Mixed Straddles; Straddle-by-Straddle Identification Under Section 1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(I), 46807-46809 [2013-18702]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
extent of the $8 gain recognized by Y by
reason of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, or
to the extent of the $22 gain realized but not
recognized by Y by reason of paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of this section.
Example 4. Section 1033(a) involuntary
conversion of property held by a C
corporation transferor. (i) Facts. Y owned
uninsured, improved property (Property 1)
that was involuntarily converted (within the
meaning of section 1033(a)) in a fire. Y sold
Property 1 for $100 to X, which owned an
adjacent property and wanted Property 1 for
use as a parking lot. Y had a $70 basis in
Property 1 immediately before the sale. Y
elected to defer gain recognition under
section 1033(a)(2), and purchased qualifying
replacement property (Property 2) for $100
from an unrelated party prior to the
expiration of the period described in section
1033(a)(2)(B).
(ii) Analysis. The transfer of Property 1 by
Y to X is a conversion transaction within the
meaning of paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
The conversion transaction (combined with
Y’s purchase of Property 2) is a
nonrecognition transaction under section
1033(a) as to Y; thus, Y does not recognize
any of its $30 gain. Therefore, the conversion
transaction is not subject to paragraph (a)(1)
of this section by reason of paragraph (d)(3)(i)
of this section.
Example 5. Section 1033(a) involuntary
conversion of property held by a REIT. (i)
Facts. X owned property (Property 1). On
January 1, Year 2, Property 1 had a fair
market value of $100 and a basis of $70, and
X was not subject to section 1374 treatment
with respect to Property 1. On that date,
when Property 1 was under a threat of
condemnation, X sold Property 1 to an
unrelated party for $100 (First Transaction).
X elected to defer gain recognition under
section 1033(a)(2), and purchased qualifying
replacement property (Property 2) for $100
from Y (Second Transaction) prior to the
expiration of the period described in section
1033(a)(2)(B).
(ii) Analysis. The transfer of Property 2 by
Y to X in the Second Transaction is a
conversion transaction within the meaning of
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section. The
Second Transaction (combined with the First
Transaction) is a nonrecognition transaction
under section 1033(a) as to X, but not as to
Y. Assume no nonrecognition provision
applied to Y; thus, Y recognized gain or loss
on its sale of Property 2 in the Second
Transaction, and the Second Transaction is
not subject to paragraph (a)(1) of this section
by reason of paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(4) Special rule if C corporation is a
tax-exempt entity. Paragraph (a)(1) of
this section does not apply to a
conversion transaction in which the C
corporation that owned the converted
property is a tax-exempt entity
described in § 1.337(d)–4(c)(2) to the
extent that gain (if any) would not be
subject to tax under Title 26 of the
United States Code if a deemed sale
election under paragraph (c)(5) of this
section were made.
(e) Special rule for partnerships—(1)
In general. The principles of this section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Aug 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
46807
apply to property transferred by a
partnership to a RIC or REIT to the
extent of any gain or loss in the
converted property that would be
allocated directly or indirectly, through
one or more partnerships, to a C
corporation if the partnership sold the
converted property to an unrelated party
at fair market value on the deemed sale
date (as defined in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section). If the partnership were to
elect deemed sale treatment under
paragraph (c) of this section in lieu of
section 1374 treatment under paragraph
(b) of this section with respect to such
transfer, then any net gain recognized by
the partnership on the deemed sale
must be allocated to the C corporation
partner, but does not increase the
capital account of any partner. Any
adjustment to the partnership’s basis in
the RIC or REIT stock as a result of
deemed sale treatment under paragraph
(c) of this section shall constitute an
adjustment to the basis of that stock
with respect to the C corporation
partner only. The principles of section
743 apply to such basis adjustment.
date. If PRS were to sell Property 1 to an
unrelated party at fair market value on the
deemed sale date, PRS would allocate $80 of
built-in gain to Y. Thus, X is subject to
section 1374 treatment on Property 1 with
respect to $80 of built-in gain.
(2) Example; Transfer by partnership of
property to REIT. (i) Facts. PRS, a partnership
for Federal income tax purposes, has three
partners: TE, a C corporation (within the
meaning of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section)
that is also a tax-exempt entity (within the
meaning of § 1.337(d)-4(c)(2)), owns 50
percent of the capital and profits of PRS; A,
an individual, owns 30 percent of the capital
and profits of PRS; and Y, a C corporation
(within the meaning of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of
this section), owns the remaining 20 percent.
PRS owns a building that it leases for
commercial use (Property 1). On January 1,
Year 2, when PRS has an adjusted basis in
Property 1 of $100 and Property 1 has a fair
market value of $500, PRS transfers Property
1 to X, a REIT, in exchange for stock of X in
an exchange described in section 351. PRS
does not elect deemed sale treatment under
paragraph (c) of this section. TE would not
be subject to tax with respect to any gain that
would be allocated to it if PRS had sold
Property 1 to an unrelated party at fair
market value.
(ii) Analysis. The transfer of Property 1 by
PRS to X is a conversion transaction within
the meaning of paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this
section to the extent of any gain or loss that
would be allocated to any C corporation
partner if PRS sold Property 1 at fair market
value to an unrelated party on the deemed
sale date. TE and Y are C corporations, but
A is not a C corporation within the meaning
of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
Therefore, the transfer of Property 1 by PRS
to X is a conversion transaction within the
meaning of paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section
to the extent of the gain in Property 1 that
would be allocated to TE and Y. Pursuant to
paragraph (d)(4) of this section, paragraph
(a)(1) of this section does not apply to the
extent of the gain that would be allocated to
TE if PRS had sold Property 1 to an unrelated
party at fair market value on the deemed sale
Beth Tucker,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: June 25, 2013.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(f) Effective/Applicability date—(1) In
general. Except as provided in
paragraph (f)(2) of this section, this
section applies to conversion
transactions that occur on or after
January 2, 2002. For conversion
transactions that occurred on or after
June 10, 1987, and before January 2,
2002, see §§ 1.337(d)–5 and 1.337(d)–6.
(2) Special rule. Paragraphs (a)(2),
(d)(1), (d)(3), (d)(4), and (e) of this
section apply to conversion transactions
that occur on or after August 2, 2013.
However, taxpayers may apply
paragraphs (a)(2), (d)(1), (d)(3), (d)(4),
and (e) of this section to conversion
transactions that occurred before August
2, 2013. For conversion transactions that
occurred on or after January 2, 2002 and
before August 2, 2013, see § 1.337(d)–7
as contained in 26 CFR part 1 in effect
on April 1, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013–18695 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9627]
RIN 1545–BL04
Mixed Straddles; Straddle-by-Straddle
Identification Under Section
1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(I)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Temporary regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains
guidance for those taxpayers electing to
establish a mixed straddle using
straddle-by-straddle identification.
These temporary regulations explain
how to account for unrealized gain or
loss on a position held by a taxpayer
prior to the time the taxpayer
establishes a mixed straddle using
straddle-by-straddle identification. The
text of these temporary regulations also
serves as the text of the proposed
regulations (REG–112815–12) set forth
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
46808
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
in the Proposed Rules section in this
issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on August 1, 2013.
Applicability Date: For the date of
applicability, see § 1.1092(b)–6T(c).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth M. Bouzis or Robert B.
Williams at (202) 622–3950 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
The Tax Reform Act of 1984 (Pub. L.
98–369, 98 Stat. 494) amended section
1092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) to add, among other items, an
election to establish a mixed straddle
using straddle-by-straddle identification
(a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle).
On January 24, 1985, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking by crossreference to temporary regulations (50
FR 3351, January 24, 1985). Included in
the temporary regulations was
§ 1.1092(b)–3T (TD 8008, 1985–1 CB
276), which describes how to account
for a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle. In particular, § 1.1092(b)–
3T(b)(6) currently requires that
unrealized gain or loss on a position
that becomes a position in a section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle be
recognized on the day prior to
establishing the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle. After filing of
these temporary regulations in the
Federal Register, § 1.1092(b)–3T(b)(6)
will apply to only those section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddles
established on or before August 1, 2013.
The approach taken in § 1.1092(b)–
3T(b)(6) is suggested by the legislative
history of section 1092, but it has come
to the attention of the Treasury
Department and the IRS that this
paragraph arguably permits taxpayers to
selectively recognize gains and losses in
inappropriate circumstances and
without market constraints. Thus, for
example, a taxpayer could seek to use
the identified mixed straddle rules in
§ 1.1092(b)–3T(b)(6) to accelerate a loss
on a position that could not be marked
to market or easily disposed of. When
taxpayers use the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle rules to serve
as an alternative to selling or otherwise
disposing of a position, the general rules
governing when gain and loss are
recognized are undermined. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that it is appropriate to act
promptly to prevent these types of
transactions because they represent a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Aug 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
use of section 1092 that was not
intended. Accordingly, these temporary
regulations add a new § 1.1092(b)–6T
and limit the application of § 1.1092(b)–
3T as described in this preamble.
Section 1.1092(b)–6T will apply to all
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddles established after August 1,
2013.
Section 1.1092(b)–6T provides that
unrealized gain or loss on a position
held prior to establishing a section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle is
taken into account at the time, and has
the character, provided by provisions of
the Code that would apply if the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle had
not been established, rather than on the
day prior to establishing the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle as
is required by § 1.1092(b)–3T(b)(6).
Section 1.1092(b)–6T does not,
however, override other provisions that
require the recognition of gain or loss.
Thus, for example, if a taxpayer enters
into a transaction that creates a
constructive sale under section 1259,
the rules of section 1259 continue to
apply. Under § 1.1092(b)–6T, the
provisions of § 1.1092(b)–3T, with the
exception of § 1.1092(b)–3T(b)(6), will
also continue to apply to changes in the
value of a position held after a section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle is
established. As a result, pre-straddle
gain or loss will be accounted for under
other provisions of the Code, while gain
or loss incurred while the straddle is in
place will be accounted for using the
straddle rules in section 1092. Under
§ 1.1092(b)–6T, the holding period of a
position held prior to establishing a
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle will continue to be determined
using the rules in § 1.1092(b)–2T.
It is important to account for prestraddle gain and loss separately from
gain and loss on positions while a
straddle is in place. Therefore,
§ 1.1092(b)–6T will continue to require
the segregation of pre-straddle and
straddle period gain and loss, but it will
do so without requiring current
recognition of unrealized gain and loss.
Section 1.1092(b)–6T will apply to all
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddles established after August 1,
2013, regardless of when any position
that is a component of the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle was
purchased or otherwise acquired.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
regulations. For the applicability of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) refer to the Special Analyses
section of the preamble to the crossreference notice of proposed rulemaking
published in the Proposed Rules section
in this issue of the Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
these regulations have been submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
comment on their impact on small
business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Elizabeth M. Bouzis,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products).
However, other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding entries
in numerical order to read as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.1092(b)–6T also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1092(b)(1).
Section 1.1092(b)–6T also issued under 26
U.S.C. 1092(b)(2). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.1092(b)–3T is
amended by:
■ 1. Revising the paragraph heading of
paragraph (b)(6).
■ 2. Adding a new first sentence to
paragraph (b)(6).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 1.1092(b)–3T Mixed straddles; straddleby-straddle identification under section
1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(I) (Temporary).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) Accrued gain and loss with respect
to positions of a section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle established on
or before August 1, 2013. The rules of
this paragraph (b)(6) apply to all section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddles
established on or before August 1, 2013;
see § 1.1092(b)–6T for section 1092(b)(2)
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
identified mixed straddles established
after August 1, 2013.* * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 3. Section 1.1092(b)–6T is added
to read as follows:
§ 1.1092(b)–6T Mixed straddles; accrued
gain and loss associated with a position
that becomes part of a section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle that is established
after August 1, 2013 (Temporary).
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) In general. Except as otherwise
provided, if one or more positions of a
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle were held by the taxpayer on
the day prior to the day the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle is
established, any unrealized gain or loss
on the day prior to the day the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle is
established with respect to such
position or positions is taken into
account at the time, and has the
character, provided by the provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code that would
apply to the gain or loss if the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle
were not established. Unrealized gain or
loss is the difference between the fair
market value of the position or positions
on the day before a section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle is established
and the taxpayer’s basis in that position
or positions. See § 1.1092(b)–2T for
treatment of holding periods with
respect to such positions. Changes in
value of the position or positions that
occur after the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle is established
are accounted for under the other
provisions of § 1.1092(b)–3T.
(b) Examples. Paragraph (a) of this
section may be illustrated by the
following examples. It is assumed in
each example that the positions are the
only positions held directly or
indirectly (through a related person or
flowthrough entity) by an individual
calendar year taxpayer during the
taxable year and no section 1256
contract is substantially identical to an
offsetting non-section 1256 contract. It
is also assumed that any gain or loss
recognized on disposition of any
position in the straddle would be capital
gain or loss.
Example 1. On August 13, 2013, A enters
into a section 1256 contract. As of the close
of the day on August 15, 2013, there is $500
of unrealized loss on the section 1256
contract. On August 16, 2013, A enters into
an offsetting non-section 1256 position and
makes a valid election to treat the straddle as
a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle. A continues to hold both positions
of the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Aug 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
straddle on January 1, 2014. Under these
circumstances, A will recognize the $500 loss
on the section 1256 contract that existed
prior to establishing the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle on the last business
day of 2013 because the section 1256 contract
would be treated as sold on December 31,
2013, (the last business day of the taxable
year) under section 1256(a). The loss
recognized in 2013 will be treated as 60%
long-term capital loss and 40% short-term
capital loss. All gains and losses occurring
after the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle is established are accounted for
under the applicable provisions in
§ 1.1092(b)–3T.
Example 2. On September 3, 2012, A enters
into a non-section 1256 position. As of the
close of the day on August 22, 2013, there is
$400 of unrealized short-term capital gain on
the non-section 1256 position. On August 23,
2013, A enters into an offsetting section 1256
contract and makes a valid election to treat
the straddle as a section 1092(b)(2) identified
mixed straddle. On September 10, 2013, A
closes out the section 1256 contract at a $500
loss and disposes of the non-section 1256
position, realizing an $875 gain. Under these
circumstances, A has $400 of short-term
capital gain attributable to the non-section
1256 position prior to the day the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle was
established. The $400 unrealized gain earned
on the non-section 1256 position will be
recognized on September 10, 2013, when the
non-section 1256 position is disposed of. The
gain will be short-term capital gain because,
if the non-section 1256 position had been
disposed of prior to establishing the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle, the gain
would not have been long-term capital gain.
See § 1.1092(b)–2T for rules concerning
holding period. On September 10, 2013, the
gain of $875 on the non-section 1256 position
will be reduced to $475 to take into account
the $400 of unrealized gain when the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle was
established. The $475 gain on the nonsection 1256 position will be offset by the
$500 loss on the section 1256 contract. The
net loss of $25 from the straddle will be
treated as 60% long-term capital loss and
40% short-term capital loss because it is
attributable to the section 1256 contract.
(c) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of this section apply to all section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddles
established after August 1, 2013.
(d) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on August 1,
2016.
Beth Tucker,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations
Support.
Approved: June 16, 2013.
Mark J. Mazur
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–1036]
Safety Zones and Special Local
Regulations; Recurring Marine Events
in Captain of the Port Long Island
Sound Zone
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
special local regulations for one regatta
and seven safety zones for five fireworks
displays and two swim events in the
Sector Long Island Sound area of
responsibility on the dates and times
listed in the tables below. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waterways during the
events. During the enforcement period,
no person or vessel may enter the
regulated area or safety zones without
permission of the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Sector Long Island Sound or
designated representative.
SUMMARY:
The regulations in 33 CFR
100.100 and 33 CFR 165.151 will be
enforced during the dates and times that
follow in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
DATES:
If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email Petty Officer Scott
Baumgartner, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Long
Island Sound; telephone 203–468–4559,
email Scott.A.Baumgartner@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Coast
Guard will enforce the regulated area
listed in 33 CFR 100.100 and safety
zones listed in 33 CFR 165.151 on the
specified dates and times as indicated in
tables that follow. If the event is delayed
by inclement weather, the regulation
will be enforced on the rain date
indicated in tables below. These
regulations were published in the
Federal Register on May 24, 2013 (78
FR 31402).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–18702 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46809
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 149 (Friday, August 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46807-46809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18702]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9627]
RIN 1545-BL04
Mixed Straddles; Straddle-by-Straddle Identification Under
Section 1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(I)
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains guidance for those taxpayers electing
to establish a mixed straddle using straddle-by-straddle
identification. These temporary regulations explain how to account for
unrealized gain or loss on a position held by a taxpayer prior to the
time the taxpayer establishes a mixed straddle using straddle-by-
straddle identification. The text of these temporary regulations also
serves as the text of the proposed regulations (REG-112815-12) set
forth
[[Page 46808]]
in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on August 1,
2013.
Applicability Date: For the date of applicability, see Sec.
1.1092(b)-6T(c).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth M. Bouzis or Robert B.
Williams at (202) 622-3950 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of Provisions
The Tax Reform Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 494) amended
section 1092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to add, among other
items, an election to establish a mixed straddle using straddle-by-
straddle identification (a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle).
On January 24, 1985, the Treasury Department and the IRS published
a notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary
regulations (50 FR 3351, January 24, 1985). Included in the temporary
regulations was Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T (TD 8008, 1985-1 CB 276), which
describes how to account for a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle. In particular, Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T(b)(6) currently requires
that unrealized gain or loss on a position that becomes a position in a
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle be recognized on the day
prior to establishing the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle.
After filing of these temporary regulations in the Federal Register,
Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T(b)(6) will apply to only those section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddles established on or before August 1, 2013.
The approach taken in Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T(b)(6) is suggested by the
legislative history of section 1092, but it has come to the attention
of the Treasury Department and the IRS that this paragraph arguably
permits taxpayers to selectively recognize gains and losses in
inappropriate circumstances and without market constraints. Thus, for
example, a taxpayer could seek to use the identified mixed straddle
rules in Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T(b)(6) to accelerate a loss on a position
that could not be marked to market or easily disposed of. When
taxpayers use the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle rules to
serve as an alternative to selling or otherwise disposing of a
position, the general rules governing when gain and loss are recognized
are undermined. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that it is
appropriate to act promptly to prevent these types of transactions
because they represent a use of section 1092 that was not intended.
Accordingly, these temporary regulations add a new Sec. 1.1092(b)-6T
and limit the application of Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T as described in this
preamble. Section 1.1092(b)-6T will apply to all section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddles established after August 1, 2013.
Section 1.1092(b)-6T provides that unrealized gain or loss on a
position held prior to establishing a section 1092(b)(2) identified
mixed straddle is taken into account at the time, and has the
character, provided by provisions of the Code that would apply if the
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle had not been established,
rather than on the day prior to establishing the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle as is required by Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T(b)(6).
Section 1.1092(b)-6T does not, however, override other provisions that
require the recognition of gain or loss. Thus, for example, if a
taxpayer enters into a transaction that creates a constructive sale
under section 1259, the rules of section 1259 continue to apply. Under
Sec. 1.1092(b)-6T, the provisions of Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T, with the
exception of Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T(b)(6), will also continue to apply to
changes in the value of a position held after a section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle is established. As a result, pre-straddle
gain or loss will be accounted for under other provisions of the Code,
while gain or loss incurred while the straddle is in place will be
accounted for using the straddle rules in section 1092. Under Sec.
1.1092(b)-6T, the holding period of a position held prior to
establishing a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle will
continue to be determined using the rules in Sec. 1.1092(b)-2T.
It is important to account for pre-straddle gain and loss
separately from gain and loss on positions while a straddle is in
place. Therefore, Sec. 1.1092(b)-6T will continue to require the
segregation of pre-straddle and straddle period gain and loss, but it
will do so without requiring current recognition of unrealized gain and
loss.
Section 1.1092(b)-6T will apply to all section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddles established after August 1, 2013, regardless
of when any position that is a component of the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle was purchased or otherwise acquired.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations. For the applicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) refer to the Special Analyses
section of the preamble to the cross-reference notice of proposed
rulemaking published in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the
Federal Register. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these
regulations have been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small
business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Elizabeth M. Bouzis,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and
Products). However, other personnel from the Treasury Department and
the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding
entries in numerical order to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.1092(b)-6T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1092(b)(1).
Section 1.1092(b)-6T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 1092(b)(2). * *
*
0
Par. 2. Section 1.1092(b)-3T is amended by:
0
1. Revising the paragraph heading of paragraph (b)(6).
0
2. Adding a new first sentence to paragraph (b)(6).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T Mixed straddles; straddle-by-straddle
identification under section 1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(I) (Temporary).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) Accrued gain and loss with respect to positions of a section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle established on or before August 1,
2013. The rules of this paragraph (b)(6) apply to all section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddles established on or before August
1, 2013; see Sec. 1.1092(b)-6T for section 1092(b)(2)
[[Page 46809]]
identified mixed straddles established after August 1, 2013.* * *
* * * * *
0
Par. 3. Section 1.1092(b)-6T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1092(b)-6T Mixed straddles; accrued gain and loss associated
with a position that becomes part of a section 1092(b)(2) identified
mixed straddle that is established after August 1, 2013 (Temporary).
(a) In general. Except as otherwise provided, if one or more
positions of a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle were held
by the taxpayer on the day prior to the day the section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle is established, any unrealized gain or loss
on the day prior to the day the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle is established with respect to such position or positions is
taken into account at the time, and has the character, provided by the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that would apply to the gain or
loss if the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle were not
established. Unrealized gain or loss is the difference between the fair
market value of the position or positions on the day before a section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle is established and the taxpayer's
basis in that position or positions. See Sec. 1.1092(b)-2T for
treatment of holding periods with respect to such positions. Changes in
value of the position or positions that occur after the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle is established are accounted for
under the other provisions of Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T.
(b) Examples. Paragraph (a) of this section may be illustrated by
the following examples. It is assumed in each example that the
positions are the only positions held directly or indirectly (through a
related person or flowthrough entity) by an individual calendar year
taxpayer during the taxable year and no section 1256 contract is
substantially identical to an offsetting non-section 1256 contract. It
is also assumed that any gain or loss recognized on disposition of any
position in the straddle would be capital gain or loss.
Example 1. On August 13, 2013, A enters into a section 1256
contract. As of the close of the day on August 15, 2013, there is
$500 of unrealized loss on the section 1256 contract. On August 16,
2013, A enters into an offsetting non-section 1256 position and
makes a valid election to treat the straddle as a section 1092(b)(2)
identified mixed straddle. A continues to hold both positions of the
section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle on January 1, 2014.
Under these circumstances, A will recognize the $500 loss on the
section 1256 contract that existed prior to establishing the section
1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle on the last business day of
2013 because the section 1256 contract would be treated as sold on
December 31, 2013, (the last business day of the taxable year) under
section 1256(a). The loss recognized in 2013 will be treated as 60%
long-term capital loss and 40% short-term capital loss. All gains
and losses occurring after the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle is established are accounted for under the applicable
provisions in Sec. 1.1092(b)-3T.
Example 2. On September 3, 2012, A enters into a non-section
1256 position. As of the close of the day on August 22, 2013, there
is $400 of unrealized short-term capital gain on the non-section
1256 position. On August 23, 2013, A enters into an offsetting
section 1256 contract and makes a valid election to treat the
straddle as a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle. On
September 10, 2013, A closes out the section 1256 contract at a $500
loss and disposes of the non-section 1256 position, realizing an
$875 gain. Under these circumstances, A has $400 of short-term
capital gain attributable to the non-section 1256 position prior to
the day the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle was
established. The $400 unrealized gain earned on the non-section 1256
position will be recognized on September 10, 2013, when the non-
section 1256 position is disposed of. The gain will be short-term
capital gain because, if the non-section 1256 position had been
disposed of prior to establishing the section 1092(b)(2) identified
mixed straddle, the gain would not have been long-term capital gain.
See Sec. 1.1092(b)-2T for rules concerning holding period. On
September 10, 2013, the gain of $875 on the non-section 1256
position will be reduced to $475 to take into account the $400 of
unrealized gain when the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed
straddle was established. The $475 gain on the non-section 1256
position will be offset by the $500 loss on the section 1256
contract. The net loss of $25 from the straddle will be treated as
60% long-term capital loss and 40% short-term capital loss because
it is attributable to the section 1256 contract.
(c) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section apply
to all section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddles established after
August 1, 2013.
(d) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
August 1, 2016.
Beth Tucker,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support.
Approved: June 16, 2013.
Mark J. Mazur
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2013-18702 Filed 8-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P