Notice of Organization Name and Address Change, 44438-44439 [2013-17712]

Download as PDF 44438 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and, therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2. Add § 165.T09–0611 to read as follows: ■ ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES 15:33 Jul 23, 2013 Jkt 229001 2. In § 501.2, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows: ■ § 501.2 Postage Evidencing System provider authorization. 39 CFR Part 501 Notice of Organization Name and Address Change § 501.6 Suspension and revocation of authorization. Dated: July 16, 2013. M.W. Sibley, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan. [FR Doc. 2013–17912 Filed 7–22–13; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P POSTAL SERVICE The Postal Service is revising the rules concerning authorization to manufacture and distribute postage evidencing systems to reflect that the Office of Postage Technology Management is now known as Payment Technology and has a new mailing address. SUMMARY: Effective date: July 24, 2013. Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Programs Specialist, Payment Technology, United States Postal Service, at 202–268–7613. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® (USPS®) has undergone a redesign. In that process, the Office of Postage Technology Management (PTM) was renamed Payment Technology (PT) and is now under the direction of the office of the Vice President of Mail Entry and Payment Technology, within the purview of the Chief Information Officer. In addition, since the relocation of its physical office, Payment Technology has a new mailing address. List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501 Administrative practice and procedure. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal Service amends 39 CFR part 501 as follows: PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS 1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as follows: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (a) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan within a 2 Nautical Mile radius of an approximate position at 42°15′01″ N, 87°36′0″ W (NAD 83). (b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule is effective and will be enforced from 12 p.m. until 11:59 p.m. on July 25, 2013. (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene representative. (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative. (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan to act on his behalf. (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95– 452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3. * * * * (g) The Postal Service office responsible for administration of this part is the Office of Payment Technology (PT) or successor organization. All submissions to the Postal Service required or invited by this part are to be made to this office in person or via mail to 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Room 3500, Washington DC 20260–0004. ■ 3. In § 501.6, revise paragraphs (c)(1)– (3) and (e) to read as follows: DATES: § 165.T09–0611 Safety Zone; Joint Operations Exercise, Lake Michigan, Illinois. VerDate Mar<15>2010 Michigan or his on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative. * * * * (c) * * * (1) Upon determination by the Postal Service that a provider is in violation of provisions of this part, or that its Postal Evidencing System poses an unreasonable risk to postal revenue, PT, acting on behalf of the Postal Service, shall issue a written notice of proposed suspension citing the specific conditions or deficiencies for which suspension of authorization to manufacture and/or distribute a specific Postage Evidencing System or class of Postage Evidencing Systems may be imposed. Except in cases of willful violation, the provider shall be given an opportunity to correct deficiencies and achieve compliance with all requirements within a time limit corresponding to the potential risk to postal revenue. (2) In cases of willful violation, or if the Postal Service determines that the provider has failed to correct cited deficiencies within the specified time limit, PT shall issue a written notice of suspension setting forth the facts and reasons for the decision to suspend, and the effective date if a written defense is not presented as provided in paragraph (d) of this section. (3) The notice shall also advise the provider of its right to file a response under paragraph (d) of this section. If a written response is not presented in a timely manner the suspension may go into effect. The suspension shall remain in effect for ninety (90) calendar days unless revoked or modified by PT. * * * * * (e) After receipt and consideration of the defense, PT shall advise the provider of its decision, and the facts E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM 24JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 24, 2013 / Rules and Regulations and reasons for it. The decision shall be effective upon receipt unless it provides otherwise. The decision shall also advise the provider that it may be appealed within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt (unless a shorter time frame is deemed necessary). If an appeal is not filed in a timely manner, the decision of PT shall become a final decision of the Postal Service. The appeal may be filed with the Chief Information Officer of the Postal Service and must include all supporting evidence and state with specificity the reasons the provider believes that the decision is erroneous. The decision of the Chief Information Officer shall constitute a final decision of the Postal Service. * * * * * ■ 4. In § 501.7, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows: to the impact of those changes on the security of the Postage Evidencing System and postage funds. Upon receipt of the notification, PT will review the summary of changes and make a decision regarding the need for the following: (1) Additional documentation. (2) Level of test and evaluation required. (3) Necessity for evaluation by a laboratory accredited by the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). (b) Upon receipt and review of additional documentation and/or test results, PT will issue a written acknowledgement and/or approval of the change to the provider. ■ 7. In § 501.12, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 501.7 Postage Evidencing System requirements. § 501.12 (a) A Postage Evidencing System submitted to the Postal Service for approval must meet the requirements of the Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance Criteria published by PT. Copies of the current Performance Criteria may be requested via mail to the address in § 501.2(g). * * * * * ■ 5. In § 501.8, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 501.8 Postage Evidencing System test and approval. (a) To receive Postal Service approval, each Postage Evidencing System must be submitted by the provider and evaluated by the Postal Service in accordance with the Postage Evidencing Product Submission Procedures published by PT. Copies of the current Performance Criteria may be requested via mail to the address in § 501.2(g). These procedures apply to all proposed Postage Evidencing Systems regardless of whether the provider is currently authorized by the Postal Service to distribute Postage Evidencing Systems. All testing required by the Postal Service will be an expense of the provider. * * * * * ■ 6. Revise § 501.10 to read as follows: ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES § 501.10 Postage Evidencing System modifications. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:33 Jul 23, 2013 Jkt 229001 submission to address the reasonable further progress (RFP) plan requirements for the Atlanta, Georgia 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) nonattainment area. EPA is considering this comment and will address the comment in a subsequent action. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. The direct final rule published at 78 FR 32135 on May 29, 2013, is withdrawn as of July 24, 2013. DATES: Sara Waterson, Air Planning Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Phone number: (404) 562–9061; Email: waterson.sara@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 2013–17712 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am] On May 29, 2013 (78 FR 32135), EPA published a direct final rulemaking to approve Georgia’s October 21, 2009, SIP submission to address the RFP plan requirements for the Atlanta, Georgia 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS nonattainment area. In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were received by June 28, 2013, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On June 28, 2013, EPA received a comment. EPA interprets this comment as adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing a portion of the direct final rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed rulemaking action, also published on May 29, 2013 (78 FR 32222). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. BILLING CODE 7710–12–P List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Administrative sanctions. * * * * * (d) After receipt and consideration of the defense, the Postal Service shall advise the provider of the decision, and the facts and reasons for it; the decision shall be effective upon receipt unless it provides otherwise. The decision shall also advise the provider that it may, within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving written notice, appeal that determination to the Chief Information Officer of the Postal Service, who shall issue a written decision upon the appeal, which will constitute the final Postal Service decision. * * * * * Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0223; FRL–9837–2] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Atlanta, Georgia 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; Reasonable Further Progress Plan Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. AGENCY: (a) An authorized provider must receive prior written approval from the manager, PT, of any and all changes made to a previously approved Postage Evidencing System. The notification must include a summary of all changes made and the provider’s assessment as 44439 Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the May 29, 2013, direct final rule to approve Georgia’s October 21, 2009, state implementation plan (SIP) SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and Volatile organic compounds. Dated: July 12, 2013. Beverly H. Banister, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. Accordingly, the direct final rule which published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2013, at 78 FR 32135 is withdrawn as of July 24, 2013. ■ [FR Doc. 2013–17689 Filed 7–23–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM 24JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 24, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44438-44439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17712]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 501


Notice of Organization Name and Address Change

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising the rules concerning 
authorization to manufacture and distribute postage evidencing systems 
to reflect that the Office of Postage Technology Management is now 
known as Payment Technology and has a new mailing address.

DATES: Effective date: July 24, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Programs 
Specialist, Payment Technology, United States Postal Service, at 202-
268-7613.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
(USPS[supreg]) has undergone a redesign. In that process, the Office of 
Postage Technology Management (PTM) was renamed Payment Technology (PT) 
and is now under the direction of the office of the Vice President of 
Mail Entry and Payment Technology, within the purview of the Chief 
Information Officer. In addition, since the relocation of its physical 
office, Payment Technology has a new mailing address.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501

    Administrative practice and procedure.

    Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal 
Service amends 39 CFR part 501 as follows:

PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE 
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS

0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.

0
2. In Sec.  501.2, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.2  Postage Evidencing System provider authorization.

* * * * *
    (g) The Postal Service office responsible for administration of 
this part is the Office of Payment Technology (PT) or successor 
organization. All submissions to the Postal Service required or invited 
by this part are to be made to this office in person or via mail to 475 
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Room 3500, Washington DC 20260-0004.

0
3. In Sec.  501.6, revise paragraphs (c)(1)-(3) and (e) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  501.6  Suspension and revocation of authorization.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Upon determination by the Postal Service that a provider is in 
violation of provisions of this part, or that its Postal Evidencing 
System poses an unreasonable risk to postal revenue, PT, acting on 
behalf of the Postal Service, shall issue a written notice of proposed 
suspension citing the specific conditions or deficiencies for which 
suspension of authorization to manufacture and/or distribute a specific 
Postage Evidencing System or class of Postage Evidencing Systems may be 
imposed. Except in cases of willful violation, the provider shall be 
given an opportunity to correct deficiencies and achieve compliance 
with all requirements within a time limit corresponding to the 
potential risk to postal revenue.
    (2) In cases of willful violation, or if the Postal Service 
determines that the provider has failed to correct cited deficiencies 
within the specified time limit, PT shall issue a written notice of 
suspension setting forth the facts and reasons for the decision to 
suspend, and the effective date if a written defense is not presented 
as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
    (3) The notice shall also advise the provider of its right to file 
a response under paragraph (d) of this section. If a written response 
is not presented in a timely manner the suspension may go into effect. 
The suspension shall remain in effect for ninety (90) calendar days 
unless revoked or modified by PT.
* * * * *
    (e) After receipt and consideration of the defense, PT shall advise 
the provider of its decision, and the facts

[[Page 44439]]

and reasons for it. The decision shall be effective upon receipt unless 
it provides otherwise. The decision shall also advise the provider that 
it may be appealed within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt (unless 
a shorter time frame is deemed necessary). If an appeal is not filed in 
a timely manner, the decision of PT shall become a final decision of 
the Postal Service. The appeal may be filed with the Chief Information 
Officer of the Postal Service and must include all supporting evidence 
and state with specificity the reasons the provider believes that the 
decision is erroneous. The decision of the Chief Information Officer 
shall constitute a final decision of the Postal Service.
* * * * *

0
4. In Sec.  501.7, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.7  Postage Evidencing System requirements.

    (a) A Postage Evidencing System submitted to the Postal Service for 
approval must meet the requirements of the Intelligent Mail Indicia 
Performance Criteria published by PT. Copies of the current Performance 
Criteria may be requested via mail to the address in Sec.  501.2(g).
* * * * *

0
5. In Sec.  501.8, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.8  Postage Evidencing System test and approval.

    (a) To receive Postal Service approval, each Postage Evidencing 
System must be submitted by the provider and evaluated by the Postal 
Service in accordance with the Postage Evidencing Product Submission 
Procedures published by PT. Copies of the current Performance Criteria 
may be requested via mail to the address in Sec.  501.2(g). These 
procedures apply to all proposed Postage Evidencing Systems regardless 
of whether the provider is currently authorized by the Postal Service 
to distribute Postage Evidencing Systems. All testing required by the 
Postal Service will be an expense of the provider.
* * * * *

0
6. Revise Sec.  501.10 to read as follows:


Sec.  501.10  Postage Evidencing System modifications.

    (a) An authorized provider must receive prior written approval from 
the manager, PT, of any and all changes made to a previously approved 
Postage Evidencing System. The notification must include a summary of 
all changes made and the provider's assessment as to the impact of 
those changes on the security of the Postage Evidencing System and 
postage funds. Upon receipt of the notification, PT will review the 
summary of changes and make a decision regarding the need for the 
following:
    (1) Additional documentation.
    (2) Level of test and evaluation required.
    (3) Necessity for evaluation by a laboratory accredited by the 
National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the 
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).
    (b) Upon receipt and review of additional documentation and/or test 
results, PT will issue a written acknowledgement and/or approval of the 
change to the provider.

0
7. In Sec.  501.12, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  501.12  Administrative sanctions.

* * * * *
    (d) After receipt and consideration of the defense, the Postal 
Service shall advise the provider of the decision, and the facts and 
reasons for it; the decision shall be effective upon receipt unless it 
provides otherwise. The decision shall also advise the provider that it 
may, within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving written notice, 
appeal that determination to the Chief Information Officer of the 
Postal Service, who shall issue a written decision upon the appeal, 
which will constitute the final Postal Service decision.
* * * * *

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2013-17712 Filed 7-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.