Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Kearny and Newark, NJ, 53107-53109 [2013-20684]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. From March 1, 2014 until March 1,
2016, add paragraph (i) to § 117.723 to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.723
Hackensack River.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) The draw of the Route 1 & 9
(Lincoln Highway) Bridge, mile 2.0,
between Kearny and Jersey City, shall
open on signal; except that, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessel
traffic between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. and
between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. Tide
dependent deep draft vessels may
request bridge openings between 6 a.m.
and 10 a.m. and between 2 p.m. and 6
p.m. provided at least a twelve hour
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
Dated: August 7, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–20685 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Tables of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0638]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Passaic River, Kearny and Newark, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily modify the operating
schedule that governs the Route 1 & 9
(Lincoln Highway) Bridge across the
Passaic River, mile 1.8, between
Kearney and Newark, New Jersey. The
bridge owner, New Jersey Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to
restrict bridge openings during the
morning and afternoon rush hour
periods to alleviate traffic congestion
resulting from area roadway closures. It
is expected that this change to the
regulations would provide relief to
vehicular traffic while continuing to
meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 27, 2013
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0638 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Joe Arca, Project
Officer, First Coast Guard District Bridge
Program, telephone 212–668–7165,
email joe.m.arca@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
Jkt 229001
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2013–0638),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53107
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2013–0638 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8c by 11
inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0638) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit either
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
53108
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway)
Bridge at mile 1.8, across the Passaic
River between Kearney and Newark,
New Jersey, has a vertical clearance of
40 feet at mean high water and 45 feet
at mean low water. The drawbridge
operation regulations are listed at 33
CFR 117.739(b).
The waterway users are recreational
and commercial vessels.
The owner of the bridge, New Jersey
Department of Transportation,
submitted a request to the Coast Guard
to temporarily change the drawbridge
operating regulations.
The purpose of this temporary rule is
to help provide relief by reducing
vehicular traffic congestion during the
morning and afternoon vehicular rush
hour periods due to local construction
detours. Vehicular traffic will be
detoured from the adjacent Pulaski
Skyway Bridge to the Route 1 & 9 Bridge
(Lincoln Highway) Bridge for two years
commencing on March 1, 2014 and
continuing through March 1, 2016,
while the Pulaski Skyway Bridge is
under construction to replace its deck.
The existing regulations require the
Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway) Bridge
to open on signal at all times provided
a four hour advance notice is given.
Under this proposed temporary rule,
the draw would open on signal
provided a four hour advance notice is
given; except that, the draw need not
open for the passage of vessel traffic
between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.
and 6 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except holidays. Tide dependent deep
draft vessels may request bride openings
during the two rush hour closure
periods provided at least a twelve hour
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to suspend
the drawbridge operation regulations at
33 CFR 117.739(b) until March 1, 2016.
The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily add paragraph (p) to section
117.739 to allow the bridge owner to
keep the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway)
Bridge in the closed position during the
morning and afternoon rush hour
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
periods between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. and
2 p.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays, to facilitate
additional vehicular traffic detoured
from the Pulaski Skyway Bridge which
will be under construction from March
1, 2014 through March 1, 2016.
Tide dependent deep draft vessels
would be able to request bridges
openings during the rush hour closed
periods provided at least a twelve hour
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
Based on the above information, the
Coast Guard believes it is reasonable to
allow the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln
Highway) Bridge to remain in the closed
position during the morning and
afternoon rush hours to facilitate
additional vehicular traffic detoured
during the two year bridge deck
replacement project at the Pulaski
Skyway Bridge from March 1, 2014
through March 1, 2016.
The twelve hour advance notice
requirement for bridge openings during
the rush hour periods gives mariners
ample time to plan and optimize their
transits through the waterway and also
gives the bridge owner the opportunity
to alert commuters of any expected
delays caused by pending bridge
openings.
If the Route 1 & 9 Bridge opened
frequently for vessel traffic during the
morning and afternoon rush hours,
given the additional detoured vehicular
traffic, it likely would result in
significant vehicular traffic delays that
could impact the ability for emergency
vehicles to respond to emergency
situations.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866, or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. We believe that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action
because the bridge provides adequate
clearance for recreational vessels to
transit the bridge in the closed position
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and the commercial vessels will be able
to request openings between 6 p.m. and
6 a.m. and again, from 10 a.m. until 2
p.m. provided the requisite advance
notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge. Additionally,
commercial deep draft vessel traffic may
request bridge openings during the
closure periods if at least a twelve hour
advance notice is given.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels needing to transit
through the bridge between 6 a.m. and
10 a.m. or between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The high vertical
clearance of 40 feet at mean high water
should accommodate all present vessel
traffic except deep draft. The bridge will
continue to open on signal for
commercial deep draft vessel traffic
provided at least a twelve hour advance
notice is given. Additionally, all other
vessels can transit the bridge between 6
p.m. and 6 a.m. and again, from 10 a.m.
until 2 p.m. provided the requisite
amount of notice is given.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the ‘‘FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT’’ section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Aug 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of significant
environmental impact from the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
53109
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. From March 1, 2014 until March 1,
2016, suspend § 117.739(b) and add a
new temporary paragraph (p) to read as
follows:
■
§ 117.739
Passaic River.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) The draw of the Route 1 & 9
(Lincoln Highway) Bridge, mile 1.8,
between Kearny and Newark, shall open
on signal if at least a four hour advance
notice is given, except that, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessel
traffic between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. and
between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. Tide
dependent deep draft vessels may
request bridge openings between 6 a.m.
and 10 a.m. and between 2 p.m. and 6
p.m. provided at least a twelve hour
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 7, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–20684 Filed 8–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0580]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones; Naval Base Point
Loma; Naval Mine Anti-Submarine
Warfare Command; San Diego Bay,
San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes
extending a portion of an existing San
Diego Bay security zone at Naval Base
Point Loma to support the construction
of a new Naval fuel pier. In addition to
the extension of the Naval Base Point
Loma security zone, a new security zone
will be established at the Naval Mine
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53107-53109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0638]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Kearny and
Newark, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to temporarily modify the operating
schedule that governs the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway) Bridge across
the Passaic River, mile 1.8, between Kearney and Newark, New Jersey.
The bridge owner, New Jersey Department of Transportation, submitted a
request to restrict bridge openings during the morning and afternoon
rush hour periods to alleviate traffic congestion resulting from area
roadway closures. It is expected that this change to the regulations
would provide relief to vehicular traffic while continuing to meet the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before October 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0638 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Joe Arca, Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District Bridge Program, telephone 212-668-7165, email
joe.m.arca@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tables of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2013-0638), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2013-0638 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0638) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
[[Page 53108]]
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway) Bridge at mile 1.8, across the
Passaic River between Kearney and Newark, New Jersey, has a vertical
clearance of 40 feet at mean high water and 45 feet at mean low water.
The drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.739(b).
The waterway users are recreational and commercial vessels.
The owner of the bridge, New Jersey Department of Transportation,
submitted a request to the Coast Guard to temporarily change the
drawbridge operating regulations.
The purpose of this temporary rule is to help provide relief by
reducing vehicular traffic congestion during the morning and afternoon
vehicular rush hour periods due to local construction detours.
Vehicular traffic will be detoured from the adjacent Pulaski Skyway
Bridge to the Route 1 & 9 Bridge (Lincoln Highway) Bridge for two years
commencing on March 1, 2014 and continuing through March 1, 2016, while
the Pulaski Skyway Bridge is under construction to replace its deck.
The existing regulations require the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway)
Bridge to open on signal at all times provided a four hour advance
notice is given.
Under this proposed temporary rule, the draw would open on signal
provided a four hour advance notice is given; except that, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessel traffic between 6 a.m. and 10
a.m. and 2 p.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Tide dependent deep draft vessels may request bride openings during the
two rush hour closure periods provided at least a twelve hour advance
notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to suspend the drawbridge operation
regulations at 33 CFR 117.739(b) until March 1, 2016. The Coast Guard
proposes to temporarily add paragraph (p) to section 117.739 to allow
the bridge owner to keep the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway) Bridge in
the closed position during the morning and afternoon rush hour periods
between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays, to facilitate additional vehicular traffic
detoured from the Pulaski Skyway Bridge which will be under
construction from March 1, 2014 through March 1, 2016.
Tide dependent deep draft vessels would be able to request bridges
openings during the rush hour closed periods provided at least a twelve
hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
Based on the above information, the Coast Guard believes it is
reasonable to allow the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway) Bridge to remain
in the closed position during the morning and afternoon rush hours to
facilitate additional vehicular traffic detoured during the two year
bridge deck replacement project at the Pulaski Skyway Bridge from March
1, 2014 through March 1, 2016.
The twelve hour advance notice requirement for bridge openings
during the rush hour periods gives mariners ample time to plan and
optimize their transits through the waterway and also gives the bridge
owner the opportunity to alert commuters of any expected delays caused
by pending bridge openings.
If the Route 1 & 9 Bridge opened frequently for vessel traffic
during the morning and afternoon rush hours, given the additional
detoured vehicular traffic, it likely would result in significant
vehicular traffic delays that could impact the ability for emergency
vehicles to respond to emergency situations.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866, or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. We believe that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because the bridge provides
adequate clearance for recreational vessels to transit the bridge in
the closed position and the commercial vessels will be able to request
openings between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. and again, from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m.
provided the requisite advance notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge. Additionally, commercial deep draft vessel
traffic may request bridge openings during the closure periods if at
least a twelve hour advance notice is given.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
needing to transit through the bridge between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. or
between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The
high vertical clearance of 40 feet at mean high water should
accommodate all present vessel traffic except deep draft. The bridge
will continue to open on signal for commercial deep draft vessel
traffic provided at least a twelve hour advance notice is given.
Additionally, all other vessels can transit the bridge between 6 p.m.
and 6 a.m. and again, from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m. provided the requisite
amount of notice is given.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for
[[Page 53109]]
compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT'' section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of significant environmental
impact from the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. From March 1, 2014 until March 1, 2016, suspend Sec. 117.739(b) and
add a new temporary paragraph (p) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.739 Passaic River.
* * * * *
(p) The draw of the Route 1 & 9 (Lincoln Highway) Bridge, mile 1.8,
between Kearny and Newark, shall open on signal if at least a four hour
advance notice is given, except that, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessel traffic between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. and between 2 p.m.
and 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Tide dependent deep
draft vessels may request bridge openings between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m.
and between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m. provided at least a twelve hour advance
notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
* * * * *
Dated: August 7, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-20684 Filed 8-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P