Application Procedures, Execution and Filing of Forms: Correction of State Office Address for Filings and Recordings, Including Proper Offices for Recording of Mining Claims; New Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas, 46525-46527 [2013-18523]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq, as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 30,
2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See Clean Air Act section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 16, 2013.
Judith Wong,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
PART 52 [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46525
Subpart G—Colorado
2. Section 52.349 is amended by
adding paragraph (o) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.349 Control strategy: Carbon
monoxide.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Revisions to the Colorado State
Implementation Plan, revised Carbon
Monoxide Maintenance Plan for
Colorado Springs, as adopted by the
Colorado Air Quality Control
Commission on December 17, 2009 and
submitted by the Governor’s designee
on March 31, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2013–18438 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 1820
[LLNM910000–L102000000.PH0000]
RIN 1004–AE33
Application Procedures, Execution and
Filing of Forms: Correction of State
Office Address for Filings and
Recordings, Including Proper Offices
for Recording of Mining Claims; New
Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
regulations pertaining to execution and
filing of forms in order to reflect the
new address of the New Mexico/
Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office of
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
All filings and other documents relating
to public lands in the States of New
Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas
must be filed at the new address of the
State Office.
DATES: This rule is effective August 1,
2013.
SUMMARY:
You may send inquiries or
suggestions to the Chief, Office of
Communications (912), Bureau of Land
Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe,
NM 87502–0115.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Hummel, 505–954–2018. Persons
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week, to leave a message for Ms.
Hummel.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
46526
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
II. Procedural Matters
I. Background
This final rule reflects the
administrative action of changing the
street address of the New Mexico/
Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office of
the BLM. Both the postal mailing
address (P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, NM
87502–0115) and the phone number
(505–954–2000) remain the same. This
rule changes the street address for the
personal filing of documents relating to
public lands in New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Texas, and Kansas, but makes no other
changes in filing requirements. The
BLM has determined that the rule has
no substantive impact on the public,
imposes no costs, and merely updates a
list of addresses included in the Code of
Federal Regulations for the convenience
of the public. The Department of the
Interior, therefore, for good cause finds
that under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
553(d)(3) notice and public comment
procedures are unnecessary and that the
rule may take effect immediately.
II. Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This final rule is an administrative
action to change the address for one
BLM State Office. This rule was not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. The rule
imposes no costs, and merely updates a
list of addresses included in the Code of
Federal Regulations for the convenience
of the public.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has found that the final rule
is of a procedural nature and thus is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under Section
102(2)(C) of the Environmental
Protection Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), pursuant to 43 CFR
46.210(i). In addition, the final rule does
not present any of the 12 extraordinary
circumstances listed at 43 CFR 46.215.
Pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR 1508.4) and the environmental
regulations, policies, and procedures of
the Department of the Interior, the term
‘‘categorical exclusions’’ means a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment and that have been found
to have no such effect in procedures
adopted by a Federal agency and for
which neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq.) to ensure that Government
regulations do not unnecessarily or
disproportionately burden small
entities. This final rule is a purely
administrative regulatory action having
no effect upon the public or the
environment and it has been determined
that the rule will not have a significant
effect on the economy or small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This final rule is a purely
administrative regulatory action having
no effects upon the public or the
economy. This is not a major rule under
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2)). The rule will not have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. The rule will not cause
a major increase in costs of prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. The
rule will not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to complete with foreignbased enterprises.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act
The BLM has determined that this
final rule is not significant under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
because the rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. Further, the final rule
will not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. It does not require
action by any non-Federal government
entity. Therefore, the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), is not
required.
Executive Order 12630, Government
Action and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
As required by Executive Order
12630, the Department of the Interior
has determined that the rule would not
cause a taking of private property. No
private property rights would be
affected by a rule that merely reports an
address change for the New Mexico/
Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office.
The Department therefore certifies that
this final rule does not represent a
governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally
protected property rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the BLM finds that the rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. The final rule does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
governments and the States, or the
distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This final rule
does not preempt State law.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This final rule is a purely
administrative regulatory action having
no effects upon the public and will not
unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of the Executive Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the Executive
Order 13175, the BLM finds that the
rule does not include policies that have
tribal implications. This final rule is
purely an administrative action having
no effects upon the public or the
environment, imposing no costs, and
merely updating the BLM, New Mexico/
Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office
address included in the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
In accordance with Executive Order
13211, the BLM has determined that the
final rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the energy supply,
distribution or use, including a shortfall
in supply or price increase. This final
rule is a purely administrative action
and has no implications under
Executive Order 13211.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the rule does not
contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 1820
Administrative practice and
procedure, Archives and records, Public
lands.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 22, 2013.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and
Minerals Management.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 43 U.S.C. 2, 1201,
1733, and 1740.
PART 1820—APPLICATION
PROCEDURES
STATE OFFICES AND AREAS OF
JURISDICTION
Subpart 1821—General Information
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Bureau of Land
Management amends 43 CFR part 1820
as follows:
*
2. Amend § 1821.10 in paragraph (a)
by removing the entry for New Mexico
and adding in its place an entry for New
Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas to read
as follows:
■
§ 1821.10
1. The authority citation for part 1820
continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
46527
PO 00000
Where are BLM offices located?
*
*
*
*
New Mexico State Office, 310
Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508,
P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico
87502–0115—Kansas, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–18523 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P
(a) * * *
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46525-46527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18523]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 1820
[LLNM910000-L102000000.PH0000]
RIN 1004-AE33
Application Procedures, Execution and Filing of Forms: Correction
of State Office Address for Filings and Recordings, Including Proper
Offices for Recording of Mining Claims; New Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/
Kansas
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the regulations pertaining to execution
and filing of forms in order to reflect the new address of the New
Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office of the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM). All filings and other documents relating to public
lands in the States of New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas must be
filed at the new address of the State Office.
DATES: This rule is effective August 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send inquiries or suggestions to the Chief, Office
of Communications (912), Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 27115,
Santa Fe, NM 87502-0115.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Hummel, 505-954-2018. Persons
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message for Ms. Hummel.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
[[Page 46526]]
II. Procedural Matters
I. Background
This final rule reflects the administrative action of changing the
street address of the New Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office of
the BLM. Both the postal mailing address (P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, NM
87502-0115) and the phone number (505-954-2000) remain the same. This
rule changes the street address for the personal filing of documents
relating to public lands in New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas,
but makes no other changes in filing requirements. The BLM has
determined that the rule has no substantive impact on the public,
imposes no costs, and merely updates a list of addresses included in
the Code of Federal Regulations for the convenience of the public. The
Department of the Interior, therefore, for good cause finds that under
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) notice and public comment procedures
are unnecessary and that the rule may take effect immediately.
II. Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This final rule is an administrative action to change the address
for one BLM State Office. This rule was not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866. The rule
imposes no costs, and merely updates a list of addresses included in
the Code of Federal Regulations for the convenience of the public.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM has found that the final rule is of a procedural nature and
thus is categorically excluded from environmental review under Section
102(2)(C) of the Environmental Protection Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C), pursuant to 43 CFR 46.210(i). In addition, the final rule
does not present any of the 12 extraordinary circumstances listed at 43
CFR 46.215. Pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR 1508.4) and the environmental regulations,
policies, and procedures of the Department of the Interior, the term
``categorical exclusions'' means a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment and that have been found to have no such effect in
procedures adopted by a Federal agency and for which neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C.
601, et seq.) to ensure that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. This final
rule is a purely administrative regulatory action having no effect upon
the public or the environment and it has been determined that the rule
will not have a significant effect on the economy or small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This final rule is a purely administrative regulatory action having
no effects upon the public or the economy. This is not a major rule
under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2)). The rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. The rule will not cause a major increase in costs of
prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic regions. The rule will not have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based
enterprises to complete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act
The BLM has determined that this final rule is not significant
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 because the rule will
not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in
any one year. Further, the final rule will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. It does not require action by any
non-Federal government entity. Therefore, the information required by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), is not
required.
Executive Order 12630, Government Action and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
As required by Executive Order 12630, the Department of the
Interior has determined that the rule would not cause a taking of
private property. No private property rights would be affected by a
rule that merely reports an address change for the New Mexico/Oklahoma/
Texas/Kansas State Office. The Department therefore certifies that this
final rule does not represent a governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally protected property rights.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the BLM finds that the
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The final rule
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national governments and the States, or the
distribution of power and the responsibilities among the various levels
of government. This final rule does not preempt State law.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This final rule is a purely administrative regulatory action having
no effects upon the public and will not unduly burden the judicial
system and meets the requirements of Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the
Executive Order.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the Executive Order 13175, the BLM finds that
the rule does not include policies that have tribal implications. This
final rule is purely an administrative action having no effects upon
the public or the environment, imposing no costs, and merely updating
the BLM, New Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/Kansas State Office address included
in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
In accordance with Executive Order 13211, the BLM has determined
that the final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
energy supply, distribution or use, including a shortfall in supply or
price increase. This final rule is a purely administrative action and
has no implications under Executive Order 13211.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does
not contain any information collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 1820
Administrative practice and procedure, Archives and records, Public
lands.
[[Page 46527]]
Dated: July 22, 2013.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Bureau of Land
Management amends 43 CFR part 1820 as follows:
PART 1820--APPLICATION PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1820 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 43 U.S.C. 2, 1201, 1733, and 1740.
Subpart 1821--General Information
0
2. Amend Sec. 1821.10 in paragraph (a) by removing the entry for New
Mexico and adding in its place an entry for New Mexico/Oklahoma/Texas/
Kansas to read as follows:
Sec. 1821.10 Where are BLM offices located?
(a) * * *
STATE OFFICES AND AREAS OF JURISDICTION
* * * * *
New Mexico State Office, 310 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508,
P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-0115--Kansas, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-18523 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
