Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters, 51115-51117 [2013-20312]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules the maximum payout amount as determined under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section and the maximum leverage payout amount as determined under paragraph (a)(2)(vi) of this section. (2) Composition of the leverage buffer. The leverage buffer is composed solely of tier 1 capital. (3) Calculation of leverage buffer. (i) A covered BHC’s leverage buffer is equal to the covered BHC’s supplementary leverage ratio minus 3 percent, calculated as of the last day of the previous calendar quarter based on the covered BHC’s most recent Consolidated 51115 Financial Statement for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y–9C). (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section, if the covered BHC’s supplementary leverage ratio is less than or equal to 3 percent, the covered BHC’s leverage buffer is zero. TABLE 2 TO § 217.11—CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM LEVERAGE PAYOUT AMOUNT Maximum leverage payout ratio (as a percentage of eligible retained income) Leverage buffer Greater than 2.0 percent ................................................................................................................................................ Less Less Less Less than than than than or or or or equal equal equal equal to to to to 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 percent, and greater than 1.5 percent .................................................................................. percent, and greater than 1.0 percent .................................................................................. percent, and greater than 0.5 percent .................................................................................. percent .................................................................................................................................. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 12 CFR chapter III Authority and Issuance For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation proposes to add part 324 of chapter III of Title 12, Code of Federal Regulations to read as follows: PART 324—CAPITAL ADEQUACY Sec. Subparts A–G [Reserved] Subpart H—Prompt Corrective Action 324.403 Capital measures and capital category definitions. Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1815(a), 1815(b), 1816, 1818(a), 1818(b), 1818(c), 1818(t), 1819(Tenth), 1828(c), 1828(d), 1828(i), 1828(n), 1828(o), 1831o, 1835, 3907, 3909, 4808; 5371; 5412; Pub. L. 102–233, 105 Stat. 1761, 1789, 1790 (12 U.S.C. 1831n note); Pub. L. 102–242, 105 Stat. 2236, 2355, as amended by Pub. L. 103–325, 108 Stat. 2160, 2233 (12 U.S.C. 1828 note); Pub. L. 102–242, 105 Stat. 2236, 2386, as amended by Pub. L. 102–550, 106 Stat. 3672, 4089 (12 U.S.C. 1828 note); Pub. L. 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1887 (15 U.S.C. 78o–7 note). Subparts A–G [Reserved] Subpart H—Prompt Corrective Action sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS § 324.403 Capital measures and capital category definitions. (a) [Reserved] (b) Capital categories. For purposes of section 38 of the FDI Act and this subpart, an FDIC-supervised institution shall be deemed to be: (1) ‘‘Well capitalized’’ if it: (i) [Reserved] (ii) [Reserved] (iii) [Reserved] (iv) [Reserved] VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 (v) Beginning on January 1, 2018 and thereafter, an FDIC-supervised institution that is a subsidiary of a covered BHC will be deemed to be ‘‘well capitalized’’ if the FDIC-supervised institution satisfies paragraphs (b)(1)(i)– (iv) of this paragraph and has a supplementary leverage ratio of 6.0 percent or greater. For purposes of this paragraph, a covered BHC means a U.S. top-tier bank holding company with more than $700 billion in total assets as reported on the company’s most recent Consolidated Financial Statement for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y–9C) or more than $10 trillion in assets under custody as reported on the company’s most recent Banking Organization Systemic Risk Report (FR Y–15); and (vi) [Reserved] (2) [Reserved] Dated: July 9, 2013. Thomas J. Curry, Comptroller of the Currency. By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 8, 2013. Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary of the Board. Dated at Washington, DC, this 9th day of July, 2013. By order of the Board of Directors. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–20143 Filed 8–19–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 No payout ratio limitation applies. 60 percent. 40 percent. 20 percent. 0 percent. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2013–0737; Directorate Identifier 2012–SW–111–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and SA330J helicopters. This proposed AD would require inspecting the crimping of the ball joint of the upperand lower- end-fittings of the main servo-control and, depending on findings, replacing the main servocontrol or repairing the ball joint. This proposed AD is prompted by incidents of missing crimping on the ball joints of servo-control end-fittings. The proposed actions are intended to prevent failure of a main servo-control upper end fitting, and subsequent failure of the flight controls and loss of control of the helicopter. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 21, 2013. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Fax: 202–493–2251. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM 20AUP1 51116 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules • Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. public contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the foreign authority’s AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232– 0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https:// www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email matt.wilbanks@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Comments Invited We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 Discussion The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2012– 0248, dated November 20, 2012, to correct an unsafe condition for Eurocopter AS 332 C, AS 332 C1, AS 332 L, AS 332 L1, AS 332 L2, and SA 330 J helicopters with certain partnumbered main servo-controls installed. EASA advises that several occurrences were reported to Eurocopter of missing crimping on ball joints of servo-control end-fittings. EASA states that while slipping of the ball joint of the lower end-fitting does not affect its service life, slipping of the ball joint of the upper end-fitting can lead to a significant reduction of the service life of this end-fitting. As a result, the EASA AD requires inspecting each ball joint for crimping and, depending on the findings, replacing the main servocontrol. FAA’s Determination These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Related Service Information Eurocopter issued one Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) with three different numbers, all Revision 1, and all dated December 5, 2012. EASB No. 67.00.45 applies to civilian Model AS332C, AS332C1, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and military Model AS332B, AS332B1, AS332M, AS332M1, and AS332F1 helicopters. EASB No. 67.00.31 applies to military Model AS532AC, AS532AL, AS532SC, AS532UC, AS532UE, AS532UL, AS532A2, and AS532U2 helicopters. EASB No. 67.19 applies to civilian Model SA330J and military Model PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 SA330Ba, SA330Ca, SA330Ea, SA330L, SA330Jm, SA330S1, and SA330Sm helicopters. The EASB specifies visually checking for crimping of the ball joints of the upper- and lower- servo control end-fittings and informing the Eurocopter Technical Support Department of any ball joint that is not crimped. For an upper end-fitting ball joint that is not crimped and slips one millimeter (mm) or greater, the EASB specifies returning the servo-control for replacement of the ball joint and the end-fitting. For an upper end-fitting ball joint that is not crimped and slips less than one mm, the EASB specifies either crimping the ball joint or returning the servo-control for ball joint crimping. For a lower end-fitting ball joint that is not crimped, the EASB states to crimp the ball joint. The EASB also states that if a ball joint is crimped, no action on that ball joint is required in regard to this unsafe condition. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require visually inspecting the applicable ball joint of the upper and lower end-fittings of the main servo control for crimping. If the ball joint of the upper end-fitting is not crimped and the slipping of the ball joint is one mm or greater, then this proposed AD would require replacing the servo-control with an airworthy servo-control. If the ball joint of the upper end-fitting is not crimped and the slipping of the ball joint is less than one mm, then this proposed AD would require replacing the servo-control with an airworthy servo-control or crimping the ball joint. If the ball joint of the lower end-fitting is not crimped, this proposed AD would require crimping the ball joint. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 18 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. We estimate it would take 1 work-hour to inspect the ball joint for crimping at an average labor cost of $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, it would cost about $85 per helicopter for the inspection, or $1,530 for U.S. operators. We estimate it would take 4 work-hours to replace a servo-control and parts would cost approximately $60,358 for a total estimated cost of $60,698 for replacement. According to Eurocopter’s service information some of the costs of this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage by E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM 20AUP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules Eurocopter or UTC Actuation Systems/ Goodrich Actuation Systems. Accordingly, we have included all costs in our cost estimate. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 19, 2013 Jkt 229001 the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): ■ Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2013–0737; Directorate Identifier 2012–SW–111–AD. (a) Applicability This AD applies to the following model helicopters, certificated in any category, with a part-numbered main servo-control listed below: overhauled or repaired by UTC Actuation Systems/Goodrich Actuation Systems between June 1, 2008, and September 15, 2012, inclusive; or with a serial number listed in Appendix 1 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin Nos. 67.00.45 or 67.19, both Revision 1, and both dated December 5, 2012 (EASB): (1) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, and AS332L2 helicopters with main servocontrol, part number (P/N) SC7202, SC7202– (all dash numbers), SC7203, SC7203–(all dash numbers), SC7221, or SC7221–(all dash numbers), installed; and (2) Model SA330J helicopters with main servo-control P/N SC7111, SC7111–(all dash numbers) SC7112, or SC7112–(all dash numbers), installed. (b) Unsafe Condition This AD defines the unsafe condition as missing crimping on a ball joint of a main servo-control end-fitting. This condition could result in failure of a main servo-control upper end fitting, failure of the flight controls, and loss of control of the helicopter. 51117 (ii) Using a light source, inspect the ball joint of the lower end-fitting of the main servo-control for crimping in accordance with Detail A and Detail B, Figure 1, of the EASB applicable to your model helicopter. If the lower ball joint is not crimped, crimp the ball joint. (2) Prior to installing any servo-control that is affected by this AD, perform the required actions in accordance with paragraphs (e)(1) of this AD. (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email matt.wilbanks@faa.gov. (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC. (g) Additional Information The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2012–0248, dated November 20, 2012. You may view the EASA AD on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–2013–0737. (h) Subject Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6730, Rotor Flight Control—Rotorcraft Servo System. Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 12, 2013. Kim Smith, Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (c) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by October 21, 2013. [FR Doc. 2013–20312 Filed 8–19–13; 8:45 am] (d) Compliance You are responsible for performing each action required by this AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been accomplished prior to that time. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (e) Required Actions (1) Within 85 hours time-in-service (TIS): (i) Using a light source, inspect the ball joint of the upper end-fitting of the main servo control for crimping in accordance with Detail A and Detail B, Figure 1, of the EASB applicable to your model helicopter. (A) If the upper ball joint is not crimped and the ball joint slips a distance of 1 millimeter (mm) or greater, replace the servocontrol with an airworthy servo-control. (B) If the upper ball joint is not crimped and the ball joint slips a distance of less than 1mm, either crimp the ball joint or replace the servo-control with an airworthy servocontrol. [Docket No. FAA–2013–0698; Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–136–AD] PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: We propose to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 2006–06– 14, that applies to certain Airbus Model SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM 20AUP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51115-51117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20312]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0737; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-111-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, 
AS332L2, and SA330J helicopters. This proposed AD would require 
inspecting the crimping of the ball joint of the upper- and lower- end-
fittings of the main servo-control and, depending on findings, 
replacing the main servo-control or repairing the ball joint. This 
proposed AD is prompted by incidents of missing crimping on the ball 
joints of servo-control end-fittings. The proposed actions are intended 
to prevent failure of a main servo-control upper end fitting, and 
subsequent failure of the flight controls and loss of control of the 
helicopter.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 21, 
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your 
comments electronically.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.

[[Page 51116]]

     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the foreign 
authority's AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office 
(telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 
75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; 
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced 
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 
76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety 
Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110; 
email matt.wilbanks@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to 
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might 
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful 
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the 
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To 
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters 
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed 
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
    We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as 
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel 
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we 
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for 
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has 
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. 
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 
No. 2012-0248, dated November 20, 2012, to correct an unsafe condition 
for Eurocopter AS 332 C, AS 332 C1, AS 332 L, AS 332 L1, AS 332 L2, and 
SA 330 J helicopters with certain part-numbered main servo-controls 
installed. EASA advises that several occurrences were reported to 
Eurocopter of missing crimping on ball joints of servo-control end-
fittings. EASA states that while slipping of the ball joint of the 
lower end-fitting does not affect its service life, slipping of the 
ball joint of the upper end-fitting can lead to a significant reduction 
of the service life of this end-fitting. As a result, the EASA AD 
requires inspecting each ball joint for crimping and, depending on the 
findings, replacing the main servo-control.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of 
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to 
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical 
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in 
its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known 
relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely 
to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Related Service Information

    Eurocopter issued one Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) with 
three different numbers, all Revision 1, and all dated December 5, 
2012. EASB No. 67.00.45 applies to civilian Model AS332C, AS332C1, 
AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and military Model AS332B, AS332B1, AS332M, 
AS332M1, and AS332F1 helicopters. EASB No. 67.00.31 applies to military 
Model AS532AC, AS532AL, AS532SC, AS532UC, AS532UE, AS532UL, AS532A2, 
and AS532U2 helicopters. EASB No. 67.19 applies to civilian Model 
SA330J and military Model SA330Ba, SA330Ca, SA330Ea, SA330L, SA330Jm, 
SA330S1, and SA330Sm helicopters. The EASB specifies visually checking 
for crimping of the ball joints of the upper- and lower- servo control 
end-fittings and informing the Eurocopter Technical Support Department 
of any ball joint that is not crimped. For an upper end-fitting ball 
joint that is not crimped and slips one millimeter (mm) or greater, the 
EASB specifies returning the servo-control for replacement of the ball 
joint and the end-fitting. For an upper end-fitting ball joint that is 
not crimped and slips less than one mm, the EASB specifies either 
crimping the ball joint or returning the servo-control for ball joint 
crimping. For a lower end-fitting ball joint that is not crimped, the 
EASB states to crimp the ball joint. The EASB also states that if a 
ball joint is crimped, no action on that ball joint is required in 
regard to this unsafe condition.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require visually inspecting the applicable 
ball joint of the upper and lower end-fittings of the main servo 
control for crimping. If the ball joint of the upper end-fitting is not 
crimped and the slipping of the ball joint is one mm or greater, then 
this proposed AD would require replacing the servo-control with an 
airworthy servo-control. If the ball joint of the upper end-fitting is 
not crimped and the slipping of the ball joint is less than one mm, 
then this proposed AD would require replacing the servo-control with an 
airworthy servo-control or crimping the ball joint. If the ball joint 
of the lower end-fitting is not crimped, this proposed AD would require 
crimping the ball joint.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 18 helicopters of 
U.S. Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs 
in order to comply with this AD. We estimate it would take 1 work-hour 
to inspect the ball joint for crimping at an average labor cost of $85 
per work-hour. Based on these figures, it would cost about $85 per 
helicopter for the inspection, or $1,530 for U.S. operators. We 
estimate it would take 4 work-hours to replace a servo-control and 
parts would cost approximately $60,358 for a total estimated cost of 
$60,698 for replacement.
    According to Eurocopter's service information some of the costs of 
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the 
cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty 
coverage by

[[Page 51117]]

Eurocopter or UTC Actuation Systems/Goodrich Actuation Systems. 
Accordingly, we have included all costs in our cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is 
within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe 
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in 
this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that 
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply 
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2013-
0737; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-111-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to the following model helicopters, certificated 
in any category, with a part-numbered main servo-control listed 
below: overhauled or repaired by UTC Actuation Systems/Goodrich 
Actuation Systems between June 1, 2008, and September 15, 2012, 
inclusive; or with a serial number listed in Appendix 1 of 
Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin Nos. 67.00.45 or 67.19, 
both Revision 1, and both dated December 5, 2012 (EASB):
    (1) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, and AS332L2 helicopters with 
main servo-control, part number (P/N) SC7202, SC7202-(all dash 
numbers), SC7203, SC7203-(all dash numbers), SC7221, or SC7221-(all 
dash numbers), installed; and
    (2) Model SA330J helicopters with main servo-control P/N SC7111, 
SC7111-(all dash numbers) SC7112, or SC7112-(all dash numbers), 
installed.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as missing crimping on a 
ball joint of a main servo-control end-fitting. This condition could 
result in failure of a main servo-control upper end fitting, failure 
of the flight controls, and loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by October 21, 2013.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this 
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been 
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    (1) Within 85 hours time-in-service (TIS):
    (i) Using a light source, inspect the ball joint of the upper 
end-fitting of the main servo control for crimping in accordance 
with Detail A and Detail B, Figure 1, of the EASB applicable to your 
model helicopter.
    (A) If the upper ball joint is not crimped and the ball joint 
slips a distance of 1 millimeter (mm) or greater, replace the servo-
control with an airworthy servo-control.
    (B) If the upper ball joint is not crimped and the ball joint 
slips a distance of less than 1mm, either crimp the ball joint or 
replace the servo-control with an airworthy servo-control.
    (ii) Using a light source, inspect the ball joint of the lower 
end-fitting of the main servo-control for crimping in accordance 
with Detail A and Detail B, Figure 1, of the EASB applicable to your 
model helicopter. If the lower ball joint is not crimped, crimp the 
ball joint.
    (2) Prior to installing any servo-control that is affected by 
this AD, perform the required actions in accordance with paragraphs 
(e)(1) of this AD.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs 
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Wilbanks, Aviation Safety 
Engineer, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Rotorcraft Directorate, 
FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 
222-5110; email matt.wilbanks@faa.gov.
    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating 
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you 
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, 
the manager of the local flight standards district office or 
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft 
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety 
Agency (EASA) AD No. 2012-0248, dated November 20, 2012. You may 
view the EASA AD on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov in 
Docket No. FAA-2013-0737.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6730, Rotor Flight 
Control--Rotorcraft Servo System.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 12, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-20312 Filed 8-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.