Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Permit Exemption Rule, 46520-46521 [2013-18417]
Download as PDF
46520
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What comments did we receive on the
proposed rule?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and executive order reviews.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2008–0402; FRL–9834–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Permit Exemption Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving revisions to
the Wisconsin State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) on April 23, 2008. WDNR
submitted revisions exempting certain
sources of air pollution from
construction permit requirements. EPA
is approving these revisions because
they are consistent with Federal
regulations governing state permit
programs.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2008–0402. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Andrea
Morgan, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–6058 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Morgan, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6058,
morgan.andrea@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
On May 15, 2013, at 78 FR 28547,
EPA proposed to approve a SIP revision
from Wisconsin exempting certain
sources of air pollution from the
requirement to obtain a construction
permit. Sources with actual emissions of
under 10 tons per year (tpy) of each
criteria pollutant, particulate matter of
10 micrometers or less, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and
volatile organic compounds, and less
than 0.5 tpy of lead, and that are not
subject to Federal air pollution
requirements for hazardous air
pollutants under section 111 or 112 of
the Clean Air Act (Act) will be eligible
for the exemption. The revisions will
also exempt construction or
modification projects that emit less than
1,666 pounds of criteria pollutants per
month, averaged over a 12 consecutive
month period, and less than 10 pounds
of lead per month, averaged over a 12
consecutive month period from
construction permitting requirements.
EPA believes that the revisions to
Wisconsin’s SIP meet Federal
requirements and will not interfere with
attainment or reasonable further
progress. As set forth in the proposed
rule, this SIP revision satisfies the antibacksliding provisions of section 110(l)
of the Act.
II. What comments did we receive on
the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period. The comment period
closed on June 14, 2013. EPA received
one comment supporting EPA’s
approval of these revisions. EPA
received no adverse comments.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Wisconsin’s April
23, 2008, SIP submittal and March 25,
2013 supplement to the submittal.
Specifically, EPA is approving the
following revisions to WDNR’s SIP: (1)
Renumber and create NR 406.02(1) and
406.04(4)(h); (2) create NR 406.04(1)(zh),
NR 406.04(1q), NR 406.04(4)(i), NR
407.03(1m), and NR 410.03(1)(f); and (3)
amend NR 410.03(1)(d). Wisconsin’s
submittal originally contained revisions
to NR 407, which pertain to operation
permit requirements. However, in the
March 25, 2013, supplement to the
submittal, Wisconsin withdrew the NR
407 revisions from the submittal.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Act, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Act; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 30, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(127) to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(127) On April 23, 2008 and March
25, 2013, the Wisconsin Department of
16:08 Jul 31, 2013
Jkt 229001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0659; FRL–9840–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Colorado; Second 10-Year Carbon
Monoxide Maintenance Plan for
Colorado Springs
EPA is taking direct final
action approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Colorado. On
March 31, 2010, the Governor of
Colorado’s designee submitted to EPA a
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(b)
second 10-year maintenance plan for the
Colorado Springs area for the carbon
monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). This
limited maintenance plan (LMP)
addresses maintenance of the CO
NAAQS for a second 10-year period
beyond the original redesignation. This
action is being taken under sections 110
and 175A of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 30, 2013 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by September 3, 2013. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
SUMMARY:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
*
[FR Doc. 2013–18417 Filed 7–31–13; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Dated: July 2, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
§ 52.2570
Natural Resources submitted a request
to revise Wisconsin’s air permitting
program to exempt certain small sources
of air pollution from construction
permitting requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Wisconsin Administrative Code,
NR 406.02 Definitions. NR 406.02(1)
‘‘Clean fuel’’, and NR 406.02(1m)
‘‘Facility’’, as published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register May
2007, No. 617, effective June 01, 2007.
(B) Wisconsin Administrative Code,
NR 406.04 Direct sources exempt from
construction permit requirements. NR
406.04(1)(zh), NR 406.04(1q), NR
406.04(4)(h), NR 406.04(4)(i), and NR
406.04(4)(j), as published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register May
2007, No. 617, effective June 01, 2007.
(C) Wisconsin Administrative Code,
NR 410.03 Application fee. NR
410.03(1)(d), and NR 410.03(1)(f), as
published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register May 2007, No.
617, effective June 1, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46521
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2011–0659, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: clark.adam@epa.gov
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air
Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director,
Air Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011–
0659. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46520-46521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18417]
[[Page 46520]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2008-0402; FRL-9834-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Permit Exemption Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources (WDNR) on April 23, 2008. WDNR submitted revisions
exempting certain sources of air pollution from construction permit
requirements. EPA is approving these revisions because they are
consistent with Federal regulations governing state permit programs.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2008-0402. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Andrea Morgan,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353-6058 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Morgan, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-6058, morgan.andrea@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and executive order reviews.
I. What is being addressed in this document?
On May 15, 2013, at 78 FR 28547, EPA proposed to approve a SIP
revision from Wisconsin exempting certain sources of air pollution from
the requirement to obtain a construction permit. Sources with actual
emissions of under 10 tons per year (tpy) of each criteria pollutant,
particulate matter of 10 micrometers or less, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen
oxides, carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds, and less than
0.5 tpy of lead, and that are not subject to Federal air pollution
requirements for hazardous air pollutants under section 111 or 112 of
the Clean Air Act (Act) will be eligible for the exemption. The
revisions will also exempt construction or modification projects that
emit less than 1,666 pounds of criteria pollutants per month, averaged
over a 12 consecutive month period, and less than 10 pounds of lead per
month, averaged over a 12 consecutive month period from construction
permitting requirements. EPA believes that the revisions to Wisconsin's
SIP meet Federal requirements and will not interfere with attainment or
reasonable further progress. As set forth in the proposed rule, this
SIP revision satisfies the anti-backsliding provisions of section
110(l) of the Act.
II. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period. The comment period
closed on June 14, 2013. EPA received one comment supporting EPA's
approval of these revisions. EPA received no adverse comments.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving Wisconsin's April 23, 2008, SIP submittal and
March 25, 2013 supplement to the submittal. Specifically, EPA is
approving the following revisions to WDNR's SIP: (1) Renumber and
create NR 406.02(1) and 406.04(4)(h); (2) create NR 406.04(1)(zh), NR
406.04(1q), NR 406.04(4)(i), NR 407.03(1m), and NR 410.03(1)(f); and
(3) amend NR 410.03(1)(d). Wisconsin's submittal originally contained
revisions to NR 407, which pertain to operation permit requirements.
However, in the March 25, 2013, supplement to the submittal, Wisconsin
withdrew the NR 407 revisions from the submittal.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
[[Page 46521]]
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 30, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 2, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(127) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(127) On April 23, 2008 and March 25, 2013, the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources submitted a request to revise
Wisconsin's air permitting program to exempt certain small sources of
air pollution from construction permitting requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 406.02 Definitions. NR
406.02(1) ``Clean fuel'', and NR 406.02(1m) ``Facility'', as published
in the Wisconsin Administrative Register May 2007, No. 617, effective
June 01, 2007.
(B) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 406.04 Direct sources exempt
from construction permit requirements. NR 406.04(1)(zh), NR 406.04(1q),
NR 406.04(4)(h), NR 406.04(4)(i), and NR 406.04(4)(j), as published in
the Wisconsin Administrative Register May 2007, No. 617, effective June
01, 2007.
(C) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 410.03 Application fee. NR
410.03(1)(d), and NR 410.03(1)(f), as published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register May 2007, No. 617, effective June 1, 2007.
[FR Doc. 2013-18417 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P