Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) Airman Testing Standards and Training Working Group (ATSTWG), 44619-44620 [2013-17782]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Notices
Authority 234, dated October 1, 1999,
which remains in effect.
This delegation of authority shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Dated: July 15, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013–17802 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No: FAA–2013–0649]
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC) Airman Testing
Standards and Training Working
Group (ATSTWG)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Request for Comment
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of additional draft Airman
Certification Standards (ACS)
documents developed by the ATSTWG
for the authorized instructor certificate,
the private pilot certificate and the
instrument rating. These documents are
available for public review, download,
and comment.
DATES: Send comments on or before
August 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2013–0649
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at (202) 493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jul 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Van
L. Kerns, Manager, Regulatory Support
Division, FAA Flight Standards Service,
AFS 600, FAA Mike Monroney
Aeronautical Center, P.O. Box 25082,
Oklahoma City, OK 73125; telephone
(405) 954–4431, email
van.l.kerns@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 30, 2012, the ARAC
Executive Committee accepted the
FAA’s assignment of a new task arising
from recommendations of the Airman
Testing Standards and Training
Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC).
The ARC recommended ways to ensure
that the FAA’s airman testing and
training materials better support
reduction of fatal general aviation
accidents. The new task instructed the
ARAC to integrate aeronautical
knowledge and flight proficiency
requirements for the private pilot and
flight instructor certificates and the
instrument rating into a single ACS
document for each type of certificate
and rating; to develop a detailed
proposal to realign FAA training
handbooks with the ACS documents;
and to propose knowledge test item
bank questions consistent with the
integrated ACS documents and the
principles set forth in the ARC’s
recommendations.
The FAA announced the ARAC’s
acceptance of this task through a
Federal Register Notice published on
September 12, 2012 [77 FR 56251]. This
Notice described the task elements and
solicited participants for the ATSTWG,
which subsequently formed and began
its work in November 2012.
Consistent with the first part of this
tasking, the ATSTWG developed draft
ACS documents that align the
aeronautical knowledge testing
standards with the flight proficiency
standards set out in the existing
Practical Test Standards (PTS). In
addition to supporting the FAA’s effort
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44619
to improve the relevance, reliability,
validity, and effectiveness of
aeronautical testing and training
materials, the draft ACS documents
support the FAA’s goal of reducing fatal
general aviation accidents by
incorporating task-specific risk
management considerations into each
Area of Operation.
The ATSTWG completed its initial
work on the ACS for the private pilot
certificate and the instrument rating in
April, 2013. At the request of the
ATSTWG, the FAA made these
documents available for public
comment through docket number FAA–
2013–0316. The comment period for the
notice published on April 24, 2013 (78
FR 24289) closed May 24, 2013. Also at
the request of the ATSTWG, the FAA
reopened the comment period until July
8, 2013.
During these periods, the ATSTWG
received more than 300 comments and
questions on the draft ACS for the
private pilot certificate and the
instrument rating. The ATSTWG has
used these comments to inform and
refine its continuing work on this
project, and has consequently asked the
FAA to make the revised versions of
these documents available for on
additional period of public review and
comment before it completes its work in
September, 2013.
In addition, the ATSTWG has
completed its initial draft of the
authorized instructor ACS document.
The purpose of the authorized instructor
ACS is to define the acceptable
performance standards for instructional
knowledge and skill, including the
Fundamentals of Instructing (FOI)
concepts listed in 14 CFR part 61.
Consistent with its desire for comments
to help refine its work, the ATSTWG
has asked the FAA to make this
document available for public comment
as well.
In making this document available,
the ATSTWG wishes to note that while
the draft authorized instructor ACS
follows the overall conceptual
framework developed for the private
pilot ACS and the instrument rating
ACS, its construction reflects
fundamental differences between the
family of pilot certificates/ratings and
the instructor certificate. The core of the
authorized instructor ACS addresses
practical application of the instructional
concepts and techniques presented in
the traditional FOI. The authorized
instructor ACS uses appendices to
define the acceptable standards for
knowledge, skill, and risk management
in the aeronautical proficiency tasks
unique to a particular instructor
certificate or rating.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
44620
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Notices
The ATSTWG also wishes to
emphasize that the authorized instructor
ACS is not intended to be a stand-alone
document. Rather, it is intended to be
used in conjunction with the pilot
certificate level or rating ACS for which
the instructor-applicant seeks
authorization to provide instruction.
Therefore, in addition to mastery of the
knowledge and skills defined in the
authorized instructor ACS, the
instructor-applicant must demonstrate
instructional competence for Tasks in
the ACS for the appropriate certificate
level or rating, to include analyzing and
correcting common learner errors.
The ATSTWG continues work to
complete its remaining assignments.
These include developing a detailed
proposal to realign and, as appropriate,
streamline and consolidate existing
FAA guidance material (e.g.,
handbooks) with each integrated ACS
document; and to propose
methodologies to ensure that knowledge
test item bank questions are consistent
with both the ACS documents and the
test question development principles set
forth in the ARC’s recommendations.
The ACS documents are designed as
the foundation for transitioning to a
more integrated and systematic
approach to airman certification testing
and training. To accomplish this
objective and achieve its overall safety
goals, the ACS documents support the
safety management system (SMS)
framework. SMS methodology provides
a systematic approach to achieving
acceptable levels of safety risk. The
ATSTWG is constructing ACS,
associated guidance, and test item bank
question components of the airman
certification system around the four
functional components of SMS:
• Safety Policy that demonstrates
FAA senior management commitment to
continually improve safety through
enhancements to the airman
certification testing and training system;
specifically, better integration of the
aeronautical knowledge, flight
proficiency, and risk management
components of the airman certification
system;
• Safety Risk Management processes
that create a structured means of safety
risk management decision making to
identify, assess, and determine
acceptable level of risk associated with
regulatory changes, safety
recommendations, or other factors
requiring modification of airman testing
and training materials;
• Safety Assurance processes which
allow increased confidence on the part
of industry and FAA stakeholders in
risk controls through a continual review
of FAA products and the systematic,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jul 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
prompt and appropriate incorporation
of changes arising from new regulations,
data analysis, and safety
recommendations; and
• Safety Promotion framework to
support a positive safety culture in the
form of training and ongoing
engagement with both external
stakeholders (e.g., the aviation training
industry) and FAA policy divisions.
Time permitting, and given the
foundational nature of the ACS
documents and their importance in the
ongoing evolution of the FAA’s airman
certification testing and training system,
the ATSTWG wishes to make
subsequent revised draft ACS
documents for the private pilot
certificate and the instrument rating,
and of its current initial draft of the
authorized instructor ACS, available to
the public for one additional period of
review and comment before it completes
its work in September 2013. The
ATSTWG would use the comments it
receives to complete its work on this
project and to develop its final report
and recommendations.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 19, 2013.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2013–17782 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0045]
Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below will be forwarded to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and its expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period was published on April 18, 2013
(78 FR 23330). No comments were
received.
Comments: Comments should be
directed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 23, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Piazza, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, Office of the Chief
Counsel (NCC–111), (202) 366–9511,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Title: Criminal Penalty Safe Harbor
Provision.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0609.
Frequency: We believe that there will
be very few criminal prosecutions under
49 U.S.C. 30170, given the lack of
prosecutions under the statute to date.
Accordingly, it is not likely to be a
substantial motivating force for a
submission of a corrected report in
response to an agency request for
information. See Summary of the
Collection of Information below. Based
on our experience to date, we estimate
that no more than one (1) person per
year would be subject to this collection
of information, and we do not anticipate
receiving more than one report a year
from any particular person.
Affected Public: This collection of
information would apply to any person
who seeks a ‘‘safe harbor’’ from
potential criminal liability under 49
U.S.C. 30170. Thus, the collection of
information could apply to the
manufacturers, any officers or
employees thereof, and other persons
who respond or have a duty to respond
to an information provision requirement
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30166 or a
regulation, requirement, request or order
issued thereunder.
Abstract: NHTSA has published a
final rule related to ‘‘reasonable time’’
and sufficient manner of ‘‘correction,’’
as they apply to the safe harbor from
criminal penalties, as required by
Section 5 of the Transportation Recall
Enhancement, Accountability, and
Documentation (TREAD) Act (Pub. L.
106–414), which was enacted on
November 1, 2000. 65 FR 38380 (July
24, 2001).
Estimated Annual Burden: Using the
above estimate of one (1) affected person
a year, with an estimated two (2) hours
of preparation to collect and provide the
information, at an assumed rate of
$26.70 an hour, the annual, estimated
cost of collecting and preparing the
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44619-44620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17782]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No: FAA-2013-0649]
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) Airman Testing
Standards and Training Working Group (ATSTWG)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Request for Comment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of additional draft
Airman Certification Standards (ACS) documents developed by the ATSTWG
for the authorized instructor certificate, the private pilot
certificate and the instrument rating. These documents are available
for public review, download, and comment.
DATES: Send comments on or before August 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-0649
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at (202) 493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Van L. Kerns, Manager, Regulatory
Support Division, FAA Flight Standards Service, AFS 600, FAA Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125;
telephone (405) 954-4431, email van.l.kerns@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 30, 2012, the ARAC Executive Committee accepted the FAA's
assignment of a new task arising from recommendations of the Airman
Testing Standards and Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC). The
ARC recommended ways to ensure that the FAA's airman testing and
training materials better support reduction of fatal general aviation
accidents. The new task instructed the ARAC to integrate aeronautical
knowledge and flight proficiency requirements for the private pilot and
flight instructor certificates and the instrument rating into a single
ACS document for each type of certificate and rating; to develop a
detailed proposal to realign FAA training handbooks with the ACS
documents; and to propose knowledge test item bank questions consistent
with the integrated ACS documents and the principles set forth in the
ARC's recommendations.
The FAA announced the ARAC's acceptance of this task through a
Federal Register Notice published on September 12, 2012 [77 FR 56251].
This Notice described the task elements and solicited participants for
the ATSTWG, which subsequently formed and began its work in November
2012.
Consistent with the first part of this tasking, the ATSTWG
developed draft ACS documents that align the aeronautical knowledge
testing standards with the flight proficiency standards set out in the
existing Practical Test Standards (PTS). In addition to supporting the
FAA's effort to improve the relevance, reliability, validity, and
effectiveness of aeronautical testing and training materials, the draft
ACS documents support the FAA's goal of reducing fatal general aviation
accidents by incorporating task-specific risk management considerations
into each Area of Operation.
The ATSTWG completed its initial work on the ACS for the private
pilot certificate and the instrument rating in April, 2013. At the
request of the ATSTWG, the FAA made these documents available for
public comment through docket number FAA-2013-0316. The comment period
for the notice published on April 24, 2013 (78 FR 24289) closed May 24,
2013. Also at the request of the ATSTWG, the FAA reopened the comment
period until July 8, 2013.
During these periods, the ATSTWG received more than 300 comments
and questions on the draft ACS for the private pilot certificate and
the instrument rating. The ATSTWG has used these comments to inform and
refine its continuing work on this project, and has consequently asked
the FAA to make the revised versions of these documents available for
on additional period of public review and comment before it completes
its work in September, 2013.
In addition, the ATSTWG has completed its initial draft of the
authorized instructor ACS document. The purpose of the authorized
instructor ACS is to define the acceptable performance standards for
instructional knowledge and skill, including the Fundamentals of
Instructing (FOI) concepts listed in 14 CFR part 61. Consistent with
its desire for comments to help refine its work, the ATSTWG has asked
the FAA to make this document available for public comment as well.
In making this document available, the ATSTWG wishes to note that
while the draft authorized instructor ACS follows the overall
conceptual framework developed for the private pilot ACS and the
instrument rating ACS, its construction reflects fundamental
differences between the family of pilot certificates/ratings and the
instructor certificate. The core of the authorized instructor ACS
addresses practical application of the instructional concepts and
techniques presented in the traditional FOI. The authorized instructor
ACS uses appendices to define the acceptable standards for knowledge,
skill, and risk management in the aeronautical proficiency tasks unique
to a particular instructor certificate or rating.
[[Page 44620]]
The ATSTWG also wishes to emphasize that the authorized instructor
ACS is not intended to be a stand-alone document. Rather, it is
intended to be used in conjunction with the pilot certificate level or
rating ACS for which the instructor-applicant seeks authorization to
provide instruction. Therefore, in addition to mastery of the knowledge
and skills defined in the authorized instructor ACS, the instructor-
applicant must demonstrate instructional competence for Tasks in the
ACS for the appropriate certificate level or rating, to include
analyzing and correcting common learner errors.
The ATSTWG continues work to complete its remaining assignments.
These include developing a detailed proposal to realign and, as
appropriate, streamline and consolidate existing FAA guidance material
(e.g., handbooks) with each integrated ACS document; and to propose
methodologies to ensure that knowledge test item bank questions are
consistent with both the ACS documents and the test question
development principles set forth in the ARC's recommendations.
The ACS documents are designed as the foundation for transitioning
to a more integrated and systematic approach to airman certification
testing and training. To accomplish this objective and achieve its
overall safety goals, the ACS documents support the safety management
system (SMS) framework. SMS methodology provides a systematic approach
to achieving acceptable levels of safety risk. The ATSTWG is
constructing ACS, associated guidance, and test item bank question
components of the airman certification system around the four
functional components of SMS:
Safety Policy that demonstrates FAA senior management
commitment to continually improve safety through enhancements to the
airman certification testing and training system; specifically, better
integration of the aeronautical knowledge, flight proficiency, and risk
management components of the airman certification system;
Safety Risk Management processes that create a structured
means of safety risk management decision making to identify, assess,
and determine acceptable level of risk associated with regulatory
changes, safety recommendations, or other factors requiring
modification of airman testing and training materials;
Safety Assurance processes which allow increased
confidence on the part of industry and FAA stakeholders in risk
controls through a continual review of FAA products and the systematic,
prompt and appropriate incorporation of changes arising from new
regulations, data analysis, and safety recommendations; and
Safety Promotion framework to support a positive safety
culture in the form of training and ongoing engagement with both
external stakeholders (e.g., the aviation training industry) and FAA
policy divisions.
Time permitting, and given the foundational nature of the ACS
documents and their importance in the ongoing evolution of the FAA's
airman certification testing and training system, the ATSTWG wishes to
make subsequent revised draft ACS documents for the private pilot
certificate and the instrument rating, and of its current initial draft
of the authorized instructor ACS, available to the public for one
additional period of review and comment before it completes its work in
September 2013. The ATSTWG would use the comments it receives to
complete its work on this project and to develop its final report and
recommendations.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 19, 2013.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2013-17782 Filed 7-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P