Vessel Traffic Service Updates, Including Establishment of Vessel Traffic Service Requirements for Port Arthur, Texas and Expansion of VTS Special Operating Area in Puget Sound, 51664-51673 [2013-20399]
Download as PDF
51664
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The name, initials or identification
number of the person who weighed the
feed, or if required by State law, the
signature of the weigher;
(4) The city and state in which the
scale is located, and, if a facility has
more than one scale on which feed is
weighed, the identity of the scale;
(5) The zero balance; provided that
when using a vehicle scale to weigh
feed for more than one producer or
grower on the same multi-compartment
truck, the preceding producer’s or
grower’s gross weight can be used for
the next producer’s or grower’s tare
weight without printing a zero balance,
and repeated until the unit is full;
(6) The date and time zero balance
was determined;
(7) The gross weight, tare weight, and
net weight of each lot assigned to an
individual producer or grower, if
applicable;
(8) The date and time gross weight
and, if applicable, tare weight, are
determined;
(9) The identification of each lot
assigned to an individual producer or
grower by vehicle or trailer
compartment number and seal number,
if applicable;
(10) Whether the driver was on or off
the truck at the time of weighing, if
applicable; and
(11) The license number or other
identification numbers on the truck and
trailer, if weighed together, or trailer if
only the trailer is weighed, if applicable.
■ 3. Revise § 201.76 to read as follows:
§ 201.76
Reweighing.
Stockyard owners, market agencies,
dealers, packers, swine contractors and
live poultry dealers must reweigh
livestock, livestock carcasses, and live
poultry or feed on request of any
authorized representative of the
Secretary.
■ 4. Revise § 201.82 to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 201.82 Care and promptness in weighing
and handling livestock and live poultry.
(a) Each stockyard owner, market
agency, dealer, packer, swine contractor
and live poultry dealer must exercise
reasonable care and promptness with
respect to loading, transporting,
holding, yarding, feeding, watering,
weighing, or otherwise handling
livestock, or live poultry to prevent
waste of feed, shrinkage, injury, death or
other avoidable loss.
(b) Whenever live poultry is obtained
under a poultry growing arrangement
and the weight of the live poultry is a
factor in calculating payment to the
grower, the poultry must be transported
promptly after loading. The process of
obtaining the gross weight must
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
commence immediately upon arrival at
the processing plant, holding yard, or
other scale normally used for such
purpose. The process of obtaining the
gross weight which may include, but is
not limited to, fueling, uncoupling the
trailer, changing the road tractor to a
yard tractor or weighing the trailer only,
must be conducted without delay;
specifically, the time period between
arrival and completion of the process of
obtaining the gross weight must not
exceed thirty (30) minutes.
(c) Live poultry dealers must not
place poultry from multiple growers on
a single live poultry transport trailer or
other live poultry transport equipment,
creating what is commonly referred to
as a ‘‘split load.’’
■ 5. Amend § 201.108–1 to:
■ a. Revise the heading;
■ b. Revise the first sentence of the
introductory text;
■ c. Revise paragraph (a)(1);
■ d. Remove paragraph (a)(7);
■ e. Add paragraphs (c)(1)(v) and (vi);
■ f. Add paragraph (d)(3);
■ g. Remove paragraph (e)(2) and
redesignate paragraphs (e)(3) and (4) as
paragraphs (e)(2) and (3).
§ 201.108–1 Instructions for weighing live
poultry or feed.
Live poultry dealers who operate
scales on which live poultry or feed is
weighed for purposes of purchase, sale,
acquisition, or settlement are
responsible for the accurate weighing of
such poultry or feed. * * *
(a) * * * (1) The scale must be
maintained in zero balance at all times.
The empty scale must be balanced each
day before weighing begins and
thereafter the scale must be balanced;
and the zero balance, the time and date
the empty scale was balanced must be
mechanically printed on the scale ticket
or other basic transaction record before
any poultry or feed is weighed. In
addition, the zero balance of the scale
must be verified whenever a weigher
resumes weighing duties after an
absence from the scale.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) A feed hopper attached to an
electronic digital scale must be empty of
feed and the electronic digital scale
must be balanced at zero prior to first
weighment for each grower or per
truckload, whichever is applicable. The
date and time that the empty hopper
scale is balanced with proof of the zero
balance must be mechanically printed
on the scale ticket or other permanent
record that must be attached to the
grower’s copy of the scale ticket.
(vi) An onboard weighing system
must be level and locked in position
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and zero balanced prior to weighing.
The date and time the onboard scale is
balanced with proof of the zero balance
must be mechanically printed on the
scale ticket or other permanent record
that must be attached to the grower’s
copy of the scale ticket. When more
than one grower’s feed is weighed, the
preceding grower’s gross weight can be
used for the next grower’s tare weight,
and can be repeated until the unit is
full.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) When returned feed from a
contract poultry grower is picked up
and weighed on an onboard weighing
system, the weight of the feed must be
recorded and a ticket printed. That
weight must be used as the tare weight
when feed from another contract poultry
grower is picked up on the same load.
The procedure must be followed each
time another grower’s feed is added to
the load.
*
*
*
*
*
Marianne Plaus,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–20320 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 161
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1024]
RIN 1625–AB81
Vessel Traffic Service Updates,
Including Establishment of Vessel
Traffic Service Requirements for Port
Arthur, Texas and Expansion of VTS
Special Operating Area in Puget Sound
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is revising
and updating the Vessel Traffic Service
(VTS) regulations in 33 CFR Part 161.
The revision makes participation in the
VTS in Port Arthur, TX mandatory and
expands it to include Lake Charles, LA;
consolidates and expands a VTS Special
Area in Puget Sound, WA; adds the
designated frequencies for the Maritime
Mobile Service Identifiers (MMSIs) for
Louisville, KY and Los Angeles/Long
Beach, CA; and updates the definitions
and references in Sailing Plan
requirements. The changes made by this
rule will align regulations with the
current operating procedures of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
VTSs affected, with the benefit of
creating regulatory efficiency.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2011–1024 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1024 in the ‘‘Search’’ box,
and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Mike Sollosi, Office of
Navigation Systems (CG–NAV), Coast
Guard; telephone 202–372–1545, email
Mike.M.Sollosi@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Ms. Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Basis and Purpose
III. Background
IV. Regulatory History
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Abbreviations
AIS Automatic Identification System
FR Federal Register
MMSI Maritime Mobile Service Identifier
NDG National Dialogue Group
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PAWSA Port and Waterway Safety
Assessment
PAWSS Port and Waterways Safety System
PWSA Ports and Waterways Safety Act
SOLAS International Convention for the
Safety of Life at Sea
U.S.C. United States Code
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking
VMRS Vessel Movement Reporting System
VTM Vessel Traffic Management
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
VTS
Vessel Traffic Service
II. Basis and Purpose
This final rule is issued, pursuant to
the Ports and Waterways Safety Act
(PWSA) (33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), to
establish VTSs in the United States.
Title I of the PWSA authorizes the
Secretary of Homeland Security
(Secretary) to promulgate regulations to
establish and maintain VTSs consisting
of measures for controlling or
supervising vessel traffic to protect the
marine environment. As amended by
section 4107(a)(1) and (2) of the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C.
1223(a)(1) and (2)), the PWSA gives the
Secretary the authority to create, operate
and expand VTSs and to make
participation in the VTS mandatory for
appropriate vessels.
This final rule changes VTS Port
Arthur from a voluntary compliance
system to a mandatory compliance
system and also expands the VTS Port
Arthur area to include Lake Charles, LA.
The Coast Guard decided on this course
of action due to the findings of the Port
and Waterways Safety Assessments
(PAWSAs) that were conducted in Port
Arthur, TX in 1999 and in Lake Charles,
LA in 2000, which indicated that a VTS
is a necessary risk mitigation tool.
Additionally, due to increased vessel
traffic in Puget Sound, WA, this final
rule modifies and expands the current
VTS Special Area to include the waters
of Bellingham Bay, western Padilla Bay
and the Saddlebag route that is located
east of Guemes Island, in the vicinity of
Vendovi Island. Those categories of
vessels, defined in 33 CFR 161.16 and
161.55, that operate in this single
consolidated VTS Special Area will be
subject to the VTS Special Area
operating requirements of 33 CFR
161.13.
Finally, this rule makes two minor
updates to the VTS regulations in 33
CFR 161.12 and 161.19, respectively.
The first update adds Marine Mobile
Service Identifier (MMSI) numbers for
VTSs Los Angeles/Long Beach and
Louisville. As described in footnote 1 of
Table 161.12(c), an MMSI is a unique
nine-digit number assigned to ship
stations, ship earth stations, coast
stations, coast earth stations, and group
calls for use by a digital selective calling
(DSC) radio, an INMARSAT ship earth
station, or Automatic Identification
System (AIS). In short, an MMSI
number is essentially a call sign that
mariners use to identify those stations.
The first update also amends footnote 1
of Table 161.12(c) for the purpose of
establishing that the addition of MMSI
numbers to VTSs Louisville and Los
Angeles-Long Beach does not, through
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51665
this rulemaking, impose AIS equipment
carriage requirements for vessels
operating in those areas for the reasons
explained under the ‘‘Regulatory
History’’ of this preamble. The second
update, an edit to Sailing Plan
requirements in 33 CFR 161.19, replaces
an outdated reference to Dangerous
cargo with an updated reference to
Certain dangerous cargo, as defined in
33 CFR 160.204.
III. Background
In the late 1990s, the Coast Guard
convened a national dialogue group
(NDG) comprised of maritime and
waterway community stakeholders to
identify the needs of waterway users
with respect to Vessel Traffic
Management (VTM) and VTS systems.
Those stakeholders, representing port
authorities, pilots, environmental
conservationists, the Coast Guard, and
all major sectors of the U.S. and foreign
flag shipping industry were tasked to
identify the information needs of
waterway users to help ensure safe
passage, help establish a process to
identify candidate waterways for VTM
improvements and VTS installations,
and identify the basic elements of a
VTS. The intent of the NDG was to
provide the foundation for an approach
to VTM that would meet the
stakeholders’ shared objective of
improving vessel traffic safety in U.S.
ports and waterways in a
technologically sound and cost-effective
way.
A major outcome of the NDG was the
development of the PAWSA process,
which the Coast Guard established to
open a dialogue with waterway users
and port stakeholders to help identify
needed VTM improvements, and to
determine candidate VTS waterways.
The PAWSA process provides a formal
structure for identifying risk factors and
evaluating potential mitigation
measures. The process requires the
participation of experienced waterway
users having local expertise in
navigation, waterway conditions, and
port safety. In addition, the Coast Guard
includes non-maritime industry
stakeholders in the process to ensure
that important environmental, public
safety, and economic considerations are
given appropriate attention as riskmitigation measures are selected.
The Coast Guard has conducted 47
PAWSA workshops in U.S. ports since
1999, when the PAWSA process was
developed, including one in Port
Arthur, TX, on September 21–23, 1999,
and one in Lake Charles, LA, on April
25–26, 2000. The Port Arthur, TX and
Lake Charles, LA PAWSA reports are
publicly available on the NAVCEN Web
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
51666
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
site at https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/
?pageName=pawsaFinalReports and in
the docket for this rulemaking (USCG–
2011–1024). Based on the mitigation
recommendations contained in these
PAWSA reports, as well as the existence
of port infrastructure to support VTS
efforts, the Coast Guard determined that
Port Arthur, TX and Lake Charles, LA
have a valid need for a Coast Guardoperated VTS.
As a result of the Port Arthur PAWSA
workshop, which determined that a VTS
would provide the greatest potential to
mitigate risk in the port, the Coast
Guard added Port Arthur to the Port and
Waterways Safety System (PAWSS)
acquisition project. The PAWSS
project’s goal was to install a computerbased VTM system in VTS ports.
Installation of the VTS system in Port
Arthur, TX began in 2004 and finished
in February 2006.
Although this rule changes VTS Port
Arthur from a voluntary system to a
mandatory compliance system for
vessels transiting VTS Port Arthur, it
does not alter vessel operations nor
impose new costs on industry or the
Coast Guard because, under 33 CFR
164.46(a)(3), all vessels which would be
affected by changing VTS Port Arthur to
a mandatory VTS system are already
required to be equipped with AIS.
Because AIS carriage requirements are
the sole cost item for vessels to comply
with VTS requirements; have been in
force since December 31, 2004; and
currently include the VTS Port Arthur
area under Table 161.12(c) in 33 CFR
161.12; we have determined that
changing VTS Port Arthur to a
mandatory VTS will not alter current
vessel operations or impose new costs
on either the industry or the Coast
Guard. This final rule also expands the
currently voluntary VTS Port Arthur
area to include Lake Charles, LA. The
2000 Lake Charles PAWSA study
supported the establishment of a VTS in
Lake Charles, LA. Coast Guard data
pertaining to commercial vessel
activities indicate that commercial
vessels that transit the expansion area of
Lake Charles, LA also satisfy the AIS
carriage requirements established under
33 CFR 164.46(a)(3).
In addition to making participation in
VTS Port Arthur mandatory, this final
rule consolidates and expands the two
VTS Special Areas in Puget Sound, WA.
A VTS Special Area is defined in 33
CFR 161.2 as ‘‘a waterway within a VTS
area in which special operating
requirements apply.’’ The Coast Guard
typically institutes a VTS Special Area
when geographic or other conditions,
such as a concentration of vessels or
vessels carrying particularly hazardous
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
cargoes, make a portion of the waterway
an inherently dangerous navigational
area.
When the federal regulations for
vessel traffic services were first
implemented in 1994 (59 FR 36316, July
15, 1994), the Coast Guard instituted
two VTS Special Areas within VTS
Puget Sound. These VTS Special Areas
serve to avoid having large vessels
impeding, meeting, overtaking or
crossing each other in the constricted
waters between the San Juan Islands in
Puget Sound, WA. In addition to the
two existing VTS Special Areas in Puget
Sound, special operating requirements
have traditionally been issued in the
expansion area by VTS Puget Sound due
to the relatively restricted nature of
these waters. This final rule
incorporates the waters of the two
existing VTS Special Areas and the
waters currently covered by these
special operating requirements into a
single consolidated VTS Special Area.
Because this final rule consolidates
existing vessel operating procedures
within VTS Puget Sound, the Coast
Guard does not anticipate that the
expansion of this VTS Special Area will
alter current vessel operations or impose
new regulatory costs on industry. The
consolidation simplifies compliance
with these traffic management
requirements by consolidating them into
one.
and 164.46 of this subchapter and
generally apply in those areas denoted
with an MMSI number. However,
because we did not intend to impose
AIS carriage requirements through this
rulemaking for VTS Louisville and VTS
Los Angeles/Long Beach, we amended
footnote 1 of Table 161.12(c) to
specifically remove AIS requirements
for vessels operating in those VTS areas.
We received no comments on the NPRM
or on the correction. No public meeting
was requested and none was held.
IV. Regulatory History
On September 10, 2012, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register entitled, ‘‘Vessel Traffic Service
Updates, Including Establishment of
Vessel Traffic Service Requirements for
Port Arthur, Texas and Expansion of
VTS Special Operating Area in Puget
Sound’’ (77 FR 55439). The Coast Guard
followed the publication of the NPRM
with a correction on October 18, 2012
with the same title (77 FR 64076). In the
correction, we explained that because
adding MMSI designations to VTS
Louisville and VTS Los Angeles-Long
Beach would prematurely 1 impose AIS
equipment costs for owners and
operators of the vessel types identified
in 33 CFR 164.46(a)(3), the Coast Guard
was issuing a correction in order to
remove AIS carriage equipment
requirements for vessels operating in
those two Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)
areas. AIS carriage equipment
requirements are set forth in §§ 161.21
V. Discussion of Comments and
Changes
We did not receive any comments or
requests for a public meeting during the
NPRM’s 90-day comment period that
ended on December 10, 2012. After
publication of the NPRM, we noticed
that the coordinates of the monitoring
areas printed in regulations at Table
161.12(c), and §§ 161.55 and 161.70 are
formatted inconsistently. In this final
rule, therefore, we are reformatting the
coordinates contained in Table
161.12(c) and §§ 161.55 and 161.70 so
that all coordinates are consistently
represented in a format that includes
‘‘degree-minute-decimal.’’ Additionally,
we are reformatting an entry in Table
161.12(c) specific to the St. Mary’s River
for greater clarity. This reformatting
does not alter the location or position of
the monitoring area specific to the St.
Mary’s River. As an example to show
this, we have uploaded a chart of the St.
Mary’s River from De Tour Passage to
Munuscong Lake to the public docket.
Because none of the changes to the
coordinates in Table 161.12(c) and
§§ 161.55 and 161.70 alter the location
or position of any of the monitoring
areas set forth in regulation, the changes
are not substantive. A supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
is, therefore, unnecessary and would
delay completion of this rulemaking.
Thus, we find good cause under 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(B) to proceed with
publication of this final rule without an
SNPRM. Other than these formatting
corrections to the coordinates listed in
the monitoring areas under Table
161.12(c) and §§ 161.55 and 161.70, no
changes to the rule have been made and
the text of the final rule is the same as
the text in the NPRM and in the
correction to the NPRM. For a complete
discussion of the rule, please see the
discussion included in the NPRM at 77
FR 55439.
1 On December 16, 2008, the Coast Guard
published a NPRM entitled Vessel Requirements for
Notices of Arrival and Departure, and Automatic
Identification System. In this NPRM, the Coast
Guard proposes to expand AIS applicability to all
U.S. navigable waters. (73 FR 76295).
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
based on several of these statutes or
executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’) and 13563
(‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review’’) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This final
rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the final rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
We received no public comments,
additional information, or data that
would alter our assessment of the
NPRM. Therefore, we adopt the
Preliminary Regulatory Analysis for the
NPRM as final. A summary of the
analysis follows:
This final rule establishes mandatory
participation for the VTS area in Port
Arthur, TX, and includes Lake Charles,
LA as part of this VTS area. This rule
also consolidates and expands the VTS
Special Areas in the area of Puget
Sound, WA to include Bellingham
51667
Channel, western Padilla Bay and the
Saddlebag route east of Guemes Island.
The VTS in Port Arthur, TX was
installed in 2004 and became fully
operational in February 2006. Currently
VTS Port Arthur operates as a voluntary
system. This rule makes participation in
the VTS mandatory for all vessels that
are required to carry AIS equipment.
Because AIS carriage is required by
regulation under 33 CFR 164.46 for
commercial vessels, including those
vessels that would be affected by this
rule, we expect that there would not be
additional costs to either industry or
government resulting from this rule. A
list of the categories of commercial
vessels and the dates of compliance for
AIS carriage are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1—COMMERCIAL VESSELS: AIS CARRIAGE REQUIREMENTS
Class of vessel
AIS currently required
Self-propelled vessels 65 feet or more in length in commercial service and on
an international voyage (excludes passenger and fishing vessels).
Passenger vessels of 150 gross tons or more on an international voyage ........
Tankers on international voyages, regardless of tonnage ...................................
Vessels of 50,000 gross tons or more, other than tankers or passenger ships,
on international voyages.
Vessels of 300 gross tons or more but less than 50,000 gross tons, other than
tankers or passenger ships, on international voyages.
Self-propelled vessels of 65 feet or more in length in commercial service (excludes fishing vessels and passenger vessels certificated to carry less than
151 passengers for hire).
Towing vessels of 26 feet or more in length and more than 600 horsepower in
commercial service.
Passenger vessels certificated to carry more than 150 passengers for hire ......
Yes ........................................................
December 31, 2004.
Yes ........................................................
Yes ........................................................
Yes ........................................................
July 1, 2003.
July 1, 2003.
July 1, 2004.
Yes ........................................................
December 31, 2004.
Yes, when operating in a VTS or Vessel Movement Reporting System
(VMRS).
Yes, when operating in a VTS or
VMRS.
Yes, when operating in a VTS or
VMRS.
No.
December 31, 2004.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Fishing vessels .....................................................................................................
The principal benefits of changing
VTS participation from voluntary to
mandatory will be to codify current
practices and to provide VTS Port
Arthur with full VTS authorities to
direct and manage traffic.
The final rule also consolidates and
slightly expands the current VTS
Special Area in the VTS Puget Sound
area. This rule expands the zone in
which VTS personnel control entry into
and movement within the Special Area.
VTS Puget Sound has imposed
operating conditions in this
consolidated VTS Special Area since the
VTS national regulations were
established in 1994. The final rule
simply codifies into regulation the
current practices already in place in the
consolidated VTS Special Area and will
not result in additional requirements for
vessels.
Due to the constricted waters within
the San Juan Islands, special operating
requirements have been instituted since
the VTS national regulations were first
implemented in 1994 to avoid the risk
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
of large vessels meeting, overtaking or
crossing in this area. VTS Puget Sound
has consistently issued measures or
directions to enhance navigation and
vessel safety by imposing special
operating requirements for all vessels
operating in Bellingham Channel,
western Padilla Bay, and the Saddlebag
route east of Guemes Island and in the
vicinity of Vendovi Island due to the
relatively restricted nature of these
waters. Therefore, we do not expect that
the expansion of this VTS Special Area
will alter vessel operations.
Other minor administrative changes
include updating the table in 33 CFR
161.12(c) to include the MMSI numbers
for VTS Los Angeles/Long Beach and
VTS Louisville. Updating the table to
add these MMSI numbers will not result
in any costs for vessel owners or
operators, because this final rule revises
Note 1 to Table 161.12(c) to specifically
exclude users of VTS Louisville and
VTS Los Angeles/Long Beach from AIS
carriage equipment requirements. This
final rule also amends 33 CFR 161.19(f)
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Compliance date
December 31, 2004.
December 31, 2004.
by changing the reference from
‘‘Dangerous cargo . . . as defined in 33
CFR 160.203’’ to ‘‘Certain dangerous
cargo . . . as defined in 33 CFR
160.204.’’ The final rule also removes
the references to §§ 160.211 and 160.213
because these sections no longer exist in
the CFR. We expect these administrative
changes to result in no additional costs
to the public or industry.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The AIS carriage requirements were
implemented by a prior regulation in 33
CFR 164.46, and all vessels which will
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
51668
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
be required to participate in the VTS are
currently equipped to follow the
regulations of their individual VTS
areas. In addition, the consolidation and
slight expansion of the VTS Special
Area in Puget Sound, WA merely
codifies current operational practices,
and will result in no additional
equipment requirements. As a result, we
expect that this final rule will not
impose additional costs on vessel
owners and operators transiting within
the VTS areas of either Port Arthur, TX
or Puget Sound, WA.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). Vessels affected by this rule will
already be covered under OMB
collection of information 1625–0112.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
described in the Executive Order. Our
analysis follows.
Title I of the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act (PWSA) (33 U.S.C. 1221 et
seq.) authorizes the Secretary to issue
regulations to establish and maintain
vessel traffic services consisting of
measures for controlling or supervising
vessel traffic to protect the marine
environment. By enacting the PWSA in
1972, Congress declared that advance
planning and consultation with the
affected States and other stakeholders is
necessary when developing measures
for the control or supervision of vessel
traffic or for protecting navigation or the
marine environment. Throughout the
development of each of the subject VTSs
the Coast Guard has consulted with the
pertinent State and/or local government
entities as well as the affected pilots’
associations, vessel operators, VTS
users, and all affected stakeholders,
using Port and Waterways Safety
Assessments. This interaction is more
fully described elsewhere in this
document.
The Coast Guard has determined, after
considering the factors developed by the
Supreme Court in the consolidated
cases of United States v. Locke and
Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89, 120
S.Ct. 1135 (March 6, 2000), that by
enacting Chapter 25 of the PWSA,
Congress intended to preempt the field
of vessel traffic services in United States
ports and waterways. Therefore, the
regulations in this rulemaking have
preemptive impact over any State laws
or regulations that may be enacted on
the same subject matter. The preemptive
impact of this final rule is codified in 33
CFR 161.6.
While it is well settled that States may
not regulate in categories in which
Congress intended the Coast Guard to be
the sole source of a vessel’s obligations,
the Coast Guard recognizes the key role
that State and local governments may
have in making regulatory
determinations. Additionally, Sections 4
and 6 of Executive Order 13132 require
that for any rules with preemptive
effect, the Coast Guard will provide
elected officials of affected State and
local governments and their
representative national organizations,
notice and opportunity for appropriate
participation in any rulemaking
proceedings, and to consult with such
officials early in the rulemaking process.
The Coast Guard invited affected State
and local governments and their
representative national organizations to
indicate their desire for participation
and consultation in this rulemaking
process by submitting comments. We
received no comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
51669
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 161
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs agencies to use voluntary
consensus standards in their regulatory
activities unless the agency provides
Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule is
categorically excluded under section
2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraphs (34)(a) and
(i) of the Instruction. This rule involves
administrative changes, changing
regulations in aid of navigation, and
updating vessel traffic services. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
Harbors, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 161 as follows:
PART 161—VESSEL TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
1. The authority citation for part 161
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
70114, 70119; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat.
2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 161.12, revise Table 161.12(c)
to read as follows:
■
§ 161.12
*
*
Vessel operating requirements.
*
*
*
TABLE 161.12(C)—VTS AND VMRS CENTERS, CALL SIGNS/MMSI, DESIGNATED FREQUENCIES, AND MONITORING AREAS
Designated frequency
(Channel designation)—
purpose 2
Monitoring Area 3 4
Berwick Bay—003669950:
Berwick Traffic ..............................
156.550 MHz (Ch. 11) ...
The waters south of 29°45.00′ N., west of 91°10.00′ W., north of 29°37.00′
N., and east of 91°18.00′ W.
Buzzards Bay:
Buzzards Bay Control 5 .................
156.600 MHz (Ch. 12) ...
Houston-Galveston—003669954 .........
.........................................
Houston Traffic ..............................
156.550 MHz (Ch. 11) ...
156.250 MHz (Ch. 5A).
—For Sailing Plans
only.
156.600 MHz (Ch. 12) ...
156.250 MHz (Ch. 5A).
—For Sailing Plans
only.
The waters east and north of a line drawn from the southern tangent of
Sakonnet Point, Rhode Island, in approximate position latitude 41°27.20′
N., longitude 70°11.70′ W., to the Buzzards Bay Entrance Light in approximate position latitude 41°23.50′ N., longitude 71°02.00′ W., and then
to the southwestern tangent of Cuttyhunk Island, Massachusetts, at approximate position latitude 41°24.60′ N., longitude 70°57.00′ W., and including all of the Cape Cod Canal to its eastern entrance, except that the
area of New Bedford harbor within the confines (north of) the hurricane
barrier, and the passages through the Elizabeth Islands, is not considered
to be ‘‘Buzzards Bay’’.
The navigable waters north of 29°00.00′ N., west of 94°20.00′ W., south of
29°49.00′ N., and east of 95°20.00′ W.
The navigable waters north of a line extending due west from the southernmost end of Exxon Dock #1 (20°43.37′ N., 95°01.27′ W.).
Houston Traffic ..............................
Los Angeles-Long Beach—03660465:
San Pedro Traffic ..........................
156.700 MHz (Ch. 14) ...
Vessel Movement Reporting System Area: The navigable waters within a
25 nautical mile radius of Point Fermin Light (33°42.30′ N., 118°17.60′
W.).
Louisville—003669732:
Louisville Traffic ............................
156.650 MHz (Ch. 13) ...
The waters of the Ohio River between McAlpine Locks (Mile 606) and
Twelve Mile Island (Mile 593), only when the McAlpine upper pool gauge
is at approximately 13.0 feet or above.
Lower Mississippi River—0036699952:
New Orleans Traffic ......................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Center MMSI 1
Call Sign
156.550 MHz (Ch. 11) ...
New Orleans Traffic ......................
156.600 MHz ..................
(Ch. 12) ..........................
The navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River below 29°55.30′ N.,
89°55.60′ W. (Saxonholm Light) at 86.0 miles Above Head of Passes
(AHP), extending down river to Southwest Pass, and, within a 12 nautical
mile radius around 28°54.30′ N., 89°25.70′ W. (Southwest Pass Entrance
Light) at 20.1 miles Below Head of Passes.
The navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River bounded on the north
by a line drawn perpendicular on the river at 29°55.50′ N., 90°12.77′ W.
(Upper Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0 miles AHP and on the south by a line
drawn perpendicularly at 29°55.30′ N., 89°55.60′ W. (Saxonholm Light) at
86.0 miles AHP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
The navigable waters south of a line extending due west from the southernmost end of Exxon Dock #1 (29°43.37′ N., 95°01.27′ W.).
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
51670
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 161.12(C)—VTS AND VMRS CENTERS, CALL SIGNS/MMSI, DESIGNATED FREQUENCIES, AND MONITORING
AREAS—Continued
Designated frequency
(Channel designation)—
purpose 2
Center MMSI 1
Call Sign
New Orleans Traffic ......................
New York—003669951:
New York Traffic ...........................
156.250 MHz ..................
(Ch. 05A) ........................
The navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River below 30°38.70′ N.,
91°17.50′ W. (Port Hudson Light) at 254.5 miles AHP bounded on the
south by a line drawn perpendicular on the river at 29°55.50′ N.,
90°12.77′ W. (Upper Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0 miles AHP.
156.550 MHz ..................
(Ch. 11) ..........................
—For Sailing Plans
only.
156.600 MHz
(Ch. 12). .........................
—For vessels at anchor.
The area consists of the navigable waters of the Lower New York Bay
bounded on the east by a line drawn from Norton Point to Breezy Point;
on the south by a line connecting the entrance buoys at the Ambrose
Channel, Swash Channel, and Sandy Hook Channel to Sandy Hook
Point; and on the southeast including the waters of Sandy Hook Bay
south to a line drawn at latitude 40°25.00′ N.; then west in the Raritan
Bay to the Raritan River Railroad Bridge, then north into waters of the Arthur Kill and Newark Bay to the Lehigh Valley Draw Bridge at latitude
40°41.90′ N.; and then east including the waters of the Kill Van Kull and
the Upper New York Bay north to a line drawn east-west from the Holland Tunnel ventilator shaft at latitude 40°43.70′ N., longitude 74°01.60′
W., in the Hudson River; and then continuing east including the waters of
the East River to the Throgs Neck Bridge, excluding the Harlem River.
The navigable waters of the Lower New York Bay west of a line drawn from
Norton Point to Breezy Point; and north of a line connecting the entrance
buoys of Ambrose Channel, Swash Channel, and Sandy Hook Channel,
to Sandy Hook Point; on the southeast including the waters of the Sandy
Hook Bay south to a line drawn at latitude 40°25.00′ N.; then west into
the waters of Raritan Bay East Reach to a line drawn from Great Kills
Light south through Raritan Bay East Reach LGB #14 to Comfort PT, NJ;
then north including the waters of the Upper New York Bay south of
40°42.40′ N. (Brooklyn Bridge) and 40°43.70′ N. (Holland Tunnel Ventilator Shaft); west through the KVK into the Arthur Kill north of 40°38.25′
N. (Arthur Kill Railroad Bridge); then north into the waters of the Newark
Bay, south of 40°41.95′ N. (Lehigh Valley Draw Bridge).
The navigable waters of the Raritan Bay south to a line drawn at latitude
40°26.00′ N.; then west of a line drawn from Great Kills Light south
through the Raritan Bay East Reach LGB #14 to Point Comfort, NJ; then
west to the Raritan River Railroad Bridge; and north including the waters
of the Arthur Kill to 40°28.25′ N. (Arthur Kill Railroad Bridge); including
the waters of the East River north of 40°42.40′ N. (Brooklyn Bridge) to
the Throgs Neck Bridge, excluding the Harlem River.
New York Traffic ...........................
156.700 MHz ..................
(Ch. 14) ..........................
New York Traffic ...........................
156.600 MHz ..................
(Ch. 12) ..........................
Port Arthur—003669955:
Port Arthur Traffic .........................
156.050 MHz ..................
(Ch. 01A) ........................
Port Arthur Traffic .........................
156.275 MHz ..................
(Ch. 65A) ........................
Port Arthur Traffic .........................
156.675 MHz ..................
(Ch. 73) 6 ........................
Prince William Sound—003669958:
Valdez Traffic ................................
Puget Sound: 7
Seattle Traffic—003669957 ..........
The navigable waters south of 61°05.00′ N., east of 147°20.00′ W., north of
60°00.00′ N., and west of 146°30.00′ W.; and, all navigable waters in Port
Valdez.
156.700 MHz ..................
(Ch. 14) ..........................
The waters of Puget Sound, Hood Canal and adjacent waters south of a
line connecting Nodule Point and Bush Point in Admiralty Inlet and south
of a line drawn due east from the southernmost tip of Possession Point
on Whidbey Island to the shoreline.
The waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca east of 124°40.00′ W. excluding
the waters in the central portion of the Strait of Juan de Fuca north and
east of Race Rocks; the navigable waters of the Strait of Georgia east of
122°52.00′ W.; the San Juan Island Archipelago, Rosario Strait, Bellingham Bay; Admiralty Inlet north of a line connecting Nodule Point and
Bush Point and all waters east of Whidbey Island north of a line drawn
due east from the southernmost tip of Possession Point on Whidbey Island to the shoreline.
The waters west of 124°40.00′ W. within 50 nautical miles of the coast of
Vancouver Island including the waters north of 48°00.00′ N., and east of
127°00.00′ W.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
156.250 MHz ..................
(Ch. 5A) ..........................
Tofino Traffic—003160012 ...........
156.725 MHz ..................
(Ch. 74) ..........................
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
The navigable waters of the Sabine-Neches Canal south of 29°52.70′ N.;
Port Arthur Canal; Sabine Pass Channel; Sabine Bank Channel; Sabine
Outer Bar Channel; the offshore safety fairway; and the ICW from High
Island to its intersection with the Sabine-Neches Canal.
The navigable waters of the Neches River; Sabine River; and SabineNeches Waterway north of 29°52.70′ N.; and the ICW from its intersection with the Sabine River to MM 260.
The navigable waters of the Calcasieu Channel; Calcasieu River Channel;
and the ICW from MM 260 to MM 191.
156.650 MHz ..................
(CH. 13) ..........................
Seattle Traffic—003669957 ..........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Monitoring Area 3 4
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
51671
TABLE 161.12(C)—VTS AND VMRS CENTERS, CALL SIGNS/MMSI, DESIGNATED FREQUENCIES, AND MONITORING
AREAS—Continued
Designated frequency
(Channel designation)—
purpose 2
Center MMSI 1
Call Sign
Victoria Traffic—003160010 .........
San Francisco—003669956:
San Francisco Traffic ....................
San Francisco Traffic ....................
St. Mary’s River—003669953:
Soo Traffic ....................................
Monitoring Area 3 4
156.550 MHz ..................
(Ch. 11) ..........................
The waters of the Strait of Georgia west of 122°52.00′ W., the navigable
waters of the central Strait of Juan de Fuca north and east of Race
Rocks, including the Gulf Island Archipelago, Boundary Pass and Haro
Strait.
156.700 MHz ..................
(Ch. 14) ..........................
The navigable waters of the San Francisco Offshore Precautionary Area,
the navigable waters shoreward of the San Francisco Offshore Precautionary Area east of 122°42.00′ W. and north of 37°40.00′ N. extending eastward through the Golden Gate, and the navigable waters of San
Francisco Bay and as far east as the port of Stockton on the San Joaquin
River, as far north as the port of Sacramento on the Sacramento River.
The navigable waters within a 38 nautical mile radius of Mount Tamalpais
(37°55.80′ N., 122°34.60′ W.) west of 122°42.00′ W. and south of
37°40.00′ N. and excluding the San Francisco Offshore Precautionary
Area.
156.600 MHz ..................
(Ch. 12) ..........................
156.600 MHz ..................
(Ch. 12) ..........................
The waters of the St. Mary’s River and lower Whitefish Bay from 45°57.00′
N. (De Tour Reef Light) to the south, to 46°38.70′ N. (Ile Parisienne
Light) to the north, except the waters of the St. Mary’s Falls Canal and to
the east along a line from La Pointe to Sims Point, within Potagannissing
Bay and Worsley Bay.
Notes:
1 Maritime Mobile Service Identifier (MMSI) is a unique nine-digit number assigned that identifies ship stations, ship earth stations, coast stations, coast earth stations, and group calls for use by a digital selective calling (DSC) radio, an INMARSAT ship earth station or AIS. AIS requirements are set forth in §§ 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter. The requirements set forth in §§ 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter apply in
those areas denoted with an MMSI number, except for Louisville and Los Angeles/Long Beach.
2 In the event of a communication failure, difficulties or other safety factors, the Center may direct or permit a user to monitor and report on any
other designated monitoring frequency or the bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Channel 13) or 156.375 MHz (Channel 67),
to the extent that doing so provides a level of safety beyond that provided by other means. The bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650
MHz (Ch. 13) is used in certain monitoring areas where the level of reporting does not warrant a designated frequency.
3 All geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) are expressed in North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
4 Some monitoring areas extend beyond navigable waters. Although not required, users are strongly encouraged to maintain a listening watch
on the designated monitoring frequency in these areas. Otherwise, they are required to maintain watch as stated in 47 CFR 80.148.
5 In addition to the vessels denoted in Section 161.16 of this chapter, requirements set forth in subpart B of 33 CFR part 161 also apply to any
vessel transiting VMRS Buzzards Bay required to carry a bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone by part 26 of this chapter.
6 Until otherwise directed, full VTS services will not be available in the Calcasieu Channel, Calcasieu River Channel, and the ICW from MM
260 to MM 191. Vessels may contact Port Arthur Traffic on the designated VTS frequency to request advisories, but are not required to monitor
the VTS frequency in this sector.
7 A Cooperative Vessel Traffic Service was established by the United States and Canada within adjoining waters. The appropriate Center administers the rules issued by both nations; however, enforces only its own set of rules within its jurisdiction. Note, the bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Ch. 13), is not so designated in Canadian waters, therefore users are encouraged and permitted to make passing arrangements on the designated monitoring frequencies.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 161.19, revise paragraph (f) to
read as follows:
■
§ 161.19
Sailing Plan (SP).
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Certain dangerous cargo on board
or in its tow, as defined in § 160.204 of
this subchapter.
■ 4. In § 161.55, revise paragraph (b)
and paragraph (c) introductory text to
read as follows:
§ 161.55 Vessel Traffic Service Puget
Sound and the Cooperative Vessel Traffic
Service for the Juan de Fuca Region.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) VTS Special Area: The Eastern San
Juan Island Archipelago VTS Special
Area consists of all waters of the eastern
San Juan Island Archipelago including:
Rosario Strait bounded to the south by
latitude 48°26.40′ N. (the center of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Precautionary Area ‘‘RB’’) extending
from Lopez Island to Fidalgo Island, and
to the north by latitude 48°40.57′ N. (the
center of the Precautionary Area ‘‘C’’)
extending from Orcas Island to Lummi
Island; Guemes Channel; Bellingham
Channel; Padilla Bay and southern
Bellingham Bay (Samish Bay) south of
latitude 48°38.42′N.
Note: The center of precautionary area
‘‘RB’’ is not marked by a buoy. All
precautionary areas are depicted on National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) nautical charts.
(c) Additional VTS Special Area
Operating Requirements. The following
additional requirements are applicable
in the Eastern San Juan Island
Archipelago VTS Special Area:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Add § 161.70 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 161.70
Vessel Traffic Service Port Arthur.
(a) The VTS area consists of the
navigable waters of the United States to
the limits of the territorial seas bound
by the following points: 30°10.00′ N.,
92°37.00′ W.; then south to 29°10.00′ N.,
92°37.00′ W.; then west to 29°10.00′ N.,
93°52.25′ W.; then northwest to
29°33.70′ N., 94°21.25′ W.; then north to
30°10.00′ N., 94°21.25′ W.; then east
along the 30°10′ N. latitude to the
origination point.
Note: Although mandatory participation in
VTS Port Arthur is limited to the area within
the navigable waters of the United States,
prospective users are encouraged to report at
the safe water marks in order to facilitate
vessel traffic management in the VTS Area
and to receive advisories or navigational
assistance.
(b) Precautionary areas.
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
51672
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 161.70(B)—VTS PORT ARTHUR PRECAUTIONARY AREAS
Precautionary area name
Petco Bend (1) ............................................................................................................................
Black Bayou (1) ...........................................................................................................................
Orange Cut (1) ............................................................................................................................
Neches River Intersection (1) .....................................................................................................
Texaco Island Intersection (1) .....................................................................................................
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Center point
latitude
Radius
Sabine-Neches Waterway .........................................................................................................
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
Center point
longitude
yds
yds
yds
yds
yds
30°00.80′
30°00.00′
30°03.25′
29°58.10′
29°49.40′
93°57.60′
93°46.20′
93°43.20′
93°51.25′
94°57.55′
W.
W.
W.
W.
W.
N/A
All waters of the Sabine-Neches
Waterway between the Texaco Island Precautionary Area and the
Humble Island Precautionary Area.
1 Precautionary Area encompasses a circular area of the radius denoted around the center point with the exception of the Sabine-Neches
Waterway.
(c) Reporting points (Inbound).
TABLE 161.70(C)—INBOUND
Designator
Geographic name
Geographic description
1 ...............
Sabine Bank Channel ‘‘SB’’ Buoy ..............
Sabine Bank Sea Buoy ..............................
2 ...............
Sabine Pass Buoys ‘‘29/30’’ .......................
Sabine Pass Buoys ‘‘29/30’’ .......................
3 ...............
Port Arthur Canal Light ‘‘43’’ ......................
Keith Lake ...................................................
4 ...............
North Forty GIWW Mile 279 .......................
North Forty ..................................................
5 ...............
FINA Highline Neches River Light ‘‘19’’ .....
FINA Highline .............................................
6 ...............
Ready Reserve Fleet Highline ...................
Channel at Cove Mid-Point ........................
7 ...............
Sabine River MM 268 .................................
268 Highline ................................................
Latitude/
longitude
29°25.00′
93°40.00′
29°35.90′
93°48.20′
29°46.50′
93°56.47′
29°56.40′
93°52.10′
29°59.10′
93°54.30′
30°00.80′
93°59.90′
30°02.20′
93°44.30′
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
Notes
Sailing Plan Report
(d) Reporting points (Outbound).
TABLE 161.70(D)—OUTBOUND
Geographic name
Geographic description
1 ...............
Sabine River Light ‘‘2’’ ................................
Black Bayou ................................................
2 ...............
Ready Reserve Fleet Highline ...................
Channel at Cove Mid-Point ........................
3 ...............
FINA Highline Neches River Light ‘‘19’’ .....
FINA Highline .............................................
4 ...............
GIWW Mile 285 ..........................................
The School House ......................................
5 ...............
Port Arthur Canal Light ‘‘43’’ ......................
Keith Lake ...................................................
6 ...............
Sabine Pass Buoys ‘‘29/30’’ .......................
Sabine Pass Buoys ‘‘29/30’’ .......................
7 ...............
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Designator
Sabine Bank Channel ‘‘SB’’ Buoy ..............
Sabine Bank Sea Buoy ..............................
Latitude/
longitude
30°00.00′
93°46.25′
30°00.80′
93°59.90′
29°59.09′
93°54.30′
29°52.70′
93°55.55′
29°46.50′
93°56.47′
29°35.90′
93°48.20′
29°25.00′
93°40.00′
(e) Reporting points (Eastbound).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
Notes
Sector Shift
Final Report
51673
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 161.70(e)—EASTBOUND (ICW)
Latitude/
longitude
Designator
Geographic name
Geographic description
1 ...............
GIWW Mile 295 ..........................................
ICW MM 295 ..............................................
2 ...............
North Forty GIWW Mile 279 .......................
North Forty ..................................................
3 ...............
Sabine River MM 268 .................................
268 Highline ................................................
4 ...............
GIWW Mile 260 ..........................................
260 Highline ................................................
29°47.25′
94°01.10′
29°56.40′
93°52.10′
30°02.20′
93°44.30′
30°03.50′
93°37.50′
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
Notes
Sailing Plan Report.
Final Report.
(f) Reporting points (Westbound).
TABLE 161.70(f)—WESTBOUND (ICW)
Latitude/
longitude
Designator
Geographic name
Geographic description
1 ...............
GIWW Mile 260 ..........................................
260 Highline ................................................
2 ...............
Sabine River Light ‘‘2’’ ................................
Black Bayou ................................................
3 ...............
GIWW Mile 285 ..........................................
The School House ......................................
4 ...............
GIWW Mile 295 ..........................................
ICW MM 295 ..............................................
30°03.50′
93°37.50′
30°00.03′
93°46.18′
29°52.71′
93°55.55′
29°46.20′
94°02.60′
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
N.
W.
Notes
Sailing Plan Report.
Sector Shift.
Final Report.
(g) Reporting points (Offshore Safety
Fairway).
TABLE 161.70(g)—OFFSHORE SAFETY FAIRWAY
Latitude/
longitude
Designator
Geographic name
Geographic description
1 ...............
Sabine Pass Safety Fairway—East ...........
East Dogleg ................................................
2 ...............
Sabine Pass Safety Fairway—West ..........
West Dogleg ...............................................
Dated: August 14, 2013.
Scott J. Smith,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Director,
Marine Transportation Systems.
[FR Doc. 2013–20399 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective August 21, 2013.
DATES:
38 CFR Parts 51, 52, and 58
Technical Changes To Remove Forms
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is making technical
changes to remove from its regulations
a series of forms related to VA payments
for care provided to veterans at State
homes. Official forms are not required to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Aug 20, 2013
Jo
Anne Parker, Geriatrics and Extended
Care Service (10NC4), Veterans Health
Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–
1785. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 6, 2000, VA added 38 CFR part
58 to the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) for the express purpose of making
it easier to find the forms required by 38
CFR part 51, Per Diem for Nursing
Home Care of Veterans in State Homes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RIN 2900–AO69
ACTION:
be reproduced in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), and all VA forms are
more readily available on VA Web sites.
Removing these forms from the CFR is
an administrative action and will not
impact the ability of the public to
comment on any amendments to the
information collections contained in
these forms.
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29°35.00′
93°28.00′
29°28.00′
93°58.00′
Notes
N.
W.
N.
W.
65 FR 962, Jan. 6, 2000. Since that time,
VA, State home program participants
and administrators, and the general
public have increasingly come to rely on
VA’s Publications Web site (https://
www.va.gov/vaforms) as the primary
resource for VA forms. Most of the
forms in part 58 are used by the State
homes in order to comply with VA
regulations in 38 CFR parts 51 and 52.
All of these State homes have Internet
access, and the forms are also available
at all VA medical centers.
In addition, several forms currently
found in part 58 have been superseded,
and the current forms are readily
available for printing, downloading, or
online submission on the VA
Publications Web site. Updated versions
are available on the Web site
immediately—whereas the CFR is
updated only once per year. Removing
the forms from the CFR will ensure that
the CFR does not reference and depict
outdated forms. We are, therefore,
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51664-51673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20399]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 161
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1024]
RIN 1625-AB81
Vessel Traffic Service Updates, Including Establishment of Vessel
Traffic Service Requirements for Port Arthur, Texas and Expansion of
VTS Special Operating Area in Puget Sound
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is revising and updating the Vessel Traffic
Service (VTS) regulations in 33 CFR Part 161. The revision makes
participation in the VTS in Port Arthur, TX mandatory and expands it to
include Lake Charles, LA; consolidates and expands a VTS Special Area
in Puget Sound, WA; adds the designated frequencies for the Maritime
Mobile Service Identifiers (MMSIs) for Louisville, KY and Los Angeles/
Long Beach, CA; and updates the definitions and references in Sailing
Plan requirements. The changes made by this rule will align regulations
with the current operating procedures of the
[[Page 51665]]
VTSs affected, with the benefit of creating regulatory efficiency.
DATES: This final rule is effective September 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2011-1024 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet by going to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2011-1024 in the ``Search'' box, and then clicking
``Search.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Mike Sollosi, Office of Navigation Systems (CG-NAV),
Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1545, email Mike.M.Sollosi@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Ms. Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Basis and Purpose
III. Background
IV. Regulatory History
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
AIS Automatic Identification System
FR Federal Register
MMSI Maritime Mobile Service Identifier
NDG National Dialogue Group
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PAWSA Port and Waterway Safety Assessment
PAWSS Port and Waterways Safety System
PWSA Ports and Waterways Safety Act
SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea
U.S.C. United States Code
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
VMRS Vessel Movement Reporting System
VTM Vessel Traffic Management
VTS Vessel Traffic Service
II. Basis and Purpose
This final rule is issued, pursuant to the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act (PWSA) (33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), to establish VTSs in the
United States. Title I of the PWSA authorizes the Secretary of Homeland
Security (Secretary) to promulgate regulations to establish and
maintain VTSs consisting of measures for controlling or supervising
vessel traffic to protect the marine environment. As amended by section
4107(a)(1) and (2) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C.
1223(a)(1) and (2)), the PWSA gives the Secretary the authority to
create, operate and expand VTSs and to make participation in the VTS
mandatory for appropriate vessels.
This final rule changes VTS Port Arthur from a voluntary compliance
system to a mandatory compliance system and also expands the VTS Port
Arthur area to include Lake Charles, LA. The Coast Guard decided on
this course of action due to the findings of the Port and Waterways
Safety Assessments (PAWSAs) that were conducted in Port Arthur, TX in
1999 and in Lake Charles, LA in 2000, which indicated that a VTS is a
necessary risk mitigation tool.
Additionally, due to increased vessel traffic in Puget Sound, WA,
this final rule modifies and expands the current VTS Special Area to
include the waters of Bellingham Bay, western Padilla Bay and the
Saddlebag route that is located east of Guemes Island, in the vicinity
of Vendovi Island. Those categories of vessels, defined in 33 CFR
161.16 and 161.55, that operate in this single consolidated VTS Special
Area will be subject to the VTS Special Area operating requirements of
33 CFR 161.13.
Finally, this rule makes two minor updates to the VTS regulations
in 33 CFR 161.12 and 161.19, respectively. The first update adds Marine
Mobile Service Identifier (MMSI) numbers for VTSs Los Angeles/Long
Beach and Louisville. As described in footnote 1 of Table 161.12(c), an
MMSI is a unique nine-digit number assigned to ship stations, ship
earth stations, coast stations, coast earth stations, and group calls
for use by a digital selective calling (DSC) radio, an INMARSAT ship
earth station, or Automatic Identification System (AIS). In short, an
MMSI number is essentially a call sign that mariners use to identify
those stations. The first update also amends footnote 1 of Table
161.12(c) for the purpose of establishing that the addition of MMSI
numbers to VTSs Louisville and Los Angeles-Long Beach does not, through
this rulemaking, impose AIS equipment carriage requirements for vessels
operating in those areas for the reasons explained under the
``Regulatory History'' of this preamble. The second update, an edit to
Sailing Plan requirements in 33 CFR 161.19, replaces an outdated
reference to Dangerous cargo with an updated reference to Certain
dangerous cargo, as defined in 33 CFR 160.204.
III. Background
In the late 1990s, the Coast Guard convened a national dialogue
group (NDG) comprised of maritime and waterway community stakeholders
to identify the needs of waterway users with respect to Vessel Traffic
Management (VTM) and VTS systems. Those stakeholders, representing port
authorities, pilots, environmental conservationists, the Coast Guard,
and all major sectors of the U.S. and foreign flag shipping industry
were tasked to identify the information needs of waterway users to help
ensure safe passage, help establish a process to identify candidate
waterways for VTM improvements and VTS installations, and identify the
basic elements of a VTS. The intent of the NDG was to provide the
foundation for an approach to VTM that would meet the stakeholders'
shared objective of improving vessel traffic safety in U.S. ports and
waterways in a technologically sound and cost-effective way.
A major outcome of the NDG was the development of the PAWSA
process, which the Coast Guard established to open a dialogue with
waterway users and port stakeholders to help identify needed VTM
improvements, and to determine candidate VTS waterways. The PAWSA
process provides a formal structure for identifying risk factors and
evaluating potential mitigation measures. The process requires the
participation of experienced waterway users having local expertise in
navigation, waterway conditions, and port safety. In addition, the
Coast Guard includes non-maritime industry stakeholders in the process
to ensure that important environmental, public safety, and economic
considerations are given appropriate attention as risk-mitigation
measures are selected.
The Coast Guard has conducted 47 PAWSA workshops in U.S. ports
since 1999, when the PAWSA process was developed, including one in Port
Arthur, TX, on September 21-23, 1999, and one in Lake Charles, LA, on
April 25-26, 2000. The Port Arthur, TX and Lake Charles, LA PAWSA
reports are publicly available on the NAVCEN Web
[[Page 51666]]
site at https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=pawsaFinalReports and in
the docket for this rulemaking (USCG-2011-1024). Based on the
mitigation recommendations contained in these PAWSA reports, as well as
the existence of port infrastructure to support VTS efforts, the Coast
Guard determined that Port Arthur, TX and Lake Charles, LA have a valid
need for a Coast Guard-operated VTS.
As a result of the Port Arthur PAWSA workshop, which determined
that a VTS would provide the greatest potential to mitigate risk in the
port, the Coast Guard added Port Arthur to the Port and Waterways
Safety System (PAWSS) acquisition project. The PAWSS project's goal was
to install a computer-based VTM system in VTS ports. Installation of
the VTS system in Port Arthur, TX began in 2004 and finished in
February 2006.
Although this rule changes VTS Port Arthur from a voluntary system
to a mandatory compliance system for vessels transiting VTS Port
Arthur, it does not alter vessel operations nor impose new costs on
industry or the Coast Guard because, under 33 CFR 164.46(a)(3), all
vessels which would be affected by changing VTS Port Arthur to a
mandatory VTS system are already required to be equipped with AIS.
Because AIS carriage requirements are the sole cost item for vessels to
comply with VTS requirements; have been in force since December 31,
2004; and currently include the VTS Port Arthur area under Table
161.12(c) in 33 CFR 161.12; we have determined that changing VTS Port
Arthur to a mandatory VTS will not alter current vessel operations or
impose new costs on either the industry or the Coast Guard. This final
rule also expands the currently voluntary VTS Port Arthur area to
include Lake Charles, LA. The 2000 Lake Charles PAWSA study supported
the establishment of a VTS in Lake Charles, LA. Coast Guard data
pertaining to commercial vessel activities indicate that commercial
vessels that transit the expansion area of Lake Charles, LA also
satisfy the AIS carriage requirements established under 33 CFR
164.46(a)(3).
In addition to making participation in VTS Port Arthur mandatory,
this final rule consolidates and expands the two VTS Special Areas in
Puget Sound, WA. A VTS Special Area is defined in 33 CFR 161.2 as ``a
waterway within a VTS area in which special operating requirements
apply.'' The Coast Guard typically institutes a VTS Special Area when
geographic or other conditions, such as a concentration of vessels or
vessels carrying particularly hazardous cargoes, make a portion of the
waterway an inherently dangerous navigational area.
When the federal regulations for vessel traffic services were first
implemented in 1994 (59 FR 36316, July 15, 1994), the Coast Guard
instituted two VTS Special Areas within VTS Puget Sound. These VTS
Special Areas serve to avoid having large vessels impeding, meeting,
overtaking or crossing each other in the constricted waters between the
San Juan Islands in Puget Sound, WA. In addition to the two existing
VTS Special Areas in Puget Sound, special operating requirements have
traditionally been issued in the expansion area by VTS Puget Sound due
to the relatively restricted nature of these waters. This final rule
incorporates the waters of the two existing VTS Special Areas and the
waters currently covered by these special operating requirements into a
single consolidated VTS Special Area. Because this final rule
consolidates existing vessel operating procedures within VTS Puget
Sound, the Coast Guard does not anticipate that the expansion of this
VTS Special Area will alter current vessel operations or impose new
regulatory costs on industry. The consolidation simplifies compliance
with these traffic management requirements by consolidating them into
one.
IV. Regulatory History
On September 10, 2012, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register entitled, ``Vessel
Traffic Service Updates, Including Establishment of Vessel Traffic
Service Requirements for Port Arthur, Texas and Expansion of VTS
Special Operating Area in Puget Sound'' (77 FR 55439). The Coast Guard
followed the publication of the NPRM with a correction on October 18,
2012 with the same title (77 FR 64076). In the correction, we explained
that because adding MMSI designations to VTS Louisville and VTS Los
Angeles-Long Beach would prematurely \1\ impose AIS equipment costs for
owners and operators of the vessel types identified in 33 CFR
164.46(a)(3), the Coast Guard was issuing a correction in order to
remove AIS carriage equipment requirements for vessels operating in
those two Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) areas. AIS carriage equipment
requirements are set forth in Sec. Sec. 161.21 and 164.46 of this
subchapter and generally apply in those areas denoted with an MMSI
number. However, because we did not intend to impose AIS carriage
requirements through this rulemaking for VTS Louisville and VTS Los
Angeles/Long Beach, we amended footnote 1 of Table 161.12(c) to
specifically remove AIS requirements for vessels operating in those VTS
areas. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the correction. No
public meeting was requested and none was held.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On December 16, 2008, the Coast Guard published a NPRM
entitled Vessel Requirements for Notices of Arrival and Departure,
and Automatic Identification System. In this NPRM, the Coast Guard
proposes to expand AIS applicability to all U.S. navigable waters.
(73 FR 76295).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
We did not receive any comments or requests for a public meeting
during the NPRM's 90-day comment period that ended on December 10,
2012. After publication of the NPRM, we noticed that the coordinates of
the monitoring areas printed in regulations at Table 161.12(c), and
Sec. Sec. 161.55 and 161.70 are formatted inconsistently. In this
final rule, therefore, we are reformatting the coordinates contained in
Table 161.12(c) and Sec. Sec. 161.55 and 161.70 so that all
coordinates are consistently represented in a format that includes
``degree-minute-decimal.'' Additionally, we are reformatting an entry
in Table 161.12(c) specific to the St. Mary's River for greater
clarity. This reformatting does not alter the location or position of
the monitoring area specific to the St. Mary's River. As an example to
show this, we have uploaded a chart of the St. Mary's River from De
Tour Passage to Munuscong Lake to the public docket. Because none of
the changes to the coordinates in Table 161.12(c) and Sec. Sec. 161.55
and 161.70 alter the location or position of any of the monitoring
areas set forth in regulation, the changes are not substantive. A
supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) is, therefore,
unnecessary and would delay completion of this rulemaking. Thus, we
find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(B) to proceed with publication of
this final rule without an SNPRM. Other than these formatting
corrections to the coordinates listed in the monitoring areas under
Table 161.12(c) and Sec. Sec. 161.55 and 161.70, no changes to the
rule have been made and the text of the final rule is the same as the
text in the NPRM and in the correction to the NPRM. For a complete
discussion of the rule, please see the discussion included in the NPRM
at 77 FR 55439.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
[[Page 51667]]
based on several of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and
13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. This final rule has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the final rule has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
We received no public comments, additional information, or data
that would alter our assessment of the NPRM. Therefore, we adopt the
Preliminary Regulatory Analysis for the NPRM as final. A summary of the
analysis follows:
This final rule establishes mandatory participation for the VTS
area in Port Arthur, TX, and includes Lake Charles, LA as part of this
VTS area. This rule also consolidates and expands the VTS Special Areas
in the area of Puget Sound, WA to include Bellingham Channel, western
Padilla Bay and the Saddlebag route east of Guemes Island.
The VTS in Port Arthur, TX was installed in 2004 and became fully
operational in February 2006. Currently VTS Port Arthur operates as a
voluntary system. This rule makes participation in the VTS mandatory
for all vessels that are required to carry AIS equipment.
Because AIS carriage is required by regulation under 33 CFR 164.46
for commercial vessels, including those vessels that would be affected
by this rule, we expect that there would not be additional costs to
either industry or government resulting from this rule. A list of the
categories of commercial vessels and the dates of compliance for AIS
carriage are shown in Table 1.
Table 1--Commercial Vessels: AIS Carriage Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class of vessel AIS currently required Compliance date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-propelled vessels 65 feet or more in Yes......................... December 31, 2004.
length in commercial service and on an
international voyage (excludes passenger
and fishing vessels).
Passenger vessels of 150 gross tons or Yes......................... July 1, 2003.
more on an international voyage.
Tankers on international voyages, Yes......................... July 1, 2003.
regardless of tonnage.
Vessels of 50,000 gross tons or more, Yes......................... July 1, 2004.
other than tankers or passenger ships,
on international voyages.
Vessels of 300 gross tons or more but Yes......................... December 31, 2004.
less than 50,000 gross tons, other than
tankers or passenger ships, on
international voyages.
Self-propelled vessels of 65 feet or more Yes, when operating in a VTS December 31, 2004.
in length in commercial service or Vessel Movement
(excludes fishing vessels and passenger Reporting System (VMRS).
vessels certificated to carry less than
151 passengers for hire).
Towing vessels of 26 feet or more in Yes, when operating in a VTS December 31, 2004.
length and more than 600 horsepower in or VMRS.
commercial service.
Passenger vessels certificated to carry Yes, when operating in a VTS December 31, 2004.
more than 150 passengers for hire. or VMRS.
Fishing vessels.......................... No..........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The principal benefits of changing VTS participation from voluntary
to mandatory will be to codify current practices and to provide VTS
Port Arthur with full VTS authorities to direct and manage traffic.
The final rule also consolidates and slightly expands the current
VTS Special Area in the VTS Puget Sound area. This rule expands the
zone in which VTS personnel control entry into and movement within the
Special Area. VTS Puget Sound has imposed operating conditions in this
consolidated VTS Special Area since the VTS national regulations were
established in 1994. The final rule simply codifies into regulation the
current practices already in place in the consolidated VTS Special Area
and will not result in additional requirements for vessels.
Due to the constricted waters within the San Juan Islands, special
operating requirements have been instituted since the VTS national
regulations were first implemented in 1994 to avoid the risk of large
vessels meeting, overtaking or crossing in this area. VTS Puget Sound
has consistently issued measures or directions to enhance navigation
and vessel safety by imposing special operating requirements for all
vessels operating in Bellingham Channel, western Padilla Bay, and the
Saddlebag route east of Guemes Island and in the vicinity of Vendovi
Island due to the relatively restricted nature of these waters.
Therefore, we do not expect that the expansion of this VTS Special Area
will alter vessel operations.
Other minor administrative changes include updating the table in 33
CFR 161.12(c) to include the MMSI numbers for VTS Los Angeles/Long
Beach and VTS Louisville. Updating the table to add these MMSI numbers
will not result in any costs for vessel owners or operators, because
this final rule revises Note 1 to Table 161.12(c) to specifically
exclude users of VTS Louisville and VTS Los Angeles/Long Beach from AIS
carriage equipment requirements. This final rule also amends 33 CFR
161.19(f) by changing the reference from ``Dangerous cargo . . . as
defined in 33 CFR 160.203'' to ``Certain dangerous cargo . . . as
defined in 33 CFR 160.204.'' The final rule also removes the references
to Sec. Sec. 160.211 and 160.213 because these sections no longer
exist in the CFR. We expect these administrative changes to result in
no additional costs to the public or industry.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The AIS carriage requirements were implemented by a prior
regulation in 33 CFR 164.46, and all vessels which will
[[Page 51668]]
be required to participate in the VTS are currently equipped to follow
the regulations of their individual VTS areas. In addition, the
consolidation and slight expansion of the VTS Special Area in Puget
Sound, WA merely codifies current operational practices, and will
result in no additional equipment requirements. As a result, we expect
that this final rule will not impose additional costs on vessel owners
and operators transiting within the VTS areas of either Port Arthur, TX
or Puget Sound, WA.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Vessels affected
by this rule will already be covered under OMB collection of
information 1625-0112.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in the Executive
Order. Our analysis follows.
Title I of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA) (33 U.S.C.
1221 et seq.) authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations to
establish and maintain vessel traffic services consisting of measures
for controlling or supervising vessel traffic to protect the marine
environment. By enacting the PWSA in 1972, Congress declared that
advance planning and consultation with the affected States and other
stakeholders is necessary when developing measures for the control or
supervision of vessel traffic or for protecting navigation or the
marine environment. Throughout the development of each of the subject
VTSs the Coast Guard has consulted with the pertinent State and/or
local government entities as well as the affected pilots' associations,
vessel operators, VTS users, and all affected stakeholders, using Port
and Waterways Safety Assessments. This interaction is more fully
described elsewhere in this document.
The Coast Guard has determined, after considering the factors
developed by the Supreme Court in the consolidated cases of United
States v. Locke and Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89, 120 S.Ct. 1135
(March 6, 2000), that by enacting Chapter 25 of the PWSA, Congress
intended to preempt the field of vessel traffic services in United
States ports and waterways. Therefore, the regulations in this
rulemaking have preemptive impact over any State laws or regulations
that may be enacted on the same subject matter. The preemptive impact
of this final rule is codified in 33 CFR 161.6.
While it is well settled that States may not regulate in categories
in which Congress intended the Coast Guard to be the sole source of a
vessel's obligations, the Coast Guard recognizes the key role that
State and local governments may have in making regulatory
determinations. Additionally, Sections 4 and 6 of Executive Order 13132
require that for any rules with preemptive effect, the Coast Guard will
provide elected officials of affected State and local governments and
their representative national organizations, notice and opportunity for
appropriate participation in any rulemaking proceedings, and to consult
with such officials early in the rulemaking process.
The Coast Guard invited affected State and local governments and
their representative national organizations to indicate their desire
for participation and consultation in this rulemaking process by
submitting comments. We received no comments.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy.
[[Page 51669]]
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the
Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation;
test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded that this
action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2-1,
paragraphs (34)(a) and (i) of the Instruction. This rule involves
administrative changes, changing regulations in aid of navigation, and
updating vessel traffic services. An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 161
Harbors, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 161 as follows:
PART 161--VESSEL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 161 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 70114, 70119; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 161.12, revise Table 161.12(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 161.12 Vessel operating requirements.
* * * * *
Table 161.12(c)--VTS and VMRS Centers, Call Signs/MMSI, Designated Frequencies, and Monitoring Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designated frequency
Center MMSI \1\ Call Sign (Channel designation)-- Monitoring Area 3 4
purpose \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Berwick Bay--003669950:
Berwick Traffic..................... 156.550 MHz (Ch. 11)....... The waters south of 29[deg]45.00' N.,
west of 91[deg]10.00' W., north of
29[deg]37.00' N., and east of
91[deg]18.00' W.
Buzzards Bay:
Buzzards Bay Control \5\............ 156.600 MHz (Ch. 12)....... The waters east and north of a line drawn
from the southern tangent of Sakonnet
Point, Rhode Island, in approximate
position latitude 41[deg]27.20' N.,
longitude 70[deg]11.70' W., to the
Buzzards Bay Entrance Light in
approximate position latitude
41[deg]23.50' N., longitude
71[deg]02.00' W., and then to the
southwestern tangent of Cuttyhunk
Island, Massachusetts, at approximate
position latitude 41[deg]24.60' N.,
longitude 70[deg]57.00' W., and
including all of the Cape Cod Canal to
its eastern entrance, except that the
area of New Bedford harbor within the
confines (north of) the hurricane
barrier, and the passages through the
Elizabeth Islands, is not considered to
be ``Buzzards Bay''.
Houston-Galveston--003669954............ ........................... The navigable waters north of
29[deg]00.00' N., west of 94[deg]20.00'
W., south of 29[deg]49.00' N., and east
of 95[deg]20.00' W.
Houston Traffic..................... 156.550 MHz (Ch. 11)....... The navigable waters north of a line
156.250 MHz (Ch. 5A)....... extending due west from the southernmost
--For Sailing Plans only... end of Exxon Dock 1
(20[deg]43.37' N., 95[deg]01.27' W.).
Houston Traffic..................... 156.600 MHz (Ch. 12)....... The navigable waters south of a line
156.250 MHz (Ch. 5A)....... extending due west from the southernmost
--For Sailing Plans only... end of Exxon Dock 1
(29[deg]43.37' N., 95[deg]01.27' W.).
Los Angeles-Long Beach--03660465:
San Pedro Traffic................... 156.700 MHz (Ch. 14)....... Vessel Movement Reporting System Area:
The navigable waters within a 25
nautical mile radius of Point Fermin
Light (33[deg]42.30' N., 118[deg]17.60'
W.).
Louisville--003669732:
Louisville Traffic.................. 156.650 MHz (Ch. 13)....... The waters of the Ohio River between
McAlpine Locks (Mile 606) and Twelve
Mile Island (Mile 593), only when the
McAlpine upper pool gauge is at
approximately 13.0 feet or above.
Lower Mississippi River--0036699952:
New Orleans Traffic................. 156.550 MHz (Ch. 11)....... The navigable waters of the Lower
Mississippi River below 29[deg]55.30'
N., 89[deg]55.60' W. (Saxonholm Light)
at 86.0 miles Above Head of Passes
(AHP), extending down river to Southwest
Pass, and, within a 12 nautical mile
radius around 28[deg]54.30' N.,
89[deg]25.70' W. (Southwest Pass
Entrance Light) at 20.1 miles Below Head
of Passes.
New Orleans Traffic................. 156.600 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Lower
(Ch. 12)................... Mississippi River bounded on the north
by a line drawn perpendicular on the
river at 29[deg]55.50' N., 90[deg]12.77'
W. (Upper Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0
miles AHP and on the south by a line
drawn perpendicularly at 29[deg]55.30'
N., 89[deg]55.60' W. (Saxonholm Light)
at 86.0 miles AHP.
[[Page 51670]]
New Orleans Traffic................. 156.250 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Lower
(Ch. 05A).................. Mississippi River below 30[deg]38.70'
N., 91[deg]17.50' W. (Port Hudson Light)
at 254.5 miles AHP bounded on the south
by a line drawn perpendicular on the
river at 29[deg]55.50' N., 90[deg]12.77'
W. (Upper Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0
miles AHP.
New York--003669951:
New York Traffic.................... 156.550 MHz................ The area consists of the navigable waters
(Ch. 11)................... of the Lower New York Bay bounded on the
--For Sailing Plans only... east by a line drawn from Norton Point
156.600 MHz................ to Breezy Point; on the south by a line
(Ch. 12)................... connecting the entrance buoys at the
--For vessels at anchor.... Ambrose Channel, Swash Channel, and
Sandy Hook Channel to Sandy Hook Point;
and on the southeast including the
waters of Sandy Hook Bay south to a line
drawn at latitude 40[deg]25.00' N.; then
west in the Raritan Bay to the Raritan
River Railroad Bridge, then north into
waters of the Arthur Kill and Newark Bay
to the Lehigh Valley Draw Bridge at
latitude 40[deg]41.90' N.; and then east
including the waters of the Kill Van
Kull and the Upper New York Bay north to
a line drawn east-west from the Holland
Tunnel ventilator shaft at latitude
40[deg]43.70' N., longitude
74[deg]01.60' W., in the Hudson River;
and then continuing east including the
waters of the East River to the Throgs
Neck Bridge, excluding the Harlem River.
New York Traffic.................... 156.700 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Lower New
(Ch. 14)................... York Bay west of a line drawn from
Norton Point to Breezy Point; and north
of a line connecting the entrance buoys
of Ambrose Channel, Swash Channel, and
Sandy Hook Channel, to Sandy Hook Point;
on the southeast including the waters of
the Sandy Hook Bay south to a line drawn
at latitude 40[deg]25.00' N.; then west
into the waters of Raritan Bay East
Reach to a line drawn from Great Kills
Light south through Raritan Bay East
Reach LGB 14 to Comfort PT, NJ;
then north including the waters of the
Upper New York Bay south of
40[deg]42.40' N. (Brooklyn Bridge) and
40[deg]43.70' N. (Holland Tunnel
Ventilator Shaft); west through the KVK
into the Arthur Kill north of
40[deg]38.25' N. (Arthur Kill Railroad
Bridge); then north into the waters of
the Newark Bay, south of 40[deg]41.95'
N. (Lehigh Valley Draw Bridge).
New York Traffic.................... 156.600 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Raritan Bay
(Ch. 12)................... south to a line drawn at latitude
40[deg]26.00' N.; then west of a line
drawn from Great Kills Light south
through the Raritan Bay East Reach LGB
14 to Point Comfort, NJ; then
west to the Raritan River Railroad
Bridge; and north including the waters
of the Arthur Kill to 40[deg]28.25' N.
(Arthur Kill Railroad Bridge); including
the waters of the East River north of
40[deg]42.40' N. (Brooklyn Bridge) to
the Throgs Neck Bridge, excluding the
Harlem River.
Port Arthur--003669955:
Port Arthur Traffic................. 156.050 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Sabine-Neches
(Ch. 01A).................. Canal south of 29[deg]52.70' N.; Port
Arthur Canal; Sabine Pass Channel;
Sabine Bank Channel; Sabine Outer Bar
Channel; the offshore safety fairway;
and the ICW from High Island to its
intersection with the Sabine-Neches
Canal.
Port Arthur Traffic................. 156.275 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Neches River;
(Ch. 65A).................. Sabine River; and Sabine-Neches Waterway
north of 29[deg]52.70' N.; and the ICW
from its intersection with the Sabine
River to MM 260.
Port Arthur Traffic................. 156.675 MHz................ The navigable waters of the Calcasieu
(Ch. 73) \6\............... Channel; Calcasieu River Channel; and
the ICW from MM 260 to MM 191.
Prince William Sound--003669958:
Valdez Traffic...................... 156.650 MHz................ The navigable waters south of
(CH. 13)................... 61[deg]05.00' N., east of 147[deg]20.00'
W., north of 60[deg]00.00' N., and west
of 146[deg]30.00' W.; and, all navigable
waters in Port Valdez.
Puget Sound: \7\
Seattle Traffic--003669957......... 156.700 MHz................ The waters of Puget Sound, Hood Canal and
(Ch. 14)................... adjacent waters south of a line
connecting Nodule Point and Bush Point
in Admiralty Inlet and south of a line
drawn due east from the southernmost tip
of Possession Point on Whidbey Island to
the shoreline.
Seattle Traffic--003669957.......... 156.250 MHz................ The waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca
(Ch. 5A)................... east of 124[deg]40.00' W. excluding the
waters in the central portion of the
Strait of Juan de Fuca north and east of
Race Rocks; the navigable waters of the
Strait of Georgia east of 122[deg]52.00'
W.; the San Juan Island Archipelago,
Rosario Strait, Bellingham Bay;
Admiralty Inlet north of a line
connecting Nodule Point and Bush Point
and all waters east of Whidbey Island
north of a line drawn due east from the
southernmost tip of Possession Point on
Whidbey Island to the shoreline.
Tofino Traffic--003160012........... 156.725 MHz................ The waters west of 124[deg]40.00' W.
(Ch. 74)................... within 50 nautical miles of the coast of
Vancouver Island including the waters
north of 48[deg]00.00' N., and east of
127[deg]00.00' W.
[[Page 51671]]
Victoria Traffic--003160010......... 156.550 MHz................ The waters of the Strait of Georgia west
(Ch. 11)................... of 122[deg]52.00' W., the navigable
waters of the central Strait of Juan de
Fuca north and east of Race Rocks,
including the Gulf Island Archipelago,
Boundary Pass and Haro Strait.
San Francisco--003669956:
San Francisco Traffic............... 156.700 MHz................ The navigable waters of the San Francisco
(Ch. 14)................... Offshore Precautionary Area, the
navigable waters shoreward of the San
Francisco Offshore Precautionary Area
east of 122[deg]42.00' W. and north of
37[deg]40.00' N. extending eastward
through the Golden Gate, and the
navigable waters of San Francisco Bay
and as far east as the port of Stockton
on the San Joaquin River, as far north
as the port of Sacramento on the
Sacramento River.
San Francisco Traffic............... 156.600 MHz................ The navigable waters within a 38 nautical
(Ch. 12)................... mile radius of Mount Tamalpais
(37[deg]55.80' N., 122[deg]34.60' W.)
west of 122[deg]42.00' W. and south of
37[deg]40.00' N. and excluding the San
Francisco Offshore Precautionary Area.
St. Mary's River--003669953:
Soo Traffic......................... 156.600 MHz................ The waters of the St. Mary's River and
(Ch. 12)................... lower Whitefish Bay from 45[deg]57.00'
N. (De Tour Reef Light) to the south, to
46[deg]38.70' N. (Ile Parisienne Light)
to the north, except the waters of the
St. Mary's Falls Canal and to the east
along a line from La Pointe to Sims
Point, within Potagannissing Bay and
Worsley Bay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Maritime Mobile Service Identifier (MMSI) is a unique nine-digit number assigned that identifies ship
stations, ship earth stations, coast stations, coast earth stations, and group calls for use by a digital
selective calling (DSC) radio, an INMARSAT ship earth station or AIS. AIS requirements are set forth in Sec.
Sec. 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter. The requirements set forth in Sec. Sec. 161.21 and 164.46 of
this subchapter apply in those areas denoted with an MMSI number, except for Louisville and Los Angeles/Long
Beach.
\2\ In the event of a communication failure, difficulties or other safety factors, the Center may direct or
permit a user to monitor and report on any other designated monitoring frequency or the bridge-to-bridge
navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Channel 13) or 156.375 MHz (Channel 67), to the extent that doing so
provides a level of safety beyond that provided by other means. The bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency,
156.650 MHz (Ch. 13) is used in certain monitoring areas where the level of reporting does not warrant a
designated frequency.
\3\ All geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) are expressed in North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
\4\ Some monitoring areas extend beyond navigable waters. Although not required, users are strongly encouraged
to maintain a listening watch on the designated monitoring frequency in these areas. Otherwise, they are
required to maintain watch as stated in 47 CFR 80.148.
\5\ In addition to the vessels denoted in Section 161.16 of this chapter, requirements set forth in subpart B of
33 CFR part 161 also apply to any vessel transiting VMRS Buzzards Bay required to carry a bridge-to-bridge
radiotelephone by part 26 of this chapter.
\6\ Until otherwise directed, full VTS services will not be available in the Calcasieu Channel, Calcasieu River
Channel, and the ICW from MM 260 to MM 191. Vessels may contact Port Arthur Traffic on the designated VTS
frequency to request advisories, but are not required to monitor the VTS frequency in this sector.
\7\ A Cooperative Vessel Traffic Service was established by the United States and Canada within adjoining
waters. The appropriate Center administers the rules issued by both nations; however, enforces only its own
set of rules within its jurisdiction. Note, the bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Ch. 13),
is not so designated in Canadian waters, therefore users are encouraged and permitted to make passing
arrangements on the designated monitoring frequencies.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 161.19, revise paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 161.19 Sailing Plan (SP).
* * * * *
(f) Certain dangerous cargo on board or in its tow, as defined in
Sec. 160.204 of this subchapter.
0
4. In Sec. 161.55, revise paragraph (b) and paragraph (c) introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 161.55 Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound and the Cooperative
Vessel Traffic Service for the Juan de Fuca Region.
* * * * *
(b) VTS Special Area: The Eastern San Juan Island Archipelago VTS
Special Area consists of all waters of the eastern San Juan Island
Archipelago including: Rosario Strait bounded to the south by latitude
48[deg]26.40' N. (the center of the Precautionary Area ``RB'')
extending from Lopez Island to Fidalgo Island, and to the north by
latitude 48[deg]40.57' N. (the center of the Precautionary Area ``C'')
extending from Orcas Island to Lummi Island; Guemes Channel; Bellingham
Channel; Padilla Bay and southern Bellingham Bay (Samish Bay) south of
latitude 48[deg]38.42'N.
Note: The center of precautionary area ``RB'' is not marked by a
buoy. All precautionary areas are depicted on National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) nautical charts.
(c) Additional VTS Special Area Operating Requirements. The
following additional requirements are applicable in the Eastern San
Juan Island Archipelago VTS Special Area:
* * * * *
0
5. Add Sec. 161.70 to read as follows:
Sec. 161.70 Vessel Traffic Service Port Arthur.
(a) The VTS area consists of the navigable waters of the United
States to the limits of the territorial seas bound by the following
points: 30[deg]10.00' N., 92[deg]37.00' W.; then south to 29[deg]10.00'
N., 92[deg]37.00' W.; then west to 29[deg]10.00' N., 93[deg]52.25' W.;
then northwest to 29[deg]33.70' N., 94[deg]21.25' W.; then north to
30[deg]10.00' N., 94[deg]21.25' W.; then east along the 30[deg]10' N.
latitude to the origination point.
Note: Although mandatory participation in VTS Port Arthur is
limited to the area within the navigable waters of the United
States, prospective users are encouraged to report at the safe water
marks in order to facilitate vessel traffic management in the VTS
Area and to receive advisories or navigational assistance.
(b) Precautionary areas.
[[Page 51672]]
Table 161.70(b)--VTS Port Arthur Precautionary Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precautionary area name Radius Center point latitude Center point longitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petco Bend \(1)\..................... 2000 yds 30[deg]00.80' N. 93[deg]57.60' W.
Black Bayou \(1)\.................... 2000 yds 30[deg]00.00' N. 93[deg]46.20' W.
Orange Cut \(1)\..................... 2000 yds 30[deg]03.25' N. 93[deg]43.20' W.
Neches River Intersection \(1)\...... 2000 yds 29[deg]58.10' N. 93[deg]51.25' W.
Texaco Island Intersection \(1)\..... 2000 yds 29[deg]49.40' N. 94[deg]57.55' W.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sabine-Neches Waterway............... N/A All waters of the Sabine-Neches Waterway between the Texaco
Island Precautionary Area and the Humble Island
Precautionary Area.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Precautionary Area encompasses a circular area of the radius denoted around the center point with the
exception of the Sabine-Neches Waterway.
(c) Reporting points (Inbound).
Table 161.70(c)--Inbound
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic
Designator Geographic name description Latitude/ longitude Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................. Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Bank Sea Buoy 29[deg]25.00' N. Sailing Plan Report
``SB'' Buoy. 93[deg]40.00' W.
2.................. Sabine Pass Buoys Sabine Pass Buoys 29[deg]35.90' N. ....................
``29/30''. ``29/30''. 93[deg]48.20' W.
3.................. Port Arthur Canal Keith Lake.......... 29[deg]46.50' N. ....................
Light ``43''. 93[deg]56.47' W.
4.................. North Forty GIWW North Forty......... 29[deg]56.40' N. ....................
Mile 279. 93[deg]52.10' W.
5.................. FINA Highline Neches FINA Highline....... 29[deg]59.10' N. ....................
River Light ``19''. 93[deg]54.30' W.
6.................. Ready Reserve Fleet Channel at Cove Mid- 30[deg]00.80' N. ....................
Highline. Point. 93[deg]59.90' W.
7.................. Sabine River MM 268. 268 Highline........ 30[deg]02.20' N. ....................
93[deg]44.30' W.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Reporting points (Outbound).
Table 161.70(d)--Outbound
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic
Designator Geographic name description Latitude/ longitude Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................. Sabine River Light Black Bayou......... 30[deg]00.00' N. ....................
``2''. 93[deg]46.25' W.
2.................. Ready Reserve Fleet Channel at Cove Mid- 30[deg]00.80' N. ....................
Highline. Point. 93[deg]59.90' W.
3.................. FINA Highline Neches FINA Highline....... 29[deg]59.09' N. ....................
River Light ``19''. 93[deg]54.30' W.
4.................. GIWW Mile 285....... The School House.... 29[deg]52.70' N. Sector Shift
93[deg]55.55' W.
5.................. Port Arthur Canal Keith Lake.......... 29[deg]46.50' N. ....................
Light ``43''. 93[deg]56.47' W.
6.................. Sabine Pass Buoys Sabine Pass Buoys 29[deg]35.90' N. ....................
``29/30''. ``29/30''. 93[deg]48.20' W.
7.................. Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Bank Sea Buoy 29[deg]25.00' N. Final Report
``SB'' Buoy. 93[deg]40.00' W.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Reporting points (Eastbound).
[[Page 51673]]
Table 161.70(e)--Eastbound (ICW)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic
Designator Geographic name description Latitude/ longitude Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................. GIWW Mile 295....... ICW MM 295.......... 29[deg]47.25' N. Sailing Plan Report.
94[deg]01.10' W.
2.................. North Forty GIWW North Forty......... 29[deg]56.40' N. ....................
Mile 279. 93[deg]52.10' W.
3.................. Sabine River MM 268. 268 Highline........ 30[deg]02.20' N. ....................
93[deg]44.30' W.
4.................. GIWW Mile 260....... 260 Highline........ 30[deg]03.50' N. Final Report.
93[deg]37.50' W.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(f) Reporting points (Westbound).
Table 161.70(f)--Westbound (ICW)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic
Designator Geographic name description Latitude/ longitude Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................. GIWW Mile 260....... 260 Highline........ 30[deg]03.50' N. Sailing Plan Report.
93[deg]37.50' W.
2.................. Sabine River Light Black Bayou......... 30[deg]00.03' N. ....................
``2''. 93[deg]46.18' W.
3.................. GIWW Mile 285....... The School House.... 29[deg]52.71' N. Sector Shift.
93[deg]55.55' W.
4.................. GIWW Mile 295....... ICW MM 295.......... 29[deg]46.20' N. Final Report.
94[deg]02.60' W.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) Reporting points (Offshore Safety Fairway).
Table 161.70(g)--Offshore Safety Fairway
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic
Designator Geographic name description Latitude/ longitude Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................. Sabine Pass Safety East Dogleg......... 29[deg]35.00' N. ....................
Fairway--East. 93[deg]28.00' W.
2.................. Sabine Pass Safety West Dogleg......... 29[deg]28.00' N. ....................
Fairway--West. 93[deg]58.00' W.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: August 14, 2013.
Scott J. Smith,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Director, Marine Transportation
Systems.
[FR Doc. 2013-20399 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P