Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 44972 [2013-17874]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
44972
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 143 / Thursday, July 25, 2013 / Notices
terminate the investigation in its
entirety based on the consent order
stipulations, proposed consent orders,
and settlement agreements attached to
the motion. In the motion, the parties
stated that there are no other
agreements, written or oral, express or
implied between the parties concerning
the subject matter of the investigation.
On June 14, 2013, the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a
response in conditional support of the
joint motion, provided that the parties
modify the proposed consent orders to
specify the activities authorized by the
settlement agreements between the
parties. On June 21, 2013, complainants
and respondents jointly moved for leave
to file a reply to the IA’s response to the
joint motion. On June 24, 2013, the IA
indicated to the ALJ that given the
changes made to the consent orders
submitted with the parties’ reply, the IA
does not oppose the joint motion to
terminate.
On July 1, 2013, the ALJ issued the
subject ID granting the joint motion. The
ALJ found that there is good cause for
terminating the investigation, and that
he is not aware of any extraordinary
circumstances that would preclude
granting the motion. The ALJ further
found that entry of the proposed
consent orders and termination of the
investigation is in the public interest.
On July 9, 2013, the ALJ issued a
corrected version of the subject ID to
include the revised versions of the
consent orders. No petitions for review
were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
District of Colorado in the lawsuit
entitled United States v. Williams Four
Corners LLC, Civil Action No. 13-cv1923. In its Complaint the United States
seeks civil penalties and injunctive
relief against Williams Four Corners,
LLC (‘‘Williams’’) for violations of the
permit issued pursuant to Part C of
Subchapter I of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7475
(Prevention of Significant Deterioration
or ‘‘PSD’’) and the regulations
promulgated thereunder at 40 CFR
52.21, and the federal operating permit
program set forth at Title V of the CAA,
42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f (‘‘Title V’’) and
the regulations promulgated thereunder
at 40 CFR part 71, at a facility known
as PLA–9 Central Deliver Point, also
known as PLA–9 CDP (the ‘‘PLA–9
Facility’’). The PLA–9 Facility is located
approximately 18 miles southwest of
Durango, Colorado, and within the
exterior boundaries of the Southern Ute
Indian Reservation. The PLA–9 Facility
is now shut down. The Decree requires
Williams pay a $63,000 civil penalty to
settle the alleged violations. Should
Williams restart any operations at PLA–
9 within the next two years, the Decree
requires Williams comply with the
requirements of the PSD Permit
applicable to any emitting units that
may be restarted or replaced.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment. Comments
should be addressed to the Acting
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and should refer to United
States v. Williams Four Corners, LLC,
D.J. Ref. No. DOJ # 90–5–2–1–10120. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
Send them to:
By e-mail ............
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 19, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
To submit
comments:
pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ–ENRD,
PO Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–
7611.
By mail ...............
[FR Doc. 2013–17847 Filed 7–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On July 18, 2013 the Department of
Justice filed a Complaint and
simultaneously lodged a proposed
Consent Decree (‘‘Decree’’) with the
United States District Court for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:49 Jul 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide
a paper copy of the Consent Decree
upon written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to: Consent Decree
Library, U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Please enclose a check or money order
for $7.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Robert Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–17874 Filed 7–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 12–52]
George R. Smith, M.D.; Decision and
Order
On February 5, 2013, Administrative
Law Judge (ALJ) Gail A. Randall issued
the attached Recommended Decision.
Therein, the ALJ recommended that I
deny Respondent’s pending application
for a DEA Certificate of Registration as
a practitioner. Respondent did not file
exceptions to the Recommended
Decision.
Having reviewed the entire record, I
have decided to adopt the ALJ’s
Recommended Decision in its entirety.
Accordingly, Respondent’s application
will be denied.
Order
Pursuant to the authority vested in me
by 21 U.S.C. 823(f) and 28 CFR 0.100(b),
I order that the application of George R.
Smith, M.D., for a DEA Certificate of
Registration as a practitioner, be, and it
hereby is, denied. This Order is effective
immediately.
Dated: July 16, 2013.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Administrator.
Krista Tongring, Esq., for the Government
Louis Leichter, Esq. and Andre D’Souza, Esq.,
for the Respondent
Recommended Rulings, Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision
of the Administrative Law Judge
I. Introduction
Gail A. Randall, Administrative Law
Judge. This proceeding is an
adjudication pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
551 et seq., to determine whether the
Drug Enforcement Administration
(‘‘DEA’’ or ‘‘Government’’) should deny
a physician’s application for a DEA
Certificate of Registration pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 823(f) (2006). Without such
registration, the physician, George R.
Smith, M.D. (‘‘Respondent’’ or ‘‘Dr.
Smith’’), would be unable to lawfully
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 44972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17874]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On July 18, 2013 the Department of Justice filed a Complaint and
simultaneously lodged a proposed Consent Decree (``Decree'') with the
United States District Court for the District of Colorado in the
lawsuit entitled United States v. Williams Four Corners LLC, Civil
Action No. 13-cv-1923. In its Complaint the United States seeks civil
penalties and injunctive relief against Williams Four Corners, LLC
(``Williams'') for violations of the permit issued pursuant to Part C
of Subchapter I of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7475 (Prevention of Significant
Deterioration or ``PSD'') and the regulations promulgated thereunder at
40 CFR 52.21, and the federal operating permit program set forth at
Title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661-7661f (``Title V'') and the
regulations promulgated thereunder at 40 CFR part 71, at a facility
known as PLA-9 Central Deliver Point, also known as PLA-9 CDP (the
``PLA-9 Facility''). The PLA-9 Facility is located approximately 18
miles southwest of Durango, Colorado, and within the exterior
boundaries of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation. The PLA-9 Facility
is now shut down. The Decree requires Williams pay a $63,000 civil
penalty to settle the alleged violations. Should Williams restart any
operations at PLA-9 within the next two years, the Decree requires
Williams comply with the requirements of the PSD Permit applicable to
any emitting units that may be restarted or replaced.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment.
Comments should be addressed to the Acting Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United
States v. Williams Four Corners, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. DOJ 90-5-
2-1-10120. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30)
days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By e-mail................................. pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
By mail................................... Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ-ENRD, PO Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy
of the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $7.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.
Robert Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-17874 Filed 7-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
