Retrospective Review of Draft Guidance Documents Issued Before 2010; Withdrawal of Guidances, 48175-48177 [2013-19051]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices
accommodated during the scheduled
open public hearing session, FDA may
conduct a lottery to determine the
speakers for the scheduled open public
hearing session. The contact person will
notify interested persons regarding their
request to speak by September 25, 2013.
Persons attending FDA’s advisory
committee meetings are advised that the
Agency is not responsible for providing
access to electrical outlets.
FDA welcomes the attendance of the
public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to
accommodate persons with physical
disabilities or special needs. If you
require special accommodations due to
a disability, please contact Diane
Goyette at least 7 days in advance of the
meeting.
FDA is committed to the orderly
conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/
AboutAdvisoryCommittees/
ucm111462.htm for procedures on
public conduct during advisory
committee meetings.
Notice of this meeting is given under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2).
Dated: August 1, 2013.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special
Medical Programs.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0779]
Retrospective Review of Draft
Guidance Documents Issued Before
2010; Withdrawal of Guidances
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
initiative in the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER)
involving the review of draft guidance
documents issued before 2010 to
determine their status, and to decide
whether those guidances should be
withdrawn, revised, or finalized with
only minor changes. Guidances that are
no longer up to date, and for which
more current information is available,
will be withdrawn. Guidances that
reflect CDER’s current thinking, CDER
will decide whether to revise or finalize.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Aug 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
General comments on Agency
guidance documents are welcome at any
time.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on Agency guidance
documents to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to Agency guidance
documents.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly K. Thomas, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6220,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–2357,
kimberly.k.thomas@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
[FR Doc. 2013–19036 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
This notice describes CDER’s initiative,
announces the first group of guidances
to be withdrawn, describes in general
terms draft guidances under
consideration for revision or
finalization, and explains how CDER is
making this process as transparent as
possible.
In September 2000, FDA issued the
final rule ‘‘Administrative Practices and
Procedures; Good Guidance Practices’’
(GGP) (65 FR 56468; September 19,
2000). The GGP regulation describes
FDA policies and procedures for the
development, issuance, and use of
guidance documents and makes these
Agency policies and procedures clear to
the public. The GGP regulation provides
for developing and issuing guidances
that set forth initial interpretations of
statutory or regulatory requirements,
explain changes in interpretation of
policies that are of other than minor in
nature, or discuss complex scientific
issues or highly controversial issues.
The GGP regulation also requires that
such guidances be issued in draft for
public comment before they are
finalized (Level 1 guidances). In
addition, the GGP regulation explains
that FDA will periodically review
existing guidance documents to
determine whether they need to be
changed or withdrawn.
A key component of the GGP
regulation is ensuring transparency
during guidance development and
issuance. Since finalization of the GGP
regulation in September 2000, CDER has
issued an average of approximately 20
draft guidances each year, seeking
public input and carefully considering
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48175
that input before issuing final versions
of the guidances. In many cases,
guidances were not finalized most often
because of higher staff priorities.
However, over the years, because of new
information, scientific developments,
and emerging technologies, draft
guidances were also revised, and
reissued or withdrawn.1
Recently, CDER launched an initiative
to review draft guidance documents
published before 2010 to decide which
guidances to withdraw, revise, or
finalize with only minor changes. CDER
is withdrawing draft guidances that are
no longer up to date. CDER is also
actively reviewing the draft guidances to
determine which ones to either revise or
finalize. This notice lists the first group
of guidances CDER has identified for
withdrawal, describes generally what
guidances are being reviewed, and
describes how CDER will keep the
public informed of the guidances that
are available with the goal of making the
initiative transparent and consistent
with the GGP regulation (21 CFR
10.115).
II. Withdrawal of Guidances
CDER has reviewed many draft
guidances published before 2010. As a
result of this review, CDER identified 23
draft guidances for withdrawal. The
guidances are being withdrawn because
they are out of date, thus of little use to
the pharmaceutical industry. In most
cases, FDA has developed other
guidances and resources to assist
industry with clinical evaluation and
requirements for drug approval. The
guidances identified for withdrawal
relate to these topics:
• Current good manufacturing
practice (cGMP) compliance specific to
manufacturing, processing, and dose
unit sampling and assessment;
• Development of antimicrobial drugs
for the treatment of acute bronchitis,
bacterial meningitis, bacterial
prostatitis, bacterial vaginosis, catheterrelated bloodstream infections, febrile
neutropenia, gonorrhea, Lyme disease,
streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis,
uncomplicated urinary tract infections,
and vuvlovaginal candidiasis;
• Clinical trials for developing
antimicrobial drugs and packaging of
1 When Level 1 guidances are revised, they are
usually issued as draft, version 2s, for public input
before being issued in final form. When a guidance
needs to be withdrawn, a notice is sometimes
published in the Federal Register announcing that
the guidance has been withdrawn. If no withdrawal
announcement is made, CDER maintains a current
list of new/revised/withdrawn guidances on the
CDER guidance Web page at https://www.fda.gov/
Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm.
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
48176
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
inhalation products in semipermeable
container systems;
• Approval of abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) and 505(b)(2)
applications under the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (i.e., the HatchWaxman Act);
• Procedures relating to submission
of patent information, submission of
marketing applications, and forms for
registration and disclosure of
information;
• Labeling in ANDAs; and
• Qualifying for pediatric exclusivity
under the Best Pharmaceuticals for
Children Act.
CDER is withdrawing the following
guidances:
1. ‘‘Manufacturing, Processing, or
Holding Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients’’—issued April 1998.
2. ‘‘Powder Blends and Finished Dosage
Units—Stratified In-Process Dosage
Unit Sampling and Assessment’’—
issued November 2003.
3. ‘‘Forms for Registration of Producers
of Drugs and Listing of Drugs in
Commercial Distribution’’—issued
May 2001.
4. ‘‘Disclosing Information Provided to
Advisory Committees in Connection
With Open Advisory Committee
Meetings Related to the Testing or
Approval of New Drugs and
Convened by CDER, Beginning on
January 1, 2000’’—issued December
1999.
For information on the four preceding
guidances, contact the Office of
Compliance in CDER.
5. ‘‘Evaluating Clinical Studies of
Antimicrobials in the Division of
Anti-Infective Drug Products’’—
issued February 1997.
6. ‘‘Empiric Therapy of Febrile
Neutropenia—Developing
Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment’’—
issued July 1998.
7. ‘‘Lyme Disease—Developing
Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment’’—
issued July 1998.
8. ‘‘Secondary Bacterial Infections of
Acute Bronchitis—Developing
Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment’’—
issued July 1998.
9. ‘‘Streptococcal Pharyngitis and
Tonsillitis—Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment’’—issued July
1998.
10. ‘‘Uncomplicated Gonorrhea—
Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment’’—issued July 1998.
11. ‘‘Uncomplicated Urinary Tract
Infections—Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment’’—issued July
1998.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Aug 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
12. ‘‘Vulvovaginal Candidiasis—
Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment’’—issued July 1998.
13. ‘‘Bacterial Vaginosis—Developing
Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment’’—
issued July 1998.
14. ‘‘Acute Bacterial Meningitis—
Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment’’—issued July 1998.
15. ‘‘Acute or Chronic Bacterial
Prostatitis—Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment’’—issued July
1998.
16. ‘‘Developing Antimicrobial Drugs—
General Considerations for Clinical
Trials’’—issued July 1998.
17. ‘‘Catheter-Related Bloodstream
Infections—Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment’’—issued October
1999.
For information on the preceding 13
guidances (number 5 through 17),
contact the Office of Antimicrobial
Products in the Office of New Drugs in
CDER.
18. ‘‘Labeling Over-the-Counter (OTC)
Human Drug Products—Updating
Labeling in ANDAs’’—issued
February 2001.
For information on the preceding
guidance (number 18), contact the
Office of Drug Evaluation IV in the
Office of New Drugs in CDER.
19. ‘‘Inhalation Drug Products Packaged
in Semipermeable Container Closure
Systems’’—issued July 2002.
20. ‘‘Listed Drugs, 30-Month Stays, and
ANDAs and 505(b)(2) Applications
Under Hatch-Waxman, as Amended
by the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act
of 2003—Questions and Answers’’—
issued November 2004.
21. ‘‘Referencing Discontinued Labeling
for Listed Drugs in Abbreviated New
Drug Applications’’—issued October
2000.
22. ‘‘Submission of Patent Information
for Certain Old Antibiotics’’—issued
December 2008.
For information on the preceding four
guidances (number 19 through 22),
contact the Office of Pharmaceutical
Science in CDER.
23. ‘‘Qualifying for Pediatric Exclusivity
Under Section 505A of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act’’—
issued September 1999.
For information on the preceding
guidance (number 23), contact the
Pediatric and Maternal Health Staff in
the Office of New Drugs in CDER.
III. Revision or Finalization of
Guidances
In addition to identifying the first set
of guidances for withdrawal, CDER also
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
identified guidances for revision or
finalization. CDER is in the process of
developing a plan for their completion.
Guidances for revision or finalization
are specific to the following topics:
• Biopharmaceutics;
• Chemistry, manufacturing, and
controls;
• Clinical pharmacology;
• Combination products;
• cGMP compliance;
• Development of antimicrobial
drugs;
• Drug advertisements;
• Drug safety;
• Electronic submissions;
• Labeling;
• OTC products;
• Pharmacology and toxicology;
• Procedural guidances; and
• Radiopharmaceuticals.
IV. Maintaining Transparency
CDER would like to make this process
as transparent as possible, consistent
with the GGP regulation. As a result,
CDER is issuing this notice announcing
the initiative for draft guidance review,
and listing the first group of guidances
for withdrawal. CDER also maintains
and regularly updates on its guidance
Web site a list of new, revised, and
withdrawn guidances (at https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm). Each year CDER also
publishes on its guidance Web site a
Guidance Agenda, which lists new draft
and revised draft guidances planned for
issuance in the given calendar year.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding Agency
guidance documents to https://
www.regulations.gov or written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
VI. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain CDER guidance documents
at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm.
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 7, 2013 / Notices
Dated: August 2, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–19051 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0883]
Purdue Pharma L.P.; Withdrawal of
Approval of a New Drug Application for
Oxycontin
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is withdrawing
approval of a new drug application
(NDA) for OXYCONTIN (oxycodone
hydrochloride) Extended-Release
Tablets, held by Purdue Pharma L.P.
(Purdue), One Stamford Forum,
Stamford, CT 06901–3431. Purdue has
voluntarily requested that approval of
this application (NDA 20–553) be
withdrawn and has waived its
opportunity for a hearing.
DATES: Effective August 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Raulerson, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6368,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–3522.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA
approved NDA 20–553 for OXYCONTIN
(oxycodone hydrochloride) ExtendedRelease Tablets, 10 milligrams (mg), 15
mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg,
and 160 mg, (original OxyContin), on
December 12, 1995. A reformulated
version of these products, OXYCONTIN
(oxycodone hydrochloride) ExtendedRelease Tablets, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg,
30 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg
(reformulated OxyContin), is the subject
of NDA 22–272, also held by Purdue
and initially approved on April 5, 2010.
Reformulated OxyContin was developed
with physicochemical properties that
are intended to make the tablet more
difficult to manipulate for purposes of
abuse or misuse. Both original and
reformulated OxyContin are opioid
agonist products. Original OxyContin
was indicated for the management of
moderate to severe pain when a
continuous, around-the-clock opioid
analgesic is needed for an extended
period of time.
In correspondence dated August 10,
2010, Purdue notified FDA that it had
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Aug 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
ceased shipment of original OxyContin,
and FDA subsequently moved original
OxyContin to the ‘‘Discontinued Drug
Product List’’ section of the Orange
Book. In a letter to FDA dated March 19,
2013, Purdue requested that FDA
withdraw approval of NDA 20–553 for
original OxyContin, noting that the
original formulation of OxyContin was
subject to abuse and misuse, and that it
was ‘‘not possible to develop labeling or
REMS provisions that would create a
positive risk/benefit ratio for the
original formulation of OxyContin.’’ In
that letter, Purdue waived its right to a
hearing.
On April 18, 2013, FDA published
notice of its determination that original
OxyContin, NDA 20–553, was
withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness (78 FR 23273).
The notice concluded that ‘‘[o]riginal
OxyContin . . . poses an increased
potential for abuse by certain routes of
administration, when compared to
reformulated OxyContin. Based on the
totality of the data and information
available to the Agency at this time,
FDA concludes that the benefits of
original OxyContin no longer outweigh
its risks.’’
Under section 505(e) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(e)), and under
authority delegated by the
Commissioner to the Director, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, approval
of NDA 20–553, and all amendments
and supplements thereto, is withdrawn
(see DATES). Distribution of this product
in interstate commerce without an
approved application is illegal and
subject to regulatory action (see sections
505(a) and 301(d) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355(a) and 331(d)).
Dated: July 30, 2013.
Janet Woodcock,
Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research.
[FR Doc. 2013–18694 Filed 8–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review; 30-day
Comment Request: National Institute
of Mental Health Data Access Request
and Use Certification
Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National
Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the
National Institutes of Health, has
submitted to the Office of Management
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48177
and Budget (OMB) a request for review
and approval of the information
collection listed below. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register on
May 28, 2013, Volume 78, Number 102,
Pages 31947–31948 and allowed 60days for public comment. No comments
were received. The purpose of this
notice is to allow an additional 30 days
for public comment. The National
Institute of Mental Health (NIMH),
National Institutes of Health, may not
conduct or sponsor, and the respondent
is not required to respond to, an
information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or
after October 1, 1995, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the item(s) contained in this notice,
especially regarding the estimated
public burden and associated response
time, should be directed to the: Office
of Management and Budget, Office of
Regulatory Affairs,
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–6974, Attention: NIH
Desk Officer.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
obtain a copy of the data collection
plans and instruments, or request more
information on the proposed project,
contact: Keisha Shropshire, NIMH
Project Clearance Liaison, Science
Policy and Evaluation Branch, OSPPC,
NIMH, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001
Executive Boulevard, MSC 9667,
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, or
call 301–443–4335 or email your
request, including your address to:
kshropsh@mail.nih.gov. Formal requests
for additional plans and instruments
must be requested in writing.
Proposed Collection: The National
Institute of Mental Health Data Access
Request and Use Certification
(previously National Database for
Autism Research Data Access Request),
0925–0667, Revision, Expiration Date:
01/31/2016; National Institute of Mental
Health (NIMH), National Institutes of
Health (NIH).
Need and Use of Information
Collection: NIMH recently received
OMB approval for use of the National
Database for Autism Research (NDAR)
Data Use Certification (DUC) Form.
NIMH is interested in renaming this
form the ‘‘NIMH Data Access Request
and Use Certification (DUC) Form’’ and
using it to meet the unique data access
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48175-48177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19051]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0779]
Retrospective Review of Draft Guidance Documents Issued Before
2010; Withdrawal of Guidances
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
initiative in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
involving the review of draft guidance documents issued before 2010 to
determine their status, and to decide whether those guidances should be
withdrawn, revised, or finalized with only minor changes. Guidances
that are no longer up to date, and for which more current information
is available, will be withdrawn. Guidances that reflect CDER's current
thinking, CDER will decide whether to revise or finalize. This notice
describes CDER's initiative, announces the first group of guidances to
be withdrawn, describes in general terms draft guidances under
consideration for revision or finalization, and explains how CDER is
making this process as transparent as possible.
DATES: General comments on Agency guidance documents are welcome at any
time.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on Agency guidance documents to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to Agency guidance documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly K. Thomas, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6220, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2357, kimberly.k.thomas@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In September 2000, FDA issued the final rule ``Administrative
Practices and Procedures; Good Guidance Practices'' (GGP) (65 FR 56468;
September 19, 2000). The GGP regulation describes FDA policies and
procedures for the development, issuance, and use of guidance documents
and makes these Agency policies and procedures clear to the public. The
GGP regulation provides for developing and issuing guidances that set
forth initial interpretations of statutory or regulatory requirements,
explain changes in interpretation of policies that are of other than
minor in nature, or discuss complex scientific issues or highly
controversial issues. The GGP regulation also requires that such
guidances be issued in draft for public comment before they are
finalized (Level 1 guidances). In addition, the GGP regulation explains
that FDA will periodically review existing guidance documents to
determine whether they need to be changed or withdrawn.
A key component of the GGP regulation is ensuring transparency
during guidance development and issuance. Since finalization of the GGP
regulation in September 2000, CDER has issued an average of
approximately 20 draft guidances each year, seeking public input and
carefully considering that input before issuing final versions of the
guidances. In many cases, guidances were not finalized most often
because of higher staff priorities. However, over the years, because of
new information, scientific developments, and emerging technologies,
draft guidances were also revised, and reissued or withdrawn.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ When Level 1 guidances are revised, they are usually issued
as draft, version 2s, for public input before being issued in final
form. When a guidance needs to be withdrawn, a notice is sometimes
published in the Federal Register announcing that the guidance has
been withdrawn. If no withdrawal announcement is made, CDER
maintains a current list of new/revised/withdrawn guidances on the
CDER guidance Web page at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently, CDER launched an initiative to review draft guidance
documents published before 2010 to decide which guidances to withdraw,
revise, or finalize with only minor changes. CDER is withdrawing draft
guidances that are no longer up to date. CDER is also actively
reviewing the draft guidances to determine which ones to either revise
or finalize. This notice lists the first group of guidances CDER has
identified for withdrawal, describes generally what guidances are being
reviewed, and describes how CDER will keep the public informed of the
guidances that are available with the goal of making the initiative
transparent and consistent with the GGP regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
II. Withdrawal of Guidances
CDER has reviewed many draft guidances published before 2010. As a
result of this review, CDER identified 23 draft guidances for
withdrawal. The guidances are being withdrawn because they are out of
date, thus of little use to the pharmaceutical industry. In most cases,
FDA has developed other guidances and resources to assist industry with
clinical evaluation and requirements for drug approval. The guidances
identified for withdrawal relate to these topics:
Current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) compliance
specific to manufacturing, processing, and dose unit sampling and
assessment;
Development of antimicrobial drugs for the treatment of
acute bronchitis, bacterial meningitis, bacterial prostatitis,
bacterial vaginosis, catheter-related bloodstream infections, febrile
neutropenia, gonorrhea, Lyme disease, streptococcal pharyngitis and
tonsillitis, uncomplicated urinary tract infections, and vuvlovaginal
candidiasis;
Clinical trials for developing antimicrobial drugs and
packaging of
[[Page 48176]]
inhalation products in semipermeable container systems;
Approval of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) and
505(b)(2) applications under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (i.e., the Hatch-Waxman Act);
Procedures relating to submission of patent information,
submission of marketing applications, and forms for registration and
disclosure of information;
Labeling in ANDAs; and
Qualifying for pediatric exclusivity under the Best
Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.
CDER is withdrawing the following guidances:
1. ``Manufacturing, Processing, or Holding Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients''--issued April 1998.
2. ``Powder Blends and Finished Dosage Units--Stratified In-Process
Dosage Unit Sampling and Assessment''--issued November 2003.
3. ``Forms for Registration of Producers of Drugs and Listing of Drugs
in Commercial Distribution''--issued May 2001.
4. ``Disclosing Information Provided to Advisory Committees in
Connection With Open Advisory Committee Meetings Related to the Testing
or Approval of New Drugs and Convened by CDER, Beginning on January 1,
2000''--issued December 1999.
For information on the four preceding guidances, contact the Office
of Compliance in CDER.
5. ``Evaluating Clinical Studies of Antimicrobials in the Division of
Anti-Infective Drug Products''--issued February 1997.
6. ``Empiric Therapy of Febrile Neutropenia--Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment''--issued July 1998.
7. ``Lyme Disease--Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment''--
issued July 1998.
8. ``Secondary Bacterial Infections of Acute Bronchitis--Developing
Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment''--issued July 1998.
9. ``Streptococcal Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis--Developing
Antimicrobial Drugs for Treatment''--issued July 1998.
10. ``Uncomplicated Gonorrhea--Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment''--issued July 1998.
11. ``Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections--Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment''--issued July 1998.
12. ``Vulvovaginal Candidiasis--Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment''--issued July 1998.
13. ``Bacterial Vaginosis--Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment''--issued July 1998.
14. ``Acute Bacterial Meningitis--Developing Antimicrobial Drugs for
Treatment''--issued July 1998.
15. ``Acute or Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis--Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment''--issued July 1998.
16. ``Developing Antimicrobial Drugs--General Considerations for
Clinical Trials''--issued July 1998.
17. ``Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections--Developing Antimicrobial
Drugs for Treatment''--issued October 1999.
For information on the preceding 13 guidances (number 5 through
17), contact the Office of Antimicrobial Products in the Office of New
Drugs in CDER.
18. ``Labeling Over-the-Counter (OTC) Human Drug Products--Updating
Labeling in ANDAs''--issued February 2001.
For information on the preceding guidance (number 18), contact the
Office of Drug Evaluation IV in the Office of New Drugs in CDER.
19. ``Inhalation Drug Products Packaged in Semipermeable Container
Closure Systems''--issued July 2002.
20. ``Listed Drugs, 30-Month Stays, and ANDAs and 505(b)(2)
Applications Under Hatch-Waxman, as Amended by the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003--
Questions and Answers''--issued November 2004.
21. ``Referencing Discontinued Labeling for Listed Drugs in Abbreviated
New Drug Applications''--issued October 2000.
22. ``Submission of Patent Information for Certain Old Antibiotics''--
issued December 2008.
For information on the preceding four guidances (number 19 through
22), contact the Office of Pharmaceutical Science in CDER.
23. ``Qualifying for Pediatric Exclusivity Under Section 505A of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act''--issued September 1999.
For information on the preceding guidance (number 23), contact the
Pediatric and Maternal Health Staff in the Office of New Drugs in CDER.
III. Revision or Finalization of Guidances
In addition to identifying the first set of guidances for
withdrawal, CDER also identified guidances for revision or
finalization. CDER is in the process of developing a plan for their
completion. Guidances for revision or finalization are specific to the
following topics:
Biopharmaceutics;
Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls;
Clinical pharmacology;
Combination products;
cGMP compliance;
Development of antimicrobial drugs;
Drug advertisements;
Drug safety;
Electronic submissions;
Labeling;
OTC products;
Pharmacology and toxicology;
Procedural guidances; and
Radiopharmaceuticals.
IV. Maintaining Transparency
CDER would like to make this process as transparent as possible,
consistent with the GGP regulation. As a result, CDER is issuing this
notice announcing the initiative for draft guidance review, and listing
the first group of guidances for withdrawal. CDER also maintains and
regularly updates on its guidance Web site a list of new, revised, and
withdrawn guidances (at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm). Each
year CDER also publishes on its guidance Web site a Guidance Agenda,
which lists new draft and revised draft guidances planned for issuance
in the given calendar year.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
Agency guidance documents to https://www.regulations.gov or written
comments to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is
only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to
the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
VI. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain CDER guidance
documents at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
[[Page 48177]]
Dated: August 2, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-19051 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P