required
to file an implementing application and
[[Page 53055]]
demonstrate compliance with the multiple ownership rule, which Clear
Channel did. This document is not subject to the Congressional Review
Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of
this Memorandum Opinion and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the Application for
Review was denied.)
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21031 Filed 8-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
