Surety Bond Guarantee Program, 46528-46532 [2013-18530]
Download as PDF
46528
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 148
Thursday, August 1, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 115
RIN 3245–AG56
Surety Bond Guarantee Program
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
conform the regulations governing the
Surety Bond Guarantee Program to
certain provisions of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (NDAA), including the
provisions that increase the contract
amounts for which SBA is authorized to
guarantee bonds, grant SBA the
authority to partially deny liability
under its bond guarantee, and prohibit
SBA from denying liability based on
material information that was provided
as part of the guarantee application in
the Prior Approval Program. In addition,
changes are proposed with respect to
the Quick Bond Guarantee Application
and Agreement, the timeframes for
taking certain actions related to claims,
the dollar threshold for determining
when a change in the Contract or bond
amounts meets certain criteria or
requires certain action, and the
elimination of references to the
provisions of the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act) that have expired.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3245–AG56, by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Surety Guarantees,
Suite 8600, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of
Surety Guarantees, 409 Third Street
SW., Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Office of
Surety Guarantees, 409 Third Street
SW., Washington, DC 20416 or send an
email to the Office of Surety Guarantees.
Highlight the information that you
consider to be CBI and explain why you
believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination whether it will
publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara J. Brannan, Office of Surety
Guarantees, 202–205–6545, email:
Barbara.brannan@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) guarantees bid,
payment and performance bonds for
small and emerging contractors who
cannot obtain surety bonds through
regular commercial channels. SBA’s
guarantee gives Sureties an incentive to
provide bonding for small businesses
and, thereby, assists small businesses in
obtaining greater access to contracting
opportunities. SBA’s guarantee is an
agreement between a Surety and SBA
that SBA will assume a certain
percentage of the Surety’s loss should a
contractor default on the underlying
contract. This proposed rule would
make the following changes to the
program:
A. Conform Regulations to NDAA
This proposed rule would conform
the regulations governing the Surety
Bond Guarantee Program to the
following changes enacted by the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013, Public Law 112–239,
126 Stat. 1632:
(1) Increasing the contract amount for
which SBA is authorized to guarantee
bonds from $2 million to $6.5 million
(as adjusted for inflation in accordance
with 41 U.S.C. 1908);
(2) increasing the contract amount for
which SBA is authorized to guarantee
bonds to $10 million with a Federal
contracting officer’s certification that
the guarantee is necessary for the small
business to obtain bonding;
(3) authorizing SBA to deny liability
under its bond guarantee in whole or in
part within its discretion; and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) prohibiting SBA from denying
liability based on material information
that was provided as part of the
guarantee application in the Prior
Approval Program.
B. Partial Subcontract
The existing regulation, 13 CFR
115.13(a)(5), states that SBA will not
guarantee bonds for Principals ‘‘who are
primarily brokers or who have
effectively transferred control over the
project to one or more subcontractors.’’
Surety companies and agents have
questioned the meaning of the phrase
‘‘effectively transferred control over the
project’’, and SBA agrees that clearer
guidance is needed to determine when
the use of subcontractors becomes
objectionable. SBA recognizes that
many small general contractors may
subcontract a high percentage of the
work under a contract, and this is not
necessarily objectionable. However,
SBA does not want the subcontracting
to result in the Principal—the Person
primarily liable to complete the
Contract—losing control over the
project. In the most egregious cases, the
Principal may be acting as a front for the
subcontractor. This objectionable
activity may not be discernible solely
from the percentage of work
subcontracted on a project. Although
that is often a good indicator, SBA
believes that control is also a function
of who has responsibility for overseeing
and managing the work performed
under the Contract. Accordingly, SBA is
proposing to revise the second sentence
of this provision to clarify that, to be
eligible for a bond guaranteed by SBA,
the Principal must retain full
responsibility for the oversight and
management of the Contract, including
any work performed by any
subcontractor, and may not subcontract
the full scope of the statement of work.
C. Quick Bond
The proposed rule would revise the
regulations governing the Quick Bond
Guarantee Application and Agreement.
Under 13 CFR 115.30(d)(2)(ii)(C), the
Quick Bond Application and Agreement
(SBA Form 990A) may not be used for
any contract that includes a warranty/
maintenance period exceeding 12
months. However, the definition of
Contract in 13 CFR 115.10 allows for the
Contract to include a maintenance
agreement of 2 years or less (for
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
defective workmanship or materials
only), and also allows, with SBA’s
written approval, for longer
maintenance agreements and broader
coverage. SBA has reassessed the need
for this exclusion, and is proposing to
delete the 12 month warranty/
maintenance exclusion from 13 CFR
115.30(d)(2)(ii)(C).
In addition, under 13 CFR
115.30(d)(2)(ii)(D), SBA Form 990A may
not be used if the contract includes a
provision for liquidated damages that
exceed $250 per day. The proposed rule
would increase to $1,000 per day the
amount of liquidated damages subject to
the exclusion. SBA received suggestions
from the surety industry for this
increase, which is consistent with
industry standards for a streamlined
application process.
By making the above changes, the
Agency hopes to encourage greater use
of the Quick Bond Guarantee
Application and Agreement.
D. Increasing Certain Dollar Thresholds
The rule proposes to amend the
following provisions to change the
dollar threshold for determining when a
change in the Contract or bond amounts
may result in denial of liability or
requires certain action. Currently, these
provisions provide that the thresholds
are met when the Contract or bond
amount changes by 25% or $50,000,
whichever is less. This formula means
that the $50,000 threshold is always the
lesser amount for contracts that are
greater than $200,000, and the average
amount of a Contract is now
approximately twice this amount, or
$400,000. In addition, for some of the
provisions, the $50,000 threshold has
not changed since 1989. Further, SBA
would expect the average contract
amount to increase with the recent
increase in the maximum contract
amount to $6.5 million. Thus, SBA is
proposing to update the dollar threshold
to $100,000 for the following provisions:
(1) Under 13 CFR 115.19(c)(1), SBA is
relieved of liability if the Surety has
committed a material breach of one or
more terms or conditions of its
agreement with SBA. A material breach
is considered to have occurred if such
breach (or such breaches in the
aggregate) causes an increase in the
Contract amount or in the bond amount
of at least 25% or $50,000. The
proposed rule would increase the dollar
threshold to $100,000.
(2) Under 13 CFR 115.19(d), SBA is
relieved of liability if the Surety has
committed a substantial violation of
SBA regulations, which is defined in
part as a violation which causes an
increase in the bond amount of at least
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
25% or $50,000 in the aggregate. The
proposed rule would increase the dollar
threshold to $100,000.
(3) Under 13 CFR 115.19(e)(2), SBA is
relieved of liability if the Surety agrees
to or acquiesces in any material
alteration in the terms, conditions, or
provisions of the bond. For a Prior
Approval Surety, such alteration
includes any increase in the bond
amount of at least 25% or $50,000. The
proposed rule would increase the dollar
threshold to $100,000.
(4) Under 13 CFR 115.32(d), a Prior
Approval Surety must notify SBA of any
increases or decreases in the Contract or
bond amount that aggregate 25% or
$50,000 as soon as the Surety acquires
knowledge of the change, and also must
obtain SBA’s prior written approval of
an increase in the original bond amount
as a result of a single change order of at
least 25% or $50,000. The proposed rule
would increase these dollar thresholds
to $100,000.
(5) Under 13 CFR 115.67(a), a PSB
Surety must pay the additional fees due
from the Principal and the Surety on
increases aggregating 25% of the
contract or bond amount or $50,000.
The proposed rule would increase the
dollar threshold to $100,000.
E. Reducing Certain Timeframes
With the wide-spread use of
electronic processing of claims and
payments, SBA believes that the
timeframes for taking the following
actions could be reduced:
(1) Under 13 CFR 115.17(b), the
Surety is required to pursue all possible
sources of salvage and recovery, and
SBA is entitled to its guaranteed
percentage of all salvage and recovery.
Currently, 13 CFR 115.17(b)(2) requires
the Surety to reimburse or credit SBA
with its share within 90 days of receipt
of any recovery by the Surety; the
proposed rule would reduce this
timeframe to 45 days. Similarly, the
proposed rule would reduce the
timeframe for the Surety to pay SBA its
share of any settlement amount under
13 CFR 115.36(a)(3) from 90 days to 45
days.
(2) Under 13 CFR 115.35(c)(4) and
115.70(a), SBA pays its share of the loss
to both the Prior Approval Surety and
the PSB Surety within 90 days of receipt
of the requisite information. The
proposed rule would reduce this
timeframe to 45 days.
In addition, under 13 CFR
115.35(c)(1) and 115.70(a), both the
Prior Approval Surety and the PSB
Surety must submit to SBA a claim for
reimbursement for losses paid by the
Surety within 1 year from the time of
each disbursement. The proposed rule
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46529
would reduce this timeframe to 90 days.
This reduction would facilitate SBA’s
ability to review and verify the claim
without unnecessary delay.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 115.10. SBA is proposing to
revise the definition of ‘‘Applicable
Statutory Limit’’ to include the
maximum amounts of any Contract or
Order for which SBA is authorized by
the NDAA to guarantee, or commit to
guarantee, a Bid Bond, Payment Bond,
Performance Bond, or Ancillary Bond.
The statutory limits set by the NDAA
are: (1) $6.5 million (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1908); and (2) $10 million if a
contracting officer of a Federal agency
certifies that such guarantee is
necessary. In addition, SBA is proposing
to include a reference in the definition
to the maximum amounts of any
Contract or Order when SBA guarantees
the bond in connection with a
procurement related to a major disaster
pursuant to section 12079 of Public Law
110–246. Under this provision, which
was enacted on June 18, 2008, the
maximum amounts are (1) $5 million,
and (2) $10 million on Federal Contracts
or Orders at the request of the Head of
any Federal agency involved in
reconstruction efforts in response to a
major disaster. The authority to
guarantee bonds under this provision is
subject to the availability of funds
appropriated in advance specifically for
the purpose of guaranteeing bonds for
any Contract or Order related to a major
disaster. SBA does not expect this
authority to be often used, given
NDAA’s increase in the maximum
amounts for any Contract or Order up to
$6.5 million (and $10 million if a
Federal contracting officer certifies that
such guarantee is necessary) and the
requirement that funds be appropriated
in advance specifically for guaranteeing
bonds related to a major disaster.
Section 115.12(b). SBA is proposing
to delete the reference to the ‘‘Contract
Bonds’’ section of the current ‘‘Manual
of Rules, Procedures and Classifications
of the Surety Association of America’’,
and to replace this reference with two
specific types of bonds, Commercial and
Fidelity bonds, that are not eligible for
an SBA guarantee.
Section 115.12(e)(3). SBA is
proposing to delete this provision in its
entirety, as it relates to requirements
imposed by the Recovery Act that
expired on September 30, 2010.
Section 115.12(e)(4). SBA is
proposing to renumber this provision as
(e)(3), and to revise this provision to
reflect the authority to guarantee bonds
on Federal Contracts or Orders greater
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
46530
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
than $6.5 million, but not exceeding $10
million, upon a signed certification of a
Federal contracting officer.
Section 115.12(e)(5). SBA is
proposing to renumber this provision as
(e)(4), to revise the introductory
paragraph to clarify that this paragraph
implements an alternative statutory
authority for guaranteeing bonds for
procurements related to a major
disaster, and to delete paragraph (B)(iii)
of this provision, as it relates to
requirements imposed by the Recovery
Act that expired on September 30, 2010.
Section 115.13(a)(5). SBA is
proposing to revise this provision to
clarify that, to be eligible for a bond
guaranteed by SBA, the Principal must
retain full responsibility for the
oversight and management of the
Contract, including any work performed
by any subcontractor, and may not
subcontract the full scope of the
statement of work.
Section 115.17(b)(2). SBA is
proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a Surety to reimburse or
credit SBA for salvage and recovery
from 90 days to 45 days after the Surety
receives any salvage and recovery.
Section 115.19. SBA is proposing to
revise the introductory paragraph of this
provision to conform it to current law
by deleting the time frame reference
required by the Recovery Act, which has
expired, and by inserting the relevant
requirements of the NDAA, including
the authority of SBA to deny liability, in
whole or in part, within its discretion if
any of the circumstances in paragraphs
(a) through (h) of this section exist, and
the prohibition on denying liability
based on material information that was
provided as part of the guarantee
application in the Prior Approval
Program. SBA is also proposing to
amend section 115.19(c)(1) by
increasing the dollar threshold for
determining whether the Surety has
committed a material breach of one or
more terms or conditions of its Prior
Approval or PSB Agreement from
$50,000 to $100,000. In addition, SBA is
proposing to amend section 115.19(d)
by increasing the dollar threshold for
determining whether the Surety has
committed a substantial violation of
SBA regulations from $50,000 to
$100,000, and proposing to amend
section 115.19(e)(2) by increasing the
dollar threshold for determining
whether a Prior Approval Surety has
agreed to or acquiesced in any material
alternation in the terms, conditions, or
provisions of the bond from $50,000 to
$100,000. In each of these sections, the
phrase ‘‘whichever is less’’ is being
added after the $100,000 to clarify the
meaning of this requirement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
Section 115.30(d)(2). Under the
current 13 CFR 115.30(d)(2)(ii)(C), the
Quick Bond Application and Agreement
(SBA Form 990A) may not be used for
any contract where the time for
completion of the Contract or the
warranty/maintenance period exceeds
12 months. SBA is proposing to delete
the phrase ‘‘or the warranty/
maintenance period’’ from this
provision. In addition, under current
115.30(d)(2)(ii)(D), SBA Form 990A may
not be used for any contract that
includes a provision for liquidated
damages that exceed $250 per day. SBA
is proposing to increase the allowable
liquidated damages provision from
$250.00 per day to $1,000.00 per day.
Section 115.31(d). SBA is proposing
to revise the final sentence of this
provision by basing the example on the
current statutory limit of $6.5 million.
Section 115.32(d). SBA is proposing
to amend this provision by changing the
dollar threshold for determining when
the Prior Approval Surety must notify
SBA of the change and/or obtain SBA’s
approval from at least $50,000 to
$100,000. The phrase ‘‘whichever is
less’’ is being added to clarify the
meaning of this requirement.
Section 115.35(c)(1). SBA is
proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a Prior Approval Surety to
submit a claim to SBA from one year to
90 days after the Surety pays the claim.
In addition, the title of the SBA Form
994H, ‘‘Default Report, Claim for
Reimbursement and Record of
Administrative Action,’’ is being
changed to ‘‘Default Report, Claim for
Reimbursement and Report of
Recoveries,’’ to reflect the current
version of the form. This form is used
to process recoveries, and adding
‘‘Recoveries’’ to the title of the form
promotes its proper use.
Section 115.35(c)(4). SBA is
proposing to reduce the time frame for
SBA to pay a claim submitted by a
Surety in the Prior Approval Program
from 90 days to 45 days after receipt of
the requisite information.
Section 115.36(a)(3). SBA is
proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a Surety to reimburse SBA
its share of a settlement from 90 days to
45 days after receipt.
Section 115.67(a). SBA is proposing
to increase the dollar threshold for
determining when a PSB Surety must
present checks for additional fees due
from the Principal and the Surety from
$50,000 to $100,000. The phrase
‘‘whichever is less’’ is being added to
clarify the meaning of this requirement.
Section 115.69. This provision
currently provides that SBA will
reimburse a PSB Surety for the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
guaranteed portion of payments the
Surety makes to avoid or attempt to
avoid an Imminent Breach of the terms
of a Contract, and that the PSB Surety
does not need SBA approval to make
Imminent Breach payments. It also
provides that the aggregate of the
payments by SBA cannot exceed 10% of
the Contract amount, unless SBA finds
that a greater payment is necessary and
reasonable. For payments that exceed
10% of the Contract amount, SBA is
proposing to revise this provision to
give the PSB Surety the opportunity to
request SBA to approve the amount
prior to the Surety making the Imminent
Breach payment. SBA will approve such
payment if SBA finds that the payment
is necessary and reasonable. If the
Surety does not request prior SBA
approval for such payments, SBA may
refuse to reimburse the Surety if SBA
finds that the payment that exceeds
10% of the Contract amount was not
necessary and reasonable.
Section 115.70(a). SBA is proposing
to reduce the time frame allowed for a
PSB Surety to submit a claim to SBA
from one year to 90 days after the Surety
pays the claim. SBA is also proposing to
reduce the time frame for SBA to pay a
claim submitted by a Surety in the PSB
Program from 90 days to 45 days after
receipt of the requisite information.
Compliance with Executive Orders
12866, 12988, and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch.
35) and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule does not constitute a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The action does not have
retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For purposes of Executive Order
13132, SBA has determined that the rule
will not have substantial, direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore,
for the purpose of Executive Order
13132, Federalism, SBA determines that
this proposed rule has no federalism
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
implications warranting preparation of a
federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch.
35
SBA has determined that this
proposed rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C., Chapter 35.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
5 U.S.C. 601, requires administrative
agencies to consider the effect of their
actions on small entities, small nonprofit enterprises, and small local
governments. Pursuant to the RFA,
when an agency issues a rulemaking,
the agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis which describes the
impact of the rule on small entities.
However, section 605 of the RFA allows
an agency to certify a rule, in lieu of
preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking
is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. There are
approximately one dozen Sureties that
participate in the SBA program, and no
part of this proposed rule would impose
any significant additional cost or burden
on them. Consequently, this rule does
not meet the substantial number of
small businesses criterion anticipated
by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 115
Claims, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses, Surety
bonds.
For the reasons cited above, the Small
Business Administration proposes to
amend 13 CFR part 115 as follows:
PART 115—SURETY BOND
GUARANTEE
1. The authority citation for part 115
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. app 3; 15 U.S.C. 687b,
687c, 694a, 694b note; and Pub. L. 110–246,
Sec. 12079, 122 Stat. 1651.
2. In § 115.10, revise the definition of
‘‘Applicable Statutory Limit’’ to read as
follows:
■
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 115.10
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Applicable Statutory Limit means the
maximum amount, set forth below, of
any Contract or Order for which SBA is
authorized to guarantee, or commit to
guarantee, a Bid Bond, Payment Bond,
Performance Bond, or Ancillary Bond:
(1) $6.5 million (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1908);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2) $10 million if a contracting officer
of a Federal agency certifies, in
accordance with section 115.12(e)(3),
that such guarantee is necessary; or
(3) if SBA is guaranteeing the bond in
connection with a procurement related
to a major disaster pursuant to section
12079 of Public Law 110–246, see
section 115.12(e)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 115.12 as follows:
■ (a) Revise paragraph (b) to read as set
forth below;
■ (b) Remove paragraph (e)(3);
■ (c) Redesignate paragraph (e)(4) as
paragraph (e)(3);
■ (d) In redesignated paragraph (e)(3),
revise the heading and first sentence as
set forth below;
(e) Redesignate paragraph (e)(5) as
paragraph (e)(4) and revise the heading
and introductory paragraph as set forth
below;
(f) In redesignated paragraph (e)(4),
remove paragraph (B)(iii) and
redesignate paragraph (B)(iv) as
paragraph (B)(iii).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 115.12 General program policies and
provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Eligibility of bonds. Bid Bonds and
Final Bonds are eligible for an SBA
guarantee if they are executed in
connection with an eligible Contract, as
defined in § 115.10, Definitions.
Commercial and Fidelity bonds are not
eligible for SBA guarantees. Ancillary
Bonds may also be eligible for SBA’s
guarantee. A performance bond must
not prohibit a Surety from performing
the Contract upon default of the
Principal. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) Federal Contracts or Orders in
excess of $6,500,000 (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with section
1908 of title 41, United States Code).
SBA is authorized to guarantee bonds
on Federal Contracts or Orders greater
than $6,500,000 (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1908), but not exceeding $10,000,000,
upon a signed certification of a Federal
contracting officer. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Alternative authority to guarantee
bonds for Contracts and Orders related
to a major disaster area. Subject to the
availability of funds appropriated in
advance specifically for the purpose of
guaranteeing bonds for any Contract or
Order related to a major disaster, SBA
may, as an alternative to the authority
otherwise set forth in this Part,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46531
guarantee bonds on any Contract or
Order under the following terms and
conditions:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 115.13 paragraph (a)(5) by
revising the second sentence and adding
a third sentence to read as follows:
§ 115.13
Eligibility of Principal
(a) * * *
(5) * * * SBA will not guarantee
bonds for Principals who are primarily
brokers. In addition, the Principal must
retain full responsibility for the
oversight and management of the
Contract, including any work performed
by any subcontractor, and may not
subcontract the full scope of the
statement of work.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 115.17 paragraph (b)(2) by
removing ‘‘90 days’’ and adding ‘‘45
days’’ in its place.
■ 6. Amend § 115.19 as follows:
■ (a) Revise the introductory paragraph
as set forth below;
■ (b) Remove ‘‘$50,000’’ wherever it
appears in paragraphs (c)(1), (d), and
(e)(2) and add in its place ‘‘$100,000,
whichever is less.’’
§ 115.19
Denial of liability.
In addition to equitable and legal
defenses and remedies under contract
law, the Act, and the regulations in this
part, SBA is relieved of liability in
whole or in part within its discretion if
any of the circumstances in paragraphs
(a) through (h) of this section exist,
except that SBA shall not deny liability
on Prior Approval bonds based solely
upon material information that was
provided as part of the guarantee
application.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 115.30 as follows:
■ (a) In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(C), remove
the phrase ‘‘or the warranty/
maintenance period’’;
■ (b) In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(D), remove
‘‘$250’’ and add ‘‘$1,000’’ in its place.
■ 8. Amend § 115.31 by revising the
final sentence of paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
§ 115.31
Guarantee Percentage.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * * For example, if a contract
amount increases to $6,800,000, SBA’s
share of the loss under an 80%
guarantee is limited to 76.5%
[6,500,000/6,800,000 = 95.6% × 80% =
76.5%].
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 115.32 paragraph (d) by
removing ‘‘$50,000’’ and adding
‘‘$100,000, whichever is less’’ in its
place.
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
46532
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Proposed Rules
10. Amend § 115.35 as follows:
(a) Revise paragraph (c)(1) as set forth
below;
■ (b) In paragraph (c)(4), remove ‘‘90
days’’ and add ‘‘45 days’’ in its place.
■
■
§ 115.35
Losses.
Claims for reimbursement of
*
*
*
*
(c) Claim reimbursement requests. (1)
Claims for reimbursement for Losses
which the Surety has paid must be
submitted (together with a copy of the
bond, the bonded Contract, and any
indemnity agreements) with the initial
claim to OSG on a ‘‘Default Report,
Claim for Reimbursement and Report of
Recoveries’’ (SBA Form 994H), within
90 days from the time of each
disbursement. Claims submitted after 90
days must be accompanied by
substantiation satisfactory to SBA. The
date of the claim for reimbursement is
the date of receipt of the claim by SBA,
or such later date as additional
information requested by SBA is
received.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Amend § 115.36 paragraph (a)(3)
by removing ‘‘90 days’’ and adding ‘‘45
days’’ in its place.
■ 12. Amend § 115.67 paragraph (a) by
removing ‘‘$50,000’’ and adding
‘‘$100,000, whichever is less’’ in its
place.
■ 13. Revise § 115.69 to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Dated: July 26, 2013.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–18530 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am]
*
§ 115.69
(b) Remove the term ‘‘90 days’’ in the
third sentence and add ‘‘45 days’’ in its
place.
■
Imminent Breach.
(a) No Prior Approval Requirement.
SBA will reimburse a PSB Surety for the
guaranteed portion of payments the
Surety makes to avoid or attempt to
avoid an Imminent Breach of the terms
of a Contract covered by an SBA
guaranteed bond. The aggregate of the
payments by SBA under this section
cannot exceed 10% of the Contract
amount, unless the Administrator finds
that a greater payment (not to exceed the
guaranteed portion of the bond penalty)
is necessary and reasonable. The PSB
Surety does not need to obtain prior
SBA approval to make Imminent Breach
payments, except that the PSB Surety
may request SBA to approve payments
that exceed 10% of the Contract amount
prior to the Surety making the payment.
In no event will SBA make any
duplicate payment under any provision
of these regulations in this part.
(b) Recordkeeping Requirement. The
PSB Surety must keep records of
payments made to avoid Imminent
Breach.
■ 14. Amend § 115.70 paragraph (a) as
follows:
■ (a) Remove the term ‘‘1 year’’ in the
first sentence and add the term ‘‘90
days’’ in its place; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0616; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–353–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
We are revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for all The Boeing Company Model 767
airplanes. That NPRM proposed to
require repetitive operational tests of the
engine fuel suction feed of the fuel
system, and other related testing if
necessary. That NPRM was prompted by
reports of two in-service occurrences on
Model 737–400 airplanes of total loss of
boost pump pressure of the fuel feed
system, followed by loss of fuel system
suction feed capability on one engine,
and in-flight shutdown of the engine.
This action revises that NPRM by
proposing to revise the maintenance
program to incorporate a revision to the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of
the maintenance planning data (MPD)
document, and to remove airplanes from
the applicability. We are proposing this
supplemental NPRM to detect and
correct failure of the engine fuel suction
feed capability of the fuel system, which
could result in dual engine flameout,
inability to restart the engines, and
consequent forced landing of the
airplane. Since these actions impose an
additional burden over that proposed in
the previous NPRM, we are reopening
the comment period to allow the public
the chance to comment on these
proposed changes.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by September
16, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5280; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue
Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Branch, ANM–140S, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3352;
phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0616; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–353–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46528-46532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18530]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 46528]]
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 115
RIN 3245-AG56
Surety Bond Guarantee Program
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would conform the regulations governing the
Surety Bond Guarantee Program to certain provisions of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (NDAA), including the
provisions that increase the contract amounts for which SBA is
authorized to guarantee bonds, grant SBA the authority to partially
deny liability under its bond guarantee, and prohibit SBA from denying
liability based on material information that was provided as part of
the guarantee application in the Prior Approval Program. In addition,
changes are proposed with respect to the Quick Bond Guarantee
Application and Agreement, the timeframes for taking certain actions
related to claims, the dollar threshold for determining when a change
in the Contract or bond amounts meets certain criteria or requires
certain action, and the elimination of references to the provisions of
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) that
have expired.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3245-AG56, by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Surety Guarantees, Suite 8600, 409 Third
Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of Surety Guarantees, 409
Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please submit the information to Office
of Surety Guarantees, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416 or
send an email to the Office of Surety Guarantees. Highlight the
information that you consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA
should hold this information as confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final determination whether it will publish
the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara J. Brannan, Office of Surety
Guarantees, 202-205-6545, email: Barbara.brannan@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) guarantees bid,
payment and performance bonds for small and emerging contractors who
cannot obtain surety bonds through regular commercial channels. SBA's
guarantee gives Sureties an incentive to provide bonding for small
businesses and, thereby, assists small businesses in obtaining greater
access to contracting opportunities. SBA's guarantee is an agreement
between a Surety and SBA that SBA will assume a certain percentage of
the Surety's loss should a contractor default on the underlying
contract. This proposed rule would make the following changes to the
program:
A. Conform Regulations to NDAA
This proposed rule would conform the regulations governing the
Surety Bond Guarantee Program to the following changes enacted by the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, Public Law
112-239, 126 Stat. 1632:
(1) Increasing the contract amount for which SBA is authorized to
guarantee bonds from $2 million to $6.5 million (as adjusted for
inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908);
(2) increasing the contract amount for which SBA is authorized to
guarantee bonds to $10 million with a Federal contracting officer's
certification that the guarantee is necessary for the small business to
obtain bonding;
(3) authorizing SBA to deny liability under its bond guarantee in
whole or in part within its discretion; and
(4) prohibiting SBA from denying liability based on material
information that was provided as part of the guarantee application in
the Prior Approval Program.
B. Partial Subcontract
The existing regulation, 13 CFR 115.13(a)(5), states that SBA will
not guarantee bonds for Principals ``who are primarily brokers or who
have effectively transferred control over the project to one or more
subcontractors.'' Surety companies and agents have questioned the
meaning of the phrase ``effectively transferred control over the
project'', and SBA agrees that clearer guidance is needed to determine
when the use of subcontractors becomes objectionable. SBA recognizes
that many small general contractors may subcontract a high percentage
of the work under a contract, and this is not necessarily
objectionable. However, SBA does not want the subcontracting to result
in the Principal--the Person primarily liable to complete the
Contract--losing control over the project. In the most egregious cases,
the Principal may be acting as a front for the subcontractor. This
objectionable activity may not be discernible solely from the
percentage of work subcontracted on a project. Although that is often a
good indicator, SBA believes that control is also a function of who has
responsibility for overseeing and managing the work performed under the
Contract. Accordingly, SBA is proposing to revise the second sentence
of this provision to clarify that, to be eligible for a bond guaranteed
by SBA, the Principal must retain full responsibility for the oversight
and management of the Contract, including any work performed by any
subcontractor, and may not subcontract the full scope of the statement
of work.
C. Quick Bond
The proposed rule would revise the regulations governing the Quick
Bond Guarantee Application and Agreement. Under 13 CFR
115.30(d)(2)(ii)(C), the Quick Bond Application and Agreement (SBA Form
990A) may not be used for any contract that includes a warranty/
maintenance period exceeding 12 months. However, the definition of
Contract in 13 CFR 115.10 allows for the Contract to include a
maintenance agreement of 2 years or less (for
[[Page 46529]]
defective workmanship or materials only), and also allows, with SBA's
written approval, for longer maintenance agreements and broader
coverage. SBA has reassessed the need for this exclusion, and is
proposing to delete the 12 month warranty/maintenance exclusion from 13
CFR 115.30(d)(2)(ii)(C).
In addition, under 13 CFR 115.30(d)(2)(ii)(D), SBA Form 990A may
not be used if the contract includes a provision for liquidated damages
that exceed $250 per day. The proposed rule would increase to $1,000
per day the amount of liquidated damages subject to the exclusion. SBA
received suggestions from the surety industry for this increase, which
is consistent with industry standards for a streamlined application
process.
By making the above changes, the Agency hopes to encourage greater
use of the Quick Bond Guarantee Application and Agreement.
D. Increasing Certain Dollar Thresholds
The rule proposes to amend the following provisions to change the
dollar threshold for determining when a change in the Contract or bond
amounts may result in denial of liability or requires certain action.
Currently, these provisions provide that the thresholds are met when
the Contract or bond amount changes by 25% or $50,000, whichever is
less. This formula means that the $50,000 threshold is always the
lesser amount for contracts that are greater than $200,000, and the
average amount of a Contract is now approximately twice this amount, or
$400,000. In addition, for some of the provisions, the $50,000
threshold has not changed since 1989. Further, SBA would expect the
average contract amount to increase with the recent increase in the
maximum contract amount to $6.5 million. Thus, SBA is proposing to
update the dollar threshold to $100,000 for the following provisions:
(1) Under 13 CFR 115.19(c)(1), SBA is relieved of liability if the
Surety has committed a material breach of one or more terms or
conditions of its agreement with SBA. A material breach is considered
to have occurred if such breach (or such breaches in the aggregate)
causes an increase in the Contract amount or in the bond amount of at
least 25% or $50,000. The proposed rule would increase the dollar
threshold to $100,000.
(2) Under 13 CFR 115.19(d), SBA is relieved of liability if the
Surety has committed a substantial violation of SBA regulations, which
is defined in part as a violation which causes an increase in the bond
amount of at least 25% or $50,000 in the aggregate. The proposed rule
would increase the dollar threshold to $100,000.
(3) Under 13 CFR 115.19(e)(2), SBA is relieved of liability if the
Surety agrees to or acquiesces in any material alteration in the terms,
conditions, or provisions of the bond. For a Prior Approval Surety,
such alteration includes any increase in the bond amount of at least
25% or $50,000. The proposed rule would increase the dollar threshold
to $100,000.
(4) Under 13 CFR 115.32(d), a Prior Approval Surety must notify SBA
of any increases or decreases in the Contract or bond amount that
aggregate 25% or $50,000 as soon as the Surety acquires knowledge of
the change, and also must obtain SBA's prior written approval of an
increase in the original bond amount as a result of a single change
order of at least 25% or $50,000. The proposed rule would increase
these dollar thresholds to $100,000.
(5) Under 13 CFR 115.67(a), a PSB Surety must pay the additional
fees due from the Principal and the Surety on increases aggregating 25%
of the contract or bond amount or $50,000. The proposed rule would
increase the dollar threshold to $100,000.
E. Reducing Certain Timeframes
With the wide-spread use of electronic processing of claims and
payments, SBA believes that the timeframes for taking the following
actions could be reduced:
(1) Under 13 CFR 115.17(b), the Surety is required to pursue all
possible sources of salvage and recovery, and SBA is entitled to its
guaranteed percentage of all salvage and recovery. Currently, 13 CFR
115.17(b)(2) requires the Surety to reimburse or credit SBA with its
share within 90 days of receipt of any recovery by the Surety; the
proposed rule would reduce this timeframe to 45 days. Similarly, the
proposed rule would reduce the timeframe for the Surety to pay SBA its
share of any settlement amount under 13 CFR 115.36(a)(3) from 90 days
to 45 days.
(2) Under 13 CFR 115.35(c)(4) and 115.70(a), SBA pays its share of
the loss to both the Prior Approval Surety and the PSB Surety within 90
days of receipt of the requisite information. The proposed rule would
reduce this timeframe to 45 days.
In addition, under 13 CFR 115.35(c)(1) and 115.70(a), both the
Prior Approval Surety and the PSB Surety must submit to SBA a claim for
reimbursement for losses paid by the Surety within 1 year from the time
of each disbursement. The proposed rule would reduce this timeframe to
90 days. This reduction would facilitate SBA's ability to review and
verify the claim without unnecessary delay.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 115.10. SBA is proposing to revise the definition of
``Applicable Statutory Limit'' to include the maximum amounts of any
Contract or Order for which SBA is authorized by the NDAA to guarantee,
or commit to guarantee, a Bid Bond, Payment Bond, Performance Bond, or
Ancillary Bond. The statutory limits set by the NDAA are: (1) $6.5
million (as adjusted for inflation in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908);
and (2) $10 million if a contracting officer of a Federal agency
certifies that such guarantee is necessary. In addition, SBA is
proposing to include a reference in the definition to the maximum
amounts of any Contract or Order when SBA guarantees the bond in
connection with a procurement related to a major disaster pursuant to
section 12079 of Public Law 110-246. Under this provision, which was
enacted on June 18, 2008, the maximum amounts are (1) $5 million, and
(2) $10 million on Federal Contracts or Orders at the request of the
Head of any Federal agency involved in reconstruction efforts in
response to a major disaster. The authority to guarantee bonds under
this provision is subject to the availability of funds appropriated in
advance specifically for the purpose of guaranteeing bonds for any
Contract or Order related to a major disaster. SBA does not expect this
authority to be often used, given NDAA's increase in the maximum
amounts for any Contract or Order up to $6.5 million (and $10 million
if a Federal contracting officer certifies that such guarantee is
necessary) and the requirement that funds be appropriated in advance
specifically for guaranteeing bonds related to a major disaster.
Section 115.12(b). SBA is proposing to delete the reference to the
``Contract Bonds'' section of the current ``Manual of Rules, Procedures
and Classifications of the Surety Association of America'', and to
replace this reference with two specific types of bonds, Commercial and
Fidelity bonds, that are not eligible for an SBA guarantee.
Section 115.12(e)(3). SBA is proposing to delete this provision in
its entirety, as it relates to requirements imposed by the Recovery Act
that expired on September 30, 2010.
Section 115.12(e)(4). SBA is proposing to renumber this provision
as (e)(3), and to revise this provision to reflect the authority to
guarantee bonds on Federal Contracts or Orders greater
[[Page 46530]]
than $6.5 million, but not exceeding $10 million, upon a signed
certification of a Federal contracting officer.
Section 115.12(e)(5). SBA is proposing to renumber this provision
as (e)(4), to revise the introductory paragraph to clarify that this
paragraph implements an alternative statutory authority for
guaranteeing bonds for procurements related to a major disaster, and to
delete paragraph (B)(iii) of this provision, as it relates to
requirements imposed by the Recovery Act that expired on September 30,
2010.
Section 115.13(a)(5). SBA is proposing to revise this provision to
clarify that, to be eligible for a bond guaranteed by SBA, the
Principal must retain full responsibility for the oversight and
management of the Contract, including any work performed by any
subcontractor, and may not subcontract the full scope of the statement
of work.
Section 115.17(b)(2). SBA is proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a Surety to reimburse or credit SBA for salvage and
recovery from 90 days to 45 days after the Surety receives any salvage
and recovery.
Section 115.19. SBA is proposing to revise the introductory
paragraph of this provision to conform it to current law by deleting
the time frame reference required by the Recovery Act, which has
expired, and by inserting the relevant requirements of the NDAA,
including the authority of SBA to deny liability, in whole or in part,
within its discretion if any of the circumstances in paragraphs (a)
through (h) of this section exist, and the prohibition on denying
liability based on material information that was provided as part of
the guarantee application in the Prior Approval Program. SBA is also
proposing to amend section 115.19(c)(1) by increasing the dollar
threshold for determining whether the Surety has committed a material
breach of one or more terms or conditions of its Prior Approval or PSB
Agreement from $50,000 to $100,000. In addition, SBA is proposing to
amend section 115.19(d) by increasing the dollar threshold for
determining whether the Surety has committed a substantial violation of
SBA regulations from $50,000 to $100,000, and proposing to amend
section 115.19(e)(2) by increasing the dollar threshold for determining
whether a Prior Approval Surety has agreed to or acquiesced in any
material alternation in the terms, conditions, or provisions of the
bond from $50,000 to $100,000. In each of these sections, the phrase
``whichever is less'' is being added after the $100,000 to clarify the
meaning of this requirement.
Section 115.30(d)(2). Under the current 13 CFR 115.30(d)(2)(ii)(C),
the Quick Bond Application and Agreement (SBA Form 990A) may not be
used for any contract where the time for completion of the Contract or
the warranty/maintenance period exceeds 12 months. SBA is proposing to
delete the phrase ``or the warranty/maintenance period'' from this
provision. In addition, under current 115.30(d)(2)(ii)(D), SBA Form
990A may not be used for any contract that includes a provision for
liquidated damages that exceed $250 per day. SBA is proposing to
increase the allowable liquidated damages provision from $250.00 per
day to $1,000.00 per day.
Section 115.31(d). SBA is proposing to revise the final sentence of
this provision by basing the example on the current statutory limit of
$6.5 million.
Section 115.32(d). SBA is proposing to amend this provision by
changing the dollar threshold for determining when the Prior Approval
Surety must notify SBA of the change and/or obtain SBA's approval from
at least $50,000 to $100,000. The phrase ``whichever is less'' is being
added to clarify the meaning of this requirement.
Section 115.35(c)(1). SBA is proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a Prior Approval Surety to submit a claim to SBA from one
year to 90 days after the Surety pays the claim. In addition, the title
of the SBA Form 994H, ``Default Report, Claim for Reimbursement and
Record of Administrative Action,'' is being changed to ``Default
Report, Claim for Reimbursement and Report of Recoveries,'' to reflect
the current version of the form. This form is used to process
recoveries, and adding ``Recoveries'' to the title of the form promotes
its proper use.
Section 115.35(c)(4). SBA is proposing to reduce the time frame for
SBA to pay a claim submitted by a Surety in the Prior Approval Program
from 90 days to 45 days after receipt of the requisite information.
Section 115.36(a)(3). SBA is proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a Surety to reimburse SBA its share of a settlement from 90
days to 45 days after receipt.
Section 115.67(a). SBA is proposing to increase the dollar
threshold for determining when a PSB Surety must present checks for
additional fees due from the Principal and the Surety from $50,000 to
$100,000. The phrase ``whichever is less'' is being added to clarify
the meaning of this requirement.
Section 115.69. This provision currently provides that SBA will
reimburse a PSB Surety for the guaranteed portion of payments the
Surety makes to avoid or attempt to avoid an Imminent Breach of the
terms of a Contract, and that the PSB Surety does not need SBA approval
to make Imminent Breach payments. It also provides that the aggregate
of the payments by SBA cannot exceed 10% of the Contract amount, unless
SBA finds that a greater payment is necessary and reasonable. For
payments that exceed 10% of the Contract amount, SBA is proposing to
revise this provision to give the PSB Surety the opportunity to request
SBA to approve the amount prior to the Surety making the Imminent
Breach payment. SBA will approve such payment if SBA finds that the
payment is necessary and reasonable. If the Surety does not request
prior SBA approval for such payments, SBA may refuse to reimburse the
Surety if SBA finds that the payment that exceeds 10% of the Contract
amount was not necessary and reasonable.
Section 115.70(a). SBA is proposing to reduce the time frame
allowed for a PSB Surety to submit a claim to SBA from one year to 90
days after the Surety pays the claim. SBA is also proposing to reduce
the time frame for SBA to pay a claim submitted by a Surety in the PSB
Program from 90 days to 45 days after receipt of the requisite
information. Compliance with Executive Orders 12866, 12988, and 13132,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35) and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule does not constitute a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For purposes of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that the
rule will not have substantial, direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. Therefore, for the purpose of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, SBA determines that this proposed rule has no federalism
[[Page 46531]]
implications warranting preparation of a federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35
SBA has determined that this proposed rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 5 U.S.C. 601, requires
administrative agencies to consider the effect of their actions on
small entities, small non-profit enterprises, and small local
governments. Pursuant to the RFA, when an agency issues a rulemaking,
the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis which
describes the impact of the rule on small entities. However, section
605 of the RFA allows an agency to certify a rule, in lieu of preparing
an analysis, if the rulemaking is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. There are
approximately one dozen Sureties that participate in the SBA program,
and no part of this proposed rule would impose any significant
additional cost or burden on them. Consequently, this rule does not
meet the substantial number of small businesses criterion anticipated
by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 115
Claims, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses,
Surety bonds.
For the reasons cited above, the Small Business Administration
proposes to amend 13 CFR part 115 as follows:
PART 115--SURETY BOND GUARANTEE
0
1. The authority citation for part 115 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. app 3; 15 U.S.C. 687b, 687c, 694a, 694b
note; and Pub. L. 110-246, Sec. 12079, 122 Stat. 1651.
0
2. In Sec. 115.10, revise the definition of ``Applicable Statutory
Limit'' to read as follows:
Sec. 115.10 Definitions.
* * * * *
Applicable Statutory Limit means the maximum amount, set forth
below, of any Contract or Order for which SBA is authorized to
guarantee, or commit to guarantee, a Bid Bond, Payment Bond,
Performance Bond, or Ancillary Bond:
(1) $6.5 million (as adjusted for inflation in accordance with 41
U.S.C. 1908);
(2) $10 million if a contracting officer of a Federal agency
certifies, in accordance with section 115.12(e)(3), that such guarantee
is necessary; or
(3) if SBA is guaranteeing the bond in connection with a
procurement related to a major disaster pursuant to section 12079 of
Public Law 110-246, see section 115.12(e)(4).
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 115.12 as follows:
0
(a) Revise paragraph (b) to read as set forth below;
0
(b) Remove paragraph (e)(3);
0
(c) Redesignate paragraph (e)(4) as paragraph (e)(3);
0
(d) In redesignated paragraph (e)(3), revise the heading and first
sentence as set forth below;
(e) Redesignate paragraph (e)(5) as paragraph (e)(4) and revise the
heading and introductory paragraph as set forth below;
(f) In redesignated paragraph (e)(4), remove paragraph (B)(iii) and
redesignate paragraph (B)(iv) as paragraph (B)(iii).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 115.12 General program policies and provisions.
* * * * *
(b) Eligibility of bonds. Bid Bonds and Final Bonds are eligible
for an SBA guarantee if they are executed in connection with an
eligible Contract, as defined in Sec. 115.10, Definitions. Commercial
and Fidelity bonds are not eligible for SBA guarantees. Ancillary Bonds
may also be eligible for SBA's guarantee. A performance bond must not
prohibit a Surety from performing the Contract upon default of the
Principal. * * *
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) Federal Contracts or Orders in excess of $6,500,000 (as
adjusted for inflation in accordance with section 1908 of title 41,
United States Code). SBA is authorized to guarantee bonds on Federal
Contracts or Orders greater than $6,500,000 (as adjusted for inflation
in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908), but not exceeding $10,000,000, upon
a signed certification of a Federal contracting officer. * * *
* * * * *
(4) Alternative authority to guarantee bonds for Contracts and
Orders related to a major disaster area. Subject to the availability of
funds appropriated in advance specifically for the purpose of
guaranteeing bonds for any Contract or Order related to a major
disaster, SBA may, as an alternative to the authority otherwise set
forth in this Part, guarantee bonds on any Contract or Order under the
following terms and conditions:
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 115.13 paragraph (a)(5) by revising the second sentence
and adding a third sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 115.13 Eligibility of Principal
(a) * * *
(5) * * * SBA will not guarantee bonds for Principals who are
primarily brokers. In addition, the Principal must retain full
responsibility for the oversight and management of the Contract,
including any work performed by any subcontractor, and may not
subcontract the full scope of the statement of work.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 115.17 paragraph (b)(2) by removing ``90 days'' and
adding ``45 days'' in its place.
0
6. Amend Sec. 115.19 as follows:
0
(a) Revise the introductory paragraph as set forth below;
0
(b) Remove ``$50,000'' wherever it appears in paragraphs (c)(1), (d),
and (e)(2) and add in its place ``$100,000, whichever is less.''
Sec. 115.19 Denial of liability.
In addition to equitable and legal defenses and remedies under
contract law, the Act, and the regulations in this part, SBA is
relieved of liability in whole or in part within its discretion if any
of the circumstances in paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section
exist, except that SBA shall not deny liability on Prior Approval bonds
based solely upon material information that was provided as part of the
guarantee application.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 115.30 as follows:
0
(a) In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(C), remove the phrase ``or the warranty/
maintenance period'';
0
(b) In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(D), remove ``$250'' and add ``$1,000'' in
its place.
0
8. Amend Sec. 115.31 by revising the final sentence of paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
Sec. 115.31 Guarantee Percentage.
* * * * *
(d) * * * For example, if a contract amount increases to
$6,800,000, SBA's share of the loss under an 80% guarantee is limited
to 76.5% [6,500,000/6,800,000 = 95.6% x 80% = 76.5%].
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 115.32 paragraph (d) by removing ``$50,000'' and adding
``$100,000, whichever is less'' in its place.
[[Page 46532]]
0
10. Amend Sec. 115.35 as follows:
0
(a) Revise paragraph (c)(1) as set forth below;
0
(b) In paragraph (c)(4), remove ``90 days'' and add ``45 days'' in its
place.
Sec. 115.35 Claims for reimbursement of Losses.
* * * * *
(c) Claim reimbursement requests. (1) Claims for reimbursement for
Losses which the Surety has paid must be submitted (together with a
copy of the bond, the bonded Contract, and any indemnity agreements)
with the initial claim to OSG on a ``Default Report, Claim for
Reimbursement and Report of Recoveries'' (SBA Form 994H), within 90
days from the time of each disbursement. Claims submitted after 90 days
must be accompanied by substantiation satisfactory to SBA. The date of
the claim for reimbursement is the date of receipt of the claim by SBA,
or such later date as additional information requested by SBA is
received.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec. 115.36 paragraph (a)(3) by removing ``90 days'' and
adding ``45 days'' in its place.
0
12. Amend Sec. 115.67 paragraph (a) by removing ``$50,000'' and adding
``$100,000, whichever is less'' in its place.
0
13. Revise Sec. 115.69 to read as follows:
Sec. 115.69 Imminent Breach.
(a) No Prior Approval Requirement. SBA will reimburse a PSB Surety
for the guaranteed portion of payments the Surety makes to avoid or
attempt to avoid an Imminent Breach of the terms of a Contract covered
by an SBA guaranteed bond. The aggregate of the payments by SBA under
this section cannot exceed 10% of the Contract amount, unless the
Administrator finds that a greater payment (not to exceed the
guaranteed portion of the bond penalty) is necessary and reasonable.
The PSB Surety does not need to obtain prior SBA approval to make
Imminent Breach payments, except that the PSB Surety may request SBA to
approve payments that exceed 10% of the Contract amount prior to the
Surety making the payment. In no event will SBA make any duplicate
payment under any provision of these regulations in this part.
(b) Recordkeeping Requirement. The PSB Surety must keep records of
payments made to avoid Imminent Breach.
0
14. Amend Sec. 115.70 paragraph (a) as follows:
0
(a) Remove the term ``1 year'' in the first sentence and add the term
``90 days'' in its place; and
0
(b) Remove the term ``90 days'' in the third sentence and add ``45
days'' in its place.
Dated: July 26, 2013.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-18530 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P