Proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Assigning Environmental Responsibilities to the State of Texas for Categorical Exclusions, 45599-45600 [2013-18115]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2013 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roderick T. Nicholson, Program
Manager, Jackson Airports District
Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B,
Jackson, MS 39208–2307, (601)664–
9884. The land release request may be
reviewed in person at this same
location.
The FAA
is reviewing a request by the HuntsvilleMadison County Airport Authority to
release 4.58 acres of surplus property at
the Huntsville International Airport.
The property will be purchased by the
Alabama Department of Transportation
(ALDOT), which is a state transportation
organization. The property released will
be used for the interchange project off
Interstate Route 565. The net proceeds
from the sale of this property will be
used for FAA approved airport
purposes.
Any person may inspect the request
in person at the FAA office listed above
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
In addition, any person may, upon
request, inspect the request, notice and
other documents germane to the request
in person at the office of the HuntsvilleMadison County Airport Authority.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on July 19,
2013.
Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office,
Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–18131 Filed 7–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA—2013–0040]
Proposed Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Assigning
Environmental Responsibilities to the
State of Texas for Categorical
Exclusions
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Texas Division
Office, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed MOU and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
the FHWA and the Texas Department of
Transportation (State) have developed a
proposed MOU, pursuant to 23 U.S.C.
326, under which the FHWA would
assign to the State the FHWA’s
responsibility for determining whether a
project is categorically excluded from
preparation of an environmental
assessment or an environmental impact
statement under the National
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (NEPA), and for
carrying out certain other
responsibilities for conducting
environmental reviews, consultations,
and related activities for Federal-aid
highway projects. The public is invited
to comment on any aspect of the
proposed MOU, including the proposed
designations of categorical exclusions
and scope of environmental review,
consultation and other activities to be
assigned.
DATES: Please submit comments by
August 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DOT Document
Management System (DMS) Docket
Number FHWA–2013–0040, by any of
the methods described below. Electronic
or facsimile comments are preferred
because Federal offices experience
intermittent mail delays from security
screening.
1. Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the DOT electronic docket site.
2. Facsimile (Fax): 1–202–493–2251.
3. Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC
20590.
4. Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
For access to the docket to view a
complete copy of the proposed MOU, or
to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or to
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday,
except for Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael T. Leary, Director of Planning
and Program Development, Federal
Highway Administration Texas
Division, 300 E. 8 St., Room 826,
Austin, TX 78701, 7:00 a.m.—4:30
p.m. (CST), (512) 536–5940,
michael.leary@dot.gov.
Carlos H. Swonke, P.G., Director
Environmental Affairs Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, 125 E.
11th St., Austin, TX 78701, 8:00
a.m.—5: p.m. (CST), (512) 416–2734,
carlos.swonke@txdot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this notice may
be downloaded using a computer,
modem and suitable communications
software from the Government Printing
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45599
Office’s Electronic Bulletin Board
Service at (202) 512–1661. Internet users
may reach the Office of the Federal
Register’s home page at https://
www.archives.gov and the Government
Printing Office’s Web site at https://
www.access.gpo.gov. An electronic
version of the proposed MOU may be
downloaded by accessing the DOT DMS
docket, as described above, at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
Background
Section 326 of title 23, United States
Code (23 U.S.C. 326), allows the
Secretary of the DOT (Secretary), to
assign, and a State to assume,
responsibility for determining whether
certain designated activities are
included within classes of action that
are categorically excluded from
requirements for environmental
assessments or environmental impact
statements pursuant to regulations
promulgated by the Council on
Environmental Quality under part 1500
of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) (as in effect on October 1, 2003).
The FHWA is authorized to act on
behalf of the Secretary with respect to
these matters.
Under the proposed MOU, the FHWA
would assign to the State the
responsibility for making decisions on
the following types of categorical
exclusions:
1. Activities listed in 23 CFR
771.117(c);
2. Activities listed in 23 CFR
771.117(d).
The assignment also would give the
State the responsibility to conduct the
following environmental review,
consultation, and other related
activities:
1. Air Quality
• Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C.
7401–7671q. Any determinations that
do not involve conformity.
2. Noise
• Compliance with the noise
regulations in 23 CFR 772.
3. Wildlife
• Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531–1544, and
Section 1536
• Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16
U.S.C. 1361
• Anadromous Fish Conservation
Act, 16 U.S.C. 757a–757g
• Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,
16 U.S.C. 661–667d
• Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16
U.S.C. 703–712
• Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act of
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
45600
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 145 / Monday, July 29, 2013 / Notices
9. Executive Orders Relating to Highway
Projects
1976, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et
seq., with Essential Fish Habitat
requirements at 1855(b)(1)(B)
4. Historic and Cultural Resources
• Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended,
16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.
• 23 U.S.C. 138 and Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966, 49 U.S.C. 303 and
implementing regulations at 23 CFR
Part 774
• Archeological Resources Protection
Act of 1977, 16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–11
• Archeological and Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended,
16 U.S.C. 469–469(c)
• Native American Grave Protection
and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25
U.S.C. 3001–30131
5. Social and Economic Impacts
• American Indian Religious Freedom
Act, 42 U.S.C. 19961
• Farmland Protection Policy Act
(FPPA), 7 U.S.C. 4201–4209
6. Water Resources and Wetlands
• Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251–1377
¥ Section 404, Section 401, Section 319
• Coastal Barrier Resources Act, 16
U.S.C. 3501–3510
• Coastal Zone Management Act, 16
U.S.C. 1451–1465
• Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42
U.S.C. 300f–300j–6
• Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. 401–406
• Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899,(General Bridge Act)
Navigability Determinations and
Lighting Exemption Waivers
• Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C.
1271–1287
• Emergency Wetlands Resources Act,
16 U.S.C. 3921, 3931
• TEA–21 Wetlands Mitigation, 23
U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(m), 133 (b)(11)
• Flood Disaster Protection Act, 42
U.S.C. 4001–4128
7. Parklands
• Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C.
303
• Land and Water Conservation Fund
(LWCF) Act, 16 U.S.C. 4601–4
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8. Hazardous Materials
• Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C.
9601–9675
• Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA)
• Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901–6992k
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
• E.O. 11990, Protection of Wetlands
• E.O. 11988, Floodplain Management
• E.O. 12898, Federal Actions To
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
• E.O. 13112, Invasive Species
The MOU would allow the State to act
in the place of the FHWA in carrying
out the functions described above,
except with respect to government-togovernment consultations with
federally-recognized Indian tribes. The
FHWA will retain responsibility for
conducting formal government-togovernment consultation with federally
recognized Indian tribes, which is
required under some of the listed laws
and executive orders. The State will
continue to handle routine
consultations with the tribes and
understands that a tribe has the right to
direct consultation with the FHWA
upon request. The State also may assist
the FHWA with formal consultations,
with consent of a tribe, but the FHWA
remains responsible for the
consultation.
A copy of the proposed MOU may be
viewed on the DOT DMS Docket, as
described above, or may be obtained by
contacting the FHWA or the State at the
addresses provided above. A copy also
may be viewed on the State’s Web site
at www.txdot.gov.
The FHWA Texas Division, in
consultation with FHWA Headquarters,
will consider the comments submitted
when making its decision on the
proposed MOU revision. Any final
MOU approved by FHWA may include
changes based on comments and
consultations relating to the proposed
MOU. Once the FHWA makes a
decision on the proposed MOU, the
FHWA will place in the DOT DMS
Docket a statement describing the
outcome of the decision-making process
and a copy of any final MOU. Copies of
those documents also may be obtained
by contacting the FHWA or the State at
the addresses provided above, or by
viewing the documents at the State’s
Web site at www.txdot.gov.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 326; 42 U.S.C. 4331,
4332; 23 CFR 771.117; 40 CFR 1507.3,
1508.4.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued on: July 24, 2013.
Michael T. Leary,
Director of Planning and Program
Development, FHWA, Austin, Texas.
[FR Doc. 2013–18115 Filed 7–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0176; Notice 2]
Adrian Steel Company, Grant of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of petition grant.
AGENCY:
Adrian Steel Company
(Adrian), on behalf of Commercial
Truck and Van Equipment, Inc. (CTV),
determined that certain Model Year
2006–2008 incomplete vehicles that
CTV completed as trucks did not fully
comply with paragraphs S4.3(a), S4.3(c)
and S4.3(d) of 49 CFR 571.110, Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims for
Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less.
Adrian has filed an appropriate report
dated June 10, 2008 pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h), and 49 CFR Part 556, on June
10, 2008, Adrian submitted a petition
for an exemption from the notification
and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. NHTSA published
a notice of receipt of the petition, with
a 30-day public comment period, on
December 10, 2008, in the Federal
Register, 73 FR 75171. In response to
the petition, NHTSA did not receive any
comments. To view the petition and all
supporting documents, log onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the
online search instructions to locate
docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2008–0176.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on this decision,
contact Mr. Harry Thompson, Office of
Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), telephone (202) 366–5289,
facsimile (202) 366–5930.
Relevant Requirements of FMVSS No.
110: Among other things, FMVSS No.
110 requires certain information to be
specified on the tire and loading
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45599-45600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18115]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA--2013-0040]
Proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Assigning
Environmental Responsibilities to the State of Texas for Categorical
Exclusions
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Texas Division Office,
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed MOU and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces that the FHWA and the Texas Department
of Transportation (State) have developed a proposed MOU, pursuant to 23
U.S.C. 326, under which the FHWA would assign to the State the FHWA's
responsibility for determining whether a project is categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (NEPA), and for carrying out
certain other responsibilities for conducting environmental reviews,
consultations, and related activities for Federal-aid highway projects.
The public is invited to comment on any aspect of the proposed MOU,
including the proposed designations of categorical exclusions and scope
of environmental review, consultation and other activities to be
assigned.
DATES: Please submit comments by August 28, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DOT Document
Management System (DMS) Docket Number FHWA-2013-0040, by any of the
methods described below. Electronic or facsimile comments are preferred
because Federal offices experience intermittent mail delays from
security screening.
1. Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
2. Facsimile (Fax): 1-202-493-2251.
3. Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590.
4. Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For access to the docket to view a complete copy of the proposed
MOU, or to read background documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or to 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except for Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael T. Leary, Director of Planning and Program Development, Federal
Highway Administration Texas Division, 300 E. 8 St., Room 826, Austin,
TX 78701, 7:00 a.m.--4:30 p.m. (CST), (512) 536-5940,
michael.leary@dot.gov.
Carlos H. Swonke, P.G., Director Environmental Affairs Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, 125 E. 11th St., Austin, TX 78701, 8:00
a.m.--5: p.m. (CST), (512) 416-2734, carlos.swonke@txdot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this notice may be downloaded using a
computer, modem and suitable communications software from the
Government Printing Office's Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202)
512-1661. Internet users may reach the Office of the Federal Register's
home page at https://www.archives.gov and the Government Printing
Office's Web site at https://www.access.gpo.gov. An electronic version
of the proposed MOU may be downloaded by accessing the DOT DMS docket,
as described above, at https://www.regulations.gov/.
Background
Section 326 of title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. 326), allows
the Secretary of the DOT (Secretary), to assign, and a State to assume,
responsibility for determining whether certain designated activities
are included within classes of action that are categorically excluded
from requirements for environmental assessments or environmental impact
statements pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Council on
Environmental Quality under part 1500 of title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) (as in effect on October 1, 2003). The FHWA is
authorized to act on behalf of the Secretary with respect to these
matters.
Under the proposed MOU, the FHWA would assign to the State the
responsibility for making decisions on the following types of
categorical exclusions:
1. Activities listed in 23 CFR 771.117(c);
2. Activities listed in 23 CFR 771.117(d).
The assignment also would give the State the responsibility to
conduct the following environmental review, consultation, and other
related activities:
1. Air Quality
Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. Any
determinations that do not involve conformity.
2. Noise
Compliance with the noise regulations in 23 CFR 772.
3. Wildlife
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C.
1531-1544, and Section 1536
Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1361
Anadromous Fish Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 757a-757g
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 16 U.S.C. 661-667d
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 703-712
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
of
[[Page 45600]]
1976, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., with Essential Fish Habitat
requirements at 1855(b)(1)(B)
4. Historic and Cultural Resources
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
as amended, 16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.
23 U.S.C. 138 and Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C. 303 and implementing regulations
at 23 CFR Part 774
Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1977, 16 U.S.C.
470(aa)-11
Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 469-469(c)
Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3001-30131
5. Social and Economic Impacts
American Indian Religious Freedom Act, 42 U.S.C. 19961
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA), 7 U.S.C. 4201-4209
6. Water Resources and Wetlands
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251-1377
- Section 404, Section 401, Section 319
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, 16 U.S.C. 3501-3510
Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451-1465
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42 U.S.C. 300f-300j-6
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C.
401-406
Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899,(General
Bridge Act) Navigability Determinations and Lighting Exemption Waivers
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. 1271-1287
Emergency Wetlands Resources Act, 16 U.S.C. 3921, 3931
TEA-21 Wetlands Mitigation, 23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(m), 133
(b)(11)
Flood Disaster Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. 4001-4128
7. Parklands
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966,
49 U.S.C. 303
Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act, 16 U.S.C. 4601-4
8. Hazardous Materials
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901-
6992k
9. Executive Orders Relating to Highway Projects
E.O. 11990, Protection of Wetlands
E.O. 11988, Floodplain Management
E.O. 12898, Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations
E.O. 13112, Invasive Species
The MOU would allow the State to act in the place of the FHWA in
carrying out the functions described above, except with respect to
government-to-government consultations with federally-recognized Indian
tribes. The FHWA will retain responsibility for conducting formal
government-to-government consultation with federally recognized Indian
tribes, which is required under some of the listed laws and executive
orders. The State will continue to handle routine consultations with
the tribes and understands that a tribe has the right to direct
consultation with the FHWA upon request. The State also may assist the
FHWA with formal consultations, with consent of a tribe, but the FHWA
remains responsible for the consultation.
A copy of the proposed MOU may be viewed on the DOT DMS Docket, as
described above, or may be obtained by contacting the FHWA or the State
at the addresses provided above. A copy also may be viewed on the
State's Web site at www.txdot.gov.
The FHWA Texas Division, in consultation with FHWA Headquarters,
will consider the comments submitted when making its decision on the
proposed MOU revision. Any final MOU approved by FHWA may include
changes based on comments and consultations relating to the proposed
MOU. Once the FHWA makes a decision on the proposed MOU, the FHWA will
place in the DOT DMS Docket a statement describing the outcome of the
decision-making process and a copy of any final MOU. Copies of those
documents also may be obtained by contacting the FHWA or the State at
the addresses provided above, or by viewing the documents at the
State's Web site at www.txdot.gov.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 326; 42 U.S.C. 4331, 4332; 23 CFR 771.117;
40 CFR 1507.3, 1508.4.
Issued on: July 24, 2013.
Michael T. Leary,
Director of Planning and Program Development, FHWA, Austin, Texas.
[FR Doc. 2013-18115 Filed 7-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P