Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Primary Sampling System, 45989-45990 [2013-18247]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Notices
on December 7, 2012, and
supplemented by letters dated January
25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. The
exemption and amendment were issued
on June 19, 2013 as part of a combined
package to the licensee. (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13150A052).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day
of July 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence Burkhart,
Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2013–18246 Filed 7–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026; NRC–
2008–0252]
Vogtle Electric Generating Station,
Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear
Operating Company; Change to the
Primary Sampling System
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption and combined
license amendment: Issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is granting an
exemption to allow a departure from the
certification information of Tier 1 of the
generic design control document (DCD)
and is issuing License Amendment No.
10 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF–
91 and NPF–92. The COLs were issued
to Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., and Georgia Power
Company, Oglethorpe Power
Corporation, Municipal Electric
Authority of Georgia, and the City of
Dalton, Georgia (the licensee); for
construction and operation of the Vogtle
Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units
3 and 4, located in Burke County,
Georgia. The amendment requests to
modify the Primary Sampling System
(PSS) design, including changes to Tier
1 information located in Tables 2.2.1–2,
2.3.13–1, and 2.3.13–3, Figures 2.2.1–1
‘‘Containment System’’ and 2.3.13–1
‘‘Primary Sampling System,’’ and
Subsection 2.3.13, ‘‘Primary Sampling
System’’ of the Updated Final Safety
Analysis Report (UFSAR). The granting
of the exemption allows the changes to
Tier 1 information asked for in the
amendment. Because the acceptability
of the exemption was determined in
part by the acceptability of the
amendment, the exemption and
amendment are being issued
concurrently.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jul 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access information related to
this document, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced. The request
for the amendment and exemption were
submitted by letter dated December 7,
2012 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12346A396). The licensee
supplemented this request on January
25, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13028A267), and March 29, 2013
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13091A056).
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Minarik, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6185; email:
Anthony.Minarik@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Introduction
The NRC is granting an exemption
from Paragraph B of Section III, ‘‘Scope
and Contents,’’ of Appendix D, ‘‘Design
Certification Rule for the AP1000,’’ to
part 52 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) and issuing
License Amendment No. 10 to COLs,
NPF–91 and NPF–92, to the licensee.
The exemption is required by Paragraph
A.4 of Section VIII, ‘‘Processes for
Changes and Departures,’’ Appendix D
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45989
to 10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee
to depart from Tier 1 information. With
the requested amendment, the licensee
sought to modify the design of the
Primary Sampling System (PSS). As part
of this request, the licensee needed to
change Tier 1 information located in
Tables 2.2.1–2, 2.3.13–1, and 2.3.13–3,
Figures 2.2.1–1 ‘‘Containment System’’
and 2.3.13–1 ‘‘Primary Sampling
System,’’ and Subsection 2.3.13,
‘‘Primary Sampling System’’ of the
UFSAR. These changes were necessary
as part of a design modification which
changes the type of valve used as the air
return check valve from a check valve
to a solenoid-operated valve (SOV);
redesigns the PSS inside-containment
header; and adds a PSS containment
penetration.
Part of the justification for granting
the exemption was provided by the
review of the amendment. Because the
exemption is necessary in order to issue
the requested license amendment, the
NRC granted the exemption and issued
the amendment concurrently, rather
than in sequence. This included issuing
a combined safety evaluation containing
the NRC staff’s review of both the
exemption request and the license
amendment. The exemption met all
applicable regulatory criteria set forth in
10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section
VIII.A.4. of Appendix D to 10 CFR part
52. The license amendment was found
to be acceptable as well. The combined
safety evaluation is available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML13150A088.
Identical exemption documents
(except for referenced unit numbers and
license numbers) were issued to the
licensee for Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (COLs
NPF–91 and NPF–92). These documents
can be found in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML13150A064 and
ML13150A066. The exemption is
reproduced (with the exception of
abbreviated titles and additional
citations) in Section II of this document.
The amendment documents for COLs
NPF–91 and NPF–92 are available in
ADAMS under Accession Nos.
ML13150A070 and ML13150A077. A
summary of the amendment documents
is provided in Section III of this
document.
II. Exemption
Reproduced below is the exemption
document issued to Vogtle Units 3 and
Unit 4. It makes reference to the
combined safety evaluation that
provides the reasoning for the findings
made by the NRC (and listed under Item
1) in order to grant the exemption:
1. In a letter dated December 7, 2012,
and as supplemented by letters dated
January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013,
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
45990
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the licensee requested from the
Commission an exemption from the
provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix
D, Section III.B, as part of license
amendment request 12–012R, ‘‘Changes
to the Primary Sampling System’’ (LAR
12–012R).
For the reasons set forth in Section
3.1, ‘‘Evaluation of Exemption,’’ of the
NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation, which
can be found in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML13150A088, the
Commission finds that:
A. The exemption is authorized by
law;
B. the exemption presents no undue
risk to public health and safety;
C. the exemption is consistent with
the common defense and security;
D. special circumstances are present
in that the application of the rule in this
circumstance is not necessary to serve
the underlying purpose of the rule;
E. the special circumstances outweigh
any decrease in safety that may result
from the reduction in standardization
caused by the exemption; and
F. the exemption will not result in a
significant decrease in the level of safety
otherwise provided by the design.
2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted
an exemption to the provisions of 10
CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B,
to allow deviations from the certified
Design Control Document Tier 1 Section
2.3.13, Tables 2.2.1–2, 2.3.13–1, and
2.3.13–3, and Figures 2.2.1–1 and
2.3.13–1, as described in the licensee’s
request dated December 7, 2012, and as
supplemented on January 25, 2013, and
March 29, 2013. This exemption is
related to, and necessary for the granting
of License Amendment No. 10, which is
being issued concurrently with this
exemption.
3. As explained in Section 3.1,
‘‘Evaluation of Exemption,’’ of the NRC
staff’s Safety Evaluation (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13150A088), this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria
for categorical exclusion set forth in 10
CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to
10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment needs to be prepared in
connection with the issuance of the
exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of
June 19, 2013.
III. License Amendment Request
By letter dated December 7, 2012, the
licensee requested that the NRC amend
the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs
NPF–91 and NPF–92. The licensee
supplemented this application on
January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013.
The proposed amendment would depart
from Tier 2 Material previously
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jul 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
incorporated into the UFSAR.
Additionally, these Tier 2 changes
involve changes to Tier 1 Information in
the UFSAR, and the proposed
amendment would also revise the
associated material that has been
included in Appendix C of each of the
VEGP, Units 3 and 4 COLs. The
requested amendment will revise the
Tier 2 UFSAR information pertaining to
the PSS air return valve, and various
Tier 2 tables and sections regarding the
PSS design. These Tier 2 changes
require modifications to particular Tier
1 information located in Tables 2.2.1–2,
2.3.13–1, and 2.3.13–3, Figures 2.2.1–1
‘‘Containment System’’ and 2.3.13–1
‘‘Primary Sampling System,’’ and
Subsection 2.3.13, ‘‘Primary Sampling
System’’ of the UFSAR, as well as the
corresponding information in Appendix
C. These changes were necessary as part
of a design modification which changes
the type of valve used as the air return
check valve from a check valve to a
SOV; redesigns the PSS insidecontainment header; and adds a PSS
containment penetration.
The Commission has determined for
these amendments that the application
complies with the standards and
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the
Commission’s rules and regulations.
The Commission has made appropriate
findings as required by the Act and the
Commission’s rules and regulations in
10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in
the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance
of amendment to facility operating
license or combined license, as
applicable, proposed no significant
hazards consideration determination,
and opportunity for a hearing in
connection with these actions, was
published in the Federal Register on
February 19, 2013 (78 FR 11693). The
January 25, 2013 supplement revised
the original no significant hazards
consideration determination, but this
revision was captured in the February
19, 2013 Federal Register Notice. The
March 29, 2013 supplement had no
effect on the no significant hazards
consideration determination, and no
comments were received during the 60day comment period.
The Commission has determined that
these amendments satisfy the criteria for
categorical exclusion in accordance
with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant
to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared for these
amendments.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Conclusion
Using the reasons set forth in the
combined safety evaluation, the staff
granted the exemption and issued the
amendment that the licensee requested
on December 7, 2012, and
supplemented by letters dated January
25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. The
exemption and amendment were issued
on June 19, 2013 as part of a combined
package to the licensee. (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13150A052).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day
of July 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence Burkhart,
Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2013–18247 Filed 7–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026; NRC–
2008–0252]
Vogtle Electric Generating Station,
Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear
Operating Company; Change to the
Bracing Design in the Turbine Building
and Corresponding Change to
Structural Design Code
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption and combined
license amendment: Issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is granting both an
exemption to allow a departure from the
certification information of Tier 1 of the
generic design control document (DCD)
and is issuing License Amendment No.
8 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF–91
and NPF–92. The COLs were issued to
Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Inc., and Georgia Power Company,
Oglethorpe Power Corporation,
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,
and the City of Dalton, Georgia (the
licensee); for construction and operation
of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
(VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in Burke
County, Georgia. The amendment
requests to revise the design of the
bracing used to support the Turbine
Building structure. This request requires
changing Tier 1 information found in
the Design Description portion of
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
(UFSAR) Section 3.3, ‘‘Buildings.’’ The
granting of the exemption allows the
changes to Tier 1 information asked for
in the amendment. Because the
acceptability of the exemption was
determined in part by the acceptability
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45989-45990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18247]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52-026; NRC-2008-0252]
Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern
Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Primary Sampling System
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption and combined license amendment: Issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting an
exemption to allow a departure from the certification information of
Tier 1 of the generic design control document (DCD) and is issuing
License Amendment No. 10 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF-91 and NPF-92.
The COLs were issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., and
Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric
Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton, Georgia (the licensee);
for construction and operation of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
(VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, Georgia. The amendment
requests to modify the Primary Sampling System (PSS) design, including
changes to Tier 1 information located in Tables 2.2.1-2, 2.3.13-1, and
2.3.13-3, Figures 2.2.1-1 ``Containment System'' and 2.3.13-1 ``Primary
Sampling System,'' and Subsection 2.3.13, ``Primary Sampling System''
of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). The granting of
the exemption allows the changes to Tier 1 information asked for in the
amendment. Because the acceptability of the exemption was determined in
part by the acceptability of the amendment, the exemption and amendment
are being issued concurrently.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0252 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may access information related to this document, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available, using any of the following
methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0252. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the
section of this document. NRC's Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly available
documents online in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced. The request for the amendment and
exemption were submitted by letter dated December 7, 2012 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12346A396). The licensee supplemented this request on
January 25, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13028A267), and March 29, 2013
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13091A056).
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Minarik, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-6185; email: Anthony.Minarik@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is granting an exemption from Paragraph B of Section III,
``Scope and Contents,'' of Appendix D, ``Design Certification Rule for
the AP1000,'' to part 52 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) and issuing License Amendment No. 10 to COLs, NPF-91 and NPF-
92, to the licensee. The exemption is required by Paragraph A.4 of
Section VIII, ``Processes for Changes and Departures,'' Appendix D to
10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee to depart from Tier 1 information.
With the requested amendment, the licensee sought to modify the design
of the Primary Sampling System (PSS). As part of this request, the
licensee needed to change Tier 1 information located in Tables 2.2.1-2,
2.3.13-1, and 2.3.13-3, Figures 2.2.1-1 ``Containment System'' and
2.3.13-1 ``Primary Sampling System,'' and Subsection 2.3.13, ``Primary
Sampling System'' of the UFSAR. These changes were necessary as part of
a design modification which changes the type of valve used as the air
return check valve from a check valve to a solenoid-operated valve
(SOV); redesigns the PSS inside-containment header; and adds a PSS
containment penetration.
Part of the justification for granting the exemption was provided
by the review of the amendment. Because the exemption is necessary in
order to issue the requested license amendment, the NRC granted the
exemption and issued the amendment concurrently, rather than in
sequence. This included issuing a combined safety evaluation containing
the NRC staff's review of both the exemption request and the license
amendment. The exemption met all applicable regulatory criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section VIII.A.4. of Appendix D
to 10 CFR part 52. The license amendment was found to be acceptable as
well. The combined safety evaluation is available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML13150A088.
Identical exemption documents (except for referenced unit numbers
and license numbers) were issued to the licensee for Vogtle Units 3 and
4 (COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92). These documents can be found in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML13150A064 and ML13150A066. The exemption is reproduced
(with the exception of abbreviated titles and additional citations) in
Section II of this document. The amendment documents for COLs NPF-91
and NPF-92 are available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML13150A070 and
ML13150A077. A summary of the amendment documents is provided in
Section III of this document.
II. Exemption
Reproduced below is the exemption document issued to Vogtle Units 3
and Unit 4. It makes reference to the combined safety evaluation that
provides the reasoning for the findings made by the NRC (and listed
under Item 1) in order to grant the exemption:
1. In a letter dated December 7, 2012, and as supplemented by
letters dated January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013,
[[Page 45990]]
the licensee requested from the Commission an exemption from the
provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, as part of
license amendment request 12-012R, ``Changes to the Primary Sampling
System'' (LAR 12-012R).
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, ``Evaluation of
Exemption,'' of the NRC staff's Safety Evaluation, which can be found
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13150A088, the Commission finds that:
A. The exemption is authorized by law;
B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and
safety;
C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and
security;
D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the
rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying
purpose of the rule;
E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that
may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the
exemption; and
F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the
level of safety otherwise provided by the design.
2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption to the
provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, to allow
deviations from the certified Design Control Document Tier 1 Section
2.3.13, Tables 2.2.1-2, 2.3.13-1, and 2.3.13-3, and Figures 2.2.1-1 and
2.3.13-1, as described in the licensee's request dated December 7,
2012, and as supplemented on January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. This
exemption is related to, and necessary for the granting of License
Amendment No. 10, which is being issued concurrently with this
exemption.
3. As explained in Section 3.1, ``Evaluation of Exemption,'' of the
NRC staff's Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML13150A088), this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set
forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be
prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of June 19, 2013.
III. License Amendment Request
By letter dated December 7, 2012, the licensee requested that the
NRC amend the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92. The
licensee supplemented this application on January 25, 2013, and March
29, 2013. The proposed amendment would depart from Tier 2 Material
previously incorporated into the UFSAR. Additionally, these Tier 2
changes involve changes to Tier 1 Information in the UFSAR, and the
proposed amendment would also revise the associated material that has
been included in Appendix C of each of the VEGP, Units 3 and 4 COLs.
The requested amendment will revise the Tier 2 UFSAR information
pertaining to the PSS air return valve, and various Tier 2 tables and
sections regarding the PSS design. These Tier 2 changes require
modifications to particular Tier 1 information located in Tables 2.2.1-
2, 2.3.13-1, and 2.3.13-3, Figures 2.2.1-1 ``Containment System'' and
2.3.13-1 ``Primary Sampling System,'' and Subsection 2.3.13, ``Primary
Sampling System'' of the UFSAR, as well as the corresponding
information in Appendix C. These changes were necessary as part of a
design modification which changes the type of valve used as the air
return check valve from a check valve to a SOV; redesigns the PSS
inside-containment header; and adds a PSS containment penetration.
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the
application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules
and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as
required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10
CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility
operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no
significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a
hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal
Register on February 19, 2013 (78 FR 11693). The January 25, 2013
supplement revised the original no significant hazards consideration
determination, but this revision was captured in the February 19, 2013
Federal Register Notice. The March 29, 2013 supplement had no effect on
the no significant hazards consideration determination, and no comments
were received during the 60-day comment period.
The Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the
criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these
amendments.
IV. Conclusion
Using the reasons set forth in the combined safety evaluation, the
staff granted the exemption and issued the amendment that the licensee
requested on December 7, 2012, and supplemented by letters dated
January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. The exemption and amendment were
issued on June 19, 2013 as part of a combined package to the licensee.
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13150A052).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence Burkhart,
Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of
New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2013-18247 Filed 7-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P