Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5, 45864-45866 [2013-18192]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
45864
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Lieutenant
Commander Steven Fischer, Bridge
Specialist, Coast Guard Thirteenth
District; telephone (206)220–7282, email
Steven.M.Fischer2@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Multnomah County has requested a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule for the Broadway Bridge, mile
11.7, the Burnside Bridge, mile 12.4, the
Morrison Bridge, mile 12.8, and the
Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1, all
crossing the Willamette River at
Portland, OR. The requested deviation is
to accommodate the annual Providence
Bridge Pedal event. To facilitate this
event, the draws of the bridges will be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation
positions as follows: the Broadway
Bridge, mile 11.7; the Burnside Bridge,
mile 12.4; Morrison Bridge, mile 12.8;
and the Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1,
need not open for vessel traffic from 5
a.m. August 11, 2013 until 12:30 p.m.
August 11, 2013. Vessels which do not
require bridge openings may continue to
transit beneath these bridges during the
closure period. The Broadway Bridge,
mile 11.7, provides a vertical clearance
of 90 feet in the closed position, the
Burnside Bridge, mile 12.4, provides a
vertical clearance of 64 feet in the
closed position, the Morrison Bridge,
mile 12.8, provides a vertical clearance
of 69 feet in the closed position, and the
Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1, provides a
vertical clearance of 49 feet in the
closed position; all clearances are
referenced to the vertical clearance
above Columbia River Datum 0.0. The
current operating schedule for all four
bridges is set out in 33 CFR 117.897.
The normal operating schedule for all
four bridges state that they need not
open from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4
p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday.
This deviation period is from 5 a.m. on
August 11, 2013 through 12:30 p.m.
August 11, 2013. The deviation allows
the Broadway Bridge, mile 11.7, the
Burnside Bridge, mile 12.4, the
Morrison Bridge, mile 12.8, and the
Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1, across the
Willamette River, to remain in the
closed position and need not open for
maritime traffic from 5 a.m. through
12:30 p.m. on August 11, 2013. The four
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jul 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
bridges shall operate in accordance to
33 CFR § 117.897 at all other times.
Waterway usage on this stretch of the
Willamette River includes vessels
ranging from commercial tug and barge
to small pleasure craft. Mariners will be
notified and kept informed of the
bridges’ operational status via the Coast
Guard Notice to Mariners publication
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners as
appropriate. The bridges will be
required to open, if needed, for vessels
engaged in emergency response
operations during this closure period.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridges must return to their
regular operating schedules
immediately at the end of the
designated time period. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: July 24, 2013.
Daryl R. Peloquin,
Acting Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–18229 Filed 7–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0724, FRL–9839–2]
Promulgation of State Implementation
Plan Revisions; Infrastructure
Requirements for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards; Montana
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is partially approving
and partially disapproving the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from the State of Montana to
demonstrate that the SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
promulgated for fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) on July 18, 1997 and on October
17, 2006. The CAA requires that each
state, after a new or revised NAAQS is
promulgated, review their SIPs to
ensure that they meet infrastructure
requirements. The State of Montana
submitted a certification of their
infrastructure SIP for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS on February 10, 2010.
EPA is acting separately on the portions
of the February 10, 2010 submission
relating to interstate transport of air
pollution.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
29, 2013.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0724. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials CBI mean or refer to
confidential business information.
(iii) The words or initials Department or
DEQ mean or refer to the Department of
Environmental Quality.
(iv) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or
refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
(v) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to
national ambient air quality standards.
(vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to new
source review.
(vii) The initials PM mean or refer to
particulate matter.
(viii) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (fine
particulate matter).
(ix) The initials ppm mean or refer to parts
per million.
(x) The initials PSD mean or refer to
Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(xi) The initials SIP mean or refer to State
Implementation Plan.
Table of Contents
I. Background
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs
are provided in sections 110(a)(1) and
(2) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists
the specific infrastructure elements that
a SIP must contain or satisfy. The
elements that are the subject of this
action are described in detail in our
proposal of May 13, 2013 (78 FR 27891).
On May 13, 2013 (78 FR 27891), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) to act on a February
10, 2010 infrastructure SIP submission
from the State of Montana for the 1997
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. The NPR
proposed approval of the submission for
the following infrastructure elements for
the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA
Section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with
respect to the requirement to have a
minor NSR program that addresses
PM2.5; (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) with
respect to the requirements of CAA
sections 121 and 127, (K), (L), and (M).
The NPR proposed to disapprove the
submissions for the following
infrastructure elements for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA Section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) concerning requirements
for state boards under CAA section 128;
and elements (C) and (J) with respect to
the requirement to have a PSD program
that meets the requirements of part C of
Title I of the Act. Finally, the NPR
proposed to take no action on the
portion of the submission addressing
infrastructure element 110(a)(2)(D) for
the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, as
that portion will be acted on separately.
We proposed to disapprove Montana’s
February 10, 2010 submission with
respect to the requirements of three
individual infrastructure elements. The
first of these is element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii),
relevant to CAA section 128 and state
boards. The reasons for this disapproval
are detailed within our proposal. In
summary, the Montana SIP fails to
include provisions which meet the
explicit legal requirements of this
requirement of the CAA. The second
and third elements we proposed to
disapprove are provisions required by
elements 110(a)(2)(C) and (J), regarding
requirements for PSD programs to treat
nitrogen oxides as a precursor for ozone
as detailed by the ozone phase 2
implementation rule (70 FR 71612). The
analysis supporting this action is
detailed in our proposal dated May 13,
2013 (78 FR 27891).
Under a Consent Decree that has been
entered with a district court, we are
required to take final action on this
infrastructure SIP no later than July 15,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jul 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
2013. We note that on June 18, 2013
EPA received revisions to the Montana
SIP entitled, ‘‘1997 Ozone NAAQS
Implementation Rule Updates to
Montana State Implementation Plan,’’
which are intended to address the
requirements of elements (C) and (J).
That submission will be addressed in a
timely manner in a future action.
However, the impending consent decree
deadline precludes the Agency from
postponing this final action.
II. Response to Comments
No comments were received on the 5/
13/2013 proposal.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Montana’s February
10, 2010 infrastructure SIP submission
for the following infrastructure elements
for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS:
CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with
respect to the requirement to have a
minor NSR program that addresses
PM2.5; (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) with
respect to the requirements of sections
121 and 127, (K), (L), and (M). EPA is
disapproving Montana’s February 10,
2010 infrastructure SIP submission for
the following infrastructure elements for
the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA
Section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) concerning
requirements for state boards under
CAA section 128; and elements (C) and
(J) with respect to the requirement to
have a PSD program that meets the
requirements of part C of Title I of the
Act. Finally, EPA is taking no action on
Montana’s submission for infrastructure
element 110(a)(2)(D) for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS as that portion of
the submission will be acted on
separately.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law that meets Federal
requirements and disapproves state law
that does not meet Federal
requirements. This action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45865
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
45866
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 30,
2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
PART 52—[APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart BB—Montana
2. Section 52.1394 is amended by
designating the existing paragraph as (a)
and adding paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1394 Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
requirements.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
(b) On February 10, 2010, Brian
Schweitzer, Governor, State of Montana,
submitted a certification letter which
provides the State of Montana’s SIP
provisions which meet the requirements
of CAA section 110(a)(1) and (2),
elements (A), (B), (C) with respect to the
requirement to have a minor NSR
program that addresses PM2.5; (E)(i),
(E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) with respect to
the requirements of sections 121 and
127, (K), (L), and (M).
[FR Doc. 2013–18192 Filed 7–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jul 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0726, FRL–9839–9]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plan Revisions;
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 National Ambient
Air Quality Standards; Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Requirements
for PM2.5 Increments and Major and
Minor Source Baseline Dates; State
Board Requirements; North Dakota
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from the State of North Dakota to
demonstrate that the SIP meets the
infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
promulgated for fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) on July 18, 1997 and on October
17, 2006. The CAA requires that each
state, after a new or revised NAAQS is
promulgated, review their SIPs to
ensure that they meet infrastructure
requirements. The State of North Dakota
submitted certifications of their
infrastructure SIP on August 12, 2010
and May 22, 2012 for the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS. In addition, the State of North
Dakota submitted a certification of their
infrastructure SIP on May 25, 2012 for
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is also
approving SIP revisions that the State of
North Dakota submitted that update the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program and the SIP provisions
regarding state boards.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective August 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No.EPA–R08–OAR–2011–0726. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
SUMMARY:
Dated: July 12, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are
giving meaning to certain words or initials as
follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or
refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials CBI mean or refer to
confidential business information.
(iii) The word Department means or refers to
the North Dakota Department of Health.
(iv) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or
refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
(v) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to
national ambient air quality standards.
(vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to new
source review.
(vii) The initials PM mean or refer to
particulate matter.
(viii) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers
(fine particulate matter).
(ix) The initials PSD mean or refer to
Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(x) The initials SIP mean or refer to State
Implementation Plan.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. Background
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs
are provided in sections 110(a)(1) and
(2) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists
the specific infrastructure elements that
a SIP must contain or satisfy. The
elements that are the subject of this
action are described in detail in our
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR),
published on May 13, 2013 (78 FR
27898).
In the NPR, EPA proposed to approve
North Dakota’s submissions for the
following infrastructure elements for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA
section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with
respect to minor NSR and PSD
requirements, (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L), and (M). We proposed to
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 30, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45864-45866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18192]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0724, FRL-9839-2]
Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions;
Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Montana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Montana to
demonstrate that the SIP meets the infrastructure requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) promulgated for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on
July 18, 1997 and on October 17, 2006. The CAA requires that each
state, after a new or revised NAAQS is promulgated, review their SIPs
to ensure that they meet infrastructure requirements. The State of
Montana submitted a certification of their infrastructure SIP for the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS on February 10, 2010. EPA is
acting separately on the portions of the February 10, 2010 submission
relating to interstate transport of air pollution.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0724. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean
Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials CBI mean or refer to confidential business
information.
(iii) The words or initials Department or DEQ mean or refer to
the Department of Environmental Quality.
(iv) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(v) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to national ambient air
quality standards.
(vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to new source review.
(vii) The initials PM mean or refer to particulate matter.
(viii) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (fine
particulate matter).
(ix) The initials ppm mean or refer to parts per million.
(x) The initials PSD mean or refer to Prevention of Significant
Deterioration.
(xi) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation
Plan.
Table of Contents
I. Background
[[Page 45865]]
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Infrastructure requirements for SIPs are provided in sections
110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) lists the specific
infrastructure elements that a SIP must contain or satisfy. The
elements that are the subject of this action are described in detail in
our proposal of May 13, 2013 (78 FR 27891).
On May 13, 2013 (78 FR 27891), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) to act on a February 10, 2010 infrastructure SIP
submission from the State of Montana for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. The NPR proposed approval of the submission for
the following infrastructure elements for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with respect
to the requirement to have a minor NSR program that addresses
PM2.5; (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) with respect to
the requirements of CAA sections 121 and 127, (K), (L), and (M). The
NPR proposed to disapprove the submissions for the following
infrastructure elements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS:
CAA Section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) concerning requirements for state boards
under CAA section 128; and elements (C) and (J) with respect to the
requirement to have a PSD program that meets the requirements of part C
of Title I of the Act. Finally, the NPR proposed to take no action on
the portion of the submission addressing infrastructure element
110(a)(2)(D) for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, as that
portion will be acted on separately.
We proposed to disapprove Montana's February 10, 2010 submission
with respect to the requirements of three individual infrastructure
elements. The first of these is element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii), relevant to
CAA section 128 and state boards. The reasons for this disapproval are
detailed within our proposal. In summary, the Montana SIP fails to
include provisions which meet the explicit legal requirements of this
requirement of the CAA. The second and third elements we proposed to
disapprove are provisions required by elements 110(a)(2)(C) and (J),
regarding requirements for PSD programs to treat nitrogen oxides as a
precursor for ozone as detailed by the ozone phase 2 implementation
rule (70 FR 71612). The analysis supporting this action is detailed in
our proposal dated May 13, 2013 (78 FR 27891).
Under a Consent Decree that has been entered with a district court,
we are required to take final action on this infrastructure SIP no
later than July 15, 2013. We note that on June 18, 2013 EPA received
revisions to the Montana SIP entitled, ``1997 Ozone NAAQS
Implementation Rule Updates to Montana State Implementation Plan,''
which are intended to address the requirements of elements (C) and (J).
That submission will be addressed in a timely manner in a future
action. However, the impending consent decree deadline precludes the
Agency from postponing this final action.
II. Response to Comments
No comments were received on the 5/13/2013 proposal.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Montana's February 10, 2010 infrastructure SIP
submission for the following infrastructure elements for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) with
respect to the requirement to have a minor NSR program that addresses
PM2.5; (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) with respect to
the requirements of sections 121 and 127, (K), (L), and (M). EPA is
disapproving Montana's February 10, 2010 infrastructure SIP submission
for the following infrastructure elements for the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS: CAA Section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) concerning
requirements for state boards under CAA section 128; and elements (C)
and (J) with respect to the requirement to have a PSD program that
meets the requirements of part C of Title I of the Act. Finally, EPA is
taking no action on Montana's submission for infrastructure element
110(a)(2)(D) for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS as that
portion of the submission will be acted on separately.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law that meets Federal
requirements and disapproves state law that does not meet Federal
requirements. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
[[Page 45866]]
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 30, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 12, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:
PART 52--[APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart BB--Montana
0
2. Section 52.1394 is amended by designating the existing paragraph as
(a) and adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1394 Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure requirements.
* * * * *
(b) On February 10, 2010, Brian Schweitzer, Governor, State of
Montana, submitted a certification letter which provides the State of
Montana's SIP provisions which meet the requirements of CAA section
110(a)(1) and (2), elements (A), (B), (C) with respect to the
requirement to have a minor NSR program that addresses
PM2.5; (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) with respect to
the requirements of sections 121 and 127, (K), (L), and (M).
[FR Doc. 2013-18192 Filed 7-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P