Disapproval of State Implementation Plan; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard; Montana, 47572-47573 [2013-18842]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
47572
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
within the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port Zone enclosed by
three lines and the shoreline: Line one
starting on the shoreline at 45–31′49″ N/
122–40′15″ W then heading 70 yards
offshore to 45–31′48″ N/122–40′17″ W
then heading up river 300 yards to 45–
31′41″ N/122–40′09″ W then heading
100 yards to the shoreline ending at 45–
31′43″ N/122–40′06″ W.
(c) Effective Period. The safety zones
created in this section will be in effect
from July 24, 2013 and will be enforced
until 90 days from date of publication
in the Federal Register. They will be
activated for enforcement as described
in paragraph (d) of this section.
(d) Enforcement Periods. The Sector
Columbia River Captain of the Port will
cause notice of the enforcement of the
grain facilities safety zones to be made
by all appropriate means to effect the
widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public as practicable, in
accordance with 33 CFR 165.7. Such
means of notification may include, but
are not limited to, Broadcast Notices to
Mariners or Local Notices to Mariners.
The Sector Columbia River Captain of
the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners notifying the public when
enforcement of the safety zone is
suspended. Upon notice of enforcement
by the Sector Columbia River Captain of
the Port, the Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zone in accordance with rules
set out in this section. Upon notice of
suspension of enforcement by the Sector
Columbia River Captain of the Port, all
persons and vessels are authorized to
enter, transit, and exit the safety zone,
consistent with the Navigation Rules.
(e) Regulation. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within
these zones is prohibited unless
authorized by the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port, the official patrol,
or other designated representatives of
the Captain of the Port.
(2) To request authorization to enter
or operate within the safety zone contact
the on-scene official patrol on VHF-FM
channel 16 or 13, or the Sector
Columbia River Command Center at
phone number (503) 861–6211.
Authorization will be granted based on
the necessity of access and consistent
with safe navigation.
(3) Vessels authorized to enter or
operate within the safety zone shall
operate at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course and
shall proceed as directed by the onscene official patrol. The Navigation
Rules shall apply at all times within the
safety zone.
(4) Maneuver-restricted vessels. When
conditions permit, the on-scene official
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Aug 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
patrol, or a designated representative of
the Captain of the Port at the Sector
Columbia River Command Center,
should:
(i) Permit vessels constrained by their
navigational draft or restricted in their
ability to maneuver to enter or operate
within the safety zone in order to ensure
a safe passage in accordance with the
Navigation Rules; and
(ii) Permit commercial vessels
anchored in a designated anchorage area
to remain at anchor within the safety
zone; and
(iii) Permit vessels that must transit
via a navigable channel or waterway to
enter or operate within the safety zone
in order to do so.
(f) Exemption. Public vessels as
defined in paragraph (a) of this section
are exempt from complying with
paragraph (e) of this section.
(g) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
may enforce the rules in this section. In
the navigable waters of the United
States to which this section applies,
when immediate action is required and
representatives of the Coast Guard are
not present or are not present in
sufficient force to provide effective
enforcement of this section, any Federal
Law Enforcement Officer, Oregon Law
Enforcement Officer, or Washington
Law Enforcement Officer may enforce
the rules contained in this section
pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 70118. In
addition, the Captain of the Port may be
assisted by other federal, state, or local
agencies in enforcing this section.
(h) Waiver. The Captain of the Port
Columbia River may waive any of the
requirements of this section for any
vessel or class of vessels upon finding
that operational conditions or other
circumstances are such that application
of this section is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of port
safety or environmental safety.
Dated: July 24, 2013.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2013–18983 Filed 8–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2010–0298, FRL–9843–2]
Disapproval of State Implementation
Plan; Infrastructure Requirements for
the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard; Montana
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is disapproving the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Montana to demonstrate that
the SIP meets one of the infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for
ozone on July 18, 1997. The CAA
requires that each state, after a new or
revised NAAQS is promulgated, review
their SIPs to ensure that they meet
infrastructure requirements. The State of
Montana submitted certifications of
their infrastructure SIP for the 1997
ozone NAAQS on November 28, 2007
and December 22, 2009. EPA is
disapproving Montana’s submissions
with respect to the infrastructure
element regarding state boards.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective September 5, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2010–0298. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials NAAQS mean or refer
to National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
(iv) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(v) The words State or Montana mean
the State of Montana, unless the context
indicates otherwise.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs
are provided in sections 110(a)(1) and
(2) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists
the specific infrastructure elements that
a SIP must contain or satisfy. The
element that is the subject of this action,
section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii), is described in
detail in our proposal of May 31, 2013
(78 FR 32613). The State of Montana
submitted certifications of their
infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS on November 28, 2007 and
December 22, 2009. We acted on those
submissions, with the exception of
element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii), on July 22, 2011
(76 FR 43918).
On May 31, 2013, EPA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for
the remaining portion of the two
Montana submissions. The NPR
proposed disapproval of the Montana
submissions with respect to
infrastructure element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii)
regarding requirements for state boards
under section 128. The reasons for this
disapproval are detailed within our
proposal. In summary, the Montana SIP
fails to include provisions which meet
the explicit legal requirements of
section 128.
II. Response to Comments
No comments were received.
III. Final Action
EPA is disapproving Montana’s
November 28, 2007 and December 22,
2009 submissions for the 1997 ozone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Aug 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
NAAQS with respect to infrastructure
element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) regarding
requirements for state boards under
CAA section 128.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to act on SIP
submissions in accordance with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to either
approve or disapprove state choices, in
accordance with the criteria of the Clean
Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely
disapproves a state submission that does
not meet Federal requirements. This
action does not raise novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set for in the EO and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
these reasons, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
47573
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 7, 2013.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: July 24, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013–18842 Filed 8–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47572-47573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18842]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2010-0298, FRL-9843-2]
Disapproval of State Implementation Plan; Infrastructure
Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard; Montana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is disapproving the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Montana to demonstrate that the SIP meets one
of the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for ozone on
July 18, 1997. The CAA requires that each state, after a new or revised
NAAQS is promulgated, review their SIPs to ensure that they meet
infrastructure requirements. The State of Montana submitted
certifications of their infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone NAAQS on
November 28, 2007 and December 22, 2009. EPA is disapproving Montana's
submissions with respect to the infrastructure element regarding state
boards.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective September 5, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2010-0298. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR,
[[Page 47573]]
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to National Ambient Air
Quality Standards.
(iv) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(v) The words State or Montana mean the State of Montana, unless
the context indicates otherwise.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs are provided in sections
110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists the specific
infrastructure elements that a SIP must contain or satisfy. The element
that is the subject of this action, section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii), is
described in detail in our proposal of May 31, 2013 (78 FR 32613). The
State of Montana submitted certifications of their infrastructure SIP
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS on November 28, 2007 and December 22, 2009. We
acted on those submissions, with the exception of element
110(a)(2)(E)(ii), on July 22, 2011 (76 FR 43918).
On May 31, 2013, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPR) for the remaining portion of the two Montana submissions. The NPR
proposed disapproval of the Montana submissions with respect to
infrastructure element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) regarding requirements for
state boards under section 128. The reasons for this disapproval are
detailed within our proposal. In summary, the Montana SIP fails to
include provisions which meet the explicit legal requirements of
section 128.
II. Response to Comments
No comments were received.
III. Final Action
EPA is disapproving Montana's November 28, 2007 and December 22,
2009 submissions for the 1997 ozone NAAQS with respect to
infrastructure element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) regarding requirements for
state boards under CAA section 128.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to act on
SIP submissions in accordance with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to either approve or
disapprove state choices, in accordance with the criteria of the Clean
Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely disapproves a state submission
that does not meet Federal requirements. This action does not raise
novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set for in the EO and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For these reasons, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 7, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 24, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013-18842 Filed 8-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P