Proposed Policy for Discontinuance of Certain Instrument Approach Procedures, 47047-47048 [2013-17940]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Notices
Dated: July 19, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–18670 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0265]
Proposed Policy for Discontinuance of
Certain Instrument Approach
Procedures
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed policy and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
As, new technology facilitates
the introduction of area navigation
(RNAV) instrument approach
procedures over the past decade, the
number of procedures available in the
National Airspace System has nearly
doubled. The complexity and cost to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
of maintaining the existing ground
based navigational infrastructure while
expanding the new RNAV capability is
not sustainable. The FAA is considering
the cancellation of certain Nondirectional Beacon (NDB) and Very High
Frequency (VHF) Omnidirectional
Radio Range (VOR) instrument
approach procedures (IAP) at airports
that have multiple instrument approach
procedures. The FAA proposes specific
criteria to guide the identification and
selection of appropriate NDB and VOR
instrument approach procedures that
can be considered for cancellation. The
VOR IAPs associated with this
cancellation initiative would be selected
from the criteria outlined below. This
Notice is not a part of the FAA’s VOR
minimum operating network (MON)
initiative.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before October 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number 2013–0265 using any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Aug 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at (202) 493–2251.
• Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
• Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
This proposal is subject to change after
review of public comments.
For
questions concerning this action,
contact Mr. Larry Strout, Aeronautical
Navigational Products, Terminal
Products Group, Central Products Team
Manager, Air Traffic Organization, AJV–
353, Federal Aviation Administration,
6500 S. MacArthur BLVD, Oklahoma
City, OK 73169; telephone (405) 954–
5070, email AMC–ATO–IFPCancellations@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
Title 49 of the United States Code,
section 40103, vests the Administrator
with broad authority to regulate the safe
and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. The Administrator is
authorized to issue rules and regulations
to govern the flight, navigation,
protection, and identification of aircraft
for the protection of persons and
property on the ground, and for the
efficient use of the navigable airspace
(49 U.S.C. 40103(b)). The Administrator
also is authorized under § 44701(a)(5) to
promote safe flight of civil aircraft in air
commerce by prescribing regulations
and minimum standards for other
practices, methods, and procedures
necessary for safety in air commerce and
national security.
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47047
Background
The FAA is continuing to expand the
availability and capability of area
navigation (RNAV) to improve safety
and efficiency within the National
Airspace System (NAS). A major
enhancement is the introduction of
Wide Area Augmentation System
(WAAS) capable RNAV instrument
approach procedures that provide for
near-precision vertical guidance.
As a result of new RNAV instrument
approach procedures, the number of
instrument approach procedures
available to the public has nearly
doubled over the past decade and will
continue to grow with the public’s
demand for new WAAS procedures. The
complexity and cost of maintaining
existing ground-based navigational
infrastructure while expanding new
RNAV capability is exceeding the FAA’s
current staffing and budget allocations
and projections over the next five years.
To meet the public’s demand for WAAS
capable RNAV procedures, the FAA
must manage the growth in the number
of instrument approach procedures and
finds that certain redundant groundbased procedures can be eliminated
without affecting safety or access to
airports.
To help identify viable strategies for
cancellation of ground-based
procedures, the FAA awarded a grant to
the Flight Safety Foundation. In
conducting its research, the Flight
Safety Foundation held meetings with
FAA and Department of Defense (DOD)
personnel and key industry interest
groups. Outreach conducted by the
Foundation identified that most NDB
procedures are no longer desired, except
in support of certain DOD operations
and flight schools. The Flight Safety
Foundation also found user support for
cancelling some VOR procedures when
multiple IAPs are available. Results of
the Flight Safety Foundation study were
published in the report titled ‘‘A
Recommended Process: Safely Reducing
Redundant or Underutilized Instrument
Approach Procedures.’’ The report is
available for review at: https://www.faa.
gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/
procedures/reports/media/FAA_Grant_
Flight_Safety_Foundation_Inc2010G023.pdf.
By this notice, the FAA seeks
comments on proposed criteria that
would facilitate the FAA’s
determination of which procedures can
be considered for cancellation. After
reviewing the comments submitted to
this notice, the FAA will use the criteria
for selection of potential NDB and VOR
procedures for cancellation. Once the
criteria are established and the FAA
E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM
02AUN1
47048
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 149 / Friday, August 2, 2013 / Notices
considers IAPs for cancellation, the
FAA will publish a list of potential IAPs
in the Federal Register for notice and
comment. Submitted comments will be
reviewed and addressed in the final list
of subject IAPs published in the Federal
Register. The criteria proposed in this
notice does not affect any NAS
navigational back-up plans and is not a
part of the FAA’s VOR minimum
operating network (MON) initiative.
Proposed Policy
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The NDB and VOR IAPs
recommended for cancellation would be
selected at airports using the following
criteria. It must be noted that all airports
that have existing RNAV and groundbased IAPs would maintain at least one
RNAV and one ground-based IAP.
Airports that would be considered for
NDB or VOR IAP cancellation:
— All airports with an NDB IAP.
—All airports with a VOR/DME RNAV
IAP, unless it is the only IAP at the
airport.
—All airports with two or more groundbased IAPs and an RNAV IAP.
—All airports with multiple, redundant
ground-based IAPs (e.g., three VOR
procedures).
Additional consideration would be
given to the following factors in
determining the list of potential
candidates for cancellation:
—Prevailing wind runways.
—Prevailing runway alignment during
adverse weather operations.
—If an airport has a published ILS IAP
and additional ground-based IAPs,
cancel the procedure to the same
runway as the ILS.
—For airports with multiple VOR and
NDB IAP’s, retain the IAP with the
lowest minimums (if minimums are
within 20 feet of each other retain the
procedure that allows optimum use
by all customers (i.e. VOR and VOR/
DME retain VOR because there are no
equipage limitations).
Airports that would not be considered
for NDB or VOR IAP cancellations:
—Airport with only RNAV/RNPs IAPs
published.
—Airport with only one ground-based
procedure.
—Airports will not be considered if
cancellation would result in removing
all IAPs from the airport.
Lastly, the FAA is not considering the
following types of procedures for
cancellation:
PBN Procedures (RNAV or RNP).
ILS procedures.
Localizer procedures.
TACAN procedures.
Standard Instrument Arrivals (STARs).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Aug 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs).
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Comments Invited
Federal Aviation Administration
The FAA invites interested parties to
submit written comments, data, or
views. The agency also invites
comments relating to the economic,
environmental, energy, or federalism
impacts that might result from adopting
the proposals in this document. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written
comments or, if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments it receives. Before acting on
this proposal, the FAA will consider all
comments it receives on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The agency may
change this proposal in light of the
comments it receives.
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information: Commenters should not
file proprietary or confidential business
information in the docket. Such
information must be sent or delivered
directly to the person identified in the
Notice of Availability of Final
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
EIS)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this document, and marked as
proprietary or confidential. If submitting
information on a disk or CD–ROM, mark
the outside of the disk or CD–ROM, and
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), the FAA is
aware of proprietary information filed
with a comment, the agency does not
place it in the docket. It is held in a
separate file to which the public does
not have access and the FAA places a
note in the docket that it has received
it. If the FAA receives a request to
examine or copy this information, it
treats it as any other request under the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552). The FAA processes such a request
under Department of Transportation
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 19,
2013.
Abigail Smith,
Aeronautical Navigation Products, Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–17940 Filed 8–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Aviation
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of availability of Final
EIS.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR Part 1500–1508),
the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) is issuing this notice to advise the
public that a Final EIS for proposed
improvements to Runway Safety Areas
at the Kodiak Airport has been prepared
and is available for public review.
Included in the Final EIS are a
Subsistence Evaluation consistent with
Section 810 of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act and a
final evaluation pursuant to Section 4(f)
of the Department of Transportation Act
of 1966 (recodified as 49 U.S.C. 303(c)).
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EIS may
be viewed online or during regular
business hours at the following
locations:
1. Online at
www.kodiakairporteis.com.
2. Federal Aviation Administration,
Airports Division, 222 W. 7th Avenue
#14, Anchorage, AK 99513–7587. (907)
271–5453.
3. Holmes Johnson Memorial Library,
319 Lower Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, AK
99615. (907) 486–8680.
4. Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities,
4111 Aviation Avenue, Anchorage, AK
99502.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie Grey, Environmental Specialist,
Federal Aviation Administration,
Alaskan Region, Airports Division,
address 222 W. 7th Avenue Box #14,
Anchorage, AK 99513. Ms. Grey may be
contacted during business hours at (907)
271–5453 (telephone) and (907) 271–
2851 (fax), or by email at
Leslie.Grey@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Final
EIS discusses proposed improvements
to the Runway Safety Areas for Runway
07/25 and Runway 18/36, which have
the potential to result in significant
adverse environmental impacts. The
FAA has identified the following
preferred alternatives to meet the need
for improved Runway Safety Areas:
• Improvements to the Runway Safety
Area for Runway 07/25: Alternative 2,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM
02AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 149 (Friday, August 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47047-47048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17940]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0265]
Proposed Policy for Discontinuance of Certain Instrument Approach
Procedures
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed policy and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As, new technology facilitates the introduction of area
navigation (RNAV) instrument approach procedures over the past decade,
the number of procedures available in the National Airspace System has
nearly doubled. The complexity and cost to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) of maintaining the existing ground based
navigational infrastructure while expanding the new RNAV capability is
not sustainable. The FAA is considering the cancellation of certain
Non-directional Beacon (NDB) and Very High Frequency (VHF)
Omnidirectional Radio Range (VOR) instrument approach procedures (IAP)
at airports that have multiple instrument approach procedures. The FAA
proposes specific criteria to guide the identification and selection of
appropriate NDB and VOR instrument approach procedures that can be
considered for cancellation. The VOR IAPs associated with this
cancellation initiative would be selected from the criteria outlined
below. This Notice is not a part of the FAA's VOR minimum operating
network (MON) initiative.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number 2013-0265 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at (202) 493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be
read at https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-
140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. This proposal is subject to change after
review of public comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning this action,
contact Mr. Larry Strout, Aeronautical Navigational Products, Terminal
Products Group, Central Products Team Manager, Air Traffic
Organization, AJV-353, Federal Aviation Administration, 6500 S.
MacArthur BLVD, Oklahoma City, OK 73169; telephone (405) 954-5070,
email AMC-ATO-IFP-Cancellations@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
Title 49 of the United States Code, section 40103, vests the
Administrator with broad authority to regulate the safe and efficient
use of the navigable airspace. The Administrator is authorized to issue
rules and regulations to govern the flight, navigation, protection, and
identification of aircraft for the protection of persons and property
on the ground, and for the efficient use of the navigable airspace (49
U.S.C. 40103(b)). The Administrator also is authorized under Sec.
44701(a)(5) to promote safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations and minimum standards for other practices,
methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce and
national security.
Background
The FAA is continuing to expand the availability and capability of
area navigation (RNAV) to improve safety and efficiency within the
National Airspace System (NAS). A major enhancement is the introduction
of Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) capable RNAV instrument
approach procedures that provide for near-precision vertical guidance.
As a result of new RNAV instrument approach procedures, the number
of instrument approach procedures available to the public has nearly
doubled over the past decade and will continue to grow with the
public's demand for new WAAS procedures. The complexity and cost of
maintaining existing ground-based navigational infrastructure while
expanding new RNAV capability is exceeding the FAA's current staffing
and budget allocations and projections over the next five years. To
meet the public's demand for WAAS capable RNAV procedures, the FAA must
manage the growth in the number of instrument approach procedures and
finds that certain redundant ground-based procedures can be eliminated
without affecting safety or access to airports.
To help identify viable strategies for cancellation of ground-based
procedures, the FAA awarded a grant to the Flight Safety Foundation. In
conducting its research, the Flight Safety Foundation held meetings
with FAA and Department of Defense (DOD) personnel and key industry
interest groups. Outreach conducted by the Foundation identified that
most NDB procedures are no longer desired, except in support of certain
DOD operations and flight schools. The Flight Safety Foundation also
found user support for cancelling some VOR procedures when multiple
IAPs are available. Results of the Flight Safety Foundation study were
published in the report titled ``A Recommended Process: Safely Reducing
Redundant or Underutilized Instrument Approach Procedures.'' The report
is available for review at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/procedures/reports/media/FAA_Grant_Flight_Safety_Foundation_Inc-2010G023.pdf.
By this notice, the FAA seeks comments on proposed criteria that
would facilitate the FAA's determination of which procedures can be
considered for cancellation. After reviewing the comments submitted to
this notice, the FAA will use the criteria for selection of potential
NDB and VOR procedures for cancellation. Once the criteria are
established and the FAA
[[Page 47048]]
considers IAPs for cancellation, the FAA will publish a list of
potential IAPs in the Federal Register for notice and comment.
Submitted comments will be reviewed and addressed in the final list of
subject IAPs published in the Federal Register. The criteria proposed
in this notice does not affect any NAS navigational back-up plans and
is not a part of the FAA's VOR minimum operating network (MON)
initiative.
Proposed Policy
The NDB and VOR IAPs recommended for cancellation would be selected
at airports using the following criteria. It must be noted that all
airports that have existing RNAV and ground-based IAPs would maintain
at least one RNAV and one ground-based IAP.
Airports that would be considered for NDB or VOR IAP cancellation:
-- All airports with an NDB IAP.
--All airports with a VOR/DME RNAV IAP, unless it is the only IAP at
the airport.
--All airports with two or more ground-based IAPs and an RNAV IAP.
--All airports with multiple, redundant ground-based IAPs (e.g., three
VOR procedures).
Additional consideration would be given to the following factors in
determining the list of potential candidates for cancellation:
--Prevailing wind runways.
--Prevailing runway alignment during adverse weather operations.
--If an airport has a published ILS IAP and additional ground-based
IAPs, cancel the procedure to the same runway as the ILS.
--For airports with multiple VOR and NDB IAP's, retain the IAP with the
lowest minimums (if minimums are within 20 feet of each other retain
the procedure that allows optimum use by all customers (i.e. VOR and
VOR/DME retain VOR because there are no equipage limitations).
Airports that would not be considered for NDB or VOR IAP
cancellations:
--Airport with only RNAV/RNPs IAPs published.
--Airport with only one ground-based procedure.
--Airports will not be considered if cancellation would result in
removing all IAPs from the airport.
Lastly, the FAA is not considering the following types of
procedures for cancellation:
PBN Procedures (RNAV or RNP).
ILS procedures.
Localizer procedures.
TACAN procedures.
Standard Instrument Arrivals (STARs).
Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs).
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested parties to submit written comments,
data, or views. The agency also invites comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments or, if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives. Before
acting on this proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives
on or before the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider
comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to
do so without incurring expense or delay. The agency may change this
proposal in light of the comments it receives.
Proprietary or Confidential Business Information: Commenters should
not file proprietary or confidential business information in the
docket. Such information must be sent or delivered directly to the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document, and marked as proprietary or confidential. If submitting
information on a disk or CD-ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD-
ROM, and identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), the FAA is aware of proprietary information
filed with a comment, the agency does not place it in the docket. It is
held in a separate file to which the public does not have access and
the FAA places a note in the docket that it has received it. If the FAA
receives a request to examine or copy this information, it treats it as
any other request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
The FAA processes such a request under Department of Transportation
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 19, 2013.
Abigail Smith,
Aeronautical Navigation Products, Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-17940 Filed 8-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P