Notice of Organization Name and Address Change, 44438-44439 [2013-17712]
Download as PDF
44438
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0611 to read as
follows:
■
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
15:33 Jul 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
2. In § 501.2, revise paragraph (g) to
read as follows:
■
§ 501.2 Postage Evidencing System
provider authorization.
39 CFR Part 501
Notice of Organization Name and
Address Change
§ 501.6 Suspension and revocation of
authorization.
Dated: July 16, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013–17912 Filed 7–22–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
The Postal Service is revising
the rules concerning authorization to
manufacture and distribute postage
evidencing systems to reflect that the
Office of Postage Technology
Management is now known as Payment
Technology and has a new mailing
address.
SUMMARY:
Effective date: July 24, 2013.
Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Programs
Specialist, Payment Technology, United
States Postal Service, at 202–268–7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® (USPS®)
has undergone a redesign. In that
process, the Office of Postage
Technology Management (PTM) was
renamed Payment Technology (PT) and
is now under the direction of the office
of the Vice President of Mail Entry and
Payment Technology, within the
purview of the Chief Information
Officer. In addition, since the relocation
of its physical office, Payment
Technology has a new mailing address.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, the Postal Service amends
39 CFR part 501 as follows:
PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO
MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE
POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 501 continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(a) Location. All waters of Lake
Michigan within a 2 Nautical Mile
radius of an approximate position at
42°15′01″ N, 87°36′0″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This rule is effective and will be
enforced from 12 p.m. until 11:59 p.m.
on July 25, 2013.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Lake
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector
General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95–
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
*
*
*
*
(g) The Postal Service office
responsible for administration of this
part is the Office of Payment
Technology (PT) or successor
organization. All submissions to the
Postal Service required or invited by
this part are to be made to this office in
person or via mail to 475 L’Enfant Plaza
SW., Room 3500, Washington DC
20260–0004.
■ 3. In § 501.6, revise paragraphs (c)(1)–
(3) and (e) to read as follows:
DATES:
§ 165.T09–0611 Safety Zone; Joint
Operations Exercise, Lake Michigan,
Illinois.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Upon determination by the Postal
Service that a provider is in violation of
provisions of this part, or that its Postal
Evidencing System poses an
unreasonable risk to postal revenue, PT,
acting on behalf of the Postal Service,
shall issue a written notice of proposed
suspension citing the specific
conditions or deficiencies for which
suspension of authorization to
manufacture and/or distribute a specific
Postage Evidencing System or class of
Postage Evidencing Systems may be
imposed. Except in cases of willful
violation, the provider shall be given an
opportunity to correct deficiencies and
achieve compliance with all
requirements within a time limit
corresponding to the potential risk to
postal revenue.
(2) In cases of willful violation, or if
the Postal Service determines that the
provider has failed to correct cited
deficiencies within the specified time
limit, PT shall issue a written notice of
suspension setting forth the facts and
reasons for the decision to suspend, and
the effective date if a written defense is
not presented as provided in paragraph
(d) of this section.
(3) The notice shall also advise the
provider of its right to file a response
under paragraph (d) of this section. If a
written response is not presented in a
timely manner the suspension may go
into effect. The suspension shall remain
in effect for ninety (90) calendar days
unless revoked or modified by PT.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) After receipt and consideration of
the defense, PT shall advise the
provider of its decision, and the facts
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
and reasons for it. The decision shall be
effective upon receipt unless it provides
otherwise. The decision shall also
advise the provider that it may be
appealed within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt (unless a shorter time
frame is deemed necessary). If an appeal
is not filed in a timely manner, the
decision of PT shall become a final
decision of the Postal Service. The
appeal may be filed with the Chief
Information Officer of the Postal Service
and must include all supporting
evidence and state with specificity the
reasons the provider believes that the
decision is erroneous. The decision of
the Chief Information Officer shall
constitute a final decision of the Postal
Service.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 501.7, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
to the impact of those changes on the
security of the Postage Evidencing
System and postage funds. Upon receipt
of the notification, PT will review the
summary of changes and make a
decision regarding the need for the
following:
(1) Additional documentation.
(2) Level of test and evaluation
required.
(3) Necessity for evaluation by a
laboratory accredited by the National
Institutes of Standards and Technology
(NIST) under the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NVLAP).
(b) Upon receipt and review of
additional documentation and/or test
results, PT will issue a written
acknowledgement and/or approval of
the change to the provider.
■ 7. In § 501.12, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 501.7 Postage Evidencing System
requirements.
§ 501.12
(a) A Postage Evidencing System
submitted to the Postal Service for
approval must meet the requirements of
the Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance
Criteria published by PT. Copies of the
current Performance Criteria may be
requested via mail to the address in
§ 501.2(g).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 501.8, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 501.8 Postage Evidencing System test
and approval.
(a) To receive Postal Service approval,
each Postage Evidencing System must
be submitted by the provider and
evaluated by the Postal Service in
accordance with the Postage Evidencing
Product Submission Procedures
published by PT. Copies of the current
Performance Criteria may be requested
via mail to the address in § 501.2(g).
These procedures apply to all proposed
Postage Evidencing Systems regardless
of whether the provider is currently
authorized by the Postal Service to
distribute Postage Evidencing Systems.
All testing required by the Postal
Service will be an expense of the
provider.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Revise § 501.10 to read as follows:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 501.10 Postage Evidencing System
modifications.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Jul 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
submission to address the reasonable
further progress (RFP) plan
requirements for the Atlanta, Georgia
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS)
nonattainment area. EPA is considering
this comment and will address the
comment in a subsequent action. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action.
The direct final rule published at
78 FR 32135 on May 29, 2013, is
withdrawn as of July 24, 2013.
DATES:
Sara
Waterson, Air Planning Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Phone
number: (404) 562–9061; Email:
waterson.sara@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2013–17712 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am]
On May
29, 2013 (78 FR 32135), EPA published
a direct final rulemaking to approve
Georgia’s October 21, 2009, SIP
submission to address the RFP plan
requirements for the Atlanta, Georgia
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
nonattainment area. In the direct final
rule, EPA stated that if adverse
comments were received by June 28,
2013, the rule would be withdrawn and
not take effect. On June 28, 2013, EPA
received a comment. EPA interprets this
comment as adverse and, therefore, EPA
is withdrawing a portion of the direct
final rule. EPA will address the
comment in a subsequent final action
based upon the proposed rulemaking
action, also published on May 29, 2013
(78 FR 32222). EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Administrative sanctions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) After receipt and consideration of
the defense, the Postal Service shall
advise the provider of the decision, and
the facts and reasons for it; the decision
shall be effective upon receipt unless it
provides otherwise. The decision shall
also advise the provider that it may,
within thirty (30) calendar days of
receiving written notice, appeal that
determination to the Chief Information
Officer of the Postal Service, who shall
issue a written decision upon the
appeal, which will constitute the final
Postal Service decision.
*
*
*
*
*
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0223; FRL–9837–2]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans: Atlanta, Georgia
1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment
Area; Reasonable Further Progress
Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
AGENCY:
(a) An authorized provider must
receive prior written approval from the
manager, PT, of any and all changes
made to a previously approved Postage
Evidencing System. The notification
must include a summary of all changes
made and the provider’s assessment as
44439
Due to the receipt of an
adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing
the May 29, 2013, direct final rule to
approve Georgia’s October 21, 2009,
state implementation plan (SIP)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, and Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 12, 2013.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Accordingly, the direct final rule
which published in the Federal Register
on May 29, 2013, at 78 FR 32135 is
withdrawn as of July 24, 2013.
■
[FR Doc. 2013–17689 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 24, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44438-44439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17712]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 501
Notice of Organization Name and Address Change
AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising the rules concerning
authorization to manufacture and distribute postage evidencing systems
to reflect that the Office of Postage Technology Management is now
known as Payment Technology and has a new mailing address.
DATES: Effective date: July 24, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Programs
Specialist, Payment Technology, United States Postal Service, at 202-
268-7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg]
(USPS[supreg]) has undergone a redesign. In that process, the Office of
Postage Technology Management (PTM) was renamed Payment Technology (PT)
and is now under the direction of the office of the Vice President of
Mail Entry and Payment Technology, within the purview of the Chief
Information Officer. In addition, since the relocation of its physical
office, Payment Technology has a new mailing address.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal
Service amends 39 CFR part 501 as follows:
PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410,
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
0
2. In Sec. 501.2, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.2 Postage Evidencing System provider authorization.
* * * * *
(g) The Postal Service office responsible for administration of
this part is the Office of Payment Technology (PT) or successor
organization. All submissions to the Postal Service required or invited
by this part are to be made to this office in person or via mail to 475
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Room 3500, Washington DC 20260-0004.
0
3. In Sec. 501.6, revise paragraphs (c)(1)-(3) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 501.6 Suspension and revocation of authorization.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Upon determination by the Postal Service that a provider is in
violation of provisions of this part, or that its Postal Evidencing
System poses an unreasonable risk to postal revenue, PT, acting on
behalf of the Postal Service, shall issue a written notice of proposed
suspension citing the specific conditions or deficiencies for which
suspension of authorization to manufacture and/or distribute a specific
Postage Evidencing System or class of Postage Evidencing Systems may be
imposed. Except in cases of willful violation, the provider shall be
given an opportunity to correct deficiencies and achieve compliance
with all requirements within a time limit corresponding to the
potential risk to postal revenue.
(2) In cases of willful violation, or if the Postal Service
determines that the provider has failed to correct cited deficiencies
within the specified time limit, PT shall issue a written notice of
suspension setting forth the facts and reasons for the decision to
suspend, and the effective date if a written defense is not presented
as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
(3) The notice shall also advise the provider of its right to file
a response under paragraph (d) of this section. If a written response
is not presented in a timely manner the suspension may go into effect.
The suspension shall remain in effect for ninety (90) calendar days
unless revoked or modified by PT.
* * * * *
(e) After receipt and consideration of the defense, PT shall advise
the provider of its decision, and the facts
[[Page 44439]]
and reasons for it. The decision shall be effective upon receipt unless
it provides otherwise. The decision shall also advise the provider that
it may be appealed within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt (unless
a shorter time frame is deemed necessary). If an appeal is not filed in
a timely manner, the decision of PT shall become a final decision of
the Postal Service. The appeal may be filed with the Chief Information
Officer of the Postal Service and must include all supporting evidence
and state with specificity the reasons the provider believes that the
decision is erroneous. The decision of the Chief Information Officer
shall constitute a final decision of the Postal Service.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 501.7, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.7 Postage Evidencing System requirements.
(a) A Postage Evidencing System submitted to the Postal Service for
approval must meet the requirements of the Intelligent Mail Indicia
Performance Criteria published by PT. Copies of the current Performance
Criteria may be requested via mail to the address in Sec. 501.2(g).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 501.8, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.8 Postage Evidencing System test and approval.
(a) To receive Postal Service approval, each Postage Evidencing
System must be submitted by the provider and evaluated by the Postal
Service in accordance with the Postage Evidencing Product Submission
Procedures published by PT. Copies of the current Performance Criteria
may be requested via mail to the address in Sec. 501.2(g). These
procedures apply to all proposed Postage Evidencing Systems regardless
of whether the provider is currently authorized by the Postal Service
to distribute Postage Evidencing Systems. All testing required by the
Postal Service will be an expense of the provider.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 501.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 501.10 Postage Evidencing System modifications.
(a) An authorized provider must receive prior written approval from
the manager, PT, of any and all changes made to a previously approved
Postage Evidencing System. The notification must include a summary of
all changes made and the provider's assessment as to the impact of
those changes on the security of the Postage Evidencing System and
postage funds. Upon receipt of the notification, PT will review the
summary of changes and make a decision regarding the need for the
following:
(1) Additional documentation.
(2) Level of test and evaluation required.
(3) Necessity for evaluation by a laboratory accredited by the
National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).
(b) Upon receipt and review of additional documentation and/or test
results, PT will issue a written acknowledgement and/or approval of the
change to the provider.
0
7. In Sec. 501.12, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 501.12 Administrative sanctions.
* * * * *
(d) After receipt and consideration of the defense, the Postal
Service shall advise the provider of the decision, and the facts and
reasons for it; the decision shall be effective upon receipt unless it
provides otherwise. The decision shall also advise the provider that it
may, within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving written notice,
appeal that determination to the Chief Information Officer of the
Postal Service, who shall issue a written decision upon the appeal,
which will constitute the final Postal Service decision.
* * * * *
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2013-17712 Filed 7-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P