Advisory Committees (RRR), 48334-48336 [2013-19087]

Download as PDF 48334 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations I. Background 19 U.S.C. 2511(b)(4) allows the President to designate least developed countries as eligible countries under the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, allowing non-discriminatory treatment of the products of such countries in acquisitions subject to the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement. This statutory authority has been delegated to the United States Trade Representative (USTR). The USTR selects the countries for such designation from the United Nations (UN) Least Developed Countries List. The USTR consults with other Government agencies on trade policy matters through the Trade Policy Review Group and the Trade Policy Staff Committee. These changes are necessary to reflect the UN General Assembly’s current list of least developed countries. Based on changes to the UN Least Developed Countries List and the approval of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, the USTR has revised the list of least developed countries that are designated as eligible countries as follows: • Changed the name of East Timor to Timor-Leste, reflecting the changed name on the UN list. • Removed the Maldives, which is no longer a least developed country. • Added South Sudan, which seceded from Sudan to form an independent state on July 9, 2011, and was formally recognized as a least developed country by the UN in December 2012. Although the United States continues to impose sanctions against Sudan, South Sudan is not subject to sanctions. This final rule revises the definitions of ‘‘designated country’’ in various DFARS clauses (DFARS 252.225–7017, Photovoltaic Devices; DFARS 252.225– 7021, Trade Agreements; and DFARS 252.225–7045, Balance of Payments Program—Construction Material Under Trade Agreements). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES II. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required by Statute ‘‘Publication of proposed regulations,’’ 41 U.S.C. 1707, is the statute that applies to the publication of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Paragraph (a)(1) of the statute requires that a procurement policy, regulation, procedure or form (including an amendment or modification thereof) must be published for public comment if it relates to the expenditure of appropriated funds, and has either a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the agency VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Aug 07, 2013 Jkt 229001 issuing the policy, regulation, procedure or form, or has a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. This final rule is not required to be published for public comment, because it only revises the list of least developed countries that the USTR has designated as eligible for nondiscriminatory treatment under the Trade Agreements Act. Addition of South Sudan and removal of Maldives will have no significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the Government or a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, it was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because this final rule does not constitute a significant DFARS revision within the meaning of FAR 1.501–1 and 41 U.S.C. 1707 does not require publication for public comment. V. Paperwork Reduction Act List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252 Government procurement. Manuel Quinones, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows: Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continue to read as follows: ■ Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. 252.225–7017 [Amended] 2. Amend section 252.225–7017 by— a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(DEC 2012)’’ and adding ‘‘(AUG 2013)’’ in its place; and ■ b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ‘‘Designated country’’ in paragraph (iii), removing the countries of ‘‘East Timor’’ and ‘‘Maldives’’ and adding, in alphabetical order, the countries of ‘‘South Sudan’’ and ‘‘Timor-Leste’’. ■ ■ 252.225–7021 [Amended] 3. Amend section 252.225–7021 by— a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(DEC 2012)’’ and adding ‘‘(AUG 2013)’’ in its place; and ■ b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ‘‘Designated country’’ in paragraph (iii), removing the countries of ‘‘East Timor’’ and ‘‘Maldives’’ and adding, in alphabetical order, the countries of ‘‘South Sudan’’ and ‘‘Timor-Leste’’. ■ ■ 252.225–7045 [Amended] 4. Amend section 252.225–7045 by— a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(NOV 2012)’’ and adding ‘‘(AUG 2013)’’ in its place; and ■ b. In paragraph (a), in the definition of ‘‘Designated country’’ in paragraph (3), removing the countries of ‘‘East Timor’’ and ‘‘Maldives’’ and adding, in alphabetical order, the countries of ‘‘South Sudan’’ and ‘‘Timor-Leste’’. ■ ■ [FR Doc. 2013–18968 Filed 8–7–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). PO 00000 PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 49 CFR Part 95 [Docket No. DOT–OST–2013–0015] RIN 2105–AE22 Advisory Committees (RRR) Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This final rule removes DOT’s advisory committee regulations. The DOT is removing the regulations because they have been made obsolete by other laws, regulations, and agency procedures. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM 08AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DATES: This rule is effective August 8, 2013. Jill Laptosky, Attorney–Advisor, Office of General Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. She may also be reached by telephone at 202–493–0308 or by email at jill.laptosky@dot.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 12, 1968, the Department published a final rule to provide uniform regulations at 49 CFR part 95, relating to the formation and use of advisory committees. See 33 FR 466. Among its major provisions, part 95 set forth regulations governing the use of advisory committees, industry advisory committees, committee meetings, and conflicts of interest. This rule was published pursuant to Executive Order 11007, dated February 26, 1962, which prescribed general rules for the formation and use of advisory committees by departments and agencies of the Government, and authorized Department heads to prescribe additional regulations consistent with the order. Part 95 was amended 4 months after its issuance to allow the Secretary of Transportation, or his or her designee, to waive the requirements relating to the chairmanship of industry committees under certain circumstances.1 Since the issuance of part 95, the universe surrounding advisory committees has changed in several notable ways. Executive Order 11007 has been superseded.2 Congress passed the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA) (Pub. L. 92–463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2). The FACA formalizes a process for the establishment, operation, oversight, and termination of Federal advisory committees. To further transparency in Government, Congress passed the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976.3 The Act applies to Federal advisory committees 4 and specifies situations when Federal agencies can close Federal advisory committee FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES 1 33 FR 6913 (May 8, 1968) (amending 49 CFR 95.11 to provide authority for the Secretary of Transportation or his or her designee to waive the requirements of § 95.11(b) relating to the chairmanship of industry advisory committees whenever compliance with those requirements would interfere with the proper functioning of the committee or would be impracticable, adequate provisions are made to otherwise ensure Government control of the committee’s operation, the waiver would be in the public interest, and the meetings of the committee would be conducted in the presence of a full-time salaried officer or employee of the Government). 2 See Exec. Order No. 11,769 (1974); Exec. Order No. 11,686 (1972); Exec. Order No. 11,671 (1972). 3 5 U.S.C. 552b. 4 5 U.S.C. 552b(a). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Aug 07, 2013 Jkt 229001 meetings to the public.5 Additionally, DOT issued a departmental order that sets forth internal policies and procedures relating to committee management.6 Subsequently, Executive Order 12024 delegated to the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) all of the functions vested in the President by FACA.7 The GSA has issued regulations relating to Federal advisory committees, which were most recently amended in 2001.8 Notwithstanding these changes, our departmental regulations governing advisory committees have substantively remained unchanged since their early amendment in 1968.9 As a result, these regulations are now obsolete, unnecessary, duplicative, or inconsistent with FACA’s progeny. We are removing part 95 because the current body of law (e.g., FACA, GSA regulations, DOT Order 1120.3B) governing the use and management of Federal advisory committees are sufficient. Revising part 95 would only result in unnecessary duplication that would simply reiterate the provisions found in other law. Under the Administrative Procedure Act, an agency may waive the normal notice and comment procedures if the action is a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A). Since part 95 contains obsolete departmental procedures relating to advisory committees, notice and comment is not necessary. For the same reason, the rule can become effective immediately. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). 55 U.S.C. 552b(c). Order 1120.3B (Sept. 23, 1993). 7 Exec. Order No. 12,024 (Dec. 1, 1977). The Reorganization Plan of 1977 transferred advisory committee functions from OMB to GSA. 8 66 FR 37728 (July 19, 2001) (amending GSA’s Federal advisory committee regulations at 41 CFR parts 101–6 and 102–3). 9 Part 95 was updated twice after 1968. See 35 FR 5331 (March 31, 1970) (adding the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) and National Highway Safety Board (NHSB); 36 FR 431 (January 13, 1971) (updating part 95 to reflect the abolishment of NHSB and the establishment of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). However, part 95 has not since been updated to replace UMTA with the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. In addition, part 95 has also not been updated to show that the U.S. Coast Guard is no longer housed in DOT or to add the Maritime Administration, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and Research and Innovative Technology Administration. 6 DOT PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 48335 Regulatory Analyses and Notices Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures The DOT has determined that this action is not a significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and within the meaning of DOT’s regulatory policies and procedures. Since this rulemaking removes obsolete regulations relating to departmental procedure and practice, the DOT anticipates that this rulemaking will have no economic impact. Additionally, this action fulfills the principles of Executive Order 13563, specifically those relating to retrospective analyses of existing rules. This rule is being issued as a result of the reviews of existing regulations that DOT periodically conducts. The DOT is streamlining its regulations by removing a rule that is outmoded and ineffective. Regulatory Flexibility Act Since notice and comment rulemaking is not necessary for this rule, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C. 601–612) do not apply. However, DOT has evaluated the effects of this action on small entities and has determined that the action would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it has no substantive impact on any entities. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This final rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, March 22, 1995) as it will not result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $148.1 million or more in any 1 year (2 U.S.C. 1532). Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment) Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to ensure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that may have a substantial, direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, dated August 4, E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM 08AUR1 48336 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 153 / Thursday, August 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 1999, and the DOT has determined that this action would not have a substantial direct effect or federalism implications on the States and would not preempt any State law or regulation or affect the States’ ability to discharge traditional State governmental functions. Therefore, consultation with the States is not necessary. Paperwork Reduction Act Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget for each collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through regulations. The DOT has analyzed this final rule under the PRA and has determined that this rule does not contain collection of information requirements for the purposes of the PRA. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES National Environmental Policy Act The DOT has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Aug 07, 2013 Jkt 229001 Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and has determined that this action would not have any effect on the quality of the environment. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation) The DOT has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13175 and believes that the action would not have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; would not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments; and would not preempt tribal laws. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement is not required. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects) The DOT has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. The DOT has determined that this is not a significant energy action under that order since it PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 95 Advisory committees. Issued on: July 25, 2013. Anthony R. Foxx, Secretary. For the reasons stated in the preamble and under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 322, the Office of the Secretary amends 49 CFR by removing and reserving part 95. PART 95—[REMOVED AND RESERVED] [FR Doc. 2013–19087 Filed 8–7–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM 08AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 153 (Thursday, August 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48334-48336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19087]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

49 CFR Part 95

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2013-0015]
RIN 2105-AE22


Advisory Committees (RRR)

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation 
(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule removes DOT's advisory committee regulations. 
The DOT is removing the regulations because they have been made 
obsolete by other laws, regulations, and agency procedures.

[[Page 48335]]


DATES: This rule is effective August 8, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Laptosky, Attorney-Advisor, 
Office of General Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 
20590. She may also be reached by telephone at 202-493-0308 or by email 
at jill.laptosky@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 12, 1968, the Department 
published a final rule to provide uniform regulations at 49 CFR part 
95, relating to the formation and use of advisory committees. See 33 FR 
466. Among its major provisions, part 95 set forth regulations 
governing the use of advisory committees, industry advisory committees, 
committee meetings, and conflicts of interest. This rule was published 
pursuant to Executive Order 11007, dated February 26, 1962, which 
prescribed general rules for the formation and use of advisory 
committees by departments and agencies of the Government, and 
authorized Department heads to prescribe additional regulations 
consistent with the order. Part 95 was amended 4 months after its 
issuance to allow the Secretary of Transportation, or his or her 
designee, to waive the requirements relating to the chairmanship of 
industry committees under certain circumstances.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 FR 6913 (May 8, 1968) (amending 49 CFR 95.11 to provide 
authority for the Secretary of Transportation or his or her designee 
to waive the requirements of Sec.  95.11(b) relating to the 
chairmanship of industry advisory committees whenever compliance 
with those requirements would interfere with the proper functioning 
of the committee or would be impracticable, adequate provisions are 
made to otherwise ensure Government control of the committee's 
operation, the waiver would be in the public interest, and the 
meetings of the committee would be conducted in the presence of a 
full-time salaried officer or employee of the Government).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the issuance of part 95, the universe surrounding advisory 
committees has changed in several notable ways. Executive Order 11007 
has been superseded.\2\ Congress passed the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act of 1972 (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2). The FACA 
formalizes a process for the establishment, operation, oversight, and 
termination of Federal advisory committees. To further transparency in 
Government, Congress passed the Government in the Sunshine Act of 
1976.\3\ The Act applies to Federal advisory committees \4\ and 
specifies situations when Federal agencies can close Federal advisory 
committee meetings to the public.\5\ Additionally, DOT issued a 
departmental order that sets forth internal policies and procedures 
relating to committee management.\6\ Subsequently, Executive Order 
12024 delegated to the Administrator of the General Services 
Administration (GSA) all of the functions vested in the President by 
FACA.\7\ The GSA has issued regulations relating to Federal advisory 
committees, which were most recently amended in 2001.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Exec. Order No. 11,769 (1974); Exec. Order No. 11,686 
(1972); Exec. Order No. 11,671 (1972).
    \3\ 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    \4\ 5 U.S.C. 552b(a).
    \5\ 5 U.S.C. 552b(c).
    \6\ DOT Order 1120.3B (Sept. 23, 1993).
    \7\ Exec. Order No. 12,024 (Dec. 1, 1977). The Reorganization 
Plan of 1977 transferred advisory committee functions from OMB to 
GSA.
    \8\ 66 FR 37728 (July 19, 2001) (amending GSA's Federal advisory 
committee regulations at 41 CFR parts 101-6 and 102-3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notwithstanding these changes, our departmental regulations 
governing advisory committees have substantively remained unchanged 
since their early amendment in 1968.\9\ As a result, these regulations 
are now obsolete, unnecessary, duplicative, or inconsistent with FACA's 
progeny. We are removing part 95 because the current body of law (e.g., 
FACA, GSA regulations, DOT Order 1120.3B) governing the use and 
management of Federal advisory committees are sufficient. Revising part 
95 would only result in unnecessary duplication that would simply 
reiterate the provisions found in other law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Part 95 was updated twice after 1968. See 35 FR 5331 (March 
31, 1970) (adding the Urban Mass Transportation Administration 
(UMTA) and National Highway Safety Board (NHSB); 36 FR 431 (January 
13, 1971) (updating part 95 to reflect the abolishment of NHSB and 
the establishment of the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration). However, part 95 has not since been updated to 
replace UMTA with the Federal Transit Administration and Federal 
Motor Carrier Safety Administration. In addition, part 95 has also 
not been updated to show that the U.S. Coast Guard is no longer 
housed in DOT or to add the Maritime Administration, Pipeline and 
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and Research and 
Innovative Technology Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the Administrative Procedure Act, an agency may waive the 
normal notice and comment procedures if the action is a rule of agency 
organization, procedure, or practice. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A). Since 
part 95 contains obsolete departmental procedures relating to advisory 
committees, notice and comment is not necessary. For the same reason, 
the rule can become effective immediately. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).

Regulatory Analyses and Notices

Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order 
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory 
Policies and Procedures

    The DOT has determined that this action is not a significant 
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and 
within the meaning of DOT's regulatory policies and procedures. Since 
this rulemaking removes obsolete regulations relating to departmental 
procedure and practice, the DOT anticipates that this rulemaking will 
have no economic impact.
    Additionally, this action fulfills the principles of Executive 
Order 13563, specifically those relating to retrospective analyses of 
existing rules. This rule is being issued as a result of the reviews of 
existing regulations that DOT periodically conducts. The DOT is 
streamlining its regulations by removing a rule that is outmoded and 
ineffective.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Since notice and comment rulemaking is not necessary for this rule, 
the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5 
U.S.C. 601-612) do not apply. However, DOT has evaluated the effects of 
this action on small entities and has determined that the action would 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities because it has no substantive impact on any entities.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This final rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 
March 22, 1995) as it will not result in the expenditure by State, 
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private 
sector, of $148.1 million or more in any 1 year (2 U.S.C. 1532).

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)

    Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to ensure meaningful and 
timely input by State and local officials in the development of 
regulatory policies that may have a substantial, direct effect on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in 
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive 
Order 13132, dated August 4,

[[Page 48336]]

1999, and the DOT has determined that this action would not have a 
substantial direct effect or federalism implications on the States and 
would not preempt any State law or regulation or affect the States' 
ability to discharge traditional State governmental functions. 
Therefore, consultation with the States is not necessary.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et 
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of 
Management and Budget for each collection of information they conduct, 
sponsor, or require through regulations. The DOT has analyzed this 
final rule under the PRA and has determined that this rule does not 
contain collection of information requirements for the purposes of the 
PRA.

National Environmental Policy Act

    The DOT has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), 
and has determined that this action would not have any effect on the 
quality of the environment.

Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)

    The DOT has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13175 and 
believes that the action would not have substantial direct effects on 
one or more Indian tribes; would not impose substantial direct 
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments; and would not preempt 
tribal laws. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement is not 
required.

Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)

    The DOT has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. The DOT has determined that this is not a 
significant energy action under that order since it is not a 
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not 
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, 
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy 
Effects is not required.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 95

    Advisory committees.

    Issued on: July 25, 2013.
Anthony R. Foxx,
Secretary.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble and under the authority of 
49 U.S.C. 322, the Office of the Secretary amends 49 CFR by removing 
and reserving part 95.

PART 95--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

[FR Doc. 2013-19087 Filed 8-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.