Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-WIC Nutrition Services and Administration (NSA) Cost Study, 45171-45173 [2013-17992]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2013 / Notices
other pathogen, or any article similar to
or allied with any of the foregoing.
APHIS has prepared an EA in which
we present two alternatives based on
our analysis of data submitted by
GENECTIVE SA, a review of other
scientific data, field tests conducted
under APHIS oversight, and comments
received on the petition. APHIS is
considering the following alternatives:
(1) Take no action, i.e., APHIS would
not change the regulatory status of
maize event VCO–01981–5 and it would
continue to be a regulated article, or (2)
make a determination of nonregulated
status of maize event VCO–01981–5.
The EA was prepared in accordance
with (1) NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). Based on our EA and other
pertinent scientific data, APHIS has
reached a preliminary FONSI with
regard to the preferred alternative
identified in the EA.
Based on APHIS’ analysis of field and
laboratory data submitted by
GENECTIVE SA, references provided in
the petition, peer-reviewed
publications, information analyzed in
the EA, the PPRA, comments provided
by the public, and discussion of issues
in the EA in response to those public
comments, APHIS has determined that
maize event VCO–01981–5 is unlikely
to pose a plant pest risk. We have
therefore reached a preliminary decision
to make a determination of nonregulated
status of maize event VCO–01981–5,
whereby maize event VCO–01981–5
would no longer be subject to our
regulations governing the introduction
of certain GE organisms.
We are making available for a 30-day
review period APHIS’ preliminary
regulatory determination of maize event
VCO–01981–5, along with our PPRA,
EA, and preliminary FONSI for the
preliminary determination of
nonregulated status. The EA,
preliminary FONSI, PPRA, and our
preliminary determination for maize
event VCO–01981–5, as well as the
GENECTIVE SA petition and the
comments received on the petition, are
available as indicated under ADDRESSES
and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
above. Copies of these documents may
also be obtained from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
After the 30-day review period closes,
APHIS will review and evaluate any
information received during the 30-day
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Jul 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
review period. If, after evaluating the
information received, APHIS determines
that we have not received substantive
new information that would warrant
APHIS altering our preliminary
regulatory determination or FONSI,
substantially changing the proposed
action identified in the EA, or
substantially changing the analysis of
impacts in the EA, APHIS will notify
the public through an announcement on
our Web site of our final regulatory
determination. If, however, APHIS
determines that we have received
substantive new information that would
warrant APHIS altering our preliminary
regulatory determination or FONSI,
substantially changing the proposed
action identified in the EA, or
substantially changing the analysis of
impacts in the EA, then APHIS will
notify the public of our intent to
conduct additional analysis and to
prepare an amended EA, a new FONSI,
and/or a revised PPRA, which would be
made available for public review
through the publication of a notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
APHIS will also notify the petitioner.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
July, 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–17937 Filed 7–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request–WIC Nutrition
Services and Administration (NSA)
Cost Study
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This collection is a new collection to
obtain data on how State and local WIC
agencies calculate NSA costs; how
recent Program changes have impacted
NSA costs; and how administrative
costs and policies compare to those of
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) and Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45171
Written comments must be
received on or before September 24,
2013.
DATES:
Comments are invited on (a)
whether the proposed data collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Written comments may be sent to: Dr.
Melissa Abelev, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Dr. Melissa Abelev at 703–305–2209
or via email to
Melissa.Abelev@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Dr. Melissa Abelev
at 703–305–2209.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: WIC Nutrition Services and
Administration (NSA) Cost Study.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The Special Supplemental
Nutrition Program for Women, Infants,
and Children (WIC), (Pub. L. 109–85), is
administered at the Federal level by the
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Through Federal grants to States, WIC
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
45172
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2013 / Notices
provides low-income pregnant,
breastfeeding, and postpartum women,
infants, and children up to age five with
nutritious supplemental foods. The
program also provides nutrition
education and referrals to health and
social services.
NSA costs, the focus of this study, are
the direct and indirect costs, which
State and local agencies determine to be
necessary to support WIC Program
operations, exclusive of food costs. NSA
costs include, but are not limited to, the
costs of Program administration, startup, monitoring, auditing, the
development of and accountability for
food delivery systems, nutrition
education and breastfeeding promotion
and support, outreach, certification, and
developing and printing food
instruments and cash-value vouchers.
The current federal WIC regulations
are designed to encourage women to
breastfeed and to provide appropriate
nutritional support for WIC participants.
As part of these provisions, States must
spend a minimum amount of grant
funds, as determined by a national
formula, on nutrition education and
breastfeeding support services.
The last study on NSA costs took
place in 2000. Since then, there have
been many changes in the WIC
Program—from new food packages, to
the Value Enhanced Nutrition
Assessment (VENA), to Management
Information System (MIS) upgrades, and
the start of the mandated conversion to
Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT)
cards—all of which have impacted NSA
costs. A census of state and local
agencies will be conducted to provide
insight into how NSA grant funds are
used and have been impacted by recent
changes. It will also provide a point of
comparison with the administrative
costs of other federal assistance
programs by collecting data from state
and local officials overseeing SNAP and
TANF.
Data will be collected in four ways:
(1) The collection of extant WIC State
agency documents as summarized
annually on FNS Forms 798 and 798–
A (currently approved under 0584–
0045); (2) a web survey of all WIC State
and local agencies (preceded by a letter
of introduction and recruitment); (3) key
informant interviews with WIC
administrators in 14 WIC State agencies
plus interviews with 32 local agency
directors within these State agencies;
and (4) key informant interviews with
state SNAP and TANF officials in nine
jurisdictions plus interviews with two
local SNAP/TANF agency officials
(preceded by a letter of introduction and
recruitment).
Affected Public: State, Local, and
Tribal Government: Respondent groups
identified include: All State WIC
Directors; all local WIC agency
Directors; selected State WIC Directors;
selected local WIC agency Directors;
selected state and local SNAP and
TANF agencies.
Estimated
number respondent
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Respondent
Reporting Burden
State WIC Director Form 798/798–A Extant Data
Request ...................................................................
State WIC Director Letter of Introduction and Recruitment ..................................................................
State WIC Director Web Survey .................................
State WIC Director Interview ......................................
State SNAP Official Letter of Introduction and Recruitment ..................................................................
State SNAP Official Interview .....................................
State TANF Official Letter of Introduction and Recruitment ..................................................................
State TANF Official Interview .....................................
Local WIC Agency Director Letter of Introduction and
Recruitment .............................................................
Local WIC Agency Director Web Survey ...................
Local WIC Agency Director Interview .........................
Local SNAP Official Letter of Introduction and Recruitment ..................................................................
Local SNAP Official Interview .....................................
Local TANF Official Letter of Introduction and Recruitment ..................................................................
Local TANF Official Interview .....................................
Total Reporting Burden .......................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Jul 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Responses
annually per
respondent
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The total estimated number of
respondents is 4,156. This includes: 90
State WIC directors (extant data
request); 90 State WIC directors (letter);
90 State WIC Directors (web survey); 14
State WIC directors (interview); 1,900
local WIC agency directors (letter); 1,900
local WIC agency directors (web
survey); 32 local WIC agency directors
(interview); 9 state SNAP agency
officials (letter); 9 state SNAP agency
officials (interview); 9 state TANF
agency officials (letter); 9 state TANF
agency officials (interview); one local
SNAP agency official (letter); one local
SNAP agency official (interview); one
local TANF agency official (letter); one
local SNAP agency official (interview).
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: All response tasks listed
above require just one response each.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
4,156.
Estimated Time per Response: The
estimated time for each response is
shown in the burden table below.
Dividing the total hours of 2,772.00 by
the 4,156 respondents (or responses)
yields an average estimated time of .667
hours per response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,772.00 hours. See the
table following for estimated total
annual burden for each type of
respondent.
Total annual responses
(column b × c)
Estimated average number
of hours per
response
Estimated total
hours
(column d × e)
90
1
90
1.00
90.00
90
90
14
1
1
1
90
90
14
0.33
1.00
4.00
30.00
90.00
56.00
9
9
1
1
9
9
0.25
1.50
2.25
13.50
9
9
1
1
9
9
0.25
1.50
2.25
13.50
1,900
1,900
32
1
1
1
1,900
1,900
32
0.25
1.00
3.00
475.00
1,900
96.00
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.25
1.50
0.25
1.50
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.25
1.50
0.25
1.50
4,156
1
4,156
.666987
2,772.00
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 144 / Friday, July 26, 2013 / Notices
Dated: July 17, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–17992 Filed 7–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Enhancing
Completion Rates for Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
Quality Control Reviews
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This is a new collection for Enhancing
Completion Rates for SNAP Quality
Control Reviews.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before September 24,
2013.
SUMMARY:
Comments are invited on (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to Steven
Carlson, Office of Research and
Analysis, Food and Nutrition Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Steven Carlson at 703–305–2576 or
via email to
Steve.Carlson@fns.usda.gov. Comments
will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:54 Jul 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Steven Carlson at
703–305–2017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title:
Enhancing Completion Rates for SNAP
(Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program) Quality Control Reviews.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection of
information.
Abstract:
Section 17 [7 U.S.C. 2026] (a)(1) of the
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008,
provides general legislative authority for
the planned data collection. It
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
to enter into contracts with private
institutions to undertake research that
will help improve the administration
and effectiveness of SNAP in delivering
nutrition-related benefits.
States conduct monthly quality
control (QC) reviews of a statistical
sample of households participating in
SNAP to assess the validity of SNAP
cases and, ultimately, the error rate for
SNAP. This requires completing as
many reviews as possible. However,
beginning in 1985, the completion rate
of sampled QC reviews decreased
nationally, reaching a low in FY 2006.
The completion rate has increased
somewhat since then, but not to
previous levels. Completion rates vary
considerably among States as well. This
research will identify the factors
associated with incomplete reviews in
active SNAP cases and recommend
ways to enhance completion rates for
SNAP QC reviews.
Primary data collected from persons
involved in conducting and monitoring
the QC reviews and extant State
administrative data, will be analyzed to
compare information across the States;
provide descriptive estimates of the
contribution to payment error associated
with incomplete reviews; and assess the
need to adjust the current procedures
for treating incomplete cases.
The information collection includes
site visits at six State agencies, in-depth
(semi-structured) interviews with SNAP
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45173
QC staff during those site visits, and
Web and telephone interviews with
SNAP QC staff in the remaining 47
States not being visited. The SNAP QC
director, up to two SNAP QC
supervisors and up to five State QC
reviewers from each State will be
interviewed.1
The specific research objectives are to:
describe the process of conducting a QC
review at the State and Federal levels;
describe the characteristics of
incomplete cases and compare them to
complete cases using extant
administrative case file data; describe
the challenges and best practices in the
QC review process at the State level;
determine whether incomplete cases are
being reviewed and processed correctly;
determine the impact of incomplete
cases on overall payment error; and
determine the extent to which
incomplete cases bias the data in the QC
database.
Affected Public:
State Employees: Respondent groups
identified include (1) State QC directors,
if the position exists or State SNAP
directors, in all 53 SNAP States; (2)
State QC supervisors in 53 SNAP States,
up to 2 per State (if more than 2 in a
State, selected as a sample of
convenience); and (3) State QC
reviewers from 53 SNAP States, up to 5
per State (if more than 5 in a State,
selected as a sample of convenience).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The total estimated number of
respondents is 424. This includes 53
State QC or State SNAP directors (1 in
the pretest, 100 percent of whom will
complete interviews; 6 in person, 100
percent of whom will complete
interviews; and 46 online or by
telephone, 78 percent of whom will
complete surveys); 106 State QC
supervisors (3 in the pretest, 100
percent of whom will complete
interviews; 12 in person, 100 percent of
whom will complete interviews; and 91
online or by telephone, 81 percent of
whom will complete surveys); and 265
State QC reviewers (5 in the pretest, 100
percent of whom will complete
interviews; 30 in person, 100 percent of
whom will complete interviews; and
230 online or by telephone, 81 percent
of whom will complete surveys).
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent:
1 Additional information contributing to this
research will be collected from FNS regional offices
and staff acting in their official capacities (not
subject to OMB approval) and SNAP participants
sampled for QC with incomplete reviews (OMB
approval previously granted for the QC Review
Schedule (0584–0299) and Worksheet for QC
Reviews (0584–0074)).
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 144 (Friday, July 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45171-45173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17992]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request-WIC Nutrition Services and Administration (NSA) Cost
Study
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This collection is a new
collection to obtain data on how State and local WIC agencies calculate
NSA costs; how recent Program changes have impacted NSA costs; and how
administrative costs and policies compare to those of Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 24,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed data
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Written comments may be sent to: Dr. Melissa Abelev, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted
via fax to the attention of Dr. Melissa Abelev at 703-305-2209 or via
email to Melissa.Abelev@fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Dr. Melissa
Abelev at 703-305-2209.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: WIC Nutrition Services and Administration (NSA) Cost Study.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women,
Infants, and Children (WIC), (Pub. L. 109-85), is administered at the
Federal level by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Through Federal grants to States, WIC
[[Page 45172]]
provides low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and postpartum women,
infants, and children up to age five with nutritious supplemental
foods. The program also provides nutrition education and referrals to
health and social services.
NSA costs, the focus of this study, are the direct and indirect
costs, which State and local agencies determine to be necessary to
support WIC Program operations, exclusive of food costs. NSA costs
include, but are not limited to, the costs of Program administration,
start-up, monitoring, auditing, the development of and accountability
for food delivery systems, nutrition education and breastfeeding
promotion and support, outreach, certification, and developing and
printing food instruments and cash-value vouchers.
The current federal WIC regulations are designed to encourage women
to breastfeed and to provide appropriate nutritional support for WIC
participants. As part of these provisions, States must spend a minimum
amount of grant funds, as determined by a national formula, on
nutrition education and breastfeeding support services.
The last study on NSA costs took place in 2000. Since then, there
have been many changes in the WIC Program--from new food packages, to
the Value Enhanced Nutrition Assessment (VENA), to Management
Information System (MIS) upgrades, and the start of the mandated
conversion to Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards--all of which
have impacted NSA costs. A census of state and local agencies will be
conducted to provide insight into how NSA grant funds are used and have
been impacted by recent changes. It will also provide a point of
comparison with the administrative costs of other federal assistance
programs by collecting data from state and local officials overseeing
SNAP and TANF.
Data will be collected in four ways: (1) The collection of extant
WIC State agency documents as summarized annually on FNS Forms 798 and
798-A (currently approved under 0584-0045); (2) a web survey of all WIC
State and local agencies (preceded by a letter of introduction and
recruitment); (3) key informant interviews with WIC administrators in
14 WIC State agencies plus interviews with 32 local agency directors
within these State agencies; and (4) key informant interviews with
state SNAP and TANF officials in nine jurisdictions plus interviews
with two local SNAP/TANF agency officials (preceded by a letter of
introduction and recruitment).
Affected Public: State, Local, and Tribal Government: Respondent
groups identified include: All State WIC Directors; all local WIC
agency Directors; selected State WIC Directors; selected local WIC
agency Directors; selected state and local SNAP and TANF agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated number of
respondents is 4,156. This includes: 90 State WIC directors (extant
data request); 90 State WIC directors (letter); 90 State WIC Directors
(web survey); 14 State WIC directors (interview); 1,900 local WIC
agency directors (letter); 1,900 local WIC agency directors (web
survey); 32 local WIC agency directors (interview); 9 state SNAP agency
officials (letter); 9 state SNAP agency officials (interview); 9 state
TANF agency officials (letter); 9 state TANF agency officials
(interview); one local SNAP agency official (letter); one local SNAP
agency official (interview); one local TANF agency official (letter);
one local SNAP agency official (interview).
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: All response tasks
listed above require just one response each.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 4,156.
Estimated Time per Response: The estimated time for each response
is shown in the burden table below. Dividing the total hours of
2,772.00 by the 4,156 respondents (or responses) yields an average
estimated time of .667 hours per response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,772.00 hours. See
the table following for estimated total annual burden for each type of
respondent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Estimated Responses Total annual average number Estimated
Respondent number annually per responses of hours per total hours
respondent respondent (column b x c) response (column d x e)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Burden
State WIC Director Form 798/ 90 1 90 1.00 90.00
798-A Extant Data Request..
State WIC Director Letter of 90 1 90 0.33 30.00
Introduction and
Recruitment................
State WIC Director Web 90 1 90 1.00 90.00
Survey.....................
State WIC Director Interview 14 1 14 4.00 56.00
State SNAP Official Letter 9 1 9 0.25 2.25
of Introduction and
Recruitment................
State SNAP Official 9 1 9 1.50 13.50
Interview..................
State TANF Official Letter 9 1 9 0.25 2.25
of Introduction and
Recruitment................
State TANF Official 9 1 9 1.50 13.50
Interview..................
Local WIC Agency Director 1,900 1 1,900 0.25 475.00
Letter of Introduction and
Recruitment................
Local WIC Agency Director 1,900 1 1,900 1.00 1,900
Web Survey.................
Local WIC Agency Director 32 1 32 3.00 96.00
Interview..................
Local SNAP Official Letter 1 1 1 0.25 0.25
of Introduction and
Recruitment................
Local SNAP Official 1 1 1 1.50 1.50
Interview..................
Local TANF Official Letter 1 1 1 0.25 0.25
of Introduction and
Recruitment................
Local TANF Official 1 1 1 1.50 1.50
Interview..................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Reporting Burden.. 4,156 1 4,156 .666987 2,772.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45173]]
Dated: July 17, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-17992 Filed 7-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P