Importation of Fresh Oranges and Tangerines From Egypt Into the United States, 50023-50024 [2013-19958]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2013 / Notices
For
questions related to the Asian
Longhorned Beetle Eradication Program,
contact Dr. Robyn Rose, National Asian
Longhorned Beetle Eradication Program
Manager, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 137, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301)
851–2283. For questions related to the
environmental impact statement,
contact Dr. Jim Warren, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Environmental
and Risk Analysis Services, PPD,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 149,
Riverdale, MD 20737; (202) 316–3216.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The Asian longhorned beetle
(Anoplophora glabripennis) (ALB) is a
foreign wood-boring beetle that
threatens a wide variety of hardwood
trees in North America. The native
range of ALB includes China and Korea.
ALB is believed to have been introduced
into the United States from wood pallets
and other wood packing material
accompanying cargo shipments from
Asia. ALB was first discovered in the
United States in August 1996 in the
Greenpoint neighborhood of Brooklyn,
NY. Since then, ALB has been found in
limited areas in New York and New
Jersey, Illinois, Massachusetts, and most
recently, in Clermont County, OH.
Areas where ALB has been found are
quarantined in accordance with the
regulations in 7 CFR 301.51–1 through
301.51–9. These regulations place
restrictions on the movement of ALB
host articles from the quarantined areas,
thus helping to prevent the humanassisted spread of ALB. Within the
quarantined areas, the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
works to eradicate ALB, after which the
quarantine can be removed.
To date, ALB has been eradicated
from Chicago, IL; Hudson, Middlesex,
and Union Counties, NJ; Islip, NY; and
the boroughs of Manhattan and Staten
Island in New York. The infested areas
in Massachusetts and Ohio are active
eradication areas, and APHIS is still
working to determine the extent of those
infestations.
Current efforts to eradicate
infestations in the two locations listed
above include cutting, chipping or
burning, and disposing by mulching of
infested trees and high-risk host trees
(ALB host trees that are located within
a half-mile radius of infested trees).
High-risk host trees that are not cut are
treated with either trunk injections or
soil injections at the base of the tree
using the insecticide imidacloprid.
Under the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Aug 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
seq.), Federal agencies must examine
the potential environmental effects of
proposed Federal actions and
alternatives. We are planning to prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) to analyze the effects of a program
to eradicate the Asian longhorned beetle
from wherever it might occur in the
United States. The EIS will examine the
environmental effects of control
alternatives available to the Agency,
including a no action alternative. It will
be used for planning and
decisionmaking and to inform the
public about the environmental effects
of APHIS’ ALB eradication activities. It
will also provide an overview of APHIS
activities to which we can tier sitespecific analyses and environmental
assessments if new ALB infestations are
discovered in the United States.
We are requesting public comment to
help us identify or confirm potential
alternatives and environmental issues
that should be examined in the EIS, as
well as comments that identify other
issues that should be examined in the
EIS.
The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with: (1) NEPA, (2)
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372).
We have identified five alternatives
for further examination in the EIS:
Take no action. Under the no action
alternative, no eradication efforts would
be undertaken by APHIS. However,
APHIS would continue to implement
quarantine restrictions.
Removal of infested trees. Under this
alternative, APHIS would implement
quarantine restrictions and would only
remove trees infested with ALB. Highrisk host trees would not be removed or
treated.
Full host removal. Under this
alternative, APHIS would implement
quarantine restrictions, remove infested
host trees, and remove high-risk host
trees up to a half mile from infested
trees.
Insecticide treatment. Under this
alternative, APHIS would implement
quarantine restrictions, remove infested
host trees, and treat high-risk host trees
with an insecticide up to a half mile
from infested trees.
Integrated approach. Under this
alternative, APHIS would implement
quarantine restrictions, remove infested
trees, and use a combination of removal
and insecticide treatments of high-risk
host trees.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50023
We have identified the following
potential environmental impacts or
issues for further examination in the
EIS:
• Effects on wildlife, including
consideration of migratory bird species
and changes in native wildlife habitat
and populations.
Æ Effects on federally listed
threatened and endangered species.
• Effects on soil, air, and water
quality.
• Effects on forests and trees in
residential areas.
• Effects on the wood product
industry and other economic impacts,
including impacts on the firewood
industry and on property values.
• Effects on human health and safety.
• Effects on cultural and historic
resources.
We welcome comments on the
proposed action, and on other
alternatives and environmental impacts
or issues that should be considered for
further examination in the EIS.
All comments on this notice will be
carefully considered in developing the
final scope of the EIS. Upon completion
of the draft EIS, a notice announcing its
availability and an invitation to
comment on it will be published in the
Federal Register.
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
August 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–19957 Filed 8–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0053]
Importation of Fresh Oranges and
Tangerines From Egypt Into the United
States
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our decision to allow the importation of
oranges and tangerines from Egypt.
Based on the findings of a pest list and
commodity import evaluation
document, which we made available to
the public for review and comment
through a previous notice, we have
concluded that the application of one or
more designated phytosanitary
measures will be sufficient to mitigate
the pest risk associated with the
importation of oranges and tangerines
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
50024
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2013 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
from Egypt. In addition, based on the
findings of a treatment evaluation
document, we are advising the public
that we are adding a new treatment
schedule in the Plant Protection and
Quarantine Treatment Manual that can
be used to neutralize peach fruit fly
(Bactrocera zonata) and Mediterranean
fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) in oranges
and tangerines.
DATES: Effective Date: August 16, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
´
Tony Roman, Regulatory Policy
Specialist, APHIS, PPQ, 4700 River
Road Unit 156, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851–2242.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ‘‘Subpart—
Fruits and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–
1 through 319.56–59), the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
prohibits or restricts the importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to
prevent the introduction and
dissemination of plant pests.
Section 319.56–4 contains a
performance-based process for
approving the importation of
commodities that, based on the findings
of a pest risk analysis, can be safely
imported subject to one or more of the
designated phytosanitary measures
listed in paragraph (b) of that section.
In accordance with that process, we
published a notice in the Federal
Register on April 18, 2013 (78 FR
23208–23209, Docket No. APHIS–2012–
0053),1 in which we announced the
availability, for review and comment, of
a list of pests associated with oranges
and tangerines from Egypt and a
commodity import evaluation document
(CIED) that evaluates the risks
associated with importation of fruit
from Egypt into the United States.
Because of the time that had passed
since importation of oranges from Egypt
was suspended, APHIS prepared a pest
list to identify pests of quarantine
significance that could follow the
pathway of importation of oranges and
tangerines from Egypt. Based on the pest
list, we then completed a CIED to
identify phytosanitary measures that
could be applied to mitigate the risks of
introducing or disseminating the
identified pests via the importation of
oranges and tangerines from Egypt. We
concluded that fresh oranges and
tangerines can safely be imported into
1 To view the notice, pest list, commodity import
evaluation document, treatment evaluation
document, and the comment we received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
APHIS-2012-0053.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Aug 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
the United States from Egypt using one
or more of the five designated
phytosanitary measures listed in
§ 319.56–4(b). These measures are:
• The oranges and tangerines must be
treated in accordance with 7 CFR part
305 for C. capitata and B. zonata; and
• The oranges and tangerines must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the national plant
protection organization of Egypt stating
that the consignment has begun or has
undergone treatment for C. capitata and
B. zonata in accordance with 7 CFR part
305, with an additional declaration
stating that the fruit in the consignment
was inspected and found free of B.
zonata.
The phytosanitary treatments
regulations contained in part 305 of 7
CFR chapter III set out standards for
treatments required in parts 301, 318,
and 319 of 7 CFR chapter III for fruits,
vegetables, and other articles.
In § 305.2, paragraph (b) states that
approved treatment schedules are set
out in the Plant Protection and
Quarantine (PPQ) Treatment Manual.2
Section 305.3 sets out a process for
adding, revising, or removing treatment
schedules in the PPQ Treatment
Manual. In that section, paragraph (a)
sets out the process for adding, revising,
or removing treatment schedules when
there is no immediate need to make a
change.
The PPQ Treatment Manual does not
currently provide a treatment schedule
for B. zonata in oranges and tangerines.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 305.3(a)(1), the notice we published in
the Federal Register on April 18, 2013,
announced the availability of a new
cold treatment schedule T107–l,
described further in the treatment
evaluation document (TED), that we
determined to be effective against B.
zonata in oranges and tangerines.
In addition to B. zonata, Ceratitis
capitata (Medfly) is the other pest of
concern in oranges originating from
Egypt. The new cold treatment schedule
T107–l is more stringent than the
treatment schedule approved for C.
capitata in oranges and tangerines,
T107–a, and therefore we have
determined that the new cold treatment
schedule is adequate to neutralize C.
capitata as well as B. zonata.
We solicited comments on the notice,
pest list, CIED, and TED for 60 days
ending June 17, 2013. We received one
2 The
Treatment Manual is available on the
Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_
export/plants/manuals/index.shtml or by
contacting the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Manuals
Unit, 92 Thomas Johnson Drive, Suite 200,
Frederick, MD 21702.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
comment by that date from a private
citizen. The commenter agreed that cold
treatment is an effective mitigation
measure for peach fruit fly; however, the
commenter expressed concern that
administering treatment at the port of
entry could be too late in the shipping
process to avoid the spread of peach
fruit flies to other fruits, further stating
that any larvae in the fruit at the time
of exportation could fully develop into
an adult and migrate to other fruits
while en route to the United States. The
commenter recommended that all cold
treatments be conducted prior to
exportation from Egypt to prevent the
spread of fruit flies during shipment.
We understand the commenter’s
concerns; however, the fruit is shipped
in refrigerated containers, which keeps
the larvae from developing further. In
addition, proper containment methods
described in the general cold treatment
requirements in § 305.6 are also
required to prevent fruit flies from
spreading during shipment.
Specifically, paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(6)
of that section require fruit that may be
cold treated to be safeguarded to prevent
cross-contamination or mixing with
other infested fruit. Furthermore, only
the same type of fruit in the same type
of packaging may be treated together in
a container and a numbered seal must
be placed on the doors of the loaded
container which can only be removed at
the port of destination by an official
authorized by APHIS. These safeguards
have been used for many years during
the treatment of a wide variety of
commodities for fruit flies, and we have
found them to be effective.
Therefore, in accordance with § 305.3,
we are announcing the Administrator’s
decision to add the treatment described
in the TED as it is an effective measure
for neutralizing peach fruit fly and
Medfly in oranges and tangerines.
Furthermore, oranges and tangerines
from Egypt may be imported into the
United States subject to the
requirements specified in the CIED.
The new treatment will be listed in
the PPQ Treatment Manual, which is
available at the Web address and
mailing address in footnote 2 of this
document.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
August 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–19958 Filed 8–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50023-50024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19958]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0053]
Importation of Fresh Oranges and Tangerines From Egypt Into the
United States
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public of our decision to allow the
importation of oranges and tangerines from Egypt. Based on the findings
of a pest list and commodity import evaluation document, which we made
available to the public for review and comment through a previous
notice, we have concluded that the application of one or more
designated phytosanitary measures will be sufficient to mitigate the
pest risk associated with the importation of oranges and tangerines
[[Page 50024]]
from Egypt. In addition, based on the findings of a treatment
evaluation document, we are advising the public that we are adding a
new treatment schedule in the Plant Protection and Quarantine Treatment
Manual that can be used to neutralize peach fruit fly (Bactrocera
zonata) and Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) in oranges and
tangerines.
DATES: Effective Date: August 16, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tony Rom[aacute]n, Regulatory
Policy Specialist, APHIS, PPQ, 4700 River Road Unit 156, Riverdale, MD
20737; (301) 851-2242.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR
319.56-1 through 319.56-59), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) prohibits or restricts the importation of fruits and
vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to
prevent the introduction and dissemination of plant pests.
Section 319.56-4 contains a performance-based process for approving
the importation of commodities that, based on the findings of a pest
risk analysis, can be safely imported subject to one or more of the
designated phytosanitary measures listed in paragraph (b) of that
section.
In accordance with that process, we published a notice in the
Federal Register on April 18, 2013 (78 FR 23208-23209, Docket No.
APHIS-2012-0053),\1\ in which we announced the availability, for review
and comment, of a list of pests associated with oranges and tangerines
from Egypt and a commodity import evaluation document (CIED) that
evaluates the risks associated with importation of fruit from Egypt
into the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the notice, pest list, commodity import evaluation
document, treatment evaluation document, and the comment we
received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-
2012-0053.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the time that had passed since importation of oranges
from Egypt was suspended, APHIS prepared a pest list to identify pests
of quarantine significance that could follow the pathway of importation
of oranges and tangerines from Egypt. Based on the pest list, we then
completed a CIED to identify phytosanitary measures that could be
applied to mitigate the risks of introducing or disseminating the
identified pests via the importation of oranges and tangerines from
Egypt. We concluded that fresh oranges and tangerines can safely be
imported into the United States from Egypt using one or more of the
five designated phytosanitary measures listed in Sec. 319.56-4(b).
These measures are:
The oranges and tangerines must be treated in accordance
with 7 CFR part 305 for C. capitata and B. zonata; and
The oranges and tangerines must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by the national plant protection
organization of Egypt stating that the consignment has begun or has
undergone treatment for C. capitata and B. zonata in accordance with 7
CFR part 305, with an additional declaration stating that the fruit in
the consignment was inspected and found free of B. zonata.
The phytosanitary treatments regulations contained in part 305 of 7
CFR chapter III set out standards for treatments required in parts 301,
318, and 319 of 7 CFR chapter III for fruits, vegetables, and other
articles.
In Sec. 305.2, paragraph (b) states that approved treatment
schedules are set out in the Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)
Treatment Manual.\2\ Section 305.3 sets out a process for adding,
revising, or removing treatment schedules in the PPQ Treatment Manual.
In that section, paragraph (a) sets out the process for adding,
revising, or removing treatment schedules when there is no immediate
need to make a change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Treatment Manual is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/index.shtml or by
contacting the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant
Protection and Quarantine, Manuals Unit, 92 Thomas Johnson Drive,
Suite 200, Frederick, MD 21702.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PPQ Treatment Manual does not currently provide a treatment
schedule for B. zonata in oranges and tangerines. Therefore, in
accordance with Sec. 305.3(a)(1), the notice we published in the
Federal Register on April 18, 2013, announced the availability of a new
cold treatment schedule T107-l, described further in the treatment
evaluation document (TED), that we determined to be effective against
B. zonata in oranges and tangerines.
In addition to B. zonata, Ceratitis capitata (Medfly) is the other
pest of concern in oranges originating from Egypt. The new cold
treatment schedule T107-l is more stringent than the treatment schedule
approved for C. capitata in oranges and tangerines, T107-a, and
therefore we have determined that the new cold treatment schedule is
adequate to neutralize C. capitata as well as B. zonata.
We solicited comments on the notice, pest list, CIED, and TED for
60 days ending June 17, 2013. We received one comment by that date from
a private citizen. The commenter agreed that cold treatment is an
effective mitigation measure for peach fruit fly; however, the
commenter expressed concern that administering treatment at the port of
entry could be too late in the shipping process to avoid the spread of
peach fruit flies to other fruits, further stating that any larvae in
the fruit at the time of exportation could fully develop into an adult
and migrate to other fruits while en route to the United States. The
commenter recommended that all cold treatments be conducted prior to
exportation from Egypt to prevent the spread of fruit flies during
shipment.
We understand the commenter's concerns; however, the fruit is
shipped in refrigerated containers, which keeps the larvae from
developing further. In addition, proper containment methods described
in the general cold treatment requirements in Sec. 305.6 are also
required to prevent fruit flies from spreading during shipment.
Specifically, paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(6) of that section require
fruit that may be cold treated to be safeguarded to prevent cross-
contamination or mixing with other infested fruit. Furthermore, only
the same type of fruit in the same type of packaging may be treated
together in a container and a numbered seal must be placed on the doors
of the loaded container which can only be removed at the port of
destination by an official authorized by APHIS. These safeguards have
been used for many years during the treatment of a wide variety of
commodities for fruit flies, and we have found them to be effective.
Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 305.3, we are announcing the
Administrator's decision to add the treatment described in the TED as
it is an effective measure for neutralizing peach fruit fly and Medfly
in oranges and tangerines. Furthermore, oranges and tangerines from
Egypt may be imported into the United States subject to the
requirements specified in the CIED.
The new treatment will be listed in the PPQ Treatment Manual, which
is available at the Web address and mailing address in footnote 2 of
this document.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C.
136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of August 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-19958 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P