VA Veteran-Owned Small Business Verification Guidelines, 52085-52087 [2013-20488]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0274; Airspace
Docket No. 13–ACE–2]
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Stockton, KS
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action establishes Class
E airspace at Stockton, KS. Controlled
airspace is necessary to accommodate
new Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures at
Rooks County Regional Airport. The
FAA is taking this action to enhance the
safety and management of Instrument
Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the
airport.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: 0901 UTC,
December 12, 2013. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817–321–
7716.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
History
On April 30, 2013, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
establish Class E airspace for the
Stockton, KS, area, creating controlled
airspace at Rooks County Regional
Airport (78 FR 25229) Docket No. FAA–
2013–0274. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received. Class E
airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9W
dated August 8, 2012, and effective
September 15, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by
establishing Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
within a 7-mile radius of Rooks County
Regional Airport, Stockton, KS, with an
extension from the 7-mile radius to 10.1
miles south of the airport to contain
aircraft executing new standard
instrument approach procedures at the
airport. Controlled airspace enhances
the safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it establishes
controlled airspace at Rooks County
Regional Airport, Stockton, KS.
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
*
*
*
*
*
ACE KS E5 Stockton, KS [New]
Stockton, Rooks County Regional Airport, KS
(Lat. 39°20′48″ N., long. 99°18′17″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of Rooks County Regional Airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 181° bearing
from the airport extending from the 7-mile
radius to 10.1 miles south of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 12,
2013.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013–20376 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 74
Environmental Review
PO 00000
52085
RIN 2900–AO49
VA Veteran-Owned Small Business
Verification Guidelines
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document adopts as a
final rule, without change, the interim
final rule published in the Federal
Register on June 27, 2012. This
document implements a portion of the
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and
Information Technology Act of 2006,
which requires the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) to verify
ownership and control of veteran-
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
52086
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
owned small businesses (VOSBs),
including service-disabled veteranowned small businesses (SDVOSBs), in
order for these firms to participate in
VA acquisitions set asides for SDVOSB/
VOSBs. Specifically, this final rule
requires re-verification of SDVOSB/
VOSB status only every 2 years rather
than annually. The purpose of this
change is to reduce the administrative
burden on SDVOSB/VOSBs regarding
participation in VA acquisitions set
asides for these types of firms. Verified
SDVOSB/VOSBs are placed on the
Vendor Information Page (VIP) at
www.vetbiz.gov.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective August 22, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Gardner-Ince, Director, Center
for Veterans Enterprise (00VE),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20420, phone (202) 303–3260 x5237.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
27, 2012, VA published in the Federal
Register (77 FR 38181) an interim final
rule that revised the requirement for reverification of SDVOSB/VOSB status
from 1 year to 2 years. As noted in the
preamble to the interim final rule, VA
has concluded that an annual
examination is not necessary to
adequately maintain the integrity of the
Verification Program.
We provided a 60-day comment
period that ended on August 27, 2012.
We received six comments. Four
commenters discussed that the words
‘‘open market’’ should be removed from
the sentence ‘‘In accordance with 38
U.S.C. 8127 and VA Acquisition
Regulation, 48 CFR part 819, VA is
required to set aside any open market
procurement for SDVOSBs and then
VOSBs, first and second respectively, if
two or more such concerns are
reasonably anticipated to submit offers
at fair and reasonable pricing.’’ This
sentence was part of the background
information contained in the preamble
and not a part of the regulatory
language. VA’s interpretation with
respect to the traditional relationship
between set-asides conducted in openmarket acquisitions and the Federal
Supply Schedule (FSS), namely that
agencies are not required to implement
set-aside programs before or while using
the FSS, has been upheld in
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v.
United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 226 (2012).
In any event, the regulatory language
only addressed the expansion of the
SDVOSB/VOSB re-verification status
requirement from 1 year to 2 years and,
therefore, these comments are outside
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
the scope of this rulemaking. We make
no changes based on these comments.
Two additional commenters endorsed
the proposed change. VA appreciates
the commenters’ support.
Based on the rationale set forth in the
interim final rule and for the reasons
discussed above, we adopt the interim
final rule as a final rule without change.
Administrative Procedure Act
This document affirms as final the
interim final rule that is already in
effect. In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs concluded that there
was good cause to dispense with
advance public notice and opportunity
to comment on this rule and good cause
to publish this rule with an immediate
effective date. The rule makes only a
minor modification to extend the
eligibility period for SDVOSB/VOSBs
after VA’s initial robust verification
examination and approval from 1 year
to 2 years. The rule reduces the
administrative burden on SDVOSB/
VOSB participants by eliminating
annual re-verification submissions. The
integrity of the program remains
protected by the initial robust and
detailed verification examination, the
regulatory requirement of participants to
report changes to ownership and control
during their eligibility period, VA’s
authority to conduct random site
examinations and to re-examine
eligibility upon receipt of any
reasonably credible information
affecting SDVOSB/VOSB verified status,
and, for individual acquisitions, the
status protest process, where VA
contracting officers or competing
vendors can challenge the SDVOSB/
VOSB status of offerors if a reasonable
basis can be asserted to be decided by
VA’s Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization on SDVOSB/VOSB
set-aside acquisitions. In view of the
detrimental effects of continuing an
unnecessary administrative burden on
program participants and verifying
officials, and to avoid delays in
verification caused by repetitive annual
reviews, the Secretary concluded that it
was impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date of this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601–612, applies to this final
rule. This final rule is generally neutral
in its effect on small businesses because
it relates only to small businesses
applying for verified status in VA’s
SDVOSB/VOSB verified database. The
overall impact of the rule will benefit
small businesses owned by veterans or
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
service-disabled veterans because it will
reduce their administrative burden
associated with maintaining verified
status by extending the need for reverification by VA from 1 year to 2
years. VA has estimated the cost to an
individual business to be less than
$100.00 for 70–75 percent of the
businesses seeking verification, and the
average cost to the entire population of
businesses seeking to become verified is
less than $325.00 on average. Increasing
the verification period will decrease the
frequency of any such costs. On this
basis, the Secretary certifies that the
adoption of this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
rulemaking is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s Web site
at https://www1.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations
Published.’’
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no new
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
This final rule affects the verification
guidelines of veteran-owned small
businesses, for which there is no Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance program
number.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose
D. Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of
Veterans Affairs approved this
document on July 7, 2013, for
publication.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 74
Administrative practice and
procedures, Privacy, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
business, Veteran, Veteran-owned small
business, Verification.
Dated: August 19, 2013.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director, Regulation Policy and Management,
Office of the General Counsel, Department
of Veterans Affairs.
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 38 CFR part 74, which was
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
52087
[FR Doc. 2013–20488 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 12, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
[FR Doc. 2013–20416 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am]
published on June 27, 2012, at 77 FR
38181, is adopted without change.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
40 CFR Part 52
National Park Service
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0502; FRL–9900–30–
Region 5]
36 CFR Part 5
Office of the Secretary of the Interior
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Disapproval of PM2.5
Permitting Requirements; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
43 CFR Part 5
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 27
[NPS–WASO–VRP–09328; PXXVPADO515]
EPA published a final rule in
the Federal Register on July 25, 2013,
disapproving a Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan revision pertaining
to permitting requirements relating to
particulate matter of less than 2.5
micrometers (PM2.5). An error in the
amendatory instruction is identified and
corrected in this action.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on August 26, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christos Panos, Environmental
Engineer, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8328, panos.christos@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA
published a final rule document on July
25, 2013, (78 FR 44881) disapproving
revisions to Wisconsin rules NR 400,
404, 405, 406, 407, 408 and 484,
submitted by the State on May 12, 2011,
because the rule revisions submitted are
not consistent with Federal regulations
governing state permitting programs. In
this disapproval EPA erroneously stated
that the revision was being made to 40
CFR 52 Subpart P—Indiana, but the
language should have said the revision
was being made to Subpart YY—
Wisconsin. Therefore, the amendatory
instruction is being corrected to reflect
the corrected subpart reference.
RIN 1024–AD30
Correction
• Directs the Secretaries of the
Interior and Agriculture to establish a
permit system for commercial filming
and similar activities.
• Directs the Secretaries to collect an
amount to cover agency costs as well as
a reasonable fee for the use of Federal
SUMMARY:
In the final rule published in the
Federal Register on July 25, 2013, (78
FR 44881), on page 44884, second
column, below amendatory instruction
1, ‘‘Subpart P—Indiana’’ is corrected to
read: ‘‘Subpart YY—Wisconsin’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Commercial Filming and Similar
Projects and Still Photography
Activities
National Park Service, Office of
the Secretary of the Interior, and Fish
and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements
legislation that directs the Department
of the Interior to establish permits and
reasonable fees for commercial filming
activities or similar projects and certain
still photography activities.
DATES: The rule is effective September
23, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee
Dickinson, Special Park Uses Program
Manager, National Park Service, 1849 C
Street NW., CODE 2460, Washington,
DC 20240, telephone: 202–513–7092 or
email: Lee_Dickinson@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
published a proposed rule on this
subject in the Federal Register on
August 20, 2007 (72 FR 46426). The
proposed rule’s comment period ended
on October 19, 2007, and resulted in 57
submissions containing 30 distinct
comments. We made numerous changes
to the rule in response to these
comments. These comments and our
responses are summarized in this
preamble under Response to Comments.
SUMMARY:
Public Law 106–206
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52085-52087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20488]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 74
RIN 2900-AO49
VA Veteran-Owned Small Business Verification Guidelines
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a final rule, without change, the
interim final rule published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2012.
This document implements a portion of the Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, which requires the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to verify ownership and control of
veteran-
[[Page 52086]]
owned small businesses (VOSBs), including service-disabled veteran-
owned small businesses (SDVOSBs), in order for these firms to
participate in VA acquisitions set asides for SDVOSB/VOSBs.
Specifically, this final rule requires re-verification of SDVOSB/VOSB
status only every 2 years rather than annually. The purpose of this
change is to reduce the administrative burden on SDVOSB/VOSBs regarding
participation in VA acquisitions set asides for these types of firms.
Verified SDVOSB/VOSBs are placed on the Vendor Information Page (VIP)
at www.vetbiz.gov.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective August 22, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Gardner-Ince, Director,
Center for Veterans Enterprise (00VE), Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20420, phone (202) 303-3260 x5237.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 27, 2012, VA published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 38181) an interim final rule that revised the
requirement for re-verification of SDVOSB/VOSB status from 1 year to 2
years. As noted in the preamble to the interim final rule, VA has
concluded that an annual examination is not necessary to adequately
maintain the integrity of the Verification Program.
We provided a 60-day comment period that ended on August 27, 2012.
We received six comments. Four commenters discussed that the words
``open market'' should be removed from the sentence ``In accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 8127 and VA Acquisition Regulation, 48 CFR part 819, VA
is required to set aside any open market procurement for SDVOSBs and
then VOSBs, first and second respectively, if two or more such concerns
are reasonably anticipated to submit offers at fair and reasonable
pricing.'' This sentence was part of the background information
contained in the preamble and not a part of the regulatory language.
VA's interpretation with respect to the traditional relationship
between set-asides conducted in open-market acquisitions and the
Federal Supply Schedule (FSS), namely that agencies are not required to
implement set-aside programs before or while using the FSS, has been
upheld in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl.
226 (2012). In any event, the regulatory language only addressed the
expansion of the SDVOSB/VOSB re-verification status requirement from 1
year to 2 years and, therefore, these comments are outside the scope of
this rulemaking. We make no changes based on these comments. Two
additional commenters endorsed the proposed change. VA appreciates the
commenters' support.
Based on the rationale set forth in the interim final rule and for
the reasons discussed above, we adopt the interim final rule as a final
rule without change.
Administrative Procedure Act
This document affirms as final the interim final rule that is
already in effect. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3),
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs concluded that there was good cause
to dispense with advance public notice and opportunity to comment on
this rule and good cause to publish this rule with an immediate
effective date. The rule makes only a minor modification to extend the
eligibility period for SDVOSB/VOSBs after VA's initial robust
verification examination and approval from 1 year to 2 years. The rule
reduces the administrative burden on SDVOSB/VOSB participants by
eliminating annual re-verification submissions. The integrity of the
program remains protected by the initial robust and detailed
verification examination, the regulatory requirement of participants to
report changes to ownership and control during their eligibility
period, VA's authority to conduct random site examinations and to re-
examine eligibility upon receipt of any reasonably credible information
affecting SDVOSB/VOSB verified status, and, for individual
acquisitions, the status protest process, where VA contracting officers
or competing vendors can challenge the SDVOSB/VOSB status of offerors
if a reasonable basis can be asserted to be decided by VA's Office of
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization on SDVOSB/VOSB set-aside
acquisitions. In view of the detrimental effects of continuing an
unnecessary administrative burden on program participants and verifying
officials, and to avoid delays in verification caused by repetitive
annual reviews, the Secretary concluded that it was impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to public interest to delay the effective
date of this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, applies to this
final rule. This final rule is generally neutral in its effect on small
businesses because it relates only to small businesses applying for
verified status in VA's SDVOSB/VOSB verified database. The overall
impact of the rule will benefit small businesses owned by veterans or
service-disabled veterans because it will reduce their administrative
burden associated with maintaining verified status by extending the
need for re-verification by VA from 1 year to 2 years. VA has estimated
the cost to an individual business to be less than $100.00 for 70-75
percent of the businesses seeking verification, and the average cost to
the entire population of businesses seeking to become verified is less
than $325.00 on average. Increasing the verification period will
decrease the frequency of any such costs. On this basis, the Secretary
certifies that the adoption of this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
[[Page 52087]]
implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web
site at https://www1.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA
Regulations Published.''
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no new provisions constituting a
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
This final rule affects the verification guidelines of veteran-
owned small businesses, for which there is no Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance program number.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D.
Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs approved this
document on July 7, 2013, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 74
Administrative practice and procedures, Privacy, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small business, Veteran, Veteran-owned
small business, Verification.
Dated: August 19, 2013.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director, Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 38 CFR part 74, which
was published on June 27, 2012, at 77 FR 38181, is adopted without
change.
[FR Doc. 2013-20488 Filed 8-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P