Early Scoping Notification for the Alternatives Analysis of the GA 400 Transit Initiative in Fulton County, Georgia, 53187-53189 [2013-20996]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Notices
to encourage involvement by, and solicit
comments from, minority and lowincome populations in the project study
area will continue to be made. The EIS
will be made available for review by
federal and state resource agencies and
the public. Public information meetings,
all of which are announced in advance,
were held August 21 and 23, 2012;
December 5–6, 2012; May 21–22, 2013;
and July 30–31, 2013. In addition, a
public hearing will be held after the
completion of the Draft EIS.
Inquiries related to the I–94 East-West
Corridor Study can be sent to
DOTI94EastWest@dot.wi.gov. A public
Web site has been established for the
project and will be maintained
throughout the study for public
comment and information at https://
www.sefreeways.org. To ensure that the
full range of issues related to this
proposed action are addressed and all
significant issues identified, comments
and suggestions are invited from all
interested parties. Comments and
questions concerning the proposed
action and the EIS should be directed to
the FHWA address provided above.
Projects receiving Federal funds must
comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act and Executive Order 12898 Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority and Low-Income
Populations. Federal law prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race,
color, age, sex, or country of national
origin in the implementation of this
project. It is also Federal policy to
identify and address any
disproportionately high and adverse
effects of federal projects on the health
or environment of minority and lowincome populations to the greatest
extent practicable and permitted by law.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: August 22, 2013.
Bethaney Bacher-Gresock,
Major Projects Environmental Manager,
Federal Highway Administration, Madison
Wisconsin.
[FR Doc. 2013–20964 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Early Scoping Notification for the
Alternatives Analysis of the GA 400
Transit Initiative in Fulton County,
Georgia
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), United States Department of
Transportation (USDOT).
ACTION: Notice of early scoping meeting.
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and the
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority (MARTA) issue this early
scoping notice to advise other agencies
and the public that they intend to
explore potential alternatives for
providing high-capacity transit in the
GA 400 corridor in north Fulton County,
GA from Dunwoody to Alpharetta that
would improve transit linkages and
coverage to communities within this
corridor and would enhance mobility
and accessibility to and within the
corridor by providing a more robust
transit network that offers an alternative
to automobile travel. This notice invites
the public and agency officials to help
support the ongoing alternatives
analysis and system planning effort by
commenting on the project’s purpose
and need, the project study area, the
alternatives being considered, the
transportation problems that are being
addressed by the alternatives analysis
study, public participation and outreach
methods, the relevant transportation
and community impacts and benefits
being considered, known environmental
issues raised by public and agency
coordination to date, and the projected
capital and operating costs of this
project.
The early scoping process is intended
to support the alternatives analysis and
a future National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) scoping process and will
help streamline the future development
of an environmental impact statement
(EIS), if warranted. In addition, it
supports FTA planning requirements
associated with the New Starts
(‘‘Section 5309’’) funding program for
certain kinds of major capital
investments. While recent legislation
has led to changes in the New Starts
process, MARTA will comply with all
relevant FTA requirements relating to
planning and project development to
help analyze and screen alternatives in
preparation for the NEPA process.
Public meetings are described
immediately below. A more detailed
discussion of the project and this early
scoping process is included in sections
that follow.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53187
An early scoping meeting where
the public and interested agencies can
learn more about and comment on the
scope of the alternatives analysis will be
held on September 26, 2013, at 6:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. The location of this
meeting is indicated under ADDRESSES
below.
At the early scoping meeting, MARTA
will provide information on the
alternatives analysis progress along with
opportunities for written comments.
Written or electronic scoping comments
are requested by October 28, 2013, and
can be sent or emailed to the MARTA
project manager at the address below.
Comments may also be offered at the
early scoping meeting.
ADDRESSES: Written or electronic
comments should be sent to Ms. Janide
Sidifal, Project Manager, MARTA, 2424
Piedmont Road NE., Atlanta GA 30324–
3330 or by email to connect400@
itsmarta.com. If submitting an
electronic comment, please type
‘‘Connect 400 Early Scoping Comment
for MARTA’’ in the subject line of the
email. MARTA maintains a Facebook
page for the Connect 400 project and
will notify Facebook followers, in
conjunction with publication of this
notice, to submit comments to the
aforementioned email address as well.
The address for the early scoping
meeting is as follows:
Alpharetta City Hall, 2 Main Street,
Alpharetta, GA 30009.
The meeting location is accessible to
persons with disabilities. If translation,
signing services, or other special
accommodations are needed, please
contact the Project Manager, Ms. Janide
Sidifall at jsidifall@itsmarta.com or
404–848–5828; or the Senior Director of
Transit System Planning, Mr. Don
Williams at drwilliams@itsmarta.com or
404–848–4422 at least one week before
the scoping meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Keith Melton, Community Planner, FTA
Region IV, 230 Peachtree Street NW.,
Suite 800, Atlanta, GA 30303 or email:
keith.melton@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Early Scoping
Early scoping is an optional early step
in the NEPA process that precedes
NEPA scoping, which normally begins
when the FTA and the grant applicant
publish a notice of intent to prepare an
EIS. FTA encourages the use of early
scoping for major planning activities
and studies that may receive other FTA
funding as a way to start the NEPA
process during earlier project planning
phases. Early scoping is intended to
generate public and agency review and
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
53188
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Notices
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
comments on the scope of a planning
effort within a defined transportation
corridor, which helps the agency to
determine which particular alignment
variations, should receive more focused
study and development to streamline
the NEPA process. Early scoping can
serve not only to streamline the NEPA
process, but also to firmly link
transportation planning and NEPA;
making sure that the public and
interested agencies are given the
opportunity to review and provide
comments on the results of planning
activities and studies that can then be
used to inform the NEPA process. Early
scoping for the GA 400 Transit Initiative
is being conducted in support of NEPA
requirements and in accordance with
the Council on Environmental Quality’s
(CEQ) and FTA’s regulations and
guidance for implementing NEPA (40
CFR 1501.2 through 1501.8 and through
23 CFR 771.111), which encourage
federal agencies to initiate NEPA early
in their planning processes. Early
scoping allows the scoping process to
begin as soon as there is enough
information to describe the proposal so
that the public and relevant agencies
can participate effectively. This is
particularly useful in situations when a
proposed action involves a broadly
defined corridor with an array of transit
investment alternatives. This early
scoping notice invites public and
agency involvement with the ongoing
supplementary planning activities and
studies for the GA 400 Transit Initiative,
including review of the (a) Purpose and
need, (b) the proposed alternatives, and
(c) the potential environmental,
transportation, and community impacts
and benefits to consider during the
NEPA process.
The GA 400 Transit Initiative and the
Regional Transit System
The GA 400 Corridor Alternatives
Analysis (AA) was initiated by MARTA
in late 2011 to identify potential and
feasible transit modal alternatives in the
GA 400 corridor to address travel
demands. The GA 400 corridor is the
transportation spine of northern Fulton
County, one of the fastest growing subregions in the metro-Atlanta region. The
GA 400 Corridor AA addresses the
travel market in a study area generally
extending north along GA 400 from I–
285 in Dunwoody to the Fulton/Forsyth
County line north of Alpharetta, a
distance of approximately 15 miles. The
corridor is home to many employment
centers, including Perimeter Center in
the southern portion of the corridor, one
of the largest employment centers for
the region. Transit service to and within
the study area is provided primarily by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
MARTA heavy rail and bus. The Georgia
Regional Transportation Authority
(GRTA) also operates two bus routes
that connect the southern portion of the
GA 400 corridor with express bus
service at peak hours from the north and
southeast from outside the GA 400
corridor. Rail service extends from
Downtown Atlanta to the major retail
and employment centers, including the
Medical Center and Perimeter Center in
Dunwoody and Sandy Springs in the
southern portion of the corridor.
MARTA Bus service primarily functions
as feeder service to MARTA heavy rail
stations from areas to the north,
including Roswell, Alpharetta and
Milton. A number of the bus routes and
the MARTA heavy rail stations service
park-and-ride facilities.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed
Project
MARTA invites comments on the
following preliminary statement of the
project’s purpose and need.
The purpose of the project is to
provide reliable, convenient, efficient,
and sustainable transit service in the GA
400 corridor by:
• Providing high capacity transit (bus
and/or rail) through the GA 400 corridor
study area;
• Improving transit linkages and
coverage to communities within the
study area; and
• Enhancing mobility and
accessibility to and within the study
area by providing a more robust transit
network that offers an alternative to
automobile travel.
The need for this project arises from
the following:
• Travel demand—Increased travel
demand and traffic congestion;
• Transit mobility—There is
inadequate transit connectivity within
the northern Fulton study area and
between the study area and DeKalb,
Gwinnett, and Cobb Counties and
central Atlanta. In addition, east-west
transit connectivity is inadequate. The
limited routes across the Chattahoochee
River reflect the inadequate transit
connectivity;
• Transit travel times—Transit travel
times are not competitive with auto
travel times due to the lack of express
service; this is true for north-south trips
within the study area and for trips with
origins and destinations outside the
study area. Transit and auto travel times
cannot be compared for east-west trips
as there is no east-west transit service;
• Economic development—Traffic
congestion caused by insufficient
transportation system capacity affects
both personal travel and goods
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
movement, which constrains economic
development opportunities; and
• Air quality—The continued growth
of vehicular travel will negatively affect
air quality in the study area and the
region.
Potential Alternatives
MARTA is exploring alternative
transit mode, alignment, and design
options for high capacity transit service
in the GA 400 corridor using a threestep evaluation process. The three-step
evaluation process includes a Fatal Flaw
Analysis, Screen 1 and Screen 2 and is
generally characterized by the
application of an increasingly detailed
and comprehensive set of performance
measures to a decreasing number of
alternatives. Each step in the evaluation
process focuses the analysis on
progressively fewer alternatives with
higher levels of scrutiny. In addition,
the Build Alternatives are compared not
only to each other but also to the NoBuild Alternative, which provides the
benchmark for establishing the travel
benefits, environmental impacts of the
alternatives and the cost-effectiveness of
the alternatives. The GA 400 Corridor
Transit Initiative is currently in Screen
2. After consideration of the findings of
the first and second steps in the
evaluation process, MARTA has
identified an alignment that would
provide approximately 11.9 miles of
transit service along the GA 400 corridor
within existing right-of-way from the
existing North Springs MARTA station
to Windward Parkway. This alignment
is referred to as the GA 400–1A Build
Alternative. Bus rapid transit (BRT),
heavy rail transit (HRT), and light rail
transit (LRT) are the three transit modes
or technologies being considered for this
corridor. The three modes each have the
same general alignment, following GA
400 from North Springs MARTA station
to Windward Parkway. The LRT and the
BRT alternatives have six stations from
south to north: Northridge, Holcomb
Bridge, Mansell Road, North Point Mall,
Old Milton and Windward Parkway.
The HRT alternative is similar, but it
does not include a station at Old Milton.
The outcome of Screen 2 will be the
recommendation of the preferred
alternative. MARTA may also consider
other alternatives that arise during the
early scoping comment period.
FTA Procedures
At the end of the alternatives analysis
process, FTA and MARTA anticipate
identifying a preferred mode and
corridor for further evaluation during
the NEPA process. The classification of
the NEPA documentation will be
determined by the FTA at the end of the
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Notices
alternatives analysis. If the preferred
mode and alignment involve the
potential for significant environmental
impacts an EIS may be required. If an
EIS is required, a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an EIS will be published in the
Federal Register by FTA and the public
and interested agencies will have the
opportunity to participate in a review
and comment period on the scope of the
EIS.
Issued on: August 23, 2013.
Yvette G. Taylor,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–20996 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0002; Notice 2]
Dorel Juvenile Group, Denial of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Denial of petition.
AGENCY:
Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
(DJG) has determined that certain child
restraint systems manufactured between
July 20, 2010 and May 18, 2011 do not
fully comply with paragraph S5.5.2(l) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 213, Child Restraint
Systems (49 CFR 571.213). DJG has filed
an appropriate report pursuant to 49
CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports, dated July 19, 2011.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), DJG has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of
the petition was published, with a 30day comment period, on January 19,
2012 in the Federal Register (77 FR
2776). NHTSA received one comment
from Consumers Union (CU).
To view the petition, the comment,
and all supporting documents log onto
the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: https://www.
regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instructions to locate docket
number ‘‘NHTSA–2012–0002.’’
CONTACT INFORMATION: For further
information on this decision, contact
Mr. Zachary R. Fraser, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, the National
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), telephone (202) 366–5754,
facsimile (202) 366–7002.
Equipment Involved: Affected are
approximately 89,527 of the following
models of DJG child restraint systems
that were manufactured between July
20, 2010 and May 18, 2011:
22187ANL Alpha Omega Elite
22187REM Alpha Omega Elite
22187REMA Alpha Omega Elite
22187SAR Alpha Omega Elite
22187SARA Alpha Omega Elite
22465FSM Alpha Omega Elite
22790CGT Deluxe 3 in 1
CC033BMT Alpha Omega Elite
CC043ANK Alpha Omega Elite
CC043ANL Alpha Omega Elite
CC043AQS Alpha Omega Elite
CC046AAI Deluxe 3 in 1
CC046AAU Deluxe 3 in 1
CC046CTA Deluxe 3 in 1
CC046SNW Deluxe 3 in 1
CC046WPR Deluxe 3 in 1
CC050AJH Complete Air LX
CC050ANY Complete Air LX
CC050ANZ Complete Air LX
CC050AOQ Complete Air LX
CC051AIR Complete Air SE
Summary of DJG’S Analyses: DJG
described the noncompliance as
follows:
The child restraint systems at issue
utilize a permanently attached base
which is equipped with color
coordinated Ease of Use labels including
base labels depicting the rear-facing
mode instructions. Certain restraints
were equipped with base labels
positioned on the incorrect side of the
base. Although nearly all the
information is correct, the small
indicator arrows do not line up with the
rear-facing vehicle and LATCH belt path
for the rear-facing mode. As noted in the
Noncompliance Information Report, this
voluntarily supplied information caused
the installation diagram required by
FMVSS No. 213 S5.5.2(l) to be
inaccurate.
A noncompliance exists when the
base labels are installed incorrectly and
the indicator arrows do not point to the
rear-facing vehicle belt/LATCH routing
path. In this case, the arrows are
actually pointing to the area below the
forward-facing vehicle belt/LATCH path
routing but could be construed as
pointing to the forward-facing routing
path.
DJG states that the subject child
restraints contain the label information
required by S5.5.2(l). DJG asserts that
the voluntarily supplied information
consisting of pointing arrows caused the
installation diagrams required by
FMVSS No. 213 S5.5.2(l) to be
inaccurate when the labels containing
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53189
the diagrams were installed on the
incorrect side of the child restraint’s
base. NHTSA agrees with DJG that the
subject child restraints contain the
proper labels with the required
installation diagrams. However, DJG
voluntarily provided additional
information on the labels intended to
assist installation by adding pointing
arrows to the belt path appropriate for
that configuration.
NHTSA believes that the diagrams
provided by DJG are compliant with
S5.5.2(l) but the pointing arrows are
misplaced due to the incorrect
installation of the labels creating
confusing and misleading information
that is noncompliant with S5.5 of
FMVSS No. 213. The incorrect direction
of the pointing arrows lends to possible
confusion that the belts should be
routed through the forward-facing
routing path rather than through the
correct routing path.
DJG contends that the likelihood is
low that a consumer would interpret the
arrows as indicating the proper rearfacing path routing through the forwardfacing path routing. It asserts that the
proper rear-facing vehicle belt/LATCH
routing path is shown clearly in the five
diagrams on the two base labels.
DJG also argues that instructions
included with the subject child restraint
systems also correctly depict the rearfacing vehicle belt/LATCH routing path
numerous times.
DJG noted that it has received only
one user complaint related to this issue.
DJG also included the results of a survey
conducted to illustrate any effects the
noncompliance may have on seat
installation.
DJG contends that the technical
noncompliance issue reported in the
June 23, 2011, Noncompliance
Information Report does not constitute a
safety related issue because there is no
evidence that improper installation is
actually taking place in the field (as
evidenced by the lack of significant
complaints from consumers, advocates,
health care specialists or anyone else).
DJG also states that the preponderance
of correct rear-facing installation
diagrams and instructions appears to
outweigh the potential for improper
installation as a result of the ambiguous
arrows on the rear-facing installation
labels on the base. DJG also indicated
that there appears to be a low
probability that improper installation is
even possible in the vast majority of
vehicles surveyed, which represent a
cross section of vehicles in the field.
In summation, DJG asserts that the
described noncompliance of its child
restraints is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to
E:\FR\FM\28AUN1.SGM
28AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53187-53189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20996]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Early Scoping Notification for the Alternatives Analysis of the
GA 400 Transit Initiative in Fulton County, Georgia
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), United States Department
of Transportation (USDOT).
ACTION: Notice of early scoping meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) issue this early scoping notice
to advise other agencies and the public that they intend to explore
potential alternatives for providing high-capacity transit in the GA
400 corridor in north Fulton County, GA from Dunwoody to Alpharetta
that would improve transit linkages and coverage to communities within
this corridor and would enhance mobility and accessibility to and
within the corridor by providing a more robust transit network that
offers an alternative to automobile travel. This notice invites the
public and agency officials to help support the ongoing alternatives
analysis and system planning effort by commenting on the project's
purpose and need, the project study area, the alternatives being
considered, the transportation problems that are being addressed by the
alternatives analysis study, public participation and outreach methods,
the relevant transportation and community impacts and benefits being
considered, known environmental issues raised by public and agency
coordination to date, and the projected capital and operating costs of
this project.
The early scoping process is intended to support the alternatives
analysis and a future National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) scoping
process and will help streamline the future development of an
environmental impact statement (EIS), if warranted. In addition, it
supports FTA planning requirements associated with the New Starts
(``Section 5309'') funding program for certain kinds of major capital
investments. While recent legislation has led to changes in the New
Starts process, MARTA will comply with all relevant FTA requirements
relating to planning and project development to help analyze and screen
alternatives in preparation for the NEPA process.
Public meetings are described immediately below. A more detailed
discussion of the project and this early scoping process is included in
sections that follow.
DATES: An early scoping meeting where the public and interested
agencies can learn more about and comment on the scope of the
alternatives analysis will be held on September 26, 2013, at 6:30 p.m.
to 8:30 p.m. The location of this meeting is indicated under ADDRESSES
below.
At the early scoping meeting, MARTA will provide information on the
alternatives analysis progress along with opportunities for written
comments. Written or electronic scoping comments are requested by
October 28, 2013, and can be sent or emailed to the MARTA project
manager at the address below. Comments may also be offered at the early
scoping meeting.
ADDRESSES: Written or electronic comments should be sent to Ms. Janide
Sidifal, Project Manager, MARTA, 2424 Piedmont Road NE., Atlanta GA
30324-3330 or by email to connect400@itsmarta.com. If submitting an
electronic comment, please type ``Connect 400 Early Scoping Comment for
MARTA'' in the subject line of the email. MARTA maintains a Facebook
page for the Connect 400 project and will notify Facebook followers, in
conjunction with publication of this notice, to submit comments to the
aforementioned email address as well. The address for the early scoping
meeting is as follows:
Alpharetta City Hall, 2 Main Street, Alpharetta, GA 30009.
The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities. If
translation, signing services, or other special accommodations are
needed, please contact the Project Manager, Ms. Janide Sidifall at
jsidifall@itsmarta.com or 404-848-5828; or the Senior Director of
Transit System Planning, Mr. Don Williams at drwilliams@itsmarta.com or
404-848-4422 at least one week before the scoping meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Keith Melton, Community Planner,
FTA Region IV, 230 Peachtree Street NW., Suite 800, Atlanta, GA 30303
or email: keith.melton@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Early Scoping
Early scoping is an optional early step in the NEPA process that
precedes NEPA scoping, which normally begins when the FTA and the grant
applicant publish a notice of intent to prepare an EIS. FTA encourages
the use of early scoping for major planning activities and studies that
may receive other FTA funding as a way to start the NEPA process during
earlier project planning phases. Early scoping is intended to generate
public and agency review and
[[Page 53188]]
comments on the scope of a planning effort within a defined
transportation corridor, which helps the agency to determine which
particular alignment variations, should receive more focused study and
development to streamline the NEPA process. Early scoping can serve not
only to streamline the NEPA process, but also to firmly link
transportation planning and NEPA; making sure that the public and
interested agencies are given the opportunity to review and provide
comments on the results of planning activities and studies that can
then be used to inform the NEPA process. Early scoping for the GA 400
Transit Initiative is being conducted in support of NEPA requirements
and in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) and
FTA's regulations and guidance for implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1501.2
through 1501.8 and through 23 CFR 771.111), which encourage federal
agencies to initiate NEPA early in their planning processes. Early
scoping allows the scoping process to begin as soon as there is enough
information to describe the proposal so that the public and relevant
agencies can participate effectively. This is particularly useful in
situations when a proposed action involves a broadly defined corridor
with an array of transit investment alternatives. This early scoping
notice invites public and agency involvement with the ongoing
supplementary planning activities and studies for the GA 400 Transit
Initiative, including review of the (a) Purpose and need, (b) the
proposed alternatives, and (c) the potential environmental,
transportation, and community impacts and benefits to consider during
the NEPA process.
The GA 400 Transit Initiative and the Regional Transit System
The GA 400 Corridor Alternatives Analysis (AA) was initiated by
MARTA in late 2011 to identify potential and feasible transit modal
alternatives in the GA 400 corridor to address travel demands. The GA
400 corridor is the transportation spine of northern Fulton County, one
of the fastest growing sub-regions in the metro-Atlanta region. The GA
400 Corridor AA addresses the travel market in a study area generally
extending north along GA 400 from I-285 in Dunwoody to the Fulton/
Forsyth County line north of Alpharetta, a distance of approximately 15
miles. The corridor is home to many employment centers, including
Perimeter Center in the southern portion of the corridor, one of the
largest employment centers for the region. Transit service to and
within the study area is provided primarily by MARTA heavy rail and
bus. The Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA) also operates
two bus routes that connect the southern portion of the GA 400 corridor
with express bus service at peak hours from the north and southeast
from outside the GA 400 corridor. Rail service extends from Downtown
Atlanta to the major retail and employment centers, including the
Medical Center and Perimeter Center in Dunwoody and Sandy Springs in
the southern portion of the corridor. MARTA Bus service primarily
functions as feeder service to MARTA heavy rail stations from areas to
the north, including Roswell, Alpharetta and Milton. A number of the
bus routes and the MARTA heavy rail stations service park-and-ride
facilities.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project
MARTA invites comments on the following preliminary statement of
the project's purpose and need.
The purpose of the project is to provide reliable, convenient,
efficient, and sustainable transit service in the GA 400 corridor by:
Providing high capacity transit (bus and/or rail) through
the GA 400 corridor study area;
Improving transit linkages and coverage to communities
within the study area; and
Enhancing mobility and accessibility to and within the
study area by providing a more robust transit network that offers an
alternative to automobile travel.
The need for this project arises from the following:
Travel demand--Increased travel demand and traffic
congestion;
Transit mobility--There is inadequate transit connectivity
within the northern Fulton study area and between the study area and
DeKalb, Gwinnett, and Cobb Counties and central Atlanta. In addition,
east-west transit connectivity is inadequate. The limited routes across
the Chattahoochee River reflect the inadequate transit connectivity;
Transit travel times--Transit travel times are not
competitive with auto travel times due to the lack of express service;
this is true for north-south trips within the study area and for trips
with origins and destinations outside the study area. Transit and auto
travel times cannot be compared for east-west trips as there is no
east-west transit service;
Economic development--Traffic congestion caused by
insufficient transportation system capacity affects both personal
travel and goods movement, which constrains economic development
opportunities; and
Air quality--The continued growth of vehicular travel will
negatively affect air quality in the study area and the region.
Potential Alternatives
MARTA is exploring alternative transit mode, alignment, and design
options for high capacity transit service in the GA 400 corridor using
a three-step evaluation process. The three-step evaluation process
includes a Fatal Flaw Analysis, Screen 1 and Screen 2 and is generally
characterized by the application of an increasingly detailed and
comprehensive set of performance measures to a decreasing number of
alternatives. Each step in the evaluation process focuses the analysis
on progressively fewer alternatives with higher levels of scrutiny. In
addition, the Build Alternatives are compared not only to each other
but also to the No-Build Alternative, which provides the benchmark for
establishing the travel benefits, environmental impacts of the
alternatives and the cost-effectiveness of the alternatives. The GA 400
Corridor Transit Initiative is currently in Screen 2. After
consideration of the findings of the first and second steps in the
evaluation process, MARTA has identified an alignment that would
provide approximately 11.9 miles of transit service along the GA 400
corridor within existing right-of-way from the existing North Springs
MARTA station to Windward Parkway. This alignment is referred to as the
GA 400-1A Build Alternative. Bus rapid transit (BRT), heavy rail
transit (HRT), and light rail transit (LRT) are the three transit modes
or technologies being considered for this corridor. The three modes
each have the same general alignment, following GA 400 from North
Springs MARTA station to Windward Parkway. The LRT and the BRT
alternatives have six stations from south to north: Northridge, Holcomb
Bridge, Mansell Road, North Point Mall, Old Milton and Windward
Parkway. The HRT alternative is similar, but it does not include a
station at Old Milton. The outcome of Screen 2 will be the
recommendation of the preferred alternative. MARTA may also consider
other alternatives that arise during the early scoping comment period.
FTA Procedures
At the end of the alternatives analysis process, FTA and MARTA
anticipate identifying a preferred mode and corridor for further
evaluation during the NEPA process. The classification of the NEPA
documentation will be determined by the FTA at the end of the
[[Page 53189]]
alternatives analysis. If the preferred mode and alignment involve the
potential for significant environmental impacts an EIS may be required.
If an EIS is required, a Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS will be
published in the Federal Register by FTA and the public and interested
agencies will have the opportunity to participate in a review and
comment period on the scope of the EIS.
Issued on: August 23, 2013.
Yvette G. Taylor,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-20996 Filed 8-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P