Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New York, NY, 51061-51064 [2013-19981]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
the AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference may
be obtained at the address specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A320–53–1060, Revision 04, dated
September 13, 2012.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EIAS,
1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61
93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 26,
2013.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–20105 Filed 8–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
32 CFR Part 199
[DoD–2010–HA–0072]
RIN 0720–AB41
TRICARE; Reimbursement of Sole
Community Hospitals and Adjustment
to Reimbursement of Critical Access
Hospitals; Correction
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On Thursday, August 8, 2013
(78 FR 48303–48311), the Department of
Defense published a final rule titled
TRICARE; Reimbursement of Sole
Community Hospitals and Adjustment
to Reimbursement of Critical Access
Hospitals. Subsequent to the publication
of the final rule in the Federal Register,
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:41 Aug 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
DoD discovered two errors. This rule
corrects these errors.
DATES: Effective October 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Fazzini, TRICARE Management Activity
(TMA), Medical Benefits and
Reimbursement Branch, telephone (303)
676–3803.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
■ 1. On page 48308, in the first column,
in the fifth and sixth lines from the top,
‘‘Avera Queen of Peach’’ should read
‘‘Avera Queen of Peace.’’
■ 2. On page 48309, in Table 2, in the
State column, in the first entry, ‘‘FL’’
should read ‘‘NC.’’
Dated: August 14, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–20179 Filed 8–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0563]
RIN 1625–AA01
Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New
York, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing two special anchorage
areas, Special Anchorage Area North
and Special Anchorage Area South,
along the Hudson River adjacent to
Manhattan at the 79th Street Boat Basin;
revising the New York City Harbor
Master phone number for Sheepshead
Bay, NY; and disestablishing the
Captain of the Port New York
Commercial Mooring Buoy permit
regulations and table displaying the
mooring anchor, chain, and pendant
requirements. The Coast Guard is not
establishing two special anchorage areas
on Sandy Hook Bay or disestablishing
the western special anchorage area in
Sheepshead Bay, as originally proposed.
This action is necessary to facilitate safe
navigation in these areas and provide
safe and secure anchorages for vessels
not more than 65 feet in length. This
action is intended to increase the safety
of life and property in New York City,
improve the safety of anchored vessels,
and provide for the overall safe and
efficient flow of vessel traffic and
commerce.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51061
This rule is effective September
19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2011–0563]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard
Sector New York; telephone (718) 354–
4195, email Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil or
Lieutenant Isaac Slavitt, Waterways
Management Division at Coast Guard
First District, telephone (617) 223–8385,
email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NYC PARKS New York City Department of
Parks and Recreation
A. Regulatory History and Information
On February 6, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Special Anchorage Areas; Port
of New York, NY in the Federal Register
(77 FR 5743). We received 13 comments
on the proposed rule. A public hearing
was requested, but none was held since
the written comments clearly expressed
the views of the commenters and oral
presentations would not aid in the
rulemaking process.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is 33
U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030,
2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define anchorage grounds.
The specific reasons for this
rulemaking are requests submitted by
the local governments with jurisdiction
over the current mooring fields and
special anchorage areas to clarify their
usage. Additionally, the removal of the
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
51062
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Captain of the Port New York
Commercial Mooring Buoy permit
regulations and table § 110.155(L)(7)
displaying the mooring anchor, chain,
and pendant requirements aligns these
regulations with current U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers permitting
regulations.
The purpose of this rule is to facilitate
safe navigation in these areas and
provide safe and secure anchorages for
vessels not more than 65 feet in length,
increase the safety of life and property
in New York City, improve the safety of
anchored vessels, and provide for the
overall safe and efficient flow of vessel
traffic and commerce.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received a total of 13
comments regarding the NPRM.
No comments were received regarding
the establishment of the two special
anchorage areas, Special Anchorage
Area North and Special Anchorage Area
South along the Hudson River adjacent
to Manhattan at the 79th Street Boat
Basin.
The Coast Guard received one
comment from the U.S. Department of
the Interior stating they had no
comment at that time.
The Coast Guard received one
comment that simply restated a portion
of the proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard received ten
comments regarding the establishment
of the two special anchorage areas,
Atlantic Highland North and Atlantic
Highland South, on Sandy Hook Bay at
Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
Of the ten comments relating to the
Atlantic Highland areas, four comments
simply expressed support of
establishment of the special anchorage
areas.
Four additional comments requested
an expansion of the proposed
boundaries of the special anchorage
areas beyond the boundary initially
proposed in the NPRM. The comments
stated that the special anchorage areas
with designated vessel mooring
positions would create hazardous
conditions by transient vessels
anchoring outside of the special
anchorage areas. The comments stated
that transient vessels would deploy
anchors and chain of various lengths
within the special anchorage areas
risking collisions between the vessels.
Two comments requested that the
requirement for mariners using the
Atlantic Highlands special anchorage
areas to contact the local Harbor Master
be deleted. One of these comments
stated that the Municipal Harbor Master
only has the authority to manage the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:41 Aug 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
172 moorings within the special
anchorage areas and that there is no law
authorizing the Federal government to
require mariners to notify the Harbor
Master. One of these comments
questioned whether the Federal
government had authority to give
navigational control of tidal waters to a
municipal entity or to require mariners
using the anchorage to notify the Harbor
Master. Additionally, one of these
comments stated that the channel
markers installed by Atlantic Highlands
Harbor are at odds with the boundary of
the special anchorage areas, particularly
the southeast corner of the northern
special anchorage area. The lighted
piling is approximately 80 feet
northwest of the southeast corner of the
proposed special anchorage area.
Based upon the comments received
we conducted a site visit with the
Atlantic Highlands Harbor Master on
July 18, 2012. After reviewing the AsBuilt Mooring Field Construction Plan
provided by the Harbor Master, we
determined that eight helical anchors
were installed outside of the proposed
special anchorage areas and 28 of 29
unlit vessels would swing outside of the
special anchorage areas. The presence of
these unlit vessels outside of the special
anchorage areas would create an unsafe
condition for other vessels transiting the
area.
Additionally, floating docks installed
adjacent to the proposed northern
special anchorage area are not depicted
on the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Chart. This
further decreases the area available for
vessels transiting between the proposed
northern special anchorage area and the
docking facilities.
Based upon these findings we are
withdrawing the two proposed special
anchorage areas in Atlantic Highlands,
NJ from this rulemaking. The local
Harbor Master will continue to resolve
mooring location issues as they have
done in previous years prior to
requesting the establishment of these
special anchorage areas. With regard to
the comments regarding contacting the
local Harbor Master, we note that that
section has also been removed from this
final rule, and thus the comments on
that issue are moot.
We received one comment in
opposition to the disestablishment of
the western special anchorage area in
Sheepshead Bay, NY. The comment
stated that the western special
anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay is
useful for transients and visiting vessels
under 65 ft in length because the yacht
clubs and marinas within Sheepshead
Bay have very few moorings capable of
accommodating vessels greater than 40
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ft in length; therefore visiting vessels
with lengths between 40 and 65 feet
must anchor outside of these mooring
fields if they are to stay in Sheepshead
Bay. The commenter also stated that
Sheepshead Bay is located away from
the major shipping channels of New
York Harbor and accommodating
transient boaters in the special
anchorage area tends to keep them from
interfering with the large commercial
vessels. Additionally, the comment
stated that the special anchorage area
provides a relatively convenient access
to public transportation, onshore
shopping and amenities which facilitate
interstate and international commerce.
Based upon this comment we are
withdrawing the proposed
disestablishment of the western special
anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay, NY.
Finally, we are adding the contact
phone number for moorings in
Sheepshead Bay, NY, and clarifying
language regarding the role of the local
Harbor Masters.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect minimal additional cost
impacts on fishing, or recreational boats
anchoring because this rule will not
affect normal surface navigation.
Although this regulation may have some
limited impact on the public due to the
alteration of traffic patterns, the
potential impact will be minimized for
the following reasons: Normal surface
navigation will not be affected as the
special anchorage areas on the Hudson
River have historically been used as
mooring fields by NYC PARKS.
The regulation requiring all vessels
anchoring in Sheepshead Bay, NY to
remain entirely within the northern and
southern special anchorage areas at all
times has the potential to reduce the
number of vessels that are able to
anchor within the special anchorage
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
areas. However, this is necessary to
maintain an open area for larger charter
fishing vessels and event vessels
transiting to and from NYC PARKS
maintained fishing piers to the west.
We expect minimal additional cost
(and the potential for reduced costs due
to the removal of certain regulations)
impacts on the tug and barge operators
because this rule will disestablish USCG
permitting regulations that are currently
under the jurisdiction of the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received zero
comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will
affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The
owners or operators of recreational and
small fishing vessels intending to
anchor in the Hudson River and
Sheepshead Bay, NY.
The rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the same
reasons outlined above in the
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’
section.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:41 Aug 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
51063
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
9. Civil Justice Reform
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of special anchorage areas
and disestablishment of anchorage
ground regulations. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(f) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, To
Minimize Litigation, Eliminate
Ambiguity, and Reduce Burden.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference With Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
51064
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
the following boating clubs: Miramar
Yacht Club (718) 769–3548; Port
Sheepshead (917) 731–8607; or
Sheepshead Yacht Club (718) 891–0991.
(ii) [Reserved].
*
*
*
*
*
■
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
2. Amend § 110.60 by adding
paragraphs (c)(12) and (13) and (d)(8)(i)
and (ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 110.60
Captain of the Port, New York.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(12) 79th Street Boat Basin South. All
waters of the Hudson River enclosed by
a line beginning at the northwest corner
of the 70th Street pier at approximate
position 40°46′47.10″ N, 073°59′29.13″
W; thence to 40°47′02.60″ N,
073°59′17.88″ W; thence to 40°46′59.73″
N, 073°59′13.01″ W; thence along the
shoreline and pier to the point of
beginning.
(13) 79th Street Boat Basin North. All
waters of the Hudson River enclosed by
a line beginning on the shoreline near
West 110th Street at approximate
position 40°48′21.06″ N, 073°58′15.72″
W; thence to 40°48′21.06″ N,
073°58′24.00″ W; thence to 40°47′14.70″
N, 073°59′09.00″ W; thence to
40°47′11.84″ N, 073°59′08.90″ W; thence
along the breakwater and shoreline to
the point of beginning.
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use
of the moorings in anchorage areas
described in paragraphs (c)(12) and (13)
of this section will be under the
supervision of the local Harbor Master
appointed by the City of New York.
Mariners may contact the boat basin on
VHF CH 9 or at (212) 496–2105 for
mooring and anchoring availability. All
moorings or anchors shall be placed
well within the anchorage areas so that
no portion of the hull or rigging will at
any time extend outside of the
anchorage.
(ii) [Reserved.]
(d) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use
of the moorings in anchorage areas
described in paragraphs (d)(6) through
(8) of this section will be under the
supervision of the local Harbor Master
appointed by the City of New York.
Mariners may contact the Harbor Master
at (718) 478–0480. All moorings or
anchors shall be placed well within the
anchorage areas so that no portion of the
hull or rigging will at any time extend
outside of the anchorage. For guest
moorings and access to and from the
anchorage areas described in paragraphs
(d)(6) through (8) mariners may contact
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:41 Aug 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
3. Amend § 110.155 by revising
paragraph (l)(8) to read as follows:
§ 110.155
Port of New York.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(8) Operations near commercial
mooring buoys permitted by the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
(i) No vessel shall continuously
occupy a mooring when a vessel in
regular traffic requires the berth or when
navigation would be menaced or
inconvenienced thereby.
(ii) No vessel shall moor or anchor in
any anchorage in such a manner as to
interfere with the use of a duly
authorized mooring buoy. Nor shall any
vessel moored to a buoy authorized by
the District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers be moored such that any
portion of that vessel comes within 50
feet of a marked or dredged channel.
(iii) No vessel shall be operated
within the limits of an anchorage at
speed exceeding 6 knots when in the
vicinity of a moored vessel.
(iv) In an emergency the Captain of
the Port may shift the position of any
unattended vessel moored in or near
any anchorage.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 2, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–19981 Filed 8–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Table of Acronyms
Coast Guard
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0676]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Motion Picture
Production; Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing five temporary safety zones
on waterways near Chicago, IL. These
safety zones are intended to restrict
vessels from portions of Chicago
waterways due to the filming of a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
motion picture. These temporary safety
zones are necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the stunt work,
low-flying helicopter, and other hazards
involved in the filming of a motion
picture.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
on August 20, 2013, until 9 p.m. on
September 30, 2013. This rule will be
enforced from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. on
intermittent dates from August 20
through September 30, 2013. The Coast
Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners to provide the public with
advanced notice of those days that these
safety zones will be enforced. The Coast
Guard on-scene Captain of the Port
Representative will provide actual
notice on-scene.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0676. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph
McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at 414–747–7148 or
Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51061-51064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19981]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0563]
RIN 1625-AA01
Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New York, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two special anchorage areas,
Special Anchorage Area North and Special Anchorage Area South, along
the Hudson River adjacent to Manhattan at the 79th Street Boat Basin;
revising the New York City Harbor Master phone number for Sheepshead
Bay, NY; and disestablishing the Captain of the Port New York
Commercial Mooring Buoy permit regulations and table displaying the
mooring anchor, chain, and pendant requirements. The Coast Guard is not
establishing two special anchorage areas on Sandy Hook Bay or
disestablishing the western special anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay,
as originally proposed. This action is necessary to facilitate safe
navigation in these areas and provide safe and secure anchorages for
vessels not more than 65 feet in length. This action is intended to
increase the safety of life and property in New York City, improve the
safety of anchored vessels, and provide for the overall safe and
efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce.
DATES: This rule is effective September 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2011-0563]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector New York; telephone (718) 354-4195, email
Jeff.M.Yunker@uscg.mil or Lieutenant Isaac Slavitt, Waterways
Management Division at Coast Guard First District, telephone (617) 223-
8385, email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NYC PARKS New York City Department of Parks and Recreation
A. Regulatory History and Information
On February 6, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Special Anchorage Areas; Port of New York, NY in the
Federal Register (77 FR 5743). We received 13 comments on the proposed
rule. A public hearing was requested, but none was held since the
written comments clearly expressed the views of the commenters and oral
presentations would not aid in the rulemaking process.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236,
2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast Guard to
define anchorage grounds.
The specific reasons for this rulemaking are requests submitted by
the local governments with jurisdiction over the current mooring fields
and special anchorage areas to clarify their usage. Additionally, the
removal of the
[[Page 51062]]
Captain of the Port New York Commercial Mooring Buoy permit regulations
and table Sec. 110.155(L)(7) displaying the mooring anchor, chain, and
pendant requirements aligns these regulations with current U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers permitting regulations.
The purpose of this rule is to facilitate safe navigation in these
areas and provide safe and secure anchorages for vessels not more than
65 feet in length, increase the safety of life and property in New York
City, improve the safety of anchored vessels, and provide for the
overall safe and efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received a total of 13 comments regarding the NPRM.
No comments were received regarding the establishment of the two
special anchorage areas, Special Anchorage Area North and Special
Anchorage Area South along the Hudson River adjacent to Manhattan at
the 79th Street Boat Basin.
The Coast Guard received one comment from the U.S. Department of
the Interior stating they had no comment at that time.
The Coast Guard received one comment that simply restated a portion
of the proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard received ten comments regarding the establishment
of the two special anchorage areas, Atlantic Highland North and
Atlantic Highland South, on Sandy Hook Bay at Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
Of the ten comments relating to the Atlantic Highland areas, four
comments simply expressed support of establishment of the special
anchorage areas.
Four additional comments requested an expansion of the proposed
boundaries of the special anchorage areas beyond the boundary initially
proposed in the NPRM. The comments stated that the special anchorage
areas with designated vessel mooring positions would create hazardous
conditions by transient vessels anchoring outside of the special
anchorage areas. The comments stated that transient vessels would
deploy anchors and chain of various lengths within the special
anchorage areas risking collisions between the vessels.
Two comments requested that the requirement for mariners using the
Atlantic Highlands special anchorage areas to contact the local Harbor
Master be deleted. One of these comments stated that the Municipal
Harbor Master only has the authority to manage the 172 moorings within
the special anchorage areas and that there is no law authorizing the
Federal government to require mariners to notify the Harbor Master. One
of these comments questioned whether the Federal government had
authority to give navigational control of tidal waters to a municipal
entity or to require mariners using the anchorage to notify the Harbor
Master. Additionally, one of these comments stated that the channel
markers installed by Atlantic Highlands Harbor are at odds with the
boundary of the special anchorage areas, particularly the southeast
corner of the northern special anchorage area. The lighted piling is
approximately 80 feet northwest of the southeast corner of the proposed
special anchorage area.
Based upon the comments received we conducted a site visit with the
Atlantic Highlands Harbor Master on July 18, 2012. After reviewing the
As-Built Mooring Field Construction Plan provided by the Harbor Master,
we determined that eight helical anchors were installed outside of the
proposed special anchorage areas and 28 of 29 unlit vessels would swing
outside of the special anchorage areas. The presence of these unlit
vessels outside of the special anchorage areas would create an unsafe
condition for other vessels transiting the area.
Additionally, floating docks installed adjacent to the proposed
northern special anchorage area are not depicted on the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart. This further decreases
the area available for vessels transiting between the proposed northern
special anchorage area and the docking facilities.
Based upon these findings we are withdrawing the two proposed
special anchorage areas in Atlantic Highlands, NJ from this rulemaking.
The local Harbor Master will continue to resolve mooring location
issues as they have done in previous years prior to requesting the
establishment of these special anchorage areas. With regard to the
comments regarding contacting the local Harbor Master, we note that
that section has also been removed from this final rule, and thus the
comments on that issue are moot.
We received one comment in opposition to the disestablishment of
the western special anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay, NY. The comment
stated that the western special anchorage area in Sheepshead Bay is
useful for transients and visiting vessels under 65 ft in length
because the yacht clubs and marinas within Sheepshead Bay have very few
moorings capable of accommodating vessels greater than 40 ft in length;
therefore visiting vessels with lengths between 40 and 65 feet must
anchor outside of these mooring fields if they are to stay in
Sheepshead Bay. The commenter also stated that Sheepshead Bay is
located away from the major shipping channels of New York Harbor and
accommodating transient boaters in the special anchorage area tends to
keep them from interfering with the large commercial vessels.
Additionally, the comment stated that the special anchorage area
provides a relatively convenient access to public transportation,
onshore shopping and amenities which facilitate interstate and
international commerce.
Based upon this comment we are withdrawing the proposed
disestablishment of the western special anchorage area in Sheepshead
Bay, NY.
Finally, we are adding the contact phone number for moorings in
Sheepshead Bay, NY, and clarifying language regarding the role of the
local Harbor Masters.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect minimal additional cost impacts on fishing, or
recreational boats anchoring because this rule will not affect normal
surface navigation. Although this regulation may have some limited
impact on the public due to the alteration of traffic patterns, the
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: Normal
surface navigation will not be affected as the special anchorage areas
on the Hudson River have historically been used as mooring fields by
NYC PARKS.
The regulation requiring all vessels anchoring in Sheepshead Bay,
NY to remain entirely within the northern and southern special
anchorage areas at all times has the potential to reduce the number of
vessels that are able to anchor within the special anchorage
[[Page 51063]]
areas. However, this is necessary to maintain an open area for larger
charter fishing vessels and event vessels transiting to and from NYC
PARKS maintained fishing piers to the west.
We expect minimal additional cost (and the potential for reduced
costs due to the removal of certain regulations) impacts on the tug and
barge operators because this rule will disestablish USCG permitting
regulations that are currently under the jurisdiction of the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received zero comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners
or operators of recreational and small fishing vessels intending to
anchor in the Hudson River and Sheepshead Bay, NY.
The rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the same reasons outlined
above in the ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' section.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, To Minimize Litigation,
Eliminate Ambiguity, and Reduce Burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of special anchorage
areas and disestablishment of anchorage ground regulations. This rule
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(f) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 110 as follows:
[[Page 51064]]
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, 2071;
33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 110.60 by adding paragraphs (c)(12) and (13) and
(d)(8)(i) and (ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.60 Captain of the Port, New York.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(12) 79th Street Boat Basin South. All waters of the Hudson River
enclosed by a line beginning at the northwest corner of the 70th Street
pier at approximate position 40[deg]46'47.10'' N, 073[deg]59'29.13'' W;
thence to 40[deg]47'02.60'' N, 073[deg]59'17.88'' W; thence to
40[deg]46'59.73'' N, 073[deg]59'13.01'' W; thence along the shoreline
and pier to the point of beginning.
(13) 79th Street Boat Basin North. All waters of the Hudson River
enclosed by a line beginning on the shoreline near West 110th Street at
approximate position 40[deg]48'21.06'' N, 073[deg]58'15.72'' W; thence
to 40[deg]48'21.06'' N, 073[deg]58'24.00'' W; thence to
40[deg]47'14.70'' N, 073[deg]59'09.00'' W; thence to 40[deg]47'11.84''
N, 073[deg]59'08.90'' W; thence along the breakwater and shoreline to
the point of beginning.
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use of the moorings in anchorage
areas described in paragraphs (c)(12) and (13) of this section will be
under the supervision of the local Harbor Master appointed by the City
of New York. Mariners may contact the boat basin on VHF CH 9 or at
(212) 496-2105 for mooring and anchoring availability. All moorings or
anchors shall be placed well within the anchorage areas so that no
portion of the hull or rigging will at any time extend outside of the
anchorage.
(ii) [Reserved.]
(d) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) The anchoring of vessels and use of the moorings in anchorage
areas described in paragraphs (d)(6) through (8) of this section will
be under the supervision of the local Harbor Master appointed by the
City of New York. Mariners may contact the Harbor Master at (718) 478-
0480. All moorings or anchors shall be placed well within the anchorage
areas so that no portion of the hull or rigging will at any time extend
outside of the anchorage. For guest moorings and access to and from the
anchorage areas described in paragraphs (d)(6) through (8) mariners may
contact the following boating clubs: Miramar Yacht Club (718) 769-3548;
Port Sheepshead (917) 731-8607; or Sheepshead Yacht Club (718) 891-
0991.
(ii) [Reserved].
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 110.155 by revising paragraph (l)(8) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.155 Port of New York.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(8) Operations near commercial mooring buoys permitted by the
District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
(i) No vessel shall continuously occupy a mooring when a vessel in
regular traffic requires the berth or when navigation would be menaced
or inconvenienced thereby.
(ii) No vessel shall moor or anchor in any anchorage in such a
manner as to interfere with the use of a duly authorized mooring buoy.
Nor shall any vessel moored to a buoy authorized by the District
Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers be moored such that any portion
of that vessel comes within 50 feet of a marked or dredged channel.
(iii) No vessel shall be operated within the limits of an anchorage
at speed exceeding 6 knots when in the vicinity of a moored vessel.
(iv) In an emergency the Captain of the Port may shift the position
of any unattended vessel moored in or near any anchorage.
* * * * *
Dated: May 2, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-19981 Filed 8-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P