Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit, 48161-48163 [2013-19073]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices
of the public comment and input
submitted focused on expressing
opposition or support for the announced
ELGs for Shale Gas Extraction, Coalbed
Methane Extraction and Dental
Amalgam. A few comments provided a
small amount of information and ideas
on the 304(m) planning process in
general; nanomaterial discharges; the
disposal of unused pharmaceuticals;
and on the ore mining and dressing
study report.
E. Summary of the Process for 2012
Annual Reviews
EPA conducted four new targeted
review methodologies to better identify
new industries or industry processes at
existing industries that may need new
or revised effluent guidelines and
standards for the 2012 reviews. These
methodologies included:
• Identifying pass-through pollutants
in sewage sludge using the 2009
Targeted National Sewage Sludge
Survey (TNSSS).
• Identifying new pollutants and
industry discharges using data and
information from EPA’s toxic substances
control programs.
• Identifying new waste streams
generated from new air pollution
controls associated with Clean Air Act
rulemakings.
• Identifying new industries through
potential TRI expansion sectors.
These new targeted review
methodologies are further described in
the Preliminary 2012 Plan available for
review at: https://water.epa.gov/
lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/304m/
index.cfm.
EPA has modified its annual review
process to conduct a toxicity ranking
analysis for industry only during the
odd numbered years and additional
targeted reviews of industry during the
even numbered years.
F. Request for Comment and
Information
EPA requests comments and
information on the Preliminary 2012
Effluent Guidelines Program Plan and
on the 2011 Annual Effluent Guidelines
Review Report in the following areas.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Data Sources and Methodologies
EPA solicits comments on whether it
used the correct evaluation factors,
criteria, and data sources in conducting
its 2011 annual review and developing
this Plan. EPA also solicits comment on
other data sources EPA can use in its
annual reviews and biennial planning
process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Aug 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
2. Methodologies for the 2012 Annual
Reviews
48161
harness innovation to solve industrial
wastewater problems, both now and
in the future?
—How can EPA better foster
consideration of innovative
technologies through the effluent
guidelines planning process?
EPA solicits comments on its methods
for the 2012 Annual Reviews and for
subsequent even numbered year
reviews. EPA used targeted industrial
review methods during 2012, as
described above. Specifically, EPA
solicits comment on data and other
sources of available information or
approaches that EPA could consider for
the annual reviews in subsequent even
years, or comments regarding the
targeted approaches described above
and in the Preliminary 20122 Plan.
Nancy K. Stoner,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Water.
3. The Preliminary 2012 Effluent
Guidelines Program Plan
[FRL–9844–5]
EPA solicits comments on its
Preliminary 2012 Plan, including the
data and information used to support
the findings and conclusions stated in
the Preliminary 2012 Plan. EPA also
solicits comments on the proposed
decisions to not identify any industry
categories for the development of new
or revised effluent guidelines and to
delist the Coalbed Methane Extraction
subcategory and Chlorine and
Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
Manufacturing from the effluent
guidelines plan.
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air
Act Citizen Suit
4. Implementation Issues Related to
Existing Effluent Guidelines and
Pretreatment Standards
As a factor in its decision-making,
EPA considers opportunities to
eliminate inefficiencies or impediments
to pollution prevention or technological
innovation, or opportunities to promote
innovative approaches such as water
quality trading, including within-plant
trading. Consequently, EPA solicits
comments on implementation issues
related to existing effluent guidelines
and pretreatment standards.
5. Innovation and Technology in the
Effluent Guidelines Program
EPA is requesting public comment
and ideas on the subject of technology
innovation. EPA seeks public input and
comment on the following questions
and related themes:
—Are there new, innovative pollution
control or pollution prevention
technologies that can be used by any
of the existing 57 categories of
industry with effluent limitations
guidelines?
—Are there innovative manufacturing
approaches that can be used by
industries to reduce or prevent their
wastewater discharges?
—How can EPA’s effluent limitations
guidelines program enhance
technology transfer to catalyze and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2013–19074 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent
decree; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(CAA or the Act), notice is hereby given
of a proposed consent decree to address
a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club (Plaintiff)
in the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia: Sierra Club v.
Jackson, No.1:12–cv–01237–ESH
(D.D.C.). On or about July 26, 2012, the
plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that
EPA had failed to take action on certain
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittals by the states of New Jersey
and Michigan. Specifically, the
complaint alleged that EPA had failed to
make a finding that the state of New
Jersey did not submit SIP revisions
addressing the nonattainment New
Source Review requirements for the
1997 fine particulate matter National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (1997
PM2.5 NAAQS) in the State of New
Jersey portion of the PhiladelphiaWilmington nonattainment area. The
complaint further alleged that EPA had
failed to take final action on the
attainment demonstration, contingency
measures, emission inventory and
Reasonably Available Control Measures
or Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACM/RACT),
requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
in both the State of Michigan’s SIP
submittal for the Detroit-Ann Arbor
nonattainment area and the New Jersey
SIP submittal for the State of New Jersey
portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington
nonattainment area. The complaint also
alleged that EPA failed to publish a
notice of determination in the Federal
Register regarding whether the DetroitAnn Arbor area had attained the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
48162
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
attainment date. The proposed consent
decree establishes deadlines for EPA to
take certain actions.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed consent decree must be
received by September 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2013–0553, online at
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method); by email to
oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–
ROM should be formatted in Word or
ASCII file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption,
and may be mailed to the mailing
address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Winifred N. Okoye, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–5446; fax number (202) 564–5603;
email address: okoye.winifred@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Consent Decree
The proposed consent decree would
resolve a lawsuit seeking to compel
action by the Administrator to take final
action under section 110(k)(3) and (4),
42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(3) and (4), to approve
or disapprove, in whole or in part
certain States of New Jersey and
Michigan SIP submittals.
The proposed consent decree requires
EPA, on or before September 30, 2013,
to sign and thereafter promptly forward
to the Office of Federal Register for
review and publication a notice of final
action addressing whether the State of
New Jersey has failed to submit SIP
revisions addressing the nonattainment
New Source Review requirements for
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the State of
New Jersey portion of the PhiladelphiaWilmington nonattainment area. The
proposed consent decree also requires
EPA, on or before November 30, 2013,
to sign and thereafter promptly forward
to the Office of Federal Register for
review and publication a notice taking
final action on the attainment
demonstration, contingency measures,
emission inventory and Reasonably
Available Control Measures or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Aug 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACM/RACT),
requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
in the State of New Jersey SIP submittal
for the State of New Jersey portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington
nonattainment area. EPA is not
required, however, to act on any
submission or portion thereof that is
withdrawn prior to the applicable
deadline. Because the state of Michigan
withdrew its SIP submission for the
attainment demonstration for the
Detroit-Ann Arbor 1997 PM2.5
nonattainment area, on May 20, 2013,
the proposed consent decree does not
require EPA to act on this submission or
any portion thereof.
The proposed consent decree also
states that the consent decree can be
modified by either the parties, or the
court following a motion by a party and
a response thereto. In addition, the
parties agree to informally resolve Sierra
Club’s claim for litigation costs pursuant
to section 304(d), 42 U.S.C. 7604(d), but
that the court would retain jurisdiction
to resolve that claim.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree from persons who were
not named as parties or intervenors to
the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
consent decree if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless
EPA or the Department of Justice
determines, based on any comment
which may be submitted, that consent to
the consent decree should be
withdrawn, the terms of the decree will
be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How can I get a copy of the consent
decree?
Direct your comments to the official
public docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OGC- 2013–
0553, which contains a copy of the
consent decree. The official public
docket is available for public viewing at
the Office of Environmental Information
(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566–
1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the
appropriate docket identification
number.
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web
site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
Dated: July 31, 2013.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–19073 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days
of the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 002206–006.
Title: California Association of Port
Authorities—Northwest Marine
Terminal Association Terminal
Discussion Agreement.
Parties: California Association of Port
Authorities and Northwest Marine
Terminal Association.
Filing Party: Patti A. Fulghum,
Executive Officer; Northwest Marine
Terminal Association; P.O. Box 5684;
Bellevue, WA 98006.
Synopsis: The amendment reflects the
addition of the Port of St. Helens,
Oregon as a member to the Northwest
Marine Terminal Association.
Agreement No.: 009335–007.
Title: Northwest Marine Terminal
Association, Inc. Agreement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Aug 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
Parties: Port of Anacortes; Port of
Astoria; Port of Bellingham; Port of Coos
Bay; Port of Everett; Port of Grays
Harbor; Port of Kalama; Port of
Longview; Port of Olympia; Port of Port
Angeles; Port of Portland; Port of
Seattle; Port of St. Helens; Port of
Tacoma; and Port of Vancouver, USA.
Filing Party: Patti A. Fulghum;
Executive Officer; Northwest Marine
Terminal Association, Inc.; P.O. Box
5684; Bellevue, WA 98006.
Synopsis: The amendment reflects the
addition of the Port of St. Helens,
Oregon as member to the agreement.
Agreement No.: 012184–001.
Title: Crowley/Maersk Line Panama—
U.S. Space Charter Agreement.
Parties: Crowley Latin America
Services, LLC and A.P. Moller-Maersk
A/S.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006–
4007.
Synopsis: The agreement adjusts the
amount of space and the number of
reefer plugs to be provided.
Agreement No.: 201162–010.
Title: NYSA-ILA Assessment
Agreement.
Parties: International Longshoremen’s
Association and New York Shipping
Association.
Filing Parties: Donato Caruso, Esq.;
The Lambos Firm; 303 South Broadway,
Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591 and
Andre Mazzola, Esq.; Marrinan &
Mazzola Mardon, P.C.; 26 Broadway,
17th Floor; New York, NY 10004.
Synopsis: The amendment extends
the agreement and reduces the
assessment for all house containers
within 260 miles, except in the
Bermuda trade effective August 1, 2013.
Dated: August 2, 2013.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–19081 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Notice of a Department of Health and
Human Services Public Meeting and
Request for Comments on Matters
Related to the Protection of Human
Subjects and Research Studying
Standard of Care Interventions;
Amended Notice of Meeting
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Health and Human
Services.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48163
On June 26, 2013, the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) published in the Federal
Register an announcement of a public
meeting to be held on August 28, 2013,
to discuss how certain provisions of the
HHS protection of human subjects
should be applied to research studying
one or more interventions which are
used as standard of care treatment in the
non-research context (78 FR 38343).
In the June 26, 2013 meeting
announcement, HHS stated that
presenters will be scheduled to speak at
the public meeting in the order in which
they register. Notice is hereby provided
that HHS may group presenters
according to the topic of their
presentation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Jerry Menikoff, Director, Office for
Human Research Protections,
Department of Health and Human
Services, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite
200; Rockville, MD 20852, 240–453–
6900; email Jerry.Menikoff@hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
DATED: August 1, 2013.
Howard K. Koh,
Assistant Secretary for Health.
[FR Doc. 2013–19056 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–36–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Board of Scientific Counselors,
National Center for Health Statistics
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), National
Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)
announces the following meeting of the
aforementioned committee:
TIMES AND DATES: 11:00 a.m.—5:30 p.m.,
September 19, 2013; 8:30 a.m.—1:00
p.m., September 20, 2013.
PLACE: NCHS Headquarters, 3311
Toledo Road, Hyattsville, Maryland
20782
STATUS: This meeting is open to the
public; however, visitors must be
processed in accordance with
established federal policies and
procedures. For foreign nationals or
non-US citizens, pre-approval is
required (please contact Gwen Mustaf,
301–458–4500, glm4@cdc.gov or
Virginia Cain, vcain@cdc.gov at least 10
days in advance for requirements). All
visitors are required to present a valid
form of picture identification issued by
a state, federal or international
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48161-48163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9844-5]
Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA or the Act), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent
decree to address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club (Plaintiff) in the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia: Sierra Club
v. Jackson, No.1:12-cv-01237-ESH (D.D.C.). On or about July 26, 2012,
the plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that EPA had failed to take
action on certain State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittals by the
states of New Jersey and Michigan. Specifically, the complaint alleged
that EPA had failed to make a finding that the state of New Jersey did
not submit SIP revisions addressing the nonattainment New Source Review
requirements for the 1997 fine particulate matter National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (1997 PM2.5 NAAQS) in the State of New
Jersey portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington nonattainment area. The
complaint further alleged that EPA had failed to take final action on
the attainment demonstration, contingency measures, emission inventory
and Reasonably Available Control Measures or Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACM/RACT), requirements for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS in both the State of Michigan's SIP submittal
for the Detroit-Ann Arbor nonattainment area and the New Jersey SIP
submittal for the State of New Jersey portion of the Philadelphia-
Wilmington nonattainment area. The complaint also alleged that EPA
failed to publish a notice of determination in the Federal Register
regarding whether the Detroit-Ann Arbor area had attained the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable
[[Page 48162]]
attainment date. The proposed consent decree establishes deadlines for
EPA to take certain actions.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by September 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2013-0553, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method);
by email to oei.docket@epa.gov; mailed to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Winifred N. Okoye, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564-5446; fax number (202) 564-5603; email address:
okoye.winifred@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree
The proposed consent decree would resolve a lawsuit seeking to
compel action by the Administrator to take final action under section
110(k)(3) and (4), 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(3) and (4), to approve or
disapprove, in whole or in part certain States of New Jersey and
Michigan SIP submittals.
The proposed consent decree requires EPA, on or before September
30, 2013, to sign and thereafter promptly forward to the Office of
Federal Register for review and publication a notice of final action
addressing whether the State of New Jersey has failed to submit SIP
revisions addressing the nonattainment New Source Review requirements
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the State of New Jersey portion
of the Philadelphia-Wilmington nonattainment area. The proposed consent
decree also requires EPA, on or before November 30, 2013, to sign and
thereafter promptly forward to the Office of Federal Register for
review and publication a notice taking final action on the attainment
demonstration, contingency measures, emission inventory and Reasonably
Available Control Measures or Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACM/RACT), requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the
State of New Jersey SIP submittal for the State of New Jersey portion
of the Philadelphia-Wilmington nonattainment area. EPA is not required,
however, to act on any submission or portion thereof that is withdrawn
prior to the applicable deadline. Because the state of Michigan
withdrew its SIP submission for the attainment demonstration for the
Detroit-Ann Arbor 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area, on May 20,
2013, the proposed consent decree does not require EPA to act on this
submission or any portion thereof.
The proposed consent decree also states that the consent decree can
be modified by either the parties, or the court following a motion by a
party and a response thereto. In addition, the parties agree to
informally resolve Sierra Club's claim for litigation costs pursuant to
section 304(d), 42 U.S.C. 7604(d), but that the court would retain
jurisdiction to resolve that claim.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed consent decree from persons who were not named as parties
or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines, based on any comment which may be submitted, that
consent to the consent decree should be withdrawn, the terms of the
decree will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree
A. How can I get a copy of the consent decree?
Direct your comments to the official public docket for this action
under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC- 2013-0553, which contains a copy of the
consent decree. The official public docket is available for public
viewing at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-
1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select
``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket identification number.
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic
[[Page 48163]]
public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: July 31, 2013.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-19073 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P